Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Text While Driving In Long Island and Have Your Phone Disabled

Posted by Soulskill on from the how-about-a-self-destruct-feature dept.

An anonymous reader writes: A District Attorney in Long Island, NY is stepping up efforts to combat distracted driving. Kathleen Rice says motorists who are caught texting while driving should have hardware or apps installed on their phone to prevent them from using it at all while driving. She likened such barriers to the ignition interlock devices that prevent people convicted of drunk driving from using their cars unless they're sober. "Hardware and software solutions that block texting during driving are currently produced by various manufacturers and software developers, and are constantly under development. The DA's office does not endorse any particular company and is in the process of reviewing specific solutions based on their features and services. Critical features include security measures to make the solutions tamper-proof, and data integrity measures to ensure accurate reporting to courts, law enforcement, parents, and guardians." New York is one of many states who already have laws banning all handheld use while driving.

9 of 364 comments (clear)

  1. It should be by rossdee · · Score: 5, Informative

    It should be the car that is disabled (or your license taken away)

    1. Re:It should be by SJHillman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You'd have more of a point if the US wasn't so often concerned with the domestic policies of other nations.

    2. Re:It should be by jeffmeden · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Ironically, if you do text and drive, you are likely to become disabled.

      How any automated system will know if the phone is used by driver vs passenger is a challenge, I imagine.

      They are OK with ignition interlocks that could easily be defeated if a non-inebriated passenger were to provide the breath for analysis. The idea is to put a barrier in front of a known offender, not to properly filter the actions of would-be offenders. One would think that this sort of reform/punishment would be offered in lieu of alternatives (i.e. you can get your license back in half the time, if you agree to have your phone locked/monitored) such that you can opt out, if you want to receive the normal punishment.

  2. difference between driver and passenger? by i.r.id10t · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How would a system tell the difference between a driver and passenger in the car?

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    1. Re:difference between driver and passenger? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I suppose the same way PawSense detects whether a cat or a human is using the device: when you text and drive, you have a funny way of using the device - because you're constantly switching between texting, putting down the device and driving, picking it back up after 10 seconds, and doing that over and over, as opposed to a human that's fully committed to the task of inputting text.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  3. The reason by NotDrWho · · Score: 5, Funny

    They don't want anyone texting out to warn people not to come to Long Island.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  4. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But if you a cop you get a free pass.

  5. Re:And if I am ridding in the car? by SJHillman · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't think "treason" means what you think it means. Or "arresting". Or "suggestion". Actually, I'm not sure if you speak English or just pissed on a dictionary and strung together whatever didn't get wet.

  6. Re:Maybe driver vs passenger doesn't matter by overshoot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Text messages aren't reliable enough for any life saving use

    That must be why 911 systems are adding text capability.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."