Slashdot Mirror


Hackers Break Into HealthCare.gov

mpicpp is one of many to point out that hackers broke into the HealthCare.gov website in July and uploaded malicious software. "Hackers silently infected a Healthcare.gov computer server this summer. But the malware didn't manage to steal anyone's data, federal officials say. On Thursday, the Health and Human Services Department, which manages the Obamacare website, explained what happened. And officials stressed that personal information was never at risk. "Our review indicates that the server did not contain consumer personal information; data was not transmitted outside the agency, and the website was not specifically targeted," HHS spokesman Kevin Griffis said. But it was a close call, showing just how vulnerable computer systems can be. It all happened because of a series of mistakes. A computer server that routinely tests portions of the website wasn't properly set up. It was never supposed to be connected to the Internet — but someone had accidentally connected it anyway. That left it open to attack, and on July 8, malware slipped past the Obamacare security system, officials said.

150 comments

  1. Yep. by ChipMonk · · Score: 2

    The country's in the very best of hands.

    1. Re:Yep. by DaMattster · · Score: 1

      Or I'm thinking these hackers were blond and Polish! LOL! Caveat - I'm Polish and Jewish.

    2. Re:Yep. by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes I'm sure this has never happened to a private company or multiple major financial institutions, or academic institutions, or security companies or IT companies.

      Oh wait.

    3. Re:Yep. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, I explicitly recall a statement along the lines of "we aren't going to worry about security until after we get it all up and working first" from one the people running the program. I sure wish I had bookmarked it because it is the kind of thing that is too stupid to believe. It would have been plausible if it were someone in the 90s, but not 2010+.

      The wealth of personal information that goes into the system when you sign up for a obamacare is so massive that I am convinced the system has been completely owned, just because the target is soooo valuable. Steal credit cards from Target and Home Depot and you can sell them once, steal all the data in obamacare and you can use those identities to get new credit over and over again because what is the victim going to do -- stop being themselves?

    4. Re:Yep. by Guy+From+V · · Score: 1

      Obamamancer.

    5. Re:Yep. by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      It's like that old saying:

      You'll probably get fired for going Oracle.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    6. Re:Yep. by linuxguy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      > Yep. The country's in the very best of hands.

      Damn straight, this is Obama's fault.

      Some low level govt. employee accidentally connected a computer to the Internet and exposed it to malware. If that isn't the reason to impeach Obama then I don't know what is.

    7. Re:Yep. by PoconoPCDoctor · · Score: 1

      Please tell me your comment is snark.

      --
      "Let us raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair" - George Washington
    8. Re:Yep. by HornWumpus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Confession: I just actually RTFA. Don't ban me.

      Evidence the attack hadn't proceeded? That the 'attack tools' were sitting there, waiting for the command.

      So someone broke in and left a bunch of 'hacker tools' laying around a directory and listening on a port as a service?

      Wouldn't the last step of a successful attack be to clean up all traces, run defrag then perhaps install a fresh copy of BO. Just incase someone changes the password before you come back.

      How would you know the difference between a successful raid and an aborted one? Could you give a quick answer? If you needed to search logs to even start answering but the PHB was breathing down your neck what would you say? What other servers would you even start on? What OSs are they using? What skeletons have they already hidden? Database? Read only? Did anybody 'SELECT * FROM *' lately?

      Just how good can the logging/intrusion detection be? They let a local login loose.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    9. Re:Yep. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The country's in the very best of hands.

      This is the very first time a computer has ever been hacked! What the hell is going on! I mean, I thought coomputers were completely safe and secure, and no look. It only figures our goddamned Government would be where this would start.

      The only cure is the invisible hand of the free market.

      Never been compromised, and never will be. For the free marketeers strengths are as the strength of ten men each, because their hearts are pure, above reproach, and never - mind you, NEVER to fail.p> See, I can spout as much fake idological bullshit as you can - even better..

      Now go back to the echo chamber for your daily dose of self affirmation.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    10. Re:Yep. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1, Insightful

      > Yep. The country's in the very best of hands.

      Damn straight, this is Obama's fault.

      Some low level govt. employee accidentally connected a computer to the Internet and exposed it to malware. If that isn't the reason to impeach Obama then I don't know what is.

      Fox News reports that 8 out of 10 Republicans believe this unbelievably incompetent security breach has replaced BENGHAZI! as the worst thing that ever happened in American History.

      The other two are too busy trying to find a loophole in Ted Cruz's ability to run for president. They think it will work out if we declare war on Canada.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    11. Re:Yep. by trout007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The difference is people voluntarily give data to these companies where as you are forced to give information to Healthcare.gov. It would be the same as if the IRS was hacked.

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    12. Re:Yep. by bsdaddict · · Score: 1

      they're not spending MY money.

    13. Re:Yep. by VTBlue · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Federal government isn't spending your money either. Federal government is not revenue constrained.

      "Taxes for revenue is obsolete."

    14. Re:Yep. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some irony behind the feds claiming that no personal data was stolen, but I can almost promise they are using/abusing the data themselves.

    15. Re:Yep. by linuxguy · · Score: 3, Funny

      > Please tell me your comment is snark.

      No sir. I am dead serious! Obama is incompetent. Take for example this business with Putin and ISIS and Taliban. It is getting out of control. Not because these are hard problems, but because Obama is a pussy. He wants to keep thinking about it. As GWB would say, time for thinking is over. Its time to kick some ass. If you have seen the Rambo series of movies, you'd know what I am talking about.

      Man, I hope to God Chuck Norris runs for president and wins. I'd like see the expression on Putin's face when that happens.

    16. Re:Yep. by cold+fjord · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes I'm sure this has never happened to a private company or multiple major financial institutions, or academic institutions, or security companies or IT companies.

      Major financial institutions, academic institutions, security companies, and IT companies don't force us under penalty of law to use their wares and put our personal confidential information at risk. Furthermore, few if any of them have managed to create something of such colossal expense, enormous failure, corruption, and risk we see now.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    17. Re:Yep. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You always have the option to go off the gird. No drivers or business related licenses. No bank accounts, no legal contracts, no email, etc And the benefit is no income taxes.

