Slashdot Mirror


Seattle Passes Laws To Keep Residents From Wasting Food

schwit1 writes The new rules would allow garbage collectors to inspect trash cans and ticket offending parties if food and compostable material makes up 10 percent or more of the trash. The fines will begin at $1 for residents and $50 for businesses and apartment buildings. "SPU doesn’t expect to collect many fines, says Tim Croll, the agency’s solid-waste director. The city outlawed recyclable items from the trash nine years ago, but SPU has collected less than $2,000 in fines since then, Croll says. 'The point isn’t to raise revenue,' he said. 'We care more about reminding people to separate their materials.'"

385 comments

  1. Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by damn_registrars · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Even for the samzenpus failure machine, this article is terrible. In this case, the headline is a complete fabrication that does not reflect the reality of the article it links to or the ordinance passed by Seattle City Council. Sure, samzenpus is a hacktacular idiot who has many times before posted various rallying calls for conservatives to come have a circle-jerk here at slashdot, but this is even terrible for him. Will his next posting to the front page be about the "latte salute" from Obama?

    Samzenpus, isn't it time you go find a job you're qualified for? You certainly aren't qualified as an editor, even at this website. Fox News might be hiring... or maybe townhall.com?

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by jasonrice22 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Apparently they see that disposing of food in trash bins instead of compost is a waste. I don't see the problem with the headline.

    2. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by halivar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I read the article, and am having a hard time seeing where the summary is incorrect.

    3. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by kelemvor4 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Apparently they see that disposing of food in trash bins instead of compost is a waste. I don't see the problem with the headline.

      If you read TFA, the law seems to be about getting people to put stuff in the right bin. TFS makes it sound like the law is about waste. TFS seems and the headline seem to be deliberately misleading

      Here's a quote from TFA:

      “The point isn’t to raise revenue,” he said. “We care more about reminding people to separate their materials.”

    4. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Informative

      Apparently they see that disposing of food in trash bins instead of compost is a waste. I don't see the problem with the headline.

      That isn't what samzenpus is trying to get you to believe. samzenpus is a big believer in the conspiracy of the nanny state - see my journal article that links to all the bullshit he has funneled through to the front page - and he is trying to support the notion that the dirty hippies running Seattle are trying to force everyone to eat moldy vegetables. He isn't describing the wastefulness of compostable material entering the regular waste stream, he is trying to stir up fear of the imminent government takeover and micromanagement of your life.

      He could have fit a headline in up there that accurately summarizes the article, but he chose not to. In the same amount of space, a headline along the lines of "Seattle passes ordinance to encourage composting of waste food" would have been orders of magnitude more accurate and informative. He chose this awful headline to stir up excitement with the conservative base that has been steadily taking over what used to be a technology site here at slashdot.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    5. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by jasonrice22 · · Score: 0

      Did you read my comment that you replied to? I said that they see disposing of food in a landfill vs compost as a waste. The headline is legit.

    6. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by halivar · · Score: 1

      That quote from TFA is also in TFS. Did you read the summary?

    7. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes of course, that's what people mean when they say "wasting food".... putting it in a landfill instead of compost.

    8. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by halivar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      to excite slashdot's conservative majority

      Um, yeah, that's crazy talk.

    9. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Slashdot: "Seattle Passes Laws To Keep Residents From Wasting Food"

      Seattle Times: "Seattle OKs $1 fine for adding too much food to garbage bins
      Seattle residents could start getting small fines next year for putting too much compostable material into the trash."

      Those two titles don't agree with each other. The goal is not about stopping food waste but to make sure that compostable material does not end up in the trash.

      Somebody failed reading comprehension.

    10. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by AcidPenguin9873 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Seattle has not made it a fine-worthy offense to discard uneaten eat food, which is what the headline implies. Seattle residents are instead supposed to throw both uneaten food and the remnants of mostly-eaten food - as much of it as they want - into their composting bin, not the "regular" trash. The goal was to get people to compost compostable items (like food) instead of throw them into the trash. Not to prevent discarding uneaten food.

      I suppose since compost is later turned into fertilizer, composting is a bit less truly wasteful than throwing uneaten food into the "regular" trash, but I doubt that distinction is meaningful since in either case the food is no longer edible.

    11. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      The headline is part of the submission. Editors sucking at editing submissions has been an eternal Slashdot problem, but the person to blame is schwit1.

    12. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by jasonrice22 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm sorry, I don't know who samzenpus is. All that I see is a legitimate article/headline that's getting bashed because of preconceived notions based on fear that somewhere some municipality might regulate how people dispose of their trash. I am libertarian/conservative, and I don't see the problem with local regulation of trash disposal.

    13. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes of course, that's what people mean when they say "wasting food".... putting it in a landfill instead of compost.

      Usually "wasting food" means disposing of it (by whatever means: compost, landfill, etc) instead of, y'know, eating it. Usually this is caused by poor planning.

    14. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Telling someone who did RTFA to RTFS. This is figuratively dripping with (situational) irony.

    15. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      Please people, before you mod damn_registrars up, take a look at his comments. He's just harassing samzenpus.

      This article certainly is about wasting food.

      Landfill - a place to dispose of refuse and other waste material by burying it and covering it over with soil, especially as a method of filling in or extending usable land.

      If you put extra food in a landfill it becomes waste.
      If you put extra food into a compost bin, it becomes fertilizer.
      If you are putting extra food into the landfill you get a ticket.
      Therefor you are getting ticketed for "Wasting" food.
      It's not hard.

    16. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by causality · · Score: 1

      The headline is part of the submission. Editors sucking at editing submissions has been an eternal Slashdot problem, but the person to blame is schwit1.

      Fire an editor or two, starting with the consistently worst-performing, and Dice will have rediscovered a time-tested method by which employers have dealt with employees who don't even try to perform their jobs competently.

      As it stands now, they have little or no incentive to produce quality. If they had a sense of shame, embarassment, or pride in their work then that would at least be an improvement.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    17. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by ScentCone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      to excite slashdot's conservative majority

      OK, you got me. For a moment there I thought you were taking yourself seriously, and having a rant, however misguided. It's a shame there's no satire/sarcasm tag to reward you for your sense of humor. That was a good one!

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    18. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by thaylin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      When someone says "wasting food" It implies they mean actually wasting the food, as in not eating it all. Not that they are putting it in the incorrect bin, or recycling the food.

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    19. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that was the whole point of the comment. There's a /sarcasm at the end that got removed by slashdot.

    20. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      You have this backwards. Samzenpus thinks this is a great idea. He if far more MSNBC than FOXNews material.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    21. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by magarity · · Score: 1

      And then your HOA has a prohibition against composting. What do Seattle residents in that situation do?

    22. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then your HOA has a prohibition against composting. What do Seattle residents in that situation do?

      Do these people not have garbage disposals in their kitchen sinks? Is all of Seattle on septic systems rather than a city sewer?

    23. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by halivar · · Score: 2, Informative

      Really? At least once a week there is a story like this, chosen to excite the conservatives and to try to make the liberals look bad. Can you show me an article posted in the past several months that does the opposite? No, you cannot.

      Are you kidding me? Soulskill's got a dog-whistle called "climate change" he blows on every fucking day. Doesn't even matter what the article's about; the comment section derails immediately into diatribes against the evil nasty capitalists.

    24. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Wycliffe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If the conservatives didn't have the overwhelming majority voice here then why do all the front page articles sway to their side when they are about political topics?

      I know it's hard to believe but there are more than 2 sides to the political spectrum. There's not just conservatives and
      liberals. You're probably right that the majority of slashdot is "anti nanny state" but that doesn't mean that the majority
      are conservatives. The "anti nanny state" people are a mixture of anarchists, libertarians, conservatives, independents,
      and probably a few other groups I'm forgetting.

      If you want proof that slashdot is not majority conservative then look at how slashdot responds to issues like drug laws,
      global warming, evolution, the big bang, gay marriage, or anything religious and see if you still have the same opinion.

    25. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by halivar · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's a strange day. People read the article and rant about a summary they didn't read.

    26. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by damn_registrars · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      He's just harassing samzenpus.

      No. You should try taking your own advice of

      take a look at his comments

      Before you try to claim to have some understanding of my motivations here.

      I am not "harassing" samzenpus. Most likely he won't even read these comments. I am pointing out that samzenpus is just a prime example of how political - and conservative - this site has become. Slashdot used to be a place to come for news and discussions about technology. This article has nothing to do with technology, and samzenpus posts a lot of articles that don't have anything to do with technology.

      This article - as shown by the atrocious headline - was posted to excite the conservative base here at slashdot.

      If you put extra food in a landfill it becomes waste.

      That is not the point of the headline. This awful headline was chosen to get people excited about the "nanny state", "dirty hippies", and all that bullshit. Look at the other terrible articles that he has shepherded to the front page that I have mentioned before, and you'll see that this is not an outlier but part of a trend.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    27. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by AcidPenguin9873 · · Score: 1

      For everyone other than people trying to argue semantics on Slashdot, "wasting food" means discarding it uneaten. The fact that uneaten food that is discarded into a compost bin will be turned into fertilizer does not mean it was not wasted.

    28. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by odie5533 · · Score: 1
      Would that I had mod points. A very good explanation! Food can be wasted by not being eaten or by not being used to make fertilizer. Throwing food in the trash is a waste because it was not eaten and not used to make fertilizer.

      It is a waste of a clean glass bottle to throw it in the trash when it could be recycled.

    29. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Wycliffe · · Score: 2

      Oh, and I forgot a big one. Big business. Slashdot tends to be rather negative towards big business as well
      while traditional "conservatives" are usually pro business.

    30. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by thaylin · · Score: 2

      You are intentionally misrepresenting definitions., No matter where you put food you throw away it is food waste, no matter where you put it into the ground it also becomes fertilizer. If you are in the UK you may be able to get away with verbing a word like that to mean something it does not here in the US. Wasting food in the US means to throw it away rather then to eat it.

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    31. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 0, Troll

      So, garbage men in Seattle now have the authority to issue people tickets.

      Here in Vancouver, they just leave the garbage there in the street in front of your house, I've recently learned.

      God, I hate west coast culture.

      I chose to respond by going out at night and spreading my garbage up and down the streets.

      Fuckers wanna play passive aggressive games? I can play them too.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    32. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by ganjadude · · Score: 3, Interesting

      thats funny, Where I live our waste management company has gone in the reverse direction. We used to have like 15 bins (one paper - one food - one brown glass - one green glass, you get the point) and a few years back they consolidated. Now we have just 2 bins. one for garbage, and one for recyling. the separation is done at the plant now.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    33. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      he is trying to stir up fear of the imminent government takeover and micromanagement of your life.

      Not hard to do. Consider this micromanaging of your life by the nanny-state government:
      * Federal law restricts how much water can go down the drain each time you flush the toilet.
      * Federal law restricts how much electricity light bulbs may use.
      * Bloomberg tried to restrict the size of soft drinks.
      * Multiple states have restricted the number of rounds of ammo in a magazine.
      * Federal law mandates air bags in your car while some states don't even mandate helmets for riding a motorcycle.
      * Federal law mandates GPS in your phone so they know where you are.

      Do I need to go on or do you get the point?

    34. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I chose to respond by going out at night and spreading my garbage up and down the streets."

      Yeah, our culture on the West Coast sucks, and you are the sane one..... Moron.

    35. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      Our county did the same thing this year.

    36. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by klek · · Score: 2

      I'm going to regret jumping into this fray, but the venerable BBC's headline states:

            "Seattle to fine residents and businesses for wasting food"
            http://www.bbc.com/news/world-...

      Although the body of their article also has the same Croll quote and finer details.
      Perhaps reading comprehension and summarizing skills are in greater demand than we thought...

    37. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      I suppose since compost is later turned into fertilizer, composting is a bit less truly wasteful than throwing uneaten food into the "regular" trash, but I doubt that distinction is meaningful since in either case the food is no longer edible.

      The only "meaning" it has is to their particular recycling and waste disposal programs. As you say, this is not about waste at all. It is only about where to put different kinds of trash.

      It would be very similar to an ordinance that fines people for putting glass in the aluminum recycle bin.

    38. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by damn_registrars · · Score: 0

      If you want proof that slashdot is not majority conservative then look at how slashdot responds to issues

      I have...

      drug laws

      The paulowers on this site shout everyone else down with claims that legalizing everything will somehow make the world better. The very matter of drug laws is so hyperpolarized though that reasonable discussions are almost impossible everywhere.

      global warming

      Every week there is at least one article trying to debunk climate change. Almost never do we see a front page article supporting it.

      the big bang

      Even American conservatives are coming around to accept that the world is more than 6,000 years old. That said it is quite rare to see an article on it make it to the front page here as it just doesn't bring enough eyeballs.

      gay marriage

      Slashdot almost never touches on that topic on the front page, as it makes the conservative base look bad to endorse discrimination.

      anything religious

      Aside from the "atheists need Kirk" article last week, there has been almost nothing religious in terms of front page content here for quite a while.

      I know it's hard to believe but there are more than 2 sides to the political spectrum.

      Slashdot does not endorse the existence of more than two sides, because un-American. The rest of the world tends to see politics as being (at least) 2-dimensional rather than just a one-dimensional affair.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    39. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by HornWumpus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes. Choosing to cook brussel sprouts (aka stillborn cabbages) is poor planning.

      They do make good 'edible' missiles.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    40. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      I really hope if the waste company is making the people do their job for them ,they are at least lowering the bill

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    41. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      I am pointing out that samzenpus is just a prime example of how political - and conservative - this site has become.

      I assure you that the collective community is applauding your efforts to sleaze this place up. You've been around long enough to know that the old conservative vs liberal thing is a waste of electrons.

    42. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      And here I was thinking that liberals made up the majority on slashdot. At least that is the impression I get whenever somebody says something even remotely conservative or mentions God and suddenly gets modded troll and everybody slams them in their replies.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    43. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by PackMan97 · · Score: 2

      Really? At least once a week there is a story like this, chosen to excite the conservatives and to try to make the liberals look bad. Can you show me an article posted in the past several months that does the opposite? No, you cannot.

      Me thinks you doth protest too much.

      • Obama Presses China On Global Warming - Conservatives would argue global warming doesn't exist
      • South Australia Hits 33% Renewal Energy Target 6 Years Early - Conservatives know renewables will never work
      • Fukushima Radiation Still Poisoning Insects - Conservatives know nuclear power is safe
      • Study Links Pacific Coastal Warming To Changing Winds - More climate change claptrap

      ..and that's without going past the first two pages of headlines.

    44. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by jklovanc · · Score: 5, Informative

      Seattle collect compostable material from residents using a separate bin from the garbage bin. They in fact collect 3 kinds of bins; garbage, compostable, and recyclable.

    45. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      Please people, before you mod damn_registrars up, take a look at his comments. He's just harassing samzenpus.

      I agree that damn-registrars is being over the top; but I have to say when I read the headline and then read TFS I did a double-take - the two do not jibe.

      "Wasting food" is almost universally understood to mean that the food is being used for some other purpose than that of sustaining sentient life. It's NOT generally understood as specifically being 'put into the garbage bin' as opposed to being 'put into the compost bin' - I'm pretty sure most people view either of these fates for food as 'waste'. If I let food spoil when I could have eaten it, or if I take perfectly good food and incinerate it, it is still 'wasted' even though it doesn't "become waste" by virtue of being put into municipal landfill.

