Slashdot Mirror


HP Recalls 6 Million Power Cables Over Fire Hazard

Via the Consumerist comes news that HP is recalling power cables after about 30 reports that they were melting from regular use. From the article: Hewlett-Packard received 29 reports of the melting or charring power cords, two that included claims of minor burns and 13 claims of minor property damage. The black power cords were distributed with HP and Compaq notebook and mini notebook computers and with AC adapter-powered accessories such as docking stations and have an "LS-15" molded mark on the AC adapter. About 5.6 million power cords were sold in the United States, while 446,700 were sold in Canada from September 2010 to June 2012 at electronic stores and hp.com.

137 comments

  1. Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How do you fuck something like that up?

    1. Re:Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by Narcocide · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Outsourcing.

    2. Re:Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too much power! not enough shielding.

    3. Re:Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by havana9 · · Score: 1

      THe cable manufacturer got a spec, then passed the order to a subcontractor. The subcontractor tried to shave costs buying cheaper cables. Cheaper cable while sold as on spec, actually were made under spec, say with tinned aluminium instead of tinned copper.
      The cables pass quality checks, because maybe are lax, and then you have a low quality cable that will work most of the time. Sometimes doesn't work, in other word the last quality inspection is made unknowingly by the buyer...

    4. Re:Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 4, Informative

      With the limited info I have I would guess either a cheapskate manufacturer that tried to pass the wrong gauge of cable as the correct one or a crappy connection between a plug and the cable.
      In both cases the cable can't handle the current in a hot room and that could cause the insulation to melt. Especially when the cable is buried under a stack of nice insulating and flammable paper. Molten insulation doesn't stay in it's place, cables connect, short circuit and with the hot insulation (hot means more easily flammable) a flame is born.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    5. Re:Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by Monoman · · Score: 2

      Outsourcing to the lowest bidder and then not adequately sampling items to verify they were made to spec.

      --
      Keep the Classic Slashdot.
    6. Re:Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just read the label on a 90W laptop PSU: It draws less than 2A at 100V mains side. I have thin USB cables which can handle more than 2A. How shitty does a cable have to be to melt from less than 2A?

    7. Re:Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also overheating are Bill and Dave's graves, with all the friction from the spinning.

    8. Re:Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by some+old+guy · · Score: 2

      Probably junction resistance (cold solder) or corrosion (shitty base alloy or plating).

      --
      Scruting the inscrutable for over 50 years.
    9. Re:Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mains cable is normally rated for the fuse upstream, to prevent the cable from catching fire during overcurrent. Technically there would be no problems using the USB cable gauge for your laptop power adapter (maybe thicker insulation is needed). I guess here there is a bad connection somewhere that results in a high resistive loss.

    10. Re:Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Outsourcing.

      Power cables are always outsourced.

    11. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by geekmux · · Score: 1

      As long as money saved through outsourcing > cost of recall/lawsuits, HP wins.

      They win?

      Rather screwed-up mentality when and where the end result of faulty hardware is someone's life being taken.

      Nothing new. Insurance companies prove it every single day. Life is but a numbers game.

    12. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by j235 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      ... and Americans "yanks". Again, nobody gets offended, but there's probably more reason to be offended by those terms than by "pakis".

      Yes I'm offended by this. I'm an American, but I'm not a Yankee, thank you very much.

    13. Re:Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

      Made in China. Saving money is the key here, not quality and definitely not safety.

    14. Re:Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by sjwt · · Score: 0

      My guess is induction at the 240/120 into the PSU end.

      --
      You have 5 Moderator Points!
      Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
    15. Re:Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Outsourcing and quality control are separate things, unless you are convinced that things can only be built right in your country.

    16. Re:Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      The cables pass quality checks, because maybe are lax

      The root problem.

      Nothing else you wrote matters if the quality checks are good.

    17. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Informative

      How is "Pakis" offensive? It is clearly an abbreviation of "Pakistanis", and I assume you don't find the full word offensive.

      Because, as far as I've ever heard it, it's only ever used as a pejorative term, and definitely not as an endearing shortening of the word.

      I have never heard it as anything but derogatory.

      It's offensive, because that's how it's used.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    18. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes 'Paki' is short for Pakistani, but 'Paki' is actually a racial slur against Indians and is commonly used in the UK.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hm0RqN_1VO8 (NSFW)

      It's like calling an Aussie a Kiwi... if their countries were threatening nuclear launches against each other.

    19. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot Abos

    20. Re:Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No surprise there, Apple had a recall because the strain relief on the first generation magsafe plugs was insufficient.

    21. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by rfengr · · Score: 1

      Yeah, considering I was raised in Virginia, I'm offended at Yank too. South gonna rise again!

