Slashdot Mirror


Facebook Offers Solution To End Drunken Posts

First time accepted submitter blueshift_1 writes Remember that photo that you posted to Facebook sophmore year of college when you thought there was nothing more important than partying and letting everyone you knew how hard you partied? Well facebook is now trying to buzzkill every one of those moments. With their upcoming feature, they'll be using photo analysis algorithms to detect how intoxicated you were in the photo and suggest that you not post it. Which in the end, is probably for the best.

134 comments

  1. Wooohoooo!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    FIRST POOOOP!!!! i GOT this

    1. Re: Wooohoooo!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      God, I hate this fucking iPad. Can't even render slashdot right.

  2. In order to complete this post... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    In order to complete this post, please enable your microphone and say the alphabet backwards.

    1. Re:In order to complete this post... by SpzToid · · Score: 0

      Am I allowed to use a Search Engine?

      --
      You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
    2. Re:In order to complete this post... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congrats! Please touch your nose with your elbow to continue.

    3. Re:In order to complete this post... by s.petry · · Score: 0

      I wonder if they have to pay patent royalties to Vince Vaughn and Owen Wilson since they invented this app during their Google internship?

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    4. Re:In order to complete this post... by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they have to pay patent royalties to Vince Vaughn and Owen Wilson since they invented this app during their Google internship?

      The inspiration for that came from the Google Labs thing for GMail that did just that, introduced years before that movie^H^H^H^H^Hrecruitment ad. It literally pops up a math problem for you to solve before GMail will let you send the email out to determine your level of intoxication.

    5. Re:In order to complete this post... by Darinbob · · Score: 0

      Um, why? No, I mean zee!

    6. Re:In order to complete this post... by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      please enable your microphone

      Not necessary on an Andriod phone where FB already has access to use the microphone without telling you--and you can't disable this without root.

  3. next up, used in cars ... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 0

    ... "I'm sorry Dave, I can't let you start the vehicle."

    If you fail the visual test, the car makes you take a breathalizer.

    1. Re:next up, used in cars ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's to stop the passenger (whom has no driver's license) from taking it on his behalf, or even a hacked car system?

    2. Re:next up, used in cars ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's to stop the passenger (whom has no driver's license) from taking it on his behalf, or even a hacked car system?

      Still better than nothing.
      If the drunk driver has a sober passenger that is OK with him driving then at least one sober person is willing to put his life on the line on this driver being careful enough, despite intoxication. It's not better than a sober driver, but its still better than the alternative of a drunk driver without supervision. (What we currently have.)
      Even if its just a friend or a stranger passing by that helps the drunk driver starting the vehicle without being a passenger a sober person has made the call that this person is capable of driving. Is it the wrong call to make? Yes, but with some luck those occurrences will be few and far between.

      This is a typical case of perfect being the enemy of good enough.

      There is also the saying "Make a system foolproof and only a fool would use it."
      You don't want a system that inconvenience the sober driver too much, if you have a system that can't be circumvented there is a risk that it won't be used at all because of all the hoops it puts the driver through. It's better to have a flawed system that still improves the situation if there is a likelihood of it being used.

  4. No thanks by rodrigoandrade · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I hereby declare that I can take care of my own posting and am fully responsible for my actions, drunk or otherwise.

    Fuck you Big Brother.

    1. Re:No thanks by AchilleTalon · · Score: 5, Informative

      You will still be able to post your drunken pictures, the only thing this application will do is to ask you if you really want to do it given the content or the likely content to be at your disadvantage. You can still decide to post it anyway. It is just like a pat on the back: Are you sure you want to do this?

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    2. Re:No thanks by danknight48 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You will still be able to post your drunken pictures, the only thing this application will do is to ask you if you really want to do it given the content or the likely content to be at your disadvantage. You can still decide to post it anyway. It is just like a pat on the back: Are you sure you want to do this?

      If i am in the process of having a shit, I dont need someone to ask me the question of "Am i sure i want to do this?".

      We are all capable of making our own decisions, without the need for verification. Those that need verification prompts to exist in our society, need to seriously rethink their basic thought process and self control.

    3. Re:No thanks by plover · · Score: 3, Funny

      Those that need verification prompts to exist in our society, need to seriously rethink their basic thought process and self control.

