Slashdot Mirror


FBI Confirms Open Investigation Into Gamergate

v3rgEz writes In a terse form letter responding to a FOIA request, the FBI has confirmed it has an open investigation into Gamergate, the loose but controversial coalition of gamers calling for ethics in gaming journalism — even as some members have harassed and sent death threats to female gaming developers and critics.

31 of 556 comments (clear)

  1. Who? by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Which ones are they investigating? The drama-mongers or the drama-mongs?

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Probably the frothing horde that sends out death threats and threatens to shoot up universities. There aren't two sides in #gamergate, just #gg, their victims, and people who think #gg are idiots.

    2. Re: Who? by maccodemonkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wait wait what? The FBI investigating threats against a "commoner" is now reason for concern? Gosh, I'm sorry you feel it's so alarming that the FBI has decided to take a phone call from one of the little people.

    3. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "There aren't two sides in #gamergate, just #gg, their victims, and people who think #gg are idiots." ... and the victims of those that think #gg are idiots, and trolls that are attacking both sides stoking the hate.

      I'd say in order of the number of victims it'd be:
      1. Trolls playing both sides
      2. Victims of people who think #gg are idiots (Because they are largely fueled by hate and outrage, and there's nothing as vicious and dangerous as someone who thinks they're justified in correcting a social wrong)
      3. Victims of #gg, if any can be found.

      While the small number of people who claim to be 3 seem to get all the press, there seems to be a hell of a lot more 2.

    4. Re:Who? by Schadrach · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not really accurate. Mostly because you're pretending that #gg is doing all the threatening and doxxing.

      Even if we utterly "listen and believe" the folks who claim to have been threatened and then whip out their "donate to me to show how non-sexist you are" buttons that it's exactly as bad as they claim it is, you still have more people being threatened by anti-GG folks than by GG. Of course, many of those don't count because they have the wrong genitals to count as victims, and the rest don't count because women who don't agree with anti-GG folks aren't *really* women, such as https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Or to put it another way, no one in GG has sent filled syringes or dead animals to the anti-GG crowd, or called their employers to try to get them fired from jobs wholly unrelated to the topic at hand (this is actually a surprisingly common tactic from the SJW crowd when someone disagrees with them). The anti-GG crowd has done those things.

      Though I'll admit, asshole that he is, I still find it funny how many times Roguestar has been suspended from twitter.

      The only things anti-GG can claim against GG are people saying mean things over the internet, and a school shooting threat that both didn't claim to be related to GG (and let's face it, there are plenty of folks who hate Anita Sarkeesian in particular and feminist speakers in general who are wholly unconnected from GG), and was deemed not to be a credible threat by law enforcement.

    5. Re:Who? by Schadrach · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I, and most other pro-GG folks you'll find online will entirely agree with you that everyone that has engaged in threats and doxxing against anyone need to be tracked down and punished. I'm not worried, because I haven't done those things, nor have most other GG.

      I'd love to see some kind of evidence linking the USU threat to GG though, because the threat certainly didn't mention it, and a *lot* of people hate Sarkeesian that aren't part of GG. I know you want to make every time someone says something mean to a woman a case of GG being evil, but then you have all the women that are part of GG and also get harassed (and men, but I don't think you'd consider them important enough to care about as victims). Guess who's doing that harassment? Hint: It's not GG.

    6. Re:Who? by ganjadude · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Probably the frothing horde that sends out death threats and threatens to shoot up universities.

      as the OP said...which side?

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    7. Re:Who? by jedidiah · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Being a victim requires actual harm. What actual harm does a threat from some chickenshit web troll really do you?

      If anything, the so-called victims here are happily basking in the glow of the spotlight happy to be the center of attention.

      The real victims are people that have bought into all of this nonsense and have had the view of their own real world warped by it. There's the real psychological harm.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  2. Re:Sounds good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    I'd be willing to bet that all the threats were fabrications, but I'd also be willing to bet that having charges filed against said fabrications would do a world of good.

    At some point, someone, somewhere, somehow, for some reason will actually carry out such a threat and then everyone will be in a world of hurt. Its better if one or more of these provokers have the book thrown at them as an example to the others before that happens. The online culture of flooding death threats, personal harassment and defamation has gotten so out of control, the old adage of "just ignore it" literally does not work anymore.

  3. Re:Ethics? by epyT-R · · Score: 1, Insightful

    They weren't. A few women were criticized for their low quality argumentation and/or poor ethics and behavior, however.

