Slashdot Mirror
BT To Buy UK 4G Leader EE For £12.5 Billion
DW100 writes: The UK mobile market looks set for a radical shake-up after BT confirmed it is now in final stage discussions to buy EE for £12.5bn. The move will see the telecom giant return to the mobile market for the first time in over a decade and make the company the leader in both fixed and mobile markets. Whether or not telecom regulator Ofcom will agree to such a deal, though, remains to be seen.
No. You're correct that post-sell off BT Cellnet became O2, but EE is a completely different network that was formed by the merger of the Orange and T-Mobile UK operations. BT was in discussions to buy back O2 but opted for EE instead so O2 will remain a separate operator.
The worst and second worst ISPs in the UK are joining forces to create a perfect storm of uselessness.
Fuck their products, fuck their services, just fuck them.
Wanna buy a shirt?
https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
Apart from British Gas (obviously), BT are the worst company in the UK.
To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
You are assuming they are all acronyms - BT is not, it used to be an acronym for British Telecom but that changed ages ago as the company was colloquially known as "BT" and thus chose to change its name to BT. EE also isn't an acronym, but again it used to be for "Everything Everywhere" but again the company renamed itself.
The "UK" is, but 4G arguably isn't, its the common name of a technology.
My friends who use it, assure me that EE stands for "Extremely Expensive".
Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
As a BT Customer, I can assure you that it stands for "Bloody Terrible", and the buyout is only feasible because the telecomms regulator is as toothless as a wet cabbage.
My friends who use it, assure me that EE stands for "Extremely Expensive".
As an EE user I have to disagree. It actually stands for "Eencredibly Eencompetent."
As I discovered when they contacted me to suggest I go from Pay-As-You-Go to Pay-Monthly, on a plan that was actually financially advantageous. Only to find out the next time I was abroad, a week later, that there was no roaming activated on Pay-Monthly. I spent a week attempting to get through to customer service with no success ("We estimate we'll be with you in 1m", for an hour and a half). When I finally managed to get through to them back in the UK, they gleefully told me that roaming could only be activated on pay-monthly if you'd been with them for over a year (W... T.... F.....).
I calmly explained that it was *them* that had contacted me to switch plans, when I'd been using the roaming facility on my PAYG for a week out of every month in the past year, so could they kindly get their thumbs out of their arses and fix it or cancel my plan entirely. And suddenly it wasn't so much of a problem to instantly activate my roaming.
Why am I still with them? Best coverage in the UK and abroad, and best prices for my (very non-average, admittedly) usage pattern. But holy shit, are they ever incompetent.
The word 'separate' probably meant to imply "separate from BT", rather than "separate from all other parties". They may well be owned by Telefonica, but they have absolutely no current connection to BT.