Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Minimizing Oil and Gas Dependency In a Central European City?

An anonymous reader writes I live in a big city in central Europe. As most of you know from recent news, most of Europe's (and quite a bit of China's) gas supply comes from Russia and is very likely to be cut off several times during the next few winters (China's time will come in later years). What many might not know is that not just our natural gas supply, but also our petrol ('gas' for the Americans in the audience) often comes partly from Russia and some of our electricity comes from gas powered stations. Most of our leaders, at least in Germany and Hungary, are in bed with the Russians and likely won't do anything about fuel security. I live in an building with a south-facing roof and I own the roof space but I don't have enough land here to put a wind turbine or something similar on. Can anyone make good suggestions for ways to cut down my dependence on unreliable power supplies? Extra points for environmentalism, but I am even willing to pay more to be sure the heating is there in winter and my server keeps running.

250 comments

  1. audience by fisted · · Score: 2

    for the Americans in the audience

    Okay, AC confirmed it. We're an audience after all.
    Shit.

    1. Re:audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL sure... this was clearly written by an european... please Dice stop with the psyops...

    2. Re:audience by kraut · · Score: 0

      Your signature is profoundly disturbing. Citation, please?

      --
      no taxation without representation!
    3. Re:audience by ihtoit · · Score: 1, Informative

      He didn't and here's why:

      sizeof is an operator, not a function, because the ANSI C standard says so.

      As consequences:

      The operand of sizeof can be a bare cast, sizeof (int), instead of an object expression.
      The parentheses are unnecessary: int a; printf("%d\n", sizeof a); is perfectly fine. They're often seen, firstly because they're needed as part of a type cast expression, and secondly because sizeof has very high precedence, so sizeof a + b isn't the same as sizeof (a+b). But they aren't part of the invocation of sizeof, they're part of the operand.
      You can't take the address of sizeof.
      The expression which is the operand of sizeof is not evaluated at runtime (sizeof a++ does not modify a).
      The expression which is the operand of sizeof can have any type except void, or function types. Indeed, that's kind of the point of sizeof.
      A function would differ on all those points. There are probably other differences between a function and a unary operator, but I think that's enough to show why sizeof could not be a function even if there was a reason to want it to be.

      (credit: Steve Jessop at StackOverflow).

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    4. Re:audience by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      He was citing Torvalds, who did indeed make such a claim.

    5. Re:audience by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1

      I'm hesitant to call that a citation. Torvalds wasn't being retarded, as that context-less citation makes him sound. That's more like a political sound-bite

    6. Re:audience by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      no he wasn't, Jessop made that comment I quoted back in 2009.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    7. Re:audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why can't I see the sig? Because I'm not logged in? Why does that make sense?

    8. Re:audience by Lotana · · Score: 1

      Because Slashdot wants to encourage its users to log in.

      Why? Because (Among other things) it makes having actual conversation easier, when you are confident that you are talking to the same person and not constantly changing anonymous person.

    9. Re:audience by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      What does this have to do with some guy at StackOverflow? Here's what the sig says:

      ``But "sizeof()" really *is* a function.'' -- Linus Torvalds

    10. Re:audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a stupid argument. Why would another not-logged-in user want to pretend to be some random AC in a thread?

    11. Re:audience by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      register here for ideas, slashdot seems a strange place to ask the question about fossil fuel dependency http://cleantechnica.com/

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    12. Re:audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read the citation and, while a bit confusing, Linux is right: sizeof is a function. Not a C function mind you, but a function nonetheless (always optimised out at compile time) in the mathematical sense. The fact that the standard allows you to use it without parens is a bit creepy, as Linus goes on to demonstrate.

    13. Re:audience by tepples · · Score: 1

      Probably because Slashdot doesn't want to boost search engine rankings of web pages cited in signatures.

    14. Re:audience by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Dude, seriously, Google ... https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/1...

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  2. trzeba wia z kraju by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a nie robic silownie wiatro-sloneczne.
    Jak zechca zakrecic zawory, to do wjazdu czolgami bedzie malo czasu.

    1. Re:trzeba wia z kraju by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 0

      a nie robic silownie wiatro-sloneczne.
      Jak zechca zakrecic zawory, to do wjazdu czolgami bedzie malo czasu.

      "It's necessary to run away instead of building wind and solar generators. It's too short time from closed valves to tank entry"

      Today Donetsk recited Requiem for 2 boys killed with Ukrainian government shell. And OSCE observers patrol the border and see no tank entry.

      Are you going to produce in your native country so much bloodshed to make external peacemakers necessary?

  3. The number one thing by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Get involved on the government.
    As far as solar goes, pointing the panels WEST means more energy is generated during peak hours; which is more beneficial over all the trapping the maximum light. Winding up power plants to peak use a tremendous amount of power.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:The number one thing by quenda · · Score: 3, Informative

      As far as solar goes,

      OP is asking about Central Europe during winter. Solar is not an option - certainly not for backup.
      Wind turbines are not economical on a small scale, and not reliable enough as a backup.

      Backup power and heating is a common problem with well-know solutions:
      generator, oil or LPG heater with stored fuel, improved insulation.
      Heat needs may be reduced temporarily by covering windows, closing off unused rooms, taping gaps, lowering thermostat.

      The government really should be building nuclear plants, and gas ones that can switch to pulverised coal or oil if needed, with large stockpiles near the site.

    2. Re:The number one thing by knightghost · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Switching back and forth daily to different energy sources more than doubles the capital outlay. Bloody waste of resources.

      Natural Gas, Coal, or Nuclear - nothing else has matured enough, and won't for decades.

    3. Re:The number one thing by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      OP is asking about Central Europe during winter. Solar is not an option - certainly not for backup.
      Wind turbines are not economical on a small scale, and not reliable enough as a backup.

      That's okay, since the Slashdot TOS agreement requires us to recommend nuclear power above all others.

      So to the OP: start working on a fission reactor in your basement. Once you have it running, it will be very cheap and reliable.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    4. Re:The number one thing by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      Can anyone make good suggestions for ways to cut down my dependence on unreliable power supplies?

      Get your power from the electrical grid. Buy a surge protector. Buy a reliable uninterruptible power supply. If you're really paranoid, get an electric generator and keep a stockpile of fuel. If you expect country-wide long-term blackouts, move to a different country.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    5. Re: The number one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try solar concentrator instead of a solar panel. You can make then out of transparent plastic Inside of a sealed box work black screen to collect heat and then pipe it into building with an exhaust fan. In direct sun 200 sq/ft it can put out 15000 Btus per hour for many hours. Also look into a rocket mass heater for an extremely efficient wood stove. Lastly insulate, insulate, insulate.

    6. Re: The number one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also you can use a wood gasifier to run a generator and power your electricity from wood.

    7. Re: The number one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look up solar air heater on youtube. They make them from screen as a heat collector to sofa cans, down spots, aluminum flex tube, etc. You can also make a solar water heater using pcv or coper tubing and painting it black.

    8. Re:The number one thing by rolfwind · · Score: 3, Informative

      Highly disagree, OP sounds like a ripe candidate for solar water, not to be confused with photovoltaics. Solar thermal is highly efficient and pretty cheap in comparison.

      A modest setup would need only three hours a day sun just to supply hot water for daily use, and a bigger setup or more time for supplying hot water for heat (radiant heat using water is extremely common there).

      He's asking for heat and not electricity per se, solar water is ideal for that and many times cheaper than PV for the same results.

    9. Re:The number one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Natural Gas, Coal, or Nuclear - nothing else has matured enough, and won't for decades.

      That's an interesting troll. What do you expect to gain by it?

      Solar energy production was the secondary winner in October, generating an estimated 46% of an average home’s energy needs in Edinburgh, 38% in Inverness, 37% in Glasgow, and 33% in Aberdeen. While those houses fitted with solar hot water panels generated enough energy to meet approximately 41% of the hot water needs of an average home in Edinburgh, 31% in Inverness, 30% in Glasgow, and 27% in Aberdeen.

      However, the real winner was wind generation, which generated a phenomenal 126% of the electricity needs of every home in Scotland!

      http://reneweconomy.com.au/201...

      There have been several instances in recent months when wind energy has accounted for all, or nearly all, electricity demand in South Australia. Last Tuesday, however, set a new benchmark – the combination of wind energy and rooftop solar provided more than 100 per cent of the state’s electricity needs, for a whole working day between 9.30am and 6pm.

      http://reneweconomy.com.au/201...

      The 150-kW storage system that S&C Electric installed at its Chicago headquarters is a model for the future. They needed a working demo to show their customers how they would benefit from energy storage. They can see how you can reconfigure the network if there is an induced fault. There is a small working demo of PJM’s frequency regulation market.

      The move to battery storage is inevitable, and enables the incorporation of much larger amounts of intermittent energy such as wind and solar.

      http://reneweconomy.com.au/201...

      Salvador is also the largest merchant solar plant to be completed in the world, which means that the plant holds no power purchase agreement and sells the electricity it generates on the spot market. This is a business model which Chile is leading due to a combination of conditions including high spot prices for electricity in certain nodes in the nation’s Central Grid (SIC), where Project Salvador is located. SunPower CEO Tom Werner has said that he sees room for more merchant projects in Chile, and expects the model to spread to other nations. “Think of it as the beginning of a trend that we are going to see in the rest of the world,” Werner told pv magazine.

      http://reneweconomy.com.au/201...

    10. Re:The number one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wanna see you do solar water as the backbone of all energy supply needs in a multistory apartment high rise, where everyone owns a tiny area of the roof. It just ain't gonna happen buddy.

      From TFP: " I live in an building with a south-facing roof and I own the roof space".

      Your comment is correct but irrelevant.

      Your comment on old oil burning stoves is relevant but is somewhat hard to read as you bury it in a wall of text. Paragraph breaks are cheap while my time is expensive. If you had anything else to say, I missed it.

    11. Re:The number one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pfff..

      As someone who actually lives in area where temperetures dip to "hell is freezing" scale I'd say parent is partially right, but please consider some specifics.

      Solar, wind, and those kinds are straight out. Wind because of scale, solar because of winter, which can make the output dip close to zero if it's very dark and snowy. If money isn't a problem solar panes will work nicely about 8-9 months (assumed, don't know how high on the mountain you live). If you have access to water with height difference a small water turbine is a possibility. Requires some maintanance, and most likely costs a lot. So most likely this is also straight out of the question.

      What we are left with is burning stuff, as nuclear power in home, or even town size is kinda out of the reach. (not technically, but I imagine it would just not be politically possible). A big ass UPS with diesel generator backup for electricity. Pellets or oil for hot water (hot water circulation as a heat source for house). Wood fireplace for more direct warming (assuming wood for burining is available. There are heat reserving stoves available. If constructed right you don't have to wake up in the middle of the night to add wood). Oil is the easiest and most tried out technology. It's used for home heating in millions of houses in cold climates. Get a big enough tank to last through the winter. If you live in an area where oil burners aren't generally available get a spare one, and know how to replace and maintain it. IF your house doesn't have a circulating water heating system you pretty much need it with oil.

      This brings me to that "extra insulation". Don't seal of your house or you will soon have mold problems. The house needs to be built for cold climates. It's possible to build very energy efficient houses, but randomly sealing things will most likely cause huge problems in the long run because the house needs vents. Also, do not let any room with water pipes drop below freezing point. That WILL break the pipes. If you have extra room you don't need it's a smart idea to let them drop a bit lower (10 degrees) and keep the doors to them closed. If you let them drop too low, and especially if you repeatedly heat them back up quickly, the structures won't like it. There is no need to cover windows if you already have good ones. (triple or quad glas. Every new house in cold climates have these. At summer they keep the heat out). If you build a zero energy house remember to take care the air still changes. This is usually done with AC units with heat exchangers so they don't blow cold air in and warn air out. They need constant electricity though, and need some yearly maintenance.

    12. Re:The number one thing by bigtreeman · · Score: 1

      got your own solar water heater ??
      No they're not very good for the area a standard solar water heater uses
      and they often need a gas or electric boost to make the shower nice and toasty.
      We're in Brisbane with an abundance of sunshine, still need boost.
      Hang on are you talking solar thermal power storage, the molten salt stuff, don't think so, they're industrial sized.
      I've looked at water distillation/purification and it takes a reasonable area to give a good quantity of water.
      http://www.fcubed.com.au/
      We've got some solar voltaics but you need a large array to make a decent amount of power,
      no way is it free energy.

      Go for the wind power, get some batteries, check out Edison batteries, NiFe, made in China, run some of your devices with DC - lighting, computer(s), audio, etc, collect farts to run a generator.

      The best way to heat is good thermal building design, insulation and thermal mass collecting solar energy.
      Sell up and move down under or just suck it up.

      --
      Go well
    13. Re:The number one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The government really should be building nuclear plants, and gas ones that can switch to pulverised coal or oil if needed, with large stockpiles near the site.

      Go nuclear. As side benefit you got "free plutonium" which may be handy "at some point of time".

    14. Re:The number one thing by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 1

      One midterm solution that Munich helped pioneer is to have central heating on a large scale. The city's power plant got rid of its cooling pools, and instead pipes the water heated by generating electricity into homes. The city has bee pretty successful in expanding the network so much that the electricity plants have slowly moved from heat being the by-product to electricity being the by-product to the demand for hot water and warm radiators now a driving force. Oh, and it is popular in the city also because it cut down on soot so much.

      But that is more of a centralised solution. In your case, the two things you might look into are personal electrical turbines (yes, they are coming on to the market) as well as a modern wood oven. The thing about wood ovens is they are less efficient as wood just isn't that efficient a fuel, but the psychological effect of a wood fire is that it just feels warmer.

      The suggestions others make about a water-based solar heating system is also worth noting, as they are really cheap to make yourself. The main issue here is planning, as the water reservoir that you are heating needs space, the pipes have to be laid (though you might be able to use your current radiator network), but it is a good way to at least augment your solution.

