Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Record Quantum Behavior of Electrons Via Laser Lights

An anonymous reader writes in with news about a breakthrough in recording quantum behavior in electrons. A group of researchers has said that they have come up with a new method to record and control electron behavior at the quantum mechanical level. The research team, headed by the scientists at the University of Chicago, used laser lights in ultra-fast pulses for the experiment. The laser light controlled the quantum state of electrons. It contained inside nanoscale defects in a diamond. The researchers observed changes in that electron over a time period. They focused on the quantum mechanical property of electrons known as spin. Lead author David Awschalom, a molecular engineering professor at a university in Chicago, said, "These defects have attracted great interest of the scientists over the past decade. They provide a test-bed system for developing semiconductor quantum bits as well as nanoscale sensors."

17 of 33 comments (clear)

  1. 4.4 trillion by emagery · · Score: 2

    Now just combine this, in some way, with that new 4.4 trillion FPS camera some other scientists recently invented.

    1. Re:4.4 trillion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Okay, we duct taped them together. Now what?

      And before you ask, no, the tape isn't sticking to the shark very well.

  2. Total information awareness by Smallpond · · Score: 1

    We now can tell exactly how fast this electron is going. Unfortunately, now we can't find it.

  3. Is it just me? by caffeinated_bunsen · · Score: 1

    Or does anybody else feel like the summary came straight from the Simple English Wikipedia?

    --

    Bugrit! Millenium hand and shrimp!
    1. Re:Is it just me? by Netdoctor · · Score: 2

      No, it's not just you. It's horribly written.

      From the comments:

      Dave Shepherd 2 hours ago

      This article is poorly written. It is full of grammatical errors and does not read well. The news item deserves better, as do the researchers.

    2. Re:Is it just me? by darenw · · Score: 2

      How does one downvote, flag, or throw a rotten tomato at this badly written submission? It must be removed so that Slashdot's high reputation for accuracy, insight, and scientific relevance is not tarnished.

    3. Re:Is it just me? by darenw · · Score: 2

      Ooop, sorry for my doing at good english! I meanted to say:

      How one to downvote, flag, and throw it rotten tomato to at badly writtened submission? It must. Be removed Slashdot's highly reputatation for the accuracy, incite, and scietific relevance not isn't tarnished.

  4. Heisenberg? by MorphOSX · · Score: 1

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't the act of observing the quantum behavior of the electron necessarily change it? I thought one of the fuzzy things about anything "quantum", other than "quantum bullshit", was that its state/behavior is not finite unless observed directly, thus causing it to collapse into a specific state? Or do I have that wrong?

  5. "Laser Light"? by Forthan+Red · · Score: 2

    Anyone else find the term "laser light" to be odd, or at least redundant? Last time I checked, the "L" in laser stood for "Light". It's a bit like calling an ATM an "ATM machine", or when TV's Mr. Monk said, "it made me LOL out loud."

    1. Re:"Laser Light"? by StripedCow · · Score: 2

      An "ATM machine" is a machine from which you can withdraw ATMs.

      --
      If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
    2. Re:"Laser Light"? by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      It's just a typical case of PNS syndrome.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    3. Re:"Laser Light"? by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 1

      They do it in order to address an audience with a varying background. For this purpose it is actually an excellent literary technique since most readers who are familiar with the subject will just gloss it over while the laymen are still able to get the gist of things.

      --
      All rites reversed 2010
    4. Re:"Laser Light"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I believe "LASER" stands for "Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation".

      So "laser" would be a process, not the light created, and "the laser" is the apparatus that uses that process, and "laser light" is the light emitted by the laser.

  6. On the matter of electrons by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Electrons have 'spin'. Electrons also have an electric field. Do electrons have a magnetic field? - Yes they do. An electron's magnetic field is its 'spin'.

    Why even call it 'spin'? Back in the day the function of magnetism was explained with the 'turtles all the way down' analogy of 'elementary magnets' meaning they didn't have a clue and possibly did not want to admit ignorance.

    Today we know that this elementary magnet is the property of an electron spinning on an axis just like a planet does. It can not spin faster or slower, but it can turn to any alignment. When a bunch of electrons line up their axis of spin in this way (and maintain their position), what we get is of course a proper magnet. - Magnetism is therefore a quantum effect on a macroscopic scale.

    Magnets interact with bosons, which in lasers do their thing by depleting entropy so that space is bent, aligning the emission of photonic bosons. Emission of photons from electrons is usually in a random direction, but lasers do things differently. - Magnets attract or repulse by bending space because their homogeneous ferromagnetic material locally depletes entropy. The Higgs particle, a boson famous for is ability to cause gravity, bends space too.

    The old vestiges of ignorance persist however, among popular press and celebrity scientists who have followers not because of their theories but because of their charisma. It's eppur si muove all over again, though he Vatican did admit they made a mistake after 350 years...

    --
    All rites reversed 2010
    1. Re:On the matter of electrons by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 1

      Writing in mild anger, I did not expect a reply, so thanks!

      I should have specified 'magnetism in permanent magnet'.

      Stimulated emission is the interaction of an incoming photon with the electron before and during transition, not with the soon to be emitted photon.

      I read a claim on a .edu that an incident photon can stimulate emission even before it passes an electron. Then when I parroted this information, someone said this was false. - As a student I did not anticipate controversy.

      Magnetic fields will contribute to local energy density and bend space gravitationally as a result as would anything else that contributes to mass-energy density.

      I'm referring to the much stronger force which you can vividly feel when you hold one magnet in each of your hands and move them close to each other. - I intended to make an extraordinary claim by saying that this is bending space the same way as gravity bends space. I really had forgotten about Kaluza-Klein, but now I might have have developed the intuition to understand it better. - You're saying the LHC doesn't say booh or baah about KK? I find that extraordinary, too.

      I intended to write popular science to an audience of laymen, so I skipped some facts. I think it is important for laymen to know that photons are bosons and so are Higgs particles.

      All the best to you!

      --
      All rites reversed 2010
  7. By definition, isn't this impossible??? by franblets · · Score: 1

    Isn't it assumed that the state changes on observation?

    1. Re:By definition, isn't this impossible??? by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

      Someone won a nobel 2 years ago for using a laser to "observe" the electron vector without influencing anything.