Slashdot Mirror


Sony Tosses the Sony Reader On the Scrap Heap

Nate the greatest (2261802) writes Sony has decided to follow up closing its ebook stores in the U.S. and Europe by getting out of the consumer ebook reader market entirely. (Yes, Sony was still making ereaders.) The current model (the Sony Reader PRS-T3) will be sold until stock runs out, and Sony won't be releasing a new model. This is a sad end for what used to be a pioneering company. This gadget maker might not have made the first ebook reader but it was the first to use the paper-like E-ink screen. Having launched the Sony Librie in 2004, Sony literally invented the modern ebook reader and it then went on to release the only 7" models to grace the market as well as the first ereader to combine a touchscreen and frontlight (the Sony Reader PRS-700). Unfortunately Sony couldn't come up with software or an ebook retail site which matched their hardware genius, so even though Sony released amazing hardware it had been losing ground to Amazon, B&N, and other retailers ever since the Kindle launched in 2007.

172 comments

  1. That kinda sucks by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    they made really nice ones, at least as far as screen. I'm guessing they can't compete with the heavily subsidized Amazon Kindles though...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:That kinda sucks by BobNET · · Score: 2

      My PRS-650 was one of the few Sony products I've ever used that didn't suck.

      Then again, I never installed the software that came with it -- only calibre.

    2. Re:That kinda sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The real problem is you cant just make decent hardware and expect it to sell. The same issue exists with the slew of Android tablets out there, sure there is decent hardware and an operating system but theres not much you can do with them beyond web browsing (which historically hasnt been that great, especially the flagship Nexus 7, maybe they fixed that in the 2013 version) as there is very little in the way of useful tablet applications for them so you get the crappy experience of up-scaled phone applications.

      Even the Nexus 7 is pretty useless given the dropping prices of large screen Android smartphones, combine that with the lack of tablet-specific applications and all you have is a slightly larger phone that can't make phone calls. I am not saying there isnt a market for it but it has been conclusively proven that the market is very small indeed. Sony had the same problem, sure their device was cheap but nobody wants a useless device no matter how cheap it is.

    3. Re:That kinda sucks by antifoidulus · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately that is pretty much an apt description of everything Sony has made in the past 2 decades or so, really slick hardware with crap software and frustrating incompatibilities. They either need to just do a clean sweep of their software division or else just become a hardware design consulting company.

    4. Re:That kinda sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If sony is the one that came up with e-ink I hope they make a bunch of money off the patents, because e-ink displays are simply the best for e-readers.
      I've never used one made by sony, but I really like my kindle paper white. I can't imagine trying to read a book on an ipad or similar for several hours.
      I did try out a sony one at some point, but back then it sucked a bit (so did all the others). The screen refresh rate was simply too slow and the pixels were too big.

    5. Re:That kinda sucks by timeOday · · Score: 2
      I think not, because of the bad precedent in the music industry. Sony bought CBS Music for $2BN (a huge acquisition back then!) in 1987 when they were riding high on the Walkman and Discman, thus owning the catalogue of Michael Jackson among many others. Sony was ideally positioned to dominate portable music, forever. Where is it now?

      Likewise I look at my Clie TH55 and see today's Mobile devices, 10 years ago. And where is Sony now?

    6. Re:That kinda sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I know what you mean, and agree with you in general, but with the e-readers that wasn't my experience at all.

      The e-readers were top of their class; the software features were great, and they were generally really good about format compatibility, unencumbered by the sort of crap being pushed by Amazon.

      Sony also came way before anyone else in bringing e-ink to the market.

      I'm really sad to hear that they're pulling out of the e-reader market. Their professional large-format e-reader is actually exactly what I need, even more so than a tablet; the only obstacle to me buying it is the extreme price. I was hoping it would trickle down to a more consumer-grade model--maybe the price will still come down?

      In the case of their e-readers it's not poor software, but them not being hooked into a large publisher or book distributor. I saw this as a strength, but I guess for most people it's a liability (another thing that makes me sad, as it suggests people don't see the importance of separating hardware from content provision to avoid monopolies and encourage competition).

      p.s. I'm amazed that people don't see the parallels between Sony and Apple, as your statement that they produce "really slick hardware with crap software and frustrating incompatibilities" could be said about Apple just as well. In that regard I see Apple as sort of being the contemporary equivalent of the 80s and 90s Sony. I say that as someone who's pretty satisfied with their Macbook Air, and who is a happy owner of a number of Sony products. I can see Apple sort of heading down the same path.

    7. Re:That kinda sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Sony products fro the early 90s to the late 2000s had two defining qualities:
      - they were loaded with proprietary cr*p. Sony suffered the worst case of NIH ever. They had to have their own everything, from music compression to memory cards. This cost them a bundle in engineering, wasted time reinventing the wheel, and made for subpar products because the customers had to buy expensive gadgets that wouldn't be any use with anything else or had to be transcoded or whatever.
      - they were infected with DRM schemes. From the VHS experience they seem to have got the idea that they _had_ to have the content providers on board, plus for a while they had their own music and films studios. Again this made for subpar customer experience.

      And also, like you said, their software was just bad.

      The result of that is that they missed out on just about every category of electronic gizmo that hit the market in that time period. Phones, mp3 player, organizers, laptops, tablets, you name it.

      With the image and brand recognition they had, they should have been Apple. The rest is history.

    8. Re:That kinda sucks by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

      No, screw that. If we had a Justice Department that was worth a damn, Amazon would be broken up into a dozen different companies. No way they should be allowed to control the e-book market AND the ebook reader market. Plus the Amazon Prime content and the music/movie business.

      Amazon is why anti-trust laws were passed in the first place.

      Now I hate Sony like sin itself, and would never buy any of their products, but there's no way they should get chased out of the ebook reader market because of illegal competition.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    9. Re:That kinda sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I switched to a Kindle because the Kindle of the time was significantly lighter and had a better battery life, and the later Sony readers had a touchscreen which gave the e-ink screen a blurry, shiny look. I object to the claim that the lackluster store and software are the only reason people didn't buy them.

    10. Re:That kinda sucks by Sable+Drakon · · Score: 1

      That fell apart because Sony didn't anticipate what direction things would take, letting Apple overtake them along with just about everyone else.

      --
      The Amarri pray for god, the Caldari pray for profit. the Gallente pray for peace, but the Minmatar pray their ships hol
    11. Re: That kinda sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Amazon is nowhere near having a monopoly on anything, unless you suddenly forgot about Apple, Google, Netflix, Hulu, Newegg, TigerDirect, etc.

    12. Re:That kinda sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      E Inc is its own company. SONY was one of their first big customers.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E...

    13. Re:That kinda sucks by exomondo · · Score: 1

      No, screw that. If we had a Justice Department that was worth a damn, Amazon would be broken up into a dozen different companies.

      Why?

      No way they should be allowed to control the e-book market AND the ebook reader market.

      They don't.

      Plus the Amazon Prime content and the music/movie business.

      What? Have you not heard of iTunes? or Netflix? or Google Play? or Hulu? or Spotify? or Pandora? or XBox Music/Video?

    14. Re:That kinda sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Amazon doesnt have a monopoly though, while they do make a phone, tablet and e-reader and bundle their services they do not have a monopoly with any of those devices or services. If any company should be broken up it is Google with its stranglehold on the smartphone market it has near 85% marketshare and its operating system is so dominant that the latest release of its nearest competitor (Apple with iOS8) is basically an exercise in copying Android features yet it continues to bundle its web browser, its email client, its application store, its music/video service, its mapping service, etc ... with its operating system, leveraging its monopoly to promote its other products/services. Amazon is not even close to that level of dominance in any of its markets (at least not yet).

      Microsoft's attempts to do this with just the browser resulted in the browser ballot which succeeded in breaking up the IE monopoly and we saw a surge in usage of Firefox and Chrome (even Safari back when Apple was doing a Windows version of it) so its about time we saw the same thing with Android to get some more competition in this area of products/services. A monopoly in one area is fine, leveraging that monopoly to push other products and services is not.

    15. Re:That kinda sucks by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

      And every ISP should be split from its content provider (both Cableco and Telco) but it won't happen...

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    16. Re:That kinda sucks by Hamsterdan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No. They did what they always do, and tried to push a proprietary format (Minidisc and ATRAC) instead of embracing an established standard. With their music catalog, they could have *owned* the MP3 player market like they did with the original Walkman. (add to that their movie catalog and they could have killed the iPod touch before it was even born.)

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    17. Re: That kinda sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's it exactly

    18. Re: That kinda sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At home I used to balance a laptop on my stomach when I looked something up but now that we have a couple of tablets the laptop is strictly for work. Tablets are great coffee table thingies. Entertain the kids, play a quick game of whatever, etc. We're getting good use from ours.