      That's exactly what this tool is for. Those that could benefit from verification prompts are completely unaware that they even have a problem. It's possible that some of them may start questioning their life choices as a result.

      Of course, it's also likely to gamify alcoholism: "Dude, Facebook says I've posted drunk for 100 days in a row, that's gotta be some kind of record."

      --
      John
    4. Re:No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We are all capable of making our own decisions,

      I think I see a flaw in your argument.

    5. Re:No thanks by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      Those that need verification prompts to exist in our society, need to seriously rethink their basic thought process and self control.

      Apparently you've either never been around anyone who was drunk or you're so incompetent in your own decision making that you think drunk people make good decisions and have self control.

    6. Re:No thanks by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Funny

      We are all capable of making our own decisions

      I think you are getting drunk wrong.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    7. Re:No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are all capable of making our own decisions,

      I think I see a flaw in your argument.

      Well, he/she didn't say "good".

    8. Re:No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this going to help anything? I mean the idea was just accepted as great thanx to intoxication in the first place so the answer would be - hey great that is what I wanted to do in the first place you stupid machine!

    9. Re:No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As they say: You can't fix stupid.

    10. Re:No thanks by fisted · · Score: 2

      If i am in the process of having a shit, I dont need someone to ask me the question of "Am i sure i want to do this?".

      Might not be the worst idea to have this, since by this analogy you're taking a shit in public

    11. Re:No thanks by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      How exactly is this "Big Brother"? You were about to post the picture anyway, and if Facebook's computers can tell that you're drunk, so can any human being looking at the picture.

    12. Re:No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SUGGEST that you not post it

      What part of that don't you understand, dumbass?

    13. Re:No thanks by gshegosh · · Score: 1

      I won't post it? Hold my beer!

    14. Re:No thanks by Oligonicella · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes... Well, your last snark is exactly why this is a bad thing. Facebook's algorithms will no doubt have false positives and Facebook will **no doubt** keep these statistics. As with other stats, these can find their way out of Facebook's altruistic hands.

      That last, by the way, was a snark. At least the word altruistic.

    15. Re:No thanks by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      Of course, it's also likely to gamify alcoholism: "Dude, Facebook says I've posted drunk for 100 days in a row, that's gotta be some kind of record."

      Posting a picture of someone who is drunk is not the same as "posting [while] drunk". This prompt will not stop the latter.

    16. Re:No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >having a shit

      God damn foreigners, what is that even supposed to mean?!

    17. Re:No thanks by rhazz · · Score: 1

      I'm not drunk, I have ptosis you insensitive clod!

    18. Re:No thanks by bledri · · Score: 1

      We are all capable of making our own decisions, without the need for verification. Those that need verification prompts to exist in our society, need to seriously rethink their basic thought process and self control.

      It must be tough being perfect in an imperfect world. See, I can be judgmental too. That was fun.

      Gravity forbid we use tools and technology to help us make better decisions.

      --
      Some privacy policy Slashdot.
    19. Re:No thanks by plover · · Score: 1

      Actually, I wasn't trying to be funny or snarky. I do know some people who would take it as a challenge to drunk-post every day; I also know people who sadly couldn't post any other way. And yes, I don't see Facebook voluntarily deleting data on anything their subscribers do.

      --
      John
    20. Re:No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh, this isn't big brother. it's uncle mark.. but he has his dick up big brother's ass and does whatever he wants.

    21. Re:No thanks by Meski · · Score: 0

      And requests from Smirnoff wanting you to 'friend' them.

    22. Re:No thanks by Meski · · Score: 1

      verb, I hope, not noun.

  5. Yet another law enforcement tool? by geekmux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So when Facebook compiles all of this information into one large data set and labels the results file "underage drinking" to sell to law enforcement, we won't be surprised at all when arrest rates increase in highly targeted areas with great "success", right?

    The power to abuse large data sets should not go unnoticed, and there are quite often more reasons than one to justify a new feature or service.

    1. Re:Yet another law enforcement tool? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So when Facebook compiles all of this information into one large data set and labels the results file "underage drinking" to sell to law enforcement, we won't be surprised at all when arrest rates increase in highly targeted areas with great "success", right?

