Slashdot Mirror


Amazon's Echo: a $200, Multi-Function, Audio-Centric Device

An anonymous reader writes Amazon today quietly unveiled a new product dubbed Amazon Echo. The $200 device appears to be a voice-activated wireless speaker that can answer your questions, offer updates on what's going in the world, and of course play music. Echo is currently available for purchase via an invite-only system. If you have Amazon Prime, however, you can get it for $100. I've put in a request for one; hopefully we'll get a hands-on look at the Echo soon. It looks useful and interesting for random searches, and for controlling devices, but one small speaker (interesting driver arrangement notwithstanding) doesn't bode well for "fill[ing] any room with immersive sound," as Amazon's promo materials claim.

129 comments

  1. Amazon has officially gone Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Now we got two giants churning out failure after failure

    1. Re:Amazon has officially gone Google by aztracker1 · · Score: 2

      Their sales (of other company's goods) are still very much in the black... iirc, aws is too... where they seem to be failing is in capturing an open market for their hardware. TBH, they really need to clean up their interfaces for the video/audio services, and offer their apps for regular Android devices, or get the play store on theirs.

      They'd only need to cut their own hardware (beyond the kindle), and possibly their streaming services and they could be well into the black.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    2. Re:Amazon has officially gone Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AWS is actually losing money hand over fist.

    3. Re:Amazon has officially gone Google by edremy · · Score: 1

      Is it? My understanding is that AWS is in large part the excess capacity Amazon needs for peak times, so otherwise the hardware sits around unused. AWS is just getting something out of that. Am I wrong here?

      --
      "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
    4. Re: Amazon has officially gone Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, they should go back to selling books and CDs.

      Wait. What are books and CDs?

    5. Re:Amazon has officially gone Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not any more. AWS is a big business that came into existence because the processes to use the hardware were so well developed for the internal use that they could open it up as a paid service to the outside world. It has grown way beyond the computing needs of amazon and is used by sites like netflix, pinterest, airbnb and many many more.

  2. It looks a lot like Ivee by laird · · Score: 2

    It looks a lot like Ivee (http://www.helloivee.com) which was Kickstarted a while back. Ivee costs much less, and integrates with home automation gear (Hue, Nest, etc.), which is useful. It doesn't stream internet audio, though. So it'll be interesting to see how they compete.

    1. Re:It looks a lot like Ivee by Gothmolly · · Score: 4, Funny

      Except its kickstarter, so some douchebeard will keep all or most of your money while mailing you a Debian CD in return.

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    2. Re:It looks a lot like Ivee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ivee costs much less

      Ivee is $199. How is that much less than Echo's price of $199? Also, if you have Prime, Echo is only $99, which is much less than Ivee.

    3. Re:It looks a lot like Ivee by tehcyder · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Douchebeard" is my nomination for word of the year.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    4. Re:It looks a lot like Ivee by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

      Looks far more like a smarter version of Sonos, at the same price point.

    5. Re:It looks a lot like Ivee by radl33t · · Score: 1

      looks like ivee costs $199.99 to me.

    6. Re:It looks a lot like Ivee by laird · · Score: 1

      Funny, but not true - they actually shipped the units, and they work well.

    7. Re:It looks a lot like Ivee by laird · · Score: 1

      Sorry, you're right. Ivee was $149 on Kickstarter, which is less than the $199 Echo. But now it's retailing for $199, same as Echo, My bad.

  3. Nice by Charliemopps · · Score: 1, Funny

    Echo as in, Echo the Fires miserable failure? Because if that's what you're trying to do... good job!

    Seriously, it seems that recently Amazon must have fired the guy with all the common sense.

    1. Re:Nice by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 3, Funny

      Echo as in, Echo the Fires miserable failure?