    18. Re: Yep. by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm with linuxguy on this one - what good are nuclear weapons if you don't show people what they can do from time to time? In the 50s we had bomb shelters and duck and cover drills... now we are soft. Sitting on the sidelines applying gentle pressure isn't the American we love - Obama needs to make Mad Max happen NOW.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    19. Re:Yep. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is people voluntarily give data to these companies where as you are forced to give information to Healthcare.gov.

      That is true for certain limited definitions of "voluntary." Modern life requires interaction with big careless corporations. To avoid them is to slide towards hermitage and exclusion from society. We aren't 100% there yet, but every day it gets closer. You can't rent a car without a credit card, you can't fly without giving over tons of information to the airline, you can't rent an apartment without a credit report, the list is practically without end.

      Your mantra used to be a clarion call for libertarianism, now it is more of an apologia for intrusive corporations.

    20. Re:Yep. by myid · · Score: 3, Informative

      On the other hand, I explicitly recall a statement along the lines of "we aren't going to worry about security until after we get it all up and working first" from one the people running the program. I sure wish I had bookmarked it because it is the kind of thing that is too stupid to believe.

      Maybe you're thinking about this: "Among the issues that concerned the government's own technical experts was that security testing could not be completed because the system was undergoing so many last-minute changes."

    21. Re: Yep. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This exactly.

    22. Re:Yep. by efreet1988 · · Score: 1

      Anythings found ?

    23. Re:Yep. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Modern life requires interaction with big careless corporations.

      Sure, but mostly you don't have to interact with a particular corporation. You need to buy groceries, but if you don't like one grocery store, you can shop at another. It is much harder to do that with governments.

    24. Re:Yep. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a difference without a distinction because they all carry essentially the same level of risk. Perhaps in the best of all possible worlds they would compete on the risk to their customers but because that's not a characteristic that lends itself to being understood before the fact it is unlikely to ever happen, particularly in the world we live in.

    25. Re:Yep. by cyn1c77 · · Score: 0

      The difference is people voluntarily give data to these companies where as you are forced to give information to Healthcare.gov. It would be the same as if the IRS was hacked.

      Well, you aren't forced to! You could just not have healthcare, be financially penalized for not having healthcare, and then die prematurely.

      Plus, like all of the academic, financial, security, and IT institutions, the government is really sorry that your personal identity was compromised, but it was an accident OK? So let's not get too upset... they are doing the best that they can! (The hackers are just doing better!)

      Plus, I am sure that they will give you one whole free year of credit monitoring to make up for it, but you'll have to give your social security number to yet another online entity to take advantage of that deal!

      (Yes, I am being sardonic.)

    26. Re:Yep. by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

      > Please tell me your comment is snark.

      No sir. I am dead serious! Obama is incompetent. Take for example this business with Putin and ISIS and Taliban. It is getting out of control. Not because these are hard problems, but because Obama is a pussy. He wants to keep thinking about it. As GWB would say, time for thinking is over. Its time to kick some ass. If you have seen the Rambo series of movies, you'd know what I am talking about.

      Man, I hope to God Chuck Norris runs for president and wins. I'd like see the expression on Putin's face when that happens.

      Why is the parent modded as funny?

      I mean, the post is funny, but I think he was also serious! It should be "insightful!!!"

      Even if you voted for Obama twice, you have got to admit (by now) that he does do a lot more thinking and talking than taking action.

      Of course, with politicians, less action is often preferable!

    27. Re:Yep. by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      The difference is people voluntarily give data to these companies where as you are forced to give information to Healthcare.gov. It would be the same as if the IRS was hacked.

      Well, you aren't forced to! You could just not have healthcare, be financially penalized for not having healthcare, and then die prematurely.

      Actually, the financial penalty is for not paying a private company for an insurance policy. It doesn't matter if you receive health care or not.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    28. Re:Yep. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But but... biometrics willl fix that... right? Bio... metr....? Anybody?

    29. Re:Yep. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you guys can try the republicans next term? Try the democrats again when the republicans screw you... then go back to the republicans... hmm I already mentioned democrats yea? Well you can go with those guys again after that... rinse and repeat till the end of fucking time which seems to be pretty soon if them ruskis go through with the nuke saber rattling.

    30. Re:Yep. by Kijori · · Score: 1

      The difference is people voluntarily give data to these companies where as you are forced to give information to Healthcare.gov.

      So?

      Consumer choice makes a difference where the consumer could have avoided the problem if they had had a choice. But that's not the case here. How secure the back-office systems of a company are is almost completely opaque to a consumer, so they cannot make an informed choice, and the institutions being hacked are banks, credit checking agencies, health insurance companies, security companies - you can't realistically avoid doing business with them.

    31. Re:Yep. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dont worry, the government says that no personal data was compromised.

      Oh wait!!! This is the same government that said the IRS wasnt targeting conservative groups, Benghazi was because of a youtube video, and we would have cheaper insurance rates under Obamacare.

      Never mind... We should be worried...

    32. Re:Yep. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Well, you aren't forced to! You could just not have healthcare, be financially penalized for not having healthcare, and then die prematurely."

      Hmmm... Refusal to take an action resulting in being penalized. In any other venue, this would be labeled blackmail.

    33. Re:Yep. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With Chuck Norris in the whitehouse, I'd like to see the expression on your face when it starts to dawn on you what the consequences are :)

    34. Re:Yep. by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      "House of cards"

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    35. Re: Yep. by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Obama is so good, Mad Max will just happen on its own. I mean, damn, that's some skill right there!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    36. Re:Yep. by trout007 · · Score: 2

      Most of the things you complain about are due to regulations. An airline would be happy to sell you a ticket for cash. A bank would be happy to open a numbered account. As for rentals of course the owner wants to see evidence you are a trustworthy person.

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    37. Re:Yep. by trout007 · · Score: 1

      And if you don't pay the penalty?

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    38. Re:Yep. by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

      The difference is people voluntarily give data to these companies where as you are forced to give information to Healthcare.gov. It would be the same as if the IRS was hacked.

      Wow, a completely factually incorrect complaint about "Obamacare." Modded up as Insightful as well, how suprising.

