Slashdot Mirror


NASA Eyes Crew Deep Sleep Option For Mars Mission

astroengine writes: A NASA-backed study explores an innovative way to dramatically cut the cost of a human expedition to Mars — put the crew in stasis. The deep sleep, called torpor, would reduce astronauts' metabolic functions with existing medical procedures. Torpor also can occur naturally in cases of hypothermia. "Therapeutic torpor has been around in theory since the 1980s and really since 2003 has been a staple for critical care trauma patients in hospitals," aerospace engineer Mark Schaffer, with SpaceWorks Enterprises in Atlanta, said at the International Astronomical Congress in Toronto this week. "Protocols exist in most major medical centers for inducing therapeutic hypothermia on patients to essentially keep them alive until they can get the kind of treatment that they need." Coupled with intravenous feeding, a crew could be put in hibernation for the transit time to Mars, which under the best-case scenario would take 180 days one-way.

34 of 236 comments (clear)

  1. What will happen to their physical condition by Meshach · · Score: 2

    If they are just sleeping (or in whatever state they are in) will not their muscles deteriorate? After having no nourishment for several weeks most people will waste away to nothing.

    --
    "Maybe this world is another planet's hell"
    Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:What will happen to their physical condition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, the article has the following text pretty much at the top:

      "During interplanetary transit, the crew would receive low-level electrical impulses to key muscle groups to prevent muscular atrophy."

    2. Re:What will happen to their physical condition by wile_e_wonka · · Score: 2

      Thanks for RTFA for me. Now I won't bother.

    3. Re:What will happen to their physical condition by sycodon · · Score: 4, Funny

      My teenager sleeps all day but still can walk and talk when she gets up.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    4. Re:What will happen to their physical condition by DittoBox · · Score: 3, Informative

      This won't help with bone density loss, lowered heart strength, or a number of other issues.

      --
      Good. Cheap. Fast. Pick Two.
    5. Re:What will happen to their physical condition by gcnaddict · · Score: 2

      You'll lose most of that on Mars anyway. Reduced gravity :)

      --
      Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
    6. Re:What will happen to their physical condition by TWX · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Maybe it's time to actually design a ship with a centrifuge in it, so that a lot of the effects of microgravity are mitigated...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    7. Re:What will happen to their physical condition by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Informative

      IV feeding doesn't mean that your muscles are actually going to be being built. Unless you're using them, your body doesn't try to repair and build them up.

      When your body temperature is lowered, and your metabolism is reduced, you also reduce the physiological processes that cause muscle deterioration. Also you can "exercise" in your sleep by using mild electric pulses to contract your muscles.

    8. Re:What will happen to their physical condition by BaronAaron · · Score: 2

      This is also in TFA:

      One design includes a spinning habitat to provide a low-gravity environment to help offset bone and muscle loss.

    9. Re:What will happen to their physical condition by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But what of lack of gravity? How does the sleeping one deal with bone loss?

      Lack of gravity causes your heart and bones to weaken. The heart problem can be ameliorated by putting your legs in a partial vacuum suction, pulling blood away from your body core. This simulates the pooling of blood in your legs while standing on Earth. Then you heart has to work to pump it back up. For the bones, I dunno, but likely the lower body temperature and reduced metabolism would reduce bone deterioration as well. So you would have done loss during deep sleep, but likely less than you would if you were awake.

      A better long term solution is to genetically modify humans to make them better adapted to life in space.

    10. Re:What will happen to their physical condition by wasteoid · · Score: 4, Funny

      Plus by the time the ship arrives at its destination, the good astronauts will be separated from the bad ones.

    11. Re:What will happen to their physical condition by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

      "During interplanetary transit, the crew would receive low-level electrical impulses to key muscle groups to prevent muscular atrophy."

      What about "that" muscle? Or is it going to be an all-women crew?

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    12. Re:What will happen to their physical condition by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 2

      Turns out, that is probably a LOT harder than we'd imagine. You know the 'stationary' bike they use on the ISS to keep in shape? turns out, its attached to the station in all sorts of weird special ways to keep you from shaking the station to pieces/rotating the station due to the forces the spinning wheel/pedaling action causes. If a exercise bike in space is that bloody hard, imagine what a ship with a multi-person hamster wheel will be like to engineer.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  2. Sounds a bit risky by jandrese · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The problem with this idea is that if anything goes wrong there's no hospital you can rush the people to, and there is always a risk of something going wrong when you start messing with biological systems like this. I suppose we are getting more data about the process regularly from hospitals, but NASA is going to want to do a lot of their own experiments first. I guess since we are nowhere near getting ready to launch the Mars mission it isn't too bad. They still have time.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
    1. Re:Sounds a bit risky by mythosaz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More or less risky than putting a team of men and/or women in a tin can and blasting them toward Mars?

      No matter what, they're going to end up at least 6,778km from the nearest hospital. :)

    2. Re:Sounds a bit risky by NotDrWho · · Score: 3, Funny

      If anything goes wrong, they'll just wake up in a distant future where everyone is really stupid, or they're a delivery boy, or the Earth is ruled by damned dirty apes. Either way, hilarious hijinks and adventures will follow. Problem solved!

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    3. Re:Sounds a bit risky by MozeeToby · · Score: 2

      You're giving them too much credit. Yes, these ideas have been used to great effect in emergency rooms around the world: chilling someone for a few hours, even days in extreme cases can do wonders depending on the situation. Chilling someone for a few months? 18 months? I think I'll pass on that one, at the very least I'll wait a good long time while a few 10s of thousands of others try it first.

