Wind Power Is Cheaper Than Coal, Leaked Report Shows
merbs writes: A leaked report shows wind is the cheapest energy source in Europe, beating the presumably dirt-cheap coal and gas by a mile. Conventional wisdom holds that clean energy is more expensive than its fossil-fueled counterparts. Yet cost comparisons show that renewable energy sources are often cheaper than their carbon-heavy competition. The report (PDF) demonstrates that if you were to take into account mining, pollution, and adverse health impacts of coal and gas, wind power would be the cheapest source of energy.
To decry wind energy, saying we're slowing the rotation of the earth down or something.
And I'd wager that coal - - kills birds, too.
Coal doesn't kill birds. People with coal kill birds . . .
. . . or should that be birds with coal kill birds . . . or people . . . ?
Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
Depends on if it is a European or African swallow
Can you kill two birds with one coal?
Learn to love Alaska
Man, you have to stay out of your office. You are apparently drawing these creatures to you.
Go sit in the forest for a while, and let them settle on the tree branches around you.
If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
It's "en masse", it's French. You're like those people trying to sound smart by using Latin phrases but incorrectly... per say.
Turbines kill an insignificant number of birds by comparison with Windows. We need to get rid of Windows. Who knew? https://www.sciencenews.org/ar...