    22. Re:Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by dywolf · · Score: 2

      sounds like cutting corners with narrower gage wire and possibly thinner insulation jacket as well.
      i don't know the current draw of the devices in question, but if the wire gage is too thin it will get very hot.
      another possibilty is the connection point between the wire and the connectors. it also needs to be of sufficient cross section to tranfer the full current load without overheating.

      either way the answer is: cutting corners.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    23. Re:Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by necro81 · · Score: 1

      It's likely that there's actually more than 2A going through that cable due to power factor and reactive current. The 2 A on the nameplate is the net current that is drawn by the power supply, but if the power factor is not close to 1.0 (low- to medium-quality switching power supplies have power factor around 0.6), then there could be significant reactive current, well beyond 2 A, flowing through the cable.

      USB transfers DC, and so shouldn't have any reactive current.

    24. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot Abos

      No member of the faculty is to maltreat the "Abos" in any way whatsoever—if there's anyone watching.

    25. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by wbr1 · · Score: 1

      Because 'Blackies' is such an endearing sweet term for African Americans. I mean colored folk.. oh whatever. It is how the term is used man.

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    26. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by disposable60 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Pakistan, in at least one of the local languages, translates as Land of the (people called) Paks.
      Afghanistan -> Afghans
      Turkmenistan -> Turkmen
      and so forth.

      Paki is a derogation (and a diminutive, besides). Pak would be the proper term, but because of our Latinate collective-nouning habits, it sounds wrong.

      --
      You're looking for quotes? See my journal.
    27. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by Monoman · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Even if someone dies it doesn't matter as long as it doesn't hurt the bottom line.

      --
      Keep the Classic Slashdot.
    28. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      Different people, different cultures. Maybe it's offensive for some (you) and not for others (australians) ?

      It's offensive, because that's how it's used in some parts of the world.

      would be a much more appropriate conslusion to your post.

    29. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How long are the losers in the south going to keep saying that.

      The south, the original Iraqi Information minister, with as much credibility.

    30. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you are a hopeless loser you tend to get offended easily.

    31. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      Oh, I don't know, how about we ask some Pakistanis how they feel about it instead of Australians?

      Just because someone doesn't think their use of the term is offensive, it doesn't mean that it isn't.

      The people who use the term about other people are the last people you ask if it is an offensive term.

      Like the N-word, if you're not in the group, it's not a term you get to use and say "oh, it's just a word, it's not offensive".

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    32. Re:Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      No surprise there, Apple had a recall because the strain relief on the first generation magsafe plugs was insufficient.

      Oddly, the first generation magsafe plug on my wife's old Macbook (which I've now inherited) is fine after around 4-5 years of use. Conversely the new style one (~2 years old) has already broken due to insufficient strain relief on the computer-end (I chopped open the cable, resoldered it and wrapped the whole thing in amaglam tape... no telling how long it'll last though).

    33. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      I'm offended by this. I'm an American, but I'm not a Yankee, thank you very much.

      OK Reb

    34. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Oh shut the fuck up already.

      LOL ... go fuck yourself, asshole.

      Oh, wait, was that an offensive term? My bad.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    35. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by rfengr · · Score: 1

      I don't know, but it's a....joke.

    36. Re:Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by RobinH · · Score: 1

      I had one of those cheap 12V switching power supplies (came with a 3D printer kit actually) and the power cord that came with it was getting very hot. I looked at the cord itself and it had 10A stamped on the plug end. That should have been more than enough current capacity, so something was definitely wrong with the cord. I took an old PC cord out of my junk box and noted that it also said 10A, then cut the PC end off of it and compared the wire gauge between the two. The faulty one's wire was much, much thinner than the one from my junk drawer. I wired it in and voila, the new cord ran cool as a cucumber. I believe the 10A stamped on the plug only referred to the actual 3-prong plug, and not to the wire itself. In the end this is just bad quality control from some knock-off supplier in China, so it's not surprising. I assume this HP mess is a similar problem. Just a bad batch of wires on the market, either because the original manufacturer screwed up in buying the wire, or maybe something more nefarious.

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    37. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Because, as far as I've ever heard it, it's only ever used as a pejorative term, and definitely not as an endearing shortening of the word.

      Out of curiosity, have you ever heard Pakistan actually mentioned in conversation without it being a negative reference, anyway? The best thing I've ever heard said about the place is that they make cheap knives that will break easily and won't hold an edge. Maybe you've never heard it used any way other than negatively for a reason; maybe every time they were brought up, it was to make a complaint.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    38. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by thegarbz · · Score: 0

      Oh right so now we need to segregate language based on how people react? That's ludicrous and would lead to us not being able to say anything at all.

      I saw a comedian today while at a conference. The conference organisers said at the bar tonight that this is the first comedian they've employed in a long time since previously one person wrote a long winded letter that they were deeply offended by the previous one. I asked the comedian what he thought of it and he turned around around and said that he guarantees a percentage of the room thought he was offensive and that there are other people offended by the fact that some people thought that offensive.

