Slashdot Mirror


Amazon "Suppresses" Book With Too Many Hyphens

An anonymous reader writes Author Graeme Reynolds found his novel withdrawn from Amazon because of excessive use of hyphens. He received an email from Amazon about his werewolf novel, High Moor 2: Moonstruck, because a reader had complained that there were too many hyphens. "When they ran an automated spell check against the manuscript they found that over 100 words in the 90,000-word novel contained that dreaded little line," he says. "This, apparently 'significantly impacts the readability of your book' and, as a result, 'We have suppressed the book because of the combined impact to customers.'"

292 comments

  1. from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dept. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 4, Funny

    You-should-ask-slashdot-to-publish-the-book-they-LIKE-hyphens.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  2. f-o-x-t-r-o-t-u-n-i-f-o-r-m-c-h-a-r-l-i-e-k-i-l-o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    f-o-x-t-r-o-t-u-n-i-f-o-r-m-c-h-a-r-l-i-e-k-i-l-o-y-o-u-a-m-a-z-o-n

  3. LOL ... w00t? by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, Amazon is now the grammar police?

    I'm sure there are hundreds (if not thousands) of books on Amazon which have absolutely shit grammar and punctuation.

    To quote the author of the book ... what the actual fuck?

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:LOL ... w00t? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FTFY:

      To quote the author of the book ... what-the actual-fuck?

    2. Re:LOL ... w00t? by ma++i+ude · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, it looks like Amazon is the typography police. For whatever reason, the book seems to use en-dashes instead of hyphens (check the preview on Amazon). That is an abomination. Where the message changed from "please replace en-dashes with hyphens" to "don't use hyphens" is anyone's guess.

      --
      You can't shut us down! The Internet is about the free exchange and sale of other people's ideas!
    3. Re:LOL ... w00t? by Zocalo · · Score: 2

      Not with any consistency it seems. They are apparently fine with Ernest Vincent Wright's Gadsby which doesn't even include the letter "e" once in the main text (there's a nice bit of humour/irony in there being an ebook version though), with all the readabilty issues you might expect that to bring. The works of James Joyce also still seem to be listed, come to that, so I'm somewhat curious as to just how this "readability filter" get applied. I sure hope it's not just based on reader comments, because if it is a group like Anonymous or /b/ is about to have a book censoring field day.

      On the otherhand, if they can start with some of the religious dogma out there...

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    4. Re:LOL ... w00t? by ma++i+ude · · Score: 5, Informative

      Addendum: It turns out the author used the minus sign instead of the hyphen. That (a) looks wrong on the page, (b) breaks screen readers, (c) confuses readability scores and (d) makes this not news.

      --
      You can't shut us down! The Internet is about the free exchange and sale of other people's ideas!
    5. Re:LOL ... w00t? by Sperbels · · Score: 3, Informative
      I always thought the en-dash and hyphen were the same thing and the em-dash was the long one. Apparently there's hyphen, en-dash, and em-dash and the text of the book does indeed use the en-dash...and looks a little weird.

      Fangs burst through her gums as her jaw elongated into a razor–filled [razor-filled] muzzle and her ears elongated. After less than thirty seconds, the woman had been replaced by sleek, muscular, brown–furred [brown-furred] monster.

    6. Re:LOL ... w00t? by jez9999 · · Score: 0

      So, on a standard US keyboard, is this sign a minus or a hyphen?: -

    7. Re:LOL ... w00t? by gnupun · · Score: 3, Informative

      An en-dash is much longer than a hyphen.

    8. Re:LOL ... w00t? by ma++i+ude · · Score: 4, Informative

      So, on a standard US keyboard, is this sign a minus or a hyphen?: -

      It's a hyphen. A standard keyboard layout has no minus sign, not even in the keypad. The author of the book explicitly specified a Unicode minus sign wherever a hyphen should've been because "I try to avoid using direct ascii hash codes because some ereaders can misinterpret them"

      --
      You can't shut us down! The Internet is about the free exchange and sale of other people's ideas!
    9. Re:LOL ... w00t? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hyphen.

      As well:

      — is an em-dash
      – is an en-dash
        is a minus, which you cannot see in Slashdot...

    10. Re:LOL ... w00t? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      A standard keyboard layout has no minus sign, not even in the keypad.

      That is very arguable. In fact it's just wrong. The key is a "minus" key, labelled with a "minus" sign, and in Windows at least it produces a scan code the constant for which is VK_SUBTRACT. What may ultimately be rendered in various text-entry contexts as a result of pressing that key may or may not be a minus sign, but the key is most definitely a minus key with a minus sign on it.

    11. Re:LOL ... w00t? by zippthorne · · Score: 2

      In his blog, there are a number of comments about the HTML entity he used instead of the hyphen character. There is speculation that text-to-speech accessibility features were mis-interpreting things as a result.

      On the TTS note, It seems like HTML (or at least the dialect used for ebooks, but why not everywhere?) should have a tag for providing pronunciation overrides, which would improve accessibility and finally allow us to know how the authors intended the pronunciation of all those apostrophe'd names.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    12. Re:LOL ... w00t? by Pope+Hagbard · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's so not-news that it was debunked on Reddit and other places a week ago.

      Slashdot's given up on news for nerds, and it's giving up on stuff that matters.

    13. Re:LOL ... w00t? by ma++i+ude · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You're probably right. As soon as I hit 'Submit' I regretted having used the term 'sign'. It's better to distinguish between keycaps, scancodes, character codes and glyphs.

      --
      You can't shut us down! The Internet is about the free exchange and sale of other people's ideas!
    14. Re:LOL ... w00t? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Addendum: It turns out the author used the minus sign instead of the hyphen. That (a) looks wrong on the page, (b) breaks screen readers, (c) confuses readability scores and (d) makes this not news.

