Slashdot Mirror


NPR: '80s Ads Are Responsible For the Lack of Women Coders

gollum123 writes: Back in the day, computer science was as legitimate a career path for women as medicine, law, or science. But in 1984, the number of women majoring in computing-related subjects began to fall, and the percentage of women is now significantly lower in CS than in those other fields. NPR's Planet Money sought to answer a simple question: Why? According to the show's experts, computers were advertised as a "boy's toy." This, combined with early '80s geek culture staples like the book Hackers: Heroes of the Computer Revolution, as well as movies like War Games and Weird Science, conspired to instill the perception that computers were primarily for men.

20 of 786 comments (clear)

  1. All the movies had women in business by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As I recall, it was more that, in movies and TV, women found romance working in business, and rarely in computing.

    Computing meant anti-social. Business meant meeting attractive men in business suits with lots of money and power.

    Geeks only had time travel in bad looking vans.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:All the movies had women in business by xtal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Computing IS anti social!

      You get good at programming by staring at a screen and figuring things out. For thousands, and thousands, and thousands of hours. There is no getting around that fact.

      The more complicated it gets, the more "anti social" it is. What does that mean anyway? Do we all need to sit around and code by committee?

      --
      ..don't panic
    2. Re:All the movies had women in business by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Computing IS anti social!

      Not before the 1980s.

      You get good at programming by staring at a screen and figuring things out.

      In the 1970s, you got good at programming in a big noisy room full of other coders, reading over each others printouts, and then modifying your card deck, before submitting it to the operator at the window to the machine room. Then you sit around and socialize while you wait for your job to run. It was a very social activity.

      Then personal computers came along, and all that changed. Coding became an isolated activity that you did in a cubicle, or in a bedroom at 2am. Computer screens were harder for collaboration than paper printouts. Fast compilers left no time for socializing.

    3. Re:All the movies had women in business by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Computing IS anti social!

      You have no idea how much I wish that were true. For me, it would be a perk.

      Instead, I spend plenty of time in meetings, coordinating with fellow programmers, working through issues like their code sucks (and for some reason I can't figure out, they think my code sucks), strange emotional attachments they feel towards Visual Studio (even though it costs over $10000 for the full version). And that's only fellow programmers......figuring out what customers, management, vendors all want is another issue (and it's important).

      I just want to sit down, get my job done. Let me program. Instead I end up talking to a bunch of people.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:All the movies had women in business by Aighearach · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually you underscore the lack of socialization during programming. Your attempted counter example shows your social meter is differently calibrated than average people. You accept a very tiny bit of edge dialogue as a replacement for continued socialization all day in typical office jobs.

      The loner might not be a hermit in the mountains, it doesn't change that the job is primarily solitary, even when coordinating with a large team.

  2. Can we stop trying to come up with a reason? by ShaunC · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The only thing responsible for a "lack of women coders" is that fewer women than men are interested in software development as a career path. So what? I have yet to hear a convincing argument as to why this is a problem, why this is something to be concerned about, or why millions of dollars are being thrown around in an attempt to change the situation.

    --
    Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    1. Re:Can we stop trying to come up with a reason? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's a problem because it's clearly fucking systemic, and caused by social factors.

      It's not just "fewer women that men" enter the career.

      It's that "fewer women than used to, where every other intensely technical field has had the opposite trend"(this article)
      It's that People are more likely to pick men for mathematical tests that both genders are proven to do equally well on, even when in the test cases where the specific women are known to outperform the specific men
      It's that sexism is actually cited by women leaving the field
      It's that gender based social norms enforced on children clearly influence their likliehood to enter a sex-typical field

      These aren't just whatever, "it's just people making choices". It's clearly social and political influence.

    2. Re:Can we stop trying to come up with a reason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    3. Re:Can we stop trying to come up with a reason? by pla · · Score: 5, Insightful

      These aren't just whatever, "it's just people making choices". It's clearly social and political influence.

      We "clearly socially and politically influence" people to hold down a job, not smoke, refrain from promiscuous sexual behavior, and a wide variety of other behaviors.

      And yet - We all still have the right to live under a bridge, smoke, fuck anything that moves, yadda yadda yadda.

      When women want to go into tech and can't, we have a problem. When women don't want to go into tech... Hey, start your own marketing campaign like Google has done, but lose the guilt-tripping SJW faux indignation BS.

      Thanks.

    4. Re:Can we stop trying to come up with a reason? by ray-auch · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It is because women are smarter than men, and are making more informed career choices.

      Back in the days of punched cards and computers the size of a whole data centre now, and memory that didn't got away when the power went off (yeah, I know, that one's come around again now), programming was a 9-5 family friendly (as much as any job was) day job. Programmers and operators were often women (my mother was one), if not mostly women - seriously, just do a google images search for "mainframe operator 1960s" (just for one example), those images reflect the number of women working with computers that you'll see in printed material from that era too.

      Somewhere around the 80's - 90's with the personal computer revolution, and gaming, and continuing with the dotcom boom, programming turned into an aggressive deadline-driven first-to-market ship-it-yesterday career, with a long-hours work-till-it's-done culture that spread from startups out to entire parts of the industry (see gaming...). And the women stopped coming.