      If you're goint to take damn_registrars to task for attacking samzenpus I suggest you do it on the basis of his attack and his hyperbole, not on the basis of his otherwise sound reasoning.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    46. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      If you object to nanny state nonsense, the full article isn't any better. You are under the mistaken impression that there is an amount of lipstick you could put on this pig to make it acceptable.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    47. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by tiberus · · Score: 1

      Okay, so apparently I'm the only one that was left confused after reading the headline, which gave me a Detective Thorn ala Soylent Green flashback, and the summary, after-which I had that look dogs get when they're confused...

    48. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      You act like people trying to stir up a furor about the nanny state is a bad thing.

    49. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      Seattle has not made it a fine-worthy offense to discard uneaten eat food, which is what the headline implies.

      What definition of "waste" are you using that's synonymous with "discard"?

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    50. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems to me like you have more of an ax to grind than samzenpus does. You've certainly dedicated more word space to him than he did to the story itself. I also find it amusing that you think the nanny state description for a town that has essentially given its garbage men policing powers to enforce how citizens should sort their refuse as simply foil hat conspiracy. If you really think that moldy hotdogs and old fruits are what is filling up landfills or otherwise causing environmental problems, I invite to spend a day at ANY landfill across the country. Rotting food is the last thing that makes a difference in what is entering those landfills. But hey, I guess there's just no problem to small for liberals to take a pass at creating a burgeoning bureaucracy and enforcement machine over it. Oh, and BTW - ask your friendly bureaucrats what happens to all the carefully collected and sorted glass, plastic and cardboard when the recyclers' supply lines are backed up.

             

    51. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      Obama Presses China On Global Warming - Conservatives would argue global warming doesn't exist

      Which makes Obama look like an out-of-touch disconnected-from-reality liberal/socialist/fascist/hippie/Un-american/tree-hugger

      South Australia Hits 33% Renewal Energy Target 6 Years Early - Conservatives know renewables will never work

      Which just reinforces the isolationist ideal that the American way is the best way and the rest of the world doesn't matter.

      Fukushima Radiation Still Poisoning Insects - Conservatives know nuclear power is safe

      Which would be responded to by conservatives with the old "you have to break a few eggs to make an omelet" argument.

      Study Links Pacific Coastal Warming To Changing Winds - More climate change claptrap

      Conservatives actually love that argument because it largely discredits the anthropogenic component of climate change for that part of the world. IF they were to bother to read the article, they could use it to reinforce their old adage of "this just happens on its own".

      Me thinks you doth protest too much.

      I think you haven't been paying attention to what makes it to the front page.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    52. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      lol, so we have a far leftwing nut job yelling at a far rightwing nutjob and you're telling me you're helping? Get of the cross.

    53. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by bws111 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not a good explanation at all, just a clumsy attempt to justify poor writing.

      When the vast majority of the population talks of 'wasting food' they mean one thing - allowing otherwise edible material to become inedible. What happens AFTER it becomes inedible does not matter in the slightest. It does not matter if you put the stuff into the trash or compost, as far as being FOOD it has been wasted.

      A headline of 'Seattle Passes Law to Encourage Recycling Organic Material' would actually convey what happened. You may or may not agree with such a law, but at least you know what it is.

      A headline of 'Seattle Passes Law to Keep Residents From Wasting Food' tells you NOTHING about what they actually did. Are they going to restrict how many groceries a family can buy? Are they going to check your refrigerator to make sure you don't let leftovers go bad? Are they going to fine you for discard any food? The only reason to write such a stupid headline is as flamebait.

    54. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by spire3661 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Dude, a properly cooked brussel sprout is HEAVEN. It takes skill to make them right. Next time you are out at a higher end restaurant and they offer them, order them, trust me on this. My evil stepmother used to make me eat them and i hated them with a passion until i had one that was properly prepared.

      --
      Good-bye
    55. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 2

      I could burn it in the streets to get rid of it, I suppose.

      I already paid the city garbage man to come over here and get it once via my taxes and he didn't do the job... I'm not going to pay a second person to do it.

      If you instruct the garbage man to leave the garbage in the streets, you'll have to deal with garbage in the streets. Pretty simple. I'm not keeping it in my house.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    56. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BBC's headline of this story: "Seattle to fine residents and businesses for wasting food"

      I'm sure the Beeb is in on this Vast Right Wing Conspiracy too. If you think Slashdot is "too conservative," you might want to look into getting some professional help. Seriously.

    57. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds more like a terrible law - a true nanny state piece of legislation.. Any true conservative would argue that you should have enough brains in your thick skulled head to do this on your own w/o the need to threaten with fines.. But the leftists aren't too damn bright these days - so what can we expect.

      Sounds to me like you like that stuff, need a nanny? Maybe Obama will let Michelle, since you were ignorant enough to vote for him twice.

    58. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by whistlingtony · · Score: 2

      I pay a private company to take my trash. it's not taxes. You likely have the same situation.... so...

      Also, you're coming across as a total crank and making conservatives look bad.

      Seattle is trying to get people to put compost in the compost bins. They have tiny stupid $1 fines for not doing so... which they don't expect to have to give out that often anyway. What's the problem here beyond you hating the general rules of civilization?

    59. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please people, before you mod damn_registrars up, take a look at his comments. He's just harassing samzenpus.

      This article certainly is about wasting food.

      Landfill - a place to dispose of refuse and other waste material by burying it and covering it over with soil, especially as a method of filling in or extending usable land.

      If you put extra food in a landfill it becomes waste.
      If you put extra food into a compost bin, it becomes fertilizer.
      If you are putting extra food into the landfill you get a ticket.
      Therefor you are getting ticketed for "Wasting" food.
      It's not hard.

      Agreed that damn_registrars is just harassing samzenpus.
      However ...
      go ask some people for examples of "wasting food", and let us know how many respond with with "didn't clean their plates" and how many respond with "failed to put it in the correct bin".

    60. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      What is the alternative proposed by Seattle for dealing with food waste? Eat everything, even if it is spoiled or otherwise no longer edible? Is Seattle going to provide compost bins? They sure as hell aren't going to allow every single postage stamp lot to have a compost bin in it. First of all, the neighbors will complain about the smell and sight of the compost, and second, it is a fire hazard.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    61. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      When someone says "wasting food" It implies they mean actually wasting the food, as in not eating it all. Not that they are putting it in the incorrect bin, or recycling the food.

      Corn can be used to create ethanol fuel. Is such corn "wasted" because it is not eaten?

      Uneaten food that is diverted from landfill serves a purpose when it is rescued for composting, albeit one that was not intended when it was sold in the grocery store. Also, it reduces the use of valuable landfill space, thereby lowering the cost of trash disposal. So I would contend that it is not wasted (at least not entirely) when it is diverted from landfill.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    62. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by whistlingtony · · Score: 2, Insightful
      • Why is it bad that federal law mandates that toilets not be wasteful? Who gives a shit, if you'll pardon the pun? That's a good thing.
      • Why is it bad that federal law mandates listing the wattage used on a bulb? I can't make informed decisions if I don't have good information. Why is it bad that federal law mandates low wattage bulbs? Again, WGAS?
      • I don't live in NYC. I don't care about soft drink sizes. Also, you could drink as much soda as you wanted... just get two. WGAS?
      • magazine rounds. WGAS? If you need to go on a killing spree just bring more magazines....
      • Air bags are a good thing. So are helmets. So... what's your point? Some states let people do stupid things? WGAS?
      • No they don't.... I can turn my GPS off... of course, they can track what cell tower I'm talking to at the moment.

      There's no conspiracy here. Welcome to a civilized society. We have rules. Wwwwwooooooo!!!!! Big Scary Rules! There's no takeover. There's no micromanaging of your life. I live on the West Coast, in Portland, a supposed Liberal Bastion, and I live in Not Legal housing. Nobody gives a shit. The city knows....

      I just don't see why you people need to be victims. It's like you're not happy unless someone is repressing you, and if no one is you have to invent someone...

      The weird thing is, there are plenty of REAL instances of government oppressing people. Conservatives are usually the first to defend the government when that happens.... If those black people would just $BLAH that wouldn't have happened....

    63. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by whistlingtony · · Score: 1

      Actually, it usually derails into diatriabes about Climate Change being a hoax......

    64. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by whistlingtony · · Score: 1

      Oh no... techies are famously libertarian leaning. It comes from thinking they're so much smarter than everyone else.

    65. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 3, Informative

      Get them in season (early winter months), still on the stalk, and cook them properly (refer to the Good Eats episode on Brussels sprouts, for exmaple). There will still be some variations in quality based on the exact batch you have, but the best vegetables I've ever eaten have been when I found particularly good stalks of Brussel sprouts.

    66. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Zordak · · Score: 2

      Wow. Do you also take issue with MSNBC's overt conservative bias?

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    67. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no... techies are famously libertarian leaning. It comes being so much smarter than everyone else.

      FTFY

    68. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by swillden · · Score: 1

      Oh no... techies are famously libertarian leaning. It comes being so much smarter than everyone else.

      FTFY

      Well, at least you didn't say "from being much better writers than everyone else."

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    69. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is best put into storm drains down the block (not near your place). Maybe they need to hire some $20/hr burger king workers to remove it.

    70. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A headline of 'Seattle Passes Law to Encourage Recycling Organic Material' would actually convey what happened.

      Um, no. Encourage typically implies some type of incentive. 'Seattle Passes Law that Fines People for Not Recycling Used Food' is what happened.

    71. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by sjames · · Score: 1

      Only in a desperate "please won't you stuff me into the nearest locker" sense of legit.

      The residents are still free to waste all the food they want as long as they put it in the correct bin.

    72. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      It would be very similar to an ordinance that fines people for putting glass in the aluminum recycle bin.

      Not that similar. It is pretty clear that "glass" is not "aluminum", and "glass" has never been "aluminum", so putting glass into someone else's container that says "aluminum only" could reasonably be a crime.

      But food scraps and other bio-waste certainly are trash, so putting "trash" into your own "trash" container should not be a crime.

      In the general sense, this kind of regulation is nanny-state micromangement.

    73. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      I'm sure your neighbors appreciate the fact that you're a self absorbed twat.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    74. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by sandytaru · · Score: 4, Informative

      Lightly coat in olive oil. Lightly toss in sea salt (or Jane's Mixed Up Salt, if you're in the south.) Roast at 350F for one hour. They come out salty and crispy on the outside, and tender and sweet on the inside. Consume that day as they don't keep very well. But they're so delicious it shouldn't be a problem!

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    75. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by operagost · · Score: 1

      You're confusing them with socialists, I think. They're convinced they're so smart, they should make decisions for everyone else. Believing that I should allow other people to make their own choices seems to be the opposite of elitism.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    76. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by JDAustin · · Score: 1

      Fuck you...try eating them cooked in bacon grease.

    77. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by jlowery · · Score: 1

      The summary is a complete fail. Here in Seattle we have recyclable waste containers specifically for compostables. The fine is for not sorting your compostables (which are 'recyclable') from the true garbage that goes in a landfill. You can waste all the food you want, up to what your sizable compost bin will hold.

      --
      If you post it, they will read.
    78. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by AcidPenguin9873 · · Score: 1
    79. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Food scraps are "trash" in the same way that glass is "trash."

      Trash simply means "stuff you don't want," the city expects you to sort your "trash" into metal, glass, paper, organic, and other.

      If you don't like that, you can contract with someone else to haul your trash out of the city, or pay them to sort it and give it to the city.

    80. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You laugh, but actually MSNBC is extremely conservative by international standards.

      America is a crazy place, full of crazy people shooting each other with guns to avoid getting vaccinated.

    81. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Every group of people thinks that they are smarter than all the other groups and should be in charge of making decisions. The only difference being that the group I am in is correct.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    82. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      Too many of a group you don't like=any number greater than 0.

    83. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Same story here as sibling... here in Portland metro, I pay a private company to haul it off. I get three cans: yard waste (compost), recyclables, and garbage.

      'course, there have been times when they've left the recycling can sitting un-emptied because they saw a plastic bag in it (no, seriously... isn't that shit supposed to be recyclable)? No big, it's amazing how little I actually do throw away (just me n' the spouse, no kids in the house).

      Personally, I cannot wait to move into a completely rural area where I can either compost it or burn it. Saves $40/mo for as little as they have to do at my bit of the street.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    84. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      That's the way I eat them. Except I shred them instead of leaving them whole. Add a little yellow onion, some salt and peper and crumble the bacon over top.

    85. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      The problem, I believe, is not in the comprehension, but rather the pushing of some agenda.

    86. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by sumdumass · · Score: 0

      Also, you're coming across as a total crank and making conservatives look bad.

      How so? Is it a sign of being a conservative if you try to piss off the people pissing you off?

      I mean I do not get how you can draw the conclusion from a rant about the garbage man leaving the garbage at the curb.

    87. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is that relevant to food waste? Do you mean reverse direction like no direction?

    88. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Corn can be used to create ethanol fuel. Is such corn "wasted" because it is not eaten?

      The corn you eat makes crappy ethanol stock. What you want is called dent corn and it typically is not as sweat or as desirable to eat.

      Food is eaten. Corn is a type of food that can/could be put to useful service in other ways. Your conclusion doesn't work.

      Also, it reduces the use of valuable landfill space, thereby lowering the cost of trash disposal.

      Not really, it more or less shifts the costs. There is the resale on the back end but it often gets used for backfill at construction sites due to some arbitrary rules for how much compost needs to exist the areas per year.

    89. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Choosing to cook brussel sprouts (aka stillborn cabbages) is poor planning.

      Don't overcook them. Add a good splosh of lemon juice to the cooking water. And whatever you do, don't overcook them.

      They do make good 'edible' missiles.

      When I eat them they become a chemical weapon.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    90. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are such a bitter pussy.

    91. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by un1nsp1red · · Score: 1

      Bacon is huge. Definitely add it if you're cooking in the oven. I prefer grilling mine, though. They soak up mad grill flavor!

    92. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Go on, but please speak up.

      See, I'm already running for the hills wailing about how the tree knitting yoghurt huggers want to take away my hummer.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    93. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      You laugh, but actually MSNBC is extremely conservative by international standards.

      America is a crazy place, full of crazy people shooting each other with guns to avoid getting vaccinated.

      And I've heard people complain that fox news is too liberal. No matter how extreme you think someone is there is probably someone more extreme.

    94. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      If they had a sense of shame, embarassment, or pride in their work then that would at least be an improvement.

      Could happen, but they'd have to sober up first.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    95. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not say "wasting compostable materials," then? "Wasting food" implies something edible is being wasted, when, in all likelihood, the food they're throwing away is spoiled.

    96. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Kooonsty · · Score: 1

      Please people, before you mod damn_registrars up, take a look at his comments. He's just harassing samzenpus.

      This article certainly is about wasting food.

      Landfill - a place to dispose of refuse and other waste material by burying it and covering it over with soil, especially as a method of filling in or extending usable land.

      If you put extra food in a landfill it becomes waste. If you put extra food into a compost bin, it becomes fertilizer. If you are putting extra food into the landfill you get a ticket. Therefor you are getting ticketed for "Wasting" food. It's not hard.

      Don't forget the ever important... If you put extra food into your mouth you get waist

    97. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by nytes · · Score: 1

      Um, no.

      Los Angeles, and many communities here in California, do the same thing as Seattle as far as trash collection. Every home gets 3 bins: trash, recycle, and compost (which also includes yard trimmings). All three are collected by the city once a week and dealt with accordingly.

      The stuff from the compost bins eventually finds its way back to stores as "California Compost".

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
    98. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hear hear.
      My fear is the idiot city council in Austin will do the same thing. They are as stupid as citizens in CA and WA.