      There are absolutely no requirements to use any of the echanges in the ACA. The exchanges are provided as a convenience. You are perfectly free to get your healthcare through your employer if you want. Or, you can call up any private insurer on the planet directly and get insurance from them. The ACA only mandates that the insurance they offer meets some minimum standards.

  2. If you like your private personal data... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you like your private personal data, you can keep your private personal data private.

    I'll believe that just like all the other Obamacare lies.

    1. Re:If you like your private personal data... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oops - another right winger wanders over to /. Guess you prefer the lies of Republicans?

      So Obama didn't lie about Obamacare allowing you to keep your insurance and doctor?

      Or are only "right wingers" allowed to notice that?

      Awww, your hopeychangey lightbringer King Putt is showing himself to be a narcissistic failure. Awwwww.

    2. Re:If you like your private personal data... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Obama didn't lie about Obamacare allowing you to keep your insurance and doctor?

      Politician lies! News at 11.

      Well, maybe as other folks have replied there was just some poor judgement. Either way, get over it. I'm insured thru my employer & every few years I still can't keep my same insurance and/or doctor as some bright spark in HR figures out how to save a few dollars by switching from X to Y. (Of course, every employee probably blows that saving thru lost productivity as they figure out the new insurer.)

      Awww, your hopeychangey lightbringer King Putt is showing himself to be a narcissistic failure. Awwwww.

      1st: Wow, that was snarky. Must be interesting to be you & so much better than everyone else. Thanks for putting up with us!

      2nd: If you consider yourself a republican then I'd suggest that you not throw the word "failure" around, given what we've seen in recent years (not just Bush, but the whole Republican party (/lunacy-machine).

      3rd: FWIW, I am disappointed in Obama's performance ... but I'd rather have slow/hard-fought progress in a decent direction than huge progress in the wrong one. We also have to bear in mind the fanatical opposition that he has faced in almost everything he tries to accomplish. (Actually, I've often though that some of the opposition bordered on treason, but there you go.)

  3. Of course not! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "the malware didn't manage to steal anyone's data, federal officials say."
    Mostly because at the time, no one had yet been able to successfully complete the sign up process.

    1. Re:Of course not! by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Have they yet?

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  4. naked health care by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    4chan is approaching AARP eligibility.

  5. So close by BringsApples · · Score: 0

    Is it just me, or does anyone seem to not really care about this (regarding the seriousness of 'getting hacked' that is)? For some reason, I'd like to see obamacare's 'computer servers' all get waxed. Maybe if that happens they won't have to deliberate further about the legality of requiring citizens to put such data on a 'computer server'.

    --
    Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    1. Re:So close by sumdumass · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why does people who do not like the idea of the government collecting and storing personal data (under threat of law in most cases) that until recently was private and confidential on servers accessible by the internet have to be trolls for the Koch brothers?

      And why would that be bad?

      Here is the problem that maybe you simply do not get. Storing all your information on the internet is not a good thing. We have fought tooth and nail forever trying to get people to understand that and now the government decides it is best practice. So yes, completely make fools of fools might very well be warranted here. Maybe then it would cause people like you to wake up.

    2. Re:So close by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      I don't even know who the Koch Brothers are. I don't watch any form of TV, so I don't care about Fox news either. What I do care about is a government that solves problems with more problems. I know that the medical industry has issues, but it all comes down to cost being so high. So what did the government do? They mandated things that made it more expensive. I know their aim was to have those with higher levels of income to pony up more money for medical insurance, and give tax breaks to those that need help, but it simply hasn't turned out that way. Dems doctors wants they mufukin moneys, yo.

      There's no need to take everything that people say as being left or right. Doing so makes you more of a robot than a person capable of reviewing facts. They have ears, but they do not hear.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
  6. Jesus wept, will people never learn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A computer server that routinely tests portions of the website wasn't properly set up. It was never supposed to be connected to the Internet â" but someone had accidentally connected it anyway.

    How, in this day and age, does this kind of stupid shit keep happening? How are network admins not creating L2 & L3 separations in the network, with internal firewalls and IDS? How are operations engineers not building local firewalls on machines, and locking down through security policies?

    This isn't 1994 any more people. Hand crafted individual artisanal servers, personally wrapped in cotton wool and hand reared by the friendly neckbeard, are not how things should be done at scale in this day and age.

    1. Re:Jesus wept, will people never learn? by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      I'm stealing the 'Hand crafted individual artisanal servers...' line. Where did you steal it from?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:Jesus wept, will people never learn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's me and my Secret DevOps Cabal that came up with that one.

    3. Re:Jesus wept, will people never learn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hand crafted individual artisanal servers, personally wrapped in cotton wool and hand reared by the friendly neckbeard, are not how things should be done at scale in this day and age.

      I agree and I'm amazed when I see it happen over and over and over, but I still do.

      I too am gonna steal "Hand crafted individual artisanal servers".

    4. Re:Jesus wept, will people never learn? by Builder · · Score: 1

      The network admins will have all of that. But they'll be a shared resource covering thousands of ports across hundreds of services. And if you raise a request saying that I need on the internet accessible network, chances are, you'll get it. Because of how we structure our SLAs, performance reviews and outsourcing contracts, more often than not, the job of the network admin (or server admin, or proxy admin, etc.) is to carry out the instructions in the ticket. If an approved ticket requests something, the network admin has to do it if he wants to keep out of the bottom part of the stack rank.

    5. Re:Jesus wept, will people never learn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you overestimate how much companies give a shit about security. What may seem obvious to us is completely irrelevant to a VP of IT who only cares about uptime.

    6. Re:Jesus wept, will people never learn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because the project being bid/awarded goes to favored cronies slavering at the prospect of latching onto unka sam's generous teat, and NOT to the most competent contractors ? ? ?
      just a guess...
      (since it applies approx 90% of the time for most gummint contracts, is probably more likely than not...)

    7. Re:Jesus wept, will people never learn? by mu51c10rd · · Score: 1

      Easy, because one of 3 things:
      1. It is too expensive and no one wants to budget for it.
      2. I.T. is severely understaffed and forced to work in reactive mode, not proactive mode.
      3. They have the security in place, but it is so complex and covering such a large architecture, it is not well-monitored nor maintained for fear of breaking something.
      This being the US federal government, there are probably about 100 different contracted companies for all the various parts of and pieces, with no federal IT employees overseeing any of it.

