Slashdot Mirror


Jedi-ism Becomes a Serious Religion

An anonymous reader writes: 390,127 Brits declared their religion as Jediism in their last census — many as a joke, but some are quite serious, the BBC reports. Cambridge University Divinity Faculty researcher Beth Singler estimates at least 2,000 of them are "genuine," around the same number as the Church of Scientology. The U.K. Church of Jediism has 200,000 members worldwide. Their belief system has expanded well beyond the Star Wars universe to include tenets from Taoism, Buddhism, Catholicism and Samurai. Former priest, psychotherapist and writer Mark Vernon finds real power in the Jedi story: "The reason it's so powerful and universal is that we have to find ourselves. It's by losing ourselves and identifying with something greater like the Jedi myth that we find a fuller life."

41 of 268 comments (clear)

  1. Spiritual Needs by JonnyCalcutta · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "For Mark Vernon, a former priest, psychotherapist and writer, says the Jedi story has real power. "The reason it's so powerful and universal is that we have to find ourselves. It's by losing ourselves and identifying with something greater like the Jedi myth that we find a fuller life."

    Speak for yourself

    1. Re:Spiritual Needs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It seems to me that people without a strong sense of identity are finding something to give them one.

    2. Re:Spiritual Needs by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Religion gives people who need a purpose in their life one. Some people find one without religion, others are happy without one. But then there's those that need one, can't find one themselves and for them, religion may well fill that void. That's fine and ok, as long as they leave me out of it, and that includes leaving the tenets of their imaginary friend out of anything that may affect me, be it education, legislation or noise in the form of people screaming I should go to prayer or bells ringing in my ears.

      In other words, faith is something lovely, just don't make a religion out of it.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re: Spiritual Needs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It seems to me that part of the attraction of the Jedi story is the juvenile need to identify with a master breed, individuals with semi-magical capabilities beyond those of the general population. It's psychologically understandable in some 14 year old trying to find his personal identity, but sad in an adult.

    4. Re:Spiritual Needs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ... faith is something lovely ...

      Faith, in the religious sense, is the belief in something without evidence, and the preservation of that belief in the face of contradictory evidence. Some very smart people have faith in a religion and are completely aware that their beliefs have no evidence to back them up, but still believe and act as though they're true. Whether they're right or wrong about the religion is irrelevant, the fact that they're willing to believe it without evidence is problematic – not lovely.

      You'll find it quite difficult to find a religious person who doesn't allow their religion to influence the way they act when they have a choice in something to do with education or legislation. There might be a few smart ones around here, but the overwhelming majority will take the words of their religious leaders very seriously and attempt to promote those. It's not fine to allow those people to promote those views without backing them up like the rest of us must.

      Faith without evidence is toxic, faith with evidence isn't faith.

    5. Re:Spiritual Needs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I dare you to cite at least one solid example that should put me startled into place for assuming otherwise. Otherwise, you're just another one of those holier-than-thou folks with nothing to show for it.

    6. Re:Spiritual Needs by ThePhilips · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Faith without evidence is toxic, faith with evidence isn't faith.

      That makes sense only with this prepended:

      Faith, in the religious sense,

      But I feel you put those two far too apart.

      Faith is something all people have naturally. People just have it.

      Religion is simply a parasite which attaches to it. And that can make the faith toxic.

      --
      All hope abandon ye who enter here.
    7. Re: Spiritual Needs by mrbester · · Score: 2

      You're advocating violence to "educate" and show superiority? Once you start down the path to the Dark Side, yada yada...

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    8. Re:Spiritual Needs by capedgirardeau · · Score: 2

      Faith without evidence is not always toxic. It depends on what that faith is in. Point to me a devout Buddhist who is somehow toxic. or one who has ever existed.

      http://time.com/3090990/how-an...

      --
      Wax on, wax off baby!
    9. Re: Spiritual Needs by peragrin · · Score: 2

      It seems to me that part of the attraction of the Christian story is the juvenile need to identify with a master breed, individual with semi-magical capabilities beyond those of the general population. It's psychologically understandable in some 14 year old trying to find his personal identity, but sad in an adult.

      You can replace Christian with Muslim and it still works too.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    10. Re:Spiritual Needs by cerberusss · · Score: 2

      It seems to me that people without a strong sense of identity are finding something to give them one.

      Even those with a strong sense of identity sometimes need comfort, or vent a bit, or be thankful etc.