    99. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Obfuscant · · Score: 1, Troll

      Why is it bad that federal law mandates that toilets not be wasteful?

      That's not what federal law mandates. It doesn't say "thou shall not be wasteful", it says "thou may use only X gallons per flush". The result is, in many cases, people have to flush twice to get one dump handled properly. Sometimes three or four times. What is being wasted? Water, which goes either to the septic tank and back into the local water table, or to the waste processing plant to be recycled back into the global water cycle.

      Why is it bad that federal law mandates listing the wattage used on a bulb?

      Who said it was? The problem is the LIMIT, not the listing.

      I don't live in NYC. I don't care about soft drink sizes.

      When they came for the soft drinks, I didn't say anything because I didn't drink soft drinks. When they came for the twinkies ...

      magazine rounds. WGAS? If you need to go on a killing spree just bring more magazines....

      Why yes, because the only use for guns are to go on killing sprees.

      Air bags are a good thing. So are helmets. So... what's your point?

      Government mandates for "good things" to "protect us from ourselves".

      No they don't.... I can turn my GPS off...

      The moment you call 911 the GPS turns on. AND they track the cell tower.

      Welcome to a civilized society. We have rules.

      Your problem appears to be that you equate "civilized society" with "government rules". It is possible to have the former without a ridiculous amount of the latter.

      There's no micromanaging of your life.

      If the government can fine you because you threw an apple core in the trash, yes, there is micromanagement.

    100. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      While it's not technically a tax, since it's "required" (at the moment I can only find city sites that say it's required, not a reference to an actual law), it is _effectively_ a tax.

    101. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Food scraps are "trash" in the same way that glass is "trash."

      Perhaps. That's not the issue at hand. I'll try to put it in the ubiquitous ACT or SAT analogy:

      True or false: glass : aluminum recycling :: food scraps : trash

      You've happily chosen to compare glass to trash, which isn't the proper ordering of the problem. The question is, is putting glass in aluminum recycling container similar to putting food scraps in the trash, and would laws treating both in a similar way be reasonable?

      Were the question on the table whether laws covering the placement of glass in the trash justifiable on the similarity to putting food scraps in the trash, you'd have a point.

    102. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Do you cut them in half first?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    103. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      >'course, there have been times when they've left the recycling can sitting un-emptied because they saw a plastic bag in it (no, seriously... isn't that shit supposed to be recyclable)?

      No, not by the same place. Municipal curbside recycling normally can't accept plastic bags; the machines they use to sort them will get jammed up by plastic bags, so you're supposed to just put loose recyclables in there.

      You can recycle plastic bags, but only separately, and usually only at certain stores (like grocery stores) which have special receptacles for them. I imagine they have a totally different process for dealing with plastic bags than for anything else; they probably just melt them down.

    104. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I do something similar.
      I cook the bacon, slice the Brussels sprout in to quarters, slice some onion.

      Then I through away that shit and eat the bacon.

      Stop adding stuff to bacon. It lowers the bacon to whatever you adding to it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    105. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Grishnakh · · Score: 0

      England these days is becoming much like America and turning to radical (read: fascist) conservatism. That's one reason Scotland was keen to become independent, because the Scots are more politically liberal than the English.

    106. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by geekoid · · Score: 1

      putting food down the drain makes it more expensive to process the water.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    107. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The moment you call 911 the GPS turns on. AND they track the cell tower.

      There's a simple solution to this:
      Don't call 911. When you've injured yourself with a power tool, just go ahead and bleed to death rather than calling 911, so that the Gubmint can't track you.

    108. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      >Fukushima Radiation Still Poisoning Insects - Conservatives know nuclear power is safe
      Which would be responded to by conservatives with the old "you have to break a few eggs to make an omelet" argument.

      I can't imagine why Fukushima would have anything to do with the argument over nuclear power is safe in the modern day. It should only be a poster child for why it's a bad idea to have an old nuclear plant located next to the ocean where it can be hit by a tsunami. That plant was just a disaster from an engineering standpoint: bad location, bad design, bad redundant systems, etc. There's plenty of reactors worldwide located in safe areas that don't have these problems. The French seem to do a pretty good job with their nuclear power industry; when was the last time they had some big disaster?

    109. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except food scraps have been classified as "compostable", and the rule says, "no compostables in the trash bin".

      How hard can it be?

      But, then again, I live about a mile from a major recyclables collection facility. The recycle bins at apartments, etc., clearly say "no cardboard boxes. They can be recycled at the [nearby recyclables collection facility]". So, what do people do? Well, I guess it's OK, sort of, that they stuff their large recyclables bins with all those cardboard boxes, instead of their much smaller garbage bins, or, breaking from Pacific NW passive-aggressive default behavior, simply leaving them outside on the ground for the WMX garbage & recycle collectors to figure it out for them.

    110. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time I tell the truth about how niggers have sub-par intelligence I always get modded Troll or Flamebait. If that isn't proof enough that this place is controlled by liberals, I don't know what is.

    111. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look dumass[sic], I have to explain this shit to you all the time. Shieldwolf said that garbage men now have the authority to issue tickets and he's pissed about it. That is a hallmark of conservatives everywhere. The gubmint tryin to invade mah freedumbs and garbage! Whistlingtony is obviously a liberal hippy because he's all for it. Why is this fucking hard for you to understand? Oh cause you're just sumdumass.......

    112. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 2

      Wrong. You probably got masking flavors.

      http://www.nature.com/news/200...

    113. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and that somebody is you.

      "Waste" is a vague word. It has a whole spectrum of meaning. "Wasting food" is not some rigidly-defined standard that can only mean one thing, it means many things in different contexts.

      Not everything is about scoring political points, you know. The headline isn't "deliberately misleading", it's just "vague", which is true of approximately 100% of all headlines ever written anywhere.

    114. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Lehk228 · · Score: 0

      leftists don't need any help to look bad. all you have to do is look at the bullshit they spew

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    115. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Your "revenge" sounds like the actions of a crank to me. It has successfully pissed off all your neighbours, but the garbo, even if he notices the rubbish, doesn't give a flying fuck what your street looks like.

      As for political labels - My 80yo parents are "conservatives", they would never dream of littering any street let alone their own. I'm not sure the english language has a general label for the political opinions you post but the majority of them are much too radical to be labeled "conservative".

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    116. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 0

      What's the problem here beyond you hating the general rules of civilization?

      This is pretty typical of Seattle politics. It's about image rather than substance. This is the Seattle council wagging their fingers at us.

      On the other hand, we have the mayor of Seattle refusing to consider declaring regions of the city as "no panhandling" zones. A man who runs a local hotel is pushing the idea after being assaulted by a homeless man for the *second* time. The mayor flatly refused, saying instead that they should instead do more to enforce existing laws - which of course, they don't.

      So people continue to be harassed or even assaulted on the streets of Seattle by vagrants, but by the earth goddess, you'd better not be putting too much food waste in your trash bin!

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    117. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by penix1 · · Score: 1

      Personally, I cannot wait to move into a completely rural area where I can either compost it or burn it. Saves $40/mo for as little as they have to do at my bit of the street.

      Even in rural areas there are restrictions on what you can burn and when you can burn it. I live in one of the most rural areas in the country here in West Virginia and can tell you that you can be fined if you burn the wrong things at the wrong times.

      Things like plastic, painted materials or other hazardous materials such as furniture foam and rubber are banned. That still doesn't stop people from doing it but the fines can get very steep especially for repeat offenders.

      --
      This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
    118. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      No, we've got compost bins already in the Seattle area, in addition to garbage and recycling bins. Generally speaking, the council is trying to reduce the amount of food waste sent to landfills by passing this law. Anything in compost bins is essentially recyclable material, so it's not considered "waste" in the broader sense.

      I still say this is a ridiculous law, but it's not about discarding food - it's just about sorting it properly.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    119. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to prove yourself a mindless tool of the system. You've been trained to chastise those who fight back against injustice. Next you'll tell him the "proper channels" he should direct his complaint to, where they can be utterly ignored and the problem go unsolved.

    120. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Of course it's a tax by a different name, you live under three tiers of governments, local governments are the bottom tier and have the right to charge property owners rates and fees and issue fines for by-law infringements such as parking tickets, etc. A good local government can make a huge difference to the local economy by improving the general appearance and amenities of the town. A shitty one will do nothing and charge extra for that level of "freedom".

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    121. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by penix1 · · Score: 1

      The residents are still free to waste all the food they want as long as they put it in the correct bin.

      Although the issue here is about what bin you put waste food into, let me point you to a 1998 article on the topic of waste landfills and the types vs. the time of decomposition:

      http://www.engr.wisc.edu/news/...

      The point I am trying to make is that this law is targeting the wrong thing.

      The study found that food decomposes relatively quickly. After six years in the Madison site, pasta, lima beans, peanuts and sunflower seeds all lost at least half of their dry weight, and pasta almost completely vanished. In Florida, the food samples were all more than 75 percent decomposed after only two years.

      Newspaper was the only material that showed little change: Only 17.4 percent decomposed in Florida after two years, and 8.5 percent in Madison after six years.

      Given a choice, putting the fine on paper products especially newspaper makes more sense from the point of view of reducing landfill real estate. Of course, someone putting food in the paper bin would upset the recycling process a miniscule amount not one that is too difficult to solve at the dump site. I suspect this is more about generating more revenue selling the compost since that pile would be reduced from wrong bin sorting. That's just my speculation though not supported by any facts.

      --
      This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
    122. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by penix1 · · Score: 1

      Double posting from the same article with this nugget:

      Why the difference? The Florida landfill did not have a clay cap during the study, which would have sealed it from the elements. Caps are federally mandated to reduce pollution from water flowing into landfills. In the process, however, they reduce moisture content in the waste, the "master variable" in helping garbage decompose.

      http://www.engr.wisc.edu/news/...

      Does anyone know if that capping is still a federal mandate? If so, this is a case where regulation against one hazard is creating another.

      --
      This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
    123. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by OhPlz · · Score: 1

      The people that came up with this inane idea aren't twats too? Tossing stuff in other people's bins was the first thing I thought of too.

    124. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

      I trim them and put them in a small pot, add water to cover and about 10 percent lemon juice to it, add some salt and a teaspoon of butter - bring to a boil, then cover and shut off the heat. wait 30 minutes.

      If you want to be like my mom, make a small cut on the stalk end that looks like a plus sign.

      Great fiber! I've passed some great slashdot articles that way :)

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    125. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I live in an apartment in Bellevue, and the recycling bins here have a list of things that you can put in there, which includes plastic bags.

    126. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by damn_registrars · · Score: 0

      You have this backwards. Samzenpus thinks this is a great idea. He if far more MSNBC than FOXNews material.

      Samzenpus's history of posting conservative FUD to the front page of slashdot for the sole purpose of making non-conservatives look bad is clear demonstration to the contrary of your claim. He has been allowed to post garbage like this to the front page for years.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    127. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Why is it bad that federal law mandates that toilets not be wasteful?

      Because the feds are not supposed to regulate toilets. It's something that the states can and should handle themselves.

      Why is it bad that federal law mandates listing the wattage used on a bulb?

      Because the feds are not supposed to regulate light bulbs. It's something that the states can and should handle themselves.

      I am a liberal, by the way, and I live in a liberal state. The way I see it, we can regulate all that stuff just fine ourselves (or not, if we so choose). There's no reason why the feds have to be involved into it at all.

    128. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      I chose to respond by going out at night and spreading my garbage up and down the streets. Fuckers wanna play passive aggressive games? I can play them too.

      I can see the passive part, but where is the aggressive part?

      Did you also stop smiling, waving, and saying “Hey-Diddly-Ho! Mr. garbage men" every time they drove by?

    129. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're stupid enough to buy into a subdivision with an HOA, you deserve to be fined, jailed, or at least mocked.

    130. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Locando · · Score: 1

      Hey look, it's that famed West Coast sense of humor as well!

    131. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Compost bins actually cost for the additional service and no one in my neighborhood actually has one.

      The reality is that you would only get fined if you tossed in weed clippings in a very obvious manner.

      I will continue to throw my shit in the garbage.

    132. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you gotta admit, like any other train wreck, he can draw a crowd. What he really attracts are flies.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    133. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seattle does consolidated recycling, but compost (including yard and food waste) and trash are separate giving us three bins.

    134. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will continue to throw my shit in the garbage.

      You are doing it the hard way. The rest of the civilized world uses a toilet.

    135. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      [Sic] that doesn't mean what you think it does. You certainly are failing to use it properly.

      And yes, you have to explain this shit all the time because it makes absolutely no sense to anyone but yourself.

      Anyways, using your craptastic logic, i suppose all those people bitching about stop and frisk or NSA spying are conservatives by default too.

      Yes, your logic fails, you fail.

    136. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I think you better check who posted that again.

      You suffer the same problem i do- what was posted has nothing to do with being a conservative and cannot see how someone could imagine it did. It sounds more like third grade revenge logic if anything. But the illusions people maintain in order to support their own beliefs and ideologies will cloud reality i guess.

    137. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      Unlike the shit I flush into the same system?

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    138. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow you are blind. There are definitely a few conservatives that appear in the comments, but they are drowned out by liberal thinking. You must be REALLY far left to think slashdot is conservative. And I don't see what you are talking about with the articles. You may be able to find a few with a conservative viewpoint, but you would have to cherry pick to get that idea. And lets not forget this is /supposed/ to be a site about technology/Linux/open source. None of the topics you mentioned really fit that category.

    139. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anecdotally, most of the anti-vaccine people I have seen are the left-wing hippie types who crusade against GMOs and modern medicine.

    140. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and I forgot to add Gluten to that list.

    141. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by dave420 · · Score: 2

      I see it now. Let me help:

      1. Most people who use the toilet urinate and not defecate, so less water in this instance saves water. Not everyone who goes to defecate drops monster bombs which require two flushes. You have picked an edge case and sneakily tried to present it as anything but. Tut tut.

      2. We all have to share electricity. It's finite. In order to share, we have to limit how much each person can draw. We can do that by having an Energy Cop in each person's house, shaking their head and taking notes each time a light is turned on, or we can implement sensible moves to wean people off needlessly wasting most of the energy some devices consume. Incandescent bulbs are, from a light-producing standpoint, woefully inefficient. From a space-heating standpoint, they're much better. I think you can agree that people using heaters for light is not a good use of a finite, shared resource. If people were sensible, this legislation wouldn't be required.

      The soft-drinks thing was pretty silly, but again - a shared resource is being depleted by muppets. The resource in this case is healthcare. The better way for dealing with this would be by preemptive healthcare, but there's not much money in that (in fact, for healthcare providers, less), so it's not really an option. You are confusing government with the bad decisions some governments have made.

      There's a difference between a person who's gone (and who continues to go) out of their way to demonstrate their responsibility enough to own a device whose only reason for existing is to put holes in usually-living things, and the current state of practical free-for-all under the guise of a poorly-interpreted 200-year-old anachronism. He also didn't say that all gun use was for mass-killings - you did.

      Air bags and seatbelts save everyone the hassle of having to pay for people to scrape up parts of skull and teeth from the road, or having to pay for lengthy recuperation in hospital, or suffering the economic shortcomings their absence from the workforce might entail. No man is an island, and when said man is splattered across the highway, it affects many people. This isn't difficult to understand.

      Don't like the cops knowing where you are when you call 911? Don't buy a phone with GPS, or don't use your phone to call 911. Most [sane] people don't have a problem with the people you're calling for help to know where you are. In fact, they see that as a very nice thing indeed, especially if you are calling for help and can't talk (due to menace or injury).

