Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: What To Do After Digitizing VHS Tapes?

An anonymous reader writes Now that I've spent close to a month digitizing a desk drawer's worth of VHS tapes, deinterlacing and postprocessing the originals to minimize years of tape decay, and compressing everything down to H.264, I've found myself with a hard drive full of loosely organized videos. They'll get picked up by my existing monthly backup, but I feel like I haven't gained much in the way of redundancy, as I thought I would. Instead of having tapes slowly degrade, I'm now open to losing entire movies at once, should both of my drives go bad. Does anyone maintain a library, and if so, what would they recommend? Is having them duplicated on two drives (one of which is spun down for all but one day of the month) a good-enough long term strategy? Should I look into additionally backing up to optical discs or flash drives, building out a better (RAIDed) backup machine, or even keeping the original tapes around despite them having been digitized?

31 of 268 comments (clear)

  1. Use the cloud, Luke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Upload them to youtube! The internet never forgets, apparently.

  2. Offsite. by Kaenneth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Keep a copy in a different building to protect against fire/flood/theft/etc.

    1. Re:Offsite. by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Informative

      Definitely this. If you have a buddy or relative willing to have a little NAS box running on their network, you can do something like Crashplan and get offsite backup for "free". I happen to use Crashplan, but rsync would work just fine. Both let you "seed" the initial backup so that you aren't waiting for months to do the initial backup.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:Offsite. by asmkm22 · · Score: 2

      Also make sure that whatever backup scheme you are using, that you somehow verify the data is actually good. You don't want to have to recover from a backup in 10 years, only to find out that "Grandma's 80th Birthday" video is corrupted.

    3. Re:Offsite. by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      I looked into BTSync and - at least as of a few months ago - it really had trouble with mixed computer OS environments. It would probably be fine for simple video files, but it did not handle all the Mac metadata on Windows, Windows metadata on Linux, etc. There are workarounds, but nothing I felt like dealing with.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    4. Re:Offsite. by Archfeld · · Score: 4, Informative

      No backup media in use manufactured by ANY company is guaranteed for more than 12 months. While the media may have a 7 year life span the data on it NEEDS to be renewed at least once every 12 months and failure to do so abrogates nearly every warranty. I worked for a large bank and dealt extensively in federally mandated offsite Contingency Operations and Recovery and learned one thing, backups without recovery exercises are next to useless if you are actually seeking said protections rather than just meeting the bare minimum requirements set forth. If you really value the videos you've gone to such trouble to back-up then periodically you need to verify they still work and view them or you are just performing an exercise in rote time wasting.

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    5. Re:Offsite. by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      You have me wondering if using zfs wouldn't be a good option here. You could put the pair of drives in a single enclosure and make them into a pool. Then every quarter or so bring your drives home, update the data, and do a scrub. Thus you get the parity for "free". If your primary backup is also zfs, you can even do a zfs send and get incremental backups for "free" as well.

      Of course, now the "all you can eat" online backup services are starting to approach the cost of a safety deposit box :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    6. Re:Offsite. by gronofer · · Score: 2

      Good advice, but I think calculating an SHA-1 hash would be more reliable and quicker than viewing them.

  3. Re:Final Cut Pro library by jedidiah · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In other words: throw lots of money at the problem regardless of whether or not the solution is even vaguely appropriate.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  4. Ashes to Ashes ... by powerlord · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... Tape to Tape

    If you're looking purely at longevity of storage and reliability, Tape backup is still the way to go.

    Baring that, spread backup copies around, and make sure to keep redundant copies on several flash drives?

    --
    This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
  5. Back up to optical media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I archive my home movies in three ways:

    1. Keep highest quality copy on my always-spinning hard drive
    2. Keep highest quality copy on someone else's online storage, such as Mega.co.nz, Dropbox, OneDrive, etc.
    3. Make regular copies to DVDs (and starting this year, Blu-rays) and distribute to my family members for their own collection. They in turn do the same with theirs.

    This way if anything were to happen to one copy, there's always other locations to get a copy of it.