      Personally I pray to the classic Greek pantheon. Of course I know it's not real. But it's as good a way as any. So I thank Hera for the fact that I've got a healthy daughter, and I thank Hephaestus for a good day's work.

      I don't give a shit that it's all imaginary. Thanks to science, I know that thankfulness and praying is proven to make people happier. And unfortunately, with my normal mood naturally below average, I do a lot of exercises like that.

      Fact sheet positive psychology (PDF)

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    11. Re:Spiritual Needs by Oligonicella · · Score: 2

      The problem with religion has nothing at all to do with faith - for the most part it has to do with monotheism and the dogma around it, most notably the Abrahamic religions. All of the violence and wars throughout history caused by religion have a direct connection to monotheism because these religions invariably have as part of their dogma that there is only one true religion and it is ours.

      This shows an abysmal ignorance of religions in history. There is no religion that has been immune from the human activities of war or intolerance. Monotheism in and of itself is also not the problem. Examine any pantheon and tell me; did you find what is called a god/godess of war? Would that convince you? My guess is no. You would simply claim other motivations for them such as economic that you would preclude for a monotheistic. War is about subjugation, religion is just one tool.

    12. Re:Spiritual Needs by Livius · · Score: 2

      So, it's as real as any other religion.

  2. Serious Religion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As if there were one :P

    1. Re:Serious Religion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh no, many of them are serious. That's the real problem.

    2. Re:Serious Religion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Millions of people have been murdered in the name of religions.
      Millions of people have been brain washed in the name of religions.
      Millions of people have had their freedom to think what they want, feel what they want, or express what they want in the name of religions.
      Most modern governments enforce law that is heavily based on religious roots within their history.

      You may not think it's serious, but the entire world around you has been shaped by these religions, as sad and terrifying as it is.

  3. is it worth the effort ? by Selur · · Score: 2

    390,127 Brits declared their religion as Jediism
      vs.
    at least 2,000 of them are "genuine,"

    doesn't the difference seem a bit high ?

    If they assume that roughly 0.5% of the answers are genuine, I wonder what they think about other statements from that census.
    If you have to assume that less than a percent of the answers are genuine the whole thing doesn't really seem to be worth the effort.
    (or the goal of the census was quite a different one than one would suspect)

    1. Re:is it worth the effort ? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 2

      You can probably find 2000 people that declare Kermit the Frog to be their personal savior.

      As it happens, Miss Piggy and Yoda are both the puppets of Frank Oz.

  4. Use the force? by kopolov · · Score: 2

    I wonder if when you rank high enough in the church, you can jump start your car using "the force".

  5. Midichlorians by khasim · · Score: 4, Funny

    Good luck with your Midichlorian count.

    Or is he Orthodox Jedi? I think they reject the prequels as heresy.

    Or is that Reformed Jedi?

  6. Stop it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Neither is Scientology a church nor are they are a religion or serious. They are a serious criminal company having bullied IRS to conduct their enslaving scam tax free.

  7. Samurai were people by kruach+aum · · Score: 2

    not a belief system. Some followed "the way of the samurai" (really neo-confuscianism), and others were (zen) buddhist or shinto adherents, often at the same time.

  8. Re:What do you mean? by quenda · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't be offended. Lots of religions start out as jokes or satire, before inexplicably being taken seriously.
    If you ever read the Book of Mormon, or Dianetics, you will see what I mean.

    It could be time to re-label those E-Meters as midichlorian meters, and make a fortune.

  9. Slashdotism . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2
    1. Declare your abode to be a Royal Temple of the Seriously Slashdotted
    2. Slip through the same tax loopholes that other religions do
    3. Profit!
    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  10. Re:Worked for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Buddhism has no mythical or spiritual component. Buddhism is about discovering and accepting what is real.

    According to some westerners who got their hands on Buddhist texts in the last century and decided to cut out what made them uncomfortable. Within the Buddhist tradition, some supernatural element has always been present, even among schools that downplayed anything but direct experience. The Mahayana Buddhism most successful among westerners inherited the entire Vedic pantheon, and in Avatamsakasutra, for example, Buddha ascended to Mt. Sumeru to chat with Indra and his buddies. Furthermore, in the Mahayana tradition the boddhisatva ideal remains, but belief in people who choose to stay in the cycle of rebirths until all sentient beings have been liberated requires that one believe in a cycle of rebirths, which is not supported by science in any way, shape or form.

  11. Re:Worked for me. by narcc · · Score: 5, Informative

    Most Buddhists would strongly disagree with you.