      The power to abuse large data sets should not go unnoticed, and there are quite often more reasons than one to justify a new feature or service.

      Someone PLEASE!! think of the CHILDREN!!!

    2. Re:Yet another law enforcement tool? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Law enforcement already has APIs to interrogate all of the US based social media sites. The question is: when will they start using it dragnet style?

    3. Re:Yet another law enforcement tool? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So when Facebook compiles all of this information into one large data set and labels the results file "underage drinking" to sell to law enforcement, we won't be surprised at all when arrest rates increase in highly targeted areas with great "success", right?

      The power to abuse large data sets should not go unnoticed, and there are quite often more reasons than one to justify a new feature or service.

      How is that abuse? If Facebook could make a heat map of where underage people are drinking, why would you not want to know that?

      Remember that the reason why underage drinking isn't legal is because there's a correlation between death, kidnapping, etc. and underage people being drunk. You'd *want* to be able to prevent those deaths, kidnappings, and date rapes by keeping a close eye on those areas when you know there's a lot of intoxicated 17 year old out.

      Don't get me wrong, I think think of *millions* of other uses of this technology that would be abuse, but this isn't one of them.

    4. Re:Yet another law enforcement tool? by geekmux · · Score: 1

      So when Facebook compiles all of this information into one large data set and labels the results file "underage drinking" to sell to law enforcement, we won't be surprised at all when arrest rates increase in highly targeted areas with great "success", right?

      The power to abuse large data sets should not go unnoticed, and there are quite often more reasons than one to justify a new feature or service.

      How is that abuse? If Facebook could make a heat map of where underage people are drinking, why would you not want to know that?

      Remember that the reason why underage drinking isn't legal is because there's a correlation between death, kidnapping, etc. and underage people being drunk. You'd *want* to be able to prevent those deaths, kidnappings, and date rapes by keeping a close eye on those areas when you know there's a lot of intoxicated 17 year old out.

      Don't get me wrong, I think think of *millions* of other uses of this technology that would be abuse, but this isn't one of them.

      So, it makes sense to march society towards a Minority Report pre-cog enforcement solution?

      Boy, won't that be fun. Can't wait until there's drones flying over every human head on a constant lookout for ANY activity that is deemed illegal. Or immoral. Or whatever other line we want to freely grant our illustrious leaders to draw around society and abuse the living shit out of.

      Yeah, I get it. Won't someone think of the "children". But if it's effective, it likely won't be long before this monitoring feature starts scanning and reporting on other activities too. As I said before, there is often more than one reason these solutions are baked up, and when you own the largest database of HUMINT on the entire planet, it tends to be ripe for abuse.

    5. Re:Yet another law enforcement tool? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2009

  6. Or You Could Just Not Drink To The Point of Intox by rsmith-mac · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not to be preachy, but it always strikes me as odd to what lengths some people will go to mitigate the damage their drinking does, rather than exercising just a bit of self control and not drinking to the point of intoxication. Having to make computers take care of us in this fashion and stop us from harming ourselves just seems silly.

  7. false positives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how many false positives will the algorithm yield. And how people get offended by these FPs.

  8. Re:Or You Could Just Not Drink To The Point of Int by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At the very least, you should have enough self control to not post pictures when you are totally drunk.

  9. They came in second by bickerdyke · · Score: 1
    --
    bickerdyke
  10. hhow will HR discriminate? by EzInKy · · Score: 2

    No, this is wrong...totally wrong. HR departments need a way to filter out all the partiers and drunkerds. Facebook has become their number one tool in choosing which employees to discriminate against.

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
  11. Drool proof society by manwargi · · Score: 1

    This is a symptom of a number of problems including how much employment has become tied to Facebook, but in particular this seems to be the next level of enabling individuals to avoid responsibility for their own actions.

  12. Re:Or You Could Just Not Drink To The Point of Int by xvan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sometimes, drinking to the point of intoxication is the point.

  13. CAPTCHAs by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    Instead of fancy breathalizer equipment, making people read a bunch of letters and numbers is probably enough.

