Slashdot Mirror


Verizon Launches Tech News Site That Bans Stories On US Spying

blottsie writes: The most-valuable, second-richest telecommunications company in the world is bankrolling a technology news site called SugarString.com. The publication, which is now hiring its first full-time editors and reporters, is meant to rival major tech websites like Wired and the Verge while bringing in a potentially giant mainstream audience to beat those competitors at their own game.

There's just one catch: In exchange for the major corporate backing, tech reporters at SugarString are expressly forbidden from writing about American spying or net neutrality around the world, two of the biggest issues in tech and politics today.

12 of 145 comments (clear)

  1. That's pathetic by dciman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Talk about a straw man.

    "Mainstream" tech sites are bad enough already.

  2. And? by pla · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And I care about one more crappy corporate-controlled portal site why? Other than the "will they set up a GeoCities page next"-esque shock-value that any company in 2014 still believes their customers give the least damn about their ISP's home page, of course.

    If Verizon doesn't want news about the ways the intelligence community and Verizon conspire to rape us all, hey, their portal. And if I want actual news, hey, not their portal. It all balances out.

  3. Net Neutrality Case-In-Point by Bob9113 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In exchange for the major corporate backing, tech reporters at SugarString are expressly forbidden from writing about American spying or net neutrality around the world, two of the biggest issues in tech and politics today.

    You gotta admire the chutzpah. Even as they are saying to the FCC that they can be trusted with the authority to be the gatekeepers of the Internet, they put on a public display of their intent to inhibit public policy debate on the very issue of Net Neutrality itself.

    The extraordinary lack of self-consciousness is difficult to fathom. It rises to the level of, "Let them eat cake."

  4. It's not a news site by NotDrWho · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The most-valuable, second-richest telecommunications company in the world is bankrolling a technology propaganda site called SugarString.com

    FTFY

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  5. Re:"there are no comments" by JMJimmy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's the perfect example of why those who distribute media/news should never have been allowed to be the same ones who create the media/news.

  6. Re:Random companies entering the news business by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It sort of us. It's not very revenue-rich, but there's a lot of value to your typical business in being able to officially publish things that help shape discussion. I wouldn't be surprised if most newspapers moved to operating at a (smallish) loss, owned by people from outside industries by the end of the decade.

  7. Re:No spy stories or net neutrality stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That is like making a crime website but not reporting on murders and robberies that the company committed.

    FTFY

  8. Re:Random companies entering the news business by michrech · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Until we all have extremely high-speed internet connections in our homes, the local HDD will not be obsolete. As that isn't happening anytime soon (in the US, at least), I don't think Seagate / WD have anything to worry about.

    --
    bork bork bork!
  9. Why is this bad? by MobyDisk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    These are issues that Verizon cannot be neutral on, so it makes perfect ethical sense for them to recuse themselves from discussing such topics. Don't lambast them for it.

    The real questions here are:
    1) Who are the backers and why did they stipulate this requirement?
    2) Why is Verizon starting a news & pop culture site in a time when such sites are prevalent and unprofitable?

    1. Re:Why is this bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course we're going to lambast them on it, hell, I'd hoist them on their own petard as well.

      They cannot open a tech news site and then block 90% of what's really tech news, and in today's society, government spying, corporate spying, corporate thievery, corporate ass-hattery, government agents committing acts of treason are 90% of the tech news.

      Fuck em, they deserve every derisive, contempt filled response they get, and probably more than they get. They deserve to have their entire stack of corporate officers, board of directors and major share-holders spending time in jail for the treasonous acts they've committed.

  10. Meaning by MitchDev · · Score: 4, Insightful

    SugarString.com is USELESS and should be ostracised as a propganda site, NOT a news site.

    In fact, it should be legally barred from calling itself a "news" site.

    1. Re:Meaning by Xyrus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      SugarString.com is USELESS and should be ostracised as a propganda site, NOT a news site.

      In fact, it should be legally barred from calling itself a "news" site.

      Well, if Fox News gets to call itself a "news" site then that's sets a pretty low bar to clear, don't you think?

      --
      ~X~