Slashdot Mirror


$35 Quad-core Hacker SBC Offers Raspberry Pi-like Size and I/O

DeviceGuru writes: Hardkernel has again set its sights on the Raspberry Pi with a new $35 Odroid-C1 hacker board that matches the RPI's board size and offers a mostly similar 40-pin expansion connector. Unlike the previous $30 Odroid-W that used the same Broadcom BCM2835 SoC as the Pi and was soon cancelled due to lack of BCM2835 SoC availability, the Odroid-C1 is based on a quad-core 1.5GHz Cortex-A5 based Amlogic S805 SoC, which integrates the Mali-400 GPU found on Allwinner's popular SoCs. Touted advantages over the similarly priced Raspberry Pi Model B+ include a substantially more powerful processor, double the RAM, an extra USB2.0 port that adds Device/OTG, and GbE rather than 10/100 Ethernet.

140 comments

  1. set its sites by amalcolm · · Score: 5, Informative

    Arggh ... set its sights FFS

    --
    Time for bed, said Zebedee - boing
    1. Re:set its sites by Halifax+Samuels · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe they finalized their webpages about it.

  2. Can it run Flash? by CastrTroy · · Score: 2

    Can this device run Flash in the browser? If it can, I'd be very likely to get one for each of my kids for doing their homework and general computing on. I'm not a big fan of flash, but it's necessary for some of the homework/game sites the school uses. Combine it with a monitor, keyboard and mouse, and something like this seems to be good enough to be a fully functional computer.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:Can it run Flash? by bobbied · · Score: 0

      An old laptop running XP would work..... Might be cheaper too.. I find them in the trash all the time.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    2. Re:Can it run Flash? by thaylin · · Score: 1

      And you would connect one of them to a network?

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    3. Re:Can it run Flash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as it's behind a decent firewall you shouldn't have any problems.

    4. Re:Can it run Flash? by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Yes, but not my network. Probably one of the neighbors' unsecured WiFi.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    5. Re:Can it run Flash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you would connect one of them to a network?

      I'm sure you would the way it is, but remember that most laptops have their Windows license stamped on the bottom so you can reinstall Windows. I woldn't have a hard time doing that.

    6. Re:Can it run Flash? by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      Hey, get off my unsecured wifi already! And my lawn!

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    7. Re:Can it run Flash? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Might be cheaper in the short run, but in the long run, you have to keep on replacing them. Get a decent monitor, keyboard and mouse, and they will last for many years. Then you can replace the computer as it stops working, or as newer computers come along at really low prices.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    8. Re:Can it run Flash? by tom17 · · Score: 2

      It's the only place I can get decent reception. Relocate your router and I'll gladly get off your lawn.

      In the meantime, can you please give it a quick mow? It's getting long and tickly.

    9. Re:Can it run Flash? by bobbied · · Score: 1

      And you would connect one of them to a network?

      Sure... Just be ready to re-image the thing... In fact that's what I do for my homeschooled kid (well what I used to do until the laptop died about a month ago). Whenever something strange starts happening, I pop in the media and restore the image. Problem solved...

      I've actually considered just running Linux, putting the XP part in a VM and keeping a snapshot that gets restored every time the machine boots. It's just too much trouble to set up right now and my kid doesn't have that many years of school left to make it worth the time.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    10. Re:Can it run Flash? by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Might be cheaper in the short run, but in the long run, you have to keep on replacing them. Get a decent monitor, keyboard and mouse, and they will last for many years. Then you can replace the computer as it stops working, or as newer computers come along at really low prices.

      We do laptops for my kid because we homeschool and having a portable platform for him to do "homework" while away from home is a definite advantage for us. But, I usually get free laptops that my friends are throwing away when I promise to securely wipe their drives and destroy any personal data. My cost is just my time, or on the rare occasion they want to keep the drive, another drive.

      It's been pretty cheep so far... But, that's not to say my time is worthless either. I can see why people who don't have the IT skills I have keep buying new stuff, and I don't mind taking their cast offs...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    11. Re:Can it run Flash? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Why not? My kids don't have tax returns or anything like that on there and it's behind a NAT.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    12. Re:Can it run Flash? by Spliffster · · Score: 2

      I don't know about this one, but I own an Odroid U3 (Cortex A9, quad 1.7ghz) and it does very well. It costs abit more (I think it was around usd 50 or 60).

      Their Linux distro is not the best, based on ubuntu and their documentation is really crap. Fine hardware tho.

      Cheers
      -S

    13. Re:Can it run Flash? by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      Reboot Restore Rx is a free solution. It puts Windows back to the "frozen" state at each boot. I move the user directories over to another partition so that those are persistent. When you want to add a new program or make some other change, you simply log in as an Admin and disable the tool from the notification icon, make your changes, and then re-enable the tool after a reboot. It works with any version of Windows back to 2000.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    14. Re:Can it run Flash? by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As long as it's behind a decent firewall you shouldn't have any problems.

      Yes, up to now, Windows has mainly been attacked by Hackers(TM) connecting to its daemons' ports, because Windows sysadmins forget to turn off all its services. It's an old story: mom forgot to uncheck "share passwords" or "be an open mail relay" and it's true that a firewall will help with those kinds of problems.

      But what if Windows ever grows out of its mainly-for-servers role and gets popular on the desktop? Can you imagine what sort of problems might appear if people start using that OS to run web browsers or read email? A lot of good firewalls will do then. Sure, 2014 may be Yet Another Year of Linux on the desktop, but what about 2015?

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    15. Re:Can it run Flash? by marcello_dl · · Score: 2

      You might want to try another distro, this one has images for odroids
      http://www.voidlinux.eu/#downl...
      It has a very fast package manager, But I only tried it out on intel

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    16. Re: Can it run Flash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      put your damn shoes on hippy

    17. Re:Can it run Flash? by Spliffster · · Score: 1

      Thanks! I'd prefer debian but I didn't bother checking how to install it. After all, at the moment it is only an xbmc box. in the long run i'd like to build a groundstation for my autonomous vehicles on it, then a reliable distor matters more.

    18. Re:Can it run Flash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're completely awesome.

    19. Re:Can it run Flash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You better get some liquid cooling because your sarcasm chip is running hot today!