    1. Re:Back up to optical media by C0L0PH0N · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I second this approach. Keep a "master archive" of highest quality, both on local hard drives and backed up to the cloud (BackBlaze for example has unlimited backup for $5/mo). Then provide "exhibit" copies at a lower quality to the web and to friends. Backing up the "master archive" is critical! The "derivative" files shared out aren't so critical, as they can be reconstructed from the "master archive". An example is MPEG-2 will preserve videos at high quality, but with large file sizes. Scanning slides to TIF at say 4800 dpi will create 20mb files. These are "master archive" material. But you can prepare a copy of the video as an MPEG-4 or H.264 at much lower quality and much lower file size, that will still look stunning over the web. And you can derive JPGs from the master TIFs that at much lower quality, still look stunning over the Internet, for example. But for posterity, the "master archive" can become a museum collection for your descendants that they will cherish. An interesting thing to ponder is, will the US ever get hit with a few EMP nuclear bursts? If so, they may wipe out all magnetic media everywhere. That is where backups on optical disks, say, Blu-Ray, would be valuable. May be being a little paranoid there? :). For more information on this approach, consult http://archivehistory.jeksite.....

    2. Re:Back up to optical media by BUL2294 · · Score: 2

      Seriously, cloud based backup is not the panacea you want to believe that it is. Think about it... With "unlimited storage for $5/mo", how does a company like BackBlaze have any viability? Right now, if you were to store 10TB of data (which has been thrown around in some of the other posts), their ROI is insanely high. Even if they went cheap and bought SATA 3.5" drives, a 4TB drive (on Pricewatch) will run $118, or $28.3167/TB. Let's say they can buy drives in bulk at $25/TB, 10TB would cost them $250 worth of equipment. At $5/month, their break-even point is at 50+ months--and that's assuming NPV is not important...

      Now, let's throw in Visa/MC charge fees, bandwidth costs, additional hardware for RAID, office overhead, other equipment, legal / NSA requests / DMCA takedowns, etc., and the simple ROI of 50+ months easily balloons to 100+ months--if not out to infinity. There's no way a company like that is viable at current media prices, especially since your data is available on-demand (e.g. no delays for their tape to transfer to HD media)...

      Viability of your backup solution is just as important whether it's longevity of tape & a physical drive you actually buy or the business plan of a cloud-based option.

      --
      Windows 3.1x calc: 3.11 - 3.10 = 0.00
  6. Are They? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    If they are naked vids of you and your GF, the Internet will gladly archive millions of copies.

  7. Re:Wow by Ravaldy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Considering how many users on this forum will learn something from this I would say it's not a complete waste of time.

    I spent countless hours searching the web. Unfortunately there is no straight answer but I do have one after trying many pieces of software. I'll post this in a different post

  8. CrashPlan by Ravaldy · · Score: 2

    I had a similar problem as you and I found what I consider the best solution for home users. There are many options where you can store you data in the cloud for a yearly fee but it does get expensive as you pass the 200GB mark. What I use is Crashplan. Their software allows you to backup to their cloud or to a friends storage. So if you know someone else with the same problem you can have them allocate some space on their machine for you and you do the same for them. The backups are protected so he won't be able to play with your data. This is all at no charge.

    I personally use the Enterprise version which allows you to host your own server. I have my reasons for doing this but most users will be happy with the free home version.

  9. Re:Wow by redmid17 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Literally punching in what I suggested into Google yields this Slashdot discussion as the 2nd result

    http://ask-beta.slashdot.org/s...

    Whodathunkit?

  10. But what about asteroids? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Better to keep a backup on Earth and on Mars, just in case.

    1. Re:But what about asteroids? by imikem · · Score: 2

      That's it! Now we have a way to finance the Mars colonization, by backing up all those 1980s and 1990s cat videos we just migrated off VHS tape. I'll see about standing up the first off-planet data center later this week.

      --
      Perscriptio in manibus tabellariorum est.
  11. Amazon Glacier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Amazon Glacier is for long term storage of lots of data. While they only provide an API, it is easier to code to and 3rd party interfaces exist should you want a GUI.

    It is also dirt cheap. My current bill is less than $1 per month. You'll pay more to access the data should you need to but storage is priced reasonably.

    1. Re:Amazon Glacier by Asgard · · Score: 2

      You can use S3 to interact with glacier; create a 'VHS Archive' bucket with a bucket policy to migrate to Glacier after X days. Upload everything there and let it sit; this sort of use case is *exactly* the sort of thing Glacier was intended for.