  12. at least 2,000 of them are "genuine," by rossdee · · Score: 2

    Have they demonstrated the power of the force at all? or are they just genuine nutters?

    1. Re:at least 2,000 of them are "genuine," by damn_registrars · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Have they demonstrated the power of the force at all? or are they just genuine nutters?

      Couldn't you ask the same question of all other religions since the dawn of time, and reach the same conclusion?

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  13. Wars of religion . . . by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Declare your abode to be a Royal Temple of the Seriously Slashdotted
    2. Slip through the same tax loopholes that other religions do
    3. Profit!

    Nah, Slashdot is not a religion. But you could for example choose one of the many religions organizations represented on Slashdot like: the Sacred Temple of the Apple, the Revered and Holy Shrine of the Android, the Evangelical Church of Emacs, the First Reformed Church of Vim, the Orthodox Church of WIndows or the Open Source Church of the Blessed Saint Linux on the Desktop ... the list goes on ... those are already established religions. Slashdot is more like the plains of Armageddon where the adherents of these faiths fight their wars of religion.

    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
  14. Jedi is not an "ism" by brunes69 · · Score: 2

    The proper name is "Jedi". It is both the name of one who practices the religion as well as the religion itself.

    "I studied Jedi at a Jedi Institute, to work towards becoming a Jedi"

    1. Re:Jedi is not an "ism" by Livius · · Score: 2

      The difference is that that "Jedi" was entirely fictional.

      Oh, wait,....

  15. Enough believers for a schism? by dltaylor · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are the jedists a large enough group to start killing each other over the "Old Testament" (episodes 4, 5, 6) vs. "New Testament" (episodes 1, 2, 3, with the midichlorians)?

  16. Re:What do you mean? by flyneye · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Subgenius Foundation, is SERIOUSLY the only hope you pink nerdlings have of avoiding the Stark Fist of Removal, becoming a God of your own pleasure planet, and having unlimited SLACK! http://www.subgenius.com/
    We are the ONLY religion to offer salvation for only $35 U.S. or DOUBLE YOUR MONEY BACK! http://www.subgenius.com/scata...
    You get:
              Pamphlets #1 & 2
    Your Own Personal 8x11 suitable-for-framing DOBBSHEAD
    Official Dobbshead/Church Logo Metal Pin
    Dobbshead Sticker, Bumper Sticker
    The SubGenius Pledge
    The Divine Excuse (signed by "Bob"!)
    (WHAT OTHER RELIGIONS CHARGE ALL WORLDLY GOODS FOR!!!)
    Doktorate of Forbidden Sciences
    (be a Doktor INSTANTLY. Incredible, sinister super-miniaturized fine print details all the scores of Church Ranks and Titles from which YOU can CHOOSE. Signed by... "Bob")
    Propaganda flyers to copy, Stickers
    Wallet sized, SubGenius MINISTER'S CARD
    (Without that card you have NO HOPE on July 5th!!!)
    Minister's Ordination papers and instructions.
    The STARK FIST of Removal online / SCRUBGENIUS secret forum
    (they're full of rants, art, Prescriptures, doctrine, charts, filth, comics, reviews and CHURCH NEWS & CONTACTS)

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  17. Re:What do you mean? by cmdr_tofu · · Score: 2

    Praise BOB!

  18. Re:Worked for me. by oobayly · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Most Buddhists would strongly disagree with you.

    But they won't kill you over it.

    Or more accurately, like most other religious followers, the majority of Buddhists won't kill you for it. Like every religion, it has followers who are willing to kill for their beliefs - Special Report: Buddhist monks incite Muslim killings in Myanmar

  19. Re:What do you mean? by aevan · · Score: 2

    It's only starting out. Wait until they come to your house and kidnap your children to help them 'realise their potential'.

    Then the next thing you know they are assassinating political leaders in their chambers all because one of the neophytes 'had an uneasy feeling'.

    As on of their prophets said: 'Not afraid? You will be. You *will* be'

  20. Re:Stop Validating Scientology! by Oligonicella · · Score: 2

    Mormanism begs to differ.

  21. Retards by mveloso · · Score: 2

    The Jedi were, in the end, a bunch of idiots who were so blind that they (1) didn't notice they were spending billions of credits a year building a clone army, (2) didn't realize, even after some kid mentioned it to yoda, that all their systems were compromised, and (3) were so bad at tactics that they dropped 100% of their forces into - some dumb arena to fight someone.

