Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Found the Origin of the Ebola Outbreak

Taco Cowboy sends this report from Vox: One of the big mysteries in the Ebola outbreak in West Africa is where the virus came from in the first place — and whether it's changed in any significant ways. ... In a new paper in Science (abstract), researchers reveal that they have sequenced the genomes of Ebola from 78 patients in Sierra Leone who contracted the disease in May and June. Those sequences revealed some 300 mutations specific to this outbreak. Among their findings, the researchers discovered that the current viral strains come from a related strain that left Central Africa within the past ten years. ... Using genetic sequences from current and previous outbreaks, the researchers mapped out a family tree that puts a common ancestor of the recent West African outbreak some place in Central Africa roughly around 2004. This contradicts an earlier hypothesis that the virus had been hanging around West Africa for much longer than that. Researchers are also planning to study the mutations to see if any of them are affecting Ebola's recent behavior. For example, this outbreak has had a higher transmission rate and lower death rate than others, and researchers are curious if any of these mutations are related to that. ... The scientific paper on Ebola is also a sad reminder of the toll that the virus has taken on those working on the front lines. Five of the authors died of Ebola before it was published.

12 of 86 comments (clear)

  1. Re:death rate could be higher in the end by sribe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Trying to figure out the mortality rate for a virus that's still making it's rounds seems premature.

    Especially when the reaction of many who are exposed is to run, and hide from medical treatment...

  2. Re:death rate could be higher in the end by Roceh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It could be the mortality rate for Ebola has been overestimated in any case, mild cases may not be recorded at all - there is something of a stigma with Ebola. The most recent case with the Nigerian diplomat who skipped quarantine and holed up in a hotel and then recovered after a few days indicates there are some who get mild symptoms (and are still infectious however - see Port Harcourt outbreak).

  3. Take a look at this chart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    There's a chart accompanying the original FA which may help you

    http://cdn3.vox-cdn.com/thumbo...

  4. Dangerous virus by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The fact that so many experts on the disease die of it is a testament to its extreme contagiousness, and why we really should be scared of this thing. Of all people, experts of the disease take precautions to avoid catching it themselves, when they do, its not a good sign. It only makes sense to put into place travel bans from infected countries. It is important when dealing with this diseases to stop the spread by banning travel from the hot zone. There also needs to be public funding for a vaccine.

    1. Re:Dangerous virus by Nemyst · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ebola is actually not that contagious. Its usually high mortality rate makes it slow to propagate, since it tends to kill the host before they can spread it much. You also need extended contact with infected people to be susceptible to transmission (hence why the researchers were amongst the most likely to get it, protection or not, and the lack of treatment or prevention mechanism meant that there was little to do for them once they had it).

      An Ebola outbreak in Europe or North America would do little damage as it would be contained swiftly. Unless ZMapp is mass produced before then, the infected would probably be quarantined and left there, but either way you could control it and even in a major population center the damage would be relatively low. An influenza epidemic like the Spanish flu would be far more devastating, despite the fact flu is a much more common (and less "scary") disease.

    2. Re:Dangerous virus by ultranova · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Of all people, experts of the disease take precautions to avoid catching it themselves, when they do, its not a good sign.

      Maybe. Then again, where I work it's the new guys who follow safety guidelines religiously, while those who have been there for a while can't be bothered because, after all, nothing's happened this far so it must be safe.

      Experts are humans, and humans are notoriously bad at keeping their guard up with familiar things.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    3. Re:Dangerous virus by denzacar · · Score: 3, Informative

      despite the fact flu is a much more common (and less "scary") disease.

      Flu is killing 200.000 to 500.000 people globally every year.

      http://www.who.int/mediacentre...

      Influenza occurs globally with an annual attack rate estimated at 5% - 10% in adults and 20% - 30% in children.
      Illnesses can result in hospitalization and death mainly among high-risk groups (the very young, elderly or chronically ill).
      Worldwide, these annual epidemics are estimated to result in about 3 to 5 million cases of severe illness, and about 250 000 to 500 000 deaths.

      It's just not that sexy to make a movie about it with Morgan Freeman, Dustin Hoffman and a monkey.
      Plus people ignorant of distinction between common cold and influenza don't perceive it as a threat.
      Which is a further reason why there is no movie with a monkey about it.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    4. Re:Dangerous virus by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 3, Insightful

      despite the fact flu is a much more common (and less "scary") disease.

      Flu is killing 200.000 to 500.000 people globally every year.

      http://www.who.int/mediacentre...

      Dying the flu generally requires complicating conditions. Most people survive it just fine. Ebola is scary because most people don't survive it.

    5. Re: Dangerous virus by rhodium_mir · · Score: 5, Informative

      Penicillin is not an effective treatment for Influenza.

      --
      You can't spell "oneiromancy" without "roman".
    6. Re: Dangerous virus by HuguesT · · Score: 4, Informative

      It could be for complications. Influenza causes inflammation, which itself creates a happy medium for bacteria in the lungs. It is standard practice to give antibiotics in severe cases of influenza. This does not help against the virus but helps lowering the risk of reinfections. See there.

  5. Re:Origin? by pjt33 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Or get bitten by. The hypothesised reservoir is fruit bats, but other primates can be infected by filoviruses, and pigs have also been found to carry them asymptomatically. Source: the WHO fact sheet on Ebola virus disease.

  6. Re:You're assuming.... by symbolset · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Some medical workers are in fact spreading the disease.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.