      You can't please everyone.

      Now I live in a country and a culture where we shorten everything. I will call Pakis Pakis, and Kiwis Kiwis. If they want to take offence at it that is entirely their business, and it is entirely their problem as well. If they can't accept language the way it is given (I do not mean to offend by this) then there's really nothing more I can do. An attempt to please everyone is exactly what has resulted in the pussyfooting around political correctness that quite frankly offends me. And I REALLY mean that. I find it offensive that someone thinks I should be restricting what words I can and cannot use.

      Do you work for the Chinese government?

      (see what I did there? Some people will laugh at the connection between your form of censorship and the government. The government themselves, they'll likely be offended).

      Anyway I think you should have a cement pill and harden up.

    39. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      Out of curiosity, have you ever heard Pakistan actually mentioned in conversation without it being a negative reference, anyway?

      Oddly enough, I've known many people from Pakistan over the years.

      They're all nice, normal people, with jobs and families and lives. Not a single one has blown themselves up or anything.

      Out of curiosity, have you ever heard America referenced in conversation without it being a negative reference? The best thing I've heard is they have lots of guns and shoot one another quite often. Maybe I've never heard it used any way other than negatively for a reason; maybe every time they were brought up, it was to make a complaint.

      See what I did there?

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    40. Re:Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

      We get a lot of donated machines where I work and one of the standard desktop power cords actually did burn itself in two. Luckily it didn't cause a fire. Your story about a contractor substituting substandard materials reminds me of a documentary on the building of the Brooklyn Bridge. Turns out one of the contractors was sneaking in substandard steel wires that were woven together for the support cables. I believe that wire is still in there.

    41. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by gstoddart · · Score: 3

      Oh right so now we need to segregate language based on how people react?

      No, you're quite free to continue to be an asshole if it pleases you. I don't give a damn if you do. Just own it if you offend the wrong person.

      I don't believe in the right to not be offended. I also don't believe that someone won't respond to you in a way you might not like.

      The question was: why is it offensive? You'll note I said nothing at all about censorship.

      Do you work for the Chinese government?

      Do you still screw your mother?

      You seem to think yourself quite clever, I'm sorry to disappoint you.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    42. Re:Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by idontgno · · Score: 2

      Is true. Only great motherland can make correct power wires.

      Glory to Arstotzka and its great Patriotic Wire and Cable Harness Factory #4!

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    43. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by quenda · · Score: 1

      How is "Pakis" offensive? It is clearly an abbreviation of "Pakistanis",.

      Its offensive because they are probably actually Indians. Like calling you a Kiwi. Apparently the pommy bastards ( a term of endearment) don't know the difference.

    44. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh we know the difference, we just don't care enough about it to bother with it.

    45. Re:Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice thinking, but wrong. 1.7A at 100V is 170W. That would be a little much for a 90W PSU. It's certainly not wasting 80W, not even under full load. The effects you describe are the reason why the current is listed, so 1.7A really is the maximum current (power on inrush current aside, probably).

    46. Re:Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      How do you fuck something like that up?

      Separate assemblies - the ones who do the power supply generally are very good at it (including the IEC plug the AC power goes into). The output end is typically just a header, and the cables are provided by a third party who specializes in making terminated cables. (Especially modern laptop cables which can have several conductors and indicators), with the only requirement that the power supply end use a mating connector.

      Though, cases and other stuff are also often done by someone else (the power supply manufacturer will often assemble it all together though).

      And customers are stupid and they yank on cords that cause the wires to stretch and break, or bend them tightly. It all frays the insulation.

      Apple has the same problem and often times if you take in a power adapter with a frayed end, they may replace it for reduced cost. Moreso if the machine it goes with is under applecare (and since they're all compatible with each other...)...

    47. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is calling a Chinese a chink offensive? How about calling a Japanese a jap?

    48. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, have you ever heard America referenced in conversation without it being a negative reference?

      Yes. It always amazes me, but it seems to actually be the norm. Of course, that's because I discount all the outright hypocritical standards. For instance, I'm not going to bag on Pakistan for terrorism, because the USA is terrorist in many ways, if not most. We just call it something else because we're the biggest bullies on the playground. So when someone from the UK gets on me for free speech or criminal law, I laugh a lot but I don't count it as credible.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    49. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Life. Damned Life. And statistics.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    50. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Yes. It always amazes me, but it seems to actually be the norm.

      Have you ever spoken with someone outside the US? Or just in the echo chamber of "we're Murica, we're #1"?

      So when someone from the UK gets on me for free speech or criminal law, I laugh a lot but I don't count it as credible.

