Slashdot Mirror


China Completes Its First Lunar Return Mission

China's Chang'e 5-T1 mission to the moon has not only taken some beautiful pictures of the Earth from the craft's perspective (hat tip to reader Taco Cowboy) but as of Friday evening (continental U.S. time) returned a capsule to Earth. (The capsule landed in Inner Mongolia.) From the linked article: Prior to re-entering the Earths atmosphere, the unnamed probe was travelling at 11.2 kilometres per second (25,000 miles per hour), a speed that can generate temperatures of more than 1,500 degrees Celsius (2,700 degrees Fahrenheit), the news agency reported. To slow it down, scientists let the craft "bounce" off Earths atmosphere before re-entering again and landing. ... The module would have been 413,000 kilometres from Earth at its furthest point on the mission, SASTIND said at the time. The mission was launched to test technology to be used in the Change-5, Chinas fourth lunar probe, which aims to gather samples from the moons surface and will be launched around 2017, SASTIND previously said.

26 of 109 comments (clear)

  1. same week... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How curious that this comes in the same week the Americans lost two space vehicles in one week.

    The future of space belongs to China. They are the ones with the cajones to do it. They'll be the first manned mission to Mars too because they'll just fucking do it. They won't be crippled with fear and pork.

    China 2014 = USA 1960.

    1. Re:same week... by AchilleTalon · · Score: 2

      Are you awared India has sent a probe orbiting Mars successfully just few weeks ago? Only four nations did it: Russia, USA, European Space Agency and India. Only one succeeded on first trial, India.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
  2. Back to the future by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How curious that this comes in the same week the Americans lost two space vehicles in one week.

    The future of space belongs to China. They are the ones with the cajones to do it. They'll be the first manned mission to Mars too because they'll just fucking do it. They won't be crippled with fear and pork.

    China 2014 = USA 1960.

    Oh shut up. They've managed to do something we did in the 1970's. Good for them, it's not a trivial accomplishment by any means, but it doesn't mean that Taikonauts will be owning near space for the next millennium. I do wish them luck and persistence - somebody needs to kick the US in the kiester and get us 'competing' against something.

    Besides, the Chinese love pork.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    1. Re:Back to the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      China can get humans in to space today... and the USA cannot.

      I think that points to the direction... not what happened 50 years ago.

    2. Re:Back to the future by Spy+Handler · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Taikonauts will be

      Please stop. We don't need to invent a new word every time a different country sends a man into space. What you gonna do in a few decades, memorize 100 different words for "astronaut"?

      Do you say "Angela Merkel is on her way to the summit in a Flugzeug"? "Kim Jung Eun is returning to North Korea in his private Bihenggi? You're talking in English, just use the motherfucking English word for airplane.

    3. Re:Back to the future by x0ra · · Score: 2

      Your analogy would be correct if the US were capable to build Saturn rockets, which is NOT the case. http://amyshirateitel.com/2011...

    4. Re: Back to the future by ZorglubZ · · Score: 2

      And you think that #2, "star traveller", is a better word than #1, "space traveller"? Why?

    5. Re:Back to the future by jandersen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      > China 2014 = USA 1960.

      Oh shut up. They've managed to do something we did in the 1970's.

      Well, he/she does have a point, as you actually manage to say yourself. When the US did this, they were in a massive, economic upturn, as is China now; and we in the West were in the grip of a massive, if somewhat naive, optimism - remember the Hippies? It was in the 60es and 70es that we shook of the post-WWII gloom and started believing that we could achieve anything and everything. Unfortunately we also managed to squander much of it - my personal opinion is that it is consumerism more than anything that's to blame, and unless China reins in a bit, they will too. So it goes in the world, but when that time comes, perhaps we will be ready again.

    6. Re:Back to the future by KeensMustard · · Score: 2

      Aeroplane

    7. Re:Back to the future by peragrin · · Score: 2

      except china isn't building rockets with 1960's tech. they are using modern tech. modern flight systems.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    8. Re:Back to the future by itzly · · Score: 2

      That's nonsense. The USA currently have a number of rockets that can lift more than the Chinese rocket. And the manned/unmanned thing is a matter of policy.

  3. Re:To put into TIME perspective by morgauxo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1972 Last US Moon Landing
    1972 - No one does a damn thing

    Nope, I don't really see any reason to pick on China specifically there.
    At this rate they will be inventing the wheel in about 200 years but good for them because the rest of us will have forgotten how to do even that!

    But don't worry, we still have junk food and reality TV.

  4. Re:Welcome to 1970, China! by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    US has never had an unmanned sample return mission from the moon. Soviets did, though, in the early 70's.

    They can spin it, "US sucks, they have to send up humans because their robots are too dumb."

  5. So much envy from America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just accept that the Chinese will own the 21st century of space exploration, ok. There's no need for your envy, be proud of our achievements as a race and commend China for taking the lead, for all of us.

    And don't bring up the "we did it before you"-bullshit, because the Russians beat ALL OF US going into space. The Russians had crafts in orbit, people in orbit, and landers on the Moon, Venus and Mars, before anyone else. The Russians were the definitive pioneers of space exploration, period.

    1. Re:So much envy from America by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 2

      Yes, maybe we could do something cool like all build a space station together.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    2. Re:So much envy from America by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 2

      And how much has America let China contribute to the space station?

      I'm hoping you're down modded really soon - I wish there was a -1 uninformed mod.

      And Yes, I live in America, and Yes, I think it's stupid to not have all countries that want to share in space exploration actually share.

