Slashdot Mirror


Congress Suggests Moat, Electronic Fence To Protect White House

PolygamousRanchKid writes Acting Secret Service director Joseph Clancy on Wednesday faced a number of tough questions from the House Judiciary Committee about the fence jumper who made it deep into the White House. But along with the tough questions, Clancy fielded a couple eyebrow raising suggestions on how to better protect the president's home. "Would a moat, water six feet around, be kind of attractive and effective?" Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn., asked with trepidation. Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas, asked: “Would you be in favor of removing the fence around the White House and having, maybe, a virtual or electronic fence around it?” Clancy liked the moat idea better than the electric fence. “My knee-jerk reaction to that would be no, sir,” he told Gohmert. “Partly because of the number of tourists that come up Pennsylvania Avenue and come up to that area.”

35 of 213 comments (clear)

  1. Moat? Electric fence? by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why not just ring the White House with a fucking minefield?

    1. Re:Moat? Electric fence? by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 5, Funny

      So long as it is effective in keeping the President from escaping, I'm all for it.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    2. Re:Moat? Electric fence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They're just pointing out the hypocrisy of politicians being protected by guns and fences, while telling citizens they can't have guns and that a fence isn't needed on our nations borders (despite cartels and bad guys with known terrorist ties crossing daily).

    3. Re:Moat? Electric fence? by Etherwalk · · Score: 2

      They're just pointing out the hypocrisy of politicians being protected by guns and fences, while telling citizens they can't have guns and that a fence isn't needed on our nations borders (despite cartels and bad guys with known terrorist ties crossing daily).

      Downtown Washington is littered with dozens of federal buildings, each having its own set of trained security and metal detectors and the like. We spend a fortune on it.

    4. Re:Moat? Electric fence? by CaptainLard · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I get your point that congress should shut the fuck up and let the expert handle it. That session must have been like every engineering meeting I've been in where management suggests ways to "fix" a technical issue. Only this took place on the grandest scale.

      Oh, and it also reminds me of posts to technical /. stories that go "OBVIOUSLY this new thing won't work because they OBVIOUSLY didn't think of this OBVIOUS problem that I realized because I'm a genius and skimmed the summary". There's gotta be some syndrome that covers it....

    5. Re:Moat? Electric fence? by steelfood · · Score: 2

      Or instead of water, use lava.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    6. Re:Moat? Electric fence? by plover · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Hey, Joe, now that we've finished surrounding the Capitol building lawns with mines, we've still got a bunch of extra mines. What should we do with them?"

      "They're not extra. They said ring the building, so the plans are to mine the walks and driveways, too. Maybe if they wrote the policy better, they'd have thought to add an access route."

      --
      John
    7. Re:Moat? Electric fence? by Bodhammer · · Score: 4, Funny

      "We have pass the map to find out what is in it" - is that what you mean?

      --
      "I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."
    8. Re:Moat? Electric fence? by DeputySpade · · Score: 2

      Or instead of water, use lava.

      Sharks with frickin' laser beams!

      --


      This space intentionally left blank
    9. Re:Moat? Electric fence? by guruevi · · Score: 2

      The International Campaign to Ban Landmines has sought to ban land mines culminating in the 1997 Ottawa Treaty, although this treaty has not yet been accepted by a number of countries including the USA. Matter of fact, the US is one of the largest producers of land mines.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    10. Re:Moat? Electric fence? by Goonie · · Score: 2
      That has to be the stupidest accusation of hypocrisy I've heard in a long time. Apples and fucking oranges.

      The White House is a (relatively) small building which faces a real, live, no-shit security threat for which armed guards and big fences are a rational, effective, and cost-effective response.

      Big fences along the entirety of the United States land border and random citizens arming themselves to the teeth, by contrast, are dumb responses to the threats which the country, as a whole, faces - not least, shooting each other with guns at a rate that far exceeds any other developed country.

      --

      Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
      --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
    11. Re:Moat? Electric fence? by Kielistic · · Score: 2

      Well mines are pretty frowned upon. Mexicans and Canadians are both capable of swimming so moats wouldn't actually keep anyone out.

      So against treaties and completely ineffectual.. You're right- that does sound like it is within the mandates of the US government.