      That's OK, I'm not from the UK, and I don't you overly credible either.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    51. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Oh, and since I never actually said anything about criminal law or free speech, as usual, I'll treat what you say as gibberish.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    52. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      My point, really. Why do you respond to my post as if you didn't agree?

    53. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by saleenS281 · · Score: 0

      It's only offensive if you let yourself be offended. Grow a pair, mature past grade school, and move on with your life. If you can't handle someone using an abbreviated version of someone's country of origin, I'm not sure how you make it through a day of real life. Getting up in arms just empowers whoever it is that's trying to use the term in a derogatory fashion. And if you've never heard it for anything BUT derogatory statements, you don't get out much, which explains your reaction.

    54. Re:Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by hurfy · · Score: 1

      It wasn't that long ago a tons of standard power cables were discovered to be subpar. Grab your thinnest feeling one and cut it open.

      I think I still have a cable that says "18 GA 15 amp" that contains at best 24 ga wire but looks even smaller. Probably ok on the cheap thing it came with, but they get swapped around a lot and hooking that to your laser printer is not so good.

      I always found the ones with 3 strands like the pic to be the better ones (Dell usually)
      Luckily my HP one has been replaced a friendly Chinese company already...

    55. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Have you ever spoken with someone outside the US?

      Are you really this stupid, or does it just switch on when you hit slashdot?

      I don't you overly credible either.

      Right back you.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    56. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Are you really this stupid, or does it just switch on when you hit slashdot?

      And, once again, Martin demonstrates his learned discourse and debating skills.

      Are you really this much of an asshole, or is it just on Slashdot?

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    57. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      "Pakis..." I suppose you must be from Great Britain, probably one of those "old school tie" types who think those savages should still be all under the Queen's boot.

      Yes i'm from Great Britain, but what I think I that the colonials should be using 220-240V, not 110-120V. Since P=i^2*r and i is proportional to v, resistive power loss in the cable the cable would be cut to 1/4 of what it is today, greatly reducing the risk of excess heat in skinny power cables.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    58. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's the south's version of "Murica! #1!!" For every yokel who uses it in seriousness, there's thousands of people who say it as a joke. I can assure you it's not representative of the general attitude in the south anymore than the people yelling, "Merica, Fuck ya!" represent the entirety of the US population.

    59. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      call them nigga, they seem to like that

    60. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll call you a "seppo" then.

      He he, good luck working that one out!

    61. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      And, once again, Martin demonstrates his learned discourse and debating skills.

      You don't get to insult me and then bitch, piss and moan when I return the favor.

      Are you really this much of an asshole, or is it just on Slashdot?

      I usually only encounter people willing to act like as much of a lame as you have been in this conversation on slashdot, so it's pretty much just here.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    62. Re:Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      I believe much of that cabling was actually replaced when the bridge was last rehabbed (not the current project working on the ramps and roads)

      /they kept the substandard cabling in though because the bridge was built with several different support mechanisms, each one sturdy enough for the bridge on its own, Roebling was being paranoid with his design
      //the cable crosshatching *is* because of the inferior wire however, though in the end they really are a just decorative feature since they aren't needed for support

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    63. Re:Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1

      With the limited info I have I would guess either a cheapskate manufacturer that tried to pass the wrong gauge of cable as the correct one or a crappy connection between a plug and the cable.

      I have one of these cables and after having analysed it, we (the guys on the forum and I :-)) think its more an issue of "dirty" plastics. If they get, e.g. carbon in the plastics used for injection molding the plug, it will conduct a small current, which will lead to heat, which will lead to charring, which will lead to more conduction, and you have a vicious circle going. So just to be clear, it's the "Mickey Mouse" plug that plugs in to the PSU that's faulty, not the PSU as such.

      In my own case, the cable finally conducted enough to trip the RDC on my house, and that's when I started investigating. Having confirmed the problem, I then remembered the time on the airplane across the Atlantic when my socket wouldn't stay on, or the time on the train when the whole side of my car kept switching off... I had inadvertently travelled the world, leaving darkness and despair in my wake...

      Pictures of my measurements (and discussion, in Swedish I'm afraid). At 20mA, the cable developed 4.6W and my measured 80C (176F) is reasonable. I didn't really notice it before, since the powersupply gets quite warm as it is.

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    64. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Oh so now you call me an arsehole just because of the way that I talk despite what I mean and my intentions? What next? All Aussies are arseholes because we shorten words?

      And yes the connotation of deciding to place names on people who talk in a certain way regardless of meaning is just as much a form of prejudice as racism. I suppose you also pick on retards when they say something you don't like because they just don't know any better.

      You sir are one hell of a self absorbed prick.

    65. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      Yes I'm offended by this. I'm an American, but I'm not a Yankee, thank you very much.

      Mets fan?