    8. Re:Jesus wept, will people never learn? by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      ... but someone had accidentally connected it anyway.

      How, in this day and age, does this kind of stupid shit keep happening? How are network admins not creating L2 & L3 separations in the network, with internal firewalls and IDS? How are operations engineers not building local firewalls on machines, and locking down through security policies? ...

      They did not hire anyone who could do that sort of thing, obviously.

  7. Whos data again? by bjwest · · Score: 3, Insightful

    FTFA: "Our review indicates that the server did not contain consumer personal information..."

    So we're consumers to government services now?

    It was bad enough when the corporations changed from using customers to consumers, but no way in hell should the government use that term in reference to its citizens.

    --

    --- Keep the choice with the user..
    1. Re:Whos data again? by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      They exceeded 51% net beneficiaries a while ago. Its all bigger and bigger 'bread and circuses' from here on. Amazing government efficiency or hidden costs?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  8. So that brings the successful login count to.... by erp_consultant · · Score: 5, Funny

    exactly one :-D

  9. Better hands than GW Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Nowhere in the comments above you does anyone blame Obama for this. Your pre-emptive overreaction betrays you.

  10. Remember "we don't need security?" by roc97007 · · Score: 2

    > It was never supposed to be connected to the Internet — but someone had accidentally connected it anyway.

    This is where "we don't need security because the machines will never be connected to the internet" falls apart.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  11. Re:Better hands than GW Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's always the current figurehead's fault.

  12. So that brings the successful login count to.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Admins were alerted by suspicious activity on the servers--more specifically by the fact that there WAS activity on the servers.

  13. Re:Better hands than GW Bush by zr · · Score: 3, Informative

    TFA is on CNN, not on Fox.

    Nowhere in the article there's any blame addressed to Obama.

    I think maybe you're seeing things brother..

  14. so by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    healthcare.gov was better protected then sony? homedepot? target?
    Not too bad.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:so by PoconoPCDoctor · · Score: 1

      At last. Someone with a brain and a sense of humor. Thank you.

      --
      "Let us raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair" - George Washington
    2. Re:so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You appear to have a strong emotional investment in obamacare.
      While I think obamacare is a step (just a step) in the right direction, based on your 14+ mini-rants in this thread alone I think your investment has caused you to lose your sense of perspective. Please step away from the keyboard and take a break.

    3. Re:so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's true.

      I at least appreciate the transparency. It was a server that wasn't directly important to the site, and no important data leaked, yet they came forward and said, "Look at what happened." This is opposed to The Home Depot (a shop which I frequent, or maybe formerly frequented, haven't decided) which is a place where I've used my card, and the fact that it went on for months before anyone noticed anything is rather shocking. Is it really this impossible to perform regular audits of systems handling sensitive data? You'd think even shareholders would hop aboard that - after all, it may be more expensive, but the potential loss of customer base would affect their precious value so much more.

    4. Re:so by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Well, at least that is what the government officials are claiming, but these are from the government officials who answer to people who were telling us a few years ago that the VA was the model of ideal healthcare delivery.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    5. Re:so by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      these are from the government officials who answer to people who were telling us a few years ago that the VA was the model of ideal healthcare delivery

      The problem with the VA is that it had to handle a large influx of veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan, and there was no corresponding influx of resources to handle them. I don't know if the VA model was 'ideal' or not, but any system will hit the wall at some point if you keep increasing the load factor and never increase its resources.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    6. Re:so by Straif · · Score: 1

      Only 2 problems with your claims,

      1) The VA has received one of the largest increases in funding of all government departments and it's been a bipartisan effort to increase available funds for a while now. Their 2003 budget was $50 billion; the 2015 budget is $170 billion and that increase was not all at once but continually over those 12 years.

      2) In that same time period patient case loads have only increased about 30% and the majority of those cases are not vets from Iraq and Afghanistan but older vets.

      --
      Of course that's just my opinion...... you could be wrong!
    7. Re:so by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      As someone else pointed out, your answer sounds oh so logical, but suffers from the problem of being false. The VA received a much lager increase in resources than it did patients.
      So, explain to me again why I should believe this Administration official when they claim that no private personal information was stolen during this breach? Bear in mind that this official answers to the same people as the IRS officials who claimed that Lois Lerner's emails had been lost due to a hard drive crash, only to admit that backups existed when a judge insisted they testify under oath about exactly what had happened (the judge making it clear that he would hold the specific people who testified accountable for the accuracy of their statements).

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  15. Re:Better hands than GW Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Has /. Been hacked by right wing crazies? I thought nerds were too smart to believe Fox News. And yet it's always Obama's fault. Yeah, I am sure he personally patched in the server by mistake. #EverythingThatGoesWrongCanBeBlamedOnObama

    That's risible. Nowhere is Fox, Bush, or Obama mentioned.

    Gotta love the hilarity that ensues when the anything that implies just a smidgen of Obama administration ineptitude penetrates an echo chamber like Slashdot.

    A factual account about a specific failure on a government program is labelled "hacked by right-wing crazies" by a "BLAME BOOOOSH!!!" loon.

    AND it's modded up.

    And yeah, Obama's inept.

    Compare his response to Russians shooting down an unarmed airliner to Ronald Reagan's.

    Compare Obama's response to a US citizen getting his head hacked off by an Obama-proclaimed "JV team" of terrorists (that has managed to take over 1/2 of Iraq and Syria - some "JV team"...) to the response from UK Prime Minister David Cameron.

    Look at the situation in Russia - where Obama's minions were so prompt in making fun of Mitt Romney just 18 months ago when Romney said Russia was no friend to the West.

    Look at Libya - where Islamist just took over the abandoned US embassy in Tripoli. Hey, but the bombs Obama dropped there weren't "hostilities".

    Gotta wonder what the poster I'm responding to would say if George W. Bush had ever claimed dropping bombs weren't hostilities...

    And let's not forget about "the dog ate our hard drives, blackberries, and backups" IRS bullshit.