      Ah. What's news then, is that Amazon can't deploy a simple perl script to fix common typography errors such as these. YouTube wants more content creators so it deploys helpers like 'auto-stabilize' and such. Amazon, in contrast, prefers to castigate its contributors for typography errors. Who benefits? Copyeditors.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    15. Re:LOL ... w00t? by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      It turns out the author used the minus sign instead of the hyphen.

      Hint: probably 99% of all ebooks on Amazon use a minus sign instead of a hyphen, because the hyphen doesn't exist on most (all?) keyboards.

    16. Re:LOL ... w00t? by ma++i+ude · · Score: 1

      I am not aware of any word processor that would insert an actual minus glyph when the 'minus' key is pressed. In this instance, the author explicitly specified a minus codepoint.

      --
      You can't shut us down! The Internet is about the free exchange and sale of other people's ideas!
    17. Re:LOL ... w00t? by pla · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, on a standard US keyboard, is this sign a minus or a hyphen?: -

      Gonna piss off the typography police here, but...

      Yes. They mean the same damned thing, and don't give me any crap about one looking a little longer than the other. A hyphen is a dash is a minus sign is any mid-height horizontal line.

      Readability scores? Seriously? I will damned well use whatever character comes out when I press the key between "0" and "=" on my keyboard, and to hell with your broken automated readers that can't deal with the default character produced by 99.9% of keyboards in the English-speaking world.

    18. Re:LOL ... w00t? by Dishevel · · Score: 2

      Most people probably do not want Amazon to edit their books.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    19. Re:LOL ... w00t? by pthisis · · Score: 5, Informative

      Propose such a "simple" perl script.

      Here are some cases it should know how to deal with:

      Between numbers (note that slashdot eats some of these characters; the numbers below all have different dashes or related symbols between "555" and "1000"):
      "Pages 555–1000 discuss this matter" (this should be an internumeral dash, which is typically an en dash, U+2013).
      "Her phone number is 5551000" (this should be a figure dash, U+2012).
      "There were actually a lot more of them than the estimated 555—1000, to be precise" (this should be an em dash, U+2014).
      "The teacher asked me to solve 5551000. I told him negative 455 was the answer." (this should be a minus sign, U+2212)

      Between letters/words you have a similar problem: even if you know it shouldn't be a minus sign (which symbolic algebra makes tough to know for sure, but suppose you could surmount that), you generally have no idea what kind of dash or hyphen it should be turned into.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    20. Re:LOL ... w00t? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the author, Amazon did not specify what the problem was, leaving him to figure out for himself what was wrong.
      A simple e-mail, before pulling his book, that stated exactly what was the issue should have sufficed instead of this heavy-handed (smirk), unhelpful attempt.

    21. Re:LOL ... w00t? by plover · · Score: 2

      What's news then, is that Amazon can't deploy a simple perl script to fix common typography errors such as these.

      There is nothing simple about typography, and a script such as you describe would cause more damage than it would fix. Any editor has to fully understand English, to know which word is the right choice, to understand syntax and grammar, and to know when a writer is deliberately or playfully bending the rules.

      If you want to see what the state of the art in automated editing looks like, try using Word's grammar checker. If all of its advice is followed, it can make any interesting story read as blandly as an 8th grader's essay paper on the history of frogs.

      --
      John
    22. Re:LOL ... w00t? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Ah. What's news then, is that Amazon can't deploy a simple perl script to fix common typography errors such as these.

      Please don't encourage Amazon to do that. Deciding whether a particular editorial choice is correct or not programmatically is a lot more complex than deciding whether video is likely to be unstable, and programmatically fixing those mistakes correctly in a pile of inconsistent, semi-random text and markup is dramatically harder than applying an IS algorithm to video.

      In my experience, whenever Amazon attempts to "fix" content, it just causes more work for the 90% of content creators who know what we're doing, as we have to find ways to work around Amazon's ingestion scripts' brain damage. For example, if Amazon deployed a Perl script to "fix" this, then odds are good that mathematics texts would also get "fixed", and by "fixed", I of course mean broken.

      The best way for Amazon to handle this is to do almost exactly what they did: wait for someone to report a problem, examine the content to make sure the report isn't bogus, contact the content creator, and ask for a corrected edition. If the content creator responds by saying, "No, that's really what I meant," then let it go through. Anything else just gets in the way of everyone in a misguided attempt to help a small percentage of content submitters. And the number of people who are even capable of submitting a file with Unicode minus sign characters in place of hyphens is vanishingly small.

      With that said, Amazon should have looked at the content more carefully and pointed out the Unicode minus signs, rather than saying "too many hyphens", which is just absurd; the hyphen count described here seems low to me by a factor of three or four, not high.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    23. Re:LOL ... w00t? by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      There is nothing simple about typography, and a script such as you describe would cause more damage than it would fix.

      In this case, the script would be simple, since the book isn't about math. Replace all U+2212 characters with U+002D and you've fixed the problem that Amazon has with the book.

      Although U+2010 is called "Hyphen" and U+002D is called "Hyphen-Minus", either works in this case, with U+002D the most common.

    24. Re:LOL ... w00t? by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      Apparently there's hyphen, en-dash, and em-dash and the text of the book does indeed use the en-dash...and looks a little weird.

      There's actually a lot more than just those, some of which render identically in most fonts.

      I ran into a eBook that uses the n-dash correctly when used a a modifier for compound words, and it does look weird (which is what alerted me to it in the first place), but after reading the rules, I left them that way.

    25. Re:LOL ... w00t? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not with any consistency it seems. They are apparently fine with Ernest Vincent Wright's Gadsby which doesn't even include the letter "e" once in the main text (there's a nice bit of humour/irony in there being an ebook version though).

      Sort of, I'd call it a 'digital book', though, and prolong the humor.

    26. Re:LOL ... w00t? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Gonna piss off the typography police here, but...

      Yes. They mean the same damned thing, and don't give me any crap about one looking a little longer than the other. A hyphen is a dash is a minus sign is any mid-height horizontal line.

      It's not a matter of pissing anyone off. You're just wrong. The fact that you don't care that you're wrong is neither here nor there.