    66. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by s0nicfreak · · Score: 1

      I don't know about chinks and pakis but only the Japanese-American people I know get offended by "jap." (And even then, it's only some of them. The people I mostly see being supposedly offended, are caucasians.) The Japanese-Japanese people I know consider it little different than "Japanese" (which is an exonym itself) and have a "Well bless his little heart" type attitude about it - he's a foreigner idiot, he doesn't know any better. I know that "Chinese" is also an exonym but "chink" isn't a natural shortening of that, so that one may be different than Jap and Paki.

    67. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by LordDfg · · Score: 1

      Actually it's all about the context, using Paki is fine, Pak is weird, I don't recall anyone using it. If you have to use, try Pakistani. Source: I am actually a Pakistani, living in Pakistan. And yes, we don't blow ourselves up, that's the job of religious extremists.

      --
      Follow me: http://www.twitter.com/dfg
    68. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yankee, to the rest of the world, means someone from the US... and has since long before the US civil war. They don't care if you're from an area that decided they wanted to leave the US for a while well over a century ago, which is why Southerners call Northerners Yankee these days.
      Shoulda stuck with carpetbaggers.

    69. Re:Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      I bought some lamps and other electrical stuff from the big box stores and even from IKEA. The power cords on all these products appear to be manufactured by a plastic that loses its flexibility and dries out, peeling away from the copper conductors underneath.

      The insulation is good for about 2 years before problems start. The problem is not due to flexing, but to some kind of soft disintegration plastic

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    70. Re: Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      we use a HUGE amount of drugs too, don't forget that.

    71. Re:Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      I work at HP, and I'm hoping my power cord I leave plugged in 24/7 starts a fire and burns my building down. Oh, the irony...an HP building burned down do to a faulty HP power cord!

  2. Interesting... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    It's not just HP that uses the LS-15 style, Acer does too for their laptops. Incoming recall for 4-6 years worth of cables coming from Acer tomorrow then?

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
    1. Re:Interesting... by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      What LS-15 style? I thought that was just some internal identifier text for HP.

    2. Re:Interesting... by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      It's not just HP that uses the LS-15 style, Acer does too for their laptops. Incoming recall for 4-6 years worth of cables coming from Acer tomorrow then?

      Don't hold your breath - my experience of Acer is that they don't give a damn about their customers once they've got their money

    3. Re:Interesting... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      It's not anymore of an internal identifier than molex is.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    4. Re:Interesting... by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      What is LS-15 then?

    5. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a model number for a standardized IEC-style power cord made by Linetek.

      I just checked the HP monitors I just bought, and they both have IS-14 cords going to the power brick. IS-14 is the I-Sheng model 14 standard IEC power cord. No recall on those.

      So basically, they sourced a common product from Linetek, but they probably can't name-and-shame Linetek for shitty QC because of contractual reasons.

  3. Another nail in the coffin by toygeek · · Score: 1

    HP = Horrible Product

    1. Re:Another nail in the coffin by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      HP = Harry Potter

    2. Re:Another nail in the coffin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HP = Hairy Pu...

      opps sorry wrong site

    3. Re:Another nail in the coffin by danknight48 · · Score: 2

      - Horse Poo
      - Honestly Pants
      - Hewlett-Pucktard
      Buffer[9] = 'F';

      whooooo!

    4. Re:Another nail in the coffin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obscure self-censorship makes you look like a f%75cktard, fucktard.

    5. Re:Another nail in the coffin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not self censorhip, it has to start with a P to make sense. "Pucktard" instead of "fucktard" is entirely apt. Unless you somehow thing the company is called Hewlett-Fackard?

  4. Who is stupid enough to buy HP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really, people who buy HP are worse than people who pay for porn. They're a shitty, outsourcing, cost-cutting, printer cartridge filling shell of an engineering company. If you think anything they build is good, legacy products excepted, it's because you're too stupid to see what's wrong with it.

    And if you don't know anywhere which can do a better job, cheaper, you're too dull to deserve sufficient resources to allow you to choose a computer.

    1. Re: Who is stupid enough to buy HP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to disagree.

      Sure, their cheap products are exactly as you described, but their higher end products are pretty decent. My HP Envy laptop is wonderful and great value for the price.

      You get what you pay for, but generally that's true for any company, so no need to single out HP.

    2. Re:Who is stupid enough to buy HP? by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Really, people who buy HP are worse than people who pay for porn. They're a shitty, outsourcing, cost-cutting, printer cartridge filling shell of an engineering company. If you think anything they build is good, legacy products excepted, it's because you're too stupid to see what's wrong with it.

      Please tell us what is the good brand then.

    3. Re:Who is stupid enough to buy HP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Really, people who buy HP are worse than people who pay for porn. They're a shitty, outsourcing, cost-cutting, printer cartridge filling shell of an engineering company. If you think anything they build is good, legacy products excepted, it's because you're too stupid to see what's wrong with it.