    20. Re:Can it run Flash? by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      I found some information that implies that the Android version will be 4.4, and I think you can sideload Flash on Android devices, even though it's not supported by Adobe any more. (In fact, I just tried it, and it'll run on my Android 5.0 phone just fine)

      For desktop Linux, I don't think that Adobe has ever released an ARM port of the plugin, so you'd be out-of-luck if you wanted to run a "real" OS, rather than a mobile one. Well, unless Gnash has gotten good enough to be usable for your purposes. It's been a number of years since I tried it, and it didn't impress me then.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    21. Re:Can it run Flash? by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Sure I would, after installing Linux on it. If I wanted to stay with Windows I would try installing the Windows 10 Technical Preview on it, but that might or might not work depending on the hardware in the old system.

      I haven't yet found laptops in the trash that were worth having, but I may be looking in the wrong trash bins. I have found desktop systems that would be fine for occasional use. (Mostly they are from the Pentium 4 era, which means they are power hogs that I wouldn't recommend for server duty.) I'm typing this on a Core 2 Duo laptop that I bought for $75 earlier this year, mostly because I wanted a system with a PCMCIA slot. (Why, you ask? Because I own a pro audio box that connects that way.)

    22. Re:Can it run Flash? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Hiding insecure boxes behind firewalls is NOT any kind of solution...
      A firewall may stop unsolicited inbound scans but thats about all... You can still be attacked via outbound connections that you initiate (e.g. browsing), removable media you insert, files you download etc or from other boxes on the same network behind the same firewall.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    23. Re:Can it run Flash? by kitstrainings4u · · Score: 1

      Hiding insecure boxes behind firewalls is NOT any kind of solution.. KITS Trainings

  3. Better value than RPi, but no composite video out by calagan800xl · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Those ODroid all offer big bang for the bucks, but the Pi is one of the rare single board computers which still offers composite video output, so you can hook it up to your old fat CRT TV, which is great for old-school emulation (eg with the awesome RetroPie distro).

  4. Meh -- already done on a Banana pi by redelm · · Score: 1

    SBCs are nice, but this one isn't really new.

    1. Re:Meh -- already done on a Banana pi by fnj · · Score: 1

      Do you have any skills at all comparing specs?

      The Banana Pi and Odroid-C1 are in quite separate domains. The Banana Pi has SATA, which sets it apart from just about ALL the others. The Odroid-C1 has FOUR USB, which completely set it apart from the Banana Pi. For example, connect a keyboard and mouse to the Pi and you're all done. You've got no USB left. With the C1, you've still got 2 USB left. There's also a significant price difference. The Pi is at least 2/3 more expensive. And half the core count.

      Both of them do blow away the weak, ancient, proprietary shit CPU on the Raspberry Pi.

    2. Re:Meh -- already done on a Banana pi by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Banana Pi is only dual core 1GHz, This is quad core 1.5GHz (Though A5 is slower than A7 clock for clock but at least if we go by arm's DMIPs figures a 1.5GHz A5 core should outperform a 1GHz A7 core), Also note that while the banana Pi looks sorta like a Pi model B it is actually a bit larger, so it won't fit in Pi cases.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    3. Re:Meh -- already done on a Banana pi by redelm · · Score: 1

      And that is the key -- enough CPU to run a "modern" browser. Of course the specs are different -- so are the various unamed RPi model "B" (no fuse, 256MB, with holes, ...). The key with hardware is what it will run.

    4. Re:Meh -- already done on a Banana pi by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      The Pi is at least 2/3 more expensive.

      The final cost will depend on both where you live and what if any distributor arrangements odriod set up. I would be very wary of considering a board cheaper based on headline price alone as the difference between headline price and final cost varies massively.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    5. Re:Meh -- already done on a Banana pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For example, connect a keyboard and mouse to the Pi and you're all done.

      Raspberry Pi Model B+ has 4 USB ports.

  5. XBMC Finally? by Mr.+Droopy+Drawers · · Score: 1
    Does this one have enough horsepower to act as a decently performing media center? I'd like to stream Blue Ray mk4s. I love Raspberry Pis in projects such as my animatronic project, Jose' The Tiki Bird. But, it just doesn't have the guts as a media center.

    -

    Is this the one I've been waiting for?

    --

    To Copy from One is Plagiarism; To Copy from Many is Research.

    1. Re:XBMC Finally? by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Raspberry Pi is kind of in a weird situation, and I can't understand why it really caught on. On one hand, it's overkill for little electronics projects where something like an Arduino would be much better suited. On the other hand, it's not quite powerful enough to act as a respectable desktop or media center. The disk I/O is very lacking because it doesn't support an interace with DMA. Various disk intensive applications like torrents will bring the thing to its knees. If the video doesn't happen to be in a codec that is supported in hardware, then there's no chance of it having the horsepower to decode it.

      As far as media centers go, It makes way more sense to get a low power Intel board that you know will have enough power to do everything, and will be able to run just about any application and run Windows or Linux as you prefer.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:XBMC Finally? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I like to think Rasp Pi got things rolling on ultra-cheap SBCs train. Now there's a whole slew of much better options, but Rasp Pi started it, and I think they deserve some cred for that at least.

      As to actual uses for cheap SBCs in general, I still think there are plenty of places where you could probably use an arduino but it's really convenient to have a kinda-computer.

    3. Re:XBMC Finally? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Disk I/O ?
      All it takes is 8MB/s network traffic to bring the Raspberry to its knees. Mine has been sitting in the drawer for almost two years already. Meanwhile my odroid-u2 board is crunching VPN/SSH traffic 24/7 without any issues.

    4. Re:XBMC Finally? by Enry · · Score: 2

      XBMC was the killer app for this device. I've got two of them in my house for less than I paid for a single x86 XBMC system I was using. Other than that, they're effectively throwaway systems you can use in place of using virtual machines. Want to test out SAMBA as a domain controller? Slap it on, fire it up, and take it for a spin. Don't like it? Your other systems haven't been touched and you can just wipe the Pi and start over.

    5. Re:XBMC Finally? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      I work on both arduino and the pi.

      the arduino is IP-less. its not good at ipstack things. its great at fast looping for device control.

      pi can do the looping on devices AND has a good ip stack with webserver, ipchains, etc.

      neither have much cpu but both have their place. when I want to play with IoT stuff and web-serve sensor data, the pi is the best thing for that.

