Slashdot Mirror


Eggcyte is Making a Pocket-Sized Personal Web Server (Video)

Eggcyte has been working on this for two years. It's on Kickstarter now; a personal server you can use to share music, video, text, and just about anything else without resorting to cloud-based services where one weak password can put your private celebrity photos (you are a celebrity, right?) into the wrong hands. If you suddenly decide you don't want to share the information on your Egg any more, turn it off. If you suddenly have something new to share, like a video you just shot of the Loch Ness Monster capturing an alien spaceship, you can connect your Egg to the Internet anywhere you find a wireless access point. The main thing, say the Eggcyte people, is that your data is yours and should stay that way. Facebook and other cloud-based "sharing" companies use your data to learn about you. Here in the U.S. their primary purpose may be to show you ads for things you might want to buy. In more repressive countries, cloud-based sharing services may use your private data in ways that could be hazardous to your health. Of course, our government people would never keep track of what we post on Twitter and other online services... or would they? (Alternate Video Link)

94 comments

  1. Web Server? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 4, Informative

    You did read the TOS of your ISP provider, right? Some don't allow any server at all (email, Web, etc) on your home connection.

    1. Re:Web Server? by davydagger · · Score: 3, Interesting

      very loosely enforced, I've been running home servers for over a decade.

    2. Re:Web Server? by Damarkus13 · · Score: 1

      True, but if you start streaming video of the Loch Ness monster to every amateur cryptozoologist on the internet, you will probably be noticed by your ISP.

    3. Re:Web Server? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. And then still a practical problem is that most of those "home" type subscriptions come with asymmetric download/upload speeds.
      Good luck running a server with only 1/10th of a decent transfer speed.

    4. Re:Web Server? by jedidiah · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Once you stop keeping a low profile, being noticed by your ISP is really the least of your worries.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    5. Re:Web Server? by msauve · · Score: 1

      Yet another example of violating net neutrality.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    6. Re:Web Server? by Damarkus13 · · Score: 1

      I have to admit, I have no idea what you are trying to imply.

    7. Re:Web Server? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      very loosely enforced, I've been running home servers for over a decade.

      I have too, but RCN in the Boston area just started blocking port 22 a couple weeks ago. Had to switch to a non-standard port for ssh, and now I can't connect from work as the outgoing ports are blocked...

    8. Re:Web Server? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously have no idea what net neutrality is. They tell you in the TOS what they allow you to do with the product they're providing to you. You accepted those terms, deal with it.

      Net neutrality is about throttling your traffic depending on the service you're using. Nothing to do with hosting a home server.

    9. Re:Web Server? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Net neutrality (also network neutrality or Internet neutrality) is the principle that Internet service providers and governments should treat all data on the Internet equally, not discriminating or charging differentially by user, content, site, platform, application, type of attached equipment, or mode of communication.

      Emphasis mine.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    10. Re:Web Server? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and yet another example of how lack of net neutrality stifles competition.

    11. Re:Web Server? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A server that talks to your phone, personal computers, usb devices and is on you at all times? Its a stalker/phisher/agency's wet dream unless you think the included security is better than anything on the current market...

    12. Re:Web Server? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, why the fuck does /. force you to comment as anon in some threads?

    13. Re:Web Server? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Had to switch to a non-standard port for ssh, and now I can't connect from work as the outgoing ports are blocked...

      If they're still allowing port 22 out where you work, set up a firewall rule on your server that directs port 22 traffic coming from your work IP to your SSH server port.

    14. Re:Web Server? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Had to switch to a non-standard port for ssh, and now I can't connect from work as the outgoing ports are blocked...

      If they're still allowing port 22 out where you work, set up a firewall rule on your server that directs port 22 traffic coming from your work IP to your SSH server port.

      Port 22 traffic never makes it to the server anymore.

    15. Re:Web Server? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume that they're afraid that Nessie and Bigfoot will hunt you down and kill you, which is much easier since you're carrying your website in your pocket.