      To pick a couple of other industries / careers I have some (UK based) knowledge of: in roughly the same time scale, in medical and veterinary, professionals went from being on-call all-hours (junior doctors infamously worked a standard 120hr week) to having out-of-hours contracted out and on-call hours counted into the limits under EU working time directive. Every programming job I've had has required me to opt out of the working time directive, but doctors don't. Now take a guess on two professional careers in the UK which are (or soon will be) majority female... medical (doctors) and veterinary. That is where all the smart women went, and if you want to know why just look at the culture changes in those professions and in programming.

    5. Re:Can we stop trying to come up with a reason? by alexander_686 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Let's extend your argument and look at doctors. What if we cut the number of admissions to medical colleges by 1/2? By reducing the number of doctors we could boost the wages of all doctors! Wouldn’t' that be great? Would that not make our future brighter?

      Probably not.

      You are talking the same position as the old guild members, fighting to keep their privileged position as more productive factories raise productivity and living standards for everybody. I mean it is great that you beat everybody else in the great land rush, but I don't think you should close the gate behind you. I am not even sure you can as I look at India, China, etc. Give them 25 years. Don't focus on short term gain but on long term greed. You will benefit more from vibrant economy than a stagnant one.

  3. Maybe it's learning style? by digsbo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Men started to outpace women at an accelerated rate when the highly personal learning style of "having a pc to play on" became an option. Given that we see more and more of an imbalance in favor of women in group learning environments (college and even moreso in graduate programs), maybe this is just something very obvious, and a good thing for men, as men can excel in solitary study which they can tailor to their own interests and pace. As my wife, a school psychologist said, girls tend to learn better in groups, and don't typically like to work in competitive/solo situations given the choice, whereas boys often do. I'll take the advantage on this one, gladly.

    1. Re:Maybe it's learning style? by greywire · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If we're looking for a reason, I think this is the best one I've heard so far.

      The thing about the media being the cause I think is wrong, that was just an effect.

      The cause I think is spot on, that males are competitive and in general more solitary (damn that testosterone), and females are more apt to be concerned with social aspects. In the late 70's and 80s computers became much more accessible to those competitive loners (nerd stereotyping here).

      Which is to say, its not that females can't do it, or that males are better at it (insert whatever you want for it), its just that they are quite possibly just not interested as much. Before the advent of Personal Computers, computing was mostly prevalent in an academic setting, which is more social..

      --
      -- Senior Software Engineer, Attorney appearance services, locallawyerapp.com.
  4. Oh bullshit by NotDrWho · · Score: 5, Funny

    If 80's pop culture had that much lasting influence, every college student would still be majoring in kicking commie ass and breakdancing.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  5. No it was Apple in 1984 by Spy+Handler · · Score: 5, Funny

    the computer establishment was shown as Big Brother and all the tech workers were depicted as mindless slaves. All shown in dull black and white footage.

    Then comes running a feisty young woman in colorful athletic clothes. She hurls a hammer and destroys the system. Lesson: girls hate computers and break them!

  6. Re:1..2..3 before SJW by NotDrWho · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's the SJW ninnies that are trying to pretend that nerds are the perpetrators here when they are generally powerless and denigrated.

    I find the idea that nerds would ever chase off women particularly amusing. Hell, most of us would KILL to have women around. If women are electing to not pursue the field, it's certainly not because they're unwelcome. On every team that I've ever been on with women, the guys went out of their way to be nice to them.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  7. Re:1..2..3 before SJW by halivar · · Score: 5, Funny

    It might be that they are intimidated by my stylish wardrobe furnished by TJ Max.

  8. Re:1..2..3 before SJW by NotDrWho · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, that's unfortunate. Because, try as I might, I've yet to find a way to make my team more attractive. I guess I could hire some male models, but they generally make pretty shitty coders.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  9. Re:1..2..3 before SJW by shadowrat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's the SJW ninnies that are trying to pretend that nerds are the perpetrators here when they are generally powerless and denigrated.

    I find the idea that nerds would ever chase off women particularly amusing. Hell, most of us would KILL to have women around. If women are electing to not pursue the field, it's certainly not because they're unwelcome. On every team that I've ever been on with women, the guys went out of their way to be nice to them.

    If you listen to the NPR segment, they have a couple of women who were former compsci majors give accounts of how the men in their classes denigrated them and mocked them for missing some knowledge. I'm not certain it's motivated by a "no girls allowed" attitude. I think there's a broader culture of elitism in compsci that motivates people to try to bolster their own egos by jumping on perceived weaknesses in others.

    It's important to note that to focus of the segment was on university compsci courses in the 80s, not women who get employed on professional teams. Generally people are a bit more mature in the workforce (generally). These are 18-22 year old males. They likely were a bit ostracized as nerdy in high school. I think they just get overzealous once they find themselves in a world where athletic prowess is no longer the ultimate display of dominance. they make bad decisions.

    They might even be simply showing off. I think i've tried to impress nerd girls the wrong way. Where i thought i was communicating, "hey look at how good i am at this!", i really was saying, "OMG YOU ARE A STUPID GIRL". I certainly wasn't very good at communicating with women in my late teens and early 20s. i'm only marginally better at it 20 years later.

  10. Re:1..2..3 before SJW by NotDrWho · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm sorry, but wtf is your point? Are you saying that we should be hostile to women instead of nice, or nice instead of hostile, or that we should completely ignore them?

    You say that men who are mean to women chase them off. Then you say men who are nice to women chase them off. And I'm pretty sure you would say that men ignoring women would chase them off. SO WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU SUGGEST?

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.