      I also have a pi being a stratum-1 gps/pps timeserver. cost very little and yet I have a very highly accurate ntpserver at home, just for fun and grins.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    6. Re:XBMC Finally? by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      On one hand, it's overkill for little electronics projects where something like an Arduino would be much better suited.

      That's a pretty subjective statement. It's very dependent on your project. Yea, it's bad as a media player, but that's about as far removed from the purpose of the device as you could possibly get. I think if you complained to the designers about that, they'd laugh in your face. "I bought your weather balloon testbed and as soon as I let the kids use it as a bounce house it popped!"

    7. Re:XBMC Finally? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess the fact that you can plug a keyboard, mouse and monitor in, boot right into a familiar OS environment, and develop and test your code right on the Pi. This makes it a very natural, interactive way to develop for newbie/hobbyist types.

    8. Re:XBMC Finally? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

      you can just wipe the Pi and start over.

      That's what I said, but she was having none of it.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    9. Re:XBMC Finally? by timeOday · · Score: 1
      I have a pi and found the XBMC UI to be awfully sluggish on it. The bigger problem is it can't play the mpeg-ts dumps of broadcast TV I make from mplayer, although there must be some way to make TV broadcasts playable?

      The pi is also too slow to be a thin client for X if you use a WiFi usb dongle, or if you tunnel over ssh. But if you use the ethernet, open the X server on the pi to un-encrypted remote connections (DISPLAY=pi:0 firefox on the client), it is passable for web use, other than flash and videos. I use it to look at howto's in my garage.

    10. Re:XBMC Finally? by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I found that it occupies a spot that wasn't well served. You correctly identified it as packing too much for small electronics projects where things like Arduinos sit but not being powerful enough to be a full flegged desktop/laptop. For embedded thing where and Arduino is too underpowered and a large desktop or laptop is way too much(bulk, power, weight) it fits nicely. This was the space that had been occupied by the Beagle Board and Beagle Bone but those were substantially more expensive when the RPi first came out. It really opened up this space and brought in some competition which anyone would welcome. The mere fact that almost every new board that is coming out is priced reasonably close to the RPi and is offering more should indicate that this was an under served market. I personally have mine setup as a poor mans RTK solution where each RPi has a nice timing GPS+good active antenna attached with one as a roving unit and the other stationary all running RTKlib makes things easy. The fact that I can continuously power the one in the stationary role off of an old car battery for days and use the roving one for a couple 8 hour days on a few Li-ion cells is great.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    11. Re:XBMC Finally? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      XBMC is really only a killer app for the PI if you are willing to make serious compromises just to get a bargain. There are any number of cheap (but not dirt cheap) low profile PCs that run circles around a PI both as a media center and a general purpose machine.

      The PI really not powerful enough for XBMC.

      An Asus chromebox is a much better choice. Makes a decent general purpose box too.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    12. Re:XBMC Finally? by Andurian · · Score: 1

      This well reviewed media box uses the same processor and GPU*

      http://www.gearbest.com/tv-box...

      *The media box simply lists the 450, and the Odroid specifies it's dual core 450. Since the 450 can have up to 8 cores, the media box could have more than the Odroid, but you'd think they'd mention that in the marketing, and they don't.

    13. Re:XBMC Finally? by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      If being a media player wasn't one of it's purposes then why do they have this in their FAQ?

      1. WHAT IS A RASPBERRY PI?

      The Raspberry Pi is a credit-card sized computer that plugs into your TV and a keyboard. It is a capable little computer which can be used in electronics projects, and for many of the things that your desktop PC does, like spreadsheets, word-processing and games. It also plays high-definition video. We want to see it being used by kids all over the world to learn programming.

      Emphasis added. Why point out playing HD video if being a media player wasn't the points of the device?

    14. Re:XBMC Finally? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      I don't think the skeptics ever thought that the PI would make a good XBMC machine. I certainly had my own doubts before I tried it out for myself and confirmed my own suspicions.

      We naysayers are more of a counter to those in the community that gush over the PI as a media center.

      Although the WHOLE POINT of general purpose machines is that they get used for things that the manufacturer never would have imagined.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    15. Re:XBMC Finally? by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      *one of the points* that is.

    16. Re:XBMC Finally? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The UI can be made much faster, overclocking, use a recommended SD (Class4 AFAIK), use a lighter skin, disable thumbnails etc - plenty of guides.
      I got it from unbearable to perfectly usable, far faster than my TV providers set-top box.
      Less useful these days as iplayer and 4od addons no longer work for me, but I still use it for youtube vids on the big screen queued from laptop using a browser plugin.

    17. Re:XBMC Finally? by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      At the price it was at the time it was released, it really was something special. It wasn't a supercomputer but for people that wanted something cheap that was effectively a throwaway computer, there wasn't anything like it.. People have fought it all the way, complaining that they can get this soekris board for $400, or that Intel board for $200, or an arudino that can't run Linux.

      Now, years later, the Raspberry Pi "killers" have finally caught up in the price field, Like the Banana Pi if you can get one, or this Odroid-C1. Raspberry will have to step up its game or face irrelevance.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    18. Re:XBMC Finally? by Xolotl · · Score: 1

      I've been running RaspBMC since I got my first Pi (first-gen Model B) and it is a great media center, at least if your media is encoded with the codec(s) it has hardware support for and you spend the $3 or whatever for the licence code. I now have a B+doing the job for the extra USB ports (wifi dongle, Logitech K400 dongle, 2 USB disks) and beefier power. It has no problems with full HD video at all.

      The one thing I have noticed is that you really need to get a good, fast (micro)SD for the system, something like a 30MB/s Sandisk Ultra. It makes no difference to the video playback, but the UI is much more responsive.

    19. Re:XBMC Finally? by langelgjm · · Score: 1

      On one hand, it's overkill for little electronics projects where something like an Arduino would be much better suited.

      Kind of. But if you want network connectivity for an Arduino, the cost starts to add up very fast. In contrast, you can get a Pi with a built-in ethernet port, or stick in a cheap WiFi dongle.

      They recently released the A+, which is $20. You can get USB Wifi dongles for under $10, add $5 for an SD card, so for about $35 you've got a dev board with WiFi. Compare that to the Arduino ethernet shield, which by itself is over $45. The WiFi shield is even more.