      I have no idea what this product can do which a random smartphone cannot, or why people think that they are more competent at securing a server than Facebook is.

    16. Re:Web Server? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't forget to fuck off, did you? Fuck TOS. They are monoplies.

    17. Re:Web Server? by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      You did read the TOS of your ISP provider, right? Some don't allow any server at all (email, Web, etc) on your home connection.

      Who cares what it says?

    18. Re:Web Server? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then RCN is not an ISP, by my definition.

    19. Re:Web Server? by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      Illuminati.

    20. Re:Web Server? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You will when you wake up with your mouth sewed to someones asshole.

    21. Re:Web Server? by GNious · · Score: 1

      You did read the TOS of your ISP provider, right? Some don't allow any server at all (email, Web, etc) on your home connection.

      That's going to be an issue for a lot of people, who play video-games. Many games will use one of the machines as a host, to which the others connect, basically causing that player to be running a (temporary) game-server.

    22. Re:Web Server? by StripedCow · · Score: 1

      And what about asymmetric upload/download speeds that most ISPs provide.
      Good luck running a server with an uplink that can handle only 1/10th of a decent tranfer speed.

      --
      If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
    23. Re: Web Server? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't use ISPs that don't allow servers! And for sure don't use ComCast for any reason!

  2. Website in your pocket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is that a personal website in your pocket or are you just pleased to see me?

    1. Re:Website in your pocket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, did you just stream all over the front of your pants? Again?

  3. Smartphone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would I want to buy this hardware instead of using a software solution on my Smartphone? Seems that like would make a lot more sense...

    1. Re:Smartphone? by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      ...here's an even more novel idea: just store data on your phone and stop worrying about Rube Goldberg machines meant to get around the limitations of locked down and crippled mobile platforms.

      This sounds like an alternative to a network hard drive and likely to be used for similar reasons.

      Spamming the world may not be it's actual intent.

      The web is probably supported by your highly proprietary mobile device even if nothing else is. Probably simple to use too.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:Smartphone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... your going to turn your phone - which is on a metered connection at least part of the time - into a web server? A... web... server...?

      This isn't just about STORAGE... it's about SERVER. Share something from your phone? THROUGH Facebook/dropbox/youtube/etc... or via your own server.

      completely different devices and services.

    3. Re:Smartphone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. But at least i'll have that option in a pinch (which is not an option for the Egg - no cell radio). I'll do it through WiFi, which is what the Egg does. Sharing is really a transient activity. Not a 24x7 thing.

  4. So, any WAP running DD-WRT plus a thumbdrive? by pla · · Score: 1

    Revolutionary! So instead of needing to actually install DD-WRT and buy a separate thumbdrive... They'll include it all in one tidy package!

    But but but... "Cloud"!

    1. Re:So, any WAP running DD-WRT plus a thumbdrive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Revolutionary! So instead of needing to actually install DD-WRT and buy a separate thumbdrive... They'll include it all in one tidy package!

      TFA: "So it has got Engine X on it,"

      It's almost like it has nginx too, but who the hell proofreads these days?

  5. Just use an old laptop instead. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    Take the old laptop, remove the hard drives and battery, stick in a bootable usb stick or memory card running your favorite distro, and you have a very quiet, low-energy server for all your needs.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    1. Re:Just use an old laptop instead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      old laptops didn't have USB port :)

    2. Re:Just use an old laptop instead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, old laptops are very portable and low-energy.

    3. Re:Just use an old laptop instead. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      old laptops didn't have USB port :)

      Of course they do. Ancient laptops might not, but they're so old you can't give them away.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    4. Re:Just use an old laptop instead. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Yes, old laptops are very portable and low-energy.

      Take out the battery from one of those old clunkers (you won't be needing it and it probably doesn't work anyway) and you reduce the weight by a lot, as well as the energy draw.

