Slashdot Mirror


PETA Is Not Happy That Google Used a Camel To Get a Desert "StreetView"

First time accepted submitter flopwich writes Google used a camel-mounted camera to get a 'street view' of a stretch of desert in the United Arab Emirates. PETA's director Ingrid E. Newkirk is upset about it, saying they should have used jeeps. "These days, jeeps are in common use in the desert, as are light planes and even dune buggies, and satellite images could also easily have been taken instead," she said. "(Google) should leave camels out of its activites altogether."

8 of 367 comments (clear)

  1. PETA won't be happy until all animals are extinct by Grantbridge · · Score: 5, Informative

    PETA don't like animals having any relationship with humans. They put down the vast majority of dogs they recieve rather than re-home them because they think that's more "humane" (and it's cheaper..)

    They would rather you killed the camel and used a jeep to travel across the desert.

    They are scum, and they won't be happy until there are no animals left on planet Earth except mankind.

  2. WTF? by B33rNinj4 · · Score: 3, Informative

    PETA needs to focus on real issues. It's not like those cameras were tremendous burdens, or that the camels were abused.

  3. Re:PETA won't be happy until all animals are extin by Oligonicella · · Score: 4, Informative

    "they're pretty consistent that they just don't want people to affect animals" - I'd have to say outright killing +90% of the animals they take in for "adoption" is affecting those animals, wouldn't you? They're scum.

  4. Re:PETA won't be happy until all animals are extin by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was skeptical about the claim that PETA euthanizes so many animals, but studies say it's true, and may even understate the situation.

    The Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services report on their investigation found that 94% of the animals given to PETA for adoption were instead euthanized, 90% within one day.

    This is not ethical treatment of animals. There's no "nuance" here. Putting the vast majority of healthy pets to death rather than trying to find homes for them is cruel and highly unusual.

    Of course, with $35 million in annual revenue, who can afford to take care of the animals, what with paying all the salaries for the people working for PETA to exploit them? PETA's job is to raise funds to pay PETA salaries. The animals are just raw material to be exploited, then tossed in a dumpster

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  5. Re:And? by Dishevel · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just came here to say .... "Fuck PETA"

    --
    Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  6. Re:And? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Doesn't PETA have a horrible track record of killing most of the animals it "saves"?

    Yes.

  7. Re:PETA won't be happy until all animals are extin by MtHuurne · · Score: 4, Informative

    In the particular case of dogs, I'd argue that having contact with humans is their natural way of living. Over ten thousand years of contact with humans has shaped the species. There is no way you can consider any dog to be not exposed to humans: it's in their genes.

  8. Re:And? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    > It's the animal's native environment.

    Actually, No. Camels are only in desert areas because they were domesticated and bred to survive there. Their native environment is plains and tundra.