      The only thing comparable I can think of is the Electric Imp - I've been playing with one over the past few weeks. It's $25 for the unit, which includes built-in WiFi, and $12 for a breakout board. They provide an online IDE that is very easy to use. However, the whole platform is web-hosted, which makes me pretty uncomfortable.

      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    20. Re:XBMC Finally? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      The Raspberry Pi A+ is a good Arduino competitor; I2C, SPI, PWM, the PCB is actually smaller than the Arduino Uno R3 (standard Arduino footprint), and uses 100mA at idle (compare to 35mA at idle for the Arduino idling in non-sleep mode).
       
      I haven't measured the A+ with the HDMI port turned off but at 100mA it's very competitive powerwise and runs a full linux stack, but has enough horsepower to do computing like OpenCV, encrypted wifi, and has full access to mathmatica and it's API now for highly optimized computing tasks, making it ideal for a robotics project. The Native PWM isn't so great but with I2C you can talk to a 16 channel PWM daughterboard for about $15 more.
       
      Oh, and it's about half the weight of a BeagleBone Black, even if it's less powerful.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    21. Re:XBMC Finally? by psm321 · · Score: 1

      Sorry for going off-topic, but would you mind sharing details of your RTK setup? (i.e. what GPS/antenna?) Thanks!

    22. Re:XBMC Finally? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Can you share your code on that project? That's actually a very useful tool.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    23. Re:XBMC Finally? by by+(1706743) · · Score: 1

      With a compatible A/V receiver, I am able to play raw blu-ray videos on my Raspberry Pi. With an audio format that's unsupported for passthrough (e.g., TrueHD), then it's unusable (luckily, there's usually another 5.1 channel in addition to TrueHD, albeit at lower quality). Streaming over the network can be problematic for certain high-bandwidth films, but a local disk works well for almost everything I've thrown at it. (Unsure why network is an issue -- with an NFS share I can get north of 9MB/s, which should be enough...more overhead somewhere, I guess...)

    24. Re:XBMC Finally? by anagama · · Score: 1

      I don't personally know the answer to this, but I was interested too. There is a video on one of the articles linked in the the summary showing it doing various things, including video, and based on that, it looks promising. I can say that I've wasted far more than $35 on finding out a thing is crap, so this seems a pretty low risk proposition to try this thing out.

      Anyway, here's the video link:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      I probably wouldn't do the video thing, but if there was a way to make to the arduino libraries that come with Sparkfun or Adafruit gadgetry, this thing has the power to do some pretty interesting stuff, and a lot of it all at once.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    25. Re:XBMC Finally? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      The Raspberry Pi is kind of in a weird situation, and I can't understand why it really caught on. On one hand, it's overkill for little electronics projects where something like an Arduino would be much better suited. On the other hand, it's not quite powerful enough...

      This bed is too hard, this bed is too soft, this bed is just right. Yes, it's overkill for trivial tasks, it's underkill for high-powered computational tasks. It's just right for lots of things in between. I've got one running a Winlink RMS gateway using a Pi-TNC for radio to internet communications, and another as the gateway computer (just inside the router) for a data collection network to provide ntp, smtp, snmp, logging, etc services on the network. I had a second one on the same network to control two cameras that needed serial commands. And another that does nothing but collect temperature data and put it on the net.

      And sometimes just being able to program in a real programming language is valuable. Like the serial command to cameras program that I was able to write and debug on a desktop and then port with only trivial changes to the Pi when it came time to put the final network together.

    26. Re:XBMC Finally? by fnj · · Score: 1

      The Arduino Pro Mini blows away both the normal size Arduino and the Raspberry Pi in terms of power drain and size, since you mention those attributes specifically. As well as cost. Heck, even the Teensy 3.x blows them away. And with either the Pro Mini or the Teensy 3.x you don't have to resort to addon crap for PWM.

    27. Re:XBMC Finally? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Raspberry Pi is kind of in a weird situation, and I can't understand why it really caught on.

      So I used it to play a chess game with people using Amazon Mechanical Turk to get the moves, and then use those moves to make real physical chess moves with a robotic arm. The solution needed to 1) be dedicated 24 hours/day on network connection 2) needed to run Java to use the AWS Mturk API 3) needed a USB connector to talk to multi-servo controller (dedicated controller needed to support a large number of servos with high accuracy) 4) HDMI to cheap monitor to let people know what was going on.

      The Pi was a perfect solution.

    28. Re:XBMC Finally? by Enry · · Score: 1

      I don't care if a low profile PC is faster. I can do BluRay 1080P playback without a problem on the Pi for a $35 investment. It doesn't download torrents or play live TV, but I either don't want it to do that or have other ways of doing it. I don't see XBMC as the sole entertainment source, just to play back movies and TV shows.

    29. Re:XBMC Finally? by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      The GPS modules are U-blox LEA-6t and you can find the info necessary for getting one here. The company that makes the module is synergy systems and the antennas I got from them is this one. From what I remember the first module was $35 and the second one was $70, I forget what the antennas were but there was a 10% discount they give to the home tinkerer market on the regular priced module and antennas. Instructions on getting the modules can be found in the diydrones link as you couldn't just order it online at the moment. The company was very helpful in getting me what I needed and answering my continuous stream of questions.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    30. Re:XBMC Finally? by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      ON windows i use MCEbuddy to automatically convert .wtv to .mp4.

      --
      Good-bye
    31. Re:XBMC Finally? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got sick of the Raspberry Pi and the politics of its organisation.

      So I put my money where my mouth is and bought a HummingBoard I1 to try as a media centre. It runs openelec (supported system) zippier, better and works perfectly.

    32. Re:XBMC Finally? by jandrese · · Score: 1

      The Pi is actually surprisingly good at streaming video, but with a big list of caveats. The biggest is that it is only good at streaming 2 (3 if you pay a little extra money) formats. Luckily one of them is mp4 so it's not a complete disaster, but anything it can't do on the GPU is too slow to be useable. XBMC's interface is also a poor choice for the Pi, as it is not GPU accelerated on the Pi and quite slow as a result.

      The Broadcom chip on the Pi is really designed to stream video. The CPU is almost an afterthought, and is mostly there to service the USB controller and feed data into the GPU.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    33. Re:XBMC Finally? by jandrese · · Score: 1

      It doesn't help that the Raspberry Pi foundation finally released an update after 2 years...and left the specs almost completely unchanged. Not even a badly needed speed bump on the CPU or an ARM architecture update that makes it less of a pain in the butt to support. Not even a RAM bump, even though many many apps (XBMC included) bump into the RAM limit on the Pi constantly, severely degrading its performance.