      Please tell us what is the good brand then.

      X-Art.

    4. Re:Who is stupid enough to buy HP? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      HP's probook line is OK, other than that:
        * Samsung
        * Asus
        * Lenovo

    5. Re:Who is stupid enough to buy HP? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Please tell us what is the good brand then.

      I'm sure we'd all love to know ... but the quality of the HP consumer products has been in decline for years now.

      Their printers used to be absolutely awesome, now I rank them as right around the cheap Kodak printers you buy.

      They're simply not a go-to brand any more.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    6. Re:Who is stupid enough to buy HP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1

    7. Re: Who is stupid enough to buy HP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lenovo and Dell, as the most Linux friendly brands, rank on top of my list. Even for people who don't run linux, I recommend these brands to reward them for ther support of open source software.

    8. Re: Who is stupid enough to buy HP? by EdwardFurlong · · Score: 1

      I have to disagree.

      Sure, their cheap products are exactly as you described, but their higher end products are pretty decent. My HP Envy laptop is wonderful and great value for the price.

      You get what you pay for, but generally that's true for any company, so no need to single out HP.

      I agree, I work with all the major laptop brands, there is much more of a quality range within each brand than there is between brands overall. Each brand has low end crap that is junk. Each has way overpriced expensive laptops that are going for looks over function, or have three folding out touchscreens, which all end up having so many stupid features in the lightest possible setup so they end up breaking.

  5. 20 failures from 6 million power cords? recall! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am actually impressed that 20 failures from 6 million power cords leads to a recall. Seriously, I love the fact that we have building techniques that a failure rate that low is _completely_ unacceptable :)

    Humanity really does kick serious arse sometimes.

  6. exploitation of cheap labor fruits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...poisonous plastics, sub par materials and thus products. i can't blame them really. it's not the workers who really profit from outsourcing all of our production.

  7. Re: 20 failures from 6 million power cords? recall by jones_supa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do still not forget that 20 is the amount who happened to run into problems and bothered to file a proper complaint. It is a hint that there might be actually thousands of faulty cables.

  8. Same folks who made my LED flashlight? by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    A little 8-white-LED key chain flashlight, it's cheap and what a miracle it is. Anyone old enough to remember strapping on 2 lb lantern batteries for a couple of hours' light knows. Really bright, runs cool with and extremely low current draw. All Glory to the Human Race. And Hypnotoad.

    1. flickered on the first day when I tapped it against something. Probably shelf life corrosion patina, took out batteries, cleaned them, ok.

    2. flickering again. spring on screw end not made of spring steel, weak. stretched out spring.

    3. flickering again. top contact in flashlight tube is flat bent strip of copper or brass, no spring behind it. installed tiny ball of foil on top of battery.

    4. flickering again. top contact now recessed into soft plastic and contact is unreliable even with foil or spring shim. flashlight goes into drawer.

    5. need for tiny always-on light. take hacksaw to cut off aluminum battery tube, to reach and solder wire from 1.5V adapter to top contact. drill small hole to attach screw for wire (cannot solder, too much heat dissipation). Works today. Light always on.

    6. flickering again. this time it is failing spring on push button. place small clamp around button squeezing it down tight.

    7. flickering again. this time it is two of the eight individual LEDs around the circle going out when tapped. clearly the fabrication method involved little or no solder.

    8. at this point 'fixing' this little light would involve rendering it down to part level and rebuilding it. Had enough. I decide to leave the light as it is and change my life instead. I have joined an Amish community.

    8. flickering again. this time it is a light murmuring breeze on leaves in a glade of dappled sunlight. tie off branches and sew leaves together with thread.

    9. flickering again. this time it is my campfire. A rhinoceros appears and stamps the fire out.

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
    1. Re:Same folks who made my LED flashlight? by MadKeithV · · Score: 2

      9. flickering again. this time it is my campfire. A rhinoceros appears and stamps the fire out.

      10. It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.

    2. Re:Same folks who made my LED flashlight? by sensei+moreh · · Score: 1

      10a. Further investigation will reveal more about their nature Those were the days.

      --
      Geology - it's not rocket science; it's rock science
  9. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  10. Re: 20 failures from 6 million power cords? recall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm more inclined to think it's financial math. You can over-engineer a cable to last a thousand years, or make it cheaply enough that the failure rate is 'acceptable'.

  11. Not the PSUs? The actual cables? by Cyberdyne · · Score: 2

    How do you fuck something like that up?

    All too easily it seems; my first MacBook Pro power lead caught fire a few years ago as well. This was the low-voltage (hence high current) end, though: in their quest to make everything thin and light, the cable was thin and flimsy, so one of the braided conductors frayed after a while. More current going down a thinner wire meant more heat - which softened the remaining copper and made the problem worse, until arcing started and I got a micro-firework display on my desk. (One of is successors managed to melt the plastic in the plug, that didn't make me happy either!)