    Their last practitioner, Obi-Wan, left his best friend to die after cutting off both of his arms and his legs, and spent the rest of his life as a trapdoor spider waiting to turn his best friend's son into a weapon pointed at his old friend.

    Why would anyone want to be like these yo-yos?

  22. Cut the crap, this is not insightful by s.petry · · Score: 2

    [rant on] It really gets tiresome reading the same drivel over and over and seeing it marked as "insightful" when it is simply repeating statements that are provably false. It's like watching the KKK guys all pat each other on the back for using a racial slur, it's old and pathetic. [rant off]

    Consider Pascal's wager. Even if there is no God, what is the harm in society practicing Christian beliefs? Thou shalt not kill, thou shalt not steal, thou shalt not covet they neighbors wife or property.

    7 out of 10 commandments are exactly what we call "Natural Law". The other 3 deal with respecting the God that provided those commandments, which is interestingly a circular logic bit to make sure that people continue to respect the 10 commandments. Wow, there is absolutely nothing parasitic with the beliefs, and there is nothing toxic with the beliefs.

    People in power have used religion to manipulate people, but that's not a problem of religion it's a problem of people abusing a system for power. You know, the same abuse that we have with people in political offices, loaning money and exchanging money, owning/controlling land and resources, etc.. etc.. etc.. They can do this because people are ignorant and believe what they are told, even when you can prove their belief wrong. (I really hope that rings a bell for you)

    Claiming that Religion is a problem does not fix the issue, education fixes the issue. There is a 50/50 chance that the Universe needs something to create it (I really hope you are not one of those that claims science solved the question, which is another false statement often repeated). This is why a large number of scientifically minded people have at least some faith in some religion. At the same time, the educated can easily pick out the nonsense that people add, or have added to a Religion for gaining power. I have yet to see a crowd of PHDs or Nuclear Physicists run off and join Al Quada or ISIL/ISIS at any rate, go ahead and prove me wrong.

    Instead of telling people that Religion is something it's not, why not teach them what their Religion really is? I fully agree that it's an uphill battle, entrenched power is extremely problematic to remove. Trying to counter lies with lies is a no win proposition.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:Cut the crap, this is not insightful by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 2

      Consider Pascal's wager. Even if there is no God, what is the harm in society practicing Christian beliefs?

      What if the is a god, but not a Christian God?

      Pascal's Wager only works if there isn't a god. If there is a god, but you pick the wrong religion, you're just as boned as if you simply don't believe. If multiple religions claim to be True, and none can offer real evidence, logically you should believe in none of them.

      Hell, even if it is the God of the Christian bible, but the stuff that Christian ignore in the OT really are important (Suffer not a witch to live, shellfish is an abomination, if a farmer mixes two types of crop he is to be stoned to death, do not take the Lord's name in vain.. etc etc.)

      I really hope you are not one of those that claims science solved the question

      There are many literal claims made by many religions, in regard to Creation or their own subsequent history, which have been shown to be false.

      For example, in the Christian (and Hebrew) bible: We know that young Earth creationist interpretation of Genesis is not possible. We know that not just the date, but even the pattern of creation is Genesis isn't what happened. We know that there is no sign of the events in Exodus (not the ten plagues, nor the escaping slaves, nor the Red Sea parting) in spite the Egyptians meticulously recording other such events (plagues, escaping slaves, weird events). Likewise the slaughter of the First Born in Jesus' time. We know that many of the battles in the bible didn't happen or couldn't have happened as written (the "Walls" of Jericho, for example). We know Jerusalem at the supposed time of David was a goat-village, not a major power as claimed. We know that much of the OT was not written when it was claimed, and can't go back beyond 800-900BC (and probably dates to around 700BC), due to references not matching actual history. (Even small things, like the foundation story of Abraham having pack-camels, which weren't domesticated until before 1000BC.)

      Essentially whenever religions make factual, testable claims, they almost always turn out to be false. (So often, in fact, that finding a true claim in a religion or myth is really interesting and unusual.)

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  23. From who's perspective? by s.petry · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Mormons and COS were both intended as money making operations to gain power. Hubbard wrote several papers before Dianetics stating that the easiest way to get rich was to start a religion, so he did. To them it was not a joke or satire, it was about money and domination. The story of Mormon religion is similar, but harder to track and requires reading lots of anecdotal evidence.

    The masses looking at the founders of these religions for the most part laughed and snickered, but as PT Barnum is attributed with saying "a sucker is born every minute" (re-read that statement before trying to correct the quote)

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.