  16. Didn't steal anyones data? by koan · · Score: 1

    LOL does anyone believe this? Do you remember security people warning just exactly how easy it was to infiltrate and get the data? It was even done as proof of concept.
    Believe me someone has gotten in and stolen something.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    1. Re:Didn't steal anyones data? by aaron4801 · · Score: 1

      The only way they can definitively state that no data was stolen is if there is better auditing capability at Healthcare.gov than there seems to be at the NSA (who apparently can't audit what was "stolen"). This seems sad to me on SO MANY levels.

    2. Re:Didn't steal anyones data? by erp_consultant · · Score: 2

      Exactly. The original breach was said to have occurred on July 8th. Despite "daily reviews" by the security team it went undetected until August 25th. That's what....6 weeks? I'm envisioning some sort of Falcon and the Snowman atmosphere with paper shredder margaritas for all.

      Naturally, the administration is playing this whole thing down as "run-of-the-mill, low-level hacker stuff". Uh huh. Then why did it take 6 fucking weeks to find it? "It wasn't even designed to steal patient data", they claim. And what do you suppose were the intentions of the people behind this? Maybe just come in, take a stroll around and then put everything back nice and neat? No harm no foul.

      I smell another cover-up in the making...just watch. All of the system logs and emails are going to disappear a-la the Lois Learner IRS saga. At the end of it all some low level drone will take the fall. Business as usual in the Nation's Capital.

    3. Re:Didn't steal anyones data? by koan · · Score: 1

      Yep and the nude hacker story, the news keeps talking about the "poor celebs" who got violated, the real story is a script kiddie hacked Apples iCloud, that's the story.
      I wonder how much Apple is paying them not to talk about it.

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  17. Re:Better hands than GW Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was replying to by ChipMonk (711367) on Thursday September 04, 2014 @06:25PM (#47830537) Journal
    The country's in the very best of hands. Things don't always line up using /. on an android phone. I did not RTFA.

  18. So that brings the successful login count to.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well at least someones putting the site to good use.

  19. when will we learn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An open secret is the best kept secret.

  20. I'm not from US. Please define by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can someone please define what is consumer personal information?

  21. Re:Better hands than GW Bush by PoconoPCDoctor · · Score: 0

    yeah and your vote doesn't matter - the right wing loves people like you. So sure that there is no difference between Republicrats and Dempublicans. So stay have and play video games. That WILL change the world.

    --
    "Let us raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair" - George Washington
  22. Mod naive by Tailhook · · Score: 1

    Most naive headline evar.

    The news isn't that someone broke in. They've been in since before it went live. The news is that someone noticed.

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    1. Re:Mod naive by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Actually, the NEWS is that it was reported. We all knew this site was messed up functionally as well as insecure as a bare NT box running IIS from 1995.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    2. Re:Mod naive by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Actually, the NEWS is that it was reported. We all knew this site was messed up functionally as well as insecure as a bare NT box running IIS from 1995.

      Wait a sec. What are you implying about my company's servers?

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  23. Re:I'm not from US. Please define by Tailhook · · Score: 2

    We don't know either. It's media speak for some arbitrary subset of data about someone that some administration mouthpiece has fed the stenographe^Hreporters after consulting with some government lawyer somewhere.

    Sorry. Can't help you.

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  24. Re:Better hands than GW Bush by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Has /. Been hacked by right wing crazies? I thought nerds were too smart to believe Fox News. And yet it's always Obama's fault. Yeah, I am sure he personally patched in the server by mistake. #EverythingThatGoesWrongCanBeBlamedOnObama

    These days, all you have to do is post something they can echo chamber about, and they will descend like locusts. >

    Try posting a story about 9 year old girls don't have the right to kill gun range officers with an automatic pistol and see what happens.

    They'll have their caps lock and loaded - ready to rumble.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  25. The wrong side of problem problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I find that when tackling a problem, it's often much more effective to tackle the correct side of it. For example: when a vessel is leaking, putting a plug in the side with LOWER pressure is far less effective than, if it can be done, putting the plug in the side with HIGHER pressure. Prosecuting people who manufacture, transport, distribute, and SELL drugs is infinitely less effective than prosecuting the people who USE them (and yes, I'm getting to my point here, in a second,) and the fact that in the US they do BOTH is the cause of so much utterly needless, useless, pointless suffering, and causes WAY more problems than it WOULD solve, if it did in fact even solve ANYTHING AT ALL, which it doesn't.

    Which brings me to my point. The reason most of this hacking takes place is that the information stolen is VALUABLE. Make it worthless, and the thefts would STOP.

    If I may add to this, DUH!

    So rather than try to come up with ever more and more sophisticated ways of protecting data, (which I'm not against, but again, it's important to attack the CORRECT side of the problem,) is make it worthless and pointless to steal. How? You are the nerds, YOU figure it out!

    Seriously though, what good is stolen data? Well, you could sign up for credit or take out loans, for example, with stolen identifying information.

    THIS could probably be fixed very simply, by increasing the standards of verification you need to present to GET a loan, by for example, requiring anyone extending you any kind of credit to VERIFY you are whom you say you are, physically, in person. It is possible as I understand it to open bank accounts, etc., over the phone or via the internet, and THAT sort of nonsense has to STOP. How to enforce this? Very simple. Tell anyone empowered or authorized to act as a lender, a bank, credit union, credit card issuer, etc. etc. etc. that they are OBLIGATED to be able to prove that whenever they extend someone credit, and if they can't, then the person in question is NOT obligated to pay, and they are prohibited from reporting any kind of negative information to any credit reporting agency of any kind, or pursuing any kind of remedy whatsoever against the individual(s) concerned.

    Similarly, retailers (etc.) should be obliged to check your card when paying via a credit card, against your photographic ID, and your FACE, and write down the number of your ID card ON THEIR COPY OF THE RECEIPT to prove they checked, or the buyer should be able to decline to pay (the credit card company reverses the charge,) without penalty of any kind because they should be regarded as having a duty to ensure the card being paid with isn't stolen, etc.

    These efforts would almost certainly reduce severely, or eliminate the majority of these data breaches, theft of data, etc. Just make it worthless, and people will stop stealing it, and that's the key.

    As a final thought, and case-in-point, if they treated people viewing stolen explicit photos (#recentcelebrityselfiehacks) as the criminals and not the hackers, first, they could actually CATCH people, and in so doing reduce or eliminate demand. Want to know why they want pictures of these famous, and often beautiful people but NOT their trash, for example? Because the photos are WORTH something, while the trash is generally worthless.