    19. Re:That kinda sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly. I've had friends with Sony readers and I wasted many days over the years trying to get those things to work right. The quality of the hardware was always good. It was the same, tired, mistake that Sony always did. Their software SUCKED to the point where using it was almost pointless.

      The client-side software on the PC barely (if ever) worked right. USB conflicts all over the place. Their DRM-laden eBooks was monstrous to work with. I have zero sympathy for Sony in this area. When they tried to compete with the iPod, their ATRAC-format, and software also seriously sucked back then too.

      Sony had their chance. They deserve to simply die and be buried. Another once-great company put out of its misery.

    20. Re:That kinda sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If any company should be broken up it is Google with its stranglehold on the smartphone market it has near 85% marketshare

      Google doesn't sell smartphones, nor does it control the dominant smartphone OS.

      Android is open source and freely available to any manufacturer who wants to use and/or customize it. That's why companies like Xiaomi (which recently rose to be the 5th largest phone maker in the world) can offer a very capable Android phone that has no Google software on it.

      Google Services are useful enough that most people want them on their phones, but that doesn't preclude any other manufacturer from making very successful phones without them, as Xiaomi has demonstrated.

    21. Re:That kinda sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sure there is decent hardware and an operating system but theres not much you can do with them beyond web browsing

      Huh?

      What a weird thing to say.

    22. Re:That kinda sucks by youngone · · Score: 1

      The second part of your post is why they're in trouble. I won't buy any of their products either. Neither will lots of other people.

    23. Re:That kinda sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No love for the "Memory Stick"?

    24. Re:That kinda sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What probably killed them was their ATRAC3 DRM and the fiddly OpenMG software. One device I had (which used MagicGate 64 MB memory sticks) had to have all songs transcoded to its own format from MP3 (or ripped directly), and didn't allow "copying" of files. You had to check out and check in tracks... and if you formatted your device, you lost that. You only had the ability to have each song checked out 2-3 times at most.

      Backups? You -might- be able to restore your collection, but you would have to call a Sony tech support line for an unlock code.

      Sony's SonicStage (on their Vaios) was a little bit better, but by that time, the iPod was out, had no meaningful DRM, and that was the end of that.

    25. Re:That kinda sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why companies like Xiaomi (which recently rose to be the 5th largest phone maker in the world) can offer a very capable Android phone that has no Google software on it.

      while Xiaomi does sell phones with MIUI those are incompatible forks of Android and often end up with google play services installed as that proprietary blob is required for many Android applications to work.

      Android is open source and freely available to any manufacturer who wants to use and/or customize it.

      Windows is the same, no OEM ever needed to ship Windows systems with IE as the default browser.

      Google Services are useful enough that most people want them on their phones, but that doesn't preclude any other manufacturer from making very successful phones without them, as Xiaomi has demonstrated.

      Google Services are necessary enough that most people need them on their phones, much like IE6 has been necessary for a long time even though nothing ever precluded any OEM from making very successful PCs without it. The google service binary blob is where all the new innovative functionality goes, not into AOSP, so devices without it are becoming less and less compatible.

    26. Re:That kinda sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No. They did what they always do, and tried to push a proprietary format (Minidisc and ATRAC) instead of embracing an established standard.

      MiniDisc wasn't the problem. It was a great replacement for cassettes (even if Sony and retailers initially made the mistake of pushing it as a competitor to the CD). Random access track playback, track names, high-fidelity recording on Walkman-sized devices, random access editing without a razor blade: MiniDisc OWNED tape in oh so many ways. The ATRAC format was a logical choice for MiniDisc since the format had to be writable (not just readable) by the sort of portable hardware available back when MiniDisc first came out.

      One of the Sony's big problems was their embrace of copy protection and DRM and the philosophy behind it. And this appears to have started when they bought out the CBS/Columbia record and movie studio operations around the time of the DAT fight. Technology like the Triniton CRT and the Walkman were about adding value for customers, while DRM is always about subtracting it.

      With MiniDisc, Sony did things like bringing out MiniDisc "recorders" that had no microphone or line in jacks, only the ability to "record" over a DRMed USB connection. I guess they thought these were competitors for MP3 players and iPods. It took a long time for high-capacity MiniDiscs to arrive and in the meantime, Sony tried to push low-bitrate recording modes that were not always the greatest for sound quality.

    27. Re:That kinda sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get Calibre from http://calibre-ebook.com/ , you will get the great Sony hardware with the backing of a great cross platform software product. I am currently using a Sony PS-505 from 2007 and it is working as good as current gen Kindle.

    28. Re:That kinda sucks by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      What a weird thing to say.

      Indeed. Web server stats show hardly anyone browses the web on their Android tablet, so we would be expected to believe that people just buy them to use as doorstops or something.

      Back in the real world, I very rarely use the web browser on my Android tablet, because all the sites I normally use it to visit have apps.

    29. Re:That kinda sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Xiaomi does sell phones with MIUI those are incompatible forks of Android and often end up with google play services installed as that proprietary blob is required for many Android applications to work.

      Not that I'm aware of. Do you have any examples? I have a Xiaomi Redmi Note right here to test them...

      Android is open source and freely available to any manufacturer who wants to use and/or customize it.

      Windows is the same

      Are you serious?

      Google Services are necessary enough that most people need them on their phones,

      No they're not, my Redmi Note doesn't have them or need them.

    30. Re:That kinda sucks by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Where is it now?

      Eh, probably buying Procter & Gamble stock and trading in "secured" mortgages and other derivatives.. Rumor has it they still do okay in the professional and broadcast market. I wouldn't know, it's been a while...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    31. Re:That kinda sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that I'm aware of. Do you have any examples? I have a Xiaomi Redmi Note right here to test them...

      Yahoo Weather, FaceMap, uPackingList, Weather Services PRO, VoiceDirectory, WindFinder, FloatingBrowser, Golf Frontier, full!screen+, HoverBrowser, ZeroConf, Flash Search, Bonjour Browser, Tourist, myGuardian, FriendCaster, Parkdroid, Multitasker, and many, many, many more. The list is growing every day as apps look to implement new features only found in google play services.

      Are you serious?

      Yes, you quite clearly cut off the sentence, perhaps you are not familiar with punctuation in the English language. The issue in question is anti-trust, specifically the inclusion of IE in the product, and in the context of this discussion the ability for OEMs to customize/remove the component that creates the anti-trust issue is the same. Android being open source is irrelevant to the discussion.

      No they're not, my Redmi Note doesn't have them or need them.

      I am sure the Redmi Note itself doesnt need them but if you want to run the growing list of Android applications that rely on newer features of Android they are becoming more and more necessary. The writing's on the wall, if you want to run Android apps from here on in then google play services is more and more necessary.

    32. Re:That kinda sucks by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because Apple didn't use an uncommon, DRM-enabled format. Nope.

      Oh, wait. I'm being told that's exactly what they did. They sold their music in a format unsupported by any other portable player. And the first ipods only worked with Macs which, at the time, had a tiny percentage of the personal computer market.

      So I'm going to go out on a limb and say Sony's choice of format had nothing to do with their inability to corner the new portable audio market.

    33. Re:That kinda sucks by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Sony gotten bitten with Apple Envy. They pretty much invented portable music with the Walkman, re-invented it with the Discman but completely failed to capitalize it with digital music the way the iPod & iTunes did.

      Their downfall was trying to sucker the rest of the world with proprietary formats.

      http://games.slashdot.org/comm...

    34. Re:That kinda sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Do you understand what the term "Services" means? All of those apps you listed are links to back-end services provided by Google. They're necessary if you want to use Google's SERVICES, not if you want to use Android.

      Other providers can offer the same SERVICES and they can enable them on Android. You can use Bing search, you can use WeatherChina, whatever, you can use any other SERVICE provider that matches your needs.

      Do you know that most of those apps you listed are also available on iOS? They're not tied into Android, they're tied into Google SERVICES because the SERVICE is what people get the apps to use!

      Frankly, given a moment's thought, the whole premise of your argument is ridiculous. So why the scare mongering?

    35. Re:That kinda sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony can't, because they've pissed off so many people with their BS, their NIH and proprietary crap. The great unwashed avoid the brand outside of gaming and movies (which, let's be honest, no one even noticed what properties they own).

      When asked what camera, laptop, HDTV, speakers/amp/receiver to buy, Sony the name people are told to avoid by those tech types often consulted before purchases.

      Factor in the 10-20% Sony badge price hike mentality, and you can see why they are going to end up little more than a media corporation that makes profession gear too. Which is a shame, as their engineers are excellent. E.g. compare the guts of an XBone (plus external brick) to the more powerful PS4 with internal PSU.

    36. Re:That kinda sucks by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      That's why companies like Xiaomi (which recently rose to be the 5th largest phone maker in the world) can offer a very capable Android phone that has no Google software on it.

      while Xiaomi does sell phones with MIUI those are incompatible forks of Android and often end up with google play services installed as that proprietary blob is required for many Android applications to work.

