Slashdot Mirror


Sony Employees Receive Email Threat From Hackers: 'Your Family Will Be In Danger

MojoKid writes: Things are going from bad to worse when it comes to the recent Sony Pictures Entertainment breach. Not only has sensitive financial information been released — including the salaries of high-ranking Sony executives — but more damaging personal information including 47,000 Social Security numbers of employees and actors have been leaked to the internet. We're now learning some even more disturbing details, unfortunately. Guardians of Peace (GOP), the hackers claiming responsibility for infiltrating Sony's computer network, are now threatening to harm the families of Sony employees. GOP reportedly sent Sony employees an email, which just so happened to be riddled with spelling and grammatical errors, that read in part, "your family will be in danger."

3 of 184 comments (clear)

  1. Itr should not be an issue by houghi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The issue is that the SSN is used for identification. In Belgium we also have a national number. Pretty easy. in Dutch yet this only links to you and does not identify you as such.

    Everybody above 12 needs to have an ID. Checking vadility is free and the chip on it is opensource

    Oh and if you are a financial company, you can do verification at the national bank where you can check if you are allowed to give people a credit or not and add that you gave people a credit.

    With just the number, you can do nothing. You would at least have the (valid) ID card as well.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  2. Re:Agenda? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Anyone can send an email. I'm not sure how they know for certain gop sent the email and not some random 13 year old with bad english skills.

    It would certainly be a great way to discredit gop too. Just have someone send an over the line email claiming to be gop. The fbi, a private contractor, etc.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  3. Re:That Word by dAzED1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    the English speaker isn't misunderstanding, they're being intentionally misled. That is a very big difference. They are perfectly understanding the intended message.