Slashdot Mirror


James Watson's Nobel Prize Goes On Auction This Week

HughPickens.com writes: Nicholas St. Fleur reports at The Atlantic that James Watson, the famed molecular biologist and co-discoverer of DNA, is putting his Nobel Prize up for auction on Thursday. He's the first Nobel laureate in history to do so. In 2007, Watson, best known for his work deciphering the DNA double helix alongside Francis Crick in 1953, made an incendiary remark regarding the intelligence of black people that lost him the admiration of the scientific community. It made him, in his own words, an "unperson." That year, The Sunday Times quoted Watson as saying that he felt "inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa" because "all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours—whereas all the testing says not really." Watson has a history of making racist and sexist declarations, according to Time. At a science conference in 2012, Watson said of women in science, "I think having all these women around makes it more fun for the men but they're probably less effective." To many scientists his gravest offense was not crediting Rosalind Franklin with helping him deduce the structure of DNA.

Watson is selling his prized medallion because he has no income outside of academia, even though for years he had served on many corporate boards. The gold medal is expected to bring in between $2.5 million and $3.5 million when it goes to auction. Watson says that he will use the money to purchase art and make donations to institutions that have supported him, such as the University of Chicago. He adds that the auction will also offer him the chance to "re-enter public life." "I've had a unique life that's allowed me to do things. I was set back. It was stupid on my part," says Watson. "All you can do is nothing, except hope that people actually know what you are."

14 of 355 comments (clear)

  1. Crushed Freedoms by JimSadler · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    This man is a victem of the politically moderated speech problem. He stated his beliefs and was then considered anti-female and anti black. In reference to black, native people I do not find it outlandish to suppose that there is little demand for esoteric reasoning as they are busy enough trying to eek out a living. I further do not think it is offensive to state that peoples' minds and social customs adapt to what is needful to survive. Therefore I would expect it to be very rare for native people, not exposed heavily to western life, may not have activated abilities in the mind that are more common in urban cultures. That is not looking down on anyone. People simply adapt their minds to their needs. As far as the remarks about female scientists in the workplace he is on target. The men probably enjoyed the company and therefore the men may not be as concentrated on their work. It does not attack the ability of women at all. It points to the difficulty in mixing sexes in some jobs. The notion of non-offensive speech is killing free speech.

  2. Re:we ARE different by i+kan+reed · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    And just to reinforce that this douche is working on imagined extrapolations, if it's so damn heritable, how the fuck do racial IQ disparities shrink almost a whole standard deviation in one generation?

    Why did anyone mod ShanghailBill up?

    Is this some autistic need to categorize?

    What is fucking wrong with slashdotters?

  3. Re:Of Course It Was by i+kan+reed · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    No, sorry, I don't speak racist-piece-of-shit.

    You gotta be a decent human being before your barbs sting.

  4. Re:we ARE different by i+kan+reed · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Oh no. Swearing.

    You're right, he might be an ignorant bigot perpetuating some of the dumbest shit imaginable, but he didn't fucking swear.

  5. Re:we ARE different by i+kan+reed · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Oh, I'm sorry. Is my tone offending you?

    I have a lot of growing up to do, huh?

    Fuck off.

  6. Re: Of Course It Was by i+kan+reed · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Oh, heaven help me, a racist piece of shit insulted me.

    However will I recover from the stinging opinions of awful people?

    Seriously, racists are almost not people. Why should I care what ignorant fuckers think of me?

  7. Re:Of Course It Was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Hey, everyone, look! A college dropout is calling a Nobel Prize winner an "idiot" because the college dropout is good at ignoring evidence that doesn't agree with his worldviews!

    Shut the fuck up, i kan reed. You're probably the dumbest motherfucker on Slashdot. You're worse for Slashdot than Dice or Beta ever were.

  8. Maginificent wild-caught Illiberal by mi · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Fuck you.

    Fuck everyone who upmodded you.

    Fuck everyone who just became less informed because you spouted of your uneducated racist-ass beliefs.

    And this, is how Illiberals react, when a thoughtcriminal challenges their — unsubstantiated — beliefs... This perfect example of Illiberal approach to arguing makes a good conversational piece and is now available printed on archive-quality paper.

    Wild-caught. Order it with an attractive (organic) wood frame for only $9.99 more and receive free shipping within continental US. Call now, operators are standing by.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Maginificent wild-caught Illiberal by i+kan+reed · · Score: -1, Flamebait

      No, this is how I react when racists post unfactual bullshit, refuted by their own supporting citations, to defend beliefs that hurt people in the real world.

      Honestly. You are terrible. Stop being terrible, and we can sort out any differences you want.

      "Nah, see, racism is okay, cause it's just his opinion maaaaaaaaaaan" isn't a valid defense of untrue shit.

      It's not like I'm throwing him in jail. You're just insisting on "politically correct" tolerance of racism. Fuck you. Stop with your thoughtcrime accusations.

    2. Re:Maginificent wild-caught Illiberal by i+kan+reed · · Score: -1, Flamebait

      Oh, I see, you assume because I give a shit about things I couldn't possibly be white or male.

      I love when bigots apply their bigotry and turn out wrong.

      Except they keep doing it, instead of learning their damn lesson, about making mindless judgements.

  9. Re:we ARE different by i+kan+reed · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    And again, you ignorant piece of trash, who ignores refutations and repeats your racist beliefs:

    If the difference is so damn heritable, how did the discrepancy shrink by 7 to 14 points in one generation?

    Give one goddamn reason.

  10. Re:we ARE different by i+kan+reed · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Yeah, but there's this threshold where you're wrong enough, and shitty enough, that public hatred for your opinions isn't some chilling effect that's going to supress free speech. He has a right to be wrong, but he has no goddamn right not be hated for it when it's this level of awful.

  11. Re: Is it true... by i+kan+reed · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Oh, unsubstantiated accusations of racism.

    I love this.

    "Black people are by their nature stupider than whites"

    "That's not true and your own damn link undermines you, racist"

    "Ha, you called that totally innocent rational person a racist! You must just shout that at everyone."

  12. Re:Is it true... by i+kan+reed · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    You know what, fuck it. Here's another post for you racists to mod down.

    Not one goddamn person has supported his notion that Africa hasn't had progress.

    Multiple people have modded me down for calling him out on his racist bullshit.

    One of you ignorant fuckers defend this shit.

    I mean, just look at the HDI growths, and keep telling me nothing changed.

    There's just nothing to this bullshit. And you guys just eat it the fuck up.

    What's wrong with you?

    What's wrong with you?