Slashdot Mirror


Grand Ayatollah Says High Speed Internet Is "Against Moral Standards"

An anonymous reader writes A Grand Ayatollah in Iran has determined that access to high-speed and 3G Internet is "against Sharia" and "against moral standards." However, Iran's President, Hassan Rouhani, plans to renew licenses and expand the country’s 3G cellular phone network. A radical MP associated with the conservative Resistance Front, warned: “If the minister continues to go ahead with increasing bandwidth and Internet speed, then we will push for his impeachment and removal from the cabinet.” “We will vigorously prevent all attempts by the [communication] minister to expand 3G technology, and if our warnings are not heeded, then the necessary course of action will be taken,” he added.

16 of 542 comments (clear)

  1. If the Grand Ayatollah's against it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...then there's got to be something to it.

    1. Re:If the Grand Ayatollah's against it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Stupid opinions based on violent fairy tale books, at that.

    2. Re:If the Grand Ayatollah's against it.... by Chas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      HERETIC!

      *Chops of "The New Guy's" head*

      Respect my peaceful religion! OR ELSE!

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    3. Re:If the Grand Ayatollah's against it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The pope essentially said the same thing recently when he said that young people spend too much time on the Internet.

      Religious leaders know that the survival of religion is being threatened by knowledge sharing on the internet, so it shouldn't be any surprise that they would speak out against it.

    4. Re:If the Grand Ayatollah's against it.... by pete6677 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The internet is especially threatening to the Religion of Peace, as it exposes them for who they really are.

    5. Re:If the Grand Ayatollah's against it.... by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When has "fact" had anything to do with religious outrage?

    6. Re: If the Grand Ayatollah's against it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Control is the point of religion. In Christianity the first book gives a lessen of do as you're told.

    7. Re:If the Grand Ayatollah's against it.... by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It might be a generalization if it wasn't true. Been paying attention to the world lately, or did you miss the "religion of peace" committing genocide in Iraq.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    8. Re:If the Grand Ayatollah's against it.... by theVarangian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When has "fact" had anything to do with religious outrage?

      Religious outrage, racist outrage, nationalist outrage. They are all equally stupid. I have had a long series of strange discussions with people of all these denominations about the building of a Mosque in my town. The argumentation goes that: "Do you know how many Churches there are in Saudi Arabia? Have you seen what they are doing to Christians in Iraq!?! We must ban mosques immediately to prevent this from happening here before the Moslems rise up and impose Sharia law on all of us!!!". Really? Says I, for one thing our moslems are a small and moderate minority; how are they supposed to impose Sharia law on us (Answer: Uhhhhhhhhmmmmm.... Uhhhh.... I just fear that they just will!). Secondly I find it interesting that you are implying that one can use the stupidity and cruelty of people in other countries to justify doing stupid and cruel things to innocent people in your own country? In that case did you notice what the Serbs did to Moslems in Bosnia? Did you notice what the white patriotic christian knights of the Ku Klux Klan did to African Americans, Latinos and other minorities in the USA? We must ban Christianity immediately!!! Remarkably enough they considered equating all moslems with ISIS and banning Islam to be a reasonable and natural thing to do (even though the local moslem community is just about the most peaceful and law abiding group of people in our country) but they went absolutely apeshit when I applied their own logic to Christianity. It got even funnier when I pointed out that both the Serbs and the Ku Klux Klan are white and perhaps we should ban white people since most of the people involved in this discussion including my self were white. I just find it endlessly fascinating how the minds of these people work. They keep citing the Constitution when it supports their point of view but then they want to ban Moslems from practicing their religion, ban immigration of non-whites or put gay people in jail for offending christian fanatics everywhere by existing the Constitution can apparently be ignored.

    9. Re:If the Grand Ayatollah's against it.... by kamapuaa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Except no...a little Googling shows that first mention of the number is in a widely distributed book from 2nd century Christian author Irenaeus, who affirms that the number is 666, and mentions some texts with the wrong number. The only evidence for 616 is an old papyrus from the 3rd century. It may be the oldest known copy of the book of Revelations, but it wasn't the original copy, the text was written 150 years earlier. Furthermore, papyrus was valuable and was often re-used, so it may not even be the oldest known version of Revelations.

      In order to prove that the original number was 616, one would have to find either the original version of the text, or a large number of texts (from various locales) which wrote 616, or perhaps have a well-regarded and well-preserved early Christian author like Irenaeus or Augustine say that the actual number was 616.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
  2. Anything that wrests away control by Khyber · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You already know they don't like this because it takes away their control over a population.

    Of course they count it against their religion of control and abuse.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:Anything that wrests away control by fermion · · Score: 4, Insightful

      so the same as any religious zealot, like the Christians in the US who are willing to spend any amount of money and support any amount of censorship to insure that a child never sees a picture of a breast.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  3. You have to define your premise... by Karmashock · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First... moral standards are "his" moral standards.

    Second, internet in general connects his people to the world... exposing them to other view points that might distort their indoctrination to his world view.

    So what he is saying is "the people of my country might not believe in my values if exposed to alternative view points."

    Which is rational. They probably won't. His world view is pretty weak on logic, argument, or supporting evidence. Its just do what I say or the sharp knives come out.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  4. Re:I can't believe we're afraid of these assholes by bloodhawk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They aren't the only country wanting to remain in the 8th century, their are still supposedly modern countries that ban teaching or evolution and insist on teaching their kids at school creationism.

  5. Re:I can't believe we're afraid of these assholes by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Which is part of what drives the radicalism of the Islamic clerics. They have a perverse incentive for keeping things as fundamentalist as possible. They look to what happened to the clergy in Europe, who in roughly a 100 year span went from being basically on top of the social hierarchy to near the bottom, and are scared it might happen to them. In their eyes the situation in Europe was brought around both by the clergy actively supporting reform, but perhaps even more importantly the clergy not fighting back against reform hard enough(read cutting the heads off of reformers). In a society where your social status not only dictates the amount of property you have, but also your access to women, it's not surprising that the Islamic clergy are scared shitless of modernization and are doing everything in their power to stop it.

  6. Re:Maybe it would be good if the Ayatollah wins? by meglon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually, you could have said that about Iran.. until someone fucked it all up. But more to the point, 15 of the 19 September 11 hijackers were citizens Saudi Arabia. I'd suggest you pretty much have it ass backwards.

    http://atimes.com/atimes/Middl...

    Iran is the mess it is now (from our perspective) directly because the US fucked them over in 1953. We have a bunch of clueless myopic idiots who's first and only thought is to dump more weapons anywhere there's a problem in the world, without giving second thought to how that's come back to bite our asses time and time again. If we quit listening to these numb-nutted war neo-cons, maybe we wouldn't keep finding ourselves in bad situations decades later.... although with the whole Iraq/Afghanistan thing, it didn't even take decades.

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's