      Remove the old hard drives (they're noisy, generate heat, and consume a - comparatively - lot of electricity), and stick in a 64 gig usb stick for $35.00

      Set the screen to go blank after 5 minutes.

      So you now have a device that you can actually use to SEE and EDIT what you're storing and sharing. Can't do that with the Eggcyte. And you still need to plug in the eggcyte to recharge it and you need a wifi connection (no, you can't just use a direct ethernet connection) and port forwarding at your router to avoid the whole "use their subdomain service".

      Since you can get dual-core laptops for free nowadays, your total outlay is $35.00, as opposed to $200 and a 9-month wait. And your old laptop, you can always upgrade the storage by either plugging in another usb or flash card (or even buying a cheap internal or external hard drive). Get a terabyte of storage for less than half of what they're asking for 64gig. And you'll almost certainly have more than 1 gig of ram.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    5. Re:Just use an old laptop instead. by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      I had a Samsung with a DX4/100 processor and a USB port. Used that right up until around 2007, when it finally expired.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    6. Re:Just use an old laptop instead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reliability of USB memory sticks and sdhc-cards have taken a downhill, at least in my experience quite a many of them will break down, if used for writing "too much". At least one should keep the backups in shape, instead of relying on the cheap flash storage.

    7. Re:Just use an old laptop instead. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      So buy the good stuff. It's the same as hard drives - they will all eventually fail. Same as the flash memory in the Eggcyte.

      But at least with an old laptop, the usb stick goes, you just buy another usb stick and you're back in business.

      You can always buy good usb sticks on sale. I used a 16 gig kingston for a couple of years as primary storage on a laptop that would only boot from cd. So when I was much larger kingston usb sticks on sale, I bought one, and the laptop now boots off the usb stick directly.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  6. What? by sideslash · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How does this address leakage of private media on the internet? Sure, you can "turn it off" to disable public access, but you can do that on DropBox too.

    The typical pattern, whether DropBox or "Eggcyte" is something like the following:

    (1) You post private stuff on the cloud
    (2) somebody else accesses it, whether it's intentionally or unintentionally shared
    (3) bad actors download the media and publish it on other outlets such as 4chan
    (4) you panic and disable the original share, although of course it is now too late.
    (5) Sad stories about you are published on news sites, along with stern and moralizing finger wagging.

    1. Re:What? by Damarkus13 · · Score: 2
      I was just logging in to post this same thing. Just having access to the power switch on a server does not magically make it more secure.

      Along the same lines, simply having control over where your cloud server is physically located, doesn't make it not a cloud server.

    2. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cloud i feel like a buzzword for the cost of hosting/hardware fallen so cheap it's like a commodity. Which is good, so why go reverse and package it up so it's more costly and still relies on a third party. How does that offer value? Why the fuck did they choose tizen os, also?

  7. 200 dollars is too expensive by Karmashock · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can buy a raspberry pi with all the addons for less then 100 USD, load a webserver on it, and have more functionality then what this thing offers.

    Yeah it has a screen and yeah its probably easier to set up. But that is what I'm buying then. A screen and an easier set up... for twice the price.

    As to sticking it in your pocket... The whole web domain thing is great but subdomains are nothing new. I can get a free subdomain from any of several services. I do it all the time. Any system I work with on a regular basis that is on a dynamic IP gets a subdomain synced to it so that I can always login to that system. All they're doing is setting up a subdomain on a server they own and selling this unit... which is nice but isn't really competitive with a raspberry pi.

    Am I missing anything? The thing is neat... its just redundant.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:200 dollars is too expensive by CaptainDork · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, you are missing something ... a revenue stream.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    2. Re:200 dollars is too expensive by RoverDaddy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you'll read my other comment you'll see that I basically agree with your assessment. However, for a consumer product, this amount of markup is probably reasonable. You'll never get a raspberry pi, wifi adapter, bluetooth adapter, battery and video screen to fit into that form factor. That's where engineering design and packaging, and custom circuit design come into play. And the software has a price too. Even if you or I could cobble up the basics of this product on our own, it still might be useful for the average consumer.

