Slashdot Mirror


Bicycle Bottle System Condenses Humidity From Air Into Drinkable Water

Diggester writes The weight of water limits how much can be brought on a long bike ride. There isn't always an option to stop and fill up from a clean stream or drinking fountain, but water could be obtained from a different source: the air. Austrian industrial design student Kristof Retezár has created Fontus: a prototype of a water bottle system that condenses humid air into clean, drinkable water. His design made him a finalist for the 2014 James Dyson Award.

24 of 167 comments (clear)

  1. Hmmm ... by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So, a small wind turbine (or taking turns on a bike), and any hot humid area where clean drinking water can be scarce is a good fit for this.

    I can see this applying to FAR more than cycling.

    Interesting.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Hmmm ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, of all the possible places this could be used it seems bizarre he decided to focus on the cyclist market.

    2. Re:Hmmm ... by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Funny

      LOL, to heck with the drinking water ... of far more importance to Slashdotters is this article which shows up on the side of that page ...

      The Automatic Sperm Sample Extractor.

      This piece of technology comes with a massage pipe that the user can adjust to suit his height. Upon setting the desired amplitude, frequency and temperature on the machine, the user is good to go. A small display on the top is featured for those who like some 'visual' assistance.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:Hmmm ... by ikedasquid · · Score: 4, Funny

      The vendor and support market could be huge too. Think of all the protocol droids that will need to be manufactured just to speak their binary language!

    4. Re:Hmmm ... by i+kan+reed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Point of fact: it's just an air conditioner. The only difference is that it uses mechanical power instead of electrical to run its heat pump.

    5. Re:Hmmm ... by neonKow · · Score: 4, Informative

      The article gives a rate of 1 drop per minute when it "starts to work". This means a standard 1/2 liter bottle would take over 2.5 hours to fill in 68 degree weather at 50% humidity, which doesn't seem that practical.

      In idea conditions, it still take an hour to fill that bottle. 0.5 L is not a lot in 100% humidity, and whatever hot temperature the maker considers ideal.

    6. Re:Hmmm ... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's because for most places you can make a more efficient, cheaper and more easily scalable version with a bucket, some plastic and a rock. The only drawback is that it's harder to mount on a bike.

    7. Re:Hmmm ... by hawguy · · Score: 2

      I'm a cyclist. So I can safely say, that serious cyclist spending $5k+ on a bike are doing so for weight. Those are the same people who spend $100 for a carbon bottle cage that weighs only a few grams less than a $5 plastic or metal cage.

      I'm a cyclist too, so I can safely say, that most cyclists spending $5K on a bike are doing so for appearance only, because if they lost just a few pounds of the extra weight they are carrying, it would save more money than the upgrade from a $2500 to a $5000 bike. I had a 250 lb friend who actually drilled out various components on his bike to save a few grams of weight. It wasn't until he snapped off his drilled out chainring that he realized that maybe the manufacturer already cut out as much weight as they could.

      They will most likely never purchase something like this for any serious use. Those that do, are those who have more money than sense, and buy expensive bikes so they can ride down the trail at 5mph on their expensive bikes in their expensive clothing blocking the paths looking like a cyclist.

      I'd never purchase something like this for serious use because if I'm going to be biking far from reliable water supplies, I don't want to count on a mechanical device to extract water for me. On long unsupported rides, I carry some water purification tablets just in case, but haven't had to use them yet, rural fire stations and post offices are a good source of water.

    8. Re:Hmmm ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah well I'm a 400km a week cyclist and I do Ironman. A 5K bike is NOT just about weight. Aero, stiffness, handling, quality of carbon, ride..... they all factor in and THAT means time savings or watt savings.

      Anyone that thinks 5K for a bike is just about weight is a cafe racer. Yeah sure, maybe a 2K sportive is about 10 minutes slower than a S-Works Tarmac over 90 kms but that is huge difference when your ass is on the saddle. The sportive is also wasting watts on frame twist, the S-Works puts every scrap to the wheel. Or how about alloy verses carbon aero wheels? I dont wear 45mm carbon wheels for weight, it's all about aero gains. Or how about a set of 3T aeromax handlebars? Dont have those for weight, those save 20watts at my typical speed. Oh and they remove road hum too.

      And the real reason why I ride expensive bikes? After 200 kms I'm feeling okay enough to turn around and do it again. Cheaper bikes leave you a rattled sore mess.

    9. Re:Hmmm ... by Luckyo · · Score: 2

      That used to be the case long long ago.

      Nowadays an average bike with amortized seat and front fork will ensure that even a fairly cheap frame and wheels won't tax you with vibration. The only problem is that you'll have to use about 5% more energy on the same route because portion of your spent energy will go into depressing the shock absorbers in the front fork.

      Now if you cycle at fairly extreme speeds where air drag becomes a serious issue, I can see going for a more expensive model, but in reality, all of you claims but one about using less energy at high speed due to lower drag have been long addressed for bikes on 1k budget.