      Android is open source and freely available to any manufacturer who wants to use and/or customize it.

      Windows is the same, no OEM ever needed to ship Windows systems with IE as the default browser.

      Google Services are useful enough that most people want them on their phones, but that doesn't preclude any other manufacturer from making very successful phones without them, as Xiaomi has demonstrated.

      Google Services are necessary enough that most people need them on their phones, much like IE6 has been necessary for a long time even though nothing ever precluded any OEM from making very successful PCs without it. The google service binary blob is where all the new innovative functionality goes, not into AOSP, so devices without it are becoming less and less compatible.

      I have a kindle fire tablet it runs Android with exactly zero google services.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    37. Re:That kinda sucks by kamapuaa · · Score: 2

      Minidisc and ATRAC pre-date MP3 as a format (1992 v 1995), so of course they didn't use the MP3 standard. Sony released MP3 players in the 90s, and while the software did indeed suck, it wasn't because of DRM. It didn't allow you to copy from MP3 player to computer, but that's not really a thing people want to do.

      Anyway, the idea that they could leverage their movie holdings counters the idea that using an established standard as a format would have helped them. If they have large holdings, the only way to leverage that would be to restrict these large holdings to a Sony-only format. Similarly, Sony owns the company that makes Uncharted, they makes games in a Sony-exclusive format. If they owned the company that made Uncharted, and then had them design games in some open gaming format that would work on any gaming system, that would not help Sony's hardware division.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    38. Re:That kinda sucks by umafuckit · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not fair: e-books were the one thing they didn't fuck with. Everything was e-pub, whereas Amazon was pushing their own weird formats. Can easily get content from different sources onto a Sony reader.

    39. Re:That kinda sucks by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That fell apart because Sony didn't anticipate what direction things would take, letting Apple overtake them along with just about everyone else.

      I don't think that's quite right. Sony did anticipate the direction things were going take, they just tried to control it too tightly and had an overinflated idea of their own power to steer things. I think the Sony Network Walkman predates the iPod. I had an NW-MS9 and I think in many ways it (and the earlier versions) were ahead of their time. Tiny, digital, sleek, even the name "Network" hints and some anticipation of a future of medialess distribution.

      However they utterly ballsed up the execution. Partly on the software side (the associated software was an absolute dog which seemed to go out of it's way to make things painful) but mostly because they were trying to own the future with their MagicGate DRM (which they even seemed to be trying to sell as something exciting for the consumer, though it was responsible for much of the pain in using the software) and codec restrictions.

      Sony saw the future, they just wanted to own it and in trying to do so produced something that served them more than it served the buyer.

      --
      Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    40. Re:That kinda sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows is the same, no OEM ever needed to ship Windows systems with IE as the default browser.

      Are you insane?

      The whole point of the United States v. Microsoft Corporation case was that Microsoft had claimed Windows and IE were now the same product, and were inextricably linked together! Here, read page 64...

      http://law.justia.com/cases/fe...

    41. Re:That kinda sucks by lrichardson · · Score: 1

      I thought Sony had learned their lesson after losing completely and utterly to VHS. Most would agree Betamax was a superior product, technically speaking, but being the 'better' product is no guarantee of success - pricing and marketing are critical. They priced themselves out of existence.

      Blu-ray was a much better roll-out. They enlisted major studios before the product hit the market. Licensed it to many other companies. And the pricing - while still not making most happy - is keeping them in the game. (And Toshiba's HD DVD died just like Betamax did before it)

      I had a pair of the Sony eReaders. They were great - insane battery life, excellent controls. And no stupid touch-screen - like any sane person wants fingerprints on their reading surface? OTOH, the software, as you said, sucked big-time. And then, both readers died within a few months of each other. And my customer experience with Sony pretty much drove me to the competition. And while that is a technically inferior model, I don't suffer from the software pains that Sony caused.

      My Sony library still exists - inaccessible - on my hard-drive, thanks to their !@#$ DRM insanity. Again, part of the friendly service from the Sony people - their advice began and ended with 'Buy a newer Sony eReader!'

    42. Re:That kinda sucks by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      The first iPods worked with everything that could mount an USB hard disk, because they nothing more than that!

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    43. Re:That kinda sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft had claimed Windows and IE were now the same product, and were inextricably linked together

      What they meant was that they were using the MSHTML component in multiple parts of Windows for rendering UI.
      When Windows 7 came out, they offered the option to remove the browser application (which uses the MSHTML component).

    44. Re: That kinda sucks by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Please; doing all that would have required a imagination and foresight (well, at least a little!).

    45. Re:That kinda sucks by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      They had to have their own everything, from music compression to memory cards.

      I believe they even had their own non *HCI compliant USB controller for a very brief while as well. That thing NEVER worked properly on any operating system. Pointless stupid proprietaryness for shits and grins.

      As for DRM it was their fault. They massively hobbled the minidisc with DRM and that inspired them to do all sorts of stupid shit like makeing it pointlessly limited, hobbling the few computer based drives.

      Oh and anyone remember their idiotic DRM labelled POS Atrac players from the early 00's? Those things had some stupid all-in-one encryption-compression-uploading program which only worked on some point release of Windows 98.

      Oh god they were awful.

      And then there was the Sony rootkit debacle.

      And the other-OS debacle.

      And so on and so forth.

      Sony is a company of two parts. The first is the hardware division which is frankly excellent. They consistently produce amazing stuff on a technical level of great quality. Then there's the part of the company which dispises their customers and believes that they should be punished and fucked over as much as possible. Anything those guys touches turns to utter shit (sort of like a shitty Midas touch).

      Things that they don't, e.g. their CCDs, are great.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    46. Re:That kinda sucks by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Google doesn't sell smartphones, nor does it control the dominant smartphone OS.

      In fact, Google does control the dominant smartphone OS. I'm a little confused as to why you would way otherwise.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    47. Re:That kinda sucks by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I had a pair of the Sony eReaders. They were great - insane battery life, excellent controls. And no stupid touch-screen - like any sane person wants fingerprints on their reading surface?

      A sane person would notice that you can't even see fingerprints on most modern displays in most lighting, especially the matte surface used on competent e-Book readers. Meanwhile, touch support makes the interface vastly better. I'm extra glad I didn't buy a Sony reader now. What crap.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    48. Re:That kinda sucks by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I don't think that's quite right. Sony did anticipate the direction things were going take, they just tried to control it too tightly and had an overinflated idea of their own power to steer things.

      Wait, what? No. Sony did not anticipate the fact that things would take an uncontrollable direction. End.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    49. Re:That kinda sucks by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      The first iPods worked with everything that could mount an USB hard disk, because they nothing more than that!

      No. The first ones were Mac only. And FireWire only. (And had less space than a Nomad and no wireless, and were thus 'lame'.)

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    50. Re:That kinda sucks by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1
      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    51. Re:That kinda sucks by JRV31 · · Score: 2

      I quit buying Sony products when they started putting viruses on CDs. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S...

    52. Re:That kinda sucks by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      And still required the proprietary database to be updated before the files would be available to play - you couldn't just dump the files on the disk and have them work.

    53. Re:That kinda sucks by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2

      Huh? The Epub format was released in 2007, while the Mobi format was released in 2000, and the Mobipocket company was purchased by Amazon in 2005.

      Hell, I was reading purchased eBooks in PDB format back in 2002, from ereader.com.

    54. Re:That kinda sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Android is open source, enough so that the non-Google version is growing faster than any other OS. In fact, there are more phones running the AOSP Android distro than there are iOS and Wwindows Phone combined. That's not a locked in platform!

    55. Re:That kinda sucks by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      It didn't allow you to copy from MP3 player to computer, but that's not really a thing people want to do.

      Of course people want to do that. During the iPod craze, it was quite common for someone, upon seeing that his friend had a large collection on their portable device, to ask if they could could copy the music from the iPod to their own computer.

    56. Re:That kinda sucks by pscottdv · · Score: 1

      Apple adapted. Sony didn't.

      --

      this signature has been removed due to a DMCA takedown notice

    57. Re:That kinda sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...They consistently produce amazing stuff on a technical level of great quality. Then there's the part of the company which dispises their customers and believes that they should be punished and fucked over as much as possible. Anything those guys touches turns to utter shit (sort of like a shitty Midas touch).

      Things that they don't, e.g. their CCDs, are great.

      So they have, really, a mierdas touch then?

    58. Re:That kinda sucks by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      I get what you are saying, entirely, but doesn't slashdot pedantry require I ask if it was really a 'proprietary database'? I thought it was a piece of xml? I'm pretty sure it is on the computer, but no idea what the file is on the iPod.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    59. Re:That kinda sucks by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      If its not documented, it doesn't matter what format its in - its proprietary.