      I was hoping for Echo and the Bunnymen, actually. I guess the Bunnymen cost extra.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:Nice by The+Living+Fractal · · Score: 1

      This thing is gonna sell like hotcakes @ $100. I'll probably get two. You need to wake up, sir, the future is coming. ;)

      --
      I do not respond to cowards. Especially anonymous ones.
    3. Re:Nice by lgw · · Score: 1

      I won't buy any voice activated device until I can choose the "name" that activates it. Half the fun is using "pigfucker" as the name.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    4. Re:Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're buying this one?

    5. Re:Nice by lgw · · Score: 1

      Oh, can you set the "name"? Sounded like it was hard-coded on Alexa?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    6. Re:Nice by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Yes, apparently you can. Jarvis will be popular, but I'm sorely tempted to go with "hey, asshole".

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    7. Re:Nice by TheAngryArmadillo · · Score: 1

      This is the correct answer. I loved those books so much.

    8. Re:Nice by lgw · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, for a serious choice I might go with "Gay Deceiver" - old school.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    9. Re:Nice by rochrist · · Score: 1

      Eh. All they have to do is avoid using those awful awful kids in their Echo ads. "I've been on the surf for 8 years..."

  4. Amazon has officially gone Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real question is how much money can Amazon actually lose each month selling really bad electronics and the rest of their services below cost?

    Remember when these guys just sold books and CDs? That actually worked for them.

  5. Need Majel's voice by wiredlogic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This would be perfect if it only had a faithful synthesis of Majel Barrett's voice.

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    1. Re:Need Majel's voice by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      This would be perfect if it only had a faithful synthesis of Majel Barrett's voice.

      She's not very available for new voice work anymore...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:Need Majel's voice by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      There has been significant work on synthesizing real people's voices without their cooperation. There is a large enough body of her recorded voice to work from.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    3. Re:Need Majel's voice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had zero interest in this device until this suggestion was made. Thanks, now I'm not sure that I can live without it.

    4. Re:Need Majel's voice by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      Hello 93 Escort Wagon. You.. really know... how to... turn. me. on.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    5. Re:Need Majel's voice by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      They should have had her record every english phoneme... then they could just synthesize her. It's not a proper talking computer unless it has her voice.

      Or failing that, just get Marina Sirtis.

    6. Re:Need Majel's voice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're kidding, right? Troi was the most annoying character in TNG for all seven seasons, only becoming mildly annoying to listen to after about season three.

    7. Re:Need Majel's voice by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Blame Roddenberry for the annoying earli Ilia...I mean Troi. One of the most hated Troi-centric TNG episodes in Season 2 was a Star Trek Phase II script intended for Lt. Ilia

      But the reason I mentioned Sirtis was one of those fan-made trek shows used Sirtis for the computer voice. I thought she did a good job, surprised me.

      http://www.startrekcontinues.c...

  6. Jack of all trades by thammoud · · Score: 2

    Masters of only one (Let Kindle Slide). Online Shopping. I simply do not understand all of these devices that Amazon is trying to pimp. Phones? Tablets? I love shopping at Amazon but their brain dead hardware makes zero sense.

    1. Re:Jack of all trades by R.Mo_Robert · · Score: 1

      Masters of only one (Let Kindle Slide). Online Shopping. I simply do not understand all of these devices that Amazon is trying to pimp. Phones? Tablets? I love shopping at Amazon but their brain dead hardware makes zero sense.

      I actually like the Fire TV--it supports everything I need (I like Apple, but I'm not invested in iTunes movie purchases and rentals, and Amazon Prime is quite nice for both movies and TV), and it can side-load Android apps, which isn't always useful but is at least a little fun. The Fire TV Stick, recently released and much cheaper, might also be nice, but I haven't used it. I actually returned my Roku for this. As you possibly hint, the Kindle is also a nice device, though I mean the e-ink variety rather than the tablets (which may also be nice, but I have never used them but suspect I would much prefer my own tablet with the Kindle app, which I currently use if I want an LCD).