    Get it? We need to stop and THINK before we attack a problem, and consider, are we attacking the correct part of the problem, or just spinning our wheels, wasting our time, and very very frequently, making things MUCH WORSE!

    1. Re:The wrong side of problem problem. by bobbied · · Score: 1

      I started reading that rant thinking.. OK, they are nuts for sure... BUT

      I think you are on to something here. Now I don't agree with your examples for drug use, nor do I think we should just go after users, traffickers should be targets of prosecutions too, your ideas on personal ID have merit.

      Actually, this is the kind of thing the credit watching companies do but I like your idea of making it a legal responsibility of the credit issuer to prove they are dealing with the person in question or be unable to legally collect debts incurred. I would suggest that they use some kind of biometric, finger prints, iris scans or something to validate identities before giving credit, but there is something more you need to enforce.

      If you use biometrics, then you have to somehow store them encrypted and somehow only allow them to be decrypted for enforcement of legal terms (such as in court, or to a credit agency when trying to get paid). I'm not sure how you do that without creating yet again another treasure trove of value for people to steal. How you then use them to verify a persons identity without decrypting them is beyond me. Somebody will have to know that John Smith, SSN 555-55-5555 has this unalterable ID, picture, biometric and validate that the John Smith in front of you is the right guy. I don't know how you do that without having the same problem we have now.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  26. Re:So that brings the successful login count to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When a private company screws up or screws you over, you can turn to the government for oversight, protection, and changes.
    When the government screws up or screws you over, you are screwed.

  27. Re:So that brings the successful login count to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I plan to.

  28. Re:Better hands than GW Bush by khallow · · Score: 1

    You certainly sound like you eat drink and poop Fox News.

    Sounds like you watch Fox News therefore I don't have to consider anything you say. QED. Plus, I'll rant like a loon for a while and strengthen my argument!

  29. Re:So that brings the successful login count to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was thinking more along the lines of "finally some competent hands working on the site, perhaps it will become usable soon"

  30. HIPPA compliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good thing all medical information in the US is required by law to be stored in a HIPPA compliant secure way for our protection. ... oh, wait. That doesn't apply to them. Darn.

  31. Great job for the new CTO to fix! by bobbied · · Score: 2

    Give the job of fixing this to the newly minted Federal Government CTO announced on SlashDot just today! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M...

    Oh wait, problem, that's not her job, that falls under the Secretary of Health and Human Services control... Washington DC is broken, very broken...

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  32. Re:Better hands than GW Bush by PoconoPCDoctor · · Score: 1

    No I do not. But all the "statements" made by the commenter could have been lifted from Fox News. Anyone who thinks that starting multiple wars is a loon, in my book. Democrat. Always was one and always will be one. Knocked on doors for then Senator Obama in Iowa in 2007-08. Fought crazy Ron Paul supporters who lied about streets that had been canvassed. I did not listen to them and got supporters to pledge for Senator Obama, Ran for delegate to the 2012 DNC and won - went to Charlotte, NC and worked on both campaigns - 2008 and 2012. Are we clear?

    --
    "Let us raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair" - George Washington
  33. "not transmitted" != "not obtained" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    typical government doublespeak.

  34. Re:So that brings the successful login count to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everybody dies buddy. It's time to come to grips with reality. In all seriousness people get sick and die when they have health insurance too. The hospitals just make sure they take all your money before they let you die.

  35. Re:So that brings the successful login count to... by erp_consultant · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Yes - it's a big failure" - Yes, that much we can certainly agree on. Here is a little news flashback for you (I intentionally did not choose a story from Fox News or similar Right-leaning news source) : http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...

    Not surprisingly, the administration has quitely stopped releasing signup numbers, despite a promise to do so in the article above: http://hotair.com/archives/201...

    The Obama administration continues to play fast and loose with the term "enrollment" and still refuse to tell the public how many people have actually paid for an insurance plan via the Obamacare website.

    I'm not suggesting that people should "die" when they get sick. Far from it. I believe that Americans should get the best medical care available.

    What I am suggesting is that the implementation of the Affordable Care Act has been a collosal bungle, the likes of which the free world has never seen.

  36. Definition of "Lie"? by Tablizer · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Because there is some wiggle-room in the interpretation of the law, it appears he thought, or hoped, it was possible to tweak the enforcement or application of the law enough so that most people could keep similar services or doctors.

    Being overly optimistic is not quite the same as "lying". Bad judgement, yes!

    P.S. Mitt told some whoppers also. Honest politicians are a rare breed; I suspect the system weeds out the honest ones.
       

    1. Re:Definition of "Lie"? by Coolhand2120 · · Score: 1

      Lie of the Year: 'If you like your health care plan, you can keep it'

      I only wonder what we call lies about the lie? Is that like... somehow a lie multiplier?

    2. Re:Definition of "Lie"? by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Meta-lie?

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    3. Re:Definition of "Lie"? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      "Misstatement of the Year" is not as headline grabby.

    4. Re:Definition of "Lie"? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2

      No, he was either lying, or he intentionally did not listen to his advisers who were trying to tell him that people would not be able to keep their insurance or their doctors. Well, it is also possible that he assumed that people had voluntarily chosen doctors and insurance they did not like, so would be perfectly happy to give it up for insurance which covered less and cost more and doctors who delivered poorer service (largely because new regulations would require the doctors to spend more time filling out forms for bureaucrats than actually treating their patients).

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    5. Re:Definition of "Lie"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Being overly optimistic is not quite the same as "lying"."
      No, actually, it pretty much is if you promise A, then can't deliver A. And stop doing the "but but but Romney was overly optimistic too!" dance.
      Face it, you're allowed to admit that Obama lied. You won't die. You won't become an evil Republican. You're even allowed to admit both Romney AND Obama lied.

    6. Re:Definition of "Lie"? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      No, actually, it pretty much is if you promise A, then can't deliver A.

      Failing to reach a goal is NOT a "lie", by most accounts. It's failing to reach a stated and/or promised goal.