      All that said, I do wonder whether the market can bear a $200 price for this device.

      --
      RETURN without GOSUB in line 1050
    3. Re:200 dollars is too expensive by Karmashock · · Score: 2

      Well, sure... but why do we need all that crap?

      1. Why does it need a screen when it has a web interface? Totally pointless.

      2. Why do you need to be able to upload things to it directly without a network interface? Also totally pointless.

      3. Why does it need a wifi adapter? This thing is going to live on someone's desk. This notion of bringing it around your purse... why? The unit will work most effectively plugged into a router sitting on a shelf somewhere.

      So subtracting those three features which are utterly superfluous... 200 dollars? Nope.

      I have three raspberry pis. They're great. One of them is a personal web/file server for my home. One of them is a home media center. The last one is a pure toy that I use in projects.

      The Pi is cool. I can do anything with it. If I change my mind about something I can repurpose it for something else. I can't do that with this egg thing. It is what it is what it is.

      And that is fine if people know what they want and don't mind the 100 percent mark up and features that even they won't give a crap about. Go with it.

      But for me... for the sorts of people that read slashdot?... uh no.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    4. Re:200 dollars is too expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You'll never get a raspberry pi, wifi adapter, bluetooth adapter, battery and video screen to fit into that form factor.

      Why wouldn't I. That's called a smart phone. A Huawei Y300 (for example) has a faster processor than a Pi, the same amount of RAM as a Pi, Wifi, Bluetooth, battery and a touch screen. And since it's a phone, it also has GSM and 3G. Plus it runs reliably on USB power. And it costs $100.

    5. Re:200 dollars is too expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used a new $12 PogoPlug off ebay, took it out of its case and put it in a small project enclosure with a 1TB laptop hdd, added usb bluetooth and wifi and wired it directly into my car.. it runs a Plex Media Server, Music Player Daemon out bluetooth to my head unit and creates a local offline WiFi network so passengers with tablets/phones can access media.. cost ~$100 (including HDD) and works great.

      oah yeah and I installed the original PogoPlug cloud storage software back on it so its syncing pictures with mobiles via a nice native client.

    6. Re:200 dollars is too expensive by cmseagle · · Score: 2

      For a lot of people, "a screen and an easier set up" are easily worth that extra $100 over a Raspberry Pi.

    7. Re:200 dollars is too expensive by ihtoit · · Score: 2

      my ZTE F930 has all except wifi, is smaller than a WD Passport hard drive, is currently equipped with an 8GB SD card (it'll take a 16), and cost £35 in 2010. Still works, no need for an "upgrade" which pretty much means I get to keep my battery that's still good for a week between charges :)

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    8. Re:200 dollars is too expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can buy a raspberry pi with all the addons for less then 100 USD, load a webserver on it, and have more functionality then what this thing offers.

      Or you could spend about the same amount on a BeagleBone Black, and have a computer with decent hardware. :-D

    9. Re:200 dollars is too expensive by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Same difference.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    10. Re:200 dollars is too expensive by uolamer · · Score: 1

      I agree, before I would do all that I would just setup a server maybe at..

      https://aws.amazon.com/free/

      and run a site from there.. I can can setup any level of encryption, authentication, etc I want and not have to charge, carry that thing around, rely on wifi and sell out $200.

      --
      s/©//g
  8. Interesting project for Rapsberry Pi by RoverDaddy · · Score: 1

    Almost everything (maybe everything?) this does could be done with a Raspberry Pi, but the result would obviously be a bit larger to carry around. It does seem like they've added some nice polish to the software in the form of the automatic data gathering (from a USB connected device), and they obviously need a back end system to give each Egg a subdomain under eggcyte.com.