    60. Re:That kinda sucks by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      True, the very very first one indeed had firewire, was not aware of that (actually, did not know fire wire already existed at that time).

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    61. Re:That kinda sucks by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      This exactly! Minidisc, for the time, was fantastic. But the silly DRM on it made it overly annoying. I remember the PC software had "library" counts, where you'd "check out" tracks to media, and had to check them in before you could move them somewhere else. Making multiple MDs with the same son? Impossible on their software. You had this device that could read, write, store songs with removable storage that sounded good, and packaged in a small fairly indestructable case--then crippled it with DRM to the point of wanting to throw it out the window. Nevermind how the software on the PC would often crash for no particular reason.
      Also: half the interesting models were only available in Japan.

    62. Re: That kinda sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, I love my pocket sony ereader and I boight BECAUSE it supported all the open formats.

    63. Re: That kinda sucks by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Anti-trust is about more than just monopoly. It's also about anti-competitive practices. When Microsoft got busted for anti-trust violations, there were other PC makers, other OS makers.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    64. Re:That kinda sucks by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Monopoly isn't the only anti-trust violation. Anti-competitive monopolistic practices are also a violation, as we saw with Microsoft.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    65. Re:That kinda sucks by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      No. They did what they always do, and tried to push a proprietary format (Minidisc and ATRAC) instead of embracing an established standard.

      It's worse than that; the MiniDisc came out long before the MP3 *was* established as the standard. (*) As I commented a while back, had Sony used the underlying technology of MiniDisc to its full potential and enabled the free exchange of "tracks"- in effect, ATRAC files (**)- when it came out in 1992, those may well have become the preferred format for exchanging music when the file format moved beyond the original devices.

      Instead, Sony not only didn't permit that, but they intentionally hobbled MiniDisc, rendering it little more than a next-generation cassette. Both in hardware and in software terms.

      It was only years *after* that, *after* MP3 had taken off that they were fighting a standard *they* had let become established, and *then* they tried to force ATRAC as a file format down people's throats, years too late. But I'm repeating what I said in the original linked comment- click the link above for more on that...

      (*) MP3 came out circa 1992 as well, as part of the MPEG-1 standard, but it wasn't for a number of years that it started to get used in its own right- around the time the Internet started taking off beyond academic circles- and it wasn't until the late-90s that it *really* took off. ATRAC could have pre-empted that.

      (**) I say "tracks", because in 1992 the home and portable audio markets still had little to do with (personal) computers, which weren't really powerful enough to process MP3s and the like then anyway. And it has to be remembered that the *general* public were nowhere near as comfortable with computers and computer concepts than they are today. So the ability to exchange "files" would have meant little to them, but the ability to share "tracks" or "songs" between MiniDisc devices would be something they could relate to.... even if such "tracks" *were* effectively just files!

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    66. Re:That kinda sucks by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Without even looking at this thing I bet its the exact same fails that Sony always pulls, proprietary formats, making everything go through Sony, overpriced hardware...correct?

      Sony has been throwing away killer tech products going all the way back to the Minidisc, which at the time had several orders of magnitude more storage than any MP3 player could muster but because Sony tried to lock everything down to the 50th power so that all discs would go through or from Sony nobody would support or put out content on the thing and it became totally worthless. I mean they owned the PMP market at the time with Walkman, they threw the market away. So I have NO doubt they tried to force everything through a poorly supported with lousy selection market, tried to screw anybody who offered to support the thing, and pissed it all away....standard Sony.

      BTW did it push a format nobody else used? That is also standard Sony, from memorystick to ATRAC there is nothing Sony loves more than their own format that nobody else will touch or support....LOL yep, nailed it, yet another format nobody else used LOL.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    67. Re:That kinda sucks by Smauler · · Score: 1

      It was a great replacement for cassettes (even if Sony and retailers initially made the mistake of pushing it as a competitor to the CD).

      They were a great replacement for CDs for audiobooks. The CD is diabolical for audiobooks... Robert Jordan's "Wheel of Time" series is 144 hours long, on audiobook, which makes CDs a little impractical.

    68. Re:That kinda sucks by umafuckit · · Score: 1

      Topaz.

    69. Re:That kinda sucks by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      True, the very very first one indeed had firewire, was not aware of that (actually, did not know fire wire already existed at that time).

      Don't you mean still around? That was when when it was on its deadbed.

    70. Re:That kinda sucks by vistic · · Score: 1

      The hardware seemed like it was pretty solid.
      But their interface on the readers themselves was pretty bad, and their desktop app to load books onto the reader was absolutely the worst.

    71. Re:That kinda sucks by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      My latest Mac still has fire wire ... I get a new one this week, I believe it has as well.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    72. Re:That kinda sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but "Services" are not necessarily Google web "Services", it includes APIs to access device resources. It is you who misunderstands what "services" means because you are constraining it to a very narrow definition.

      Do you know that most of those apps you listed are also available on iOS?

      Yes. For example the games use iOS's Game Center APIs, on Android they use Google Play Service's game APIs.

    73. Re:That kinda sucks by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Your link redirects to "monopoly", linking to that definition answers no questions as Amazon does not have a monopoly.

    74. Re:That kinda sucks by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Monopoly isn't the only anti-trust violation.

      Monopoly is *not* an anti-trust violation, it is not illegal to have a monopoly.

      Anti-competitive monopolistic practices are also a violation, as we saw with Microsoft.

      And to have anti-competitive monopolistic practices one must have a monopoly, as Microsoft did.

    75. Re:That kinda sucks by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      If its not documented, it doesn't matter what format its in - its proprietary.

      What if it's documented poorly or incorrectly?

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    76. Re:That kinda sucks by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

      Beta *is* superior (on paper at least). better tape speed, more video lines, better sound. but at the end, you could choose between a device that recorded 1.5 hours in stereo at top quality that cost a thousand bucks, or a JVC VHS deck that could do 4 hours in mono at 400$. Guess who won ?

      (I own both, and still swear at Beta's technical superiority, but VHS was the better choice)

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    77. Re:That kinda sucks by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

      "Blu-ray was a much better roll-out. They enlisted major studios before the product hit the market"

      BR had better DRM, that's what won the studios, not technical superiority. HDDVD was cheaper to manufacture as it could use existing DVD facilities

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    78. Re:That kinda sucks by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

      First iPods were Firewire only (iTunes was only available on Macs)

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    79. Re:That kinda sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a prs-505, but when I decided that newer models were enough faster(the early readers were pretty slow at page turning) the Sony's of the time were several hundred dollars more than Kobo, Nook, Kindle, etc. and offered FEWER features v. their competitors...

      Seems like sony readers are STILL assininely priced, so this is no surprise at all... there are MUCH better(and as good) readers out there now for much less! The build quality doesn't vary much between readers and SOny's been iffy on build quality for the last 15y or so anyways(sometimes they do a good job other times it's WTF?! Is this from the dollar store?), screens(there are 2 types of eink) are all the same in same type/size unless you get a lemon. Backlighting, and page turn/refresh speed is about the only thing that they can really compete on now and firmware

    80. Re:That kinda sucks by bdenton42 · · Score: 1

      My Sony library still exists - inaccessible - on my hard-drive, thanks to their !@#$ DRM insanity.

      You should have received an email from Sony earlier this year which included a link to transfer your library over to Kobo. About 95% of my library transferred and is now accessible from Kobo readers and apps.

  2. Nobody cares by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    The Sony Reader has been available at my grocery outlet for $50 for ages now. Nobody buys them.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Nobody cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Sony Reader has been available at my grocery outlet for $50 for ages now. Nobody buys them.

      Which outlet?

    2. Re:Nobody cares by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      This outlet. Has the Sony reader for $50. And it's had them for months, perhaps even over a year now. They're so crap they're pullbacks.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  3. They still do a reader for the professional market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They still have the Sony DPT-S1, a large format reader intended for the legal and other professional markets. Costly as heck though.

    It's a pity they're exiting the business. I much preferred the Sony devices to the Kindle both for the build quality and for its flexibility about formats, which is a must if you provide most of your own reading material instead of purchasing it through Amazon or the Sony ebook store. The remaining alternatives to the Kindle (Kobo and various janky Chinese and Russian devices) routinely fall short in one or the other. For example, the Kobo doesn't have PDF reflow.

  4. Loved me som PRS-505 by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

    My PRS-505 was great, it was a nice metal case, and it survived in my house where 3 Kindles met a cracked screen fate. Then its battery died and it is $30 for a new one.

    But I could see from day one that the library that Sony was offering was pretty much an irrelevancy. I am not sure that a single book they ever offered (not that I looked more than once or twice) caught my interest. I long thought that Sony should have gone enterprise with a very large screen (close to 8 1/2 x 11 as possible) for reading legal documents, documentation, and basically the size that every PDF is aimed at. Then they could have charged quite a bit of cash per unit and banked on the Sony name to give it respectability. So here comes a paperwhite in my future as nothing beats sitting in the sun near the ocean reading a good book.