    1. Re:CAPTCHAs by oodaloop · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Indeed, a literacy test should drastically reduce the number of posts on Facebook.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  14. really? by niksakl · · Score: 1

    So, a bot will be giving advice to drunk college freshmen to act reasonably... Sure, we all know how well it works when you (as a real human who cares) say to someone: "Dude,don't do that please, it's stupid, you're drunk and you're gonna regret it"...

    1. Re:really? by N!k0N · · Score: 1

      So, a bot will be giving advice to drunk college freshmen to act reasonably...

      Sure, we all know how well it works when you (as a real human who cares) say to someone: "Dude,don't do that please, it's stupid, you're drunk and you're gonna regret it"...</quote>

      "Shutup and hold my beer. This is gonna be awesome!"<br/>
      (2 hours later, in the ER) "So ... 'awesome', huh?"

  15. Partway There by Bob9113 · · Score: 2

    detect how intoxicated you were in the photo and suggest that you not post it. Which in the end, is probably for the best.

    Not bad. Now if we can just get them to suggest that you not post things when you don't look intoxicated, they'll have covered all the cases where not posting things to Facebook probably for the best.

  16. Re:Or You Could Just Not Drink To The Point of Int by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not to be preachy, but it always strikes me as odd to what lengths some people will go to mitigate the damage their drinking does, rather than exercising just a bit of self control and not drinking to the point of intoxication. Having to make computers take care of us in this fashion and stop us from harming ourselves just seems silly.

    Implying that narcissistic addicts of social media could or should exercise good judgement and self-restraint?

    Oh, that's fucking rich.

  17. Just delete them. Be the Uberfacebook Parent by gelfling · · Score: 0

    And then institute a downmodding scheme like /.

  18. Friends don't let friends use Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Friends don't let friends use Facebook

  19. F**K Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Stuff like this is why I deleted my facebook in the first place. They are jut as bad as google and many many others. They don't care about privacy or civil liberty.

    1. Re:F**K Facebook by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Stuff like this is why I deleted my facebook in the first place.

      So you were running a Facebook competitor but decided to halt all the operations due to seeing how bad the datamining was getting? Well, thanks for doing the responsible thing.

    2. Re:F**K Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't blame the phone company when you drunk dial. Same with Facebook.

  20. Re:Or You Could Just Not Drink To The Point of Int by markass530 · · Score: 1

    woooooooooosh

  21. I think I get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So when a douche with a fake tan and popped collar tries to upload a selfie he's going to get "Dave are you sure want to do this? My circuits detect 97 % chance of viral mockery"?

  22. Re:Or You Could Just Not Drink To The Point of Int by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe we should start teaching our children coping mechanisms for life and how to entertain themselves, so they don't grow up and turn to alcohol at every opportunity.

  23. Why end the only redeeming feature of Facebook? by gatkinso · · Score: 4, Funny

    Seriously.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    1. Re:Why end the only redeeming feature of Facebook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How am I going to remember my Saturday nights now?

  24. Re:Or You Could Just Not Drink To The Point of Int by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't matter. Others will take photos of you without you know it, then post them for the LOLs. I guess you don't get out much, or socialise.

  25. I thought drunks by The+Real+Dr+John · · Score: 1

    were the only people still posting on Facebook

    --
    A brain is a terrible thing to waste... Mind? That's debatable.
  26. Re:Or You Could Just Not Drink To The Point of Int by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not to be preachy, but it always strikes me as odd to what lengths some people will go to mitigate the damage their drinking does, rather than exercising just a bit of self control and not drinking to the point of intoxication. Having to make computers take care of us in this fashion and stop us from harming ourselves just seems silly.

    You say not to be preachy and then you preach? The entire point of your post was to preach and you think you can disown that by saying "not to be preachy". That's no different than saying "not to be preachy but you really should take Jesus and your lord and savior, and soon". If you want to try and push your morality on others, at least have the balls to own what you're doing.

  27. wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    So all of my facebook posts are going to be deleted?

  28. Re: Or You Could Just Not Drink To The Point of In by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't have much self control when totally drunk. That's the point of getting drunk. Get a life, buddy.

  29. Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Facebook needs to provide the answer to privacy, that is what they need to provide. And you have none is not the best answer,

    1. Re:Facebook by koan · · Score: 1

      Yeah i would have posted a statement that stupid as AC too.

