Slashdot Mirror


Chinese CEO Says "Free" Is the Right Price For Mobile Software

hackingbear writes Sheng Fu, CEO of Cheetah Mobile, a public Chinese mobile software company you probably haven't heard of, but whose products are among the top downloaded products in Android markets around the world, said that the intense competition of the Chinese market leads to products that can compete globally. Many recent university graduates are working in tech, all with their startups looking to find their place in the market, he said. Chinese companies saw the impact that piracy played in the PC software era, and China's mobile companies grew up knowing they would need to make money without getting consumers to open their wallets. "Chinese companies are so good at making free but high-quality products," he said. Sounds like we have a good race to the bottom.

15 of 133 comments (clear)

  1. Nutshell by binarylarry · · Score: 3, Funny

    You must defeat Sheng Fu to stand a chance!

    --
    Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
  2. Profit? by link-error · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That only seems to work when the government is paying you to install spyware.

    --
    -Unresolved symbol? Byte me!
    1. Re:Profit? by Rosyna · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How are they earning a profit? If the apps are free, where do they get the money? If it's from ads, then that doesn't count as free.

    2. Re:Profit? by thaylin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      how does transactions for extras make the base app not free?

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    3. Re:Profit? by SourceFrog · · Score: 4, Informative

      Google pays Android OEMs a percentage of the huge 30% cut it takes from their app store for apps. So by generating intense competition amongst app developers, what Google and the mobile companies (and their OEM partners) are effectively doing is forcing app developers to subsidize the operating system and mobile phone development - most app developers have been driven to such low margins that many are losing money (Google and the OEMs etc. get the lion's share of profits that used to go to software developers, by establishing app stores as effectively a software distribution (middleman) cartel based business model). Sheng Fu seems proud of the fact they've done this - actually it's nothing to be proud of, as it's doing a lot of harm to software developers.

      --
      My other UID is three digits.
    4. Re:Profit? by donscarletti · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm the CTO in a Chinese technology company. The government has never paid us to install spyware or anything else for that matter. In fact, the government just cares about 1) blood not being too red, 2) gambling not being too overt 3) users not being able to use words equivalent to "fuck" or "cunt" in English, names of prominent politicians or particular terms in reference to disagreements with neighboring countries, 4) characters being in simplified and not traditional script. 5) under 18 not playing video games for more than 4 hours per day.

      Beyond that, they don't give a shit.

      Westerners often revere the Chinese government as being some all knowing all powerful being with a profound understanding of technology and deeply nuanced plans that span decades, roughly in the same way they view their own government. Fact is, the Chinese government is interested in keeping its people more-or-less satisfied with the status quo, just like your own government is. Chinese old people with too much free time to cause trouble get their panties in a knot about sex drugs and violence and "young people these days", so that's what the Chinese authorities crack down on. They simply do not have the time or inclination to be bothered with who you are and what you are doing.

      Think about the last time you interacted with your own government. Did they know who you are? Did they know what your life circumstances were? I'll wager they didn't know shit about who you are and why you were there, nor did they care, they just wanted you to either shut up and go away or pay your tax and go away. Now imagine that level of caring, divide that by 1000, that's how much foreign governments gives a shit about you. Your own government couldn't even be bothered installing spyware on your computer, why would the Chinese government?

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    5. Re:Profit? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm the CTO in a Chinese technology company. The government has never paid us to install spyware or anything else for that matter. ... Your own government couldn't even be bothered installing spyware on your computer, why would the Chinese government?

      While you make some good points, I've repeatedly had to clean the same state-sponsored spyware off of laptops coming out of China. Now this is probably just done to computers that go through customs "screening" as they could be transporting "something" in and out of the country, but I've also had to deal with situations where foreign companies operating inside China have been required to install state-sponsored spyware on their computer systems.

      You're right -- they don't care about individuals, just like the US doesn't. But in both cases, they highly desire the monitoring capability, so that automated systems can flag up potential issues. Neither China nor the US is the first country to do this -- the first state sponsored spyware I've seen originated in Germany, and was installed only on targeted computers. That was a long time ago, and since then, the barrier to install has dropped siginificantly, and the number of participants has grown to include most governments around the world.

  3. When you're right, you're right. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've been saying that the gold rush for mobile development is ended, but that's been met with derision and unbelief. Cost is always an important factor.

    Beta tapes cost more than VHS: VHS, though inferior, won.
    Early Apple computers cost more than early PCs. PCs won.

    There are plenty more examples where people will settle for cheap over expensive. Apps are just another one - once people are in the habit of not paying for an app, you'd better be in the top 0.1% of apps to justify getting paid.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    1. Re:When you're right, you're right. by thaylin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It won because of p0rn

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    2. Re:When you're right, you're right. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You missed my point - the gold rush was anyone with a mobile development kit and a few weeks/months could make a profit. Now, most mobile developers either make nothing or - for those who actually make money - an average of $34 a month. They'd be better off devoting that time to collecting refundable bottles.

      Look at this ask slashdot

      I'm a recent grad from a master's program in a potentially worthless social science field, and I've considered getting into iOS development. Several of my friends who were in similar situations after grad school have done so and are making a healthy living getting contract work. Although they had CS and Physics degrees going into iOS, neither had worked in objective C and both essentially went through a crash courses (either self-taught or through intensive classes) in order to get their first gigs. I have two questions. First, am I an idiot for thinking I can teach myself either objective C or Swift on my own without any academic CS background (I've tinkered in HTML, CSS, and C classes online with some success)? Second, if I'm not an idiot for attempting to learn either language, which should I concentrate on?

      People still see mobile as a "fall-back" option that will probably provide them with enough income to pay the bills, when stats say this is already false, and will only get worse.

      We're looking at a future where you need to be able to produce quality product for free and hang in long enough to actually get some users to pay for the add-ins, bonus levels, and unlocked features. Large developers backed by lots of capital and marketing budgets will continue to eat into the mobile app space. With a couple of million apps out there, new players need to have the money to be seen in the first place.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  4. Can somebody direct me to some examples? by bogaboga · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Chinese companies are so good at making free but high-quality products," ...

    If these companies are so good, where are some of their "high-quality" products?

    1. Re:Can somebody direct me to some examples? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In my town, the "high-quality" Chinese products are at the dollar store...

  5. Re:Do You Even Revenue, Bro? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You know all those links you clicked? All those pages you saw? There was ads on them. That's the business model.

  6. Re:"free" but.... by thaylin · · Score: 3, Informative

    The app is still free, it does not mean you cannot do other things with the app that may come at a cost.

    --
    When you cant win, ad hominem.
  7. Free Chinese stuff? by JeffOwl · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't know about spyware, but with apps at least you don't have to worry about lead or melamine.