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    3. Re:So much envy from America by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 2

      The Russians had crafts in orbit, people in orbit, and landers on the Moon, Venus and Mars, before anyone else. The Russians were the definitive pioneers of space exploration, period.

      First Soviet satellite in orbit: Sputnik 1. October 4 1957. Transmitted radio signals for 22 days and burned up on reentry in 92 days.

      First US satellite in orbit: Explorer 1. January 31, 1958. Transmitted data for 111 days and was the first spacecraft to detect the Van Allen belt. remained in orbit until 1970.

      So the Soviet Union sent up a radio transmitter that beeped at 20 and 40 MHz four months sooner than the US. Explorer 1 which had; a Geiger counter, multiple temperature sensors, a transducer and solid state amp to record micrometeorite impacts, and a wire grid for detecting micrometeorite impacts.

      Don't get me wrong. Sputnik 1 was first and a hell of an achievement. However, it's obvious the US could have sent up something sooner if they had wanted to. It's not like you can just develop a space program from scratch in four months. The US had started Project Orbiter in 1954 and was in competition with the Vanguard project, which gained favor politically. So work on Project Orbiter was shelved. Vanguard made an unsuccessful attempt to put Vanguard TV3 in orbit at the end of 1957. Once Sputnik 1 was launched, Project Orbiter was completed in less than 90 days.

      The Soviet Union had five failed mars flyby missions before the US even attempted to send anything to Mars. The US then had one failed flyby before the first successful one by Mariner 4 in 1964. USSR then had three more failures followed by 2 successful US and one failed flyby by the US . Then two more failed USSR flybys before their first successful Mars mission. The Soviet Mars 3 orbiter/Lander sent back 8 months of data and the lander managed to transmit 20 seconds of data. However Mariner 9 successfully achieved orbit around Mars a little over two weeks before that in November 1971.

      The Soviet Luna-2 crashed into the moon in 1959 and didn't do much else. So it was a first. The US crashed Ranger 7 into the moon in early 1965. But it returned 4300 pictures in the process.

      Laika was sent into orbit knowing full well the dog would suffocate. As far as I know, all of the deaths of US launched animals were due to catastrophic mission failures.

      I could go on, but there's not much point. While there was plenty of dick waving during the space race. The Soviet Union tended to get there first by simply lobbing a rock with the Soviet flag painted on it. While most of the US missions tended to actually send back useful data for the first time.

    4. Re:So much envy from America by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 2

      I'm certainly not trying to marginalize the Soviet space missions. Their early moon rovers were fantastic feats. Hell, I don't think there's been a more successful rover program until Spirit and Opportunity.

      But then look at the Voyager probes launched by the US. They've traveled farther than any man made object to date. And depending on your definition, are/will be the first to leave the solar system. Voyager 1 crossed the heliopause a little over 2 years ago. I'm pretty sure that's a first. ;-)

  6. Re:To put into TIME perspective by Luckyo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think we can actually pin the blame on Korolev here. He died in 1966, and without him Soviet space program lost their main driver.

    And without stiff and successful competition he provided, US didn't use the same resources as before on space exploration after clawing their one victory after series of losses. A very smart thing to do considering the costs of the program and the fact that people only remember your last victory, not the string of losses that came before it.

  7. China, mankind's last hope? by EzInKy · · Score: 2

    The rest of the world seems to have become so risk adverse and cost focused that it is very doubtful any significant space exploration will be forthcomming in the near future. Perhaps what little communal pride is left in China will help spur exploration for explorations sake, and not just the pursuit of profit?

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
  8. Re:Welcome to 1970, China! by x0ra · · Score: 4, Interesting

    AFAIK, today, even the US is back to the pre-1970 era. IIRC, NASA has lost knowledge about the Saturn's engine. Even in the nuclear domain, the industrial knowledge on how to produce some critical element of nuclear warhead has been lost.

  9. Re:Welcome to 1970, China! by x0ra · · Score: 2

    Actually, no, it would seem the US were finally able to re-manufacture FOGBANK after 10 years and nearly $100 millions spent. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F...

  10. Good job by phantomfive · · Score: 2

    Go China! A scientific victory for any of us is a scientific victory for all of us. Congratulations and keep up the good work!

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  11. Re:Welcome to 1970, China! by x0ra · · Score: 4, Insightful

    cf. http://amyshirateitel.com/2011...

    If the problem was only economical, there wouldn't be a problem nowadays for a new launch vehicle to go to Mars. The $6 billions NASA budget in 1966 would be equivalent to $43 billions today. Even at FY 2013 budget, $17 billions, assuming the R&D had already been done, documented, and tooling still exist, the saturn launch vehicle could easily be re-made. But strangely, it could not. you are also disproved by the fact the NASA engineer have only been testing the Rocketdyne F-1 engine quite... recently... http://www.nasa.gov/exploratio...

    Let's face it, the US space program is not what it used to be, but hey, if you like to live in the past, good for you :-/

  12. Re:To put into TIME perspective by AchilleTalon · · Score: 2

    Clearly after going to the Moon, someone discovered there is no point anymore to go there. USA proved its superiority as intended when JFK launched the program. The only incentive was national superiority during the Cold War. The rest was pure waste of money and resources.

    Comparison with aviation does not hold water. The aviation industry has proven to be profitable and fast transportation valuable to human activity and economy. No such thing exists for manned missions to the Moon or even Mars. In short, there is no incentive to do it again or even go to Mars, Cold War is over.

    --
    Achille Talon
    Hop!
  13. Re:To put into TIME perspective by itzly · · Score: 2

    Even if they continued the missions, bringing samples from the moon would still be way too expensive to be handing them out to school kids.