Slashdot Mirror


Anand Lal Shimpi Retires From AnandTech

An anonymous reader writes: If you've built a PC in the past 17.5 years, chances are you read some hardware reviews on AnandTech at some point. The site's creator, Anand Lal Shimpi, has announced that he is retiring from the tech writing business. He said, "AnandTech started as a site that primarily reviewed motherboards, then we added CPUs, video cards, cases, notebooks, Macs, smartphones, tablets and anything else that mattered. The site today is just as strong in coverage of new mobile devices as it is in our traditional PC component coverage ... To the millions of readers who have visited and supported me and the site over the past 17+ years, I owe you my deepest gratitude. You all enabled me to spend over half of my life learning more than I ever could have in any other position. The education I've received doing this job and the ability to serve you all with it is the most amazing gift anyone could ever ask for. You enabled me to get the education of a lifetime and I will never be able to repay you for that. Thank you."

25 of 152 comments (clear)

  1. Many a purchase was based on his quality reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anands In-depth quality reviews will be missed!

  2. Impressive by The+Raven · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Anand's consistent dedication to accurate and objective review metrics, as well as his crusade to put an SSD in every home computer, are both laudable. I hope the site will maintain the same lofty ideals without him at the helm.

    --
    "I will trust Google to 'do no evil' until the founders no longer run it." Hello Alphabet.
    1. Re:Impressive by Barny · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My PC is a gaming PC, OS and applications is about 1.1 TB of storage on it.

      Also, here, $50 will not get you an SSD. For around $100 I can get a 80GB one, but anything over 100GB quickly rise to hundreds of dollars+.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    2. Re:Impressive by wolrahnaes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because SSDs are literally the best thing you can do for your computer's performance in desktop applications. Most of the time you're nowhere close to CPU limits and these days standard RAM levels are finally high enough that only the cheapest shitboxes hit swap in normal browsing/chatting/office type tasks. Everything is waiting on the slow old hard drive. Make that an order of magnitude faster and it shouldn't be a surprise that you can rejuvenate even an old computer.

      My work laptop is a Dell Vostro from 2010 with a sub-2GHz Core 2 Duo processor. It runs circles around most of my customers' computers in day-to-day stuff even when they have Core i-series processors solely because it has enough RAM (8GB) and more importantly a SSD. It's not even a great SSD, just a cheap Kingston, but it makes a huge difference.

      The correct answer for any new computer is a reasonable sized SSD for the OS and applications combined with a regular hard disk for larger stuff like media collections where random access time isn't as important. Only gamers really need to compromise, with so many games these days exceeding 10GB it's still too expensive for a lot of us to have our entire game collections on SSD, but in that case it's still not hard to just install whatever you play most to the SSD and put older/less commonly played titles on the HD.

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    3. Re:Impressive by Creepy · · Score: 2

      Except these drives use the SSD as cache, or at least mine does. In other words, you don't actually install anything on the 8GB, the drive decides what should be there by demand. In my experience, it does speed up most disk operations,but compared to a dedicated solid state drive it is still much slower. Personally, I can live with the slower speed with 2TB solid state drives (non-hybrid) ranging from $2000-7000 right now, at least for any with a reputable brand name. I've seen 1TB drives for about $500 as well, but my entire build was about $760 and even the 1TB drive would have pushed my build well over $1100.

  3. Really hope the spirit lives on by gman003 · · Score: 5, Informative

    AnandTech is pretty much the only tech site I trust implicitly anymore. They don't do bullshit stories, they don't rush things out just because everyone else is, and they aren't afraid to criticize their own sponsor's products. More to the point, they know their stuff, and they have brought a lot more science to testing. They don't even test cases with actual computers in them anymore, they use strictly-controlled thermal loads and lab-grade probes because it wasn't repeatable enough. Hopefully Anand's spirit of accurate, thorough reporting will live on at Anandtech for years to come, because if they fail I don't know of anyone that could replace them.

    1. Re:Really hope the spirit lives on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      toms hardware was never the same after he invented myspace

    2. Re:Really hope the spirit lives on by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

      From AnandTech, 2001:
      AMD's Athlon XP: Great performance, poor marketing

      Totally shilling, right? Heres the sad truth: Since the Core 2 Duo hit in ~2006, AMD has been getting its rear handed to it. It had a small advantage in memory benchmarks for several years after that due to its integrated memory controller, but after Intel jumped on board with those, the only reasons youd buy AMD these days are core count or cost (you get a lot more CPU features at the low end with AMD).

      Performance-wise, and often even on a budget, Intel is simply better. You dont have to like it (and I dont, because Intel's customer service sucks while AMDs is great), but its the reality.

  4. Re:Slightly pro-Intel reviews by MildlyTangy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I personally think Anandtech does overtly good reviews of Intel CPUs. I think they never gave AMD a fair shot. Having said that I think it's one of the best resources for computer hardware reviews in addition to tomshardware, overclock.net.

    AMD processors are just simply slower and their fastest can *barely* keep up with an i5 . I know the truth hurts, but there you have it.

  5. Great Site But Hated the OCZ SSD Recommendations by JakFrost · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Read the site since the beginning every time I needed an upgrade for components ever since Tom's Hardware sold out to its sponsors.

    Anand and his writers were great and they changed the way that computer reviews were done online versus in magazine print in PC Magazine or Boot / Maximum PC.

    His recommendation of OCZ products at every revision of the Vertex line of products deserves a black eye on his legacy though since the reports of failures of every Vertex line 1 through 4 were coming out consistently just a few months after release on sites like Newegg, HardOCZ, ExtremeSystems, Amazon, Overclokers, etc. Anand keep awarding Editors Choices to OCZ regardless of the volumes of failures.