    On the mains end, even a hefty (for laptops) 300-odd watt PSU is only 3A from a US outlet, half that on the higher voltages elsewhere - usually easy enough to deal with, but one sloppy connection and you can get a tiny point getting very hot indeed. It's worse on the low voltage end: a single cable possibly carrying 20 or more amps, while getting rolled up, folded and stood on in transit, designed to be very light weight - yet also done on a budget. As soon as you start trying to shave weight and cost, I suspect it's all too easy for a wire to be just slightly too thin for the current, or a connection to be a little bit too weak for long term mobile use.

    If you were building a high school or college electronics project and said you planned to run laptop currents and voltages through such thin wires and tiny connectors, you'd probably be told off or marked down - but commercially, thin, light and cheap trump safety margins and robustness.

  12. Re: 20 failures from 6 million power cords? recall by kiza · · Score: 1

    No more details are known. Just that some cables catched fire. Maybe they examined one of the returned ones and found out that they were not manufactured to spec or maybe the contractor reduced safety margins to a point where they become potentially dangerous. I don't think any company wants to be responsible in case someone dies.

    Better to collect all the cables before more bad publicity gets generated.

    Plus (other comment) most just throw away a cable if it smells funny so actualy numbers are sort of a gray area.

  13. What's up with HP URLs? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    I've been noticing this for several years now ... what the hell is up with URLs at HP?

    It's like they've designed their website so nobody could ever actually find anything.

    I mean "http://h30434.www3.hp.com/" is one of the most strangely formed URLs I've seen, what is it, the virtual host or something?

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:What's up with HP URLs? by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      That's a good point actually. :D Their URLs are indeed quite wonky.

    2. Re:What's up with HP URLs? by Nikademus · · Score: 1

      I would say, there are probably loadbalancers/web redirectors, which redirect you with to one server which you will contact during that whole session. So your session will be kept on the same server and they don't need to use anycast or sync. Just a guess though...

      --
      I gave up with the idea of an useful sig...
    3. Re:What's up with HP URLs? by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      I've been noticing this for several years now ... what the hell is up with URLs at HP?

      It's like they've designed their website so nobody could ever actually find anything.

      I mean "http://h30434.www3.hp.com/" is one of the most strangely formed URLs I've seen, what is it, the virtual host or something?

      I was under the impression that most commercial websites were intentionally designed so no one could actually find anything... At least, that's the only explanation I can find...

    4. Re:What's up with HP URLs? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      HP URLs appear to be by-department. Whether this actually represents the structure of HP's web servers or is only a logical arrangement is another question

      I use the word "logical" loosely here

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:What's up with HP URLs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      outsourced

      h30434.www3.hp.com IN CNAME psg.lithium.com

      turn in your geek card and gtfo if you couldn't figure that out by yourself.

  14. animation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Cheesy offering like Architectural 3D Flythrough, 3D Flythrough, 3D Bird View, 3D Arial View, 3D Flythrough Service.

    Visit Us : http://www.thecheesyanimation.com/3D-Flythrough.html

  15. Re: 20 failures from 6 million power cords? recall by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    It is a hint that there might be actually thousands of faulty cables.

    No, its not, unless you have more info about how representative those 20 are.

    Generally the ones who have problems are the "vocal minority": that is, if you have problems, you are more likely to speak up, so if you're only seeing 20 / 13million, it could well indicate that the problem is quite limited.

  16. I thought this was a feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had an HP 17" laptop about 10 years ago. If the unit was plugged into the wall, and I wasn't wearing shoes and the thing was on my lap, my feet would tingle, and not in a good way.

    This was unlikely a grounding problem with the mains wiring, as I experienced this at more than one house in different neighborhoods.

    I called HP and asked about it. They offered to replace the power supply at the generous price of $149.99 plus shipping. I asked about a guarantee that the replacement would be shock-free and they said they couldn't make any promises, that defects would be warrantied, but what I described was not a defect since the PS did in fact supply power. I declined the offer. Several months later (on the way to an out-of-town job interview no less) the PS died completely and I replaced it with an appropriately-rated off-brand (Belkin?) PS from a big-box store. That replacement didn't shock me, but it buzzed very very loudly.

    I suspect that there was something wrong with the internal power system that was causing too much power to be drawn from the PS. Both the laptop and the external brick were always hot enough to cause pain when held for more than a few seconds. Denim pants were required to use the laptop on my actual lap.

    When buying my next laptop, I looked for something with a different feature set.

  17. Re: 20 failures from 6 million power cords? recall by dywolf · · Score: 1

    the actual number could be much higher, but go undetected because the user isn't drawing enough current to expose the flaw. or maybe the user just says "damn, what a cruddy power cord" and just grabs another out of his collection.

