Slashdot Mirror


'Revolving Door' Spins Between AT&T, Government

An anonymous reader sends this quote from the Center for Public Integrity: That AT&T just won an eight-figure contract to provide the federal government's General Services Administration with new mobile devices isn't itself particularly notable. What is: Casey Coleman, an AT&T executive responsible for "delivering IT and professional services to federal government customers," oversaw the GSA's information technology division and its $600 million IT budget as recently as January. ... While there’s no evidence anything illegal took place, the public still should be aware of, and potentially worried about, Coleman’s spin through the revolving door between government and companies that profit from government, said Michael Smallberg, an investigator at the nonpartisan watchdog group Project on Government Oversight. ... Federal government employees leaving public service for lucrative private sector jobs is commonplace. The Project on Government Oversight has called on the federal government to — among other actions — ban political appointees and some senior-level staffers from seeking employment with contractors that “significantly benefited” from policies they helped formulate during their tenure in government.

8 of 61 comments (clear)

  1. We don't care. We don't have to. by turkeydance · · Score: 4, Funny

    We're the Phone Company. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    1. Re:We don't care. We don't have to. by Mal-2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Take a look at the technician in the background. Does he look familiar? He should. It's Al Franken.

      Too bad he didn't go on to be elected to the Senate or anything like that.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  2. Re:Buying new "mobile devices" from AT&T? by pla · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Surely the government's wasting our tax dollars

    You really didn't need the rest of those words.

  3. sometimes regrettable, somewhat necessary by raymorris · · Score: 3, Insightful

    TFS does a fine job of pointing out the potential drawbacks of the fact that people at the top of their field tend to remain in that field as they change jobs. Since the potentially negative side is somewhat clear, I won't say more on that, just acknowledge it.

    On the other hand, suppose you're hiring someone to negotiate contracts to build roads. Wouldn't it be a good idea to hire someone who knows something about road-building projects, and the contracts involved? A former manager of a road-building company is uniquely qualified to understand the issues, the ways a road company
    company might try to screw over the taxpayers. They are far better able to protect the taxpayers' interests than I would ben for example, because I don't know anything about road contracts. So I WANT my taxpayer interests represented by someone with high level experience in the industry.

     

  4. Re:sometimes regrettable, somewhat necessary by jythie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A well thought out post touching on the complexity in dealing with a contentious issue.

    What exactly are you doing on slashdot?

  5. What a shock by epyT-R · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This article and the one before it about hollywood vs google are indicators of the same problem. When government and industry collude, the public becomes the enemy.

  6. Re:sometimes regrettable, somewhat necessary by Noah+Haders · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the real solution here is to put pressure on the govt employees so there has to be a "cool down" time after they conclude their govt service and before going to a regulated company. For example 12 months. This way you can't be the lead govt guy, then jump to a private company when it's time to negotiate a multi-lucre contract. NOTE: the best way to put pressure on somebody is to have them sign to a "cool down" clause when they are hired. Typically you do this by $$$, i.e giving someone an extended vacation.

  7. Yeah, Revolving Doors are Cool by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 4, Funny

    They always seem to be trying to make up their minds. On Star Trek doors go sheesh! but we have revolving doors that go Whump! Whump! Whump!

    I'd have three revolving doors, two on the outside rotating in opposite directions and one in the middle that changes direction at random times, even when a person is in it. I'd put wheels on a potted plant and have it bumping along. I'd have one in a shaded area with a bright strobe light in it. I'd have a revolving door with mirror panels surrounded by a curved mirror and a curved, mirrored sliding shells that advance with the door on opposite sides and stop, to close off the tube completely and trap them for three full rounds, then advance again to present an opening as if it had always been there. I'd have a revolving door with rising and falling wedges that 'arrive' at the far end one step down or up. I'd have a camera at the top of the wedge looking down, and a bright LCD display set into the floor that is re-playing the top-down view from the last occupant, including a glimpse of the screen with the one previous, et cetera. I'd have a message that says, "say Hello!" and play back the hellos of previous occupants at random. I'd have a glass floor with a hypnotic spiral disc spinning quickly in the opposite direction. I'd have a narrow brightly lit aquarium with fish as door panels. I'd have a gauntlet of a dozen revolving doors synchronized to pass occupants on, each one lit with a progressive hue of the rainbow. And ping pong ball releases.

    Next up at Slashdot: 'Escalator' Trundles Between Verizon, Government

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>