    12. Re: Moat? Electric fence? by jd · · Score: 2

      That's the problem. One or two civilized actions and people will start expecting it. Before long, the country will be peaceful and almost murder free. It is absolutely essential, to maintain current levels of paranoia, schizophrenia and xenophobia, to eliminate all vestiges of ethics and morality.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    13. Re:Moat? Electric fence? by Cederic · · Score: 2

      Hmm. You could call it an Iron Curtain too, that's a nifty name. Set up some checkpoints for legitimate visitors, maybe just letters for names - the phonetic alphabet might work here.

      Who knows, maybe it'll prove as impervious as its namesake. i.e. Not very.

  2. One man's moat.... by RevWaldo · · Score: 2

    ...is a fearless tourist's lazy river ride.

    .

  3. Sharks by kwiecmmm · · Score: 5, Funny

    This moat needs sharks with lasers attached to their heads!!

  4. Re:Shoot one by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So you think summary execution is the appropriate punishment for simple trespass?

  5. Jefferson by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Jefferson used to complain about the long line of people at the White House who were there to see him - most of them looking for a job hand-out, but some with legitimate issues for him to deal with.

    Perhaps Congress could start by dissolving the enivronment that has caused so many people to want to do antisocial things like harming a President, who is mostly supposed to be a CEO of the government, and occasionally lead a defensive war against the country.

    Oh, nm, that's just crazy-talk. Might as well fill the moat with hunter-killer boats from Lockheed.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  6. Re:Shoot one by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

    So you think summary execution is the appropriate punishment for simple trespass?

    If you can't do the time don't do the crime.

    (ps to the humour impaired, this is a joke, not a troll)

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  7. Virtual Fence? by aevan · · Score: 4, Funny

    I suppose it makes sense, with laws painting us all as virtually terrorists.

    That said, I like Punji stake pits as an idea. Or high-tension trampolines that snap-release and launch plumetters back into the air. Hook it to a live web-stream.

  8. So many? by jklovanc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps Congress could start by dissolving the enivronment that has caused so many people to want to do antisocial things

    Between 2000 and now there have been 14 "intruders" at the White House. Only one of which actually broke into the building. These intruders include a toddler who squeezed through the fence and a couple who crashed a Sate dinner. That is an average of less than one per year who had antisocial intent. From a population of 360 million less than one per year is not many.

    1. Re:So many? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Perhaps Congress could start by dissolving the enivronment that has caused so many people to want to do antisocial things

      Between 2000 and now there have been 14 "intruders" at the White House. Only one of which actually broke into the building. These intruders include a toddler who squeezed through the fence and a couple who crashed a Sate dinner. That is an average of less than one per year who had antisocial intent. From a population of 360 million less than one per year is not many.

      But you don't understand, in the post 9-11 world we don't assess the real risks. Only the imaginary ones.
      And end up paying billions/trillions of dollars for nothing.

  9. Re:Shoot one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Shoot one or two of the fence jumpers. The frequency of fence jumping will drop to almost nothing. Then, when some knucklehead does jump the fence you'll know it's a genuine threat and you may open fire on that one as well.

    Bullets are cheaper than moats and cyber fence thingies.

    If Obama were consistent, he'd let the people who illegally jump the White House fence live in the White House.

  10. It's just vanity by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The politicians think they are irreplaceable. They should read a little history. I can't wait for the Praetorian guard to become powerful enough to start removing and placing politicians as they see fit. Did you know that the Roman Empire was auctioned to the highest bidder at one point?

    Seriously if the politicians are so afraid of "the masses" then maybe they should start actually representing those masses like they're supposed to.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  11. Expertise in Congress? by l2718 · · Score: 2

    So when did these august Congresscritters aquire expertise in installation security? I have no opinion on whether a moats would be a good or bad idea, but surely the Congressmen have no idea either.

  12. Re:Eletronic? by Paul+Carver · · Score: 2

    They got it right. Eletronic refers to the new state of the art robotic elephants. They look a bit like Chisulo in body armor, but with more electricity and less biology.

  13. Damned if you do damned if you don't by jklovanc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Personal security everywhere has a few conflicting objectives.
    - Protect the person from physical threats
    - Do not appear intimidating to the general public
    - React quickly to perceived threats
    - Do not overreact to perceived threats
    Sure you could put a concrete wall around the White House and shoot anyone who climbed over but that would be very bad.

    This incident has been blown way out of proportion. Lets look at what really happened.
    1. I guy jumps a fence.
    2. He runs across the lawn. He was seen at this point and an alarm was triggered (the problem is that the alarm was muted for some reason)
    3. He enters an unlocked door (Which would have been locked had the alarm sounded).
    4. He runs past a startled security guard (The one who would have locked the door if the alarm had sounded).
    5. He runs up the stairs and across a long room.
    6. He is tackled by a counterassault agent.
    The only people he encountered were security personnel and he did not damage anything and harmed no one.

