Slashdot Mirror


FBI Director Continues His Campaign Against Encryption

apexcp writes Following the announcements that Apple and Google would make full disk encryption the default option on their smartphones, FBI director James Comey has made encryption a key issue of his tenure. His blitz continues today with a speech that says encryption will hurt public safety.

6 of 284 comments (clear)

  1. Public safety is not the issue by kruach+aum · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The issue is the balance between public safety and personal privacy. Denying the citizen of any democracy the right to encryption of their personal communication is not an appropriate response to the perceived threat to public safety that same encryption would bring.

  2. when we can read your files, you can read ours. by swschrad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    just that simple, Director.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  3. His argument boils down to: by mewsenews · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You don't deserve privacy because criminals don't deserve privacy.

  4. (Re:The Children!) Why? I'm not a pedophile! by Chas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is not our job to make his job easier or effortless.

    Amendment IV

    The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

    Our phones and computers are the modern day equivalent of "papers and effects".

    Encryption affords us the security promised by this amendment.

    Does this make the collection of data by various "letter agency" and police law enforcement departments tougher? YEP!

    Does it raise the possibility of criminals "slipping through the system"? YEP!

    I, for one, REFUSE to be pre-criminalized , simply because I don't choose to automatically drop trou whenever someone demands to see "ze papers". The only appropriate answer for this sort of thing is "Fuck you. Get a warrant."

    I also refuse to abrogate my rights and privileges due to an idiotic appeal to emotion (think of the CHILDREN!)

    *I* am not victimizing children. But, the way law enforcement wants to set things up, EVERYONE gets lumped in as would-be rapists, molesters and murderers.

    Jim Comey needs to be told to shut the hell up, do his job *RIGHT* and be a good little soldier.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  5. Re:(Re:The Children!) Why? I'm not a pedophile! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Also, why are we so hung up on "papers"? I'm pretty sure our founding fathers didn't care about dead tree pulp and were more concerned about protecting the information on the paper. In that light, why would it matter what medium the information is contained on? Be it chiseled stone, carved wood, or a cellphone?

  6. Re:Obama Admin! by ozmanjusri · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why not "Obama Admin Continues Its Campaign Against Encryption"?

    Because they really don't care about the type of encryption Apple and Google are providing. They can get your (meta)data in so many other ways it's irrelevant.

    This faux outrage from the FBI stooge has nothing to do with any perceived difficulty in spying on citizens, it's about harm-management for the corporations that've been negatively affected by spying revelations. Nothing but smoke, mirrors, red herrings and misdirection all the way down.

    Don't believe a word of it, they've shown repeatedly they're self-serving and untrustworthy. Question everything they say and do, and ALWAYS look for the money trail.

    --
    "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."