    1. Re:Loved me som PRS-505 by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      I long thought that Sony should have gone enterprise with a very large screen (close to 8 1/2 x 11 as possible) for reading legal documents, documentation, and basically the size that every PDF is aimed at.

      They did

    2. Re:Loved me som PRS-505 by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I always wanted to try one of those for sheet music. The Sony nameplate always put me off, though. I keep hoping someone else makes a large screen PDF reader for the musician market. If it could run Musescore, I'd pre-order.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:Loved me som PRS-505 by MoonlessNights · · Score: 1

      I was very pleased with my 505, as well. I didn't bother with their software (I think it was Windows-only and was mainly used to buy DRM-encumbered stuff from their own store) but just using it as USB mass storage worked well enough for my purposes.

      I use it primarily for reading stuff from Project Gutenberg (since there is no DRM insanity) or taking other miscellaneous PDF and text content with me. The screen was quite good and sure beat reading any amount of text off of a glowing screen.

      It is too bad that they are leaving the market but I can tell my use-cases aren't those used by the masses so I am not too surprised.

    4. Re:Loved me som PRS-505 by CurryCamel · · Score: 1

      very large screen (close to 8 1/2 x 11 as possible) for reading legal documents, documentation, and basically the size that every PDF is aimed at

      8.27 Ã-- 11.7 would be even better!

    5. Re:Loved me som PRS-505 by CurryCamel · · Score: 1

      Teach me right not to c&p...

    6. Re:Loved me som PRS-505 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      210x297 would be perfect.

    7. Re:Loved me som PRS-505 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add in a bluetooth foot pedal for page changes and you've got a wonderful device!

    8. Re:Loved me som PRS-505 by iampiti · · Score: 1

      Not a finished product. But this http://youtu.be/ldvk_jAGjQI?t=... shows that there are other companies trying to make things with large e-ink screens.
      I'm not sure about screens so large but I have a 9.7 inch e-ink reader and I love it.

    9. Re:Loved me som PRS-505 by Markvs · · Score: 1

      I was very pleased with my 505, as well. I didn't bother with their software (I think it was Windows-only and was mainly used to buy DRM-encumbered stuff from their own store) but just using it as USB mass storage worked well enough for my purposes.

      I use it primarily for reading stuff from Project Gutenberg (since there is no DRM insanity) or taking other miscellaneous PDF and text content with me. The screen was quite good and sure beat reading any amount of text off of a glowing screen.

      It is too bad that they are leaving the market but I can tell my use-cases aren't those used by the masses so I am not too surprised.

      That's exactly what I did with our 505!
      My wife had it for just about a year and then wanted a Kindle so I loaded it up with about two dozen public domain books. It worked very well, and for my train ride into NYC was perfect because the battery life was adequate and the screen was non-glare and nigh indestructible no matter who hit it/pushed into me/knocked my bag. Heck, I fell asleep several times and dropped the thing hard. It didn't care.

      And since absolutely nobody ever wanted to steal it, that was a bonus too.

      --
      46. The Hobo smiles, his eyes glaze over, and he burps. "Beware the man who has lived longer than the Wasteland."
    10. Re:Loved me som PRS-505 by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

      Well in that case, they did a terrible job of marketing it as I would have been recommending this left and right had I known about it.

      Now I want one.

  5. Not sure about the hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a sony (PRS???); my wife has a kindle (paper white?).
    The kindle is just a much better experience.

    But my Sony has the advantage of being able to use ebooks from the local library.
    Oh and it has real buttons! no finger prints.

  6. That kinda sucks by Sable+Drakon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    No, though Sony could have pulled it out of the fire by partnering with a more respected content vendor, instead of trying to roll their own.

    --
    The Amarri pray for god, the Caldari pray for profit. the Gallente pray for peace, but the Minmatar pray their ships hol
  7. Re:They still do a reader for the professional mar by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 1

    Sad indeed. Sony should have learned something from their console business. It isn't so much the console as the games, it isn't so much the ereader as the ebooks. Now it seems their smartphone business is also going dodo.

    However I'm curious about this part of your post: "The remaining alternatives to the Kindle (Kobo and various janky Chinese and Russian devices) routinely fall short". Does Russia really manufacture anything besides spyware, rockets, and killing machines?

    For reference, here's what Obama said about Russia's manufacturing capability: "http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/08/03/us-ukraine-crisis-obama-idUSKBN0G30Q920140803"

  8. the market by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

    These devices cry out to be made by casino and found in ever gas station for $5.
    The Kindle with the keyboard pretty much perfected the device. It'd be nice if they got color figured out but I don't think anyone wants any more out of these devices. ok ok, put a solar cell on the back or something so you never have to charge it.

    1. Re:the market by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Having owned both the kindle with the keyboard, and the paperwhite, the keyboard had lots of issues. The keyboard wasted a ton of space despite being virtually never used, and the lighting solutions, while functional, could have looked better, and were not that battery efficient.

      I think my ideal kindle would be the Paperwhite, but with physical page turn buttons.

    2. Re:the market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most grown up books don't have pictures. Color is useless.

  9. It's a Dang Shame by Scorch_Mechanic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm kind of sad to see these devices fall off the market, though I can't say I didn't see it coming. They closed their "Sony Reader Store" for ebooks on the 20th of March, and sent another email detailing how to switch to Kobo. I've had a PRS-T1 for years now, and I love it. It's got a super nice feature where you could long-press a word you don't know and it would show you its meaning on its internal dictionary, or you could try searching google and wikipedia for it (if you were connected to wifi). It's so handy that when I switch back to regular books after a couple sessions with my ereader, I find myself trying to look up words in regular books by putting my finger on them. With the wifi off (or set to standby), the device supposedly will go for a month of regular (read: three or four hours daily) use. Never tested it, but boy it was nice, especially in an era of charge-nightly smartphones.

    By far the best feature was that my PRS-T1 seems to be perfectly sized for my hand. I can hold it in my left hand and swipe the screen (to change pages) with my thumb, comfortably. Combined with the fact that it only weighs a couple of ounces, and it's actually possible to do extremely comfortable one-handed reading. I should go plug in the thing. And find more books for it. And read more.

    Sigh.

    --
    You should turn signatures off.
    1. Re:It's a Dang Shame by LesFerg · · Score: 1

      I love my PRS-T1 too, but sadly the dictionary app got grundled and if I accidentally activate it the unit freezes and needs to be rebooted.

      It would be great if Sony could unlock these readers to allow us to add different reader apps. There are a few hack instructions on the web but they seem to apply to specific regional versions, so I don't want to brick the thing entirely by taking the risk.

      The main issue with putting a standard Android app on the T1 appears to be getting its display mode modified to remove scrolling and unnecessary animations, also they need to be lightweight apps that the slow CPU won't have fits on.

      --
      If I had a DeLorean... I would probably only drive it from time to time.
    2. Re:It's a Dang Shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's got a super nice feature where you could long-press a word you don't know and it would show you its meaning on its internal dictionary, or you could try searching google and wikipedia for it (if you were connected to wifi).

      The thing is that this "super nice" feature was implemented better on the Kindles (starting with their first gen - while the Sony e-readers of the time like the PRS-505 lacked one). And let's not talk about the fact that instead of just WiFi you can reach wikipedia (or any site if you have the Kindle Keyboard) from anywhere in the world via free 3G for life. And we haven't even discuss the real advantages of a Kindle over a PRS... In short if you like the sony ereader, you would probably go crazy with a Kindle (not Fire obviously) - I've had both.

    3. Re:It's a Dang Shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In FBreader, you select the word and a little button shows up to look it up in the dictionary.

    4. Re:It's a Dang Shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To stop the freezing delete every file and directory under READER/[...]/cache/books (google Dictionary Freeze SONY-PRS for more details). Worked like a charm for me.

    5. Re:It's a Dang Shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EVERY reader(excepting maybe the old jetbooks if we're talking about lookup while reading) has had a dictionary builtin for years now... IIRC my old kobo wifi(non-touch) got it added in a fw update at some point, but it was a PITA on a non-touch device...

      That said, every dictionary seems to be pretty limited IME, more like abridged dictionaries included. I miss my GINORMOUS Webster's unabridged dictionary that I had when I was a kid...

  10. It's e-reader, not ereader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take that fucking joint out of your mouth and do your job, for once.

  11. Re:They still do a reader for the professional mar by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    various janky Chinese and Russian devices

    Some of the Chinese ones aren't so "janky". I've seen Chinese-made ebook readers and tablets that were pretty darn nice, especially for the money.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  12. Re:They still do a reader for the professional mar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Does Russia really manufacture anything besides spyware,
    > rockets, and killing machines?

    check out YotaPhone.com.

    They stuck an e-ink screen on the back of a smartphone.