      As for the Echo, if it can be used as a high-quality speaker, I can see it being useful for that, though it would be nice to have a physical connection rather than Bluetooth. Its intended main function sounds neat, but I'm not sure it will be that useful (and I'm not sure how I feel about having an always-on mic, even if it presumably doesn't transmit anything to Amazon unless it thinks you've beckoned it).

      --
      R.Mo
    2. Re:Jack of all trades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I would have purchased a Fire-TV device since all our viewing is on Amazon Prime Instant Video. I wanted a device with head phones so that the TV sound would not wake my spouse. The Fire-TV does have a head phone jack. The new Roku device does and I purchased that one instead.

      If the Echo can used as a Bluetooth speaker with an iPad, it would be a good deal since name brand Bluetooth speakers are generally more than $100.

    3. Re:Jack of all trades by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Masters of only one (Let Kindle Slide). Online Shopping. I simply do not understand all of these devices that Amazon is trying to pimp.

      I think you do. You just don't realize that these are tools for online shopping. Buy a Kindle, get all of your ebooks from Amazon because it doesn't support Epub, which is what all of the other online bookstores are using. Buy a Fire or a Kindle HD, get your apps and your movies and your music from Amazon because even though it's Android, it doesn't come with Google Play. Amazon sells a lot of real-world things, but if people are buying digital things now then Amazon wants to make sure it sells a lot of those, too.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    4. Re:Jack of all trades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The game that came pre-loaded on the Fire TV didn't suck. It was fun to play.

    5. Re:Jack of all trades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if it can be used specifically as a BT speaker, but the website says it will stream audio from IOS and android devices.

    6. Re:Jack of all trades by RockClimbingFool · · Score: 1

      While I watch plenty of content from Amazon Prime, Netflix and HBOgo, the lack of an officially supported USB port to play media single handedly caused me to buy a Roku 3, instead of a Fire TV.

    7. Re:Jack of all trades by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      Buy a Kindle, get all of your ebooks from Amazon because it doesn't support Epub, which is what all of the other online bookstores are using.

      Or, you could always do this.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    8. Re:Jack of all trades by Grizzley9 · · Score: 1

      I mainly use my AppleTV for Netflix on my non-smart tv as well as streaming Hulu from my iPhone to it via PlayOn. I don't buy any movies via iTunes either.

    9. Re:Jack of all trades by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Sure you could... if you like having to take extra steps every time you get a new book before you can read it. Maybe you don't care; technical issues like this are easy for us nerds, but most people just want things to work without hassle.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    10. Re:Jack of all trades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couldn't you just have used the headphone jack on the tv?

  7. i got an invite... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I scored an invite, though don't have the device yet. Looks to be useful for searches while working on cars, with greasy hands where you don't want to grime up your laptop. Mount an Echo on the garage wall, and search away!

  8. Plays Fruit Ninja as well as the Kinect by uCallHimDrJ0NES · · Score: 5, Funny

    You just shout "SLICE! CHOP! SLICE!" at it and it makes fruit slicing noises and tells you afterwards how well you did. When you're not using it, it quietly keeps a compressed log of human presence information and keyword flags that get sent to Amazon's supercustomers. Just like the Kinect, but no Xbox required. Awesome innovation.

    --
    Cloudiot: A person who does not see offsite storage as a way to lose control over access to his or her own data.
    1. Re:Plays Fruit Ninja as well as the Kinect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a rule, "Always have an open mic in the room". I have had trouble doing it 24/7. Thank you Amazon!!

  9. In three months it will be .99 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Based on prior history of Amazon's ability to tie hardware and software into devices I would hold off on the purchase.

  10. Discount = Fee by The+New+Guy+2.0 · · Score: 1

    Amazon Prime costs $99 a year, and this device is $100 off if you have that...

    1. Re:Discount = Fee by xaotikdesigns · · Score: 1

      Well, buying the device for $200 gets you the device. Getting a Prime membership gets you discounted shipping, free ebooks, streaming video, and $100 off. So it's not quite as simple as you put it.