      The situation is so ridiculous that overclocking is officially supported on their default distro (Raspbian) in the installer. It really helps too. Even a little 300Mhz clock bump makes the Pi feel twice as fast (mostly from the increased clock on the RAM). Unfortunately, in my experience the built-in "turbo" mode is generally over aggressive with the Core and GPU and you'll eventually get crashes when doing 3D games or hitting the USB controller (and remember, the networking on the box is all USB).

      For what it is worth, if you have Samsung memory (Hynix sucks), I've had good success across several Pis with the following config:
      arm_freq=1000
      sdram_freq=600
      core_freq=400
      gpu_freq=333
      avoid_pwm_pll=1
      over_voltage=6

      This setup plays Quake3 smoothly (mostly) at 1280x1024 and runs Chromium reasonably well if you don't have too much other stuff open (beware hitting the memory limit though, swapping on the Pi makes it nigh unusable--no more than 2 or 3 tabs open at once). Another caveat: The analog audio will be crackly with this config, use HDMI audio or remove the "avoid_pwm_pll" line and reduce core_freq to 333 to match the gpu_freq. I don't have any of the B+s to try it out, but given the extra couple of years they've had I expect them to overclock even better than the old model Bs. If you are one of those poor suckers with a Hynix Pi, you are probably going to have to remove the sdram_freq line as well, it just doesn't overclock for beans.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    34. Re:XBMC Finally? by Nexzus · · Score: 1

      I've also found if you offload pretty much everything to other devices (thumbnail storage, media database) and run it from USB storage, it can be fairly snappy.

      If you're playing high bitrate videos, it's also recommended to use NFS mounts with udp

      --
      Karma: Can only be portioned out by the Cosmos.
    35. Re:XBMC Finally? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      The onboard PWM for the arduino is fantastic, but there's not enough dedicated PWM for robotics unless you're just doing a 4DOF robot arm or something, which is why I mentioned the 16 channel PWM, which allows you do do 4DOF per limb. I have the PWM shield from adafruit, just picked up their non-denominational daughterboard (same chip, more generic mounting format) for the A+ this week.
       
      And yeah those CH340G based Arduino Nano clones you can pick up off of ebay for $4 shipped are pretty amazing, they run for over a day off of an old nokia candybar cellphone battery, I have one running an SSD1306 OLED and temp sensor that stays charged off of a tiny solar panel.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    36. Re:XBMC Finally? by by+(1706743) · · Score: 1

      Likewise, I love mine, and it works great even on raw blu ray files. No passthrough on TrueHD is the only stumbling block, but hardly a big deal as those discs usually have AC3 or similar as well.

      That said, how successful have you been with high bitrate (read: raw blu ray files) over NFS shares? I'm using mine (NFS with UDP), and dd claims I'm getting north of 9MB/s, which should be plenty for the ~50Mb/s of blu ray. However, it often stumbles over NFS. Local (USB disk) is generally fine, though. Any thoughts greatly appreciated...currently, I'm using:

      mount -t nfs -o nfsvers=3,udp,ro,noatime,rsize=131072,nolock $SERVER:$SHARE $MOUNTPOINT

    37. Re:XBMC Finally? by psm321 · · Score: 1

      Thanks! :)

    38. Re:XBMC Finally? by einsteinbutthole · · Score: 0

      hmm. what's your setup?

    39. Re: XBMC Finally? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not the GP but I have used a Ras pi as a media centre for the last 2 years. I use OpenElec with the Confluence Mod skin. Streaming music over Ethernet from a NFS share works well, as does the MythTV frontend. The BBC broke iPlayer recently but the community had a working plugin within a couple of days. 4oD doesn't work because they use HLS and there aren't any FOSS libraries for that yet, and there'll probably never be Netflix support.

      The Android XBMC remote is great for playing music without needing to put the TV on.

    40. Re:XBMC Finally? by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      No problem. It took me months of digging until I just happened upon a source that had some info. I would love it if manufactures realized that there was a market for better devices that people can tinker with that aren't crippled. If more people ask and purchase from a company that is willing to serve them then it becomes clear that there is a market that isn't being well served elsewhere. Also those LEA-6t modules are really nice if you want to do other stuff with them like have a proper stratum 1 time server as they have 2 useable pps lines that can be set at different highly accurate frequencies.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    41. Re:XBMC Finally? by Nexzus · · Score: 1

      If you're still reading this:

      I think that rsize is way too high. Someone on the XBMC forums scripted copying a large amount of data from mounts with various options. He found the best rsize was 32768.

      --
      Karma: Can only be portioned out by the Cosmos.
    42. Re:XBMC Finally? by psm321 · · Score: 1

      I've actually been using a NEO-6M hacked to do timing output (because I hadn't found any affortable 6t's yet), but the procedure to get it to do that is annoying, and the antenna that came with it is a piece of crap. I'm going to go ahead and inquire with synergy to see if they still have these (don't see them on the website) and probably order. So thanks again :)

    43. Re:XBMC Finally? by by+(1706743) · · Score: 1

      Great, thanks for responding. I believe I tested various settings and found that this worked well for my setup, but perhaps my test environment was a little contrived (I think I just dd'd a few hundred megs). Will give 32768 a shot though!

  6. Definitely a neat little board. by blueshift_1 · · Score: 1

    I'm torn over forcing audio out of HDMI. Though to keep the cost down, you have cut some things to add others. This is definitely a neat little board and would be great for a mini test cluster. But I feel like Pi still has that prototyping advantage. But I definitely am glad to see some similar priced alternatives in the market.

    1. Re:Definitely a neat little board. by timeOday · · Score: 1

      You could get one of those $8 USB sound cards for it, although $8 is kind of a big upgrade for a $35 computer.

    2. Re:Definitely a neat little board. by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      http://www.amazon.com/gp/produ...

      $15 or less, plays audio at up to 96k (does not support 88k, though, but does support 44/48/96 and full 24bit). what's cool is that its driverless (UAC1 mode) and has opto digi out!

      screw hdmi audio. full of drm. go with spdif and free your audio stream! ;)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    3. Re:Definitely a neat little board. by fnj · · Score: 1

      But I feel like Pi still has that prototyping advantage.