    27. Re:LOL ... w00t? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said they can't?

      Most probably they by policy don't edit submitted works. They don't want to get into the habit of changing an author's content, (down that road lies all sorts of bad PR) but refusing to sell something until the author edits it themselves is a different ball of wax.

    28. Re:LOL ... w00t? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, this makes no sense considering the Amazon Kindle environment.

      My guess is this has to be an advertising stunt, and the novel will shortly be back up for Kindle, or maybe a print publisher.

    29. Re:LOL ... w00t? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      What's news then, is that Amazon can't deploy a simple perl script to fix common typography errors such as these.

      There's no such thing. Every character has it's place, and a non intelligent script is most certainly going to get some wrong. It's going to replace some perfectly placed characters with some incorrect ones. And an author with a 100% correct book would be justifiably angry if Amazon changed it.

      No script can replace a human editor. Not yet anyway.

    30. Re:LOL ... w00t? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It probably goes like this:

      1. Did X or more customers who bought the book complain?
      (yes): proceed to 2.
      (no): proceed to 3
      2: Is it on the ignore list (includes widely recognized "classics")?
      (yes): proceed to 3
      (no) proceed to 4
      3: Ignore complaints
      4: Flag it for someone to look at internally and make the call on whether to remove it from the store or add it to the ignore list.

    31. Re:LOL ... w00t? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In this case it sounds like he used the HTML entity for minus, which looked just fine, but when people with visions problems used screen readers it would read (not a real line for the book):

      "The monkey minus man climbed the tower" or "The all minus too minus common problem with being dead was that you were dead."

    32. Re:LOL ... w00t? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      Someone on Reddit pointed out that the author may be using the wrong character.

      Are we certain—certain—that this is about the use of hyphenated words, and not the misuse of hyphen (-), en-dash (–), and em-dash (—) characters? Like, the way an en-dash is used where an em-dash should be used three times in this paragraph:

    33. Re:LOL ... w00t? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your em dash example is completely wrong. En dashes are used for number ranges, as your page example shows.

    34. Re:LOL ... w00t? by plover · · Score: 1

      The screen readers for the blind emit nonsense words when fed typographically incorrect input. Be glad you're not blind, and don't have to deal with them.

      And that character on your keyboard, above the equals sign? It's the right one to use, but the author didn't use it. Instead, he made 100 typos using the wrong symbol.

      --
      John
    35. Re:LOL ... w00t? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, I love typography, but the confusion over this all indicates to me that people don't perceive the differences between those characters. Maybe between a longer line and a shorter line--an en dash and an em dash, but that's it. The rest is just icing. You don't need a separate minus sign and figure dash.

    36. Re:LOL ... w00t? by GTRacer · · Score: 1

      [...] Every character has it's place [...]

      All too easy...

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    37. Re:LOL ... w00t? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > And that character on your keyboard above the equals sign

      You mean F10? An odd stand-in for a minus sign...

    38. Re:LOL ... w00t? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      As I'm dyslexic, if that's all you found, then I'm doing well. I didn't said I was an editor.

    39. Re:LOL ... w00t? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Neither. That is a hyphen-minus character (hex code 002d).

      If you look closely at the two horizontal line keys on your keyboard, the one on the numeric keypad is probably shorter than the one on the left. It's possible that other software keyboard layouts will interpret these two keys differently, but in the standard US English keyboard layout they both give you a hyphen-minus.

      I'm guessing the hyphen-minus became commonly used as a compromise for simplicity. This is what is used almost everywhere for both of these characters and most people are unaware that hyphen and minus are two different things. In fact, whenever something you are typing will be interpreted by a machine (programming code, telephone number form fields, etc.), use the standard hyphen-minus. Barely any software is programmed to recognize anything else.

      I can't show you any of the proper characters here because Slashdot seems to break anything outside of the old ASCII character set. I can tell you about them though.

      The hyphen is hex code 2010. It is shorter than a hyphen-minus (depending on the font). Use this to separate hyphenated words like wind-up.

      The minus sign is hex code 2212. It is longer than a hyphenÃminus. Use this in mathematical formulas.

      The other common, similar characters are the EN dash and the EM dash. These are both longer than a hypen or minus sign.

      You can find a full list of these by searching a unicode character table for hyphen, minus and dash.

      You may also not be aware that your keyboard does not output proper left and right quotes and that the letter x and the multiplication sign are two different things.

    40. Re:LOL ... w00t? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the difference is almost irrelevant for simple reading, but in some cases the specific character is very important. E.g., does "1-5" indicate subtraction or a range of numbers?

      For eBooks, the regular "minus" key on the keyboard is a hyphen. Getting a dash or a subtraction symbol requires a different Unicode character.

      You run into problems when some idiotic text editors replace characters automatically. Or when writers do not understand how their tools work, depending on where you want to place the blame.

    41. Re:LOL ... w00t? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Books are copyrighted. Amazon cannot edit them without permission of the rights-holder. Given their increasingly abusive monopoly behavior, I would be loathe to accept anything of the sort.

    42. Re:LOL ... w00t? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is very important in any text that uses math. Negative numbers, subtraction, ranges, and "grammar" dashes all need to be visibly distinct.

      For basic text, yes, a short dash to indicate conjunction and a long dash to indicate disjunction are probably sufficient.

    43. Re:LOL ... w00t? by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      Yup, but the publisher has to work on one step more of precision and/or abstraction than the reader. The reader consumes his material in one way, but the publisher has to make sure that multiple readers can consume in different ways, and therefore must make a technically correct product.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    44. Re:LOL ... w00t? by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's unlikely to be a dyslexia-caused error. Dyslexia is a problem in sound processing/distinction, and its and it's sound exactly the same. It's just a plain old spelling error, and even English teachers do it regularly when typing....

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    45. Re:LOL ... w00t? by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      Indeed -- en-dash is nominally as long as a lower case "n" is wide, hence the name. Can you guess what an em-dash is...? Nominally, I say, because modern typefaces normally have em-dashes that are as long as en-dashes, when "m" isn't twice as wide as "n"...