    He admonished Intel for their firmware bugs correctly but then white washed OCZ failures but back tracked and started mentioning their failures after it became common knowledge in the hardware circles.

    Still he leaves a legacy for legitimate and notable online journalism that changed online reviews and reporting by legitimizing it and receiving sponsorship from manufacturers.

  6. Re: Slightly pro-Intel reviews by wolrahnaes · · Score: 4, Informative

    Uh......have you not noticed that AT has a full sponsored AMD section? They literally give AMD news special placement. The fact is, and I say this as someone whose only Intel processor is in his laptop, AMD performance sucks.

    They're competitive usually on price to performance, but even the absolute top end 200+ watt 5GHz turbo AMD processor gets matched by mid-range i5s and stomped by i7s.

    --
    I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
  7. Wow by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I guess running tech sites ages you because he looks 50.

    --
    Mostly random stuff.
    1. Re:Wow by edibobb · · Score: 2

      Running a tech site for 17 years ages you.

  8. Remember his personal video reviews? by kolbe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Back in the 90's when places like SharkyExtreme.com, jc-news.com, HardOCP.com and Tomshardware.com were "it", Anand Lai made a name for himself for his more than truthful video reviews. It was a new take on things with this guy Anand, sometimes sitting on a rock outside, chatting about computers.

    I still trust much of the content on his site, but worry it'll go the way of sharkyextreme now. Perhaps legitreviews or some other can fill that void without Anand around.

    Thank you for helping millions of us make good choices over the years Anand, I wish you the best!

    1. Re:Remember his personal video reviews? by kolbe · · Score: 2

      Pfft... Cirrus Logics were horrible! Everyone who was anyone bought Diamond S3 VLB cards. That is, until the Matrox Mystique came out on PCI!

  9. Re:Great Site But Hated the OCZ SSD Recommendation by JakFrost · · Score: 2

    Correction, HardOCP instead of HardOCZ, caught my own error since I was posting about OCZ Vertex product failures.

    Also, I am guessing that Anand's "retirement" is more like "cashing-in" on the site. Good time to make money and run!

    Commodity hardware reviews are dying out since they are getting less relevant to people. My machine is 5-years old and still going strong after 2-SDD upgrades and 3-video card upgrades. No need to replace the whole thing and upgrade anymore since my computer is running idle the vast majority of time.

    SSDs were the last great upgrade for computers ever since the whole CPU and RAM and Video Card wars were decided and settled.

    Next upgrade will most likely be when 4K displays become common place with the next Windows 9 OS that scales things correctly for them and video hardware that can support it well without performance issues. That'll be another 2-years or so and then I'll look at replacing my computer's insides since it looks like ATX cases and 750W power supplies are here to stay and quite enough.

  10. accurate, thorough reporting? by Ecuador · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ok, I guess, as long as it is not an Apple product. If it is, then all that is thrown out of the window and the product is deemed "great" and worth the extra cost. This is most obvious in the smartphone sections. For example you can read the "android user on an iPhone 5S" article, and he lists all those important limitations of iOS that would definitely turn any Android user away, but says they are "temporary" and inexplicably concludes that iOS is not a worse experience. Similarly, supposedly they would test all important smartphone releases, however they review each iphone multiple times (seriously, check it out), then some popular Androids and that's it. They missed things like the N9, which was probably the best phone when it came out (as I had an iPhone, an Android and a N9 at the time), and don't try anything that could appear too price competitive to Apple devices (like Xiaomi). The Mac/Macbook etc reviews are similarly biased, the site seems to be in awe of Apple and everything they make. As an owner of a Mac Pro, a Mac Mini, 3 iPhones (all company provided) and the experience with them and all Apple products in our company, I am not similarly awed (I could write long stories here).
    So, yeah, Anandtech, while it is not as good as it used to be, it is probably still (one of) the best (although for PSUs and an alternative take on GPUs you should look at HardOCP), but be wary of the Apple bias.

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
  11. Repay? DF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If anything I owe him for all the help I've received over the years.

  12. Re:Great Site But Hated the OCZ SSD Recommendation by AbRASiON · · Score: 3, Informative

    Your memory must be shabby.
    He recommended OCZ SSD's when they were SIGNIFICANTLY cheaper than the competition. They were the first non premium priced SSD with intel like performance and no huge latency spikes when writing small files.

    Yeah look a lot of them failed, I got burnt by many of them - but at the time the failure rate issue wasn't widespread. They were the Celeron 300a of SSD's and so he rightfully pushed them.

  13. Re: Slightly pro-Intel reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Try it in Linux, go to phoronix.com and look at the AMD and Intel benchmarks on Linux. Since most Linux apps are not compiled with the sabotaged Intel compiler like windows, the AMD cpu is much more competitive.

  14. Re: Many a purchase was based on his quality revie by iamhassi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Anand is a jerk. He once emailed my boss complaining I was posting too much on his forums. I called his mom. She's a nice woman and had no idea Anand was emailing people's bosses trying to get them fired.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  15. Re: And now visit his new site by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

    The screw is an implementation of the inclined plane.

    No, it's an implementation of HR policies.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  16. And now will be working for Apple by pjludlow · · Score: 3, Informative

    Looks like his next job is confirmed to be at Apple, although what position is undisclosed. http://recode.net/2014/08/31/v...

  17. So long by gargleblast · · Score: 2

    So long, and thanks for all the chips!

  18. Hired by Apple by rhanoudi · · Score: 3, Informative

    Looks like Apple hired him. http://www.macrumors.com/2014/...