      All right, since the C1 has exactly the same GPIO pinout and functionality except for 3 pins used by the ADC which the Pi doesn't have, why do you believe that the Pi has the prototyping advantage?

    4. Re:Definitely a neat little board. by blueshift_1 · · Score: 1

      Most of what I've done with the Pi tends to have at least some sort of basic audio output. It's rather nice to just push it out of the 1/8" rather than convert from the HDMI. I guess I should have put a disclaimer in there -> [for my needs]

  7. Also, "mostly similar"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF does that mean?

    1. Re:Also, "mostly similar"? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Yes.

    2. Re: Also, "mostly similar"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe it lands somewhere between 50% similar and 100% similar.

    3. Re:Also, "mostly similar"? by valinor89 · · Score: 1

      From TFA: "Yet, the C1’s connector does appear to be fairly compatible, as it uses the Raspberry Pi-compatible, open source WiringPi library for C/C++ or Python developers. The project notes that only pins 37, 38, and 40 are not compatible with the Pi B+, as they are dedicated for analog inputs."

    4. Re:Also, "mostly similar"? by Obscene_CNN · · Score: 1

      It means its still ARM based and thus it sucks!

      --
      I don't want to do a sig now
    5. Re:Also, "mostly similar"? by dimeglio · · Score: 2

      How so? ARM processors are quite plentiful and support several operating systems already. Perhaps you're just not very familiar with them. Not to worry. There's plenty of material available.

      --
      Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
    6. Re:Also, "mostly similar"? by davester666 · · Score: 2

      Sorry, it's worthless unless it has "Intel Inside" on the box. At least that is what the TV keeps telling me.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    7. Re:Also, "mostly similar"? by Obscene_CNN · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How so? ARM processors are quite plentiful and support several operating systems already. Perhaps you're just not very familiar with them. Not to worry. There's plenty of material available.

      I've designed embedded computers and written boot rom code and ported kernels to arm and other processors. While arm has a more intelligent design to it than an x86 its still far behind other processors with its 16 registers (MIPS,PowerPC,etc have 32 plus a few dedicated ones). It also lacks in the fact that it must have its address space split in half to support I/O. The only thing arm does well is conserve power.

      --
      I don't want to do a sig now
    8. Re: Also, "mostly similar"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      64 bit arm has 31 registers

    9. Re: Also, "mostly similar"? by Dishevel · · Score: 2

      Quit with the facts. I want to hear him rant more.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    10. Re:Also, "mostly similar"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 THIS!

      Actually ARM's CPU design is quite shit. Which is where cortex came from, or an attempt to improve the shit design to something less shitty by some guys in Austin. Qualcomm(and seems like Apple and nVidia) are also trying their hands at making ARM better by mostly designing their own CPU components that are compatible with the ARM instruction set of a given fscked product map. Yes I have a Cortex-A9azedB1C2 ARMv7aJZSK1 versus your Cortex-A9azedB1C2 ARMv7aJZSK1a both of which may or may NOT have option components XYZ yet still retain the same fscking model designations.

      On the plus side ARM might manage to surpass AMD in IPC but they re-hired the K8 guy, so it looks like that plan might be in the shitter.

    11. Re:Also, "mostly similar"? by Obscene_CNN · · Score: 1

      On the plus side ARM might manage to surpass AMD in IPC but they re-hired the K8 guy, so it looks like that plan might be in the shitter.

      Keep in mind that while arm may have just beat AMD in IPC. The number of instructions it takes to do something with ARM is higher than it is on an x86

      --
      I don't want to do a sig now
  8. Re:Better value than RPi, but no composite video o by jcdr · · Score: 0

    I think that the last time I used a composite video signal was about 10 years ago to playback the video from a camera recorder with a magnetic tape.

  9. Powersupply by Cigamit · · Score: 2

    Don't forget to add in the cost a 5V 2A power supply if you don't have one laying around. Unlike the Pi, this can't be powered through the micro USB port.

    1. Re:Powersupply by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      It's still a 5V, 2A device though, isn't it? An old USB cable with one end cut off and a jack soldered on will still mean you can power it from a hub. That said, using USB as your power source can start all sorts of fun. Maybe you try to plug it into a device that only supplies 1A, or maybe it's one of those "smart" devices that doesn't power up until it detects a device, but that means your board doesn't get powered, which means that the hub doesn't power up, so the board never powers up...

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    2. Re:Powersupply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can you power it off of UART from PC? because that is a neat thing in a PI

  10. Re:Better value than RPi, but no composite video o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    What is the url for this compo site, and what is so good about the video signals from it?

  11. gay specs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you would think someone on earth would come up with something like this but with a couple Ethernet ports, a gig of ram and a decent chip to make a open source VPN router. they seem to all be circling around the same gay thing, puttering with 'puters.

    Why not go for the throat, cisco, d-link, TP etc. and acually make hardware that would best this junk?

    Isn't the user base of the tens of vpn and firewall projects pretty big?

    1. Re:gay specs. by ionymous · · Score: 1

      -10 for the use of "gay" as a negative term
      +10 for the idea

    2. Re:gay specs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he was inferring that the female-female Ethernet ports would be a "gay" configuration.

    3. Re: gay specs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still requires a double ended plug

  12. or you could buy Android TV stick by user.aaaaa · · Score: 1

    or you could buy fake chinese Android TV stick from Omozon for $40 (with all cables... memory.. power supply.. sound... hdmi... wifi... with access to android market.. yes it is "too simple", no geeky things..)

  13. MPEG-2 on RPi by SIGBUS · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Note that you have to buy a codec license to activate the Raspberry Pi's MPEG-2 support. Once you've added the license key to your config.txt, XBMC will handle MPEG-2 just fine; I can stream shows from my MythTV backend without any problem. But, the sluggish interface is a bit of a problem, especially when using an IR remote.

    --
    Oh, no! You have walked into the slavering fangs of a lurking grue!
    1. Re:MPEG-2 on RPi by timeOday · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's just the licensing. I am using mplayer -dumpstream dvb://xx and the .ts files it generates don't seem compatible with most players except mplayer itself, and don't seem to work on XBMC. What would be a better option for grabbing DVB from the command-line? One requirement is for the player to be able to start replay and skip around inside the file while before it is done recording.