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    46. Re:LOL ... w00t? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that's an example of the guy's writing, I can see why he needs all the free advertising he can get. Sure, let's talk about the typography, the writer/publisher relationship, Amazon's "monopoly" - anything to divert attention from the prose.

    47. Re:LOL ... w00t? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah, in this case. But Amazon doesn't generally make it a point to edit books for people. The assumption is that the Kindle MOBI file isn't the original source content, so if Amazon were to monkey with the MOBI data, their changes would just get stomped on the next time the author fixes anything. For Amazon to fix this in a way that would have any permanence, they'd have to add that script as part of kindlegen, and then it would break millions of other books. Better for them to ask the author to fix his or her source content and rebuild the derived MOBI.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    48. Re:LOL ... w00t? by qzzpjs · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's called Microsoft Word. If you don't turn it off, it converts every minus sign you press into a Unicode character. It's a nightmare when you're writing documentation and people try to copy and paste commands from your document and they all fail.

    49. Re:LOL ... w00t? by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      This is actually good compared to most self published work.

    50. Re:LOL ... w00t? by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Propose such a "simple" perl script.

      Here are some cases it should know how to deal with:

      Between numbers (note that slashdot eats some of these characters; the numbers below all have different dashes or related symbols between "555" and "1000"): "Pages 555–1000 discuss this matter" (this should be an internumeral dash, which is typically an en dash, U+2013). "Her phone number is 5551000" (this should be a figure dash, U+2012). "There were actually a lot more of them than the estimated 555—1000, to be precise" (this should be an em dash, U+2014). "The teacher asked me to solve 5551000. I told him negative 455 was the answer." (this should be a minus sign, U+2212)

      Between letters/words you have a similar problem: even if you know it shouldn't be a minus sign (which symbolic algebra makes tough to know for sure, but suppose you could surmount that), you generally have no idea what kind of dash or hyphen it should be turned into.

      I say they're all - and I say to hell with them all.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    51. Re:LOL ... w00t? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The key is a "minus" key, labelled with a "minus" sign,

      Mine is an underscore, lined up poorly. On the same key as the underscore.

    52. Re:LOL ... w00t? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      If you look closely at the two horizontal line keys on your keyboard, the one on the numeric keypad is probably shorter than the one on the left.

      They are the same on the keyboard. When printed out in variable-width fonts, they are the same. There are no keys on the keyboard that give different length horizontal lines (other than the underscore is longer than the dash-minus, but not confusable).

    53. Re:LOL ... w00t? by GTRacer · · Score: 1

      Heehee - I wasn't intending to hold you to editorial standards. It was merely the combination of the "hyphen-gate" discussion plus your extra apostrophe that got me.

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
  4. If readability was a crime... by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...there would be no Slashdot summaries.

    1. Re:If readability was a crime... by koan · · Score: 1

      Zing!!!

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    2. Re:If readability was a crime... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If readability WERE a crime...

    3. Re:If readability was a crime... by amalcolm · · Score: 2

      The subjunctive is alive and living on Slashdot!!

      --
      Time for bed, said Zebedee - boing
    4. Re:If readability was a crime... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If POOR readability were a crime...

    5. Re:If readability was a crime... by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      The only way to kill a zombie subjunctive is a sharp blow to the head verb...

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  5. Link to the source by OzPeter · · Score: 4, Informative

    At least link to the actual story, rather than the discussion of the story.

    Hyphen Hate? When Amazon went to war against punctuation.

    Jeez. That was in the second paragraph of TFA.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:Link to the source by Solandri · · Score: 4, Informative

      Thanks. Here's the rather important last line od the author's blog you linked:

      "UPDATE: The book is now back on sale. Common sense seems to have prevailed "

    2. Re:Link to the source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks. Here's the rather important last line od the author's blog you linked:

      "UPDATE: The book is now back on sale. Common sense seems to have prevailed "

      That's no longer the last entry. We need to read the entire blog to find out what this was really about. He needed to re-edit the book and replace all the offending minus signs in the book with hyphens. He did, and that's why it's back on sale.

      Also, as Graeme pointed out, the real problem with this situation isn't the punctuation.
      The real problem is that they took his book down based on a single complaint. That's just plain unfair and suggests the possibility of books being taken down for reasons that are matters of opinion about the content of the book.
      And, as it turns out, the complaint was incorrect. This hurt his income in a way that was basically unjustified.

    3. Re:Link to the source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the complaint was correct. I do agree one complaint should not pull a book from the store but it was a useful education to the author to fix his books.

    4. Re:Link to the source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fantastic! Now I can get back to not buying it.

    5. Re:Link to the source by T.E.D. · · Score: 1
      ...and a bit later there was this bit, which is probably appropo for those of us jumping in 5 days later:

      I thought I’d pretty much finished with this thread, but I really feel I have to make one more comment before I sign off.

      A ridiculous number of people have gotten caught up in the whole “he used a minus sign instead of an ascii hyphen! The bastard” controversy that has followed this thread around and has spilled over into any number of internet message boards. First of all, let me be clear. The issue was not with my use of a minus sign. The issue Amazon had was that someone had complained about hyphenation. Second, I have since gone back and checked the original file on the Kindle text-to-speech app and it renders fine. No issues. Third – to those people who love to nit pick and find a tiny issue then blow it up out of all proportion – that was not what the blog post was about. The blog post was a rant that I never expected more than a hundred or so people to see about how Amazon took a book down on the basis of a single complaint. But really, you people need to get a fucking life. More important things have happened over the last week. Go get upset over the nutter who killed those people in that Australian cafe. Get angry at the continuing erosion of your civil rights. In the grand scheme of things, minus over hyphen is probably not worth that much of your time. Have a very happy Christmas. Graeme

    6. Re:Link to the source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grammatically, he used the wrong symbol. Now he is using the right symbol, which is an improvement.

      We could argue whether Amazon ought to have any role in influencing the content of its wares, but the complaint was substantive (if poorly worded).

    7. Re:Link to the source by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      If the complaint was from a screen-reader user, Amazon were obliged to act under disability/accessibility legislation.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    8. Re: Link to the source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reading that shows that the author likes to use hyphens where he wants dashesâ"and neither is appropriate. (In general, either a comma or a colon would be better.)

    9. Re:Link to the source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Istartedto buttheobsceneamountof spacesinhisblogposttext turnedmeoffreading completlysoIblockedhissite.

  6. huh? by Frisky070802 · · Score: 1

    How would that fraction even be deemed significant?

    --
    Mencken had it right. So glad that's old news.
  7. About time Amazon cracked down on this by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Funny

    I also think it's about time they take down down on Mozart's "The Marriage of Figaro" from their mp3 store until someone can do something about the number of notes.

    1. Re:About time Amazon cracked down on this by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 3

      Which notes did you have in mind?

    2. Re:About time Amazon cracked down on this by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      LMOL....

    3. Re:About time Amazon cracked down on this by mrbester · · Score: 1

      While they're at it, they can censor all the extra notes that Chopin liked to torture pianists with. 57 notes in a 3/4 bar is just too many. The man's a menace.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    4. Re:About time Amazon cracked down on this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our algorithm has determined that there are too many C's. Our research has shown that being buried in C's--especially high-C's--will adversely affect the listeners ability to breathe. It is for this reason that we must remove the complete works of Wolf Motzart from our online store.

    5. Re:About time Amazon cracked down on this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also think it's about time they take down down on Mozart's "The Marriage of Figaro" from their mp3 store until someone can do something about the number of notes.

      Rabbit of Seville

      How do?
      Welcome to my shop
      Let me cut your mop
      Let me shave your crop
      Daintily, daintily...

      Hey, you!
      Don't look so perplexed
      Why must you be vexed?
      Can't you see you're next?
      Yes, you're next, you're so next!

      How about a nice, close shave?
      Teach your whiskers to behave.
      Lots of lather, lots of soap.
      Please hold still, don't be a dope.
      Now we're ready for the scraping.
      There's no use to try escaping.
      Yell and scream and rant and rave.
      It's no use, you need a shave!

      Ooh! Ouch! Ouch! Ow! Ooh! Ooh! Ouch!

      There, you're nice and clean
      Although your face looks like it might have gone through a ma-chine.

    6. Re:About time Amazon cracked down on this by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      Actually, given that the Overture is in D major and a major passage is in A major, the Marriage of Figaro is relatively light on Cs. It's probably a bit overburdened with As though....

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    7. Re:About time Amazon cracked down on this by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      Well he did say they used an algorithm to make this determination. Apparently it's not a very good one.

    8. Re:About time Amazon cracked down on this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On Slashdot we dislike C#. Replace them all with D-flats.

  8. What a horrible first world problem by smooth+wombat · · Score: 0, Troll

    "Your book, that I downloaded in digital format rather than the bulky dead wood format, is unreadable as I sit on the subway/bus on my way to work. This is an outrage!"

    Apparently the person(s) who complained have such perfect lives and no other issues to worry about, they had to find something to complain about.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:What a horrible first world problem by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      If we always had to wait until the biggest problems are fixed before fixing the little ones, we would never fix anything.

    2. Re:What a horrible first world problem by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Mistaking something you don't care for (too many hyphens) as a problem doesn't make it a problem.

    3. Re:What a horrible first world problem by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      The guy cared enough to complain to Amazon, so it was a problem for him.

    4. Re:What a horrible first world problem by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

      And "The Interview" was a problem for Kim (North Korea, not Kardashian) so what? The problem with listening to every whiner is that they get too much power in the process, and normal people start being impacted by all the various "rules" the whiners come up with that serve no purpose other than to annoy everyone else.

      Hey, I just described political correctness :-D

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    5. Re:What a horrible first world problem by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      From what I understood, the problem was that the hyphens were not the proper character so while one guy complained it probably affected a lot of readers too, especially blind readers who use text-to-speech. What's an annoyance for us might turn into a book that's nearly impossible to read for them.

    6. Re:What a horrible first world problem by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      "Too many" is not "wrong kind"

      We should be able to articulate what we intended much better than was done here, especially those people criticizing literature and editing skills. If this was a formatting error (as was indicated) then that was the problem, the letter should have indicated it. And since it was a formatting problem, it was easy to fix, as was proven in this matter.

      There was no need to remove the book, and a human (not an automated response) could (and should) have politely asked for a correction. Amazon simply came across as a boor.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  9. Trigger warning! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hyphens! Book too dashing! Hyphens! Warning!

  10. Why hyphenation in an e-text? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't the dam-ned text get re-flowed by the devi-ce or so-mething? That be-ing said, this is ridi-culous, all my prin-ted books have a few hy-phens, and I've ne-ver had any dif-ficulty rea-ding them. Maybe Ama-zon should just add "don't hyphenate" setting on their reading device and end it once and for all?

    1. Re:Why hyphenation in an e-text? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Doesn't the dam-ned text get re-flowed by the devi-ce or so-mething? That be-ing said, this is ridi-culous, all my prin-ted books have a few hy-phens, and I've ne-ver had any dif-ficulty rea-ding them. Maybe Ama-zon should just add "don't hyphenate" setting on their reading device and end it once and for all?

      There is a unicode character known as a soft hyphen. The soft hyphen indicates where to break a word if it doesn't all fit on a line. This character should be used instead of a hard hyphen most of the time.

    2. Re:Why hyphenation in an e-text? by lgw · · Score: 5, Funny

      There is a unicode character known as a soft hyphen.

      Hey, this is Slashdot: we don't know about Unicode and we like it that way!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re:Why hyphenation in an e-text? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      There is a unicode character known as a soft hyphen. The soft hyphen indicates where to break a word if it doesn't all fit on a line. This character should be used instead of a hard hyphen most of the time.

      Too bad eBook readers are very inconsistent in their support for that. Some readers display an icon indicating an unknown glyph, many fail to insert the hyphen....

      IMO, the best you can do is trust the reader's automatic hyphenation and hope for the best. To do so, in your stylesheet, add:

      hyphens: auto;
      -webkit-hyphens: auto;
      -moz-hyphens: auto;
      -o-hyphens: auto;

      And set these to "manual" if you need to prevent hyphenation in certain spots (e.g. headings).

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    4. Re:Why hyphenation in an e-text? by ThePhilips · · Score: 2

      There is a unicode character known as a soft hyphen. The soft hyphen indicates where to break a word if it doesn't all fit on a line. This character should be used instead of a hard hyphen most of the time.

      Too bad eBook readers are very inconsistent in their support for that. Some readers display an icon indicating an unknown glyph, many fail to insert the hyphen....

      Alas.

      That soft hyphen would have been a blessing for the German e-books. Some texts are flush with the overly long words, making them very hard to read.

      But Kindle (last time I checked) doesn't support it.

      Neither the Calibre and few other e-book viewers/editors I have tried in the past.

      In other words, in my experience the support is uniform and consistent: no support whatsoever, sadly.

      P.S. On top of it, the Kindle devices I have, also have the rendering and text selection bugs when displaying/selecting the text around words (even if they are hyphenated) which are longer than the single visible line.

      --
      All hope abandon ye who enter here.
    5. Re:Why hyphenation in an e-text? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      There is a unicode character known as a soft hyphen.

      Hey, this is Slashdot: we don't know about Unicode and we like it that way!

      What's unicode in ASCII?

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    6. Re:Why hyphenation in an e-text? by macs4all · · Score: 2

      Doesn't the dam-ned text get re-flowed by the devi-ce or so-mething? That be-ing said, this is ridi-culous, all my prin-ted books have a few hy-phens, and I've ne-ver had any dif-ficulty rea-ding them. Maybe Ama-zon should just add "don't hyphenate" setting on their reading device and end it once and for all?

      The real question is, did he "hard-hyphen" the words, such that they wouldn't re-flow correctly; or did he just have lots of compound-adjectives, etc. that would actually call for hyphenation?

    7. Re:Why hyphenation in an e-text? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to my mother-in-law, famous editor-in-chief Mary Smith-Williams, hyphens have other uses besides breaking words at the end of a line.

    8. Re:Why hyphenation in an e-text? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were all compound-adjectives and all correct in British English

    9. Re:Why hyphenation in an e-text? by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, Nook is the only e-reader to support hyphenation. There may be one or two other readers with newer versions of the RMSDK that also support it, but I don't know of any offhand.

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
    10. Re:Why hyphenation in an e-text? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Auto-hyphenation is built into WebKit, so unless they took steps to deliberately break it, it should work in all readers based on WebKit. To my knowledge:

      • iBooks supports it (in iOS 6 and later, and all versions of OS X)
      • Kindle previewer supports it in all the KF8 modes which should mean newer Kindle readers support it unless somebody at Amazon screwed up pretty carelessly (e.g. by failing to copy the hyphenation dictionaries into the right places while building the firmware images).

      I was not aware of Nook supporting it. That's surprising, given that they're based on RMSDK. Hmm. Upon digging further, RMSDK egregiously violates the CSS specification by using "adobe" as a vendor prefix, then proceeds to also use the wrong CSS property name, resulting in the property "adobe-hyphenate" instead of "-adobe-hyphens" as it should be, with values of "none", "explicit", and "auto" instead of "none", "manual", and "auto". Nice, job, Adobe.... [redacted swearing at what feels like the hundredth instance of Adobe flagrantly violating the CSS specification that I've run into personally]

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    11. Re:Why hyphenation in an e-text? by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for iBooks. But for Kindle if it's supported in Kindle Previewer, then someone screwed up pretty carelessly. Neither my Kindle Fire HD (first generation), Kindle Paperwhite (second generation), nor the Kindle app on iPhone support hyphenation in KF8 books.

      As for RMSDK: Agree about the vendor prefix. However, their property predates the hyphens property being officially specced out by several months; it's not terribly surprising that they don't match up quite right. (Plus, the default is "auto" instead of "manual".) Once they had the property, they were pretty much stuck with it for compatibility reasons.

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
    12. Re:Why hyphenation in an e-text? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Doesn't the dam-
      ned text get re-
      flowed by the devi-
      ce or so-
      mething? That be-
      ing said, this is ridi-
      culous, all my prin-
      ted books have a few hy-
      phens, and I've ne-
      ver had any dif-
      ficulty rea-
      ding them. Maybe Ama-
      zon should just add "don't hyphenate" setting on their reading device and end it once and for all?

      What if you are writing about a new thing that you use multiple words to describe The Child-emperor was raised by an adoptive family. Leaving out the hyphens can be confusing. Leaving them in, almost never causes any confusion.

    13. Re:Why hyphenation in an e-text? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      But for Kindle if it's supported in Kindle Previewer, then someone screwed up pretty carelessly.

      I'd argue that if any WebKit-based reader doesn't support it, then someone screwed up pretty carelessly, but that's just me. :-)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  11. Welcome to what happens.... by iamwhoiamtoday · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When you host your content on someone else's systems.

    1. Re:Welcome to what happens.... by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      Host? You mean sell. This is a retailer selling someone's works only to stop when some moron complained about the punctuation.

    2. Re:Welcome to what happens.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My store, my rules. Your store, your rules. See how that works?

    3. Re:Welcome to what happens.... by ArcadeMan · · Score: 3, Funny

      My foot, your ass. See how that works? - Red Forman

    4. Re:Welcome to what happens.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My foot, your ass. See how that works? - Amazon

      FTFY

    5. Re:Welcome to what happens.... by westlake · · Score: 1

      Welcome to what happens when you host your content on someone else's systems.

      Amazon isn't your host.

      It's your printer and publisher --- and both have always had a say in grammar, style and formatting.

      The subscription service, Kindle Unlimited, has taken a lot of flack because these mostly self-published (aka vanity press) books have been edited so sloppily they wouldn't pass muster with your high school English teacher.

    6. Re: Welcome to what happens.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Bezos is a typical Republican. His kind gets off on destroying people via censorship.

    7. Re:Welcome to what happens.... by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Amazon isn't your host.

      It's your printer and publisher --- and both have always had a say in grammar, style and formatting.

      Uh, no. Amazon isn't a printer or publisher in any meaningful sense of the word. Many eBooks distributed by Amazon have an actual publisher associated with them, and for their print editions, have an actual printer, too. Amazon is more properly described as a distributor and a bookseller. Traditionally, neither has had any say in grammar, style, or formatting; their sole recourse is to refuse to carry a title that they feel is of insufficient quality, which is what Amazon does.

      The real problem with Amazon is that they also exercise monopolistic control over what can be read by Kindle readers, by not publishing the details of their file format and by disallowing the use of their publishing tools to create content for sale through any means other than their own online store. It is the electronic equivalent of the only bookstore chain in an entire country requiring you to use a nonstandard set of book dimensions and requiring that you exclusively sell any books with those dimensions through their store (in perpetuity). It is simply beyond insane, and the net effect is that Amazon can't simply tell people to distribute their junk books elsewhere, because people aren't allowed to do so. So instead of a nice curated collection, you end up with a steaming pile of crap.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    8. Re:Welcome to what happens.... by athenaprime · · Score: 1

      Self-publishing is much more different from vanity publishing than it used to be. Self-publishing is closer to micro-press publishing these days, thanks to automation in production and access to distribution chains formerly inaccessible. It's far easier (and more profitable) nowadays to self-publish a manuscript and contract out the same freelance editors as large commercial publishers use.

  12. Once every page and a half... by blueshift_1 · · Score: 1

    Over 100, so lets say there are 150. That's only one every 600 words for a 90,000 word book; basically it's only once every page and a half that it even occurs. Is it really that big of a deal? Not to mention fantasy tends to used the hyphen pretty regularly in names/places. It really just seems an odd thing to attack and try to minimize by the distributor. My guess is that they had one issue and now is just creating other issues. Silly amazon being silly as usual.

    1. Re:Once every page and a half... by moosehooey · · Score: 2

      They might mean over 100 unique words...

    2. Re:Once every page and a half... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Unless it means that there were over 100 unique hyphenated terms, each appearing multiple times.

      Excessive hyphenation is a very weird thing. Turns up a lot in forum comments.

    3. Re:Once every page and a half... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that would mean the 90,000 figure is also unique words. Not a chance.

    4. Re: Once every page and a half... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a subtle point, but instead of using the wrong hyphenation glyph, imagine he used l instead of 1 or I instead of l.
      l0IO1.

    5. Re: Once every page and a half... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why bother doing the math when the ruler of Amazon is a Republican and therefore hates Math. Showing his kind numbers is more like.y to make them violent than to change their minds.

    6. Re:Once every page and a half... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There were just over 100 hyphenated words in total, not unique words, and all compound-adjectives. I work with the author in a regular basis and have been through the manuscript since this 'problem' has been brought to light. While there are some examples that work without the hyphens, they are all correct in British English.

    7. Re: Once every page and a half... by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      Why bother writing that when you're an American and therefore hate math? If you think I'm overgeneralising, then you'll hopefully see my point.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  13. How many? "Over 100"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many did the novel contain? Over 100 tells us very little. Was it 1000, 10000, 50000 of the 90000 words? Those are all over 100.

  14. Welcome to by koan · · Score: 1

    The Age of The Whiner.
    From over hyphenation, to nerfed weapons in video games, to over regulation of the Internet due to trolls (you know... instead of ignoring them).

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    1. Re:Welcome to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, thank you for whining about the misleading, poorly-researched article that should be taken down immediately for its lack of accuracy.

      The truth came out in the author's blog, where he also loudly whined and blamed Amazon at first, but eventually discovered he had made too many typographical mistakes by using the wrong punctuation character instead of a hyphen, causing screen readers for the blind to speak the word "minus" every time it encountered one. He still didn't apologize for his mistake in blaming Amazon, but not everyone wants to admit it when they screw up.

    2. Re:Welcome to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And thank you for such a fine example of the whining we all detest. Brilliant work, sir!

      Oh wait, you were serious...

  15. if all they thought it had going against it was t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then that reader should be beaten with a tank hammer

  16. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by jcwayne · · Score: 1

    how-hard-is-it-to-proofread-the-dept
    no-im-not-new-here

    --
    Failure to follow this advice may result in non-deterministic behavior.
  17. Can I have some ... by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

    of what Melania G (the Amazon/Kindle exec) is smoking -- it must be really good stuff!

    1. Re:Can I have some ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes because clearly grammar checking and banning books is the job of one executive.

    2. Re:Can I have some ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only two possibilities there.. either high as a kite.. or recently divorced and hates the world.

  18. Tigger warning! by tepples · · Score: 1

    What's next? Taking down Winnie the Pooh because there are too many bounces before Tigger pounces?

    1. Re:Tigger warning! by mrbester · · Score: 1

      "We did not find 'worraworraworraworraworra' in our dictionary. This word also contains more letters than the target audience can reasonably be expected to comprehend. Please correct and resubmit."

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
  19. Some fo them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, the extra ones.

  20. So-what? by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    There were 100 words hyphenated out of 90,000? So-What?

    1. Re:So-what? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Those 100 words are repeated over 65536 times so it broke Amazon's word-counter program.

  21. Good luck not doing that by tepples · · Score: 0

    Good luck not "host[ing] your content on someone else's systems" when the market-dominating viewing device is hardcoded to use "someone else's systems". This appears to be true of both e-readers (Kindle) and handheld video game players with buttons (PlayStation Vita, Nintendo 3DS).