      A truly civilised society wouldn't need these rules, but as people like you exist (who can't see past the end of their nose, and who analyse every rule by seeing how it affects them, and only them) rules have to be put in place to stop them from seriously screwing everyone over through their sheer selfishness and ignorance of how their actions affect others.

      Throwing an apple away isn't going to get you a fine. You are so dramatic it's amazing. No wonder you're so uptight and confused - you haven't a clue what's going on, and your ignorance and fear is screaming that it's all bad as you are so wonderful and important and can't understand it.

      Oh well. You get the country you deserve. Have fun!

    142. Re: Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That isn't what I mean when I say to my kids "don't waste food". I am saying it is wasteful if they don't eat it, had nothing to do with how that waste is handled later.

      Perhaps some day a government goon will be assigned to ensure everyone eats their peas.

      Also because I'm that guy, if i was ever taken to court on BS like this I would delay and delay and then when it came time for trial demand to see the evidence and chsllenge the chain of custody. Most people pay fines and tickets. I know it is about revenue and control. So I fight them so that it costs the city more than they will ever collect, win or lose, at the end I inform them it will be like this every time. You laugh, but it is about raising money, also by doing jail time instead of paying cash for speeding tickets, has resulted in me no longer getting tickets on my way home. About 3 times a year they pull me over and ask me to show down because of construction or something ahead or down road and guess what ... I listen because at that point it is about safety, not about revenue or control.

    143. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      If you want to be technical, socialists believe individuals should not profit from owning the means of production. If you mean social welfare people, they don't generally want to make rules on how people live their lives, but do believe in helping them when they're down and compensating for social disadvantages. People on all sides of the political spectrum want to make decisions for me. It's usually the conservatives, for example, who tell me what my religious life should be. (The atheist extremists seem perfectly happy if I keep my religious life to myself, and they're far outnumbered by the people who believe my tax money should support Christianity.)

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    144. Re: Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by jackspenn · · Score: 1

      It's actually more libertarian than conservative. You idiot.

      --
      Respect the Constitution
    145. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by dave420 · · Score: 1

      No, it settles into a discussion between people regurgitating previously-debunked Koch brothers claims that there is a hitherto-unseen global conspiracy among scientists (who would get incredibly wealthy if they spoke out about it), armchair climatologists who frequently confuse cause and effect, climate and weather, and people who accept the scientific method.

    146. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Fukushima was a good example of a bad nuclear plant. Chernobyl is simply over the top. Since we will always have well-run and poorly-run power plants, another Fukushima is a possibility (unlike another Chernobyl). We can probably, over time, change things so that another Fukushima could not happen, but it will take time and political will (which mostly seems split between believing reactors are safe enough, which is a defensible position, and believing they're always too dangerous).

      As far as nuclear disasters go, we've had two in the entire history of nuclear power. (Three Mile Island had barely any effect outside the plant.) There's really no statistical evidence for any country's reactors being safer than any other country's, so we'd have to determine this by examining the reactors and their operation.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    147. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa!!! One hour? Are you nuts? Roast for about 18 - 20 minutes at 375 and they'll turn out perfect. They keep just fine for days in the fridge. No idea if the previous commenter has ever actually cooked brussel sprouts or if they just read something somewhere and decided to repeat it, but I roast them several times a month. Fantastic food. (the olive oil and sea salt recommendation is spot on though)

    148. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by MooseMiester · · Score: 1

      I know, it's pure clickbait, which seems to occur more and more here.

      I'd love to know if stories designed to bring out the conservatives end up with higher PPC income, because the conservatives actually have money... They certainly aren't getting rich with CPI, nobody is in this market.

      --
      Murphy was an optimist
    149. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by TheGreatMcCluck · · Score: 1

      Feeling a little envious. Here in BC, the patients running the asylum decided that we have to take all our glass to recycling centers ourselves now. No more pickup. So naturally, our landfills should be getting a generous supply of glass in the mix now.

    150. Re: Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn_registars, you poor little boo-boo, being confronted with political perspectives at variance with your own. How do you make it through the day?

    151. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Here is my problem.

      The goal was to get people to compost compostable items (like food) instead of throw them into the trash.

      First: just to be clear:

      Compost is organic matter that has been decomposed and recycled as a fertilizer and soil amendment. Compost is a key ingredient in organic farming. At the simplest level, the process of composting simply requires making a heap of wetted organic matter known as green waste (leaves, food waste) and waiting for the materials to break down into humus after a period of weeks or months. Modern, methodical composting is a multi-step, closely monitored process with measured inputs of water, air, and carbon- and nitrogen-rich materials.
      People excrete far more of certain water-soluble plant nutrients (nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium) in urine than in feces. Human urine can be used directly as fertilizer or it can be put onto compost. Adding a healthy person's urine to compost usually will increase temperatures and therefore increase its ability to destroy pathogens and unwanted seeds. Urine from a person with no obvious symptoms of infection is generally much more sanitary than fresh feces.
      It provides a rich growing medium, or a porous, absorbent material that holds moisture and soluble minerals, providing the support and nutrients in which plants can flourish, although it is rarely used alone, being primarily mixed with soil, sand, grit, bark chips, vermiculite, perlite, or clay granules to produce loam. Compost can be tilled directly into the soil or growing medium to boost the level of organic matter and the overall fertility of the soil. Compost that is ready to be used as an additive is dark brown or even black with an earthy smell

      My problem is that Seattle has no use for compost other than to green its grass and trees. So the only viable use would be to sell it. That is ok if the citizens authorized that idiocy (Its idiocy because the midwest makes more and uses it more but I digress). Its even forethinking. However, forcing the citizens to dump their food into a compost bin or be fined is Govt abuse and waste.
      Its not at the level of Ferguson. Its on the same as the NYC pop ban.
      I do have a sister who moved to there from the Midwest and its all hills and mountains, so assuming its not for profit, what would they be growing?
      I believe that they are making a profit off the citizens and pocketing it and those who refuse to participate are fined. That is a real problem.
      If I want to throw away my left over food into a bin where it rots along side paper boxes, old shoes and metal cans inside of a bag that takes 300 yrs to decompose that is my right do that. Especially if they stated goal is lets make movney off your work because we dont want to have to bury it somewhere.
      WTF do you think those mountais are there for? Looking at? You either burn it, bury it or recycle it. If you want to recycle you do it on YOUR DIME and you dont steal from the peoples pocket to do it. How about take it from your over paied govt reps?

    152. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being? Is. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sci... And don;t give me that BS about how Hypothesis and theory have been twisted into different words. Hypothesis is a an idea about something and the tests used to test that. It leads to a working Theory. Theories are NOT facts. They might contain them from the tests done. Fact; Obama gave an improper salute because he was unwilling to take the time to hand off his cup of coffee. Climate change is a hoax because there simply isn't enough info to DO the tests required to go beyond the hypothesis stage. You cant do the tests because there is no Unflawed info.

    153. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by thunderclap · · Score: 1

      MSNBC has conservative bias? You mean against Conservatives, right. MSNBC is so hard core liberal that they would allow a serial killer on a show if he spouted their ideology.

    154. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by thunderclap · · Score: 1

      Please people, before you mod damn_registrars up, take a look at his comments. He's just harassing samzenpus.

      This article certainly is about wasting food.

      Landfill - a place to dispose of refuse and other waste material by burying it and covering it over with soil, especially as a method of filling in or extending usable land.

      If you put extra food in a landfill it becomes waste. If you put extra food into a compost bin, it becomes fertilizer. If you are putting extra food into the landfill you get a ticket. Therefor you are getting ticketed for "Wasting" food. It's not hard.

      You ignored one problem. A landfill is a hole in the GROUND .
      Food going there still becomes compost. Its just not accessible to the city. The city wants the compost for something and is willing to fine citizens for it. For what is a valid question. The post is still poorly crafted.

    155. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by thunderclap · · Score: 1

      Not a good explanation at all, just a clumsy attempt to justify poor writing.

      When the vast majority of the population talks of 'wasting food' they mean one thing - allowing otherwise edible material to become inedible. What happens AFTER it becomes inedible does not matter in the slightest. It does not matter if you put the stuff into the trash or compost, as far as being FOOD it has been wasted.

      A headline of 'Seattle Passes Law to Encourage Recycling Organic Material' would actually convey what happened. You may or may not agree with such a law, but at least you know what it is.

      A headline of 'Seattle Passes Law to Keep Residents From Wasting Food' tells you NOTHING about what they actually did. Are they going to restrict how many groceries a family can buy? Are they going to check your refrigerator to make sure you don't let leftovers go bad? Are they going to fine you for discard any food? The only reason to write such a stupid headline is as flamebait.

      No, A better headline would be: Seattle Passes Law to Force Recycling Organic Material' You don't encourage people with a fine. A fine is a punishment for failing to do what is told. Seattle wants people to recycle so they can make compost. My question is why?

    156. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess if the bins are there, then this is about properly separating, which people absolutely should do and there is no need for the sensationalism in the summary or title.
      Where I live, there is literally nothing you are allowed to do with yard waste. We have only a trash can, no recycle or compost bins. We are not allowed to put yard waste in the trash can. We are not allowed to burn yard waste. We are not allowed to compost. Yard waste is not accepted at the dump.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    157. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by bws111 · · Score: 1

      OK, if you want to call a $1 fine 'force', go ahead. You will note that this is similar to the fines they have already been assessing for 3 years for putting recyclables in the trash, and in all that time have only had $2000 worth of fines.

      As for why, it is pretty obvious. It is not that they 'want to make compost', it is that they DON'T want recyclable material in the landfills. Once something is in a landfill it is there, taking up space, pretty much forever. Landfills get full and must be closed, and new landfills built. Both of those are expensive (and environmentally unfriendly).

      If they compost, on the other hand, they wind up with something useful, which can be sold to help pay for the landfills. Composted material does not become your problem forever, landfilled material does.

      I doubt very much that they care what you do with your recyclables, as long as they don't wind up in the landfill.

    158. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by JimFive · · Score: 1

      Saves $40/mo for as little as they have to do at my bit of the street.

      You might want to check on if they have a "per bag" rate (probably unadvertised). My parents switched after they found out about it and save quite a bit every month.
      --
      JimFive

      --
      Please stop using the word theory when you mean hypothesis.
    159. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't the crispy outside taste extremely bitter? I have only had them roasted once at a friend's house and I could barely get past the bitterness. I'll go for steamed until still firm and covered in butter. Simple, but nutritious and delicious.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    160. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by bws111 · · Score: 1

      What happens with a hole in the ground when you keep indiscriminately putting stuff in that you can't access? In case you don't know, it becomes full. And when it becomes full you have to cap it (expensive) and properly prepare a new hole (more expensive). I'll leave it to you to try and figure out why the city (and I am guessing the vast majority of it's citizens) think that is a bad thing.

    161. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      You have picked an edge case and sneakily tried to present it as anything but.

      That's why I said "many" and not "most", or "all". Saving water is nice, except that for many people it simply goes back into the local water table and their well just sucks it back up to be reused.

      In order to share, we have to limit how much each person can draw.

      No, we don't. We can allow people to use what they want to pay for.

      The soft-drinks thing was pretty silly, but again - a shared resource is being depleted by muppets.

      I'm sorry, what? Soft drinks are not a "shared resource", they are a commercially made product, and if a store runs out they order more. Any argument that you shouldn't be able to buy a 32 oz soft drink because it is abusing a shared resource is just nuts.

      The resource in this case is healthcare.

      Ahhh, so you think that every person who drinks a 32 oz soft drink has to go to the hospital to, umm, what, pee? Sorry. That's also nuts.

      There's a difference between a person who's gone (and who continues to go) out of their way to demonstrate their responsibility enough to own a device whose only reason for existing is to put holes in usually-living things,

      I think you're referring to guns here, but I can't tell for sure. You flamed me for what you thought was an overstatement about how many times a low-flow toilet needed to be flushed and now you drop this gem about the "only reason for existing" for guns.

      I hate to burst your bubble, but clay targets have never been alive so "usually-living" doesn't apply, and by the time a paper target is tacked up to something it is long-dead wood. I supposed you are opposed to bow and arrow enthusiasts because the paper targets (and bales of hay) they use were "usually-living"?

      Don't like the cops knowing where you are when you call 911?

      I'm sorry, did you read me saying that anywhere?

      A truly civilised society wouldn't need these rules,

      A civilized society doesn't need these rules, and we got along for a very long time without them. Trying to claim that you can't have a civilized society without them is, well, you used the word "sneakily" when you misinterpreted what I wrote. I'd call what you're doing less than sneaky, and pretty disingenuous.

      rules have to be put in place to stop them from seriously screwing everyone over through their sheer selfishness

      Right. You are SO seriously screwed over because I own a 15 round magazine, or because I drink a 32 oz diet soft drink every so often, or because my cell phone doesn't have a GPS in it. Yeah. It is such an inconvenience to you that I have some freedom to make my own choices about what I do.

      Throwing an apple away isn't going to get you a fine.

      Did you not even bother to read the summary? Putting compostable items in the trash can result in a fine. Or don't you know that an apple core is compostable?

      Oh well. You get the country you deserve. Have fun!

      No, I don't get the country I deserve, because "people like you" (as you so civilly put it) think they're being so inconvenienced by other people having the ability to choose how they run their own lives. How did you put it? "seriously screwing everyone over through their sheer selfishness". Right. It absolutely ruins your life because I have an incandescent bulb where you think I ought to have an environmentally destructive CFL.

      Guess what? I bought into the CFL nonsense and now I have a couple of places in my house that I have to predict when I'll need light because the damn CFL lighting takes several minutes to warm up and start emitting enough light. And I've got to worry about where I dispose of the dead ones (that didn't last as long as the last incandescent

    162. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The aggressive part is them not doing their job ie hauling off the damned trash. I'm sure they also get that awesome smug sense of "power" when they can effectively tell you to fuck off (leaving the trash) by not playing by their rules. Not understanding that people do things to spite each other, as if we're all perfectly reasonable actors, is willful ignorance on your part.

    163. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they answered your first "caveat" as if you've thought of something no one else has. So come on, try again with another "example". Tighten the requirements and add a little more absurdity and eventually you'll find "evidence" that this is an utter failure of a project.

    164. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or he can take the Libertarian route and have someone drive him there in his personally owned vehicle. But you're a republitard so I guess you would rather him just die in the streets.

    165. Re: Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Deep thought for the day: if government didn't provide free garbage pickup would people still produce so much waste?

    166. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by whistlingtony · · Score: 1

      It's not required. You can take your own trash to the dump.... No one makes you pay the garbage company.

    167. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by whistlingtony · · Score: 1

      So many stupid replies, I'll reply to myself. I should have just said this; There are so many REAL instances of police militarization, illegal wiretapping of US citizens, killing US citizens without a trial... These are the things that anger Liberals. When a conservative bashes the governement for taking over, the examples seem to be toilet flushes, light bulbs, and soft drink size restrictions......

    168. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 1

      This is actually false in many cities in the Seattle area now. Many of them actually do force you to sign up for garbage service. If you refuse to pay, they send you to collections and do their best to make your life hell. I believe Kent is now one of those cities (about a half hour south of Seattle). Thankfully I'm in a city that doesn't do that (yet), but I've heard talk that they'd like to.

      So really, the choice in some cities is:
      1) Pay for garbage service and use the garbage service
      2) Pay for garbage service and take your own trash to the dump, and pay to dispose of it there.

      I'm not certain how they get away with it from a legal standpoint, but they do (so far, at least).

