Slashdot Mirror
Big Bang Actors To Earn $1M Per Episode
Cludge (981852) writes with a snippet from the BBC: "And rich they will be: With The Big Bang Theory commissioned until 2017, the show's three biggest names, Jim Parsons (Sheldon), Johnny Galecki (Leonard) and Kaley Cuoco (Penny) are guaranteed to earn $72m (£42.6m) each over the next three seasons. Unsurprisingly, the cost of producing the sitcom has spiraled." I wonder what that works out per line?
The argument against is that BBT is, essentially, Nerd Blackface.
The argument for BBT is that the material and situations are relateable, especially with the mainstreaming of geek culture (Dr. Who, BSG, Marvel films).
Meh. It's funny. I watch. I read the vanity card at the end. I think they're all good actors - at least within the scope of the show.
They've made quite clear that Sheldon is paid well by the university, and that he's got piles of un-cashed checks laying around.
Only Penny is ever in need of cash.
Seinfeld was in the $600,000 to $1,000,000 range (depending on the actor) back in the late 90's
I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
considering Miami Vice was pulling these kinds of numbers in the '80s. Granted, it was only for one actor, but still.
Yes, and if you remember, the other lead actor was paid less well because he was rather less white, and he was rather pissed off about it, understandably.
These star actors cost a lot, yes, but they also brought in a lot of money. So I suppose it was, and still is a sound investment.
"A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
How are they overpaid? The production company and the network make millions off of this show. The actors are (obviously) an integral part of the success of the show, and therefore the revenue, so why not pay them whatever they can negotiate?
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work. I want to achieve it by not dying. - Woody Allen
Just accept on faith that the market valuation is infallible by definition, it makes everything so much simpler that way.
After all... it's a show about and for people and culture who promote file sharing. Sorry, piracy.
Checking Piratebay it is obvious that it is heavily shared, with thousands of seeds.
Why isn't this show being canceled due to everyone involved with making of it dying from starvation?
I was told that sharing... sorry, pirating of video directly hurts people who make these shows.
I demand that someone does something about it!
Like... take them all behind the shed and shoot them in the head.
Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
Given that the show is going into season 8, I wouldn't be too surprised if it went downhill from here, like it usually happens to long running sitcoms. It's not like money will reflect the quality of acting.
I assumed it was a laugh track too, but they film in front of a live audience.
You never know. He might have and those are just pay stubs. It all could just be a colossal misunderstanding on this part.
A fictional character can be as much of a dufus as the rest of us.
A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
This is the first time I've seen (and hopefully the last) BBT discussed on /.
moox. for a new generation.
I don't get the controversy. I like the show. It makes me laugh. I don't care what the actors get paid. It's none of my business. I think the comparisons to "black face" are in error. Poking fun at people because of their behavior is not the same as poking fun at people because of their skin color. It's just a sitcom. They come and go. It hasn't jumped the shark yet (not for me, anyway). When it does I'll probably stop watching. And if CBS should cancel it tomorrow, I won't care. My life does not revolve around characters on a tv show, nor does it revolve around the actors and writers. They're getting $1million per show... yawn.
Proverbs 21:19
Yes, and if you remember, the other lead actor was paid less well because he was rather less white
If you think PMT was less-well-paid because he wasn't white, then you don't understand anything about TV. If people tuned in to watch PMT more than Don Johnson, he would have been paid more than Don Johnson. The truth is, Don Johnson and hot girls in bikinis were about the only reasons to tune into that show. Just about any decent actor (white or not) could have played Tubbs, and we wouldn't have cared.
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work. I want to achieve it by not dying. - Woody Allen
Don Johnson had actually been on one good movie. 'A Boy and His Dog'.
So he rated more.
John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
And the show really isn't that funny.
Penny has nice tits though.
When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
Sheldon doesn't trust banks because he believes that ATM machines will be the first wave of the robot uprising.
Only Penny is ever in need of cash.
OMG, so that's why they named her Penny, rather than something like Trillian.
Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
Why the HELL doesn't Sheldon just set up autodeposit?!?
Maybe all those uncashed checks are $ 2.56 each, from Dr. Knuth.
Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
Santa isn't real, but I still like to open presents.
Game: Player 'Donald J Trump' now has AI skill level 'experimental'.
I play hockey with a bunch of high IQ programmers and scientists. We drink beer after in the parking lot and talk about women, technology, and too much about Marvel Comic movies. Those are the intelligent people I hang around with. Sure, I also know flabby, ugly, borderline Asperger's nerds. But why are the only smart people we see in the media modeled on them?
If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
"so this obviously (well, maybe not to you) makes great sense for all parties involved." except the consumer. Anyone who buys a product, regardless if the watch the show, pays and gets no say.
I wanted to break this out because I find it fascinating that you feel this way.
Ignoring the fact that you can vote with your dollars and not buy said product, how exactly do you feel that you are entitled to a say in how a company that you buy a product from spends its money? The vast majority of companies are not monopolies (if they were, they wouldn't need to advertise so much) so you have a choice when you buy a product. For most essentials you can even choose generics that don't have much ad cost built into them.
I mean, do you believe your employer should be given a say in how you spend your pay? They are paying you for your labor in the same way you are paying a company for a product. Do you think they should be able to tell you how much to spend on beer? Criticize you for buying too fancy a car? Or maybe the customers of your employer should be allowed to criticize them for paying you what they consider too much.
I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
The difference - to me anyway - is that fake tits look good under clothes but when you unwrap them they look wrong, move wrong - and most important of all - feel wrong. It's like getting a beautifully wrapped present with a cheap toy inside. Disappointing.
Unless you believe you have a realistic chance of "unwrapping" Kaley Cuoco's tits, I'm not sure there's any distinction to be made...
You are using the wrong measure.
The cast of BBT are not being paid that much because they are good at acting.
They are being paid that much because collectively, they enable the BBT show to continue being produced, which show generates substantial amounts of income for their corporate overlords through advertising, merchandising, syndication and whatnot.
The "hundreds of thousands" of other better actors you allude to sadly do not have this earning potential and hence, do not have this kind of paycheck.
Quality of acting is irrelevant.