      --
      XDInd
    2. Re:Discount = Fee by The+New+Guy+2.0 · · Score: 1

      The point is, that's an "inversion"... it's cheaper to accept all the goodness of Prime than to pay full price for the device.

    3. Re:Discount = Fee by rochrist · · Score: 1

      Well, plus it's a lot more useful if you DO have Prime.

  11. Quietly? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    If you go to amazon.com, you'll see a ginormous advert taking a big chunk out of the very top of the page.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Quietly? by xaotikdesigns · · Score: 2

      This is the first I ever heard about it. Do you remember the press releases and viral campaign leading up to this release? No? Then it's been pretty quiet, hasn't it?

      --
      XDInd
    2. Re:Quietly? by Noughmad · · Score: 1

      Nowadays quietly just means nobody "accidentally" lost one in a bar.

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
    3. Re:Quietly? by rochrist · · Score: 1

      Quiet meaning there wasn't an ad campaign before the ad campaign started, or quiet in that there were no rumors about it?

  12. Re:Play it safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, out of mod points.

  13. All your data (and you) belong Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Gee - 30-some comments and not one about privacy concerns. An always-on mic in my house? I think not!

    1. Re:All your data (and you) belong Amazon by DrunkenTerror · · Score: 1

      I prefer to keep my always-on speaker in my pants pocket (except when I'm wearing girl glothes).

    2. Re:All your data (and you) belong Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because the word "privacy" wasn't used? Some comments prior to yours are about privacy (or the lack thereof).

  14. One of the features is "always on" by mi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Connected to the cloud so it's always getting smarter

    Suppose, you are disciplining your child, or singing in the shower, or having a tender moment with your spouse... The device listens — and is connected to the cloud "getting smarter".

    Will it start offering suggestions? Will it start reminding us to wash hands — if it hears flushing, but not running water in the sink? Will it call police upon detecting "domestic violence" — and wouldn't Amazon some day be sued for not doing so?

    The Big Brother we were warned about nearly 100 years ago, does not necessarily need to be entirely for monitoring — the watching interface could also deliver weather reports and other useful information.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:One of the features is "always on" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For $100 ($200 with prime) - You invite NSA into to home and listen all the time!

    2. Re: One of the features is "always on" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shall we presume that you either don't have a cell phone, or that you remove the battery when you get home?

    3. Re:One of the features is "always on" by mianne · · Score: 1

      The fact that the "Wake-up" command is Alexa which happens to be the name of one of the original web data mining firms seems like an unfortunate confluence. We may have crossed the privacy Rubicon with the mass acceptance of smartphones, but placing a cloud-connected device inside our homes to monitor all conversations is much too creepy for me.

      --
      Javascript, cookies, flash, and ActiveX must be enabled in order to view this sig.
    4. Re:One of the features is "always on" by sootman · · Score: 1

      > Suppose, you are... having a tender moment with your spouse... The device
      > listens... Will it start offering suggestions?

      "Hey! Moron! She said 'faster' like ten times already!"

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    5. Re:One of the features is "always on" by rthille · · Score: 1

      > Will it start reminding us to wash hands — if it hears flushing, but not running water in the sink?
      That would be awesome! It'd save me yelling it at my GF's two boys (9 & 12)...

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
  15. Looks like it might make a good speakerphone by rwa2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you actually scroll down the page a http://www.amazon.com/oc/echo you'll see it actually has two speakers, a "woofer" and a tweeter.

    More interesting is the array of 7 mics. Should be possible to get some good positional audio capture and noise reduction that way.

    I picked up an el-cheapo bluetooth speaker/mic a while ago, and it works decently enough. I can see people paying 10x more for a "premium" version of something like http://www.amazon.com/Wireless... I suppose... "Real" speakerphones for conference rooms with good NC and AEC are pretty expensive.

    1. Re:Looks like it might make a good speakerphone by tysonedwards · · Score: 2

      The multiple microphone array is to allow the device to perform beam forming, thereby performing noise suppression as well as analyzing the location of the sound relative to the device.