    15. Re:The number one thing by AGMW · · Score: 1
      You can get central heating boilers (I've certainly seen gas fired ones in the UK) that are actually mini-generators, the heat almost being a bi-product of the electricity generation. More pricey than the normal boilers but an interesting technology.

      If you can setup your roof solar panels (be they solar thermal or solar PV) to follow the sun that should increase efficiency, but it might be marginal. I've also seen a lens system fitted over a solar panel that concentrates the solar radiation.

      Next is to try and cut down on your power usage ... LED lights have come on in leaps and bounds over the last five years and greatly reduce your power consumption, though they are not cheap to buy. The upside is that they are supposed to last a LOT longer.

      Air-to-Air heat exchangers might be an option too, and certainly using heat exchangers to try and not flush your heat out might be worth a look.
      EG when you have a shower the water that goes down the plughole is only a handful of degrees cooler than when it came out the shower head. Could you use a heat exchanger to take heat from the 'waste' water and pre-heat water going into your hot water cylinder?
      EG If you run a clothes dryer, are you venting the air directly? Could you run that through a heat exchanger to pre-heat fresh air coming in?

      --
      Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
      handmadehands.co.uk
    16. Re:The number one thing by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      just buy nuclear energy from france then.

      if by central europe he means swizerland or germany, then fuck it, just let the state handle it...

      it's pretty damn unlikely that they don't find petrol for sale and germany can just burn it's own coal for heat and electricity.

      or he could spend enermous amounts of money for setting up a steam boiler and generator or an aggregator that can use woodgas - which is fine if he happens to have unlimited amount of firewood to burn but environmentally pointless and likely to cost much more - so this solution only applies to few.

      because really, if your scenario would be running out of petrol or gas then what the friggin point is in the long term backup being gas + petrol? seriously. fortunately it's extremely unlikely his state cannot provide both, on the expense that due to increased taxing he will have to eat one big mac meal less in a week.

      unless he is in Romania I suppose.

      short term it's like this: your state would just burn more coal.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    17. Re:The number one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you do solar water in places where the temperature goes to -20 at night?

    18. Re:The number one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Solar water heating is nice, but there isn't 3 hours of sun per day in the winter in central Europe as far as I can see.

    19. Re:The number one thing by holmstar · · Score: 1

      Pure water isn't run through the collector. They use a mix of water and glycol. It's also common to allow the fluid to empty out of the collector at night, to reduce heat loss.

    20. Re:The number one thing by tepples · · Score: 1

      So how should the majority of people go about arranging their lives to match the situation of the OP, where they can afford to own a "building with a south-facing roof"?

    21. Re:The number one thing by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      Last time I bought batteries for UPS I spent about 8000 roubles (About $200 that time) 85Ah 24V (2kWh). And it was a discounted price! The SLA batteries last about 1000 cycles. It means that storage of every kWh costs about 4 roubles (10 cents that time). Grid power costs here 0.84 roubles - about 2 cents per kWh, 5 times less, but it's quite unique place of Russia. More typical price in Russia is about 3 roubles per kWh ($0.75).

      Other battery technologies available are even more pricey.

      What does it mean? If you have gratis solar panels your electric bill will still be higher than grid due to storage costs.

      The article you quote states that the batteries are used for stabilization of network frequency. It's absolutely different mode requiring no regular full charge and discharge.

      There ARE some new technologies for cheap energy storage, including NaS, Vanadium and Uranium flow batteries etc, but the ordinary European consumer cannot buy them.

    22. Re:The number one thing by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      This brings me to that "extra insulation". Don't seal of your house or you will soon have mold problems.

      1. Correctly installed heat insulation should contain a vapor insulation on warm side.
      2. If you burn anything your stove sucks in enough cold air from outside to make an overventilation with cold air running from every hole, every door, every wall plug defeating all your heat insulation. 50 cubical meters of air are necessary to burn every 10 kg of firewood and they will be necessarily sucked in. You should supply it with cold air directly from outside to prevent it.

    23. Re:The number one thing by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Heating oil fed, circulating hot air systems are available. I live in a house with such a system.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    24. Re:The number one thing by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      That would depend on whether your peak hours are the same as other peoples (not guaranteed). And the efficiency of solar cells is unlikely to be constant across different temperatures, so you'd need to check their specifications on whether they're more efficient in the cool of the morning, or the (relative) warmth of the afternoon. Even if that relative warmth is still in negative figures.

      AIU the original question, a significant part of the power drain from the PV was expected to be for powering the server (regardless of whether the internet connection stayed up in a blackout).

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    25. Re:The number one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, it's me again, under username sillybilly, I'm out of karma and I have to post as Anonymous Coward in the land of the free and home of the brave. So the day before yesterday I had to go downstairs, and noticed the air getting cold, but the thermostat/furnace not working. It's not frost time yet, but last year I had two pipefreeze incidents, even while heating my apartment, but the landlord only heating the basement and 1st floor, and expecting the heat to rise to the 2nd, because he does not want to pay the $25 connection fee to the gas company for the 2nd floor furnace connections (fucking utility company mandatory bullshit basic account connection fees cause all kinds of pipe break damage this way, where is the government regulating the bullshit like that by natural monopolies?,) so even if I heat on the 3rd floor, my heat rises up and it's insanely hot at my head level while my feet are freezing, and the water pipes laying near the floor level and the ceiling level of the 2nd floor still gets frozen. So the day before yesterday I had this idea of shutting the water off completely, and leaving the downstairs furnaces off just like the landlord has them for now, because he has not been able to get a tenant since July last year, and property tax is so friggin high because of public education, that he can't make any money on me alone, of course he makes a killing when he rents at least one of the downstairs apartments, for years on, against which times like this pile on, especially when anyone not on welfare can take their money and for the same thing he can get an apartment where I get my UPS mailbox, in the good neighborhood 20 minutes east from here, so why would they rent over here for that kind of price, and even rent buildings 1 minute north from here asking for 200 less per month than he's asking are getting demolished over lack of tenants, it's like welfare paid housing is a necessity to make it in the landlord business, because charging half for rent is not an option, because property tax is so high, and that would set loose the drop in housing prices that Da Man and everyone in the landlording business has been investing extreme effort to keep high, even in face of economic necessities, they'd rather see housing go to waste and demolished than allow market prices to drop in places they still get a lot from, so there is this running with head against the wall situation going on instead of adapting to realities. If they bring back $25/hr union jobs nobody would have a problem paying 150% for rent that he's asking for downstairs from me, but with the present wages the market would only be willing to pay 50-70%, else there are better options in better neighborhoods, except those neighborhoods don't accept welfare paid tenants, to keep their neighborhood better. So I had this idea to leave the furnaces in the basement off (I have my own furnace on the 3rd floor, there was no good way to pipe up the heat the mod the finished attic into force air heat, compared to just sticking the furnace in here, and I really like the furnace being here, however I dislike all the hot air it sends wastefully into the chimney, but I'm not allowed to touch it, for one, because it's a forced draft thing where too much draft can kill the flame, not enough cause soothing and bad burning, and it may have taken a while to get it just right, and even if I extended the exhaust pipes by breaking into them, letting the air to the chimney go about the house a bit, before sending it u-turn back towards the chimney, even that might de-tune it, but I don't think so. So I had this idea of leaving the heat off completely downstairs, shutting the main water inlet below the frost line, and just bucketing up the water to the 3rd floor as I need it - I buy distilled water at $1.39 for 2 gallons including two clear polyethylene gallon jugs, because the tap water makes me sick, it's good for washing, flushing the toilet and showering, but not cooking or drinking - so I could bucket the water up and only turn on the water supply when I shower, which ha

  4. drill for oil and frack your land by alen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    that's what the USA does. most of our oil is from right here and canada

    1. Re:drill for oil and frack your land by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Europe isn't going to get cut off this winter — at least not for more than a symbolic period of time. Putin is dealing with sanctions and low oil/gas prices and his oligarchs are getting angry; he and they need what oil/gas revenue they can get, so they won't be eager to cut off paying customers. Also, European leaders aren't entirely oblivious to their vulnerability and have been stockpiling fuel since summer, so there should be some margin for error.

      The future? Yeah, Europe needs to elect some grownups and develop traditional energy sources independent of the perpetual Russian kleptocracy. Nothing will mess up the green agenda faster than millions of first world voters shivering through winter because of uncompromising greentards.

    2. Re:drill for oil and frack your land by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Europe doesn't have much locally drillable oil resources, as for fracking, it's a sensitive subject which splits population right in half.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    3. Re:drill for oil and frack your land by AmigaUser8 · · Score: 0

      Europe doesn't have much locally drillable oil resources, as for fracking, it's a sensitive subject which splits population right in half.

      I know some people don't like fracking, but i haven't seen a single person split in half!!

    4. Re:drill for oil and frack your land by PapayaSF · · Score: 1

      that's what the USA does. most of our oil is from right here and canada

      In the USA, landowners generally own the subsurface mineral rights to their land, but in Europe, often it's the government that owns those rights. This makes it easier to stop oil or gas projects than to start them.

      --
      Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
    5. Re:drill for oil and frack your land by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      In europe we 'frack' since roughly 1950 ... no one cares.
      I doubt however there is much left to frack.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    6. Re:drill for oil and frack your land by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In general, civilized Europe is very poor in hydrocarbons, except the northern tip of Scotland. E.g. there isn't any liquid oil under Central Europe by now. The little that was there, for example in Zala county, Hungary, has been sucked totally dry by the Third Reich, after they lost access to romanian oil fields due to soviet red army advances at the end of WW2.
      (The adolfists were so desperate for any car fuel, they even invented a chemical method to convert strip-mined brown coal into diesel. It's called the Fischer-Trops process, highly uneffiecient and needs a factory the size of a small city. The infamous V-2 missiles hitting London were powered by O2 + potato fermented alcohol, taking away about 3/4rd of the Reich's yearly potato produce from the food chain. That's because a lack of oil. When the victorious USSR prized a few dozen V-2s, mongoloid soldiers started drinking the propellant, as the V2 was a 12 cubic meter vodka barrel for them. Thereby russians promptly converted the vehicle to kerosene burners and called them SCUD.)

      There is still a little natural gas left under Hungary, but the output of wells is only enough to provide about 15% of the baseline needs. The rest flows from rasPutin's back orifice via a Cold War era pipeline called "Peace and Friendship II".

    7. Re:drill for oil and frack your land by khallow · · Score: 1

      In europe we 'frack' since roughly 1950 ... no one cares.
      I doubt however there is much left to frack.

      Depends what is there. The current approach though is new and was first put in use some point in the 90s with wide scale use in the US some point after 2000. So it doesn't matter what fracking methods were used in the 50s.

      I have heard that there are fields in Europe which can be exploited with the new methods.

    8. Re:drill for oil and frack your land by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't have the water to use, and they probably care a little more about pollution than the average American. It would be nice if more people cared about the damage fracking does.

      And the land is different. That is why China can't frack yet. Hopefully it won't be economical to develop the techniques needed and they all go bankrupt.

    9. Re:drill for oil and frack your land by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      that's what the USA does. most of our oil is from right here and canada

      References?

      I have trouble believing that 'most' of the oil and byproducts thereof consumed in the US is domestically (including CA if you want) sourced.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    10. Re:drill for oil and frack your land by EdwardFurlong · · Score: 1

      http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/...
      Net imports accounted for 40% of the petroleum consumed in the United States, the lowest annual average since 1991.
      The top five source countries of U.S. petroleum imports in 2012 were Canada, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, Venezuela, and Russia.

    11. Re:drill for oil and frack your land by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pe...

      here is a breakdown by country. for example all of opec countries give us 3.700 TBPD canada alone gives us 3.100 TBPD (there is no US so im unaware of our own internal production that we keep vs exporting)

      All imports are 9.700 TBPD and 2/3rds of that is non opec (makes you wonder why open dictates the price of oil here as much as it does)

      TBPD = thousand barrels per day

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    12. Re:drill for oil and frack your land by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      it's a sensitive subject which splits population right in half.

      More like a 80:20% split in my experience. Those who understand the technology (mostly by working in the oil drilling industry, or knowing people who work in the industry and caring to ask detailed questions) make up the 20% who are unconcerned by the question. The 80% who get their news from "Gas Land" and Greenpeace, are convinced that fracking will kill them and rape their dog.

      In areas where there are fewer drilling specialists, then it's likely to be more like 90:10 or even higher. Which means that we've got a major re-education campaign to perform.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    13. Re:drill for oil and frack your land by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I have heard that there are fields in Europe which can be exploited with the new methods.

      Absolutely there are. But more importantly, nobody, but nobody, absolutely nobody would go around fracking an existing field if they didn't need to. Spending several million dollars per well on a treatment that isn't necessary is called "wasting the investor's money" and is not efficient business.

      On the other hand, there are undeveloped fields and prospects which may not be economically exploitable without fracking. I'm working on proposals for one such myself (if you want details, invest ; I'll pass you the lawyer's contact information because I don't deal with that end of the company operations myself.) However, even in that case, one designs the well on the basis of optimising the likelihood of economic production without fracking, and you only frack if your well test indicates that you need to.

      The current approach though is new and was first put in use some point in the 90s with wide scale use in the US some point after 2000.

      The current system which is changing the economics of shale gas (and shale oil) production is a combination of horizontal drilling (which was developed, slowly, through the late 1980s and early 1990s, but by the mid-1990s it was becoming routine. An important component of that was the development of a variety of "rotary steerable systems" which allowed changes in configuration of the bottom hole assembly without having to round trip the drill string. With that, the constraint on controlling the direction of a well was mainly lifted, and steering a well to (and beyond) the horizontal became economically feasible. By 1996 I was seeing wells inclined up as far as 125 degrees form the vertical.