    169. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Here's one specific requirement, by city code. (No, this isn't where I live, but I suspect similar things exist in many city codes, and I do see many much more vague "requirements" listed..)

      http://wauconda-il.gov/wp-cont...

      All new residents must contact Waste Management at 1-800-796-9696 to establish garbage pickup service, as required by excerpts of village ordinance referenced below.

    170. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then I through away

      No, you don't, you illiterate cunt. You may *think* so, but you'll find most people skim over your posts, considering them to be utter dreck.

      Don't forget to take a moment to hypocritically accuse someone else of poor grammar, that always gets a good laugh for the rest of us.

      Ignorant (and proud of it), arrogant North American cunt.

    171. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      putting food down the drain makes it more expensive to process the water.

      Putting YOU down the drain (and your vile spawn) would be worth EVERY FUCKING DOLLAR to process.

      "Just saying'.."

    172. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      In the general sense, this kind of regulation is nanny-state micromangement.

      I don't disagree, but that has nothing to do with my argument. They chose their particular waste management methods. They choose to enforce them. We might disagree with the law but it's not your law or mine.

    173. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by sandytaru · · Score: 1

      One hour for me. I want the outside to be crunchy.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    174. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by sandytaru · · Score: 1

      The salt actually modulates the bitterness if you use enough. If roasted for a longer time, the outside becomes very dry (like a kale chip) and disintegrates quickly.

      My mother's method of preparation involved boiling them for thirty minutes, and the resulting stench and bitter taste turned me off them for two decades.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    175. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by sandytaru · · Score: 1

      No, I only cut off any chunks of stem. I may occasionally remove the outer leaves if they are ratty looking. But I roast mine whole.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    176. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      What I don't understand is why you think the story about NBC editing the Zimmerman call was right wing fud?
      They did edit it in a way to make Zimmerman seem like he was a racist. Editing that call was wrong no matter what side you are on.
      Samzenpus posts lots of extreme anti nuclear stuff all the time as well. Maybe he just likes to troll both sides?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    177. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Well there you go. The boiling part is the problem as you found to your understandable distaste. About 10 minutes in shallow briskly boiling water should work better for you. No one likes green nasty sludge especially when you are told against all empirical evidence, that 'it's good for you'.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    178. Re:Another terrible article courtesy of samzenpus by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      Depends where you live in the country also. As an Oregonian, I consider slashdot more conservative than liberal.

      But there seems to be sizable amount of libertarians, which can confuse the casual reader sometime. They might strongly disbelieve AGW in one discussion, then strongly support the legalization of all drugs in another discussion.

      Libertarians can oftentimes be anti-religion, or at least tend atheistic in my opinion.

      However, I consider Libertarians "to the far right" of liberal. There may be some philosophical similarities between liberal/libertarian when it comes to 'freedom issues' like drugs, marriage, religion, etc.. but libertarians and liberals don't agree on what I consider to be fundamental societal power issues. Namely strong government vs weak government. Community vs individual.

  2. This has nothing to do with wasting food by damn_registrars · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why does the headline pretend that it does? Didn't the person who posted this bother to read the article before passing it through to the front page?

    And what does it have to do with technology?

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:This has nothing to do with wasting food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's clear the editor did not read the article in question. You can waste 100% of your food as long as you compost it. It always makes me laugh to see people drop pizza boxes in recycle bins.

    2. Re:This has nothing to do with wasting food by QuietLagoon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...And what does it have to do with technology?

      I've been noticing a trend in many of the articles that make it to the front page here. The trend is towards more inflammatory political-oriented articles that have little or only a marginal relation to technology.

      .
      Maybe after the failed site redesign, the new owners are trying to increase page hits by turning /. into a drudge-like site with lots of misleading headlines.

    3. Re:This has nothing to do with wasting food by halivar · · Score: 1

      The summary is pretty clear that this is about what goes in garbage cans, not compost.

    4. Re:This has nothing to do with wasting food by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      Maybe after the failed site redesign, the new owners are trying to increase page hits by turning /. into a drudge-like site with lots of misleading headlines.

      I don't think that's a "maybe"

      The choice of what crap makes it through the submission process is amazing at times.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    5. Re:This has nothing to do with wasting food by Charliemopps · · Score: 0

      Yes it does.
      Trash = waste
      Compost = not waste

      I think the OP's goal was to suggest this was over-reaching hippy nonsense. And it is certainly that.

      Unfortunately there are valid, very concerning environmental problems we need to address. But some people use environmentalism as an excuse for elitism and classicism. Notice their primary target are apartments. I suspect their next primary target will be fast food. Make no mistake, environmental laws like this target groups of people that are unpopular in places like Seattle.

    6. Re:This has nothing to do with wasting food by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      The article was pretty clear it was about compost. Maybe you should have read it.

    7. Re:This has nothing to do with wasting food by Prien715 · · Score: 1

      I'm happy when there's a good discussion of huge political issues here on /. -- I remember reading on 9/11/2001 and recently when we decided to bomb another country in the Middle East and enjoying the information and perspective this community brings. I would even argue having more of it is better. However, those are stories which are important and warrant attention from everyone -- regardless of which OS is your favorite (i.e. "Stuff that Matters"). It's good to hear from a self-moderated community rather than a bunch of suits claiming to be experts on cable TV.

      This summary is just self-serving political propaganda.

      --
      -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    8. Re:This has nothing to do with wasting food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the OP's goal was to suggest this was over-reaching hippy nonsense. And it is certainly that.

      No it isn't. You are perfectly free to do whatever the fuck you want with your garbage on your property. But if you want someone else to handle your garbage for you, you are going to have to abide by their rules.

    9. Re:This has nothing to do with wasting food by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      And what does it have to do with technology?

      Regardless of your take on how the editor wrote the headline, the concept here (the government empowering trash collectors to police your behavior after looking through what you throw out) is right there in keeping with the government doing all sorts of other things that involve prying into your behavior with an eye towards controlling it. Technology is the most common or at least a highly visible venue for that sort of intrusion these days, so other blatant examples of government micromanagement (like looking through your trash) serve nicely to remind technologists of the larger underlying issues, and that there ARE such issues.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    10. Re:This has nothing to do with wasting food by thaylin · · Score: 1

      The summary is, the headline is not.

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    11. Re:This has nothing to do with wasting food by scubamage · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I think it's because those of us who submit actual scientific/geeky/nerdy articles gave up trying to make decent headlines/summaries after the 100+th one failed to get greenlit. Folks start doing more and more to get something to get folks attention with their articles.

    12. Re:This has nothing to do with wasting food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The government is micromanaging anything here. It is managing the waste stream that IT is responsible for. Part of that management is making sure what enters the waste stream is only what should be there. Get over yourself.

    13. Re:This has nothing to do with wasting food by WrongMonkey · · Score: 0

      If you have a problem with the rules for trash collection, then you are free to opt out. But you can't eat your government services and have your libertarian cake, too.

    14. Re:This has nothing to do with wasting food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone should tell them that the redesign failed, because they're still trying to shove beta down new visitors' throats.

      The other day I made the mistake of logging on from a new device without using nobeta=1. I won't make that mistake again.

    15. Re:This has nothing to do with wasting food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In my town you are not free to opt out. Attempts to do so are met with the accusation that you are disposing of your garbage illegally.

    16. Re:This has nothing to do with wasting food by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      More controversy = more ad revenue. Dice doesn't care a whit what you think or how many mod points you have or what your karma has. You are a means to an end. The more controversy they feed you, the more likely you are to read or post and the more ads you are served.
      No different from TV "news". Misleading flamebait to get you to watch the 10 o'clock news where you find out their big story for the day was a hyped up non-event. But they got viewers and they get dollars for it.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    17. Re:This has nothing to do with wasting food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the life of me, I can't imagine why you laugh when you see people put pizza boxes into the recycling. You do know that they usually have taken the pizza out first, right? Unless it's Domino's, of course...

    18. Re:This has nothing to do with wasting food by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      other blatant examples of government micromanagement (like looking through your trash)

      Actually, as soon as the garbage men show up, it's the governemnt's trash. I don't see why they shouldn't be free to do whatever they want with their property.

      If you don't like the government's terms of service, you're always free to hire a private firm to come in an unmarked van and discreetly take away your food waste.

    19. Re:This has nothing to do with wasting food by operagost · · Score: 2

      What makes you think people with municipal trash collection don't have to use it? You 100% have to use it, or you don't get your trash collected and I'm pretty sure hoarding trash in your house is also illegal.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    20. Re:This has nothing to do with wasting food by operagost · · Score: 1

      No, you're not. Do you live in the woods? If you live in a town that has municipal trash collection, IT IS A MONOPOLY. Some communities contract a firm ostensibly to reduce traffic on roads, even.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    21. Re:This has nothing to do with wasting food by WrongMonkey · · Score: 1

      That's the dilemma of freedom, isn't it? You either pay for the service to pick up the trash and comply with the related rules or you figure out some other way to deal with your trash that doesn't infringe on your neighbors' right to live in a clean environment.

    22. Re:This has nothing to do with wasting food by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      Nobody can stop you from discreetly handing your bags of spoiled food over to a man who pulls up to your front door in an unmarked service vehicle.

    23. Re:This has nothing to do with wasting food by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure hoarding trash in your house is also illegal.

      Try convincing a hoarder of that. "No, no - I might need that some day!" "I paid good money for that!" "I'm collecting those pull-tabs!"

      Why one person needs 5 mixers (it was on special), 6 sets of dishes (all still in their original boxes), empty egg cartons stacked to the ceiling ....

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    24. Re:This has nothing to do with wasting food by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

      Actually, as soon as the garbage men show up, it's the governemnt's trash. I don't see why they shouldn't be free to do whatever they want with their property.

      If it's the government's trash, why are they threatening ME with a fine if THEIR trash has too much food waste in it?

      Seems to me that this new rule is heaven-sent for harassing the neighbor you don't like. Not like anyone can tell WHO put the food waste into a particular trash bin....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    25. Re:This has nothing to do with wasting food by nytes · · Score: 2

      It depends on where you live. Where I live, what's in the barrels belongs to the city the moment you put it at the curb. It's illegal to wander around picking out the choice recyclable stuff from the recycling bins. The city gets paid for that stuff.

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
    26. Re:This has nothing to do with wasting food by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      The question was why this is interesting to the slashdot audience. The answer is that this demographic is interested in how the government looks into and acts upon things that most people think of as not-really-public-stuff.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    27. Re:This has nothing to do with wasting food by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2

      Actually, as soon as the garbage men show up, it's the governemnt's trash. I don't see why they shouldn't be free to do whatever they want with their property.

      If it's the government's trash, why are they threatening ME with a fine if THEIR trash has too much food waste in it?

      Because you have an agreement with the government that they will take possession of some types of your undesirable property in exchange for fixed fee. Part of the agreement is that different types of undesirable materials have to be segregated in order to reduce overall costs, direct and external. You did not properly segregate the materials as specified under the agreement, and therefore pay a specified surcharge. Presumably, this surcharge helps the government offset the cost of having to build a new landfill earlier because the current one is filled up with your otherwise compostable food waste.

      Nobody is holding a gun to your head and forcing you to segreagate your waste according to the government's specifications. You're always free to load your garbage in your car, find a privately run landfill who will accept it as-is, and bring it there.

    28. Re:This has nothing to do with wasting food by Jmstuckman · · Score: 1

      Does anyone remember this one?

      http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

      Political articles on Slashdot aren't a new thing, although the site's political slant may be changing over time.

    29. Re:This has nothing to do with wasting food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're proof that they're not managing something is that they're managing it?

      For fuck's sake.

    30. Re:This has nothing to do with wasting food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been noticing a trend in many of the articles that make it to the front page here. The trend is towards more inflammatory political-oriented articles that have little or only a marginal relation to technology.

      Maybe after the failed site redesign, the new owners are trying to increase page hits by turning /. into a drudge-like site with lots of misleading headlines.

      Riling up the libertarians always is good for a ton of page hits and ad impressions.

    31. Re:This has nothing to do with wasting food by thunderclap · · Score: 1

      Actually, as soon as the garbage men show up, it's the governemnt's trash. I don't see why they shouldn't be free to do whatever they want with their property.

      If it's the government's trash, why are they threatening ME with a fine if THEIR trash has too much food waste in it?

      Nobody is holding a gun to your head and forcing you to segreagate your waste according to the government's specifications. You're always free to load your garbage in your car, find a privately run landfill who will accept it as-is, and bring it there.

      Oh but they are. What do you think that fine, no matter how small it is, is for? Its to force you to segreagate your waste according to the government's specifications because most don't have the time to drive to the 920-acre Cedar Hills Regional Landfill, located in Maple Valley, about 20 miles southeast of Seattle.
      Or the Roosevelt landfill, above the Columbia River Gorge.
      Or the Rabanco landfill in Klickitat County.

  3. Ooops ... sorry by OzPeter · · Score: 1, Troll

    I really thought that was *my* bin I was dumping all that waste food into.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:Ooops ... sorry by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And then immediately asking your city to take away for you, to a landfill, that they have to not only manage and use the space for, but be responsible for the environmentla stewardship of for decades afterwards.

      You buy and safely manage your own private dump, and then you can throw as much compost out as you want.

    2. Re: Ooops ... sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, it's /usr/bin. The ordinance is to encourage the separation of script trash from compilables.

    3. Re:Ooops ... sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's *your* bin, I guess we should dump the contents in *your* room, not in everybody's landfill.

    4. Re:Ooops ... sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you think that? All waste bins are provided by the City of Seattle.
      Go troll somewhere else.

    5. Re:Ooops ... sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you know... taxes. Maybe you have heard of it?

    6. Re:Ooops ... sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What cities remove the trash for you? It's private contractors. What cities acquire space and mange landfills? Again, private contractors. All the government does is act as the party that has all the answers, except for, you know, government being the largest polluter in the country. Yep. More government to make America great.

    7. Re:Ooops ... sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really thought that was *my* bin I was dumping all that waste food into.

      For the others that replied to this comment and misunderstood - OzPeter's point is that you can get your neighbors fined by dumping your food waste into their trash bins. His comment is the expected reply of a hypothetical person caught doing this. You know all those petty "bad neighbor" squabbles you hear about? Here's another tactic that could come into play. Fortunately, at only $1 per infraction, it's not going to break anyone's bank, but still.

      (AC to preserve mods)

    8. Re:Ooops ... sorry by Zynder · · Score: 1

      And who pays those private contractors? The city! And how do they get the money to pay them? Taxes! And who pays those? We do! EEEEERGO, we pay for trash disposal via taxes. Is that hard? Personally, I wouldn't mind just dumping everything in one can like I do now and hire some folks to work at the recycling plant to separate it. Ya know, cause we need jobs.

    9. Re:Ooops ... sorry by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      Personally, I wouldn't mind just dumping everything in one can like I do now and hire some folks to work at the recycling plant to separate it.

      Just try to separate those coffee grounds from the rest of the garbage. Good luck. How about doing your part to reduce landfill size and throw your trash in the correct bin provided by the city.

    10. Re:Ooops ... sorry by Zynder · · Score: 1

      Well, I do. In my town, everything goes in one can. I recycle my metals myself at the local scrap yard. They pay me instead of the city. I like that. I'd sell them my paper and plastic too, but the profit is so low for those, the places near me won't bother taking them. It's pretty much metal and circuit boards that they're after. Also, coffee grounds are simple enough. A motorized sieve would do fine.

    11. Re:Ooops ... sorry by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      Well, I do. In my town, everything goes in one can.

