Slashdot Mirror
London Police Placing Anti-Piracy Warning Ads On Illegal Sites
mrspoonsi (2955715) writes "The City of London police has started placing banner advertisements on websites believed to be offering pirated content illegally. The messages, which will appear instead of paid-for ads, will ask users to close their web browsers. The move comes as part of a continuing effort to stop piracy sites from earning money through advertising. Police said the ads would make it harder for piracy site owners to make their pages look authentic. "When adverts from well known brands appear on illegal websites, they lend them a look of legitimacy and inadvertently fool consumers into thinking the site is authentic," said Detective Chief Inspector Andy Fyfe from the City of London Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (Pipcu). "This new initiative is another step forward for the unit in tackling IP crime and disrupting criminal profits. "Copyright infringing websites are making huge sums of money though advert placement, therefore disrupting advertising on these sites is crucial and this is why it is an integral part of Operation Creative.""
I think piratebay is very authentic, irrelevantly of what is thought of its legality.
Piracy sites have found a way to get the Police to pay them money. Whatever war on copyright infringement there might have been, I think it's safe to say that it is over.
No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
Apparently the rule "innocent until proven guilty" does not apply to "websites", as evidenced by the city of london police.
This police bunch, it is worth noting, is the police force of the "square mile", which is pretty much run by private corporations, making this essentially a private police force in government-backed livery. It is not strange that it would be acting "proactive" and "innovative" and whatnot in furtherance of private corporate goals.
I think the take home message here is that in London internet users somehow ended up receiving relevant ads from well known brands.
I seem to have nothing but crap. Right now I'm staring at an advert for a phone from a brand which is virtually unheard of (though quite prevailent, Huawei), and some company called Brocade who have something to do with bridges from what I can tell?
Where do I get these mythical well known brands?
Giving how much tax money all these corporations are paying, with absolutely no dodging of any taxes, it's really great to see the police devote so much time and resources to protecting these companies' revenue streams. Almost all the murderers, rapists, and thieves have been locked up. There's very little to no fraud going on in any industries, especially the financial sector who has a primary hub in London. We should definitely cheer on the police in this latest endeavour of serving and protecting corporate interests.
Police said the ads would make it harder for piracy site owners to make their pages look authentic
No one confuses Rapidshare for BMG's official site. People go there specifically to download pirated content, full stop. Seeing police ads might scare a few people with the paranoia of thinking "the man" has caught them, but the other 99% of visitors will just thank the police for subsidizing their favorite warez sites.
Truly pathetic, Boys in Blue (Hmm, do Bobbies wear blue?)
The move comes as part of a continuing effort to stop piracy sites from earning money through advertising.
By... Um... Buying banner ads on piracy sites? BRILLIANT!
Are there a lot of pirate websites located in the city of London?
One thing I'd like to point out is that the City of London Police are not the same thing as the British Metropolitan Police. This was something that came up in an article a few months ago where the City of London Police were fighting against piracy. They're basically an area within London that has existed for hundreds of years under corporate rule.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C...
The City of London police are basically a corporate police force with an authority that does not go beyond the corporate-controlled City of London area.
...take care of this nuisance. Who in their right mind allows third party sites to run in their browser anyway?
Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
Argh! Forgot to check for unicode stripping. Corrected.
It is worth stressing that: The City of London is not equal to A city called London, capital of the UK. The City of London Police is not equal to Metropolitan Police, the police force for London.
The City of London is a square mile of land governed by a plutocracy. The actions of their police force does not surprise me.
Mod me down now and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine
It's what you have to do after you drink a whole lot of crime.
Look, crimes actually CAN be committed using computers.
Don't believe me? Just ask anyone who has been hit over the head with a computer.
I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
Websites by themselves aren't "illegal". Using those terms gives undue legitimacy to copyright maximalists. What is meant here by "illegal" is that they host content which may be infringing on copyright.
"Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
Hey editors, the City of London Police is NOT the same as the London Police. To get a good understanding of the difference, please view The (secret) City of London, Part 1: History (less than 5 min) and then The (secret) City of London, Part 2: Government (less than 6 min).
JigJag
"The hallmark of humanity is the ability to move beyond sensory inputs" - Mary Helen Immordino-Yang
It's the crime of intercepting data involving the Internet Protocol and modifying or blocking data. Because we as a civilized world finally came to realize one of the greatest crimes against humanity was manipulating or censoring what others say or think and the Internet is clearly a global medium that represents humanity's great communication, inter-connectivity breakthrough.
Sorry, I'm just kidding. This is all about money. And fictitious, government-created property. "Intellectual" property: because it's only marginally important to protect the intellectuals work in academia--plagiarism is the higher crime there--and we care so very much about the barely intellectual multi-billion dollar entertainment industry. Oh and advancing the arts and the sciences. Because fuck knows the study of material sciences, development of new technology, etc aren't inherently spurred by the competition inherent in capitalism. Or that there's such a low barrier to entry that merely knowing this stuff is enough to fundamentally undermine the big players that are responsible for such advances.
Get back to me when we all have nano printers and as a society actually respect academia or art at more than the most superficial level.
They're not trying to convince the 10% that do it knowingly, they're trying to convince the 80% that don't know better.
Citation needed. Is it true that 80% don't know better, 10% do it knowingly? What happened to the other 10%?
Korma: Good
That was an accident ! Can we move on I was young, times were different back then.
I'm pretty sure this will work as well as the unskippable FBI warning on DVD movies.
I've got better things to do tonight than die.
it's silly for the state to jump in and spend so much time, effort, and money on what is essentially a failure of business to demonstrate to people that their content is worth purchasing. free market rules, y'all
Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.