  14. Wonder if the OTG port can be used as a peripheral by Qzukk · · Score: 1

    Our company had looked at putting together the Pi and a few pieces to build a device we could sell to our customers but we had the issue of configuring each device individually, which at the point we abandoned it meant hooking up a keyboard and tv and editing configuration files. If we could have mounted the device over USB it would have simplified configuration, we could have written a program that could be run on a PC by an end user to set up networking in cases where dhcp isn't possible.

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  15. I'll buy one when it runs SystemD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only then will it be a worthwhile linux machine!

    1. Re:I'll buy one when it runs SystemD! by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1

      it.... does. :/

    2. Re:I'll buy one when it runs SystemD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it.... does. :/

      Thats amazing! I thought the chips die size would have be tripled to handle all the extra bloat ;\

  16. Re:Better value than RPi, but no composite video o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pi b+ doesn't have analog video anymore. got to use a Bannana Pi for that. The extra GPIO pins were handy though.

  17. Max ethernet output by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know the theoretical maximum ethernet output for this? I know it would have to be limited by a bus speed of some sort.

  18. Re:Better value than RPi, but no composite video o by petermgreen · · Score: 2

    It still has it, they just moved from two seperate connectors for analog video and audio to one 4-pole connector.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  19. But I want SMALLER by Fished · · Score: 1

    More power, speed, etc. is nice. But what I'd really like is something even smaller than an rPi (and cheaper) that is still capable of running a reasonable linux distro. So far, I've come up empty. Don't need hdmi or sound, just USB. Anybody know of anything like this?

    --
    "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
    1. Re:But I want SMALLER by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

      Raspberry Pi A+?

  20. What the hell is wrong with the RPI community ? by SilenceBE · · Score: 2

    When I heard about the RPI I was very enthusiastic. The premise of cheap computers, give kids a possibility to tinker, maybe spark a whole industry of these kind of things. Maybe even ending in cheaper and more faster RPI'like systems kicking the boundaries away.

    But every f*cking time somebody comes up with a cheaper, faster, ... board they take a very aggressive stance and everyone that comes up with an ARM board is trying to steal their customers away. It is as ridiculous of complaining about holes and a 40 pin connector, you can bet this board will be branded as a rippoff.

    I thought the whole idea was of giving children a cheap way to tinker with hardware, so what is the problem with cheaper / faster boards that come on the market ? The whole premise seems to be a lie and I have the feeling the whole RPI thing has more to do with personal ego's than al the fluffy spin... .

  21. Re:Better value than RPi, but no composite video o by fnj · · Score: 1

    25 years for me, and it was lame then.

  22. Re:Wonder if the OTG port can be used as a periphe by BaronAaron · · Score: 1

    I can think have 5 ways you could have accomplished the goal of network configuration without a keyboard and mouse off the top of my head.

    1. The Pi A's USB port can be configured for slave mode. The B doesn't support this but not sure if you needed a B.
    2. You can fake a USB device over the GPIO ports on both the A and B through various bitbang techniques.
    3. You can use the UART pins and a USB to UART chip which wouldn't be a very expensive add on.
    4. Add a DHCP server to the Pi, so when connected directly to a PC with ethernet, the PC gets an IP from the Pi. Your PC program can then connect to the Pi for final network config.
    5. Add a cheap two line LCD and some push buttons to your device. Create a simple text driven menu for configuring the network through that.

  23. Actual cost by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    The big question with this is what will the actual cost be? last time I bought an odriod product I had to pay the price of a fairly steep delivery charge to odriod and the dreaded courier VAT collection fee and of course the VAT itself. I don't remember exactly what it was in my case but according to http://forum.odroid.com/viewto... the final cost of of an "$89" U2 plus a "$9" HDMI cable shipped to the UK was £108.83.

    If we assume the same delivery charge for the new board as for the U2* and that it still ships from outside the EU on a regular courier service**, and that they tell the truth on the customs form then the final price will be about $35 (board) + $30 (shipping) + ~£10.5 (brokerage) + ~£9.5 VAT = ~£68.

    Whereas with a rasperry pi I pay the distributors listed price for the Pi itself (which is marginally higher than the raspberry pi foundations nominal price) and the VAT (delivery is "free") final cost of a "$35" raspberry pi B+ is £27.44.

    Of course i'm in the UK which skews things a bit in the Pi's favour, other places the calculation may work out different but still comparing nominal prices is only a very rough way to compare the cost of SBCs.

    * I can't check easilly if odriod's delivery charges have changed or even if this board is actually available yet because odriod's main site seems to have been /.ed
    ** Some couriers are now offering all-inclusive services where the seller handles collecting the VAT and brokerage costs are consolidated across multiple shipments, but in my experiance only a handful of vendors use them.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    1. Re:Actual cost by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      If we assume the same delivery charge for the new board as for the U2* and that it still ships from outside the EU on a regular courier service**, and that they tell the truth on the customs form then the final price will be about $35 (board) + $30 (shipping) + ~£10.5 (brokerage) + ~£9.5 VAT = ~£68.

      Maybe you should canvas the UK and EU to see what the potential market is.

      If it's large enough, you could go into business as an online shop, have a big crate of them brought in on a barge, reducing that shipping and brokerage charge, but you're on your own for the VAT. Then you sell at a price between your cost and what it would cost to buy from the states(or wherever).

      Opportunity is limited though, I'd expect chinese versions to be available for much less fairly quickly.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    2. Re:Actual cost by petermgreen · · Score: 2

      Update: now i've managed to get on odriod's site and get some answers to the question. It seems they now offer a $9 shipping option for low value orders and they are using the postal service which tends to have marginally lower brokerage charges than couriurs. That makes the updated estimate.

      $35 (board) + $9 (shipping) + ~£10 (brokerage) + ~£5.60 VAT = ~£43.6.

      They also link to a store in germany that sells their products but said store doesn't have the C1 listed yet.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  24. Re:Wonder if the OTG port can be used as a periphe by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

    I can think have 5 ways you could have accomplished the goal of network configuration without a keyboard and mouse off the top of my head.

    6. Pull the "hard disk" off the Pi and stick it in a card reader on any other computer, edit the files you need to and put the disk back.

    7. Use the native DHCP client on the Pi to let it get an address from your existing DHCP server and ssh into it.

  25. Re:Wonder if the OTG port can be used as a periphe by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

    9. Program it to be configured over keyboard only, using the lock-lights for feedback (Connect keyboard, press enter until lights flash three times, type in IP address/netmask/dns/etc, lights will flash to confirm each in turn).