    There's a big difference to a general attack on women because of their sex and criticisms towards specific women for their actions, which the anti-gamergate side refuses to acknowledge. The former may or may not be misogyny (depends on the motive for the generalization), the latter certainly is not. The rest of it boils down to long term corruption in the media, from supposedly game focused, gawker-owned rags spending too much time on 'social justice' and attacking their readerbase, to the obvious bias in the mainstream media coverage (not that the mainstream media has ever really gotten gaming). Whenever a group becomes this large and amorphous, there are bound to be a few crackpots in the mix (and the feminists are quick to trot this excuse out when one of their group gets a little too blatantly misandric for the good of the their image) who say stupid shit. These comments really shouldn't be taken seriously, but today's media loves to drum up the fear angle by implying that those crackpots make up the majority position and people fall for it. Law enforcement loves it because it gives them justification to demand larger budgets and more unchecked power.

  4. Re:cowardice by Microlith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So in other words, IT'S A CONSPIRACY!

    I hope this because I know damn well GamerGate did not make these threats.

    Given that there's nothing resembling membership rolls or a roster for gamergate, much like occupy and anonymous, anyone can claim they're part of gamergate and say whatever they want. And given that the birth cries of gamergate were basically textbook misogyny and harassment, it's pretty much impossible to separate the two.

    The entire case against GamerGate is built of press pushing talking points off of empty claims made by professional victims.

    Has it? So what's more believable:

    It's a giant conspiracy by media types to set up false harassment fronts against professional victims to make gamergate look bad.

    or

    Gamergate was full of assholes who continue to act like assholes and don't like it when their targets push back rather than simply accept being harassed into silence.

    By far one is much simpler, and hews much closer to the truth despite gamergate apologists denying and deflecting.

  5. Most Unbiased Slashdot Gamergate Article by Kunedog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Slashdot's coverage of Gamergate has been abysmal. Every other summary has followed the template "harassment, misogyny, threats, harassment, misogyny, threats . . . oh btw Gamergate."

    Sad as it is, this shitty summary is still the most "unbiased" simply because it straightforwardly mentions the movement as the topic of the discussion. The attempt to imply that the FBI said they were investigating pro-Gamergate people has already been destroyed in the comments (thank fuck users are still in control of the discussion here).

    Four months later, there still hasn't been a single /. thread about the Gamergate scandal itself: the journalistic lapses, the universal news media blackout and user forum/comment censorship (including reddit and 4chan of all places), and the still-ongoing coordinated smear campaign that was launched on August 28 with the "Gamers are Dead" shotgun blast of hit pieces. All of those milestones should have gotten at least one article here each.

    1. Re:Most Unbiased Slashdot Gamergate Article by Microlith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The attempt to imply that the FBI said they were investigating pro-Gamergate people has already been destroyed in the comments (thank fuck users are still in control of the discussion here).

      Destroyed in the comments? Mealy-mouthed arguments and claims of "false flag" (what the fuck is this, Infowars?) don't make a convincing argument.

      there still hasn't been a single /. thread about the Gamergate scandal itself

      Sure there has. Oh you mean the journalism aspect, which was never a relevant part and the actions of the gamergate horde ensured that out of the gate.

      Never mind that the journalism angle that sparked the whole thing was shown to be a bullshit basis to start.

      the universal news media blackout and user forum/comment censorship

      Universal? Not really. It's been observed for the horrible harassment campaign it's shown itself to be (omg false flag, false flag!) And people have been basically scrubbing forums of this stuff because it tends to be a drag and largely unproductive.

      the still-ongoing coordinated smear campaign that was launched on August 28 with the "Gamers are Dead" shotgun blast of hit pieces.

      Yeah, yeah, giant conspiracy. Not a reaction to the torrent of abusive behavior that erupted from the gaming world once they realized there was a much wider, and diverse audience for games than their narrow worldview let them conceive of.

      But please, keep banking on the misbegotten persecution complex.

    2. Re:Most Unbiased Slashdot Gamergate Article by DogDude · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's because none of that little shit matters. Nobody really cares about a bunch of guys who live in their parents' basements arguing about video games. People do care when a bunch of people threaten other people with bodily harm.

      Get some perspective, moron.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    3. Re:Most Unbiased Slashdot Gamergate Article by Brulath · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why do you feel like "Gamergate" is worthy of additional mainstream news coverage? Mainstream news is an entertainment product more than anything else, and few people who watch / read it religiously are likely to be both heavily involved in gaming and passionate about the range of issues Gamergate purports to cover. It makes sense that it's more of a footnote or focuses more on the side that's likely to be of interest to a wider audience.