      Then your town does not recycle while Seattle does.

      A motorized sieve would do fine.

      A motorized sieve will not be effective when the ground are wet and stuck to garbage. It was also only an example of the difficulty in separating organics from inorganics. How would you separate the following?
      vegetable peals,
      fruit pits/cores,
      soups,
      egg shells,
      flowers,
      soiled paper,
      etc.

    12. Re:Ooops ... sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought the city's dump already with my taxes. What was your stupid point again?

    13. Re:Ooops ... sorry by Zynder · · Score: 1

      I know it was an example and I gave you a solution. I already know how they recycle stuff at my facility and they do indeed run everything through several differently sized sieves. You have to get the cans and the paper apart from all the little stuff like the coffee grounds. And sure it won't be perfect but it is evidently good enough for them. My solution for all of those things in your list is to burn them to run power generators. We can scrub the hell out of the exhaust stream until we have practically nothing but water vapor and CO2 (we already do this in coal plants, automobiles, etc). The sludge scrubbed can then be dealt with and by volume it will take up less space so your landfills don't overflow (if burying it is appropriate). And my town does recycle, we just don't do it to your level and I suspect that is the real issue. We pay people at the dump to go through our trash and do whatever they should with it. What happens to it after that isn't my concern. I'm paying them to do a job so I expect them to render service (but like I said in my other post to you, I don't COUNT on them rendering it because people are lazy). They can figure out how to do their jobs themselves.

    14. Re:Ooops ... sorry by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      Sieved sort by size and not material. a sieve can not tell the difference between an apple and a plastic ball. I think you might want to take a closer look at what is actually being sorted in your town. Anything finer takes people and space. Sorting the thousands of tons of waste that comes out of a large city like Seattle is very different than doing it for your small town.

      And sure it won't be perfect but it is evidently good enough for them.

      It is only useful for separating non-organic recyclables from trash. It is useless for separating organic recyclables from trash.

      We can scrub the hell out of the exhaust stream until we have practically nothing but water vapor and CO2

      I do not believe trading one problem, landfill capacity, with another problem, CO2 emissions, is a good idea.

  4. This is Seattle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Coffee grinds alone probably make up 10%

    1. Re:This is Seattle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coffee grinds alone probably make up 10%

      Semen makes up another 10%

    2. Re:This is Seattle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coffee grinds alone probably make up 10%

      Semen makes up another 10%

      No, that's San Francisco! Heyyoo!

  5. Wow.... by grumpyman · · Score: 0

    Cost of inspection: $100; violator: 1 out of 10; penalty collected $1; smell, mess and the process: priceless.

    1. Re:Wow.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the article. There are no inspectors; they are authorizing the garbage collectors to look at the garbage as they are picking it up.
      From the article, "Under the new rules, collectors can take a cursory look each time they dump trash into a garbage truck."

  6. Fascism at its finest! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What next...they dictate how much soap you use when you shower? Where will they stop? Could they limit sex in Seattle...I mean sex uses energy...and it *might* be wasting energy...which is food, therefore...in order to prevent the wasting of food...sex is outlawed!

    1. Re:Fascism at its finest! by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      Too bad that's not what's happening. Maybe you should have read the article.

    2. Re:Fascism at its finest! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you need a course in reading comprehension! They are dictating where trash goes. In this case the "excess food" is the trash. Isn't this little more than slavery? Isn't this forced labor? How much money does each person who throws something away in Seattle receive...oh, they aren't paid to do it...oh...worse...they have to pay to have garbage removed...oh, wait...worse...they can be fined if they "don't throw garbage away correctly"

      I stand by what I wrote: Fascism at its finest!

    3. Re:Fascism at its finest! by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      Well, probably not how much soap you use, but they very well may limit what chemicals are allowed to be in soap that the vendors sell. They've already banned phosphorous in dishwashing detergent.

    4. Re:Fascism at its finest! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You keep yapping about these things, and that rationed soap will be made out of you.

      - a fascist Seattleite.

  7. Dumb idea by benjfowler · · Score: 1

    If people end up with too much food waste; they'll find other ways of disposing of it. Like fly-tipping it.

    1. Re:Dumb idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, if you don't make people behave properly, then they'll not give a crap what they do with their trash as long as it's not their problem.

    2. Re:Dumb idea by cdrudge · · Score: 0

      I was thinking something similar, although not just dumping it elsewhere illegally. Don't want me to throw out my compostables? Fine. I'll grind them in my garbage disposal and wash them down my drain.

      I can't imagine that food wastes comprise that large of a percentage of residential waste that such fines are necessary, but maybe I'm wrong. For a restaurant/food service establishment, yeah, the numbers are going to be different.

    3. Re:Dumb idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It makes more sense when you understand that Seattle already has curbside composting collection. That is, in addition to the trash bin and recycle bin, there's also a compost bin, which gets taken to a commercial composting site.

      The fine being passed for is for putting compostable materials in the trash bin, rather than in the compost bin. So "find other ways of disposing of it" means walking two feet further and putting it in the brown bin rather than the black bin.

      The Slashdot headline is pure junk - it's nothing about "wasting food", it's purely about putting food waste in the correct bin. As I understand it, you're still free to buy way too much food and throw it directly in the trash - you just have to trash it in the compost bin instead of the regular trash bin.

    4. Re:Dumb idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just install a damn garbage disposal in your sink, they've been pretty much standard in most homes I've been in. The only people who didn't have them were those on septic systems and a few real old apartment buildings. What are they illegal in Seattle or something?

    5. Re:Dumb idea by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      You're missing the reality of the situation. They already have a place to dump it; pretty much anywhere you go in Seattle there are *three* (not two like in Los Angeles) different "trash" bins. One is for recycleables, one is for compostable waste, and one is for non-recycleable, non-compostable waste. This isn't about making it illegal for people to get rid of too much uneaten food, its just about creating a law to make using the right bin for it enforceable. They already did it for the recycleables almost a decade ago.

    6. Re:Dumb idea by geekoid · · Score: 1

      " Fine. I'll grind them in my garbage disposal and wash them down my drain."
      well, don't complain when your sewer bill gets more expensive.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:Dumb idea by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      How about you dispose of in the compostables bin provided for free by the city? You can put as much food in that bin as you want.

    8. Re:Dumb idea by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      I'll grind them in my garbage disposal and wash them down my drain.

      Seattle provides separate bins for compostables. The problem is that many people are just not using them and still putting compostables in the regular trash.

      I can't imagine that food wastes comprise that large of a percentage of residential waste

      According to this compostables are 30% of what is still in the garbage. Compostables in landfills also produce methane which is a greenhouse gas.

  8. Seattle's reminder to tip your garbage-worker well by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    it works where i work.

  9. Seriously?! by sarguin · · Score: 0

    Next step : check if people use to much toilet paper by analyzing every toilet flush content.

  10. In related news ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... sales of commercial-grade garbage disposal units are rising.

    I suppose the Seattle garbage Nazis will pay people to inspect what flows out of my sewer pipe next.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:In related news ... by swb · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised they haven't banned garbage disposals. Pretty much all our food waste with the exception of meat bones goes into the disposal.

      Here in Minneapolis we used to have pre-sort recycling where you had to separate out all the recyclables by type. In the past year they went to single sort and participation soared. I'm kind of curious if anyone's studied the impact of flawed but high participation rate recycling versus more perfect but low participation rate recycling.

    2. Re:In related news ... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      In my case, more gets recycled. We used to have quite a few categories, each of which required separate storage, so we usually only bothered with glass, aluminum, newspapers, and cardboard, and we were scrounging around for paper bags. Now that we don't have to keep separate collections for two weeks, and bag everything separately, much more goes into the recycling bin.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    3. Re:In related news ... by swb · · Score: 1

      This has been the reported outcome where I live and has been our experience, too.

      I found the pre-sort recycling experience exasperating because it meant either a huge collection of crap in the kitchen (paper sacks for cans, plastic, newspapers, glass) if we sorted as we went or a tedious and kind of gross sort operation on the day we hauled it out to the curb.

      What it boiled down to was just not bothering with any of it most of the time, with the exception of newsprint which was too bulky to put in the trash. Now we recycle so much that the bin outside is usually close to overflowing on pickup day and the only slightly smaller garbage bin often is only a third to half full. My wife thinks they should pickup recycling every week (trash is weekly, recycling every other week).

      The pre-sort advocates claim, though, that not pre-sorting results in a lower yield of usable recycling, but how much I don't know. I'm curious if the single-sort volume and participation is so much better that the yield numbers don't matter.

      I'm also curious how much actually gets recycled. A client who works for a company that runs an older garbage-to-fuel processing plant claims that recycling of non-aluminum is kind of a sham, that much of it ends up in landfills anyway because of low demand.

  11. Carrot, not stick by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    The carrot instead of the stick of the law should be tried first: offer rewards for reporting rather than spankings for not. Laws like this just clog up police departments and courts, and probably increase insurance rates for trash collection companies.

    1. Re:Carrot, not stick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Literally.

      Carrots are not OK, but sticks are.

    2. Re:Carrot, not stick by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      And yet if you read the article it doesn't. The same thing was applied to recyclables. People disposed of their recyclables properly and weren't fined. Too bad it doesn't help your narrative.

    3. Re:Carrot, not stick by geekoid · · Score: 1

      ": offer rewards for reporting rather "
      You mean if I stuff my garbage into your bins and then report you I get money?

      Anyways, read the article., your post makes you look like an idiot.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Carrot, not stick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's better for him to simply look like an idiot instead of actually being one like yourself.

  12. It's sad how red communists took over so fast... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BTW I was living under so called communism many years and I had actually more freedom than today. Regulations were not strictly followed... This is staggering...

  13. Re:It's sad how red communists took over so fast.. by praxis · · Score: 1

    How many communists voted for this ordinance?

  14. Yay more profit for Waste Connections by gatfirls · · Score: 1

    Maybe they could streamline the whole process and have members of the public be required to serve on sorting duty at the dumps, kind of like jury duty. I mean it's for the environment so who cares that it's at the behest of a for profit company?

  15. Fuck the people by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1

    From the article:

    "The council vote to pass the new composting measure was a unanimous 9-to-0. No public hearing was required."

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    1. Re:Fuck the people by Kijori · · Score: 1

      You can't have a public hearing about every regulation proposed by Government, it would be a huge waste of time and money. There has to be some sort of minimum threshold - and surely a $1 fine designed to raise awareness of sorting your garbage falls on the "not worth a consultation" side?

      In other words, do you actually think the council should have run a public consultation about this, or did you just see an opportunity to spout a "Government is bad!" soundbite?

  16. Re:It's sad how red communists took over so fast.. by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1

    How many communists voted for this ordinance?

    From the article:

    "The council vote to pass the new composting measure was a unanimous 9-to-0. No public hearing was required."

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
  17. $1 seems really stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you disagree with the city, you can just take it to court each time. Even the court fees (if they bill them there, they don't where I am) don't cover the city's cost of employing the prosecutor to collect that $1. I expect someone who dislikes this rule to purposely collect a couple hundred dollars in fines and take a week off work to defend them all.

  18. Better than Bloomberg. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    He kept passing laws to stop New Yorkers from eating food, (with a more fluid definitions of "food" and "eat" of course. :-)

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  19. A little class with your trash. by duckintheface · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I was in Seattle recently. The guys who pick up the compostable garbage were driving around listening to classical music.... turned up loud so you could hear it over the sound of the truck engine. Not your typical garbage collectors.

    Yes, the headline is a pathetic attempt to ring the bell for the conservative Pavlovian dogs to make them salivate all over slashdot. The implication of the headline is that it is about people wasting edible food by throwing it in the trash. Actually it is about compostables (food or otherwise) being placed in the trash steam headed to the landfill rather than the composting station.

    --
    "He took a duck in the face at 250 knots." -- William Gibson, Pattern Recognition
  20. MOD UP MORE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Mod this up more. The other night I just about swore off Slashdot when I saw some idiot political clickbait. Something to do with justifying old fucks hating of Japanese. This place has jumped the shark, it's more of a comedy site than a tech news site.. and it does a poor job at either.

    1. Re:MOD UP MORE by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Old fucks fought a WAR against the Japanese. I would give them a pass for retaining some of the obvious and foreseeable animosity that would have come from that. I would cut Japanese geezers the same slack.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:MOD UP MORE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      News for nerds? Nope. Stuff that matters? Nope. Clickbait adsales? YOU BETCHA

      How much did you pay for your low UID by the way? It's interesting to see how many are for sale.

  21. Weight or volume? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

    So, is the 10% limit by weight or volume?

    And how are the trash collectors supposed to determine whether it's 9% or 11%?

    Oh, and are they going to be opening plastic garbage bags to check the contents? Or are plastic garbage bags already illegal in Seattle?

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    1. Re:Weight or volume? by coldsalmon · · Score: 1

      By the time the bag of garbage is offered as evidence in court, the compostable portion will likely have shrunk to below 10% by volume.

    2. Re:Weight or volume? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In reality, the garbage collector will notice that you NEVER use the organic bin, open your trash bin and cut the bags to take a picture, and write you a ticket.

      Since the picture will show that your trash is 50% organic by volume, the rest of your complaining is irrelevant.

    3. Re:Weight or volume? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good chance it'll have shrunk below 10% by weight as well. And yes, I know physics.

  22. Re:Why a .357 magnum is useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good use for anyone that is involved in this.

    Then you might want to start by using it on yourself. Because you are involved in this. You became involved when you said "I don't like keeping all this crap on my property. I think I'll pay someone else to take it away for me".

  23. Legit Effort by retroworks · · Score: 2

    I'm a pretty big critic of fellow environmentalists who get carried away with authority, sometimes actually doing environmental harm in the pursuit of theory (e.g. ROHS, removal of recycled content lead from circuit boards, replaced with tin mined from Indonesian coral islands, oy vey. Like replacing plastic with "organic, natural" baby seal pelts).

    However, in defense of the enviros and the article posted on /., organic waste really is a pretty cutting edge activity. A century ago pig farmers actually collected significant amounts of food waste, and until very recently the Egyptian Zabaleen community (Coptic Christians) ran a hugely successful organic waste collection system in Cairo. It was a fairly recent innovation to put recyclables and organics and junk into "landfills" and incinerators. It's legitimate to study public policy and efforts to achieve more sustainable cities.

    When I was in charge of a state recycling program in the 90s (MA DEP), however, I found that rewarding positive behavior got better publicity than "fines" for not recycling. We ran a "recycling lottery" in Somerville where they'd choose a household at random and if they had their recyclables out, they got $200. It generated the awareness the Seattle fine is trying to achieve without the Drudge-Report-iness. It's also easier to backtrack if the whole thing turns out to be a mistake, if you've given out prizes for affirmative behavior instead of fines.

    --
    Gently reply
    1. Re:Legit Effort by scubamage · · Score: 1

      Fun fact, all MGM owned casinos in Las Vegas donate 100% of their food scraps to a local pig farmer, who in turn has very fat healthy pigs. Those pigs are then sold at a great discount to MGM owned casinos in Las Vegas. It's a fantastic system.

  24. View from the Suburbs by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

    I always find it kind of weird that people who live in cities expect the government to collect the trash to begin with.

