Slashdot Mirror
China's Island Factory
An anonymous reader writes: The BBC has a lengthy investigative report about China's efforts to create and expand artificial islands in the South China Sea. They've been going to coral reefs and atolls, dredging the bottom for material, and dumping it on top of the reef to create new land. On at least one of the new islands, China will build an air base large enough for fighter jets to use. This highlights one of China's main reasons for constructing these islands: sovereignty and strategic control of the surrounding area. "The U.S. government does not acknowledge China's claim, and the U.S. Pacific fleet continues to sail regularly through the South China Sea. But the Chinese navy is beginning to grow more assertive. In December 2013 China sailed its brand new aircraft carrier, the Liaoning, into the South China Sea for the first time. Shadowing it, at about 30 nautical miles, came the U.S. Navy cruiser USS Cowpens. A Chinese amphibious assault ship approached and ordered it to leave the area. The commander of the Cowpens refused, saying he was sailing in 'international waters.'"
Little late for that.
Even Obama acknowledged this years ago when he stated that the U.S. would shift its attention from the Middle East to Asia.
Is pretty hilarious. All countries pull their fair share of bullshit but come on.. territorial waters that just wander southward like that, cutting between vietnam and the philippines?
Oh well.. I expect a typhoon or two will swamp those attempts at man-man islands.
Which is good, because the US can no longer beat the crap out of anyone. While the US still has the largest military penis in the world, they can't really afford to use it any more because the last few escapades have bankrupted them and they can no longer afford the Viagra they need to make it an effective tool to fuck anyone else. So yea, they can bomb a bunch of ISIS amaterus and call it a war. In reality, it's more like a 5 year old stomping on ants. A real war? With a major power? I think we'd find the US to be hilariously flaccid at an event like that.
Hmmm, the crews of the battleships that bombarded Normandy before and after the landings would be interested to hear that, I suspect. Small, cheap torpedo boats were no match for the destroyers build specifically to 'destroy' them. For every weapon there is a counter weapon, anti-ship cruise and ballistic missiles are a threat to aircraft carriers, but the problem for small ships has always been target identification. For all the technology, it's still a big ocean, and an aircraft carrier is still effective from a long way away. I'd say the jury is still out.
The Chinese love to call hypocrisy, about "Well, the US does blah blah blah..." However, look at the Gulf of Mexico, a good comparative example to the South China Sea situation. See, in the Gulf of Mexico, the United States may actually have a strong position than the Chinese, with greater amount of shoreline touching the water and greater military superiority over its neighbors. There's oil in those water, rich fisheries, and its a critical body of water for American security interests. Yet unlike the Chinese, the Americans didn't scoop up the entire region like a hollowed out grapefruit and tell its neighbors FU. Instead, they sat down, from a position of power no less, and negotiated equitable maritime boundaries, not just with friendly nations like Mexico, but with hostile states like the Cubans. However, the Chinese are different, proving quite greedy and trying to essentially annex other nations' EEZ from Malaysia and Brunei up to Korea and Japan. It's a sad state of affairs, and it only serves to unite China's neighbors against it. With actions like that, they really shouldn't question why their neighbors fear them.