      --
      Thirty four characters live here.
  16. Can I change the wake up keyword? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'd like to say WTF? Over.

    1. Re: Can I change the wake up keyword? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Especially since my girlfriend also happens to be Alexa, this may be an issue...

    2. Re: Can I change the wake up keyword? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Good training for you before you marry her

  17. Pay $200 to be spyed upon? by Noishkel · · Score: 0

    No thanks. I'm not willing trade even more privacy by paying Amazon $200 to listen in to everything I do just in case I might want it to display something on the screen for me.

    1. Re:Pay $200 to be spyed upon? by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 2

      Agreed. If it did not spy, it might be a neat gadget, but you just can't be sure, especially as it is networked connected and apparently always updating itself. I worked on the IBM Personal Speech Assistant, a small handheld device that did speech recognition for command-and-control, in the late 1990s, but it had a push-to-talk button. Of course, we are so surrounded these days with devices with microphones and cameras which auto-update (cell phones, laptops, tablets) that it is becoming harder to know what any of them are doing. But I'm assuming this system explicitly sends audio over the network to Amazon. Maybe it has special hardware to not send audio unless you say the keyword? When I was musing about building speech recognition into a physical keyboard, we talked about that idea at IBM as a way to save power, with special low-power hardware to listen for just one keyword without needing to wake up the entire system. Anyway, this privacy issue needs thinking through...

      Also, there is some other social aspect of it that feels weird somehow. The video about it with the white Yuppi couple with three kids (or was one a babysitter?) was a little creepy in some ways, since Echo is made to look almost like a new person joining the family, taking the role of an unmarried aunt or uncle, say. Perhaps this device subconsciously addresses a need unfulfilled by the USA's lack of an extended family living together (which has been the historic norm during human history, like in longhouses)? Is there an implication that this device might end up pushing real people out of the home, like when the dad has to ask how to spell "cantaloupe", displaced by a device...
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E...
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L...
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C...

      It's also strange how the video shows it in several rooms, like either people move it or they bought several? Somehow a physical robot might not feel as weird -- although it would have the same privacy and social issues or more because a robot could move things. From a top Google match or robots and privacy:
      "Robots and Privacy - American University Washington College of Law"
      https://www.wcl.american.edu/p...
      "M. Ryan Calo, "Robots and Privacy," in Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics (Patrick Lin, George Bekey, and Keith Abney, eds.) (Cambridge: MIT Press, forthcoming) ... It is not hard to imagine why robots raise privacy concerns. Practically by definition, robots are equipped with the ability to sense, process, and record the world around them (Denning et al 2008; Singer 2009, 67). Robots can go places humans cannot go, see things humans cannot see. Robots are, first and foremost, a human instrument. And after industrial manufacturing, the principle use to which we've put that instrument has been surveillance. ... There are a number of different ways one might categorize or group the impact of robotics on privacy. This chapter breaks the effects into three categories--direct surveillance, access, and social meaning--with the goal of introducing the reader to a wide variety of issues. Where possible, the chapter points toward ways in which we might mitigate or redress the potential impact of robots on privacy, but acknowledges that in some cases redress will be difficult under the current state of privacy law. ..."

      Anyway, we'll see how this plays out with Echo as a sort of robot without hands...

      There are a lot of things I like about Amazon (ignoring employment conditions for packers), even its Kindle hardware, but the Fire phone and now this seem like overreach. That is not because they are not interesting products, but more because, as

      --
      A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
    2. Re:Pay $200 to be spyed upon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well then you're in luck, because there is no screen.

  18. Tied to Amazon services by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    All indications on this device is it is going to be tightly wound into Amazon's services. Unless it has an open API as well, it's going to be dead in the water, because me telling amazon to "Remind me to get milk tomorrow" is not very useful when it has no integration to my Google or Apple calendar.

    The second barrier is, all this thing can do can already be done by Google Now. So you are competing with a device people already have in their pocket.