      That said there is indeed one thing that this bike will not provide for people like you. Placebo effect.

  2. Re:The Numbers Lie by Russ1642 · · Score: 2

    Even at a drop per second it seems optimistic to expect 500mL an hour. I think a drop is less than 0.14mL.

  3. Doesn't distilled water taste horrible though? by Justpin · · Score: 2

    I remember 2 decades ago in high school they had distilled water squirty bottles to use in experiments. If you got it in your mouth it tasted rather bad. Since this is a kind of distillation shouldn't the water taste foul?

    1. Re:Doesn't distilled water taste horrible though? by 31415926535897 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Pure water does taste a little off, which is why bottled water companies add minerals to their product.

      If this is a big concern for athletes or anyone else using this system, they could easily transport a very small amount of mineral mix to dissolve in the water to fix the problem.

      Personally, I'd be shocked if this was the biggest problem. Athletes require far more fluids than this will be able to provide. I don't see this being practical.

  4. "Industrial design student" by caffeinated_bunsen · · Score: 5, Informative

    Apparently the industrial design curriculum doesn't cover thermodynamics. Condensing water at room temperature requires shedding about 680 watt-hours of energy per liter, and thermoelectric coolers tend to burn off more than twice the energy they pump (depends on a few variables, but practical devices in practical situations usually fall in that ballpark). You'd need somewhere near a constant half-kilowatt to provide for one person's normal water consumption. Much more if they're exercising or in a hot environment.

    --

    Bugrit! Millenium hand and shrimp!
  5. Re:Drinkable? Are you sure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here in Orlando, FL you can just hold up an empty glass and slice moisture out of the air with a butter knife. It'd work well here.

    I think there's actually a great market for something like this if it can be made to be light, compact and durable. Something small and light to take on backcountry camping trips to supplement drinking water.

    Bigger versions of it, if they could be made to be cheap and reliable enough, could be extremely useful for off-grid permanent installations. Case in point, Canaveral National Sea shore is a popular beach park here. The bathrooms on the beach are all dry bathrooms. There's no water to wash your hands with, let alone the possibility of drinking water. A stationary version of this with a small tank would be awesome. Same deal with bathrooms we've had to use in other state/national parks and when on safari in Africa.

    If a bigger stationary installation of this worked well enough, I'd consider having one here for my house for emergency use. It would only need to produce a modest amount of water.

  6. Re:adrift at sea by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 2

    IIRC, The Professor built one of these out of bamboo, and then made Gilligan pedal the bicycle.

  7. The numbers vary by Overzeetop · · Score: 3, Informative

    1 drop per minute is at 20C and 50% RH = 3ml/hr (0.05ml/drop). At that temp/RH, there is 0.01 kg moisture per kg of air. But in hot, humid weather (say 35C and 90% RH), there is 4x as much moisture in the air. More importantly, at 20/50% the dew point is 9C, or a delta T of 11C that the (horribly inefficient) peltier cooler must keep just to condense moisture. At 35C, and 90% RH, the dew point is 33C, requiring only a 2C delta T across the cooler, allowing more of the power to be used for the latent heat of condensation.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:The numbers vary by itzly · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, in hot humid air, the loss of sweat goes up dramatically, requiring more water. I think I'll just take an empty 2L bottle, filled with water on my bike rides in hot and humid air. Much cheaper and simpler.

  8. Re:I have a revolutionary idea.... by gstoddart · · Score: 2

    Not everywhere. Which is kind of the point.

    And there are places in the world which have high humidity but not ready access to clean drinking water. Pretty much any coastline along an ocean, for example.

    Anything which does small scale extraction like this is pretty cool, which is precisely why he's now a finalist for the Dyson Award.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  9. Re:RTFA by gstoddart · · Score: 2

    Even easier ... attach this and a solar panel to a weather vane, so it's always pointed into the wind.

    Put it somewhere which has both humidity and wind, but not necessarily clean drinking water.

    The differences between a bike-mounted application and a stationary one aren't insurmountable engineering. Just reusing existing stuff. In a lot of places, solar power and prevailing winds will go a long way.

    What awesome thing have you designed which could make the world a better place? What's that? Nothing?

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  10. Re:How much does the device weigh? by geantvert · · Score: 4, Funny

    Normal water is too heavy when travelling by bike so I always bring dehydrated water instead.

  11. Instant Stuff by pipingguy · · Score: 2

    Just invent powdered water, that way...oh, wait.

  12. Re:The Numbers Lie by Russ1642 · · Score: 2

    Yeah. The AC had it as .001mL per drop, which is very low. 0.05 mL per second gives you 180 mL an hour, which is pretty much useless to a person riding a bicycle.

  13. Re:Unintended consequences by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2

    Good point. And if you have all those cyclists breathing hard, they'll produce more CO2 which is a greenhouse gas.