  12. Re:Wow by Art+Challenor · · Score: 4, Funny

    Whodathunkit?

    A link to Slashdot Beta the new goatse.cx?

  13. Safe deposit box by wiredog · · Score: 3, Interesting

    External hard drives are cheap. I Have one in the safe deposit box at the bank, one at home, and I rotate them every couple of months. I just do a copy of /Users (on my Mac, /home on Linux, not sure what the WIndows equivalent is) to the hard drive.

    1. Re:Safe deposit box by safetyinnumbers · · Score: 3, Informative

      You should consider creating par2 parity files, which can repair as well as detect corrupt files.

  14. Re:Ask Slashdot by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 4, Funny

    Of course its rejected. Bacon is the only way! (Sausage is for Emacs users).

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  15. nas4free, raidz2, primary/secondary server, rsync by karlandtanya · · Score: 2

    2 servers are set up raidz2 with 4 disks per server. So about 6-7 TiB of actual storage space.
    The servers do dns, mysql, and smb via plugins and a jail.
    the primary backs up to the secondary every evening.

    All the TVs in the house are really xbmc clients connecting to the SMB shares and mysql.

    The most expensive part of it is the 8ea 4T HDDs.
    Unless you have 10 people in your house watching different TVs at the same time, you can use real low end computers.
    disks are $150 ($120 if you get externals on sale from huevonuevo & open the box). Excellent computer for this is a Dell poweredge T20 ($300).
    These T20s have ECC RAM (you want this)
    Anyhow 8*150 + 2*300 + a hundred bucks for misc. cables, bootable memory stick, maybe a switch...
    Under 2 grand for the whole mess. Put one in your basement and one in your attic. Then you are protected from a flood or a tornado--but not both together.
    If your house burns down, though, you're hosed ;).

    Upgrade plan is to "destroy" (that's the command...) the zpool in the secondary then change it from raidz2 with 4 disks to raidz2 with 6 disks.
    let rsync do its thing, then swap the usb keys with the embedded OS.
    Repeat with the old primary which will now be the secondary.
    Already tried this once; works no problem. At any given moment I'm tolerant to at least 2 disk failures.

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  16. Re:Final Cut Pro library by lgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For pro video editing - which is to say lots of content that frequently changes - tape backup still makes sense. There's still no better way to archive large amounts of data, although 2.5 TB (IIRC) tape size for the latest LTO has fallen behind, and the next gen isn't due for likely a year.

    But the one-time cost for tape drives is pretty steep. If you're going to use many tapes each month, it's worth it. Heck, I'd say even at 10 TB of new data a month being archived, there's no better way. But for, say, 10 TB of fixed data that just needs to be archived once, it's overkill.

    Buy a few HDDs, keep their shipping containers, make a backup and ship them to a friend in a different state. Repeat yearly. That's the economical way. Eventually it will all fit on a single drive, after all (aren't there leading edge 10 TB drives already?), and so you're looking at ~$10/month long term (heck, no matter how much fixed data, eventually it will fit on one drive and cost about that much).

     

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  17. Burn to M-Disc by guytoronto · · Score: 3, Informative

    Burn them to M-Disc. As long as there is a DVD player somewhere, no worries. M-Disc doesn't degrade like magnetic media or dye-based optical media.

  18. Yes, Voyager by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Funny

    They're both still vulnerable to supernovae. You should have at least one backup in another galaxy.

    Fun fact, the real reason for the Voyager mission was someone wanted a permanent backup of William Shatner singing "Lucy in the Sky With Diamonds". You didn't ever see the back of that record they included with Voyager, did you... now you know why.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Yes, Voyager by iggymanz · · Score: 2

      You're close, Voyager was so that both copies of that godawful song were flung out of the solar system to the stars.

  19. Re:Final Cut Pro library by RJFerret · · Score: 2

    Nah, sell your homemade porn tapes in a tag sale. No need to digitize and restore them yourself. Someone else will get off doing that, post the results online, and soon they'll be replicated not just "in the cloud", but redundantly all over the world. It won't matter, you'll never know as you'll never desire to watch them anyway. You might earn a couple bucks at the tag sale though. Use it to buy vibrator batteries.