    Oh yeah, and Tetris.

    take that mr. troll!

  13. The Million Dollar Question by Guppy06 · · Score: 0

    DRM?

    1. Re:The Million Dollar Question by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not sure now, but a few years ago the Sony reader had less restrictions than most (if that's what you're implying) - since it was able to read multiple formats, and no DRM requirements, i made it my choice, and we have 3 of them (different generations) in the house now. Will miss future iterations!

    2. Re:The Million Dollar Question by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      I'm asking more about what happens to DRM'd content that was purchased from Sony's ebook store now that Sony is pulling out (e.g. authorization servers).

    3. Re:The Million Dollar Question by plover · · Score: 1

      Sony's strong push for DRM on everything from VHS to DAT to DVD to BluRay to Memory Stick has made me a Sony hater forever. They have lobbied for every industry restriction on fair use they can, and their campaign donations have funded congressional campaigns to advance their anti-fair-use agenda. I stopped buying their products in the 1990s, and I dropped my last aged Sony appliance off at the recycle center just a few weekends ago (a VCR that had been cluttering up the basement.) I can easily survive the rest of my days without Sony products, but I probably won't ever get my missing rights back.

      So it's kind of surprising to me to learn that their e-reader wasn't as crippled as their other devices; but then again it could have been completely DRM-free, and it would still have been too little, too late.

      --
      John
    4. Re:The Million Dollar Question by gsnedders · · Score: 2

      I have a PRS-T1. I've never bought anything from Sony's store (it only existed in the UK for a bit over two years, compared with the eight or so in the US!). To my knowledge, the device supports ADEPT only, and once the content is decrypted once it is forever accessible on that device unless you revoke it (there is no online checking). So, uh, at least content already readable will remain as such on devices already authorised.

      Also note that ADEPT has long been broken (it's got a good cryptographic basis, but there's almost no obfuscation in the system, so it's pretty useless as DRM), so it's /really not difficult/ to break content out.

      Quickly Googling makes it sound like customers had their accounts transferred over to Kobo (thereby losing no content), unless they opted out (and I haven't looked closely to see what happened in that case).

    5. Re:The Million Dollar Question by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 1

      You are as surprised as i was - it came as a shock to me that it was one of the least DRM'd readers out there!

    6. Re:The Million Dollar Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm asking more about what happens to DRM'd content that was purchased from Sony's ebook store now that Sony is pulling out (e.g. authorization servers).

      Buyers were given the option of transferring existing purchases to the Kobo store back in March.

      There was plenty of informational emails and warning reminders up until the eventual closure of the the Sony ebook store.

      I guess if they didn't transfer over the books are now gone. The purchases I had transferred over just fine.

      I was actually thinking it would be some long convoluted process to transfer, but it was a fairly simple process which was detailed in the emails.

    7. Re:The Million Dollar Question by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      I'm asking more about what happens to DRM'd content that was purchased from Sony's ebook store now that Sony is pulling out (e.g. authorization servers).

      Get Calibre, strip the DRM from all your Sony content, done.

      Note that that's what I did when I had a -505. Stripped the DRM from everything I bought, converted it to ePub format, and used it in that format.

      Now that my 505 has gone away, I use a Nook, and still strip the DRM with Calibre so I can load unencrypted ePubs....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    8. Re:The Million Dollar Question by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

      The Sony Reader PRS-T1 is pretty great, easily rooted and runs Android. Every further successive version Sony locked the device down further and further - with minimal hardware upgrades... Thus the T1 is the better choice: cheaper and more functional than the T2 or T3.

    9. Re:The Million Dollar Question by Bentbob · · Score: 1

      I own the T1 and prefer this to the T2/T3 due to the buttons being more comfortable to press. I don't know why anyone would think that buttons reminiscent of a web browser (and 3D with raised/sunken parts which make them uncomfortable to press frequently) was a good design idea.... though I still don't know why they thought adding that metal panel on the T1 (like a Bravia TV?) but at least it didn't affect using the T1.

  14. Second mouse... by jpellino · · Score: 0

    gets the cheese.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  15. PRS-500 owner by Ecuador · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I liked my PRS-500. I thought it was a decent device, with so-so software. I didn't use it much after the first month or so. Then I got a Kindle. It more than doubled my daily reading and I still carry it always with me, several years later. In retrospect, I realized that I liked the PRS-500 just because it had the first good display I had seen for reading, but the software implementation, both on the device and the PC/store part were the bare minimum to make an "ebook reader" type device. I saw that some PRS-500/505 users gave it a little more life with Calibre later on, but that was not thanks to Sony. So I don't know about "hardware genius", was it perhaps before serious competitors started coming with devices which were at least on-par hardware-wise but had some brilliant ideas and software behind them?

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    1. Re:PRS-500 owner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was starting to list the problems, but it became a long boring post, so I thought the resume was simple - in the end I did not use the PRS-500, while the Kindle increased my reading (and I always prefer e-books now). But if you want them listed, I will start with the most serious one: it was very hard to get content on the PRS-500. Legitimate content was scarce and not even cheaper than printed books, bought from an online store that was pretty lame and the actual software to load it on the device was horrid. Getting content otherwise was not that easy either, since the epubs I could find easily were not supported - Calibre helped later with that. Actually 2 years after release there was an update where you could send your PRS-500 to Sony US (good luck, e.g. I was in Europe by then) and it came back with epub support (and pdf reflow) - so imagine the poor design when the firmware was not even user upgradeable. In any case you needed a PC. You could not just go on vacation and just pick up your e-reader, you had to connect it to a pc and load it first. With the Kindle I don't even need internet, I go anywhere in the world and I can just browse Amazon (or the internet in general - I have the Keyboard version with free internet forever) seamlessly on 3G and either buy books or download from the large free collection. Or I can email books to my kindle if I prefer.
      Anyway, going on the on-device experience, it did not have any helpful features like a live dictionary (particularly great when reading books from another era), or even some sort of search function. I mean, seriously, no search function at all? Either on book collection/titles level or in book text, nothing! And for night reading, you had to buy a book light that was never good enough and ate batteries - I was reading about a supposed night light dock but it never actually appeared on the Sony website (as long as I looked for it) - whereas the Kindle made night reading so easy with the light that draws from its battery.
      See? Long post. And if I think about it there will be even more things I will remember, it is just such a long time since I used the Sony. But it was basically as I said: Wow, nice screen to read books on! Hmm, it takes a bit of work to actually use it. Then comes Kindle: Ah! That's how you do it...

    2. Re:PRS-500 owner by Jahta · · Score: 1

      I have a Sony reader too, which I still use and like a lot (I much prefer e-ink displays to backlit displays). But I never used the software that came with it. I got bitten before by the software that came with a Sony MP3 player which was a bloated piece of crap (I need a service running all the time just to occasionally copy music onto the player - really?)

      So I used Calibre from day one and, when the Sony eventually dies, I'll continue to use Calibre with whatever replaces it. There's a lot to be said for having the software independent of the device.

    3. Re:PRS-500 owner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calibre (at least in its current form) was not available for a while, so people who got a Sony early like me had to use the Sony Connect software. And the thing is that a Kindle, while it can also work with Calibre, DOESN'T NEED ANY SOFTWARE. I never connect it. If I am on my PC and I want to upload a book to the Kindle, I just email it (each kindle can get an email address) and wherever the device is, it gets it. Otherwise I browse Amazon directly on the kindle. Yeah, while I had the Sony I did not realize how much better the e-reader experience can be. And not to mention that the Sony was more expensive...

  16. For another $90 & 114gm... by jpellino · · Score: 1

    you get an iPad mini. Even Amazon figured this angle out. So this is not really surprising.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:For another $90 & 114gm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seriously think that an ipad mini is the alternative to a sony e-reader? Realy? It is like recommending an AC unit to someone who is asking about a refrigerator.

    2. Re:For another $90 & 114gm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you get an iPad mini. Even Amazon figured this angle out. So this is not really surprising.

      LOL, yeah, right. Show me an iPad Mini with an e-Paper display and I'll consider it.

  17. Dammit, I got fooled again. by cl3v3r · · Score: 2

    I thought minidisc was the bees knees. Then the Clie. Now the Sony E-reader bites the dust. I need to find a different brand :(

    1. Re:Dammit, I got fooled again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last sony device I bought was quite literally a walkman.

    2. Re:Dammit, I got fooled again. by lindseyp · · Score: 1

      Minindisc was awesome, it only failed outside Asia because in Europe and America, where generally cheaper products were the norm, people started ripping mp3s to CDR en-masse before MD players were cheap enough for mass market.

      The Clie was good, if a little fiddly. I knew a few people with those. Where *that* failed was sony's protectionis hogging of the Palm OS and getting usurped by Symbian and then Microsoft on smartphones until Apple took over the world.

      The e-reader was behind Amazon by far in terms of simplicity, wireless connectivity, and catalogue.

