Slashdot Mirror


FBI Completes New Face Recognition System

Advocatus Diaboli writes: According to a report from Gizmodo, "After six years and over one billion dollars in development, the FBI has just announced that its new biometric facial recognition software system is finally complete. Meaning that, starting soon, photos of tens of millions of U.S. citizen's faces will be captured by the national system on a daily basis. The Next Generation Identification (NGI) program will logs all of those faces, and will reference them against its growing database in the event of a crime. It's not just faces, though. Thanks to the shared database dubbed the Interstate Photo System (IPS), everything from tattoos to scars to a person's irises could be enough to secure an ID. What's more, the FBI is estimating that NGI will include as many as 52 million individual faces by next year, collecting identified faces from mug shots and some job applications." Techdirt points out that an assessment of how this system affects privacy was supposed to have preceded the actual rollout. Unfortunately, that assessment is nowhere to be found.

Two recent news items are related. First, at a music festival in Boston last year, face recognition software was tested on festival-goers. Boston police denied involvement, but were seen using the software, and much of the data was carelessly made available online. Second, both Ford and GM are working on bringing face recognition software to cars. It's intended for safety and security — it can act as authentication and to make sure the driver is paying attention to the road.

20 of 129 comments (clear)

  1. Baaah... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Vegas casinos were doing this years ago...

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Baaah... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And now it's there when you Skype with your girlfriend (hah).

      Not a far-fetched idea, what with the close ties between tech titans and the Three Letter Agencies. Indeed, these folks probably would not even need cooperation to "scrape" images from Skype and similar applications.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re:Baaah... by Noah+Haders · · Score: 3, Insightful

      there's a difference when a private company does it and the government does it. the government has the legal ability to shoot and kill citizens on the street, take away their belongings, or jail them for life. we have a constitution in place to limit the role of government. private companies have more leeway but less scope to dictate people's lives.

    3. Re:Baaah... by Andrewkov · · Score: 2

      And all that "tagging" of photos in Facebook, the database is pretty much ready-made for them. Crowd-sourcing backfire?

    4. Re:Baaah... by Noah+Haders · · Score: 4, Insightful

      i'm responding tot he comment "vegas casinos were doing this for years". This comment implies that because a private company does it, it's ok for the govt to do it as well. i'm pointing out that the two situations are very different. +1 ontopic.

      there's nothing new or noteworthy about the technology. the new thing is it's in the hands of the govt.

    5. Re:Baaah... by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      Except some might argue that using this technology in a public place is a violation of the 4th amendment.

      This stuff is getting very creepy, and it's kind of appalling to see that the US is in a hurry to usher in Big Brother.

      Papers please, comrade. Actually, we don't need your papers. We know exactly who you are.

      How's that "land of the free" thing working out for you?

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  2. Re:So wear a Guy Fawkes mask by OhPlz · · Score: 3

    Anything done with our tax money should be done with the consent of the governed.

    I do not consent.

  3. Re:So wear a Guy Fawkes mask by Baby+Duck · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Once it's rushed out without our consent, all us dissenters can be cataloged and tracked :-(

    --

    "Love heals scars love left." -- Henry Rollins

  4. Re:So wear a Guy Fawkes mask by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I do not consent.

    Unfortunately, many of the sheep in this country (and elsewhere, particularly Australia and the British Empire) simply don't care.

    You are overruled. Move along...

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  5. Qualified to not qualify by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 5, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new, umm, overlords.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  6. Re:Dragnet by Nightwraith · · Score: 2

    Well, they'll just claim you're out in the public eye and don't have any expectation of privacy.

    I mean it's not like the Civil Forfeiture laws where they can take any cash/property on your person without cause or due process. You're not even required to have been *charged* with any crime. Stop & Frisk has been replaced with Seize & Threaten.

    They're betting that you'll walk away from lengthy, expensive legal fight to get your property/rights back.

  7. Re:So wear a Guy Fawkes mask by preaction · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do you mean politicians?

    With crime on an incredible downswing, I don't see how anyone can justify draconian measures for law enforcement when it is becoming less and less likely that they will be the victim of a crime.

  8. Re:So wear a Guy Fawkes mask by maharvey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wow, an insightful and rarely articulated point, supported by hard data! Where are mod points when I need them?

  9. Drivers license photos by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    State DMVs have for some time been compiling digital photo databases. I know Oregon has because they had to bring "someone more familiar with the software" in when they took my license photo. I have a sizable beard and mustache, and I believe the software had difficulty finding my mouth. ... I didn't offer to help.

    If cars are going to have some "if you aren't facing the road, we're going to shut the car off" routine, I may be somewhat restricted in my choice of automobile, or at least options packages...

  10. umm... by ComputersKai · · Score: 2

    There are always these: http://petapixel.com/2013/06/1...
    and of course, it'd be amusing to see what'd happen if you taped a picture of yours truly Mr. President onto you fac

  11. Re:So wear a Guy Fawkes mask by amiga3D · · Score: 2

    I see your point. The problem of course is when you become the criminal. In the future I suspect there will be a lot more restrictions. A lot more and they already have the system coming into place that will insure compliance with whatever they mandate. The reason of course is that in about 8 years or so the government will be bankrupt and when they can't write those checks without printing ridiculous amounts of phony money there will be a lot of people that will suddenly find their monthly check doesn't buy a living, even a meager one. That's the day they will need all this stuff to control a pissed off and hungry populace.

  12. Re:So wear a Guy Fawkes mask by OhPlz · · Score: 2

    No shit. Do you think the majority of the population supports this? Especially after all the known incidents of domestic spying, illegal wiretaps, secret no fly lists, free speech zones for demonstrators, etc. There's very little freedom left in our free country. I'm not against surveillance, but tracking each person individually is a slippery slope. Attend a protest the administration doesn't like, they pull the video footage, next thing you know.. everyone there is on a watch list and is about to be audited by the IRS. You might even end up on a secret list for health care, kind of like the secret waiting lists at the VA. Ooo, I'm sorry, we have no openings for you.

    By the way, your summary of our system of government is wrong. We elect people, but they don't represent us. Any talk of that ends the moment they win the election.

  13. Re:Sunglasses by AHuxley · · Score: 2

    Re sunglasses
    Fashion that will hide you from face-recognition technology ( 1/06/14)
    http://io9.com/how-fashion-can...
    "For example, if you are wearing sunglasses, the system will recognize the sunglasses and then ignore that part of your face. The program will then simply analyze whatever is left behind. "... "that it's possible to recognize faces with 30% and in some cases 50% occlusion."

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  14. Re: So wear a Guy Fawkes mask by Catbeller · · Score: 2

    Privacy an illusion? This is too easy. What's your name? Address? Children's names, sex ages, pics, and current locations?
    How much do you make? What's your car plate ID? I'm sure you won't mind sharing.