      Discussions of the Gamergate issue haven't proven productive in any venue thus far, as they're often dominated by mistruths, irrelevant information, lies, and harassment. I usually avoid voluntarily exposing myself to it because I have no way of determining who is being truthful without significant investigation, and I frankly don't care enough to spend the time looking into the various claims; I suspect that's true of many people.

      Let's be a bit more frank here, the movement has something in common with religion: its goals are so vague that the people who are trying to do 'good' and improve things are sheltering those who want to cause destruction. There is a significant vocal minority who are using the shield of the many moderates to justify their extremist tactics, which seem to revolve around harassment campaigns. When this happens to your movement you can either try to correct it or disassociate yourself from it and re-form in a more focused group. I suggest the latter is more likely to work at this point, it seems like it would be quite hard to drown out the vitriol I've seen without even trying to look for it.

      You should really look into dropping Gamergate entirely, to divest yourself of its now relatively toxic branding, and creating several focused movements to replace it.

    4. Re:Most Unbiased Slashdot Gamergate Article by sinij · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I personally believe that this issue is worthwhile of further attention. Why? Because as a gamer that does not associate with GG, I still don't care to have gaming turned into radfem 'mandatory inclusion' platform.

      If you thought Jack Thompson was bad, read up on what radfem thinks about boys and gun play. If they have their way with gaming, next BG of CoD will have pink waffle bats and dolls instead of guns.

    5. Re:Most Unbiased Slashdot Gamergate Article by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you troll all of your customers, don't be surprised if you end up with a few wing nuts going off the deep end.

      The "journalism" response to this entire affair has been shameless pandering to some notion of political correctness and shameless exploitation of the situation. That's been true pretty much across the entire media spectrum starting with the very first set of trolling click-bait articles generated by the gaming and tech press.

      Anyone that disagrees is branded as some sort of anti-feminist misogynistic scum who's opinions don't matter.

      It's a perfect example of the "liberal media" that tea baggers like to whine about. The dogma behind the narrative is more important than anything else.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  6. Re:Ethics? by epyT-R · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ..and yet here you are, posting anyway. Thing is, the tempest entered the teapot from outside. Games are just one of the newer fronts on a much larger, ongoing cultural conflict.

  7. Re:Excellent! by epyT-R · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Large amorphous groups like gamergate (and yes, feminist groups and organizations as well) all have a few crackpots making threats. I am sure a few will be found, but that does not alter the legitimacy of the arguments made. I wouldn't be so quick to believe what three letter agencies put out either, especially since they are beholden to political bodies with interests in specific outcomes for the sake of image.

  8. Re:"gate" by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hope not, it's been a pretty good label to identify the importance of a "crisis". As soon as -gate is added, you know you can skip the story without missing anything worth your time.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  9. Media blackout by ArchieBunker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There is no media blackout because the media does not care. How could you even condense this whole shit show down into a one minute news story? Outside of the gaming community nobody really cares.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:Media blackout by Kunedog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I was referring to the initial week-long news blackout on gaming and tech sites (including Slashdot), most of which were specialized enough (and/or small enough) to care. But you couldn't find a single article about the corruption anywhere, until the pressure of the customer revolt built and the blackout ended in the Aug 28 gaming press tantrum. If the Streisand Effect had a Richter scale, the Gamergate scandal was at least a 9.5.

    2. Re:Media blackout by silentcoder · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That is because the "corruption" never happened, there is no evidence that it ever happened - on the other hand, the death threats and harassment was very, very real.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    3. Re:Media blackout by DrGamez · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This malaise is the problem.

      One side is saying "women get treated like shit in video games, this has to stop".

      The other side is sending death threats and harassing the family members of these women.

      The reason you don't care (and the reason you still felt you needed to comment TELLING us you don't care) is because you're lucky enough to have the luxury and privilege to ignore these stories. For the women and people of color who are being constantly assaulted because they had the nerve to say "hey this culture sucks for us," do not have this luxury.

  10. Re:Ethics? by dave420 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Calling something "social justice" does not immediately relegate it to obscurity. "Social justice" is just a term to mean "admit less-than-stellar behavior towards minorities or the underrepresented, and earnestly try to improve it". Unless you'd call Rosa Parks a SJW you really should stop trying to use terms like that pejoratively - it makes you look like a tiny-minded, scared child, who is worried their favorite toys aren't as awesome as they always thought, and lashes out at anyone who might point that out to them.