  3. Re:well who's by scotts13 · · Score: 5, Funny

    going to watch the kettle? so to speak.

    I imagine they would have to have one hell of an upgrade in remote control or assisted
    intelligence to handle any emergencies.

    ~G

    One just has to be careful of the acronym used for the computers name, and assiduously avoid omnipresent red-glowing video eyes. Then you'll be fine.

  4. more details on the technology used. by nimbius · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nasa is using a combination appropach to this statis project. Whereas before drugs and temperature controlled environments had to be used, the far more economical approach of C-SPAN recordings of US Senator Robert Byrd are used to maintain a comatose like state. This is induced with a combination of John Kerry lectures and once astronauts must be awakened, the system automatically switches to arguments against climate change as presented by the congressional science committee.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  5. Necessity is the mother of invention by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

    Send 'em there first and they'll have a huge incentive to figure out the food conundrum.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  6. A drastic solution for a minor problem by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

    So, we've saved 180 days worth of food and consumables for each passenger, but have done so at great risk to them. Okay, sure. Now, if we can just keep them in that state, we may not need the substantially greater amount of supplies that are necessary to sustain life once they actually arrive at their destination.

  7. Re:Ooops oh my! by roc97007 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What if they never wake up?

    They'll be dead.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  8. HAL 9000: "I'm sorry, I'm afraid I can't do that" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Captain: "Please re-animate the mars crew!"
    HAL 9000: "Windows 420 refuses to boot in secure mode.",
                                        "Would you like to play a game of solitaire on Windows XP instead?"

  9. Longterm use - tried out on humans ? by burni2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    All information points to Torpor as a short term treatment option - indeed there are animals but those are adapted to that condition, humans are not.

    The first set of problems that comes to my mind are kidney stones -> Solution catheter/bladder flushning -> next problem infections in the urinary tract due to catheters. Due to the urinary tract not being "flushed" regularly keeping the germs in the lower urinary system. This problem is also much more challenging for women.

    Also the subjection of different germ kinds to the lower temperature needs to be taken into account.

    Different germ populations have different temperature ranges were they show different reproduction rates. If the cold condition does not favour the reproduction rate that the lactic acid producing germs over the germs from No.2
    this can lead to -> Vaginal flora will be less acidic = starting point for "unwanted/dangerous" germs from No.2

    Don't think that when your body is in this "pseudo stasis"
    germs are too, they aren't.

    1. Re:Longterm use - tried out on humans ? by radtea · · Score: 2

      TFA says it has been used up to seven days in humans, so it's only a factor of ten or so to get a significant chuck of Mars transport out of the way.

      In general, chemical reactions slow down with temperature, and while typical therapeutic hypothermia involves fairly high temperatures (~33 C) there may be room to reduce this considerably. Humans will never hibernate without a whole lot of physiological intervention, but it is far too early to say whether or not metabolic activity--including that of our commensal bacteria--can be reduced sufficiently to sustain a mission to Mars.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
  10. Just Go Nuclear and Get There Quick by thrich81 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At the risk of proposing simplistic answers to these technical questions (as per /. standard), I don't know why NASA isn't considering nuclear propulsion as their first choice for crewed missions to Mars. The nuclear thermal engines were investigated intensively and test articles tested and built in the 60's and were ostensibly cancelled only because there was no mission for them, not due to technical show-stoppers. Once you have a nuclear capability, trips around the Solar System become nearly routine. NASA should let Musk work on chemical rockets for his Mars trips and spend tax money on nuclear which the private guys can't do.

    1. Re:Just Go Nuclear and Get There Quick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      And pollute the vaccuum of space with all that radiation? Some of us have to breathe that stuff!

    2. Re:Just Go Nuclear and Get There Quick by Garfong · · Score: 2

      Which section says that? Searching the Outer Space Treaty for the word nuclear, I can only find prohibitions on nuclear weapons, not nuclear power. IIRC the USSR launched several small nuclear reactors into earth orbit.

    3. Re:Just Go Nuclear and Get There Quick by Beck_Neard · · Score: 2

      Yes, some nuclear engines were tested and yes, none of them exactly blew up. But nuclear engines wouldn't make a Mars trip any less expensive or much shorter. It's estimated that a nuclear rocket would shorten the length of a Mars trip from 6 months to... 4 months. And this would come at huge increase in mission complexity and cost. Not worth it.

      For exploring the outer solar system, though, nuclear rockets could have value.

      --
      A fool and his hard drive are soon parted.
  11. Re:OK. by LduN · · Score: 2

    OR I just figured out a clever idea, that might piss of any aliens the encounter. Feed the astronauts beans, attach hoses to their butts nad use "natural gas" for thrust. In a perfect vacuum I'm sure farts do give some accelertion... think of it like an organic Ion engine

  12. Re:Even better idea... by WrongMonkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There are no conceivable circumstances where Earth would be less suitable for life than Mars. Even during the worst extinction level events, Earth was a paradise compared to Mars.

  13. Torpornauts! by PapayaSF · · Score: 2

    I hereby coin the word "torpornauts," which had zero Google hits when I checked.

    --
    Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
  14. Re:Even better idea... by WrongMonkey · · Score: 2

    When the sun goes red giant, Mars is likely to be engulfed, too. Feel free to try again.

  15. intravenous feeding by manu0601 · · Score: 2

    I wonder what happens to guts microbes with 180 days of intravenous feeding. If we fail to slow down their metabolism too, they will start to eat the host's bowels.