    Anyway it will be interesting to see if it works out for Amazon.

    1. Re:Tied to Amazon services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's also simply a gadget to do things that are trivial. I don't see the big deal here

  19. Re:Play it safe by rmdingler · · Score: 1
    Indeed.

    It is said the average human life of 76 produces 1.5 years on the toilet. I'd like to believe I've done some good thinking and improving during that goodly bit of quiet time.

    If we can do nothing else productive with our cumulative years on /., we ought to be able to convince folks to type in their own url. Crikey!

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  20. The answer to all my prayers! by sootman · · Score: 1

    So if I'm at home AND I'm in the same room with it AND I don't have my phone in my pocket AND it's otherwise quiet in the room, I can totally ask it stuff. SIGN ME UP!

    This will be so great for all those times that I'm standing alone in my living room with my hands full and I suddenly need to know "what's 28 degrees fahrenheit in celsius?"

    Seriously, Amazon, just throw this useless piece of shit into the bargain bin with the Microsoft Kin and the Google Nexus Q and the Facebook Phone and oh yeah the Amazon Fire Phone. Call me in a few months when they announce what the write-down is on this turd.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:The answer to all my prayers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would it matter if you have your phone in your pocket? And why would it only be useful when your hands are full?

  21. Re:You heard it hear by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Your every spoken word reverberates back at the Amazon.com mother roach.

    Just like your every spoken word on your cellphone and computer microphone goes to Microsoft, Apple, and/or the NSA.

  22. 3COM's Audrey by linuxrunner · · Score: 0, Troll

    Did Amazon think that 3com's Audrey aka the web appliance did fail hard enough?

    and because pressing a button on your phone that's in your pocket will be more work than you're willing to put in to remember a task.

    --
    www.slightlycrewed.com - Because aren't we all?
    1. Re:3COM's Audrey by binarylarry · · Score: 3, Funny

      Alexa mod parent troll

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    2. Re:3COM's Audrey by eWarz · · Score: 1

      Wish i had mod points.

  23. Voice-only might work by iamacat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It could be that losing screen is as essential for voice interface as losing keyboard and stylus was for multitouch tablets. Not in a technical sense, but to get both users and developers to embrace new way of interacting and discover what works. I see this working very well with kids, especially if wrapped in a cute toy and an age-appropriate content selection. If nothing else, this device will have terrific accessibility for blind users.

    If only NSA didn't spoil the fun by displaying complete disregard for law and common sense! Now people will never trust the hotword detection and assume it can be overridden from remote to listen all the time.

    1. Re:Voice-only might work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I was able to work with aural interfaces in college back in the mid 90's. The main problem is context. The computer has to maintain context of the conversation in much the same way humans do. Otherwise you just end up with a variation of "phone menu hell".

      It's interesting that very little advancement has been made in actually conversing with your computer. Forget speech recognition, it would be incredible if I could type a conversational style paragraph of instructions and the computer would understand enough to carry them out.
      Instead, everyone is too focused on speech recognition.

    2. Re:Voice-only might work by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Forget speech recognition, it would be incredible if I could type a conversational style paragraph of instructions and the computer would understand enough to carry them out.

      something like:

      computer, do the following:
      start xfce4-terminal, and connect to nethack.alt.org
      start claws-mail, and check mail
      Open Firefox to Slashdot;


      #!/bin/sh
      exec xfce4-terminal -e 'telnet -8 nethack.alt.org'&
      exec claws-mail --receive-all&
      exec firefox --new-tab http://slashdot.org/

      Admittedly it's not natural language.

    3. Re:Voice-only might work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Given that the average person will never care about the privacy issues, this technology is coming and you and I (or at least, our children) have no real choice to avoid it short of moving to the woods and becoming hermits.

      So the only real way to tackle it is to ensure it can't be abused by setting up extremely strict privacy laws, and burning at the stake any politician who breathes otherwise.