    --
    RETURN without GOSUB in line 1050
  9. Not a cure-all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People can still copy your photos and post them somewhere else online.

    1. Re:Not a cure-all by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      watermarks and due diligence - how much are your photos worth to you in terms of litigation?

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  10. Solution looking for a problem. by kuzb · · Score: 2

    Now that everyone has a smartphone in their pocket there doesn't seem to be a lot of need for something like this. Why would I buy another device to carry around when I already have a perfectly capable computer in my pocket?

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    1. Re:Solution looking for a problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      im still trying to figure out how this is any safer or better than cloud or better than actually using existing tools that have been in existence for years.

    2. Re:Solution looking for a problem. by gnupun · · Score: 1

      Lots of storage and the ability to share data with other computers and only a select group of people (i.e. exclude strangers, and companies like dropbox, facebook etc.)

    3. Re:Solution looking for a problem. by kuzb · · Score: 1

      If I'm really that worried about people at a company potentially seeing pictures of my kids I'll set up my own server at home with an SSL connection and stream from that.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  11. uptime as spotty as wifi coverage by jjbarrows · · Score: 1

    So my website goes down everytime I'm not in wifi range?

    1. Re:uptime as spotty as wifi coverage by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      I think the idea is that you have not only control of the killswitch, you have instant control over access to individual files on the device instead of adjusting settings over a web interface and waiting x number of hours for the new settings to propagate. Nice idea, not new, but the implementation is fairly novel in a "I want one of those but in shocking pink" kind of way.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  12. Sounds more limited than meetlima.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plus the https://meetlima.com/blog/ blog shows already assembled units and stuff, so it is presumably past the kickstarter phase?

  13. FreedomBox by PineHall · · Score: 4, Informative

    Eggcyte reminds me of the work of the FreedomBox Foundation. Both talk about being in control of your data and both are aimed at very small servers. FreedomBox appears to be more privacy oriented than Eggcyte, but both are responding to the same need of being in control of your internet life.

    1. Re:FreedomBox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if it was really a need, the tools have already been around forever.

    2. Re:FreedomBox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The need is growing. Your argument is kind of like the people who say that 90% of the public is in favor of more background checks for gun purchases. The reason we don't have more such background checks is even though 90% are in favor, they just aren't that strongly in favor. Same thing with the need for tools like freedombox, lots of people think it is a good idea, they just haven't felt really cared enough. But with stories about people losing control of their data to the NSA and criminal hackers people are starting to care more.

  14. Nothing special by davydagger · · Score: 2

    For a low end webserver, the HW of a cellphone will do, as will many ARM development boards like odroid xdroid, beagleboard.

    In addition there is pogoplug, plug computers, etc....

    This has been done already, and there are already many viable solutions, commericially

  15. Encryption? by TubeSteak · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Kickstarter page makes no mention of encryption between my device and the Egg.
    Nor anything about encrypted storage on the device itself.

    If your selling point is personal security, you should really be mentioning how your device is meaningfully secure.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  16. Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *Yawn* other companies like Drobo have been offering similar products for years. How exactly is this news?

  17. So they just reinvented Pogoplug? by El+Rey · · Score: 1

    But a lot more expensive?

    1. Re:So they just reinvented Pogoplug? by gnupun · · Score: 1

      Pogoplug costs $50/year. Why should you pay that much to store on your own device? You can get get your own shared hosting webserver for that much money.

    2. Re:So they just reinvented Pogoplug? by El+Rey · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying you should. I have a Pogoplug that I bought for $20 on clearance and put Arch Linux on it. It works fine as a light web server for static pages and file sharing.

      I'm just saying it's not exactly an original idea and the hardware is more expensive than other plug computers. The hardware only Pogoplug (i.e. before they added cloud storage) didn't seem to have great success and I'm not seeing anything in this product that is so different than the original Pogoplug concept that seems like it would be a game changer in the space.