    Lets look at what contributed to the incident.
    1. He was not shot as he had no visible weapons.
    2. The door to remain unlocked because the alarm was muted. The article claims that is was muted on the orders of the Usher's office
    3. The President was in the process of leaving the building. During movement security is concentrated around the president as that is when he is most vulnerable. That left the front lawn less protected as there was less there to protect.

    How to fix the issue?
    1. Never mute the alarms
    2. Connect the front door lock to the alarm so it locks when the alarm goes off.
    Those are simple solutions to a small problem.

    Mr Gonzalez is a Iraq War veteran with mental health issue. Though he had a knife on him he never brandished it and no one knew of it's existence until he was arrested. What do you think the comments would have been if it turned out that an unarmed Iraq War veteran with PTSD was shot dead while trying to enter the White House? So the Secret Service has to choose between being damned for letting someone into an an empty area of the White House or damned for shooting an unarmed Iraq War veteran with PTSD. You choose.

    1. Re:Damned if you do damned if you don't by fatwilbur · · Score: 2

      Yup, what I read from it was "handled correctly & existing systems are effective".

      It's always good practice to do an incident review when something bad happens, to find gaps in existing processes and taking some time to reflect if there's any meaningful improvement that can be done.

      What I don't like is that the answer is never to leave things as is. Out of an incident review, on anything from IT to White House security, there is always enormous pressure to do *something* tangible, whether that something actually helps or not.

  14. Don't hide the security, decorate it by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    Do what the Brits do: create some fun and fanciful traditional-like uniform for the guards, and post 2 guards near the front gate, 2 near the front door, and one on each corner of the building.

    Maybe something like this:

    http://www.halloweencostumes.c...

    (Without the boyish face, though.)

  15. Mistakes by jklovanc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I love this quote from this article;

    “I worry about her whole approach,” said Representative Jason Chaffetz, Republican of Utah, who is the chairman of a subcommittee that on Monday scheduled a hearing on the incident for next week. “I do question the director’s leadership. This is a place where we can never, ever make a mistake.”

    This just shows how little Representative Jason Chaffetz actually knows about personal security. Security Agents are human and will make mistakes. Security systems are designed to take that into consideration by designing security in layers. One or more layers may be breached due to mistakes but unless the person being secured is harmed then the system worked. Lets look at what happened.
    1. He climbed the fence. While a security layer it is designed to deter entry not prevent entry. Layer worked as designed.
    2. He ran across the lawn and was seen by a security agent who sounded the alarm. Security layer worked as designed.
    3. He opened the door. Layer failed due to alarm being muted.
    4. He ran past startled security guard. Layer failed due to alarm being muted.
    5. He ran up some stairs and was tackled by counter assault agent. Security layer successful.

    There were probably a few more security layers between that point and the President. The only mistakes I see are the alarm being muted and the door not being automatically locked by the alarm. Would you rather have snipers shooting anyone who climbs over the fence?

  16. Re:Shoot one by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 2

    When a guy in an M1A1 "executes" a guy in a T-74, that's not's really "punishment" either.

    So in your mind, the relationship between the Secret Service and the general public should be modeled on how the US military responds to an invading army?

  17. Re:Shoot one by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So in your mind, the relationship between the Secret Service and the general public should be modeled on how the US military responds to an invading army?

    Sounds good to me. Why continue with the illusion that American government is "of the people, by the people, for the people." It's not. Why continue the illusion it is?

  18. Re:What A Shame by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

    The closest English-speaking nation to the USA is the UK,

    Kanuckistanis don't speak English any more?

    Or has Canada been merged with the US while I wasn't looking?

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  19. redundancy by Tom · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In tech, we solve single-point-of-failure issues with redundancy.

    You guys should have not one, but several reserve presidents, and a few reserve headquarters, and if one of them gets blown up, just don't make it a big deal.

    That sounds like sarcasm, but really, it's not. Just framed a bit tongue-in-cheek. But how often do you hear members of the senate being targets of assassination attempts? The senate is as important as the president, but thanks to using a highly distributed system with extreme redundancy, they are far less interesting targets.

    But I guess we as human beings still have minds from 50,000 years ago and we want to see a leader to our tribe. The concept of shared leadership is brilliant, but too advanced for our stone-age brains.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org