    1. Re:View from the Suburbs by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      They pay them money to do that

    2. Re:View from the Suburbs by PPH · · Score: 1

      Living out in the suburbs, in an area recently annexed by a local town, collection became mandatory. I was happy with hauling it myself, which I have done for decades. But when organized crime^H^H^Hcommercial collection services told the city they could tack a utility tax onto the fee, they were all in.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:View from the Suburbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fringe suburb here, adjacent to truly rural areas. There is a monopoly collection, but I believe I may not be required to sign up for it. The monopoly part makes sense because you don't want multiple trucking companies tearing up the already terrible hilly roads here. Half my street is dirt with a pinch of gravel in it. Fortunately I live on the paved part.

      When I moved in, there was an old 55 gallon drum here, all rusted out. I was really worried about what might have been dumped here, until somebody told me it was just an old "burn barrel". Seems that until about 10 years ago, people just burned their shit in these metal drums. That's illegal now.

      Out a bit from here, there are people not even served by the commercial haulers. Ever wonder why some trailers on rural lots turn into little landfills? That's why.

    4. Re:View from the Suburbs by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      not very fuel efficient or emissions conserving though for everyone to be driving to dump vs. diesel garbage truck. And there is the question of how much is your time worth, were you spending couple hours a week making trips?

    5. Re:View from the Suburbs by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Which is what makes it so weird. Since you end up paying for it anyways, why not just contract with a commercial trash hauler directly rather than paying a huge administrative overhead for a bunch of municipal employees to do it?

    6. Re:View from the Suburbs by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      I've lived in places with the worst of both worlds, the city makes the contract with Waste Management Inc, and then turns around and has residents pay a tax part of which goes to that contractor and the rest to the city treasury

    7. Re:View from the Suburbs by geekoid · · Score: 1

      becasue it would be far more expensive.
      I have no idea why you think private companies don't have a high overhead.
      In fact, it's usually higher then government overhead.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:View from the Suburbs by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the city generally isn't collecting the trash itself. It's just bidding it out to a contractor anyways (e.g. Seattle contracts with Waste Managent and Cleanscapes), so you get all the contractor overhead anyways, plus the government overhead on top of it.

    9. Re:View from the Suburbs by PPH · · Score: 1

      I took the non-perishable garbage in about once a month with some other debris that I have to haul anyway. So my household garbage was 'free'.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    10. Re:View from the Suburbs by Zynder · · Score: 1

      Because I'm a fat, lazy Amnerican. Is that what you've been waiting for someone to say? I just want to throw my garbage away. I don't want to shop around for the best rates, highest customer service, or whatever other BS thing I do when I shop for something. I just to throw my shit in the yard (figuratively of course) and then it magically disappears by Monday morning. I only pay $12/mo with the city. Who's going to compete with that anyway?

    11. Re:View from the Suburbs by Kijori · · Score: 1

      Why? Surely it's more efficient for one central organisation to collect everyone's trash than for everyone to do it separately? (As someone who has always had the local council pick up his trash, I'm genuinely curious)

  25. Re:It's sad how red communists took over so fast.. by praxis · · Score: 1

    How many communists voted for this ordinance?

    From the article:

    "The council vote to pass the new composting measure was a unanimous 9-to-0. No public hearing was required."

    That does not address party membership of the voters.

  26. Waste of time go single stream by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

    Single stream is more efficient. Dump most stuff and split it up at the far end.

    --
    No sir I dont like it.
    1. Re:Waste of time go single stream by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      You try separating coffee grounds and potato peals from general garbage. Good luck.

      Single stream leaves recyclables soiled by compostables and therefore non-recyclble. Otherwise you use massive amounts of water to wash the recyclables and lose the compostables in the process. Paper that has been soiled by compostables can not be recycled as paper products.

      Stop being lazy and put the compostables in the separate bin provided for free by the city.

  27. Re:It's sad how red communists took over so fast.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, none, but one Socialist did.

  28. A hearty meh. by scubamage · · Score: 1

    I already compost all of my food waste, most of which goes into my garden. What little there is, anyway. I spent too many years nearly starving, so usually when we cook (which is about 98% of what we eat) it goes through 3 cycles of leftover re-hashes until it's all gone. What can't be used immediately gets frozen and used later. My wife and I live on 60$ a week for groceries, which includes all toiletries, paper products, and cleaning goods. Learn to compost and make use of your food intelligently and responsibly - life is cheaper, and better for the environment. And a proposal like this one will do exactly nothing to your life.

  29. sad to see businesses can still buy exemptions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    businesses aren’t subject to any composting requirements.

    1. Re:sad to see businesses can still buy exemptions by mark-t · · Score: 2
      *CURRENTLY*.... under the new legislation, they would be subject to them.

      ... businesses will be subject to the same 10 percent threshold but will get two warnings before they are fined. A third violation will result in a $50 fine

    2. Re:sad to see businesses can still buy exemptions by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      The two warnings is the current law. Under the new law there is no provision for warnings;

      C. Required Recycling of Food Waste and Compostable Paper.

      1. As of January 1, 2015, all commercial establishments, including those hauling their own waste, shall separate food waste and compostable paper for recycling, and no food waste or compostable paper shall be deposited in garbage containers or drop boxes or disposed as garbage at the City's transfer stations. All commercial establishments that generate food waste or compostable paper shall subscribe to a composting service, process their food waste onsite or self-haul their food waste for processing. All building owners shall provide composting service for their tenants or provide space for tenants' own food waste containers. The Director of Seattle Public Utilities is authorized to promulgate rules, in accordance with the provisions of the Administrative Code, SMC Chapter 3.02, for purposes of interpreting and clarifying the requirements of this subsection.

      2. Enforcement.

      a. As of October 1, 2014, the Director of Seattle Public Utilities shall begin a program of customer outreach and assistance regarding these new recycling requirements.

      b. As of January 1, 2015, the Director of Seattle Public Utilities shall monitor commercial containers and provide educational notices or tags for containers with significant amounts food waste and compostable paper.

      c. As of July 1, 2015, any violation of this section shall result in an additional collection fee of $50 per collection.

      That is the entire section pertaining to commercial establishments. I see no mention of warnings.

  30. How do they judge this? by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    Food can sit in a garbage can for a week before they come by.

    How do they tell the difference between wasted food and food that was thrown out because it was spoiled and unsafe to eat to start with?

  31. fat mother fuckers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article is spot on and it's from SeattleTimes not from some blogger. For Example, NYC garbage get's shipped to other States which costs the city $1+billion a year, no where to put all that garbage, well some still ends up in the bronx. Yup, people eat like fucking pigs in this country producing so much waste especially from leftovers just sitting in the refrigerators until it's ready to be thrown out. People really need to live below their fucking means if we are to get rid of this trash problem. But I suspect the majority of garbage comes from processed foods(plastics, bottles, wrappers, etc...) made by nestle and pepsi to name a few. I live on salads, soups, home made French fries, and 2 times every 2 month's meat. But, 1 - 2 meals a day, not starving.

  32. 100s of train cars, every day by thatseattleguy · · Score: 5, Informative

    A vital detail that those outside the city (and many within it) don't know - and of course won't get from the inflammatory OMG! NANNY STATE! headline/summary - is that the City of Seattle doesn't have a local landfill. Hasn't for many years; there's no nearby space. Instead, all garbage is loaded onto train cars - hundreds of them a day - and sent by rail to a landfill in rural Oregon, about 250 miles away. That was the cheapest alternative for the city, even though it involves paying twice (once to transport it, and again to the landfill operator). But it's still expensive.
    .
    Given that it's in the best interest of the City _and_ its ratepayers to reduce the amount of landfillable waste (aka number of train cars) in favor of more economic alternatives; specifically, recycling and composting, both of which are able to be handled within a few dozen miles of the city, at much lower cost than the landfill trains. The alternative is to have even more and longer trains and higher rates for garbage for everyone.
    .
    Kind of the opposite of a nanny state; this is pure and simple economics. If the spectre of a few $1 fines for the few residents who can't be bothered to separate their greasy pizza boxes into another bin makes everyone's garbage rates lower, then I'm all for it.

    1. Re:100s of train cars, every day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up - all true. Although actually the landfill is more like 320 miles away from Seattle:

       

      http://wmnorthwest.com/landfill/columbiaridge.htm

    2. Re:100s of train cars, every day by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      The alternative is to have even more and longer trains and higher rates for garbage for everyone.

      Or switch from flat rates to proportional. Why should poor people who generate little waste subsidize waste disposal for wealthy people?

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    3. Re:100s of train cars, every day by WrongMonkey · · Score: 1
      In the city of Seattle, there are five different tiers of residential trash collection service and three tiers of food and yard waste service available. Recyclable goods are collected for free. Is that proportional enough for you?

      http://www.seattle.gov/Util/My...

    4. Re:100s of train cars, every day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So maybe you should just charge users by volume and then let the market work it's magic? No need for laws and regulations to solve something that can solve itself.

    5. Re:100s of train cars, every day by Gavagai80 · · Score: 2

      Right... 5 seconds after you start charging people by volume of trash, they start sneaking their trash into other people's bins and/or street and yards.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    6. Re:100s of train cars, every day by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Why should poor people who generate little waste subsidize waste disposal for wealthy people?"
      I'm not sure why you think that's true.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:100s of train cars, every day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All correct (except that all recyclables are currently free - no fees of any kind). You can choose to pay for one of five different garbage can sizes, from a micro-box (about the size of a largish microwave oven) all the way up to a 96-gallon rolling cart. All picked up weekly (as is the compost).

      It's about the most proportional rate structure I've seen in any city - and I've see a lot of them.

    8. Re:100s of train cars, every day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats only the stuff going to landfills. The compost goes to 2 facilities, one south of the city, one north. Neither one within miles of the pristine city citizens. Both of the compost facilities have been the target of years, years of complaints and lawsuits about the smells emanating from them. The company has failed to install required machinery and has been a horrible neighbor for everyone. Now they want to send more, yay!

    9. Re:100s of train cars, every day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure why you think it's not.

    10. Re:100s of train cars, every day by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Since the lowest level here is pretty cheap, I haven't noticed people trying to dispose of their trash in other people's bins. When we lived in a city where we were supposed to pay for our own garbage disposal, I did notice people cheating like that. (The disposal was also more expensive, and we constantly had garbage trucks going down the street.)

      I think the critical factor here is that everybody pays something for garbage disposal, so you don't have to deal with private companies directly (they can bid for the city business).

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    11. Re:100s of train cars, every day by thunderclap · · Score: 1

      A vital detail that those outside the city (and many within it) don't know - and of course won't get from the inflammatory OMG! NANNY STATE! headline/summary - is that the City of Seattle doesn't have a local landfill. Hasn't for many years; there's no nearby space. Instead, all garbage is loaded onto train cars - hundreds of them a day - and sent by rail to a landfill in rural Oregon, about 250 miles away. That was the cheapest alternative for the city, even though it involves paying twice (once to transport it, and again to the landfill operator). But it's still expensive. Given that it's in the best interest of the City _and_ its ratepayers to reduce the amount of landfillable waste (aka number of train cars) in favor of more economic alternatives; specifically, recycling and composting, both of which are able to be handled within a few dozen miles of the city, at much lower cost than the landfill trains. The alternative is to have even more and longer trains and higher rates for garbage for everyone. Kind of the opposite of a nanny state; this is pure and simple economics. If the spectre of a few $1 fines for the few residents who can't be bothered to separate their greasy pizza boxes into another bin makes everyone's garbage rates lower, then I'm all for it.

      Thats BS. Seattle has no landfill because it doesn't want one. Not because there is no space. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seattle_City_Light
      http://faculty.georgetown.edu/...
      http://www.economist.com/node/...
      (from 2007) http://seattletimes.com/.../20...
      (2012) http://your.kingcounty.gov/sol...
      OP is referencing this: http://www.seattle.gov/finance...
      That's the problem: wastefull goverment mismanagement when they could make a deal with those nearby.

    12. Re:100s of train cars, every day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has already happened to me. It's not a huge problem but it happens and we only get charged $1 per bag that doesn't fit in our bins. That's just the contract my neighborhood has with the waste company.

      I discovered it one night when I went to put another bag into my own trash bin only to discover it was full with someone else's garbage. I was tempted to leave it in the middle of the alley, but that would just be trashing my own neighborhood so I took my best guess as to which neighbor did it and put the foreign garbage in someone else's bin.

      I hope I guessed right and I hope they got fined the dollar - which is more a pain in the ass than an expense because the waste contract is paid for by HOA fees so it's a bill I never directly have to pay.

  33. But wait, there's more... by chinton · · Score: 1, Informative

    That isn't even the dumbest thing Seattle did this week.

  34. RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RTFA, all shall be revealed

  35. This is a joke, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No way has the USA turned in to a fascist easter state since last I was there!

  36. Withhold Payment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I am paying them to pick up my garbage, it's going to be MY terms. I'll just stop payment and let the trash build up.

    1. Re:Withhold Payment by mark-t · · Score: 1

      They'll still pick it up, but then you'll just be fined. If you don't pay the fine, you could end up getting yourself arrested.

      If you don't like it, don't live in a city.

  37. Re:It's sad how red communists took over so fast.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That does not address party membership of the voters.

    We're talking about Seattle's City Council, so: all Democrats except for one Socialist.

  38. Victoria BC is doing this too.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Day after it went into effect I installed an industrial garbage grinder, Now everything goes down the sewer and into the ocean. Food, compostable, newspapers, bottles,cans, everything.

    You can encourage me to do something and i'll probably go along with it. Force me to do something, i will resist with every atom of my being.

  39. Re:Unconstitutional at best. by bmk67 · · Score: 1

    Another idiot who didn't read TFA or TFS. Par for the course, this is Slashdot after all.

  40. Seattle passes penalties for misplacing garbage by iamacat · · Score: 1

    Horrible story title. Actually, you can waste food all you want, but you have to place it in compost bin. I still think it's a dumb law. Landfill disposal rates should be set high enough to compensate for city costs and adverse environmental impact. People would then have incentive to reduce non-recyclable waste in all kind of ways, not just by sorting.

    1. Re:Seattle passes penalties for misplacing garbage by TwoEyedJack · · Score: 1

      What entity gets the proceeds from "adverse environmental impact"? That entity will be prone to declare more and more activities to fall into this category and do nothing to mitigate any environmental impacts. Never forget that the essential mission of any government entity is to gain more and more power (money).

    2. Re:Seattle passes penalties for misplacing garbage by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Landfill needs to be done on a federal level. Local counties and city's have failed.
      We could dig a holes large enough to put all the trash we will use for the next 200 years and it won't even be half full.

      The issue is land and organization, and counties are always pissing all over each other.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Seattle passes penalties for misplacing garbage by iamacat · · Score: 1

      Every citizen equally, of course, as environment is a public resource. People will then have incentive to get the income but minimize their own footprint.

    4. Re:Seattle passes penalties for misplacing garbage by TwoEyedJack · · Score: 1

      When did you ever see a tax/fine proposal that included distribution to citizens?

    5. Re:Seattle passes penalties for misplacing garbage by iamacat · · Score: 1

      Roads, fire/police department, public parks, libraries... It would be very useful to give everyone some amount of cash so that they are able to take care of themselves and then reward beneficial activities and tax problematic ones. But in the context of a city, traditional use for publicly beneficial projects is quite straightforward.

    6. Re:Seattle passes penalties for misplacing garbage by TwoEyedJack · · Score: 1

      A pox on whoever first decided that tax laws should be used to manipulate the behavior of free citizens. Where do you suppose government gets this cash to distribute? Who gets to decide what activities are "beneficial" or "problematic"? If people are so dumb that they cannot make their own choices, what makes you think politicians are any smarter? I would argue that the evidence clearly points to politicians not being the Utopian philosopher-kings,but self-serving kleptocrats.