      From looking at their website for about 30 seconds, it looks like for the $50/year you also get "unlimited" cloud storage and some backup software. Might be worth it from that aspect but I haven't priced cloud storage / backup lately since all of the free offers out there cover my needs at the moment.

  18. prior art? by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    I used to use an ICQ account (redirected via a domain account on 123reg) and client as a webserver for various files, when I didn't want the webserver on I just switched my computer off (or just killed the ICQ client). Worked very well for years.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  19. Putting all your eggs in one basket ... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1
    Notice that you can reserve your sub-domain for only $9. Whoopdee doo ding dong! Now, is that per year, forever, or what, they don't say. And when you go to the demo link, it's "currently offline".

    You see, the cloud services companies take advantage of the fact that most of us don’t know how to buy a domain, set up a website and program it to do what we want. So, what choice do we have but to click the "Accept" button when they show us the license agreement to use their service.

    So instead you want us to buy a subdomain and tied hardware from you, hardware that isn't upgradeable. I can use an old laptop and get a much better screen, much more storage, much better performance, and a wider choice of software. And unlike Tizen, where "the entire SDK has been published under a non-open-source Samsung license", which you can read . Some exerpts:

    IMPORTANT NOTE: This license is primarily applicable to several proprietary components, which are not open sourced. If applicable, the Open Source Software license shall take precedence over the rights and restrictions granted in this Agreement, but solely with respect to such Open Source Software.

    ... and ...

    3.1 Except for the limited license granted to You herein, You agree that all right, title and interest in and to the Tizen SDK including the concepts and technology inherent in them, Samsung or Tizen trademarks, copyrights, patents, trade secrets and other intellectual property rights, are, and at all times shall remain, the sole and exclusive property of Samsung. Except to the extent permitted under this Agreement or by applicable law, You shall not (i) modify, reverse engineer or disassemble any portion of the Tizen SDK; (ii) lease, rent, copy, redistribute or sublicense the Tizen SDK to third party; or (iii) remove, efface or obscure any copyright notices, logos or other proprietary notices or legends included in the Tizen SDK. You may not use any component part of the Tizen SDK in any way independent from the Tizen SDK. You may not load or install any of the Tizen SDK onto mobile phones or any other devices, except a personal computer.

    ... and ...

    8.1 You acknowledge and agree that the Tizen SDK was developed at considerable time and expense by Samsung and contains valuable trade secrets and confidential information of Samsung. Accordingly, You agree to maintain the Tizen SDK in confidence and except as expressly provided in Section 2, You (i) will not disclose or provide access thereto to any person, or (ii) use the Tizen SDK for any purpose not expressly authorized hereby, or permit or authorize any other person to do so.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  20. horribly photoshopped pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://static.squarespace.com/static/53c5ea40e4b0fa582992062e/t/53e9a4a8e4b0cd70f5b4b601/1407820979255/The%20Egg?format=1000w

    about as off center as the idea

  21. Apache runs on an old ipod. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reuse an old pice of hardware instead

    1. Re:Apache runs on an old ipod. by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      I used to have a TCP stack running on an Epson HX-40. Thing ran for two months on one set of AA alkalines. Still got the computer somewhere, it might even still work.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  22. Why is this hardware? Why not just write an App? by Zenin · · Score: 2

    Why not just run a web server App on your smart phone?

    -No second device to buy, carry around, or keep charged.
    -No second device to constantly "sync" with.
    -Far easier to keep patched with security and feature updates.

    Of course, that's putting aside all the issues around trying to run a web server on personal internet access accounts (cell, public wifi, home wifi, work wifi, any of it). The bandwidth issues of trying to share a video of your kids with your family alone will trash most any common internet connection, and that's if it'll be allowed at all (inbound port 80/443) or legal ("no servers on this connection!").

    This project has Epic Fail written all over it.... So I'm sure in classic Kickstarter fashion it'll get funded 10x over it's target. Because, sheeple.