      There are different ways to screw up and I am not letting O off the hook in general for screwing that up. But I am bothered by its classification as a "lie" (without having more specific info), being a persnickety nerd about certain things.

  37. Re: So that brings the successful login count to.. by PoconoPCDoctor · · Score: 1

    hotair.com/ Hot Air is the leading "conservative blog"for breaking news and commentary covering the Obama administration - boom. Hot air it is. Nice of you to post this, but suprisingly, I remain unconvinced.

    --
    "Let us raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair" - George Washington
  38. Re:Better hands than GW Bush by khallow · · Score: 1
    Whatever. You're still part of the problem. Even pure propaganda isn't magically false.

    Ran for delegate to the 2012 DNC and won - went to Charlotte, NC and worked on both campaigns - 2008 and 2012. Are we clear?

    Well, we're clear that you have poor judgment.

  39. Re: So that brings the successful login count to.. by PoconoPCDoctor · · Score: 1

    As far as the Huff post, you knows how to pick em, doncha? You do realize that the website is NOT like it was in October 2013, right? But maybe not. Hey, I hope you never get sick and have to pay every penny you have and then some to get well. I would suggest you check out dailykos.com for better information about how the ACA has actually saved lives. Peace.

    --
    "Let us raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair" - George Washington
  40. Re: So that brings the successful login count to.. by erp_consultant · · Score: 2

    I deliberately chose to post from a left wing site (Huffington) and a right wing site (as you noted, Hot Air). Both articles reach the same conclusion. A fact that you seemingly have failed to grasp. Are you disputing the collective conclusions or are you just pissed off that things didn't work out the way you wanted them to?

  41. Hackers broke into HealthCare.gov? by jamesjw · · Score: 2

    In most cases you'd expect hackers to hack in and break the site, in this case they probably felt obligated to fix it knowing that that would annoy far more people than taking it off-line :)

    --
    -- If at first you don't succeed, lie!
  42. Conclusion based on malware found = fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Any conclusion based on malware found is ridiculous. You are basing a conclusion on false pretense and incomplete information.

    A real investigator concludes loss of data or other impact based on actual evidence to show those effects. The presence or non-presence of malware is not evidence of such activity. Its only evidence of that malware.

    Also, malware does not "slip" around. That is a patently false statement, proving the ongoing poor comprehension of what computer security is all about, and an attempt to avoid blame, responsibility, or accountability.

    Sigh.

  43. Re: So that brings the successful login count to. by PoconoPCDoctor · · Score: 1

    Look. Do governments always get things right the first time, or does landmark legislation, like the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and now the ACA, get tweaked over time and move towards single payer unlike the Romneycare the ACA was based upon? It is clear to me that you think a website is all that the ACA is. We can go on, but hey, have a good healthy life. Gotta get up manana and plug in some unprotected servers. Maybe President Obama can give me some tips? B-).

    --
    "Let us raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair" - George Washington
  44. Re:I'm not from US. Please define by sumdumass · · Score: 1

    "consumer personal information"

    Contrary to popular belief, Obamacare doesn't actually provide healthcare, they are an intermediate between a person and an insurance company that provides a level of coverage for health care.

    The fact that many are forced by law to use the PPACA website shouldn't detract from the fact that people are actually consuming the insurance product (although at the end of a gun). So people who purchased insurance or consumed products from the website is what they are talking about.

  45. Subpoena Obama! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course Obama would not show up.

    For Obama it is just too beneath his dignity to sit before a Caucasian.

    Obama is the "Super NegaVerse" in Chief of Noup'n [pronounced in American English as 'New Pin'].

    Ha ha

  46. Thanks NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great job NSA. Maybe you should have been spending your time strengthening security instead of weakening it.

  47. Re: So that brings the successful login count to. by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

    No hard feelings. We just have a different point of view. I hope that the ACA works out in the end. I really do. All governments must seem to have a poor track record when it comes to this sort of thing. Time will tell. Cheers.

  48. A pox on both Ds and Rs by hsthompson69 · · Score: 1

    Because of course, every sick person died before the Democrat party came along, right?

    I'm sorry, but you Democrat partisans can go hang out in the same hell as the Republican partisans - just leave us freedom loving folk *alone*. Stop trying to tell us who we can and can't marry, how many rounds of ammo we can have in one clip, what dirty words aren't allowed on TV, or how much insurance we have to buy.

    Frankly, the best option we have is to never give a party more than one term in office - keep swapping them out, every 4 years (or 6 or 2 for congress critters), and maybe, just maybe, they won't be around long enough to *really* fuck us.

  49. With friends like these... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who needs to get sick? The entire country is going to have to pay every penny it has, and then some, to fix the completely bungled ACA.

    The ACA has cost more lives than it has saved, simply by virtue of the *wasted money* that could've been used to actually care for people.

  50. They only had a billion dollars to spend. by dtmancom · · Score: 1

    Those damned republicans probably denied the funding they needed to also make it secure.

  51. Let me guess: Windows by skaag · · Score: 1

    No doubt it was a Windows machine, and the poor bastard who hooked it up to the internet probably used Internet Exploder 7.

    --

    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain... time... to... die...

  52. not connected? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who do these tool's think they are trying to fool. If that server was setup to test parts of the website, it was connected to the net indirectly from the web servers. The only computer that is not connected to the net, has no connection at all to anything connected to any out facing server.. router web server wifi, anything.

  53. Re: So that brings the successful login count to.. by shocking · · Score: 2

    The signups have been tracked by one guy - current total is some 9m. Check out http://acasignups.net/

    After the startup glitches (your HuffPo link was from last year, and is well out of date) the site seems to be functioning OK.

  54. URI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wikipedia:

    a communication network should allow a user to focus on the data he or she needs, rather than having to reference a specific, physical location where that data is to be retrieved from

    Dear communication network, the address I gave you is not the address of a specific physical location. I gave you something called a Uniform Resource Identifier that is meant to uniformly identify the resource that I want, so that you can retrieve it from the best specific physical location.

    1. Re:URI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh crap, wrong article.

  55. no data was stolen lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These are not the droids you are looking for....................move along.

  56. This was unexpected... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2014/01/16/world-greatest-hacker-calls-healthcaregov-security-shameful/

  57. Joe Biden for 2016 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Joe Biden is a square shooter. Joe Biden for 2016!