    10. IPv6 link-local address + Avahi.

    11. Default IP address somewhere out the way, like 192.168.99.99 - configured PC accordingly, connect to IP, use web browser to configure. Just like almost every home router and access point I've ever encountered.

  26. Ethernet boot? by Lussarn · · Score: 1

    Will this boot over ethernet?

  27. Re:Also, by robvdl · · Score: 1

    It means its still ARM based and thus it sucks!

    Slow? seriously? Really depends what you're doing with it, I have a BeagleBoard XM 1ghz single core, running Ubuntu 14.04 LTS. I use it as a server to run web apps written in Go, they absolutely fly on this little board. You just have to make sure you try not to hit the disk too much because it's just an SD card. This little quad core board will be the perfect upgrade to the Beagleboard XM for running my Go webapps as I gain more cores and it's running @ 1.5ghz, also it supports an eMMC card which is going to be an improvement over the SD card when it comes to disk speed. One of the things with the Raspberry Pi is that it was based on an older ARM chip that Ubuntu didn't support so you had to run Raspbian instead. I've held onto my BeagleBoard XM because it's a newer ARM v7 chip that can run Ubuntu 14.04 LTS unlike the Pi. I can cross compile my ARM binaries on my desktop for the ARM v7 target and run them straight on the BeagleBoard. Hoping this new little ARM board is ARM v7 also but it probably is.

  28. Re:Wonder if the OTG port can be used as a periphe by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    2. You can fake a USB device over the GPIO ports on both the A and B through various bitbang techniques.

    Do you know anyone who has actually achived this on a Pi or are you just speculating.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  29. Re: What the hell is wrong with the RPI community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Most of the competitors to the pi are junk. They're unsupported, not open source. Some only run an android. Their chip is located on the bottom of the board and risks overheating. Etc etc.

    But the spec nerds go crazy for them. Imagine if some Chinese factory that produces cell phones suddenly came out with something with slightly better specs than an iphone 6 or a samsung note/nexus whatever. Now imagine hordes of kids from slashdot and Engadget jizzing over the press release and signing up for preorder only to find that after actually using the device that there was little to no quality testing or design phase. Their new phone is faster, brighter and sexier than yours. But the plastic case starts fading and cracking. A pixel dies. The USB connector becomes loose. A capacitor/resistor/transistor pops. ...in the end it's just a cheap Chinese clone with higher specs. They don't care about their reputation because that's not in their business model or their charter statement. They got their money, you got a new shiny. And then they go back to producing stuff for other companies.

  30. DVR for the Car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My MythTV setup records in mpeg4. (Hauppauge HD-PVR) Files play back just fine on the RPi with RaspBMC without any special licenses. Even HD works, though SD works better (smaller files sizes, bandwidth throughput better supports seeking & skipping around). Supports USB-sticks. Power works well off car USB power adapters. DVD players from Walmart (automotive section) can take an external Composite input. Add in a wireless mouse, and it all just rocks for kids on long car trips.

    Now if I can just get an external battery pack to act as a uninterruptable power supply....

  31. Ethernet by Change · · Score: 1

    Not only is it GigE, it's off of an on-chip MAC, unlike the Raspberry Pi which uses a USB Ethernet interface.

  32. Interesting by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    Hardkernel used to be one of the #1 purveyors of Samsung Exynos development boards (The other being Insignal). Unfortunately, both Insignal and Hardkernel's BSPs for Exynos boards tended to be vastly outdated. (Hardkernel was even violating the GPL with some of their Android 4.2 releases for some of the Exynos 4412 boards for a while - putting up binary images with no source code in sight.)

    Now even Hardkernel is putting effort into non-Haxxinos boards...

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  33. Raspberry Pi is not open source hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Most of the competitors to the pi are junk. They're unsupported, not open source.

    The Raspberry Pi is not open source hardware, it never has been. You can't even get the gerbers nor full documentation on the Broadcom BCM2835 SoC, let alone the full design files.

    In contrast, competing boards like Beaglebone Black and Olimex's OLinuXino range like the A10-OLinuXino-LIME, A20-OLinuXino-LIME and A20-OLinuXino-LIME2 are fully open source hardware with all the information being provided. In the best tradition of open source, everyone is welcome to make their own derivatives using these open materials. All four boards are also substantially more powerful and flexible than the RasPi, very well made and fully supported.

    The Raspberry Pi Foundation has declined to make the RasPi open source hardware despite years of requests from the community.

  34. Re:Better value than RPi, but no composite video o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be honest the reason I originally chose to go with a Pi for one of my projects was specifically for the composite video out. Along with the plans of using sync stripper to inject an overlay into the video feed. Since then I have scrapped just about every aspect of my project that involved the composite video out, moving towards networked streaming alternatives.

    Not unlike the way I moved in short order from trying to figure out how to manage everything on the limited IO of the Pi to cramming everything under the sun into an I2C bus. So to be honest I think I would personally prefer an alternative with more horses under the hood assuming that there is sufficient support for the new device.

  35. Re:Also, by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

    Hoping this new little ARM board is ARM v7

    TFS states that it's a Cortex-A5. That family of chips implements the ARMv7 instruction set. Cortex-A5 looks like it's a little less powerful per-MHz than a Cortex-A8, but the higher clock and core count should mean that it's much more powerful than the Beagleboard XM. I don't get the focus on Ubuntu, though. There's no real benefit to running that instead of Debian.

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  36. They force you to buy their eMMC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hardkernel provides Ubuntu, but only if you buy one of their overpriced memory units. The source to their modified Ubuntu will be released next year.

    If you want the device, an OS on eMMC, power, a video cable, and a battery to keep your clock running, this thing costs $87.

  37. Yikes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, that hardware blows RPi out of the water! I want!

  38. Re:Also, by Dishevel · · Score: 1

    Could be that he is familiar with Ubuntu and would prefer to just move the stuff over with zero worry instead of very little worry.

    --
    Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  39. Re: What the hell is wrong with the RPI community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See, this is what the grandparent was talking about:

    (...) they take a very aggressive stance (...)

    And here you are calling things junk on the basis of generality, one that isn't contrary to the claim that was made.

  40. where is the link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    where is the link?

  41. User experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone tried this board with XBMC?