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  30. Re:Or You Could Just Not Drink To The Point of Int by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a middle ground, just moderate how often you get immoderately drunk. For me, anyway, getting drunk every month or two is a nice way to relax and let loose.

  31. Re:Or You Could Just Not Drink To The Point of Int by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not to be pedantic, but, the L and the S should be capitalized. If you were drunk while writing this post, we'll understand.

  32. Contrary Thoughts by JimSadler · · Score: 2

    There are many people who suffer from a lousy self image. They may feel that they are the only ones who have ever done stupid things. It can be quite theraputic to realise that almost all people have really humbling moments and actually be able to see people that you deal with every day during those moments. If you had the flu and found yourself on the bathroom floor spewing from both ends your mind has a snapshot of what you felt you looked like. How about being able to see your boss under very similar conditions? Or how about the night your banker got drunk and punched his wife and left home in cuffs in a squad car? I doubt there is anyone out there that has not had times when they looked or acted like they belonged in a trash dump.

    1. Re:Contrary Thoughts by koan · · Score: 1

      Or the doctor about to perform surgery on you, or the pilot about to fly 300 people across the ocean, or your SO in a 3 way with a couple of bisexual, intravenous drug using Haitians.

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  33. Re:Or You Could Just Not Drink To The Point of Int by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "turn to alcohol" is a very judgmental attitude. I love drinking - I like the taste of great wine, beer and drinks, and I like the feeling of intoxication and enjoying life with others while intoxicated. Doesn't mean I can't enjoy, or cope with, life when not intoxicated, but I don't have to choose just one or the other.

  34. Re:Or You Could Just Not Drink To The Point of Int by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Intoxication is entertainment. Try it sometime.

  35. Did you know by koan · · Score: 1

    Facebook has immediate access to your phone number details, like name, address etc?

    FB on your phone or registered FB, the instant you put that number in there they have all the details.

    As I stated previously it's become a ubiquitous login as well, allowing FB all of that 3rd party data, I wonder when people will become uncomfortable with this level of access, with the psych profile built off of their data and actions.
    I don't think most people get it.

    Kind of sad that most people I talk to say they can't quit Facebook or they would lose touch with their friends and/or family.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    1. Re:Did you know by n6kuy · · Score: 1

      Facebook doesn't have my phone number or address. Why would anybody give them that info?

      --
      If you disagree with me on social issues, then it's pretty clear that you are a narrow-minded bigot.
    2. Re:Did you know by koan · · Score: 2

      If you're using FB on a phone they do, if your friends or someone related to you has it in their contacts, etc.
      If you give it to them...

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    3. Re:Did you know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facebook believes my phone number is 123-456-7890. I love Android :)

  36. Obligatory XKCD by hackertourist · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Obligatory XKCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really related, but I'll give you a C for the effort.

  37. Re:Or You Could Just Not Drink To The Point of Int by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

    We have an unhealthy societal perspective regarding alcohol, which you are indicating right there in your post. The drinking done by these people is probably not causing a great deal of harm, but we have an unprecedented level of access to cameras and semi-permanent communications. Therefore, this otherwise healthy activity can have harmful effects on your career or personal life.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  38. Google already launched this feature for texts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did Facebook hire Owen Wilson and Vince Vaughn away from their Google internships? Man, those guys are good.

  39. Personal Responsibility is lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We should not protect people from themselves. Stopping them from posting such pictures will not prevent their failure in the future. Let them fail and learn or just fail.

  40. Is this technologically feasible? by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    Facebook is doing some interesting research. Is it even possible to determine, from a picture, if someone is drunk? Do you start with face recognition algorithms, and look at the face? Can the algorithm learn body language? I am skeptical on this.

    Fashioning such a tool is largely about building image recognition technology that can distinguish between your drunken self and your sober self, and using a red-hot form of artificial intelligence called “deep learning”—a technology bootstrapped by LeCun and other academics—Facebook has already reached a point where it can identify your face and your friends’ faces in the photos you post to its social network, letting you more easily tag them with the right names.