      ... and I've got to go out. L8R

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    14. Re:drill for oil and frack your land by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pe...

        here is a breakdown by country. for example all of opec countries give us 3.700 TBPD canada alone gives us 3.100 TBPD (there is no US so im unaware of our own internal production that we keep vs exporting)

        All imports are 9.700 TBPD and 2/3rds of that is non opec (makes you wonder why open dictates the price of oil here as much as it does)

        TBPD = thousand barrels per day

      Yep, thanks but none of which answers the question of how much of what is consumed in the US is produced in the US. If the US were a mass exporter of petroleum products you would think that you wouldn't need to import at all and would, indeed, be independent of OPEC - which is obviously not at all the case.

      Since we don't have the actual data, it seems more likely that the US does not, in fact, produce most of what it consumes based on US reliance of external oil sources.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    15. Re:drill for oil and frack your land by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/...

      Net imports accounted for 40% of the petroleum consumed in the United States, the lowest annual average since 1991.

      The top five source countries of U.S. petroleum imports in 2012 were Canada, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, Venezuela, and Russia.

      Okay I stand corrected, thanks for the info -

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
  5. Solar Panels by Had_It146 · · Score: 1

    If your roof is big enough load it up with solar panels also put a water tank up there. During the day when you are at work use the power heat and to fill the tank. At night use gravity to spin an impeller to power the house from the water.

    1. Re:Solar Panels by jklovanc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I will use Germany figures as that is what I have access to. The yearly average use of electricity is 3,471Kwhrs/yr. Daily use is average 9.6KkWh. The potential energy is water follows the following formula 1000 kilograms of water (1 cubic meter) at the top of a 100 meter tower has a potential energy of about 0.272 kWh. Since the house is a lot shorter than 100m lets use 10m which means for ever cubic meter of water on the roof you get 0.0272kWh. To store half a day's energy you would need 9.6/2/.0273 = 176 cubic meters of water which weighs 176 metric tonnes. You better have a very strong roof.

    2. Re:Solar Panels by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      At night use gravity to spin an impeller to power the house from the water.

      That would be one huge water tank. Better invest in some major structural enhancements.

    3. Re:Solar Panels by vivian · · Score: 1

      The gravitational potential energy in a ton of water - a cubic meter (ie. 1000 litres) elevated 3 meters, the typical 1 storey roof height, is about 8.1 watt hours. you would need a 1200000 litre tank to store the typical household load of 20 kWh., even assuming 100% efficiency in energy conversion to electricity.

    4. Re:Solar Panels by DoomSprinkles · · Score: 1

      Is there already kits for this available? Id like to read their claimed output the gravity turbine

    5. Re:Solar Panels by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      This is just a potential energy calculation and does not take into account any loss due to the turbine.

    6. Re:Solar Panels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You haven't thought that through. I know because I have made that gedankenexperiment. The potential energy of a ton of water at an altitude difference of 12m (three-story building) is just 1000kg * 9.8m/s^2 * 12m = 117600Nm = 117600Ws = 33Wh = 0.033kWh. You would need a tank for 30 tons of water (and 30 tons of water) to store just 1kWh in the form of potential energy.

    7. Re:Solar Panels by war4peace · · Score: 1

      My childhood house had this:
      - Rain falling on the house roof was channeled into a subterranean pool.
      - Water stored there was used to water the garden and wash out the shit from the outside loo.

      I wonder whether building a second subterranean room below the first would do the trick. The rooms should be quite large (7x7x5 meters each!) to store up to 195 cubic meters of water, but if you have a large enough courtyard you should be able to make two 10x10x2 meter rooms on top of each other, separated by a strong ceiling. You could bring the water back to the top room by using energy coming from a small wind-operated turbine.

      This is just theory, throw rocks at will.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    8. Re:Solar Panels by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      You completely miss the issue that to store energy there must be a significant difference between the heights of the two tanks. The equation is volume times drop = potential energy. As the drop decreases the volume has to proportionally increase. If you have two identical tanks on the top of each other the difference in height is at most the height of one of the tanks. In you example a 2 meter difference in height would require a tank 5 times as large as the one I calculated. Also, even a 7m x 7m x 10m is a very big hole. Those tanks would also need to be sized up to 10m x 10m x 5m for a total of 10m x 10m x 10m, an even bigger hole.

      My calculations are even on the optimistic side as they are averages and do not deal with peak usage as in the cold winter where your heat pump will use more electricity.

    9. Re:Solar Panels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One major error in your calculation is that you are assuming solar will not be available for half the day's power usage. In fact the great majority of power usage is during the day when solar is available. People use very little power at night. Sure your lights are on in the evening but lights take very little power compared to an air conditioner or even a refrigerator, computer, TV, etc. (and your fridge needs less juice at night because it's colder). Then you go to bed and it's almost all shut off. Usage is still maybe too much to make water tank potential energy storage economical for most people but way less than you are estimating.

      Plus on top of that if you are intentionally trying to shift as much usage as possible to the daytime you can stretch it quite a bit further. Then if you are in Russian-cutoff emergency mode you can get by with no power at all at night, or just a tiny bit for a few lights. The fridge will stay coldish overnight. Really, when you are talking about emergencies and contingencies like this the standard cost-benefit calculation of solar versus coal or whatever goes out the window. People who need reliable off-grid power have to and are often willing to pay a much higher price than you pay for grid power. In that circumstance solar is more economical than a generator, and if you are in a remote area (inconvenient to bring in more fuel) it's much more economical. The US military's starting to use solar a lot for that reason; also off-grid infrastructure like roadside call-boxes use solar. Minimizing power usage also becomes very important.

    10. Re:Solar Panels by vipw · · Score: 1

      People use most of their energy during non-sunlit times during the winter in Central Europe. It's primarily heating from gas, not electricity usage. This is why they care about Russia who is the only possible gas supplier.

      The answer the the question is actually incredibly simple. Switch to electricity. It's more efficient to heat homes burning natural gas at a electricity generating plant and using heat pumps than to burn the gas directly on premise. Gas is not the only suitable fuel for electrical generation, so the monopoly can be broken by switching the power plants to coal/wind/nuclear. This is a fairly capital expensive proposition, but on-site solar heat production in the European winter is pure wishful thinking.

  6. Generator and fuel by captain_nifty · · Score: 2

    If it's 24 hour semi-reliable power you want for periodic short (up to several days) grid outages than the easiest method would probably be a small generator and a stored supply of fuel. (not the most environmental but it works)

    Some will suggest solar with your roof area, which you are obviously aware of, but if you want 24 hour power with that you will need a large battery bank which is going to cost you more and take up a large amount of space.

    As far as heating the cost effective method is to add more insulation, and if you're running servers you have a ready made electric heat source.

    1. Re:Generator and fuel by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You don't need a large batter set up. You need a way to store the energy. And chemical battery is only one way to do that.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Generator and fuel by captain_nifty · · Score: 2

      Chemical batteries are also, generally the cheapest most compact method to store electricity, which is what you need to run servers, if all you want to do is store energy, hot water is a better method.

      All the other storage methods have huge losses when trying to get electricity out, requiring larger and larger storage capacity to deliver the required electricity.
      .

    3. Re:Generator and fuel by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Good advice. And add some gas powered cooking appliances & keep a few tanks on hand. Don't try to be 'environmental' during power outages or worst case conditions, instead invest to save energy the rest of the time and you're per euro impact will be much greater.

    4. Re:Generator and fuel by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      ..... its your, not you're. Mod me embarrassed.

    5. Re:Generator and fuel by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      periodic short (up to several days) grid outages

      The last time that we were getting significant power outages (as opposed to occasional glitches from lightning, people driving into power lines, ice bringing lines down ... and the system taking a couple of cycles to switch in alternative circuits from the regional/ national/ transnational grid) was during miners strikes in the 1970s. Then, the power was going out for hours at a stretch. But even then, the power available was switched between industrial users at some times, and domestic users at other times. Sometimes domestic users would get power on for a couple of hours, off for a couple of hours.

      If things get as far as 24-hour outages, then you probably can't rely on the power coming back on in the foreseeable future. For a start, much of people's domestic stocks of food will deteriorate, and you're very rapidly eating into the 3 meal gap between civilisation and barbarism.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  7. Dice and psyops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well done Dice! engaging in psyops... this article was CLEARLY written by an european!

  8. Invest in energy efficiency... and a generator by unimacs · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You said you own the roof space. Do you own the whole dwelling? Can you insulate the walls, attic, and air seal bypasses? Can you run a heat pump? It still requires electricity but not that much. If you can purchase petrol when it's available and run a generator (or photovoltaics) when it's not, that might be the ticket. Of course the more more energy efficient your home and appliances are, the easier it will be to function off the grid, - even if it's just sporadically.

    Do you really need to run your own server or can you have it hosted somewhere else?

    1. Re: Invest in energy efficiency... and a generator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone with a 6kw PV array, solar is nice, but if I had to rely on it for heating it could be bad. If I were in your position, I would get a flex fuel generator with liquid cooling and then modify the cooling loop to do some house heating (you can also set up a liquid cooling loop on the exhaust, just make sure the exhaust never comes inside.) another interesting option with a flex fuel generator is a gassifier that can turn almost any plant matter into fuel.

    2. Re:Invest in energy efficiency... and a generator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You said you own the roof space. Do you own the whole dwelling?

      No.

      Can you insulate the walls, attic, and air seal bypasses?

      The walls and attic seem well insulated. There are air flows which I am supposed to leave open but could probably put a controlled seal on.

      Can you run a heat pump? It still requires electricity but not that much. If you can purchase petrol when it's available and run a generator (or photovoltaics) when it's not, that might be the ticket

      I'll try investigating. Likely the moment I care about heating is when it's quite cold (e.g. -20) so maybe heat pumps wouldn't work so well then?

      Of course the more more energy efficient your home and appliances are, the easier it will be to function off the grid, - even if it's just sporadically.

      Totally.

      Do you really need to run your own server or can you have it hosted somewhere else?

      You ask on Slashdot? Of course I need it.. I already have some hosted servers ;-)

  9. Thinking Laterally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The most obvious answer - the context of your question points to it - would be to suggest some form of photovoltaic panel solution. Unfortunately there are at least two or three problems with this:-
    1. Your "generating space" is by your description limited to the space on the roof. You'd need to do some calculations to assure yourself that the space available is sufficient to generate a meaningful quantity of electricity. This problem will shrink with time, as more efficient panels are released.
    2. As we see from a cursory glance at the news, research into photovoltaic technology is yielding amazing benefits every few months. This means that, anything you invest in now would most likely be wildly out of date in just a couple of years. Does that bother you?
    3. Most calculations I've seen suggest that the ROI break-even for PV panels can be anything up to 20-25 years. Is your planning able to look this far ahead?

    Perhaps another way to look at this might be to look at a bigger picture. In 25 years from now, it won't just be electricity that's a challenge, but is also likely to include both food and fresh water. This might seem a bit extreme at the close of 2014, but have you considered a relocation to a more rural location, and specifically somewhere that you could invest in i.e. ground pumps, perhaps have access to local fresh water and so on?

    You don't give any indication of budget or personal circumstance, so your options will be framed by these and other considerations.

    Final thought: depending upon your city of residence [well, country in this case] you may find your government willing to provide occasional grants or tax breaks to private citizens wishing to take the measures you outline. Notwithstanding my earlier comment regarding waiting for the tech to evolve to a price break-even point that works for you, it might also be worth exploring options on subsidies, grants, or tax breaks.

    Lastly: good for you!

  10. citation, please? by kraut · · Score: 5, Informative

    Most of leaders, at least in Germany and Hungary, are in bed with the Russians and likely won't do anything about fuel security.

    Don't know much about Hungary (*), but if you really think that Merkel is "in bed with the Russians" you have bigger problems than worrying about your fuel security.

    Anyway, oil dependence is essentially transport based; more specifically, private car use. So cut or reduce your dependence on that. You live in a multi-storey building of which you control only part - some kind of apartment block - so probably a fairly densely populated area. That makes it simple: If you currently drive a car to work, stop doing that. If you're really lazy, you could get a motorbike or scooter, drastically reducing your dependence; if you're not that lazy start cycling. With a bit of practice, a 20-30K commute on a bike is really not hard, and you'll save money on gym fees. That's oil dependance sorted.

    Natural gas is trickier if you don't own the building (or at least apartment). If you can, you should probably install solar panels on the roof - not for your own use, as such, but to take advantage of the feed-in tariffs. And then buy an electric convection heater so you can heat your apartment if the gas gets cut off. And maybe buy a good sleeping bag or extra duvet. That won't save you from a catastrophic meltdown - you'd need a wood burning stove, a cabin in the woods, and a seriously unhealthy dose of paranoia(**) for that, but it will make short outages of gas a lot more comfortable.

    (*) Feel free to sing this comment to the tune of Sam Cooke's "Wonderful World" :)
    (**) You seem to already have 1 of those three.

    --
    no taxation without representation!
    1. Re:citation, please? by Shakrai · · Score: 2

      With a bit of practice, a 20-30K commute on a bike is really not hard, and you'll save money on gym fees.

      Yeah, that's all well and good, except for two factors:

      1) Winter.
      2) We don't all have the luxury of coming to work smelling like someone who just took a 20-30K bike ride....

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:citation, please? by gerddie · · Score: 1

      ...Merkel probably doesn't want to do anything that might disrupt the German economy.

      Somehow it seems you didn't follow the news. And Merkel ...