    4. Re:Voice-only might work by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Even if the NSA was out of the equation, there's always some #@$hole out there who'll hack your stuff anyway... whether for gain (blackmail) or fun... you can't win.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    5. Re:Voice-only might work by iamacat · · Score: 1

      Then his #@$hole will suffer in PMITA federal penitentiary and I can get lifelock and refunds for any charges. It's when law enforcement itself is corrupt all the way to the highest levels in the country that there is a big problem.

    6. Re:Voice-only might work by Utens · · Score: 1

      In this days they develop new devices child or proof or for child, nothing in the middle of the two.

  24. Siri on a Stick by rjejr · · Score: 1

    They really should have called this Siri on a Stick. Maybe SOS for short. Amazon SOS sounds better than Echo. What echo?

    1. Re:Siri on a Stick by mi · · Score: 1

      Siri on a Stick

      You are onto something here. Can't say, I got a bona-fide erection imagining Siri in such a situation, but there is that refreshing feeling of solidity, yes...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  25. WARNING: referral in link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Wow. Just wow. Some AC probably just made a shitload of cash by tricking mods into upvoting his peronsal referrral link (hint: that's what the ref_=blahblah part is).
    http://www.amazon.com/oc/echo works just fine without the referral.

    1. Re:WARNING: referral in link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd mod you up if I could.

    2. Re:WARNING: referral in link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. amazon.com/echo actually redirects to the URL in the grandparent.

  26. Troi's Mom by rossdee · · Score: 1

    Can't she just read your mind anyway

  27. Too Late For Amazon by rossdee · · Score: 1

    Its about 5 weeks too late for Amazon - I have had to reduce my spending there since they now charge sales tax.

  28. Re:You heard it hear by kenwd0elq · · Score: 1

    The only difference, of course, is that we don't expect your cell phone or tablet to relay EVERY word to the NSA. The "Echo" device would appear to do just that. We always suspected that Big Brother was going to subcontract the work; now we know who got the bid!

  29. Re:You heard it hear by FreeRadicalX · · Score: 1

    Not sure if you're saying that makes it OK, or if you just wanted to point that out.

  30. Hello... by thedarb · · Score: 1

    I'm Wiki Bear!

    --
    This sig intentionally left blank.
  31. Get one for my girlfriend by Dashiva+Dan · · Score: 1

    All it needs to say is "Yes Dear" and give compliments, save me a lifetime of grief. Of course, it'll also need to learn how to apologise when it's right... That might be a bit trickier.

    --
    "lt;dr" is the correct response to most of my posts.
  32. Re:You heard it hear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Firewall the crap out of it. And force it through a proxy server that can manage upload quotas (i.e.: squid)

  33. Re:Play it safe by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    Now, go ahead and mod me down.

    Looks like someone is in need of a spanking.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  34. It *claims* to only be listening after the trigger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right there in the advert is the problem, it says "echo only listens after you say the chosen keyword", yet to hear the keyword echo must be listening in all the time.

    So what you've got there is (yet another) remote controlled spying device, This one has 7 mics! Like Fire phone had 4 cameras that watched your every facial expression as you see Amazon products to see how you react to them, this one can listen out for important word like "Lets go buy...[stuff]", "My company just bid [$$$] on contract [business]", "I hate the President", and other important things to listen out for!

    Beware, your smartphone already does this. Samsungs and other makers come with apps, Sammys is DSMLawMo that remotely turns on cameras, mics, read files, access the local network, change your network settings, read SMSs, send SMSs pretending to be you that are not shown to you, read apps, run apps.... You cannot turn it off.

    These devices are a privacy disaster.

  35. Re:Play it safe by tlhIngan · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Go to http://www.amazon.com/oc/echo/ AFFILIATE DELETED directly instead of trusting that URL above. While the URL above may be safe, we don't need to be teaching people to click on just any link if it's on a trusted source.

    I see what you did there... (when you get a "ref=" part in an Amazon URL, it means it's an affiliate link.)