    --
    My /. uid is better then your /. uid
  23. Because of course... by SavvyPlayer · · Score: 1

    The Eggcyte is immune to discovery, hacking and theft.

  24. brilliant! by silfen · · Score: 1

    The solution to insecure devices connected via cloud services is supposed to be another insecure device connected via another cloud service?

    If you want secure hosting, run your own server. You can do that on your desktop, a phone (current or old), or something like the Raspberry Pi.

  25. I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is this better than using something like Cloudfogger which automatically encrypts everything before it's uploaded to the cloud?

  26. False sense of security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't read TFA but they summary makes out that having your own server stops other people mining you data.

    As soon as any of the data leaves the device, you've lost control of it.

    1. Re:False sense of security by gnupun · · Score: 1

      As soon as any of the data leaves the device, you've lost control of it.

      Even if it's encrypted?

  27. Web Server? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then you don't have an Internet Service Provider. You have a Read-only Internet Provider, or R.I.P. Choose a real ISP, if at all possible where you live.

  28. Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Your own webserver". Nothing new here - move on. Had that ability since the web came around in the nineties - web servers were open-source from the start.

  29. cute, but flawed by Tom · · Score: 1

    It's a really cute idea, but from what I've seen so far is lacking a few fundamentals.

    Firstly, there's little mention of user interface design, which if you want this to be used by average Joes and Janes is about the most important thing.

    Secondly, sharing your stuff on your own server is cute, in fact we've only had it for about 30 years, even before the Internet with BBS etc. - the problem is connections, networks. Facebook solved that problem and that's why it works and people use it. If everyone has mynamewithsomerandomadditionbecauseitwasalreadytaken.eggcyte.com - how do you find them? You will need a social network layer on top, at which point you're basically back to Facebook, minus distributed data storage.

    Thirdly, the idea of having it mobile and being able to plug it in anywhere is cute, but it also means that the device - and thus everything I want published - is unavailable while in transit. In practice, the mobility will be a non-issue because of this.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  30. Diaspora pod in a box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So... this is a small server that runs Diaspora - https://diasporafoundation.org/ ? Why does this need funding?

  31. Oh noes, another device to carry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given the (big) size of today's smartphones, I don't see why people would want to carry another, big device. Yeah, the egg has its strengths but they can all be reached with common good sense with the many, current devices already existing.

  32. Glorified by danknight48 · · Score: 1

    USB drive, For idiots.
    Lets be honest.

  33. Re:Why is this hardware? Why not just write an App by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sheeple

    A word used exclusively by the sort of person it describes.

    So you use the word all the time then?

  34. Epic Fail is right ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The screen is what is going to be the undoing of this thing even before it gets off the ground. I know the screen makes it cool, but it brings the cost of the device into the range where its no longer in the acceptable impulse buy range (think $99 price point). The screen is too small to do anything useful on it, and because of it, it screams its desire to be the prominent device in your pocket. The problem is:

    1) we already got one in our pocket that serves this purpose just fine
    2) we don't need two

    The device is vastly inferior in that it almost takes up the same amount of space in our pockets as our smartphone while adding redundant, inferior functionality. It's just not space efficient to carry around for what it does. I use a Sandisk Connect WiFi flash drive for this purpose. Same functionality, but much smaller and does not "compete" with my smartphone. Its complimentary.

  35. Lets do the math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought an iPhone 6 (64GB storage) for $299. On top of my phone, you now want me to buy this thing for an extra $200 for 64GB storage? Remember, this thing does not replace your phone - its, in-addition-to to your phone. I could have upgraded to a 128GB iPhone 6 for an extra $100. Going the Egg route, its $500 for 128GB storage. Going the single phone route, its $400 for 128GB.

    Not to mention the fact that now i'll be carrying around two clunky devices in my pocket rather than one? And one of them will have a subset of the functionality of the other superior device?

    How does that even come close to making any sense at all (financial or otherwise)? Me seriously thinks this is an intelligent test ...