  41. People not sorting trash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still have no idea why so many people have problems with sorting trash.
    It is such a stupidly simple thing. Not to mention passive.

    Paper? Put it with paper. Glass, in glass, metals, metal, etc.
    So SO hard, my arms broke just thinking of doing such amazingly complex things.
    I bet these people find it hard to rip paper containers in half to store them better in the trash as well. I bet these awful people put entire empty boxes in the trash, taking up so much space just with AIR.

    Sickening how lazy people can be these days.
    I can make a meal, clean any preparation and put things in the trash correctly all at the same time more or less.
    It isn't exactly rocket surgery.

  42. non issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    seattle legalized meth this week too... so what.

  43. These are the same idiots by TwoEyedJack · · Score: 1

    who banned driftwood bonfires to combat global warming.

    1. Re:These are the same idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      false.
      Try again, moron.

  44. Negative Idea by JimSadler · · Score: 1

    I suspect that people will litter or put items in a neighbors trash to avoid penalties. For example if you get a sack of spoiled potatoes and fear a fine would you put them in your trash? Maybe a hole in the back yard or a toss in the local pond will happen. Some laws cause more grief than relief.

    1. Re:Negative Idea by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      You miss the point that Seattle residents are supplied with a separate bin for the collection of compostable material. All the ordinance does is incentivise putting the biological material in the correct bin. The problem is that some people are still putting compostables in the incorrect bin.

      I suspect that people will litter or put items in a neighbors trash to avoid penalties.

      It is much easier to put it in the bin next to the trash bin that go through all that trouble.

    2. Re:Negative Idea by Zynder · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I'm not opening that plastic bag full of sludge to separate it. I'll totally pay the fine. What people aren't realizing here is that for $4/mo you can just dump everything into ONE can! I'm cool with that!

    3. Re:Negative Idea by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I'm not opening that plastic bag full of sludge to separate it.

      How about instead of putting everything in one can and separating it later you put it in 3 container, one for garbage, one for compost and one for recyclable, in the first place .

    4. Re:Negative Idea by Zynder · · Score: 1

      Because I'm not keeping 3 cans by my desk. And I'm not making 3 trips to the curb to dump them. And I'm not doing this for every room of my home where I keep a can. You forgot, I'm terribly lazy. I would rather pay someone else, who needs a job worse than I do, to separate it at the recycling facility. Also, your 3 can method wouldn't matter anyway in that particular example. Where I buy potatoes, they come on plastic bags. I never remove them from said bag until it's time to cook them. Often that is so long that they liquefy hence why I said I'm not opening that bag of sludge. The plastic bag can't go in the compost bin so it'll just get dumped wherever I find it. You may have thought I meant opening the actual trash bag. We didn't even get that far!

    5. Re:Negative Idea by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      I would rather pay someone else, who needs a job worse than I do, to separate it at the recycling facility.

      Separation of organic material from garbage after they have been mixed together and compressed is next to impossible. Your "solution" is not a solution.

      The plastic bag can't go in the compost bin so it'll just get dumped wherever I find it.

      So you are tool lazy to tear a hole in the bag, dump it in the compost can and throw the bag in the garbage can.

      You forgot, I'm terribly lazy.

      So you are too lazy to decrease the landfill issue. We can blame you and people like you when we run out of landfill space.

    6. Re:Negative Idea by Zynder · · Score: 1

      I never claimed to be part of the solution. Thing is, I'm not alone. This is often why recycling programs fail. There are so many of us who do the bare minimum necessary to get by that you have to adjust your planning to accommodate us. There's simply no way around it. If you expect us to just do the whatever it is you want, then you'll be sadly disappointed. The reward for ones efforts regarding recycling are never seen immediately. So if you're the type of person who is already barely giving a shit, and someone shows up with a page of "requirements" along with a ticket, then you went over the threshold of effort vs reward. No matter how many cuddly marmots my recycling saves in East Kansas, if you're in my face in my front yard bitching at me, I quickly realize there are no marmots in Tennessee and all my attempts at saving them are bringing me nothing but grief. So I say fuck those marmots, get out of my yard, and you'll be lucky if I just don't go dump it all in the woods or start a nice smoky black fire. It's not what I WANT to do, mind you, but you're annoying the shit out of me with your rules and I've already got a full day, I'm running late, and I'd rather be banging the hot blonde in my office instead of worrying about marmots.

      Did you catch the part where I said that I already recycle my metals? Why? Because that is an incentive. That is money going into my pocket. Your fines are a disincentive, that is money flowing OUT of my pocket (which I hate). Not only that, but it comes off as you being a sanctimonious prick (not you in particular). It's like you get to be big daddy and run around spanking all of us naughty kids and most folks don't like that. If you bribe us however, we think we're getting away with something someone else isn't and our primate-derived brains eat that shit up by the boat load.

      So to sum things up, I'm not actually a rabid tree hugger hater. I do what I can to keep my town cleaned up provided it doesn't end up becoming a job. I already have 2 of those. I'd certainly expect to have the law come down on me if I were dumping barrels of waste or burning a 10ft tall tire pyramid in the back yard. It's bad when everyone is doing things like that, no doubt about it. But again, people in general are lazy (though I outdo most!), so don't make things too difficult and we won't fight back. I could take you to an absolutely gorgeous mountain view right outside of town here and you would be amazed...until you looked down. That is the tire bluff because there is no place you can take a tire to dispose of for free (well if you present a food stamp card it's free). Even straight to the landfill they still charge $5/tire. So people who are cheap asses or those who love to stick it to the man just throw them off the side of the bluff. That's the kind of problems recycling proponents have to overcome.

    7. Re:Negative Idea by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      You don't seem to understand the issue. It is not about marmots it is about finding room to put your trash. By taking compostables out of the waste stream that goes to landfills the landfills will fill up much slower. You will be saying a different tune when your garbage fees skyrocket because they have to haul your mixed garbage even further away. There will eventually be a time when places to put garbage will run out. We are trying to delay that as long as possible.

      So you are a selfish (you will only do thinks for compensation), lazy (you won't take 3 cans to the curb), self centred (you don't care if it does not effect your directly) person who cares nothing about the environment (you wont reduce the waste stream). I get that. That does not mean we should tailor regulation to cater to people like you. Regulations are meant to change behaviours not accommodate them.

    8. Re:Negative Idea by Zynder · · Score: 1

      Ignoring myself and those like me will result in utter failure. That's the point I was making. Btw, I love you too.

    9. Re:Negative Idea by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      It is not ignoring you it is just not catering to the lowest common denominator. It could also result in you and people like you not being allowed to use the public disposal system.

    10. Re:Negative Idea by Zynder · · Score: 1

      I want to go ahead and give you a golf clap. *golf clap* You have used so many different nuanced phrases to call me so many names without actually calling me them. Bravo. We're done here.

  45. Re:Now everything goes down the sewer by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

    Hopefully none of that stuff is building up to eventually clog your drains -- which would then possibly cost thousands to fix. It could be a cutting off nose to spite your face situation.

  46. Eat our vegetables too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will Government also pass laws that will force us to eat our vegetables?

    Oh wait, they already do that in public schools. The children will be properly trained when they reach adulthood.

  47. Question for Seattle by operagost · · Score: 1

    Politicians and activists are so good at ignoring unintended consequences.

    Where are people supposed to keep all these separate bins in their kitchen? My count says they have four: paper products, aluminum/plastic (hopefully these can be commingled), unrecyclable plastics/cloth, food scraps. This doesn't even address the bins you have to have to hold "hazardous items", like your batteries, fluorescent bulbs, paint, etc. in other areas of your home.

    How do they separate this "compost" stuff from the plastic bags you have to keep it in? Or do they expect people to keep vermin-encrusted bins in their home?

    What's the answer?

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    1. Re:Question for Seattle by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "keep vermin-encrusted bins in their home?"
      If you have vermin in your home you have bigger problems.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Question for Seattle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goddammit! How many times this article am I going to have to flame your stupid ass? The bins will attract the vermin! Why is that so hard?

  48. Re:Why a .357 magnum is useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    go slit your fucking wrists communist nigger loving fucktard

    - bricko

  49. Homeless Question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like to be frugal and not waste food.

    And I don't really like raccoons or people going thru my trash.

    I just hope, the city doesn't want to make it a crime to feed the homeless.

    I have friends that share our leftovers with anyone we know needs the help.

    If that makes us criminals, there are enough of us, to declare us a terrorist organization.

    Making it a crime to help those in need, Now that sounds like terrorism.

  50. burn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    burn your food before tossing it.

  51. Re:It's sad how red communists took over so fast.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So zero communists, then. Why didn't you just say so?

  52. Garaba collectors trying to do basic math, ha ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A hair brain idea. Do they seriously expect the garbage collector to figure out percentages?
    What were the politicians smoking when they came up with this law?

  53. Re:Unconstitutional at best. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This law would be shot down with the first appeal as it is totally ambiguous as well as unconstitutional.

    I have not read it but I'm sure that these will be the grounds for any appeal of which the idiot elite who passed this crap will lose.

    "I haven't read this law and am therefore ignorant of its actual content, but I'm comfortable making predictions about its ability to withstand a court challenge based on an inflammatory Slashdot summary! Why yes, I do huff paint daily, how did you know?"

  54. The headline is misleading. . . by Mr_Wisenheimer · · Score: 2

    . . . it seems the law is not intended to go after residents who "waste food." It is intended to go after residents who put significant amounts of food into the trash bin instead of the food/yard waste bin, the same way it already went after people who were throwing away large amounts of recyclable glasses or cans.

    1. Re:The headline is misleading. . . by halivar · · Score: 1

      That's a lot of words to say "waste food".

    2. Re:The headline is misleading. . . by Kijori · · Score: 1

      No, it isn't. Nobody, other than a few people on Slashdot, think that "food waste" means "food that is being discarded anyway but has been put in the general trash bin rather than the composting bin". If anything, that would be wasted compost, since the stuff in question is not going to be eaten anyway by the time it goes in the wrong bin.

      Amazingly it turns out the EPA actually has a definition of food waste, which agrees with the GP. They say it is "uneaten food and food preparation waste [from various sources". By that definition food that goes into the compost can be "food waste" - so a rule to make you put it in a different bin doesn't change the amount of "food waste" at all.

  55. If you want ii seperated by geekoid · · Score: 1

    do it at a station, don't put that work on residents.
    It's easier, faster, more accurate, and doesn't piss people off.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:If you want ii seperated by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It's really not hard to separate compostable stuff from the rest. It's easier than separating recyclables.

    2. Re:If you want ii seperated by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      Try separating coffee grounds and vegetable parts from garbage especially after they have had time to partially turn to slime. Good luck.

    3. Re:If you want ii seperated by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      You don't separate them, you just dump them in a separate bin to begin with. That's why it's easy.

    4. Re:If you want ii seperated by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      It appeared that you were agreeing with the original poster.

      do it at a station, don't put that work on residents.
      It's easier, faster, more accurate, and doesn't piss people off.

      I may have been clearer if you said something like te following;

      It's really not hard to separate compostable stuff from the rest at the source. It's easier than separating recyclables at the station

      .

  56. Re:Unconstitutional at best. by geekoid · · Score: 1

    "I have not read it .."
    Then STFU.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  57. Re:It's sad how red communists took over so fast.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why am I arguing with myself?

  58. Re:Unconstitutional at best. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've been telling you to STFU for years now and that hasn't slowed you down one bit. What makes you think you're gonna change anyone's mind?

  59. Garbage disposals by Vrallis · · Score: 1

    Time for a spike of in-sink garbage disposal sales!

  60. Ewwwwwwww! by Latent+Heat · · Score: 2
    OK, what kind of food waste am I putting in the municipal trash?

    Chicken leg quarters were on sale, so we cooked a bunch of them in the oven. We ate the chicken meat, and we made a soup from the pan drippings, but we now have a big pile of chicken bones.

    I picked a whole bunch of apples off the ground from the home orchard. Since they have been on the ground, I peel them before eating them. Also, I haven't quite "turned the corner" in controlling the Apple Maggot Fly, so portions of the apples start rotting. I cut those part off, which generates even more food waste. That apple waste should not go in a home compost pile as it would just breed more apple maggot flies. Don't know of the hardiness of the larvae and pupae of this breed of fruit fly in a municipal composter. But if I had a home orchard let alone had apple maggots in it, in the State of Washington I would have already been lined up against the wall.

    So I fill up a curbside bin with cooked chicken bones and apple peels, without the benefit of using a plastic grocery bag as "primary containment", besides, such bags are contraband too, and just brew a smelly mash of these items as I accumulate them in the bin in the week prior to garbage day.

    Ewwwwwwww!

  61. Re:Unconstitutional at best. by archmcd · · Score: 1

    Are we supposed to read the articles? Shit. I've been screwing this up for years.

    --
    I'm not an expert, but I play one on slashdot.
  62. Re:It's sad how red communists took over so fast.. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    The reason why you had "more freedom than today" was because you knew to keep your mouth shut. If you started openly ranting about it like you are now doing on Slashdot, you'd quickly found out just how free you were... and you knew that, so you didn't.

    In this case, though - you can complain as loudly as you want; you can find other like-minded people and organize; and you can vote out the politicians who enacted this law, if you actually have a majority. Or you can just move to another place, and, strangely, you don't even have to ask permission!

  63. Weed by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

    Does the requirement to compost extend to marijuana? If you throw your stems out with your trash (as well as all the leaves and crap that are byproducts of growing your own), will you be subject to fines?

    Hey, this is actually a concern there.

    --
    This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    1. Re:Weed by Zynder · · Score: 1

      Weed is a plant and compostable, therefore, yes it should be placed in the composting bin. Doing otherwise would trigger the fine.

  64. Suspicious by petrus4 · · Score: 1

    I suspect that the law actually has more to do with the incredibly vindictive, recent initiative to completely outlaw homelessness within American cities. This is another means of criminalising dumpster diving.

  65. Invasive species by GWBasic · · Score: 1

    In MA, we're so supposed to put invasive species in the trash instead of compost.

    1. Re:Invasive species by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      Would that make up more than 10% of your trash?

    2. Re:Invasive species by GWBasic · · Score: 1

      Today's it's 75% of my trash. I pulled a whole bunch of Oriental Bittersweet down last weekend. The stuff is taking over my town's woods and killing all the native plants. It's loaded with seeds, so the only proper way to dispose of it is either burning, or the municipal waste stream. (In my case, the municipal waste stream is a trash-burning power plant.)

    3. Re:Invasive species by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      Actually invasive species are not compostables so you would not get dinged with the fine. You may have to point that out if they ticket you but I doubt you would pay in the end.

  66. Re:It's sad how red communists took over so fast.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why am I arguing with myself?

    No, I'm not!

  67. Recycling by Kalium70 · · Score: 1

    "Yes, well, it sounds delightful. I can't wait to start pawing through my garbage like some starving raccoon!"

  68. article got it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    uh - this article got it all backwards ..

    the fine is if you dont compost -- you can waste all the food you want, as long as you put it in the compost bin.

    1. Re:article got it wrong by n6kuy · · Score: 1

      ... or throw it out into the street.

      --
      If you disagree with me on social issues, then it's pretty clear that you are a narrow-minded bigot.
  69. Weight or volume? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally! A sensible, on-topic posting!

    Keep thinking like an engineer/ systems person, how do they plan to compost it? What equipment will be used and at what cost? Will this be loss like recycling in NYC? Once they have this compost, what happens? Can they sell it to any of the farmers in Seattle? Are there any such farms?