    Identifying one's face is not barely even AI any more. The fingerprint is based on the distance between the facial features. Yes, neural networks and things are good at finding those features, so AI is involved to some degree. Identifying some vague concept like drunkenness based on a facial recognition algorithm seems like a big step. I'll be impressed if they can do this with any reliability. I bet you could do better looking at the GPS coordinates of the picture, proximity to bars, the people in the picture, and the time of day. Maybe that is more like what they are doing, than actually judging the image itself.

    P.S. This is supposed to be a tech blog. How sad is it that a story about deep learning AI yields nothing but a series of jokes about drunkenness?

  41. Will be completely ignored by wired_parrot · · Score: 1

    they'll be using photo analysis algorithms to detect how intoxicated you were in the photo and suggest that you not post it

    ... Except that most of the time the people taking those photos are posting them while they are intoxicated, and therefore the suggestion not to post won't have any effect

    My impression is the regret in taking these drunken pictures happens years after the fact, when the drunken college scene has been left behind, and the poster now has a family and a 9-to-5 job and they want to distance themselves from that past. Trying to tell college students that they shouldn't be posting inappropriate pictures of themselves drinking is futile, the warning will be completely ignored.

    1. Re:Will be completely ignored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you want to distance yourself from your past? If you did things you were ashamed of, own them. Don't be one of those people with hangups, you'll teach other people all about your insecurities, and then they can take very egregious advantage of you.

  42. Reading the title I was thinking Facebook was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    trying to make Di-Oxy Di-Fluorine and hoping that it was within a few feet of the Muther-Zucker's office.

  43. Fake Drunk Selfies by nicoleb_x · · Score: 1

    So now all the 13 year olds will be faking a drunk selfy to see if Facebook gives them the knock-knock. I suspect this will actually encourage them to drink. I can hear it now: "Dude Facebook thinks I'm drunk, how cool is that!"

  44. Re:Or You Could Just Not Drink To The Point of Int by WhatHump · · Score: 1

    Sometimes life gives you more than you can handle, and you just want to shut out the entire world. Like the loss of a child or partner. It's not an elegant way of dealing with the problem, but alcohol is cheap, legal and pretty effective in numbing your brain.

    --
    "Could be worse...could be raining." Igor
  45. Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the CIA has this THING for anal hydration.

    Did they start that because George W. Bush is a big fan of Gay Sex?

    ha ha

  46. I solved it by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    I solved it before them. Don't drink, ever. Works for me.
    On that subject, if it calls one single photo of me drunk, we're gonna have a big fucking problem. I don't ever upload a single photo of me for privacy reasons but still.

  47. Here's a crazy idea.... by bobbied · · Score: 1

    How about we just mandate that Facebook (or any other website that keeps personal information) be required to DELETE any and ALL history over a specific age. I figure that anything more than a year old is worthless to just about everybody anyway, but make it something like 7 years. That way, your unfortunate college posts won't haunt you all your life.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  48. Facebook drinking game by PPH · · Score: 1

    Everyone drink, post and repeat. Until Facebook warns you to stop.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  49. Re:Or You Could Just Not Drink To The Point of Int by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same here, except opiates don't really have that taste aspect to them.

  50. "not our content" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't this start to draw a distinct line in the sand concerning content management on the site? Haven't sites like FB generally escaped legal issues associated with usr's illegal posts based on the argument they aren't reasonable for the content?

    So if you CAN generate an interface or filter to prevent or dissuade certain questionable content, how is it that the next step wont instantly be the Gov't requiring similar filters/features "to prevent or dissuade" ________. ------ you favorite hot topic item (guns, abortion, porn, police abuse)

  51. I am Facebook-free since 2004 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never bothered signing up for an account. Am I missing out much?

  52. Re:Or You Could Just Not Drink To The Point of Int by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not to be preachy, but

    Have you ever noticed how the words, "Not to be ___________, but," always seem to precede a bunch more words that are the epitome of ____________?

    I have!

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  53. Nanny state vs. nanny corporation... by matbury · · Score: 1

    I guess people in the US are so aversed to the idea of the nanny state and the gubbermint telling them what to do for their own benefit that corporations have had to step in to fill the poor impulse control and diminished responsibility void. Great, now people in the US can get their moral advice from egocentric, autistic, sociopathic corporations instead.

    1. Re:Nanny state vs. nanny corporation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Government is your god
      Government is your king
      Government is your lord and savior
      Worship it to entreat its favor
      Government is the source of everything
      Government, our god and king!