  11. Re:Ethics? by gweihir · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Excellent summary. What it boils down to is that some people were criticized, and they defended themselves by claiming these were attacks on their gender. The reason is plain and simple: They could not credibly defend themselves against the criticism itself, so they used misdirection and made it a gender-issue. Predictably, a lot of people with no clue whatsoever about what was going on then jumped on those criticizing, as apparently criticizing a person of female gender is an attack on them all...

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  12. Re:Ethics? by dave420 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    epyT-R, I also seem to remember you making many utterly misogynistic posts in the past, such as "women shouldn't/can't be scientists" and so on, so it's not really surprising that you'd be complaining about people calling other people out for being narrow-minded and intellectually lazy. When you're being socially unjust, I guess people looking for social justice are your enemy, hence your tirades against them.

  13. Re:cowardice by silentcoder · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Aaww you actually think calling somebody an SJW is an insult.

    Being an SJW is pretty much the plot of every good action movie or series ever made. The A-Team were SJW's, MacGuyver was an SJW... dude, being an SJW is the ultimate real-man thing to do !

    --
    Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  14. Inside MY Gaming community... by Grog6 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    No one cares either.

    Some Media Whores got some attention. BFD.

    The game we play didn't come out this year, in some cases, this millennium.

    I guess someone, somewhere, cares about these "Journalists" enough to send death threats; I can't possibly see why.

    New games are horribly crippled compared to the past; It would be nice to see a new shooter without micropayments, and including a level editor.

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
  15. Re:Ethics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ALL OF THIS.

    This is exactly why Gamergate exploded in numbers.

    It all started out attacking some awful excuse for a game on Steam that attempted to be deep and meaningful, but ended up being awful.
    Then, the developer cried "sexism!" and played the victim card SO HARD.
    Then friendships were found between a few reviewers and her, which caused an even larger shitstorm.
    Then the rest of the bullshit happened, fake relationships, fake harassment, fake death threats, fake screenshots attacking and threatening to attack her (like those faked images from uh, wizardchan or whatever it was, OBVIOUSLY forgetting archivers exist) and so on.
    The claims that only white fat virgins were pro-gamergate, shot down, and then them saying images were faked, how people were PAID and so on. YES, SERIOUSLY. PAID. This is how far these morons will go in order to try squash any criticism against them.
    OH, let's not forget where she publicly attacked a charity to get more female developers in to games dev, that bit ALWAYS ends up forgotten.
    I sat and watched that crap as it was happening, her and her group of friends all gloating about their success on twitter during it all.

    The ONLY people that have genuinely been harassed during this are all the people supporting gamergate, all by her and her group of "hacker" buddies doxxing everyone that even shows any negativity to her movement, or follows the people in question.
    People have been fired. People have been accused of rape. People have had massive amounts of shit sent to their houses that they never wanted, I'm sure some people even got swatted.
    People against GG that were in positions of power elsewhere, such as game jams, were threatening to give all games by male teams bad reviews, RIGHT ON TWITTER, then came that delusional terrible programmer that wrote the blocklist for twitter and got trolled by allowing a troll himself on the whitelist! And who did that block? Oh yes, literally anyone that followed anyone relating to GG, or mentioned GG, so, loads of people that had nothing to do with it, because "gotta silence everyone!", you know, because censoring things on your computer means NOBODY ELSE IN THE ENTIRE WORLD CAN SEE IT. (this is the sort of people we are dealing with here)

    I seriously do hope the FBI find those fake threats and the few possibly real threads that seem to be coming from a guy in Brazil. (probably a botnet node)
    This shit really needs to be dealt with already since the only people suffering are gamers.
    These people aren't gamers, Anita couldn't even mention a single game in an interview when she done an entire piece on game sexism. How pathetic. (not to mention every single one of her points were destroyed many times over)

    But of course, let's not forget, this is just attacking females.
    All those females that are actually guys employed at many news sites, or post on twitter. I can literally name 4 females in gamergate and the rest are guys that are hitting double digits now. Soggy knees indeed.

  16. Re:Ethics? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I notice that all your links are to poorly made YouTube videos. Taking the first one, the links you claim back you up are actually just links to more YouTube videos, a document on Google Docs that is unverifiable, a seemingly unrelated WaPo editorial about a spat between journalists and bloggers, and a Gamasutra article that they clearly state was written by community member and not their own staff and which seems to be mostly irrelevant.

    Your claims are built entirely on top of other unfounded claims and extremely weak evidence. That basically sums up the entire GamerGate movement, from the original lies about Zoe Quinn onwards. There are some genuine issues with games journalism, although why that surprises anyone I don't know because no aspect of entertainment journalism has much credibility, but those points are lost in a sea of bullshit now.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC