Slashdot Mirror


Webcast Funerals Growing More Popular

HughPickens.com writes: Lex Berko reports in The Atlantic that although webcasting has been around since the mid-1990s, livestreamed funerals have only begun to go mainstream in the last few years. The National Funeral Directors Association has only this year introduced a new funeral webcasting license that permits funeral homes to legally webcast funerals that include copyrighted music. The webcast service's growing appeal is, by all accounts, a result of the increasing mobility of modern society. Remote participation is often the only option for those who live far away or have other barriers — financial, temporal, health-related — barring them from attending a funeral. "It's not designed to replace folks attending funerals," says Walker Posey. "A lot of folks just don't live where their family grew up and it's difficult to get back and forth."

But some funeral directors question if online funerals are helpful to the grieving process and eschew streaming funerals live because they do not want to replace a communal human experience with a solitary digital one. What happens if there's a technical problem with the webcast — will we grieve even more knowing we missed the service in person and online? Does webcasting bode well for the future of death acceptance, or does it only promote of our further alienation from that inevitable moment? "The physical dead body is proof of death, tangible evidence that the person we love is gone, and that we will someday be gone as well," says Caitlin Doughty, a death theorist and mortician. "To have death and mourning transferred online takes away that tangible proof. What is there to show us that death is real?"

4 of 70 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Funerals are already disconnected from reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Good point. The visibility of death has been completely abstracted away. The most anybody sees now is the few minutes hospital staff barely allow before forcing you out of the room. What pisses me off more than the joke that funerals have become is how family is treated in a hospital. The basic grieving process is removed, as you're not even permitted any decent amount of time with the body. Your right to grieve no longer exists.

  2. Re:Not surprising really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "I remember them, too."

    "Tell me about them."

  3. Re:Not surprising really by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Funerals aren't for the dead - they're for the living. Try giving the eulogy at your parents' funeral, with your sisters and your uncles and aunts there. You'll "get it."

    Just like the drunken party^Wwake afterwards is also for the living. 'Cuz it sure won't wake the dead, but it takes the edge off of people standing around like a bunch of stiffs, not knowing how to say how they feel.

    Me, I just want them to donate my body to science and go directly to the wake.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  4. Funerals aren't only about the dead. by Hussman32 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you go to a funeral, it's to comfort those who have lost a loved one; these people will often travel to make it. Sometimes they can't. If there is a way to pay your respects when you can't travel, then a webcast is better than hearing about it, at least you hear the eulogy and the next time you see the family you can at least talk about the service.

    One could argue we're taking away the personal aspect, but I doubt anyone who would have went to the funeral would skip it if the webcast were available. This is a good thing for those in bad times.

    --
    "Who are you?" "No one of consequence." "I must know." "Get used to disappointment."