    Nice cheap way to earn a few extra bucks by using your own affiliate link, I see, all in the guise of "web surfing safety".

  36. Re:You heard it hear by putaro · · Score: 1

    I don't think it will work without a pretty wide-open connection to Amazon. All of those queries that we saw were not being satisfied by the local box. The shopping list was internet connected. That thing is not going in my house.

  37. Re: It *claims* to only be listening after the tri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Get one of these and then play nothing but movies with terrorists in them right by the mic.

  38. Re:Play it safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Actually ref= is for the referrer. Amazon uses this to track from which page users are coming from. It's redundant when the HTTP referer is there, but it's still helpful for links shared outside or posted on other websites, etc.

    Affiliate links have a tag= URL parameter, not ref=.

  39. Telescreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Together with a TV this is a perfect telescreen.

  40. Cheap way to give the NSA access to your home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I understand correctly this device will listen to everything you say and send it to Amazon's servers so it can be interpreted as a command. Doesn't anybody realize what a stupid idea this? I don't want a device in my home that surveillances me and directly sends an audio stream to some cooperation.

  41. Re:You heard it hear by GNious · · Score: 1

    Is why, when not at home, set a computer to play random video-clips from YouTube - Amazon will have fun figuring out what-is-what.

  42. Re:You heard it hear by gtall · · Score: 0

    "We always suspected that Big Brother was going to subcontract the work; now we know who got the bid!" Let me guess, you also believe WTC was an inside job.

  43. without camera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Poor man's kinect ?

  44. Re:Play it safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I apologize. While what I posted is better than that very long URL, I guess www.amazon.com/echo would have been better to mention.

    When I type in www.amazon.com, it brings me to http://www.amazon.com/oc/echo/ref_=ods_dp_ae
    I have no idea what "ods_dp_ae" is referring to.

  45. Not a wireless speaker by moxsam · · Score: 1

    more like a wireless microphone and the cloud is listening in.

  46. imagine a bar scene... by funkymonkjay · · Score: 1

    some drunken folks are arguing about the speed of light in vacume vs water.
    bartender gets weary of the pedantic noise and nods the folks over to Echo and say "Oh wise one... what is the speed of light in vacume vs water?"
    the crowd goes silent as it speaks. "answer is... 42!"

  47. Re:Play it safe by IsThisNickTaken · · Score: 1

    How will they make money, no one here reads the articles anyways.

  48. Customers who bought this .... by PPH · · Score: 1
    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  49. Open the Pod Bay Door . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, no thank you.

    Amazon now, officially ties Google for creeping me out.

  50. Where's the hole ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Critical design failure in that bot, where are we supposed to stick our cock ?

  51. Alexa... by easyTree · · Score: 2

    Alexa, what's the best way to be tax-efficient?

    Alexa, what were Mummy and Daddy whispering about on Christmas Eve?

  52. Re:You heard it hear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, what a dumbass; everyone knows that standard passenger airliners always fire under-body missiles before flying into buildings.

  53. Re:It *claims* to only be listening after the trig by txoutback · · Score: 1

    Leave it to the world's largest book seller to combine 1984 and Brave New World into one product. Personally, I'm holding out for the brain implant from Mozilla.

  54. sick of amazon's hard sell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You do know that even when not in operation, it listens to every sound in your home. Might as well have Bezos come in a plant bugging devices .

    Samsung already has voice activation on their galaxy. Why do we need another copy cat device from amazon. If your going to plug in amazon's new bugging device, why not plug in your iPhone and use "hey siri" At least apple isn't listening in on your household conversations 24/7

    Additionally, why by from amazon. Their prices are higher than most other vendors and most vendors offer free shipping so why pay amazon for that. I save thousands of dollars a year by searching bing, Google eBay etc for what I want to buy and avoiding high priced amazon. That smiley face on their box is bezos laughing all the way to the bank at all the consumers that over paid on his site.