      In each case it seems Sony's made a product which enjoyed limited success amongst geeks willing to pay a premium for a couple of unique features, but failed to grasp mass market with affordable and easy-to-use products.

      Yup, you need a different brand. I'm thinking the same about Apple these days.

      --
      j'ai découvert une démonstration vraiment admirable (de ce théorème général) que cette si
  18. Happy PRS-T2 owner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a happy PRS-T2 owner, I use it at least twice per week to read magazines downloaded via Calibre, and sometimes books.

    It is light, has a nice design, and I can copy ebooks via USB (it shows up like a storage device), so I don't have to install any crappy software.

    It does have some shortcomings:
    - The microSD opening is covered by the case, which is a pain to remove
    - Can't associate with ad-hoc wifi networks
    - Sometimes bugs with refreshing the book catalog
    - The book catalog software sucks

    I wish I could just rsync or scp ebooks from my computer though, has anybody done this?

    All in all an excellent device. I would buy a PRS-T3 if it was rootable.

  19. so at what point by Osgeld · · Score: 2

    does sony discontinuing a done product line mean the end of a pioneering company?

    1. Re:so at what point by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      does sony discontinuing a done product line mean the end of a pioneering company?

      Sony hasn't pioneered anything since the CD, which Philips had to help them with. Everything else they've done has been biting someone else's shit. MOs were around before Minidisc. (IBM made the Cell, too; that was not produced on spec for Sony.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  20. One mistake Sony Made by dayton967 · · Score: 1

    The biggest mistakes Sony made, was not to take advantage of the educational market. There are many places that are moving from physical text books to electronic versions, Sony should have gotten in early with places like California to provide equipment for the students to access their books, but with the encumbrance created by Sony, and no large retailers in place they lost market share.

    1. Re:One mistake Sony Made by edremy · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I actually tested a couple of ereaders back in the dawn of the e-ink versions for educational use, including the Sony ones.

      They sucked. Utterly sucked. Equation formatting was laughably bad. Footnoting was dismal. Diagrams/graphs/pictures were far too small to see and magnify worked poorly (and of course there was no color). Writing text notes was a pain, and bookmarking was far too slow compared to page flipping. PDFs didn't format/reflow/do much of anything right.

      It's not all that much better today. I love my Kindle, but I read novels and the like on it. Professional reading is almost always paper text. I've done e-textbooks on an iPad which handles equations and diagrams better, but it's still clunky compared to paper.

      --
      "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
    2. Re:One mistake Sony Made by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      I use one of the big Kindles for viewing PDFs, which gets around the formatting issue, but that's about it as far as serious usage goes. To be honest, Amazon's big innovation wasn't improving the experience, but realising that people would put up with it if it cost as much as a Game Boy.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    3. Re:One mistake Sony Made by Kartu · · Score: 1

      Most of the points you've mentioned aren't really relevant.
      PDF created for A4/Letter page format was hard to read on a 6" screen? That's hardly surprising is it?

      As far as "re-flow" of PDFs goes (PDF is more of a set of instructions for the printer, than book format), Sony had the most advanced viewer, actually developed by Adobe.

      Notes/bookmarks - T1,T2,T3 are Android based, so choose your poison, for older versions there were various projects improving things.

    4. Re:One mistake Sony Made by iampiti · · Score: 1

      For the uses you mention, I agree with you that the typical 6 inch readers are garbage. But larger e-ink displays can be quite nice for that use case if the software is good enough.
      I have a 9.7 inch e-ink reader by Onyx and the hardware is pretty good. In that screen size many books with diagrams look nice and you can see a nice amount of information at once. Alas, the Onyx software is passable but could be much better. I wouldn't recomend this particular model for a demanding professional, but as I said , with the right software this kind of technology can be very nice. Have a look at this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... Imagine the software of the device shown in the beggining with the screen shown at about 2:35.

    5. Re:One mistake Sony Made by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Turns out you need some decent CPU power for that sort of stuff so ereaders that can handle complex PDFs have only been coming out for the last couple of years - and they are still slow for some PDF files. They don't have the processing power of an iPad or the top end android tablets.

  21. Sony is too selfish by sir-gold · · Score: 1

    Sony tries too hard to be completely in charge of every tiny aspect of their products, even when they lack the expertise to actually accomplish it.
    They could have partnered with Amazon or B&N right from the beginning, and they would have been a part of something big. But instead they have a tiny part of nothing, all to themselves.

    This is what happens when you don't share your toys Sony. Everyone eventually decides to get up and go play somewhere else.

    1. Re:Sony is too selfish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that Amazon and B&N are only big on the American market. Partnering with them would have had advantages on the U.S. market, but globally, it would have only complicated things.

    2. Re:Sony is too selfish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony partnered with Borders... In fact, they started selling them in Borders stores in 2006, 3 years before B&N came out with the Nook.

  22. Sony has been dead since the 90's by WCMI92 · · Score: 2

    In the 80's Sony was the gold standard for anything electronic. By the 90's they started living off their name and selling poorly made crap at a premium price. By the 2000's that started catching up to them.

    In the 2010's they have become irrelevant.

    Sony is soon to follow Radio Shack into history.

    --
    Corporatism != Free Market
    1. Re:Sony has been dead since the 90's by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Sony is hardly going to disappear; their huge presence as a media company (movies and music) will guarantee that. And they have pockets of excellence in hardware. Their still and video cameras have been very nice ever since they started supporting standard SD cards in addition to MemoryStick. Their phone division has stepped up its game and is building some excellent Android devices. Their home audio equipment is also good, though that's not a growth market. The PS4 is doing OK. And they make outstanding 4K projectors for theater use.

      But the company is doing badly in a lot of markets that used to be strong points for them. They have abandoned desktop and laptop computers, and now e-readers. They are nearly irrelevant in portable audio. Television was once their flagship product, but they are now nearly invisible in the TV market except for the ultra-high-end niche.

      What we are seeing now is Sony reconfiguring itself to be a company that can survive. Getting out of markets where they can no longer be competitive is part of that. It is true that they COULD have been strong in some of those markets had they made better products and not insisted on over-controlling DRM. But Sony is a long way from dead, unlike Radio Shack. (Radio Shack is doing the right things now - lessening their dependence on postpaid phones while staying big in prepaid, and making a push for the maker market - but it's probably five years too late; they no longer have the necessary financial reserves to execute their current plan.)

  23. They really messed up PRS-T3 by m00sh · · Score: 1

    I have the Sony PRS-T2 and it was really good for its time. However, Sony really fluffed PRS-T3 by not having a front light.

    However, I think rather than Sony's hardware, it was the software that was better, esp for pdf in this generation. Kobo hardware was better - the aura and aura hd are one step ahead of kindles in hardware but one step behind everyone else.

    Finally Sony was the only one with actual buttons. I was really hoping Sony would bring a new reader with frontlight and page turn buttons.

    The real money to be made is in selling books and media rather than hardware. So, makes sense Sony bowed out because they aren't in the business of selling books.

  24. Re:They still do a reader for the professional mar by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    Well, that's just it. They are withdrawing from the consumer market and sticking with the way overpriced professional market. And besides, their real money is in heavy industry. This entertainment stuff is chump change.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  25. They should... by Torp · · Score: 1

    ... put the PS4 designers in charge of all their product lines. And maybe the ones doing the mobile phones, which aren't bad for cheap Androids. And fire all the rest.

    --
    I apologize for the lack of a signature.
  26. Why is Sony doing so badly by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    Look at that thing. It's smart, stylish, with a convenient touch screen interface and comes in a range of colours, and a recognised brand. It should do at least as well as the other ebook readers at the same price.

    There's somethign really really wrong in Sony that the company is failing to address. Without their video games division I'd be surprised if the company remained afloat at all.

  27. Prime Reason Not to Buy eBooks by pubwvj · · Score: 2

    This is the reason not to buy eBooks. Bye-bye library collection. Bother.

    1. Re:Prime Reason Not to Buy eBooks by hendrips · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sometimes it seems like the people on this site have a reflex hatred of anything digital that simply bypasses rational thought or reading comprehension. Even a small amount of investigation would have shown you that:

      -Sony e-readers already in existence won't stop working or lose access to the books that the owners have already downloaded.
      -It's trivially easy to put books from sources other than Sony on their e-reader. PDF's, epubs, etc. aren't going anywhere.
      -Even if someone did buy books from Sony, their account is being transferred to Kobo, and they will continue to be able to download any book they have purchased.
      -And even if all of the above fails, the DRM on Sony's ebooks can (at least, according to other posters - I haven't tried) be broken pretty easily by an average person.

      So no, exactly no one has said bye-bye to their book collection. Please don't spread misinformation.

    2. Re:Prime Reason Not to Buy eBooks by pubwvj · · Score: 2

      Sometimes people on this site seem to have an instinctual fan-boy reflex that by-passes rational thought. Even a small amount of thought would point out:

      -The Sony eReaders will die eventually - Bye-bye books for most people who aren't sophisticated enough to transfer to other formats and devices.
      -DRM will prevent a lot of people, the majority of people, from accessing their documents. bye-bye books!

      It would be really nice if fan-boys or stooges and plants for Sony didn't spread misinformation.

    3. Re:Prime Reason Not to Buy eBooks by hendrips · · Score: 1

      Hang on - I'm implicitly encouraging people to crack Sony's copy protection on a product that they don't even sell anymore, and that makes me a plant from Sony? I don't think they're getting much value for what they're paying me!

      In case you actually were wondering (I'm sure you weren't), I read my ebooks using the Kindle for PC software on my Surface Pro. My rough count is that I have about 200 books at the moment, of which about half are free public domain books, and another quarter are DRM-free books, most from sources other than Amazon. My fanboyism must be slipping, I guess.

  28. It's simply that hw manufacturer cannot compete by Kartu · · Score: 1

    It's simply that hw manufacturer cannot compete vs subsidized hardware.
    Build quality might be subjective, but Sony's readers are also so much less restrictive that Kindle's in terms of features/formats.

    1. Re:It's simply that hw manufacturer cannot compete by hendrips · · Score: 1

      How is Amazon's hardware restrictive? The majority of the books on my Kindle are not from Amazon's store, and aren't .azw files (mostly .mobi, and a few pdfs). I mean, I understand that the Kindle won't support .epub, but I feel like there's a major difference between "doesn't support one particular popular format but does support most others" and "only supports one proprietary format." Besides, if you have an .epub without DRM it only takes a few seconds to convert it to a format that a Kindle can read.

  29. First? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

    Perhaps I have the dates wrong, but I was under the impression that Sony launched their first eInk reader in September 2006, two months after the iRex iLiad was launched (July 2006).

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  30. SONY might be done by gelfling · · Score: 1

    SONY is like Sears or Atari. Just one long stream of failure after failure until they run out of things to sell off. Then they're done as anything other than a motion picture distributor.

  31. This raises some questions by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    1 - will there be cheap sales of Sony e-readers now?

    2 - If so, what can you do with a PRS T-3 without the sony store? Can you root it? Can you side-load content?

    1. Re:This raises some questions by DadLeopard · · Score: 1

      Had a PRS-505, now have a PRS-T1, never used the Sony store after the original registration. All my content is in epub, pdf, rtf, etc. all acquired from places like baenebooks.com kobo.com and my public library. Get Calibre to use as your ebook library software and it will manage your books on your computer and your Sony PRS-T3. The biggest advantage to the Sony Readers that no one mentions is the ability to sort by more than the title of the books, When you have 500+ books on the Reader, it is nice to be able to sort by series, (which the Sony calls Collections), author and date added as well as just the title.

  32. Re:They still do a reader for the professional mar by dbIII · · Score: 1

    The Boox is very good with PDFs and can even do CBR format.

  33. Re:They still do a reader for the professional mar by rhsanborn · · Score: 1

    The device was great, but no one really buys a Kindle for the device. They buy it for convenience and content. The Sony ebook store had a terrible selection. Worse, you had to buy it on the computer and transfer it to your device. Nirvana is achieved when you can pick up your ereader, decide you want a book, and can complete the selection and sale immediately. That's why Amazon was willing to eat the cost of the cell subscriptions, because it meant people could complete a purchase when they wanted, not when it was logistically feasible. That's become easier now with more ubiquitous wifi, but Amazon won on content and ease of availability.

    I still own a PRS-505 and it's a wonderful device, especially paired with Calibre, but it's used almost exclusively to lend to people while I used my Kindle Paperwhite.

  34. Re:They still do a reader for the professional mar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Boox is very good with PDFs and can even do CBR format.

    Some Onyx Boox series still use glass substrate displays that are mounted in a way that they shatter easily, which is unforgivable for a consumer device. (Ask me how I found out.)

    I won't actively disrecommend them but it would be best to be sure that whichever model you're considering has a plastic substrate display.

  35. They're failing at UX, bigtime. by aussersterne · · Score: 1

    They're still working 20 years behind everyone else, caught in a love for industrial and UI (as opposed to UX) design.

    They don't get the "ecosystem" concept. In fact, they actively fight it while everyone else is trying to build it.

    Everyone else has known for a decade at least that every product is part of a service.

    Sony is still busy thinking that every service is part of a product.

    Others: The product is one of our service's features/facets.
    Sony: The service is one of our product's features/facets.

    So their devices are technically great, but too often they come narrowly bound to half-assed services that have only seen enough investment to allow the product to ship with the basic claim that it's functional. As a result, you can't actually practically use their products for nearly as much or nearly as well as competing products. The content isn't there. The accessories aren't there. The third parties aren't there. The fellow users interacting aren't there. Other devices may be technically inferior, but that have a large ecosystem of content, enthusiasts, third-party developers, accessories, etc. behind them.

    While everybody else is practically begging the world, "Please, community! Embrace our product and take it in organically emerging directions!," Sony is busy saying "Get lost, community! We're in control here; stop trying to take this in non-approved directions!"

    Other tech companies would kill to get a community going. Sony would kill anyone that claims to be a part of a "community" around their product.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    1. Re:They're failing at UX, bigtime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While everybody else is practically begging the world, "Please, community! Embrace our product and take it in organically emerging directions!," Sony is busy saying "Get lost, community! We're in control here; stop trying to take this in non-approved directions!"

      Laughable. We have more control, more cloud and SaaS offerings, more lock-in than ever before.

      If you think perpetually renting access to things you never are allowed to own is embracing the community, your community does need to die.

      The "community" IS the product. The "community" is just X amount of eyeballs, sold to another company.

      What crazy world do you live in where communities are valued for what you can give them instead of what you can get for them?

      You really think "communities" are built for any reason besides to be sold?

      The "everyone else" is no different than Sony, their methods may differ, but it is the same model.

      Your delusion that a "service" is another besides lifelong lock-in and taking your data hostage by giving control to outside parties is not
      something to be emulated. You can argue not every "service" works like that, but there is no guarantee. You are asking us to trust entities
      that time and time again have shown they cannot be.

  36. Re:They still do a reader for the professional mar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my kindle has never touched amazon since i got it. wifi off.
    use it like a usb drive. dump a bunch of books to it. and it just works. and keeps working.

    calibre is all i need.

  37. The parent's question was not a moral one, by aussersterne · · Score: 1

    so spare me the politics.

    It was "Why is Sony failing?"

    The reason that sony is failing is that you can buy (or, in your terms, "rent") more content, more accessories, more apps, more of everything, and do so more conveniently, from competitors products. The device itself is not the failing; it is that the usefulness of the device is diminished by the relative lack of things to do with it, and the lack of ways to do so conveniently.

    It matters not at all what you think of the big picture to answer the posed question; it is simply that whatever Amazon offers, Sony offers *less* of it—not in the device hardware, but in everything that surrounds the device hardware, in the ways that the device hardware can be used. Sony's hardware is thus less useful, not for reasons relating to hardware or UI design, but for reasons relating to business relationships, customer-facing opportunity structure, and so on.

    The politics of DRM and so on is an important discussion to have in our political life, but the fact that Amazon offers DRMed books has little to do with why Sony is failing (Sony, of course, offered the same—just fewer of them, with fewer ways to get them on the device, and fewer accessories to use with it).

    Yes, the community is the product—it is also the product that the community consumes. Yes, publishers and manufacturers skim value off the top of that circular transaction. That is, as you point out, the business model.

    And what I am saying is that that is the *dominant* business model right now, and that Sony sucked at it in comparison to Amazon or even to Barnes and Noble.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
  38. PRS-500 owner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So which features does the kindle have that the prs-500 doesn't? You're just saying it sucks without giving a single argument.

  39. Sony PRS T1 or Nook HD for Android "goodness" by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

    Note the Nook is also easily rooted, though not quite as necessary now as the Nook HD has Google Play pre-installed -- even on the refurb/pre-owned models on Amazon.

  40. Re:They still do a reader for the professional mar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Nirvana is achieved when you can pick up your ereader, decide you want a book, and can complete the selection and sale immediately.

    Yech. The whole point of picking a non-Amazon device is to *not* buy ebooks. There's a lifetime of free (non-pirated) reading material available on the internet like Project Gutenberg, the Baen Free Library, and so forth.

  41. Re:They still do a reader for the professional mar by dbIII · · Score: 1

    As far as I know only LG makes the plastic display and only the Russian vendor Wexler has a consumer device built around it - the "FlexOne", which looks nice but it's nowhere near as large as the 9.7 inch Boox.
    So IMHO the answer is to keep treating the larger displays like glass. While I would like the big Sony display I can just turn my Boox sideways and look at half of a page at a time.