    3. Re:citation, please? by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      I'm in England where late winter climate is stupendously cold - and we have the pesky Atlantic current stopping the island from freezing solid in October. Central Europe just gets fucking cold in winter, and when I say cold, I mean it gets colder than Greenland. Even in England at this time of year I will be wanting to get somewhere desperately (as in, life and death situation) to be caught out on a bike. If I even leave the house. I don't do cold, which is inconvenient considering where I live.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    4. Re:citation, please? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      I think #2 is a bigger concern than #1; at least for those of us who live in areas with real summers. My office is less than two miles away but I find it exceedingly difficult to contemplate walking there during the dog days of summer. It's possible during temperate days, though even at that I feel compelled to make the walk in active wear and change into work clothes upon my arrival. Walking two miles in dress clothes is no fun even when it's cool outside. Doing so when it's >30 degrees C with >80% relative humidity is impossible unless one wishes to torment themselves and their office mates for the next eight hours. At that point it's not even really feasible to change upon arrival, and since I don't have the luxury of working for a Google that provides on-site showers.....

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    5. Re:citation, please? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      No worries mate, other than your fingers and ears, you'll stay plenty warm while pedling 20-30Km unless your in Antarctica. It's a balmy -12 degrees Celsius in THULE, GREENLAND right now and 11 degrees Celsius in MINSK, BELARUS, so I suspect you might be exagerating a smidgen.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    6. Re:citation, please? by Nemyst · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think most Europeans think they have cold winters, but they don't really know what "winter" means. Hint: if your entire country gets paralyzed by less than 30cm of snow, you don't get bad winters. If you rarely dip below zero Celsius during daytime, you don't get bad winters.

      It always amuses me to see French exchange students arrive here. The ones with a modicum of sense will have talked with people here so they'd get good winter gear ASAP, but a few think that they're used to the cold. Then they get their first -25C in January.

    7. Re:citation, please? by westlake · · Score: 1

      If you're really lazy, you could get a motorbike or scooter, drastically reducing your dependence; if you're not that lazy start cycling. With a bit of practice, a 20-30K commute on a bike is really not hard, and you'll save money on gym fees.

      why do I get the feeling that the geek sees himself and everyone around him as forever twenty-five years old?

    8. Re:citation, please? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      This post would be so much better if you defined where "here" is. :)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    9. Re:citation, please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given French exchange students and -25C, I'm guessing Quebec.

    10. Re:citation, please? by codeButcher · · Score: 1

      Good on you for having a larger.... errrr.... more severe winter than Europe. But getting back on topic: do you cycle in those -25C for 20 or 30 km?

      --
      Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
    11. Re:citation, please? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

      1) thanx to global warming, germany has no real winters anymore since roughly 25 years (except where it is quite high, like Blackforest or the Alps)
      2) if you cicle without sweating, which is easy, you don't smell. Actually if you shower once a while and are healthy, you don't smell even if you sweat.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    12. Re:citation, please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in England where late winter climate is stupendously cold

      No mate, you're probably thinking of some other place, or have never been to England. England cold doesn't even begin to approach what could be called "stupendously cold" (had real laugh when I first read it, tbh). Oh btw, have you said your thanks to the Gulfstream?

    13. Re:citation, please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I mean who the fuck else would want to visit the land of those pâté-eating twats?

    14. Re:citation, please? by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      The only place I've been matching those conditions (though not the only place to have them, by any means) is Finland.

      I don't know how far they were going - the town I was in wasn't 20km on a side, I think - but I definitely saw people on bicycles. It was almost surreal. They're bundled up around the head so much you can barely see their eyes (mouths are just fog-emitting slits), they have thick winter gloves and boots on, and long-sleeved but light shirts and pants. Riding on thick mountain bike tires (excuse me, tyres) across snow that never goes away or even turns to ice in midwinter even if it doesn't snow for two weeks. This is a part of the world where they don't even bother icing the roads because it's so cold that icewater still freezes, and the only traction benefit you'd get from ice would be from its solid crystalline form (for which gravel works better). It did occasionally get above -25C at midday, not that the day as a whole was more than about five-six hours long (which doesn't leave a lot of time for biking). This was in January.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    15. Re:citation, please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > you really think that Merkel is "in bed with the Russians"

      Hungarian gov't is now led by the 100% pro-Putinist, pro-authoritarian FIDESZ party. The were the leading atlantist and "russkies go home" force in 1989 but turned cloak 180 degree between 2006 and 2010, while in parlamentary opposition.

      As for Germany's Merkel, Putin promised to return her historic prussian lands in present-day Republic of Poland, if Merkel allows him to curb away eastern areas of Poland for the new russian empire. The germans were never sincere in their recognition of the so-called Odera/Neisse post-WW2 borders. Furthermore, a joint teutonic-russian border would make it easy to export russian hydrocarbons to Germany via exclusive control pipelines and to the hell with other european countries... Of course, a joint russian-german border will, in due time, lead to yet another world war between these empires, but Merkel needs not worry about that, since she is quite old and childless. The Flood can come after her, as the hungarian proverb says...

      Poland is now arming herself like crazy with tanks and warplanes, but without having her own nukes, anglo-american oratory support not may not be enough to stop the teutonic-muscovite joint invasion and the resulting territorial partition, in a repetition of 1939. September 1. Honestly said, their best bet for defence is now under the mantle of Virgin Mary...

      Finland is another place Putin wants to restore under Kremlin's imperial rule, the so-called "finlandization" of a soviet satellite state, or even as the re-created history Grand Duchy of Finland. The problem is, scandinavian region european nations of Denmak, Norway, Sweden and Finland hate each other over old historic grievances and thus, cannot congregate for mutual defence. Sweden is the most hated among them, as Denmark has territorial demands against the southern tip of Swedish lands and Finland+Norway were formerly much oppressed swedish vassals. This is a big problem, because Sweden is a major military industrial power and could contribue tremendously to common defence (e.g. Gripen jet, Giraffe radar, ErieEye AWACS, Visby corvette, BAMS and CG/AT4 missiles, CV9030 IFV tank). The finnish are famous winter soldiers, 25k of them killed 200k russian conscripts in the 1939-40 war. Norwegians are excellent sharpshooters. The danes are dames, regrettably. But if Scandinavia held together as the Wiking Commonwealth, the red army would be soundly defeated, like in Afghanistan or worse!

    16. Re:citation, please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We'll see how this "no winter" thing goes when the Atlantic Thermohaline Current shuts off due to too much cold freshwater outflow from the Arctic (i.e. Gulf Stream)...

      Irony = global warming triggers already overdue next Ice Age... :P

    17. Re:citation, please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BS. I live in Finland. Some of my co-workers cycle to work every day around the year. -30C, a goddamn snowstorm, +30 C, Thunderstorm. Anything. During snowstorms bikes are sometimes way better, as you just can't get anywhere with a car, and abandoning your car on the driveway is not a nice thing to do. You can just carry your bike if there is too much snow. Or lock it somewhere and proceed as a pedestrian.

      Point 2 is valid. Although I'd believe there are showers available pretty much anywhere. My co-workers who cycle to work always smell shower fresh.

    18. Re:citation, please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only place I've been matching those conditions (though not the only place to have them, by any means) is Finland.

      I don't know how far they were going - the town I was in wasn't 20km on a side, I think - but I definitely saw people on bicycles. It was almost surreal. They're bundled up around the head so much you can barely see their eyes (mouths are just fog-emitting slits), they have thick winter gloves and boots on, and long-sleeved but light shirts and pants.

      I've had similar experiences in Kiev a couple of years back. Temperatures down to -23C, but there were still people riding bicycles. Everyone was well bundled up, but I did notice that the women coming into the office did ring a bag with there usual pumps, short skirts and tops to wear while inside. When I inquired about this custom, they claimed that western women just did not pay enough attention to their looks and generally looked frumpy.

    19. Re:citation, please? by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Cycling is most often easier than walking, in the cold. And it's door to door.
      With a car, you're walking to the car in the cold, then at arrival you step out of a heated car into the cold and walk the remaining length to the actual destination.
      I'm imagining a crowded city and no funds for your own private garage or great parking at the work place.. Even then, if you need to go to a campus, with car you'll go to the parking lot and walk some distance, with bicycle you'll park right next to the entrance of the building you need to get into.

    20. Re:citation, please? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      BS. I live in Finland. Some of my co-workers cycle to work every day around the year. -30C, a goddamn snowstorm, +30 C, Thunderstorm.

      Yeah, well, the rest of us don't have that much sisu. :)

      Point 2 is valid. Although I'd believe there are showers available pretty much anywhere.

      Umm, why would you believe that? I've been to Finland; there aren't showers "available pretty much anywhere" in Finland, much less in the United States. My employer doesn't provide showers for the benefit of employees who choose to cycle to work in +30 C temperatures. It would be nice if they did but they don't, so that's that. The only American employers I can think of that provide showers are those with on-site fitness centers, which isn't exactly unheard of, but it's definitely the exception and not the rule.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    21. Re:citation, please? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Try Uniqlo's anti-bacterial clothing. It keeps you dry and kills the bacteria that cause you to smell when you sweat.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    22. Re:citation, please? by holmstar · · Score: 1

      England gets stupendously cold? It routinely reached -28C last winter where I live. What would that be? "Ludicrously cold"? "Plaid"?

    23. Re:citation, please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      20-30km is a car trip, not a bicycle trip for vast majority of people. When I was going to school (in Finland), I rode a bicycle most days when it was -25C because it was faster than walking. That was 2-3km distance. People further away from the school would take a bus. Biking in that kind of cold isn't terribly difficult or dangerous, it's not as slippery as it gets in warmer temperatures. The worst is when you get a thaw followed by a re-freeze and dusting of snow on top of the fresh ice.

    24. Re:citation, please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, I wrote another comment on what the OP should do ( do nothing, germany has the resources to fucking buy oil from anyone they want and if it's too expensive they have the coal to do whatever the fuck they want, so the question asker is seriously delusional and if he's worried about the shit hitting the fan it's war he should be preparing for).

      but there's another way. a much simpler way. just get a telecommute programming job and relocate to south-east asia. I mean, it's worth it just for not having the goddamn winter at all.

      and really it's fucking laughable to read from UK peeps about harsh winters and how central europe gets seriously cold. you want seriously cold try Lapland or 90% of Russia. it's just that the suckers in UK never bothered to install insulation or heating and the reason to that is that they DON'T get harsh winters.

    25. Re:citation, please? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      2) We don't all have the luxury of coming to work smelling like someone who just took a 20-30K bike ride....

      Most work places that I've used in the last couple of decades have had at least some shower facilities. Not that it ever worried me, though my cycle into work varied between 3 and 8km (to the office) or 3-500km helicopter ride (to the worksite). Believe me, after 5 hours farting into a water and gas tight plastic bag, you don't exactly come out smelling of roses, and everyone was in one of those bags.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  11. community solar? by unimacs · · Score: 1

    One idea that's starting to take hold here is the notion of community solar. An individual homeowner may not have the ideal site for a solar installation, but maybe there is a place in the neighborhood that does. So a community solar project gets funding from many individuals that share the energy and the expense.

  12. Keystone Pipeline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keystone Pipeline. Have your leaders pressure our leaders to build it. We need the jobs and we need the energy independence.

    Signed,
    U.S. Citizen

    1. Re:Keystone Pipeline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Solyndra. Have your leaders pressure our leaders to fund it. We need the jobs and we need the energy independence.

      Signed,
      U.S. Citizen

  13. get a heat pump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    * Start by cutting the energy losses on your house. This can start as simple as avoiding unnecessary drafts, repainting your interior walls and ceilings with a radiant reflection additive like insuladd, thermic curtains near the windows, ...
    * Install radiant floor heating.
    * Install a simple wood fired boiler. Quite popular in some central European countries like Austria.
    * Get a low temperature air-water heat pump.
    * Put some solar panels on your roof if you haven't done so already.

    1. Re:get a heat pump by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      * Install a simple wood fired boiler. Quite popular in some central European countries like Austria.
      * Get a low temperature air-water heat pump.

      As I already mentioned, a wood fired boiler necessarily sucks in 50 cubic meters of cold air per 10 kg of firewood. When the outside temperature falls below minus 20 degrees centigrade your boiler will in fact cool you unless you install a dedicated pipe directly to the fireplace.

      The heat pump also will not work below about -20degC.

      And the last. If you use BOILER and not just a stove then prepare to spend a fortune to glycol.

  14. Move away from people by gatkinso · · Score: 3, Informative

    When they are sitting in the cold dark and see your lights, you have scant minutes before they kick down your door.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    1. Re:Move away from people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is central Europe. The door is 15-20cm thick of mostly steel, embedded with multipoint steel bolts into the surrounding wall and with a six point mortice lock to close it. Anyway, the neighbours will be bringing over bottles of good wine and food from their own ample stocks and generating body heat so they are welcome.

  15. Server by man_ls · · Score: 1

    What's the power consumption of the server? Depending on the load, you might be well-suited to pick up a small ARM-based system (or more than one) if the loads are somewhat light. Personal web server/file server/LDAP/etc. doesn't need a lot of horsepower and there's a good chance you might be burning extra electricity unnecessarily.

    1. Re:Server by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      One more traditional error. The 1-kW server will give 1kW of heat. The dedicated electric heater will give you the same 1kW of heat but no service expected from the server.

    2. Re:Server by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      If it doesn't get too cold, 1KW powering a heat pump will get you a lot more than 1KW of heat. If it does, electric heat is going to be way expensive, and you're probably better off burning methane or something like that. If it's so warm you don't need a heat pump or furnace, then you're going to pay to get rid of 1KW of heat. If you want to run a server, fine, but it's not going to cut your heating bills by much.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  16. Could always go old school... by dlingman · · Score: 2

    Minions and a giant hamster wheel hooked to a generator.

    If minions are in short supply, can always put a pig in the wheel. (Might need to swap pigs out every few hours) - but, you save, cause the wheel can be smaller.

  17. Buy gas now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gas prices have dropped. Buy gasoline now, get a UPS, and get a generator that is electric/remote start. Put gasoline stablizer in your tank if you're concerned about spoilage (which isn't much of a concern over one winter.)

    In order to be a good quiet neighbour, you can put the generator in a small soundproof box (box-within-box construction) with mufflers for air and exhaust.

    This doesn't solve your ultimate problem of dependence on Russia, but it'll get you through spotty power.

    Diesel works too.

    1. Re:Buy gas now by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      In a flat? Storing the fuel may be illegal, dangerous or void your home insurance ; running the generator may kill you with carbon monoxide.

    2. Re:Buy gas now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't the free market solution to go long on oil? Buy lots of oil stocks now, oil futures whatever, because you know they'll go up?

    3. Re:Buy gas now by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      Diesel is a viable strategy, but not gasoline. It degrades over time; you're not going to get 1 year storage life with gasoline. You'll also have to buy "pure" gasoline, not the stuff that's cut with 15% ethanol.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    4. Re:Buy gas now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The idea is not as stupid as you may think. I can get some off-site storage. At the point the power collapses I would be less worried by e.g. insurance and I can always put the generator on the balcony to avoid asphyxiation.

  18. Burn wood! Drink beer! by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Wood stove for heat!

    Drink beer and turn off the AC in summer.

    Seriously.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  19. efficiency first, then generation by PermacultureEngineer · · Score: 2

    Your most cost effective strategy is going to be to focus first on load reduction and efficiency, and then on reliable backup energy sources second. It's hard to give specific suggestions without knowing more about your situation. Space heating is likely to be critical in any case, and that can largely be handled by adequate insulation and air sealing. The Passivehouse Institute will have a lot of guidance for you there.

  20. if money is no object by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Solar on the roof to generate electricity. In winter, use the electricity to heat water and then run it through a heating loop in your building.

    In summer time, use the power for cooling.

    1. Re:if money is no object by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Solar produces next to nothing in winter.

    2. Re:if money is no object by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Depends on where you live and how many panels you have.
      We produce more electricity at our house every month then we use.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  21. Best Option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Move to a place that isn't like living in a sardine can and without the associated stupidity that cities generate.

    1. Re:Best Option by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      When you live in an apartment your apartment borders with outside with one of it's 6 sides. When you live in a separate building it borders with 5 sides of six meaning 5 times more heat losses and 5 times more money to heat it. Also, it means that you generate heat from fuel, and Europe is not Siberia with it's cheap firewood.

  22. Russia is just yet another european country by loonycyborg · · Score: 2

    I don't see a problem here. But oil overall oil will deplete soon enough and the best alternative is solar IMO. You can draw large amounts of power with solar panels alone, probably enough for a computer.

    1. Re:Russia is just yet another european country by WindBourne · · Score: 2

      Yes, but when they try to control others, as well as invade other European nations, well, that is a problem.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    2. Re:Russia is just yet another european country by loonycyborg · · Score: 1

      It's nothing different from other European countries. For example, Russia itself long time ago lost its old capital, Kiev, to invaders from Poland and Lithuania. Stuff like that will keep happening until concept of nationality and national state is fully obsolete.

    3. Re:Russia is just yet another european country by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      Gaddafi tried to control European nations with quite big loans and donations to their politicians. He doesn't count since he's African.
      European politicians decided to kill Gaddafi instead of returning loans. They don't count since he's African.
      Mishiko Saakashvili performed "Operation Clear Field" (Genocide of South Ossetia) but has been promptly stopped by Russians. It doesn't count since Georgia is Asia.
      USA spent lots of money to teach Ukrainians that they are not Ukrainians but sons of ancient Ukrs that have built the Ancient Egypt, excavated the Black Sea and made Caucasus Mountains out of the excavated soil, but ethnic Russians in Donbass are Colorado beetles, carriers of imperial ideology and as such require extermination. We Russians laughed at this idiocy not thinking that 23 years of such teachings would result in a bloodshed that cannot be stopped because it requires Russian (or other, say UN) tanks which are not allowed there, and OSCE patrols the border and allows no tanks. It does not count since USA is not Europe.
      Serbs has shot F-117 Stealth Fighter and, reportedly, B2 in 1999. It does not count since 117 is not European.
      USA finances Syrian opposition. ISIS is a result. It doesn't count since any side is European. 911 also resulted from the same US policy in Afghanistan. It also doesn't count - Afghanistan is Asia.
      And BTW USA controls Russian State bank with so called "Budget Rule" that requires excess money to be spent to US Treasures while Russian companies borrow money from West. It also doesn't count.
      Albanians were allowed to run to Serbia from maoist Albanian regime and settle in Kosovo. And they cut Kosovo from Serbia with NATO help. Oops, they are all Europeans... Well, this is a problem.

  23. drill for oil and frack your land by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US has so much production now the oil companies have been refining it and exporting gasoline because of laws enacted because of the 70's OPEC gouging preventing exporting crude oil. They have been working with the Republicans to get those laws eliminated and so the US will probably start exporting lots more fuel and crude with this new Congress. Time to rejoice in new oil company profits.

  24. I don't know that much about your environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can tell you what I'm doing in *my* environment. It may or may not give you good ideas.

    First, what's the biggest energy draw in your life? When I lived in a city, I rested comfortably knowing that while I couldn't insulate myself from the secondary effects of high fuel prices, I could eliminate the primary effect. It was possible for me to survive without a car. Actually, even though I now live in a far-flung exurb, this is still possible but it would be a pretty boring life. Technically, I don't need a motor vehicle to *survive* but it would be mere existence.

    You're asking for more than just heat--you're asking for servers too so I'm going to assume you're at a "Western" level of desire and are simply trying to maintain a lifestyle as oppose to simply survive.

    OK, so what's special about my environment here in NorCal? Well, it's semi-rural. I'm on the grid; but not subject to Bay Area restrictions. That means I can use wood to supplement my heat. So far I haven't had to do that because the weather has been warm.

    I combine old and new technology here--I scrounge for free wood using technology. I'm not going to go into details on this; but it's all perfectly legal. I'm not poaching any wood, and I'm not even using the National Forest's fuels program which gets you wood for a very modest fee (but you must conform to rules, supply your own truck, winch, chainsaw, etc.; it's not for the faint of heart or a loner and may not be economical if you value your time and don't already have the right equipment)

    Before any hardcore environmentalists get on my case, do realize that if I didn't burn wood in my stove it would just build up on people's properties, in forests, neighborhoods, etc and make the air that much worse in the Summer. This is a very sustainable source of heat if used responsibly, and that's what I do; so suck it!

    Now being in central Europe I have no idea what alternatives you have available, but these are mind. I got my water heater converted to electric (needed a new one anyway) so I don't need any gas. I'm very cognizant of opening/closing blinds and window coverings at appropriate times. I only heat the rooms I need to heat. The only room I heat at night is the bedroom. This reminds me, I need to check the insulation on my pipes because we freeze here. If you heat selectively like this, you run a greater risk of freezing pipes.

    So. Maybe I've given you some ideas. In general, I like electricity because the plant can make decisions about the primary fuel. I like wood because it's a low-tech alternative that works if the power goes out (and they tell me that power outages are a problem up here when it rains).

    Anyway to reiterate, the solutions are going to be unique to your environment somewhat.

  25. Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get about a bazillion used smoke detectors and...

    1. Re:Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Instead of DIY, just go out and buy a commercial solution. Or go to Russia and go find an abandoned light house or submarine and take the nuclear battery.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  26. Hogwash is that a word? by pigsycyberbully · · Score: 1

    The French have nuclear power and own most of U.K. electric. The British have North Sea oil and natural gas. Norway is the eighth largest crude oil exporter in the world (at 78Mt), and the 9th largest exporter of refined oil (at 86Mt). Its the world's third largest natural gas exporter at 99bcm. And so on plenty of oil and gas in Europe. Cheap Chinese solar power panels I've seen on the rooftops of country properties all over the European Union, especially Amsterdam, and England.

  27. Algeria gas is waiting for Rusia to screw up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    most of Europe's (and quite a bit of China's) gas supply comes from Russia and is very likely to be cut off several times during the next few winters

    Algeria sells gas to Europe and is one of the biggest producers. Already there are gas pipelines connecting Algeria with Spain and Italy.

    If Russia cuts the supply "too much" risks to speedup the works to connect the rest of Europe to the Algerian gas.

    1. Re:Algeria gas is waiting for Rusia to screw up by Pino+Grigio · · Score: 1

      And the US is building gas terminals to export their glut overseas. Europe hasn't even started with shale yet either, for political reasons. There's absolutely no excuse, If it does happen it will be entirely down to retarded policies of the European Union, which committed to "decarbonisation" at massive cost, whilst at the same time cosying up to the Mafia regime in Moscow for its energy supplies.

  28. Mini-split and Solar PV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    #1, insulate and air seal.

    #2, Mini-split heat pump (yes, you're dependent on the electricity being on), but if your electric utility has a brain they're adding wind and solar capacity as fast as they can (and starting to add battery storage as well which is already becoming cheaper than peaker plant power). Central Europe's climate is fine for modern mini-split heat pumps.

    #3, Solar panels. Thanks to massive price drops of panels in the past 10 years, the price of residential grid-tied solar systems, even before subsidy, is cheaper than grid power in many, many locations around the world (and even in 10 US States, all 50 projected by the end of 2016). And you'll be helping your neighbors get off Russian gas too.

    #4, If you purchase an electric vehicle, you can hack it to act as a power supply in the event there is a power interruption - you'll have at minimum 20kWh of usable storage there, possibly more depending on how close the nearest functional charger is.

    And send the server to a proper data center.

    It turns out that Ukraine is on a utility-scale solar buying binge at the moment. Can't for the life of me imagine why. ;)

  29. Thinking Laterally - solar in winter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Had solar photovoltaic installed about a year back. Unfortunately on those overcast rainy dark days in December, January & February I've seen whole days where my nearly 4kW system has put out a whopping 50W. Some days I can boil a kettle and still export a little, but unfortunately I don't think it will help much as a source of heat on the most overcast short winter days. I don't deny that it is a useful investment, but don't expect miracles.

    1. Re:Thinking Laterally - solar in winter by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 1

      Had solar photovoltaic installed about a year back. Unfortunately on those overcast rainy dark days in December, January & February I've seen whole days where my nearly 4kW system has put out a whopping 50W.

      Hm... could this be the result of clouds blocking the sun? See if the owner's manual has an appendix, that is often where you find a list of troubleshooting procedures --- since the appendices are often written by the engineers themselves, you often find useful tidbits of info there that didn't fit into the how-to narrative and are not part of the sales pitch.

      I sympathize with your problem but I am also relieved that it is obviously a local phenomenon, since there are so many here on Slashdot who haven't experienced this, as they continue to advocate the use of solar energy for base load power generation for an industrial society.

      Good luck to you friend and I hope you find the problem and get those panels back up to 4kW all day, every day since that is what you paid for... you might try mounting a large Fresnel lens over your kettle to help it come to a boil on those cloudy days.

      --
      <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
  30. Budget? by Moof123 · · Score: 1

    Critical to any of your questions is your budget, as well as available space secondarily.

    If you have the $$$ you can of course install solar as well as install a very pricey battery bank and inverter setup to have power backup. It is possible to get yourself setup for a few days of stored energy without too much trouble (still very expensive). Get an EV like a Leaf or a Tesla to avoid petrol usage. Stay grid tied so that you can keep keep your battery bank and EV topped up during long dark periods in case the power cuts out. Being 100% power independent by yourself is not a trivial matter, but having a house scale UPS is not impossible with enough cash to throw at the problem.

    Install a wood burning stove and keep at least a few weeks of wood or wood pellets stashed for heating backup.

    But really, we cannot have an advancing society if the most basic infrastructure of heating, power, and water is not solidly maintained and reliable. Having everyone running with a hodge-podge of backups is really inefficient for everyone in society. Consider moving to a different country if you can, trying to fix your own country these days will get you black listed or disappeared.

  31. I guess I'll be the first to say it... by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 3, Informative

    There is no good solution.

    Solar panels and a battery bank will keep you in minimal electricity. You can run a tablet, a laptop and internet router plus perhaps charge your flashlights. A larger installation might run a 12-volt microwave or 12-volt freezer.

    As for heat, I suggest many layers of clothing and lots of well insulated quilts. Hot water bottles were once popular and will be again.

    Cooking? If you can get to the roof, then buy a few bags of coal for the winter and a heater than can handle coal (not a standard wood stove) and cook up there. Coal is fairly cheap, compact and generates a good amount of heat. With coal, you can boil water for the aforementioned hot water bottles.

    Coal will also kill you with carbon monoxide if you try burning it inside the house. Try and avoid that.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    1. Re:I guess I'll be the first to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Coal will also kill you with carbon monoxide if you try burning it inside the house. Try and avoid that.

      On the other hand, it'll solve any and all problems you have, permanently.

    2. Re:I guess I'll be the first to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You've got a good start here, let me add my solutions to it :)
      Note that this is for going full-blown paranoia while still maintaining current living quarters. I live in Europe and am certainly not considering this (I just like a puzzle)

      For heating get one of these babies: http://www.haassohn.com/en
      Heat your main room with it. You can heat water bottles or stones and place them in bed, but I suggest insulation and just getting good covers.
      Build a woodstockpile on your roof.

      For cooking, buy a cooking set + gas: http://www.ebharatgas.com/pages/FAQ/FAQ_Rules.html#
      11kg will get you about 3 weeks.
      There's also haassohn cooking stuff, but imho you're better off cooking on gas (reliable constant heat, easier to adjust high-low)

      Lighting: rewire your house to use LED directly, without the builtin transformers. Hook this system to a car battery (or better yet a special battery), charged by solar panels.
      Forget about your server (wtf will you need that for, big chance internet is out already) or buy a good UPS if the outages last short times. Do buy a tablet (for movie-addiction, can charge off of car battery) and stock up on books and games (buy them second hand). If the family (?) demands to watch movies together, hook up the tablet to a pico-projector.

      On the top of your roof, next to all the wood, you'll be growing your own garden and stockpile on food. Because long-term power outages also screw up with supermarkets.

    3. Re:I guess I'll be the first to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Laptop, tablet contribution is negligible compared to heating power. It does not matter much whether you run them on solar or on mains.
      Electricity can be generated in a number of ways, most of which barely depend on oil and gas. So it actually makes sense to go all-electric.

      What *does* matter is reducing the power required. Insulating the house, first and foremost, because that's where most of the energy goes.

      Using coal on small scale is not effective, not eco-friendly, and takes a lot of time both to set up and to operate. Cooking on coal in particular is an exercise in vanity.
      If anything, coal should be used to generate electricity, large-scale. Said electricity can then be used for high-efficiency cooking appliances.

    4. Re:I guess I'll be the first to say it... by gewoonm · · Score: 1

      (posted anon before, for no good reason) You've got a good start here, let me add my solutions to it :) Note that this is for going full-blown paranoia while still maintaining current living quarters. I live in Europe and am certainly not considering this (I just like a puzzle) For heating get one of these babies: http://www.haassohn.com/en Heat your main room with it. You can heat water bottles or stones and place them in bed, but I suggest insulation and just getting good covers. Build a woodstockpile on your roof. For cooking, buy a cooking set + gas: http://www.ebharatgas.com/page... 11kg will get you about 3 weeks. There's also haassohn cooking stuff, but imho you're better off cooking on gas (reliable constant heat, easier to adjust high-low) Lighting: rewire your house to use LED directly, without the builtin transformers. Hook this system to a car battery (or better yet a special battery), charged by solar panels. Forget about your server (wtf will you need that for, big chance internet is out already) or buy a good UPS if the outages last short times. Do buy a tablet (for movie-addiction, can charge off of car battery) and stock up on books and games (buy them second hand). If the family (?) demands to watch movies together, hook up the tablet to a pico-projector. On the top of your roof, next to all the wood, you'll be growing your own garden and stockpile on food. Because long-term power outages also screw up with supermarkets.

    5. Re:I guess I'll be the first to say it... by gewoonm · · Score: 1

      ugh :( Looked fine in preview, screwed up in final. Better version: http://hardware.slashdot.org/c...

  32. Pellets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just bought a pellet stove (I live in Boston) and I love it.

    The only problem is that if you live in an apartment, you need to be able to install a stove and you need space for 3 tons (150 bags of pellets assuming one bag a day) of pellets.

    I just got the pellet stove installed two weeks ago and my house is at 70 - 72 F (21 - 22 C).

    I use one bag of pellets (5.20 - 5.50 USD) per day.

    Strongly recommended if you have the cash to purchase one.

  33. reducing footprint by confused+one · · Score: 1

    cheap Chinese solar panels on the roof, with an inverter capable of islanding if you can get it past your building codes people. That way you'll have some power during the day when there's no power in the city. Do you own the land? If so, put in a geothermal heat pump. More efficient than traditional heat pumps; so, lower energy consumption and lower operating cost. You're in the city so wood heating might be out of the question... If it's not, put in a wood pellet stove for heat when the oil and gas supplies are cut. If the city infrastructure is down for any significant time, you're going to be out of luck (lack of basic supplies, facilities, water, sewer, etc....)

  34. Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use fusion power.

  35. Different type of turbine by xaotikdesigns · · Score: 1
    I remember seeing a different type of turbine. It was rather small, and had more curved blades. I think it was these ones here

    They were supposed to be able to supply power to a small house or apartment.

    --
    XDInd
  36. Non-expert suggestions by steveha · · Score: 1

    I'm not an expert, but you asked on Slashdot so I guess you are willing to listen to non-expert opinion.

    • Insulate as much as you can. In the USA we can hire experts to come out, look at a building, make recommendations, and then carry out the work. My home, for example, had its insulation upgraded as much as possible: thick insulation in the attic space, as much insulation into the walls as they could take (not much), and windows replaced with triple-pane windows filled with krypton gas.
    • If you expect to lose power for only short times, it may be enough to have a large capacity UPS on your server. For long-term independence you will need a generator.
    • Could your server needs be handled by a low-power server? I use an HP Proliant Microserver which is pretty much a laptop motherboard (uses an AMD Turion II mobile processor). Perhaps you could use an actual laptop for your server and have a built-in "UPS" in the battery.
    • For rooftoop solar, photovoltaic panels would be simplest, but I believe that panels that collect heat are the most efficient. I suggest you Google search for "solar off-grid" and "solar water heating" and read about these.
    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  37. Move by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    Move somewhere where the power is mostly local and non-fossil in origin, and preferably where you have an ocean or two between where you live and any countries that might want a rematch for world domination (if tanks are rolling outside of your window, where your power comes from becomes a secondary concern). Pacific Northwest (either Canadian or American) fits the bill.

    1. Re:Move by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      You are right. If you live in a country that has won the match for world domination and has an ocean or two between it and it's own tanks blasting the world to submission - it's quite safe.
      It's also quite safe to press the green papers, pay with them for Russian oil, then press Russia to invest them to derivatives and at last to initiate a financial crisis to burn said derivatives and leave Russian pensioners without pensions.

    2. Re:Move by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is. That's precisely what the matches for world domination are fought for. And at any given point, it's always better to be on the winning side. Especially when it looks like it's time for another rematch, and the winners of last round are much better prepared for this one as well.

    3. Re:Move by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      It will last while no oil is sold for any other currency except green papers.

      Saddam tried to trade oil for Euros. Killed.

      Gaddafi tried to establish a gold dinar. Killed.

      And then your President made an epic fail: he pressed SWIFT to disconnect Iran. It appeared to be impossible to bomb Iran to submission, and Iran, seeing no method to obtain dollars, began taking everything in exchange. There are rumors that Iran took from Turkey a physical gold. Basically it means that gold becomes a currency again.

      Then your President made a second Epic Fail. He stated that every dollar transaction in the world should be performed according to US laws, even if all sides are not US residents. As a result, the leading french bank plainly refused to work with dollars. Then it was an avalanche of events, beginning with Iran selling oil to Russia for consumer goods to opening an oil exchange in SPb, Russia, trading oil for everything including yuans.

      Didn't your mother teach you that the loans should be repaid?

    4. Re:Move by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      And yet vast majority of oil is still traded for dollars by pretty much everyone - including Russia. And most countries hold reserves in dollars. And most international debts are in dollars. And hey, look whose economy is in the shitter right now?

      As for loans, it's pretty easy to repay them if they are defined in terms of currency that you control. That's why smart people don't just ask for all of it back at once - because they might actually get what they ask for, and they won't like it then.

      And epic fails are honestly not so epic when you're the king of the hill. It might take you down a notch or two, but it doesn't matter when you're a hundred of those notches above the rest.

    5. Re:Move by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      This is a fundamental difference between us. The quintessence. It's why all the world fears our Russian Bear and hates your American Eagle.

      You have a world domination and so can print green paper, create it's value out of thin air and pay with it for everything you like. And everybody who sells the oil for everything except this green paper shall be democratized to the stone age. You don't ask yourself whether it's just. It's just efficient.

      We believe that it's unjust to do. We believe that if we have some money then the country that issued this money has some goods and is willing to sell us, and if not so then the disparity MUST be corrected for the GREATER JUSTICE and not because we profit from it. And we will correct it sacrificing our lives in the process.

      After this, it's not necessary to discuss the fact that your economy does not produce anything except the paper. We at least pump the oil. All your production facilities are in China, and your Detroit lies in ruins. And that your dollars cannot buy anything valuable. Car - yes, car factory - no.

    6. Re:Move by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The world doesn't fear your Russian bear - for the most part, it doesn't really care. It's only feared at times as a rabid animal, not as a dangerous an equal opponent.

      As far as justice goes, Eastern Europe has quite a tale to tell about Russian justice there. Let's go ask Ukrainians, or Hungarians, or Poles, or Czech... don't delude yourself - you're not better than any other empire in history.

      As far as economies go, you're deluded as well. Go look at the industrial output numbers - China only surpassed US a year ago, and the latter remains a close second. And if you look at high-tech industries - including, ironically, things such as factory equipment that you've brought up - US is still the industrial powerhouse of the world. In terms of oil production, USA pumps 10% of the world's global output (Russia pumps 13%) - but US, unlike Russia (and most Middle Eastern countries), utilizes much more high-tech methods of extracting that oil, and as time passes by, will simply run out of cheap oil to pump. And in terms of natural gas production, US is actually ahead of Russia. So yeah, we pump our own, too, but it's really such a silly thing to be proud of.

      So keep pumping your oil, trading it for our green paper, and telling yourself about how your economy is so much more substantial than the American one. So long as you keep yourself deluded that way, you will keep waiting dreamily for that "final collapse of US economy", predicted by your politicians with boring regularity year after year, always at most five years away, which never happens, instead of trying to actually fix something... and in the meantime, the ruins of your empire keep crumbing slowly, all while the green paper keeps going around and bringing good stuff back into US.

      Good stuff, by the way, includes people as much as goods. The ones that are more capable sooner or later understand the nature of the national delusion they're living in, and after some time and frustration trying to explain it to the others, give up and leave for greener (heh!) pastures. People like you are the ones who are left. Again, the system works to the advantage of this country, and to disadvantage of yours, over time - but for political reasons and for the sake of saving face you refuse to acknowledge it as a problem, and hence deal with it. It's easier than buying land from Indians for beads and fire water, yet just as profitable.

      And what's funniest of all, when you get mad at US, you do what? Fuck up a random neighbor, like Ukraine, after arbitrarily designating them as the local "agent of American imperialism" or some such for the day. US, of course, doesn't care in the slightest, and you get another war on your borders for your troubles, and a bitter neighbor that will trip you up out of spite at any opportunity for decades to come. Free self-containment!

    7. Re:Move by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      Similarly, go ask Poles about Ukrainian justice and Germans about Chech justice. You will find many interesting facts about our "Random neighbors". And also ask about them the Uzhgorod Hungarians (I mean their ukrainization by current Ukrainian state). You know, the ukrainization of ethnic Russians of East Ukraine and Crimea and their national revolt is not the theme for civilized Europeans...

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E...

      all while the green paper keeps going around and bringing good stuff back into US.

      Yes, your Ponzi scheme works. But it does NOT make it just.

    8. Re:Move by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      Excuse me. I just have not noticed your "Glory to Heroes". Please keep jumping.

    9. Re:Move by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Yes, of course. Like I said, you're not better than any other empire. You're not any worse, either. Your problem is your illusions of grandeur, that's all.

  38. Wood? by FishTankX · · Score: 1

    Is Kerosene cheap? Stockpiling enough kerosene to make it through a gas fluctuation should be trivial. In Japan my main spaceheating kerosene tank held 80 liters and I kept 100 liters in reserve on my deck.

    a closet could easily store 200 liters in poly tanks. 1 liter could heat the house for two hours. So a typical heating day I would use 4 liters. Use an electric blanket at night. So my stockpile could last me about a month. Maybe less for you. How long is a gas cutoff?

    For electricity you could stockpile diesel and enough to run a generator for weeks. you could use cogen by running hot water from the cooling system into a radiator in your house.

    I'm unfamiliar with your housing situation but a lister clone diesel with generator is probably $1000 and could run your house and they last forever. can also be serviced by hand. probably same rate of fuel consumption 4 liters per day with enough heat to cut space heating requirements in half.

  39. Best-kept secret in home heating... by lyran74 · · Score: 1

    ... is far infrared (FIR) panels. Not the hot-element, near-infrared kind, these ones come in various sizes and colours and emit no visible light. They're also very safe – they get warm, but it would take several seconds' contact to scald yourself. Surface temperature wouldn't boil water.

    Counterintuitively, they are best mounted on ceilings in commonly-occupied places, radiating heat downward. They heat the objects and people in the room, and the air mostly indirectly. The infrared light/heat bouncing around the room means you can be comfortable at an ambient air temperature about 5C lower than with traditional heating. They're common in infrared saunas and hot yoga studios, but new to the home heating market. I haven't had a full winter with mine yet, but claims of savings on the order of 40% are common.

    These are more efficient and far less costly to install than radiant floor heating systems... several hundred euros per panel, plus installation.

    Before you consider any heating system, however, know the differences among radiant, convective and conductive heat transfer!

    For bonus points, combine with renewably-sourced electricity and other home energy loss minimizations.

    1. Re:Best-kept secret in home heating... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that the EU gets a lot of electricity from NatGas fired Turbines. Not only will disruptions of Natgas effect home heating, but also electricity.

      Basically if you reliant on public resources for energy and those resources are vulnerable to supply disruptions than the only realist solution is relocation to a place that has more reliable energy resources, or to a place you can provide your own energy resources (ie Biomass, Coal, Wind, Solar, hydro, etc).

  40. Renewable energy!.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just kidding. Frack, baby, frack.

  41. Insulation + modern ventillation systems by impossiblefork · · Score: 1

    I've given some thought to this and believe that insulation, modern well-designed heat and ventilation systems, perhaps incorporating heat exchangers for heat-recovery from the air leaving the house, systems to heat the water with sunlight hitting the roof or heat storage using a borehole heat exchanger are the right solution.

  42. One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Move.

  43. Nuclear power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you've got nukes, keep them. Otherwise, build next-gen plants like LFTR (Thorium). If you're in a country run by the Greens, vote the out of office.

    1. Re:Nuclear power by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      It means that you either buy uranium from us Russians and return spent isotopes to Russia where they are buried somewhere in tundra, or have your personal fluorescent nuclear tundra in the middle of inhabited Europe. Do you really need a fluorescent tundra?

  44. Re:Communism is the only solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about libertarian socialism. Libertarian on individual freedoms, socialist in that the government creates money to pay for social services.

    As a hedge against inflation, index everything, income, bank accounts, transfer payments, everything to inflation, so purchasing power does not decrease.

    Make taxes voluntary.

    The BIS reports that OTC derivatives worldwide are $710 trillion. That's how much money the private sector creates, an order of magnitude more than governments.

  45. Petrol heater by Ketorin · · Score: 2

    Buy a petrol heater, you know the kind that doesn't have a chimney.

    With this device you can emergency heat your apartment with wide variety of liquid fuels, thus drastically reducing the number of solar panels required.

    Real 70s countryside vibes with this one, and really bad room air. Of course the air quality improves with the quality of fuel. Coleman fuel > jet A > unleaded petrol.

  46. U.S. government has a really nice site for solar by Solandri · · Score: 1

    http://pvwatts.nrel.gov/

    It's U.S.-centric, but it also includes data for a lot of major non-U.S. cities. Instead of having to guess how much power your solar panels will generate, the site uses latitude and historical weather data to estimate how much your panels will generate. Northern parts of central Europe (like Germany) tends to have pathetic ROI on solar (capacity factor around 0.10). But for lower latitudes in Central Europe you should be able to hit close to 0.15 - about the average for the continental U.S.

  47. Move to North America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or Russia!

    OK, now that we've got the jokes out of the way, I'd suggest 2 moves. One is local and immediate, the other strategic.

    Local: Install solar panels. It's under your control and the costs are reasonable. Geothermal might be practical depending upon the local geology.

    Strategic #1: Get another source of supply. North America for example has exportable quantities of hydrocarbons. It will require infrastructure development though and that costs big bucks and will take several years (at least). It's not under your personal control and may never happen so plan accordingly.

    Strategic #2: Renewables through your utility. This is most people's preferred long-term solution. Again, big bucks and will take years and you cannot directly control this. It will probably happen in time but you cannot count on any specific timeline.

  48. Buy gas from the US by amightywind · · Score: 0

    You should buy LNG from the United States. My gas bill is super cheap because of frack-gas in North Dakota. By all accounts we are better to do business with than that jerkoff Putin.. Oh, but I forgot. We have a leftist muslim nutjob for a President who stonewalls attempts to export LNG. Hopefully the new GOP majority will soon do something about that.

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
    1. Re:Buy gas from the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. You fuckheads just want to export our resources, while killing manufacturing.
      My suggestion is that you first wipe your mouth PRIOR to moving from one kock brother to the other, and then put a pillow behind your head. It is obvious that they have knocked your brains out, while fucking your mouth.

    2. Re:Buy gas from the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, abundant natural gas is a boon to *domestic* manufacturing. German multinational BASF just created a large plant in Texas because of that. Dow Chemical (a stock I own happily!) is thriving. Cheaper plastics, better materials and additives. Wonderful! As a democrat you must learn to think more than one step ahead. As for the Kock brothers, they play a vital role in the re-industrialization of our country. God bless 'em.

    3. Re:Buy gas from the US by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      Nobody wants to actually EXPORT your precious US LNG. Obama just PROMISES to do so but promises are not supply. And the real price of your LNG will be 1/4 higher than Gazprom's. Who will cover the difference? Europeans. For what cause? You really don't understand for what cause?

  49. foamularTM panels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, determine if the structure is worth keeping. If it is several decades old, has poor insulation, and is breaking, don't invest money in it. If you're a cheap bastard, spend all winter in a coat, with lots of electric blankets around the house. It worked for me.

    If it's a decent structure, with decades more life in it, fill the roof up with fiberglass insulation. I added, an extra 10 inches. Cover all the windows with foamular panels. Tape pieces of panel onto the door.

    If feeling a bit rich, stick in a heat pump, or make sure the existing one is clean. And, keep your server near your bed, for free heating.

    1. Re:foamularTM panels by EdwardFurlong · · Score: 1

      Also you can take advantage of windows and the sun during the day, open the curtains let heat in, close curtains at night.

  50. In Soviet Russia. by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 0, Troll

    Don't.

    You Europeans never had any gas problem with us Euro-loving Russians. All the problems are dying rabid psychotic entity lying over export pipelines and your Brussels bureaucrats galvanizing this cadaver. The North Stream would give you enough gas but it isn't allowed by them. The South Stream would give you enough gas but it isn't allowed to build. And it's YOU who elected them into Brussels. And you know who bribes them to accept an ephemerid LNG from that side of the pond.

    You may buy a really big UPS to survive a short term outage. And I advice you to have some fuel heater (preferably propane one) and some fuel for short term outage. You shall throw them out of Brussels before the long term outage.

    I also recommend a PV panel, heat insulation, triple heat-reflecting windows, etc. But it's secondary.

    1. Re:In Soviet Russia. by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      It was quite amusing to observe score falling from 3 to 0 exactly when the dying rabid psychotic entity awakens on export pipelines and turns on computers.

  51. Substitutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    1: Transport - Petrol (Americans: Gas):
    a) Bicycle: I'm 120kg and I cycle commute about once a week 40km, there are about 5 guys I ride with from my area who do that every day, I think I could do it but I have small children. There are about 40 who commute 25km a day. We have a train but I prefer to cycle when I can.
    b) Electric Car: Leaf, iMiev, Tel$la, etc. You have heaps in Europe or you can convert your own
    c) Wood Gassifier - it's possible to run a petrol car from wood, they did this in the war, takes a bit of space - http://www.woodgas.net/

    2: Heating / Cooling
    a) insulation - saves on any option
    b) electric heat pump / reverse cycle air conditioning
    c) British style coal/wood/woodgas/Kerosene heated furnace plumbed from the roof to radiators in the house
    d) Tank / Storage for coal/wood/Kerosene

    3: Cooking
    a) Gas / Kerosene Camping Stove is ok for a while

    4: Electricity - apart from cooking and heating you aren't using heaps. Heating includes computer servers...
    a) Solar
    b) Battery Backup - old UPS batteries? or LiFePO4
    c) Woodgas / Petrol / Kerosene Generator on the roof + big tank.

  52. Move to Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can't beat them, join them.

  53. Several by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    1) get rid of your politicians. They are as bad as the neo-cons/tea* here in America. These bastards have made us dependent on China. Really bad IDEA.
    2) Ideally, your nation would change their approach to AE. The best thing is to require that all new buildings under 5 stories have enough on-site Alternative energy that EQUALS the amount of energy used for your HVAC (with Heating AND COOLING). In general, that will mean Solar. BUT, it could be others. However, this would get builders to focus on insulation and cheaper means of heating/cooling.
    3) if you are in an older building, then consider a new home. Otherwise, focus on insulation.

    4) Finally, Buy a Nissan leaf, or better, a Tesla. If you do that, it sends a message to ALL car makers that you want electric. At the same time, if you have Solar on your roof, you can rig things so that several circuits are able to run during the daytime via solar, but then run at nighttime, via your electric car. Yes, you can use your electric car as a back-up.

    Did I mention that you should get rid of your politicians? Sadly, we just voted back in the same fuckers that put us in bed with Communists.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  54. One word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Emigrate.

  55. One last thing. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    You really should consider getting coal=>methane conversion going. You can bury the excess CO2. Interestingly, if Germany and Poland were to tap their coal in this fashion, they could provide all of Europe.

    Ideally, America would tap our coal and convert into methane that we can use to keep our prices down, but also export to any nations that Russia decides to screw with.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:One last thing. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Germany has not much coal left, except for lime/brown coal.
      No idea about Poland, but never heared they had noticeable coal supplies.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:One last thing. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Poland is loaded. That is why they do not like kyoto.
      That is also why, when data from OCO2 comes out, the world is in for a major shock.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  56. Very easy: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) bicycle
    2) collective garden
    3) back to the essential

  57. Electricity, wood by codeButcher · · Score: 1

    An acquaintance who lives in Germany once showed me an experimental setup he had: replaced his house's heating with a small generator (sealed unit) that generated electricity as well as heating the house from the waste heat. Apparently it was still allowed to run on the "heating oil" (diesel fuel), while natural "heating" gas-burning versions were available too. So you still get the heat for which the fuel originally was intended, but some electricity as a bonus. You'd still be dependent on a stockpile of fuel though...

    This may not be practical in a densely populated first-world city (with more regulations than sane) but I still like wood as a renewable fuel source for space heating (and emergency cooking). While there are a lot of wood (and coal and even gas) burning stoves being manufactured in various North-European countries (and South American, South Africa, China etc.) Rocket Stove Mass Heaters (which may be googled) seem to be cheaper to construct and cleaner burning - IF you can get the building plans approved.... Retrofitting an existing building can however be a pain.

    --
    Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
  58. Woolpower ? by einar.petersen · · Score: 1

    Wear wool, turn off heating... yeah I know you mentioned wanting heat but think of the free cooling for your electronics that you'd get at the same time... and why is your south facing rooftop not plastered with solar panels already ? I live in an apartment complex (in Europe) and I basically have not been using ambient heat radiators for a year and a half and did not even have to put on the woollen jammies yet. I am guessing your question is more of the rhetorical kind to enlighten fellow slashdotters. On a side note the multiple times I've been in china and in rural areas wool was the solution indoors with room temperatures nearing waters freezing point by a few degrees. People need to get out of their comfort zone. A lot can be done by installing multi layer gold coated thermo glazing in your windows. Wall isolation etc. Look at experimental, zero and even plus energy housing all over Europe. The biggest hurdle against independance is legislation brought on by the energy lobby to curtail initiatives and you see that happening all over the world. Be creative but most of all fight idiotic legislation such as area laws that demand red clay rooftop tiling because you need to fit in with the rest of the "useful idiots" and other laws that curtail freedom and innovative ideas that would keep you from implementing power saving ideas.

    --
    MS, ALS, Aphasia ? http://globability.org - Me http://einarpetersen.com
  59. Lobby your government by Prune · · Score: 1

    Mail your representatives to build modern nuclear reactors. Nuclear has come a long way. Passively safe designs have been around for a while. With a combination of breeder reactors, waste transmutation, and glassification, waste is a non-issue. And let's not forget that nuclear has the lowest number of deaths per Terawatt-hour of energy produced--lower even than wind/solar/hydro**

    **Sources:
    http://webcache.googleusercont...
    http://www.forbes.com/sites/ja...

    --
    "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    1. Re:Lobby your government by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      You forget: the OP lives in europe, likely germany.
      So: no new nuclear reactors.
      Your advice and his mail if he followed it: are pointless.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  60. Re:The number one thing FREE ENERGY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I also live in Europe, and in winter I can often get 1KW output from my 3KWpeak solar array. I use this to drive a 1KW peak consumption Mitsubishi Air-Source-Heat-Pump (reverse cycle air-conditioner, other brands are available) This FREE ENERGY! Heat Pump gives me 3KW effective heating, down to an outside temperature of minus 20 degrees C. How can I pump heat IN at minus twenty? well minus 20 centigrade is actually +253 kelvin, so as you see there are oodles of therms available.

    If you can't fit an PV array - just drive your highly efficient reverse cycle A/C from your direct mains power, it is still free energy, you can spend more and get an air-source-direct-to-heating-water-system. As for having a greener server, sell your current one on eBay & invest in a stack of Macminis or home-brew a DIY server using Bulgarian Olimex microPC's

  61. Meanwhile, in reality... by barcarolle · · Score: 1

    This post is a red herring, pretending to ask about energy ideas while his primary aim is to get front-page Slashdot play for his political viewpoint.

    Meanwhile, in reality, Russia has been trying to diversify supply routes to Europe (see Nord Stream and South Stream) to reduce dependence on unreliable transit countries, those countries being responsible for interruption in the past (and most likely in the future, as well).

    Meanwhile, in reality, the political leadership in most Central and Eastern (not to mention Western) European countries (with very few exceptions) is almost exclusively in bed with (though perhaps "tied up in bed by" is a more accurate analogy) the United States and the UK vis-a-vis their NATO military empire, primarily for banking reasons.

    Meanwhile, in reality, Central European countries have done great work diversifying their energy supply to avoid dependence on one source of energy, which is great.

  62. Re:The number one thing FREE ENERGY! by quenda · · Score: 1

    PV and air-con is fine for reducing your carbon emissions, but it ain't a reliable backup system.

  63. Transportation = food and other goods. by Moskit · · Score: 1

    Anyway, oil dependence is essentially transport based; more specifically, private car use ... That's oil dependance sorted.

    Private car use is just a tiny part of oil use, although the only many people you see directly. Public communication is largely based on oil as well, but it's still not the point.

    Even if you decide to use own muscle power for moving around, there is a bigger problem, especially in large cities - practically all goods are nowadays delivered to shops via road transport. Most important - food. Unless you can find a food source that is not transported by car into the city, you are still pretty much oil dependent.

  64. Solar Panels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ahhah, you know they get a real winter at least in some parts of Germany? Those solar panels will be under a feet of snow and the water tank will burst when it freezes ;-D

  65. foamularTM panels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If it's a decent structure, with decades more life in it, fill the roof up with fiberglass insulation. I added, an extra 10 inches. Cover all the windows with foamular panels. Tape pieces of panel onto the door."

    Or.. like, look up how it's really done by some nations that are actually located in cold climates.

    If you tried to put 10 inches of insulation in my roof or tape some goddamn insulation panels on my windows I'd throw you through my quad glassed window panels, that I can actually see through. The windows are actually done as two units of double glass filled with some gas that won't fog the inside. Doors are already insulated, so they actually remain usable. If you randomly stuff insulation here and there you'll create a moisture problem inside the house.

  66. Easy by xfizik · · Score: 1

    The easiest way to solve problems with gas supply in Europe is to build more pipelines to/from Russia that bypass areas of political instability. Firstly, allow the construction of the South Stream pipeline - paid for in full by Russia. Secondly, open the second half of the OPAL pipeline to Russia. Neither of those options would cost Europe a cent.

  67. Shameless plug for my brother. by miffo.swe · · Score: 1

    My brother has a company that builds wood / biofuel heated stirling engines. You get both electricity and heat so it is very efficient in the winter or whenever you have a heating need, like for hot tap water.

    http://www.inresol.se/the-geni...

    Cool as hell imho. But then ofcourse, im biased :D

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
    1. Re:Shameless plug for my brother. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks neat but you might tell him to fix the datasheet links on the web site.

  68. Not really by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

    Most of our leaders, at least in Germany and Hungary, are in bed with the Russians and likely won't do anything about fuel security.

    I do not know about Hungary, but Germany is heavily investing in the renewable energy.

    Or you expected them to immediately cut the pipes? halt production and transportation? cut the forests to heat the homes?

    --
    All hope abandon ye who enter here.
    1. Re:Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Not really by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

      They are only cutting the subsidies.

      The market has established itself: subsidies are not needed anymore.

      Just like the article says in the third paragragh.

      --
      All hope abandon ye who enter here.
    3. Re:Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are only cutting the subsidies.

      In your original post you said "Germany is heavily investing in the renewable energy".

      The article I quoted incudes things like:

      With renewable energy the only plausible future for Germany’s electricity sector, it seems fair that solar and wind energy sectors contribute to strengthen the power sector.

      In other words, instead of money being invested, money is now being taken out (as taxation).

      The market has established itself: subsidies are not needed anymore.

      Just like the article says in the third paragragh.

      It's really difficult to work out what paragraph you are referring to since the third, as I count it, paragraph says no such thing whilst the second and fourth say something which might be interpreted that way but doesn't say it directly. However, since the critical moment when gas is required in the electricity grid is the moment when renewable energy is at it's lowest, not highest, the article, which suggests renewable capacity at it's maximum is around 30% of Germany's summer needs is very very far from suggesting that Germany has gone far enough to treat renewable as a form of energy security. Probably the peak available power would have to be 150%-200% of Gemany's needs for that to happen.

  69. Re:Communism is the only solution by Pino+Grigio · · Score: 1

    $710 trillion. Now unwind all of those trades and tell me how much it actually is. Also stop watching Prison Planet.

  70. I didn't think Europe had preppers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This post reads like the European version of a crazy American doomsday prepper. Half of his "facts" are just plain wrong, and he's actually terrified of not having heating despite, I presume, being well-off (owning the roof of his building) in a major European city (probably Berlin?).

    Even if Russia and China got together and said "fuck our economies, let's stop exporting energy to Europe" a rich person in a rich city is only going to have to grumble about paying like a thousand euros a year more.

  71. why here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why are you asking slashdot?

    Talk to people who have a clue about this kind of stuff.

  72. Not really a problem by YoungManKlaus · · Score: 1

    For heating, a stove is great, both when it comes to any supposed outages (also of electricity) as well as making for really cosy living. Also wood is pretty cheap and a renewable energy source.

    Depends on if you are more afraid of a power outage or gas crysis ;) You can also use bottled gas for most gas stoves (though you need to configure them for it) which makes you more independent from short-term outages.

  73. Just use diesel! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats what the Swedish environment minister uses so it must be OK.

  74. How about paying you bills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe that is a good way to avoid having your service cut. I works for me but YMMV.

    1. Re:How about paying you bills? by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      Yesterday I've read a news that water facility in Kharkov, Ukraine has been cut off electricity for non-payment. As a result, there is no water in Kharkov. Of course, this news is a Putinist propaganda. But still it does not matter that personally you have paid your water bills.

  75. Gas heating by JabrTheHut · · Score: 1

    It depends on the amount of space you want to heat and how strong your roof is, but large gas bottles (200-500kg) can be bought in my neck of the woods, and there are multiple services that travel to my place to fill them. If access is an issue then multiple smaller bottles may do the trick - it all depends on how long you will be without gas.

    Oh, and insulate your place. Walls, ceiling, windows, even consider the floor.

    --
    Work like no one is watching. Dance like you've never been hurt. Make love like you don't need the money.
  76. serious options by deadweight · · Score: 1

    You really need to move. If you had your own land, you could have a large tank of heating oil or propane. Either one will heat a building and run a generator. There really is nothing else that can store enough energy to do what you want except maybe coal, but a coal operated generator is not an easy thing to DIY. As for where you live right now, you could see how much weight your floors will tolerate and get as many batteries as you can to be charged from the AC mains power and solar on the roof. You could see if it possible for you to have a small generator on the roof. Some of the new camping generators are very quiet. You could maybe have a coal heat stove and store enough coal for a week or two. Do think about how many OTHER problems you will be having if no one else has electricity or heat.

  77. Anti-Russian propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Russians have never threatened to cut off gas to anyone. Who is posting this rubbish? Is this paid propaganda?
    Firstly, the Chinese will certainly never have trouble with Russian gas supplies. The pipeline there goes directly from Russia to China, not through some corrupt nightmare, like Ukraine.
    Secondly, Russian gas is delivered through Ukraine, which has been routinely stealing Russian gas for some time, and has massive gas debts to Russia. It is Ukraine that is abusing its position as a transit country, to try and apply leverage to get a better gas price. This won't work for two reasons: the EU will not allow Ukraine to endanger European gas supplies, and secondly Russia will build alternative pipelines, so that Ukraine is no longer able to behave in this way.
    For anyone who believed the anti-Russian propaganda, you can stop worrying, and go back to life as normal.

  78. Build a Gasifier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Build a Gasifier like your grandparents did during the war

    http://www.woodgasifierplans.com/

  79. Lebenswagen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True. You should better revamp your lifestyle.

    Sadly, the site is only in German but there are lots of pictures from their alternative community:

    http://www.lebenswagen.nirgendwo.info/bilder.html

    They promote living in a contractor's shed, use wodd-fired ovens (for cooking), have upperstairs winter gardens designed after its own self-heating capabilities, use solar-powered Laptops and generally try to attenuate their overall energy footprint.

    While living in a contractr's shed is truely not for everyone, you may still adpat some of their findings which are sometimes very creative and tought-provoking!

    Here is more (in German):

    http://blog.eichhoernchen.fr/tag/Lebenswagen

  80. Relocate to Russia. by horsh · · Score: 1

    Have you already considered just relocatiing to Russia?

    1. Re:Relocate to Russia. by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      Don't. We Russians will survive everything. You won't.

  81. Translation into English: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi, I am a debil from Prague and my brain has been thoroughly washed with Ariel, Persil, Tide, et al. Since Russians won't sell their oil and gas to anyone, not even the Chinese (according to news media, which I obediently trust and believe), what can I do about my energy independence in a city with narrow gullies, uneven gusts of wind due to Prague's rugged landscape and with roof shaded from sun rays by surrounding hills? Please help me! I am a stupid Czech!

  82. FUD for the Russian fossil fuel industry? by matbury · · Score: 1

    The OP initially sounds plausible and hooks enough readers in with an interesting but ultimately unsolveable problem. The bit where he says, "..and my server keeps running." is guaranteed to score brownie points with /.-ers. The Russian fossil fuel industry is in the business of making money and it's not going to allow anything get in the way of it maximising its profits. Unstable, irregular energy supplies on their part will encourage consumer countries to increase investments in alternative sources, e.g. wind, solar, and geothermal, and supplies (other pipelines). That's the last thing they want. Irregular and more expensive energy supplies would also affect the competitiveness of their customer countries' economies, thereby further reducing their ability to pay top dollar for their energy.

    This post appears to be pure FUD. I'm not exactly sure what the OP is trying to do but it's not at all convincing.

  83. Re:drill for nothing and frack whose land? by thrig · · Score: 1

    The high cost of oil and low interest rates (and being completely and totally addicted to oil) are more compelling reasons why America went bonkers for Bakkenpuffs; the recent price dip should be a good test to determine just how resilient those producers are, and to see who is out swimming sans skivvies. Also, the population density is rather higher in Europe, which may nix or upsize the costs of any fracking, depending on where those hypothetical fields might be located (there was a recent 96% slaughter of the reserves projected for the Monterey Shale, fluffy optimism and bad data being hallmarks of this field), and the land usage rights would also need delving into. So whatever "new" methods there might be may not fly at all in the EU, assuming that there is profitable oil to be had—for example, how are those fields in Poland panning out? Hmm, hmm, "Fracking Setback in Poland Dims Hope for Less Russian Gas." Righty, then. Consider also the brutal decline rates of fracked wells; Rune Likvern has written several times on the "Red Queen Running" state required to keep the tight oil party flowing.

  84. Propane heater by EdwardFurlong · · Score: 1

    I would just get something like a Mr heater propane heater. Safe to run indoors, propane is easy to store.
    It's not going to be a good solution to get you through an entire winter, but should get you through minor outages, it's also way less costly and complex than some of the other ideas mentioned.
    If possible I would get a wood stove, I have one, the initial cost was pretty steep but all I need to keep it going is wood which is nice.

  85. BSG, Farscape, Red Dwarf by tepples · · Score: 2

    Hmm, hmm, "Fracking Setback in Poland Dims Hope for Less Russian Gas."

    Why not "Frelling" or "Smegging" setback?

    1. Re:BSG, Farscape, Red Dwarf by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Hmm, hmm, "Fracking Setback in Poland Dims Hope for Less Russian Gas."

      Why not "Frelling" or "Smegging" setback?

      Because "fracking" comes from an abbreviation of tedious engineering terms in one field of research ("hydraulic fracturing" in drilling engineering), while "smegging" is an euphemism invented in a totally unrelated field (from "smegma", a medical term, in the field of entertainment).

      I don't know if "frelling" is a technical term in drilling engineering, or a contraction of such ; if it is, I don't recognise it's derivation and would appreciate an explanation of how it's appropriate. If it's an euphemism from the entertainment industry, what the fuck has that to do with engineering terminology?

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  86. Bike rack far from door by tepples · · Score: 1

    With a bicycle, you still need to walk from the vehicle parking space to the door if a place has no bike rack or if a bike rack isn't very close to the door. At a lot of large shops, the only thing remotely resembling a bike rack is the shopping cart return in the parking lot.

    1. Re:Bike rack far from door by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      Then you chain your bike into a cluster of shopping carts stuck around one of the anti-ram-raid pillars and when the management complain ask them to put the bike racks a bit closer to the doors. Possibly even as part of the anti-ram-raid equipment. And if they still don't like it, go in, do your shopping, then leave it at the checkout, unpaid for, saying that you think it is too far to carry out to your so-distant bike.

      It takes time, years, but eventually they get the message.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  87. Victory garden by tepples · · Score: 1

    Unless you can find a food source that is not transported by car into the city

    There used to be something called a victory garden, a vegetable garden on one's own urban property, but some cities have tried to outlaw that.

  88. Now feed the animals by tepples · · Score: 1

    Now feed the animals. Good luck.

  89. Re:The number one thing FREE ENERGY! by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

    Are you personally paying any money for your personal carbon emission? And BTW: The greens state that the forests are the lungs of the planet but pray tell me Sir, where does the carbon goes after it's trapped by trees?

    And also: The efficiency of heat pump seriously depends on the temperature difference. It may give you 3 KW heat per KW spent in spring and autumn but not in winter.

  90. Make your own gas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will be more difficult where you live, but you should be able to build a waste-to-methane system such as are commonly used in South America.

    In those places, where it's easy, you just put a plastic cover over a trench full of goat shit and let the sun do the work for you. The aromatics burn off without stinking up the house (with purchased methane, odorants are actually added but you won't need to). Those kinds of places don't have to worry about explosion and fire hazard much, because the system can be set outdoors well away from the point of use.

    You will have a harder job, since you'll have to do in a more contained & insulated space, but it can be done if you're up to the challenge.

  91. And glaring misconception about China-Russia deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From TFS:

    China's time will come in later years

    How utterly blind. China doesn't need Russia's gas and oil, nor will they need it later when the infrastructure needed to realize their recent energy deal has been completed. China will use Russian energy as long as the cost (monetary and political) is acceptable. China will never put itself at Russia's mercy; just review the history between these two countries.

    OTOH, China might allow Russia to become dependent to a great extent on China's gas/oil purchases, seeming to accept short-term costs as a matter of long-term strategic interests. Upon hearing of the deal, I immediately wondered if Putin had relegated future Russia into becoming a vassal state of future China. Either way, it's no good for the West.

    - T

  92. Viability of renewables by Hypotensive · · Score: 1

    Whether renewables will work in isolation for you is going to depend on a number of other variables, such as how big the space you need to heat is under your roof, how big the roof is, and the thermal efficiency of the building.

    Even in Central Europe during winter you should be able to generate 1kW from around 8m2 of solar photovoltaic panel. That 1kW is sufficient to power a heat pump capable of providing around 3kW of heat. You can do your own calculations about how much you would need to scale that up by based on your own space measurements.

    As others have said everyone can benefit from using solar thermal to heat their hot water. For a short while now there's been a new technology called thermodynamic panels that combine solar thermal technology and a small compressor, working a little like an air-to-air heat pump. These are highly efficient and depending on how much hot water storage you have you might be able to pump it through a radiator system to provide central heating. Again for an off-grid solution you'd need PV to provide the baseline power for it, but it would be in the order of magnitude capable of being supplied by solar.

    Lastly, depending on how much control you have you might be able to rebuild or rework the actual building construction. If you can do this to a high enough level you might consider a Passivhaus which would drastically reduce the space heating requirements.

  93. Improve the building insulation first by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

    If your building does not have them already get double-glazed windows and insulate the roof. Use centralized heating. Either heat-pump based or a propane or diesel boiler. I say propane or diesel because it is denser and easier to transport and most of it in Europe comes from petrofuels of the Middle East rather than Russian natural gas reserves. Burning wood or coal is nice if you live in the middle of nowhere but if everyone started doing this in cities atmospheric pollution would get worse just like it was in the XIXth century. Check where your electricity comes from if it is natural gas or coal. You might not actually have a problem at all. Get an UPS for your PC and surge protection for every major appliance because I think it is more likely you will have rolling blackouts than actual total grid failure.