    --
    The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  18. Re: 20 failures from 6 million power cords? recall by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    How many users of those power cables have right now them unknowingly slightly warming up somewhere under their desk? How many users just say "darn cable, did I break it already" and just chucked in a new one? How many users have a problem coming up in following months?

  19. This is a marketing opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They can claim they are selling Firewire.

  20. Re: 20 failures from 6 million power cords? recall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give the cables were shipped between 2010 and 2012 it would be a damn good coincidence if people are going to have an issue coming up in the following months.

  21. What's a PFcktard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hewlett-Pucktard
    Buffer[9] = 'F';

    whooooo!

    So, were you going for Hewlett-PFcktard, or is your array index off by one? Or, do you use one of "those" languages where arrays are indexed starting at 1?

    1. Re:What's a PFcktard? by danknight48 · · Score: 1

      So, were you going for Hewlett-PFcktard, or is your array index off by one? Or, do you use one of "those" languages where arrays are indexed starting at 1?

      No, its a c++ char array.
      Starts with 0. When using 'Hewlett-Pucktard' as the buffers value, the 9th value is P.

      Replace with F.
      Buffer[9] = 'F';

      http://www.byteauthority.com/c...

    2. Re:What's a PFcktard? by danknight48 · · Score: 1

      Yep, its Buffer[8].

      That will teach me to use slashdot before i've had my morning coffee lol

  22. Compaq? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Snorted when i saw this post, couple months ago my sisters Compaq laptop power brick randomly caught fire and melted (It was unplugged and very lightly used), Did a quick Google search and found HP owns Compaq, Think this covers that?

  23. Re: 20 failures from 6 million power cords? recall by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

    Again: Without more information, all of this is wild speculation.

    The world needs more facts, not more guessing.

  24. As I read this I'm typing on a 2011 HP laptop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I actually am. I wish I could see if my power cord had an LS-15 mark on it, but it's kinda melted. Oh well. I'm sure it's fine...

  25. HPSupport transferred me to a car dealership in NY by coastal984 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I really wish I was making this up - I called asking about bulk replacement for my organization, and the email address they gave me was not working. So tier 1 said they would "transfer me to the team in charge of the recall." Well, I was connected with Scott, the service manager of a Chevrolet Dealership in upstate New York. Besides a good laugh, he obviously wasn't able to help me very much. *sigh*

  26. So if I did the math correctly by mythix · · Score: 1

    These are 6 million ways to die?

  27. shipping by vipw · · Score: 1

    From cpsc.gov:

    Customers should immediately stop using and unplug the recalled power cords and contact Hewlett-Packard to order a free replacement. Consumers can continue to use the computer on battery power.

    I must say that I am very impressed by the fast shipping!

  28. orly? by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    HP products melt and catch fire ALL THE TIME. How is this news? At my repair shop we have an average of 1 HP every 6 months light on fire.

    1. Re:orly? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Remind me NOT to send anything to you for repair.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  29. 29 cords out of 6 million by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Seems a tad hysterical.

  30. not all bad... by Chirs · · Score: 1

    They make some decent stainless steel woodworking rasps and other woodworking tools that require some hand-work.

  31. down the tubes by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    Can't even make a fucking power cord right anymore.

  32. Re: 20 failures from 6 million power cords? recall by Nethead · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't call it wild speculation. I'd call that a likely scenario.

    --
    -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  33. Better that than your entire house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Up to 40,000 homes built in Australia after 2000 may have a similar problem with their wiring.

    http://www.accc.gov.au/update/infinity-cables-frequently-asked-questions

  34. Re: 20 failures from 6 million power cords? recall by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1

    Generally the ones who have problems are the "vocal minority": that is, if you have problems, you are more likely to speak up, so if you're only seeing 20 / 13million, it could well indicate that the problem is quite limited.

    Sure, I'm one of those. I raised hell, on a Swedish electrical/electronics forum... Didn't even bother to call HP. I assumed it was a one off, and what are they going to do anyway? Tell me to send the cable to them? (That's too much of a hassle) and give me a new one? (I could just grab a new one from one of the conveniently situated piles at work).

    In fact, the usual rule, born out by science, when it comes to customer satisfaction here in Sweden (originally talking about large enterprises like TV/Radio) is that for every complaint you have 4000 people who are dissatisfied but don't bother to make contact.

    Now, of course, a recall could still be warranted even if there were only 20 out of 6 million, since there shouldn't be any at all. Compare the Challenger disaster. That the O-rings had only been eroded through a third of the way, didn't really mean that they had a safety factor of three, since they weren't supposed to erode at all! Likewise, these cables weren't supposed to melt either, and by a substantial safety margin at that. If as many as 20 do, that means that there is a systematic error somewhere.

    --
    Stefan Axelsson