      When will these college educated people get over their Love Affair® with government? Answer, they will never do so because they had to please their crusty, unwashed, malodorous, stinky, squalid and disgusting sociology professors and their careers are in occupations not involved in that dirty filthy expletive called mark[BLEEEEEEEEEP!]

  54. Too bad... by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

    I was thinking of making profile on Facebook.
    Now I'll have to pop on over to that competing social site, Drunkbook and create one there.

    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
  55. Re:Or You Could Just Not Drink To The Point of Int by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "This photo appears to show you passed out and covered with obscenities written with a Sharpie. Do you want me to Photoshop them out?"

  56. Re:Or You Could Just Not Drink To The Point of Int by Dragonslicer · · Score: 2

    When someone starts a sentence with "I don't mean to be...", there's at least a 99% chance that they mean to be.

  57. Re:Or You Could Just Not Drink To The Point of Int by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    Everything in moderation - including moderation.

  58. And why about the people that have .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And what about those people with disabilities or possibly a person that has suffered a stroke and may look as though they are drunk or intoxicated in there pictures? Sounds like a Lawsuit waiting to happen, but heck I am sure FB can just drop the money to make it go away.

  59. Re:Or You Could Just Not Drink To The Point of Int by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But getting intoxicated IS THE POINT of drinking!!!

  60. Re:Or You Could Just Not Drink To The Point of Int by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This! Thank you for saying that! I can't believe how many Puritans seem to exist these days and they need to be told off. You did a better job than I'm about to.

    I drink. I like to get drunk. I don't do dumb crap when I get drunk. I don't get drunk a lot but when I do, I do it properly. That includes not being a hazard, not taking pictures, and not allowing pictures to be taken of me, particularly by anybody who knows who I am. It's actually possible.

    Attention prohibitionists: go away. You're annoying.

  61. Un-PC solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are studies about which groups are most prone to alcohol abuse. Map the IP's and screen accordingly.

    1. Re:Un-PC solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      White teenage girls everywhere are angry with you.

  62. Re:Or You Could Just Not Drink To The Point of Int by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    When someone starts a sentence with "I don't mean to be...", there's at least a 99% chance that they mean to be.

    The same can probably be said of "With all due respect..."

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  63. My suspicion by OhSoLaMeow · · Score: 1

    My suspicion is that /. could use this even more...

    --
    They can take my LifeAlert pendant when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
  64. Re:Or You Could Just Not Drink To The Point of Int by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

    "With all due respect" is accurate but imprecise. It's technically true, it just leaves out the detail that all the respect that the person is due is none.

  65. Re:Or You Could Just Not Drink To The Point of Int by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    With all due respect, when I write "with all due respect" I mean it. Now, I'm not saying that the "due respect" is positive for any individual case....

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  66. Veto power by man_ls · · Score: 1

    Really, Facebook should add a feature that let's anyone in a photo veto its entire publication on the site. They already have great facial recognition algorithms - I should be able to completely remove a photo of me that my friend posted, instead of just removing the tag.

  67. Re:Or You Could Just Not Drink To The Point of Int by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're familiar with the idea of a tipping point right? Some people have the same problem of runaway feedback loops on a macro scale as they might otherwise have on a micro scale. Their ability to have self control in the short term just convinces them to get closer to the addiction "event horizon" until they find that hairy edge where they've found the limit of their own self control.

  68. Re:Or You Could Just Not Drink To The Point of Int by bledri · · Score: 1

    Not to be preachy, but it always strikes me as odd to what lengths some people will go to mitigate the damage their drinking does, rather than exercising just a bit of self control and not drinking to the point of intoxication. Having to make computers take care of us in this fashion and stop us from harming ourselves just seems silly.

    Believing that it's silly to use technology to help people make better decisions when they are impaired seems silly to me. Doubly so on a site supposedly for people that are into technology.

    --
    Some privacy policy Slashdot.
  69. So, no more FaceMash then ? by savuporo · · Score: 1

    Zuck , it took you what 11 years to learn that FaceMash was probably not the best idea ?

    http://dublindigital.ie/origin...

    --
    http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slashdot.org Errors found while checking this document as HTML5!
  70. Re:Or You Could Just Not Drink To The Point of Int by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

    and I'm sure some or even most of that could be attributed to many of the first settlers being Religious fanatics

  71. Damn Facebook by LessThanObvious · · Score: 1

    Anyone have a polite way of telling people that you don't want them to take digital photos of you without sounding like a paranoid antisocial weirdo?

    I only use really bad blurry pictures for my own profile pics on the web and I don't let people tag me in posts, but the sheer number of pics that I show up in online without my consent means most likely Facebook and the like will ID me even though I don't participate. It really annoys me that even in party situations the social norm is not to ask for any consent or even tell people you are about to take a photo. They just want to document their social life for world to see and I want the opposite, a completely undocumented social life.

  72. Re:Or You Could Just Not Drink To The Point of Int by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same here, except opiates don't really have that taste aspect to them.

    That is the reason I (AC you replied to) prefer alcohol over drugs. I don't really have anything against most drugs, but I just *also* enjoy the taste of great drinks while getting intoxicated, great wine, great beer, great drinks. And (probably pretentious), appreciation of that has for me come with putting a bit of interest and money into what I drink.

  73. "you" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As if. Like we're drunken sorority sluts or frat-boys. I should hope the Slashdot crowd is above this sort of hood rat debauchery.

  74. pristine records for a prissy nation by epine · · Score: 1

    My impression is the regret in taking these drunken pictures happens years after the fact, when the drunken college scene has been left behind, and the poster now has a family and a 9-to-5 job and they want to distance themselves from that past.

    It shocks me how rarely the cultural underpinnings are made overt in these scenarios. What you depict might actually be the case in America, but I suspect it will be different in France, where when a search pulls up no college revelry whatsoever, cultured individuals might begin to seriously doubt your breeding and character.

    Whether posting photos of regular drunkenness counts as bad judgement has a circular basis case. If you get yourself photographed draping and drooling over some chick who looks none too impressed with the group grope, there might be some legitimate flags raised. Multiple binge-ups during school session might also raise eyebrows, even in France. It sure won't accentuate that embarrassing C- you received in Economics 101 because of the "family crisis".

    Daryl Hannah's distal indecency. In America, s/irony/context/g.

    (I had forgotten that this clip also contains some good geek humour, though slightly dated and with just a hint of cheese.)

  75. Re:Or You Could Just Not Drink To The Point of Int by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Mmmmmm. Northern Lights, Purple Urkel, Chocolate Kush, Silver Haze, Ozark mountain Retardo, Trainwreck.

    In that order. With a small course of food and a nice drink between rounds. Trainwreck on the couch.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  76. Re:Or You Could Just Not Drink To The Point of Int by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Even better, you get to entertain those around you. They all love it.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  77. yea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why bother, people will make fools of themselves no matter what. Like protesting and destroying your own town. You see a person for who they really are when they are drunk.

  78. Re:Or You Could Just Not Drink To The Point of Int by sound+vision · · Score: 1

    Sometimes? What are the other times?

    I know a lot of people have come up with "Well, I like the taste..." but that's BS. Ethanol is a gross tasting solvent and we drink it for one reason, to experience its effects. In the past, it was safer to drink than certain other things because of the antimicrobial effect, but that's been beside the point for 100 years.

  79. Re:Or You Could Just Not Drink To The Point of Int by Baki · · Score: 1

    One of the effects of drinking, is that it lessens self control.

  80. Re:Or You Could Just Not Drink To The Point of Int by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I assume the GP was making a distinction between drinking a smaller amount to get "tipsy" or "buzzed" but not enough to get heavily impaired.

    There's also another major reason to drink which is social pressure.

  81. reverse it for the facebook customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can I use the drunken person search engine to find the best drunken pictures? Or have it arrange the drunkest pictures on top for the person I am looking into? Will it assign a rating to each person so I can quickly see a facebook drunkeness score so I can toss their resume?

  82. Re:Or You Could Just Not Drink To The Point of Int by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

    There is a reason that shooting Heroin is called 'having a taste'. It's because it does have a taste when injected.

    --
    The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
  83. For once Facebook is doing something good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can get on board with this one, now if they could just suggest that you not join during the signup phase.