Slashdot Mirror


The Fastest Camera Ever Made Captures 100 Billion Frames Per Second

Jason Koebler writes A new imaging technique is able to capture images at 100 billion frames per second—fast enough to watch light interact with objects, which could eventually lead to new cloaking technologies. The camera was developed by a team at Washington University in St. Louis—for the team's first tests, it was able to visualize laser pulse reflections, photons racing through air and through resin, and "faster-than-light propagation of non-information." It can also be used in conjunction with telescopes and to image optical and quantum communications, according to lead researcher Liang Gao.

11 of 122 comments (clear)

  1. Don't tell Peter Jackson by Layzej · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't tell Peter Jackson

  2. No. by Smonson78 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No... no it isn't. And no you can't. And no they won't.

  3. faster-than-light propagation of non-information by zlives · · Score: 4, Insightful

    yup thats exactly how i feel

  4. Fastest, ehh? by Bengie · · Score: 3, Informative

    World's Fastest Camera Captures 4.4 Trillion Frames Per Second August 14, 2014
    http://tech.slashdot.org/story...

    1. Re:Fastest, ehh? by Bengie · · Score: 3, Informative

      MIT camera renders light at a trillion frames per second Uploaded on Dec 21, 2011
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      I highly recommend watching if you haven't already.

    2. Re:Fastest, ehh? by Ost99 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The MIT camera doesn't capture that many frames pr second. The video they create show a trillion frames per second, but it's created from a gazillion movies of identical light pulses.

      --
      ---- Sig. gone.
  5. "Non-Information"? by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Funny

    "faster-than-light propagation of non-information" -- Politicians will looove that technology

  6. Re:faster-than-light propagation of non-informatio by AK+Marc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Event horizons.

    Picture scissors. The edges come together as they close. So increase the size of the scissors, and the speed you close them. Eventually the "point" where the scissors come together will eventually go faster than the speed of light.

    It's "real". It's visible. And it isn't mass, energy, or information.

    If you don't like that, take a laser. Point it at a cloud. Move the light as fast as you can. The point of light (as seen as the reflection on the cloud) can travel faster than the speed of light.

  7. Re:faster-than-light propagation of non-informatio by AK+Marc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    No, not love. I thought techies on a tech site would have learned something in physics class. What are they teaching these days, and is there an opening for roman_mir?

  8. Re:faster-than-light propagation of non-informatio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Imagine a powerful, hand-held laser that you can point at the moon and see the reflection. Point it at the far end of the surface of the moon. Now flick your wrist, sweeping the laser across the surface of the moon within 1/100th of a second. The reflected dot will _appear_ to move faster than the speed of light. That is, it will appear to move smoothly* across 3476km (the diameter of moon) of the surface in 1/100th of a second. The speed of light is 299792km/second, and the dot moved at 347600km/second. In other words, it appeared to have moved faster than the speed of light.

    Actually, there's really no need to italicize the word appear, I guess. There is a dot and it is moving (even if you define it as a series of discrete reflections, they're all causally related). It's just not the kind of "thing" that can convey information. You can't encode any information in the movement that conveys information to an observer faster than the speed of light.

    * You may need to use time-lapse video. I just used the moon as an example because it's concrete. If the moon were larger and farther, the sweeping motion of your wrist could be slower.

  9. Faster than light?! by skaag · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If it can watch photons move, what exactly transfers the existence of those photons to the camera's sensor? some of the photons that refract from dust and air?

    --

    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain... time... to... die...