  58. because fedGovt is all about affirmative action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as long as your skin is dark and you have a computer degree, fedgovt will hire you. And it don't matter that you went to a "historically black" school where you did not have to show that you learned much. Trust me, I used to work for fed govt.

  59. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the NSA was violating our rights so they could be on top of shit like this.

  60. From someone who *was* in healthcare IT by Killer+Instinct · · Score: 2

    I am not posting this AC cause I dont care, you need to know..,.I just left the healthcare IT industry after 4 years...because security was a sham. It was up to me, the admin, to go on my own and secure everything. I had to do this after hours, on my on time, cause during the core business hours I had to do releases, stand up more servers, baby sit the dev's, fix customer SSO issues, etc. Developers run the web sites..dont believe me..well try to get Ruby devs to change the code ruby auto generates from "Select * from users" to only select the user. Try to make the DB not return a query formed like that. try to break the tables apart so when the code is trying to verify a user who is loggin in, the same row doesnt contain EVERYTHING about them.The devs shit bricks and bitch they cant meet schedule... cause THATS HOW RUBY WANTS IT (or java to some extent). and these are the devs on US soil. the ones in india dont really care, they get paid by the hour, a low amount, so why not argue over shit like this for weeks and miss schedule and drive up the cost(their income) I have worked for two large healthcare websites, that currently hold around 100+ million US users PHI data, and the systems are not as secure as they should be. If they were targeted, they would fold. I know because for some long periods of time i was the ONLY admin at these sites. when i try to lock some things down, ruby or java broke. The customer wants a new feature, by next week, then we did it. Customers like CVS pharmacy, Cigna, Humana. Not to mention the the majority of US companies are going towards a tele-health option for their employees. So when YOU get that letter in the mail saying you now havea tele-health option, guess what, we already have ALL your personal data, from your employer.. whether you choose to sign up or not. Im not saying telehealth is a bad idea, just that in today's society, profit drives everything, security is way down the list of priorities...and as these breaches continue to happen, remember it is not THE ADMINS fault...we can only do so much. yes this is Obamas fault, he is like the CEO. every CEO i have worked for has been more concerned with profit, schedule, capabilities then securing YOUR data.

    --
    #include bier;
    1. Re:From someone who *was* in healthcare IT by Killer+Instinct · · Score: 1

      BTW, one of the sites i worked for was located in the same terremark data center, in culpepper virginia, as healthcare.gov was hosted in. I was able to get it moved to a different host finally. But terremark, i believe, still hosts healthcare.gov...security as tight as a whales ass..bunch of old web applicances tied together with yarn and chicken wire....assume everything you type into healthcare.gov is being sent directly to ISIS and you probably wont be to disappointed when only a few script kiddies and the NSA have your data

      --
      #include bier;
  61. Re:Better hands than GW Bush by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

    No I do not. But all the "statements" made by the commenter could have been lifted from Fox News. ....

    So you don't watch Fox News but know that all the comments could have been lifted from them? I guess you must have seen snipits posted on sites you read and assume that the editorial part of Fox News is the news part - the same editorial parts that CNN and MSNBC have but leaning the other way.

    Democrat. Always was one and always will be one.

    Ah - well I'm glad you admit to have an open mind. Sounds like the Democrats don't really have to do anything to win your vote - which is probably why they don't really care what they do on the privacy or war fronts.

  62. Re: So that brings the successful login count to.. by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

    Umm...it was a joke dude. Obviously more than one person has been able to sign up. Thanks for playing though.

  63. Re: So that brings the successful login count to.. by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

    After the startup glitches (your HuffPo link was from last year, and is well out of date) the site seems to be functioning OK.

    Except for this security breach, right?

  64. What? No Pics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hacking healthcare.gov to get JLaw nude pics? New low!!!

  65. Re: So that brings the successful login count to.. by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

    I would suggest you check out dailykos.com for better information about how the ACA has actually saved lives.

    Do you realize that healthcare actually was working for the vast majority of people? ACA has not really been around long enough to determine if it saved lives. And will you count people that die because their previous insurance was lost because of ACA the fault of ACA or the fault of the private insurance?

    I have a feeling that in your mind, anything good regarding ACA is to the credit of government and anything bad is the fault of the businesses or republicans. That's a nice, sheltered world to live in. (I base this on your comments that you don't even listen to alternative views and will always vote democrat.

  66. What were they surfing for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...someone had accidentally connected it anyway" while they were 'accidentally' downloading porn.

  67. Re:So that brings the successful login count to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Obama administration continues to play fast and loose with the term "enrollment" and still refuse to tell the public how many people have actually paid for an insurance plan via the Obamacare website.

    So, here is where you have to make a choice. Either the Democratic Administration is a totalitarian, communist regime trodding all over the rights of private, capitalist institutions by forcing them to report their number of paid enrollees, or the Democratic Administration is a pussy-footed, truth-hiding bunch of disingenuous shits for not forcing private insurance companies to give them the information that you want.

    Of course there's a third option. You could simply recognize that the number of paid enrollees is a figure that belongs to the insurance companies, and while the government can ask them for that information, they cannot compel them to turn it over. But you can't simply recognize that without putting a Murdoch/Roger Ailes spin on it, can you?

    The parent poster won't read the following link with any interest in the actual verity of the claims. He'll just make some dismissive statement without contradicting any of the claims, because the site doesn't fit within his narrow world view. But for the rest of you, I refer you to actual facts regarding paid/unpaid numbers and how tricky it is coming up with a solid figure:

    http://acasignups.net/14/05/27/ok-republicans-now-you-can-ask-all-insurance-companies-how-many-have-paid

  68. Re:Better hands than GW Bush by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

    There are times in life when you need to admit " I'm just digging this hole further down", and let it go.
    That time for you, in this argument, is now.
    However, I know you won't.

  69. Re: So that brings the successful login count to.. by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

    Please, keep talking, I find your unabashed partisanship amusing.

  70. It makes no difference what government site it was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It makes no difference what government site it was, the key point to look at is this statement: “malware slipped past the Obamacare security system “. If the governments security system is being hacked, then just how safe is any government site?