    1. Re:Good luck not doing that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Kindle can load its ebooks from anywhere. Sure, it's perhaps easier/faster to get them straight from Amazon, but there are no technical barriers whatever to loading any file you want onto your Kindle.

    2. Re:Good luck not doing that by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      I can load any damn PDF file I want on my Kindle, but I can't even change the images for the "screensaver". And no, it's not the cheaper-Kindle-but-you-get-ads model.

    3. Re:Good luck not doing that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting, changing the screensaver is one of the first things I do with these because I get tired of the birds and authors.

    4. Re:Good luck not doing that by StripedCow · · Score: 1

      Can't we have something like "net-neutrality" for e-readers and video viewers?
      I mean, it is kind of the same principle.

      --
      If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
    5. Re:Good luck not doing that by dgatwood · · Score: 2

      The Kindle can load its ebooks from anywhere. Sure, it's perhaps easier/faster to get them straight from Amazon, but there are no technical barriers whatever to loading any file you want onto your Kindle.

      Actually, there are technical barriers, and steep ones. Amazon does not use a standard eBook format, but rather uses its own custom binary blob. Because Amazon does not publish information about that format, there is exactly one tool that is known to generate this format in a guaranteed forward-compatible way. That tool, kindlegen, was written by Amazon, and the licensing terms from 2.0 onwards (the first version to support nontrivial formatting) do not allow you to use it for creating content that is sold outside Amazon's store. So in order to distribute content elsewhere, you have to either:

      • give it away for free,
      • violate Amazon's license,
      • use an unauthorized tool that produces content based on reverse engineering, which may or may not be even remotely correct, or
      • sell an EPUB book and require your readers to convert it to Kindle format themselves.

      None of these choices is viable, IMO. As such, I consider Kindle to be by far the single most locked-down eBook reader on the market today. At least when Apple puts licensing terms like that into their book generation software, they have the decency to document the format so that you aren't forced to use their toolchain....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    6. Re:Good luck not doing that by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      Because Amazon does not publish information about that format, there is exactly one tool that is known to generate this format in a guaranteed forward-compatible way. That tool, kindlegen, was written by Amazon, and the licensing terms from 2.0 onwards (the first version to support nontrivial formatting) do not allow you to use it for creating content that is sold outside Amazon's store. So in order to distribute content elsewhere, you have to either...

      Although I haven't used the tool myself, Amazon's description says that "KindleGen is a command line tool which enables publishers to work in an automated environment with a variety of source content including HTML, XHTML or EPUB." So unless there is something more to the licensing terms than you're suggesting, there shouldn't be any problem with creating your content in an open format, and then using KindleGen to generate the content for the Amazon store.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    7. Re:Good luck not doing that by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      It's not just the technical barriers. I own a Nook, which used bog-standard ePub. To buy a book from B&N, I go to the store page and buy a book. It then downloads automatically. To buy a book from elsewhere, I buy it and download it to my computer, plug my Nook into my computer, and copy it over. It's not that big a hassle, but lots of people aren't going to do that, or even realize that it's possible. It's just not as smooth, and I can't just do it anywhere I've got WiFi.

      With a really slick process for some stuff, even a mild hassle for the other stuff is going to be a real competitive disadvantage.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    8. Re:Good luck not doing that by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      So unless there is something more to the licensing terms than you're suggesting, there shouldn't be any problem with creating your content in an open format, and then using KindleGen to generate the content for the Amazon store.

      At issue is the fact that Kindle readers can only side-load content in MOBI format (plus non-reflowable horrors), and MOBI-format files can only (usefully) be produced by KindleGen. So the fact that you can sell the content in open formats through other stores is mostly irrelevant; you can't sell the content in open formats to Kindle users because they can't side-load an EPUB, and you can't sell the content in MOBI format because the license for the tool that trivially translates your source files into MOBI files won't let you resell those MOBI files outside Amazon's stores.

      So short of you selling it in an open format and telling your users to run a command-line tool, or telling them to install Java and then install Kindle Previewer (which, among other things, provides a crude GUI for KindleGen), what you're advocating isn't a realistic solution.

      With that said, Amazon's licensing changes annoyed me enough that I've seriously considered making the Kindle edition of my books available "free for registered EPUB users", so that users submit a web form and provide a copy of the EPUB book obtained from any EPUB store, and a script on the server verifies it and emails them a free copy of the MOBI book, thus effectively selling the MOBI book through every other online store, while still strictly complying with the terms of Amazon's license by only using it "to format works to be distributed at no charge". But although that would be easy for me to do, that's the sort of thing that 99% of writers out there couldn't pull off.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  22. It was probably the wrong kind of "hyphen" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are unfortunately lots of Unicode characters with the graphical appearance of a horizontal line at roughly the height of the middle line of a capital E. If you use the wrong one then it might look right for you but disastrously wrong for some readers. I suspect this may have happened in this case.

    1. Re:It was probably the wrong kind of "hyphen" by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      Then the author should have edited the book, replace every instance of a hyphen with the word "hyphen".

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    2. Re:It was probably the wrong kind of "hyphen" by Jethro · · Score: 1

      Wow. The first reasonable response in this entire discussion.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    3. Re:It was probably the wrong kind of "hyphen" by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      >There are unfortunately lots of Unicode characters with the graphical appearance of a horizontal line at roughly the height of the middle line of a capital E.

      How is that not redundant?

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    4. Re:It was probably the wrong kind of "hyphen" by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      ...which is precisely what he did. The Slashdot time warp strikes again.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  23. How many? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There is some ambiguity but if we don't care very much, we can go ahead and make an assumption that is often pretty good. When somebody says over X, X is usually the closest round number smaller than the quantity of interest. So, "over 100" is likely to be somewhere between 100 and 200, and almost certainly less than 1000. Moreover, whenever somebody says "over X," I take it to mean that the number is at least X and for the purpose of the argument they're willing to stand by their position even if it were exactly X. Although this particular novel exceeded the threshold, Amazon is claiming that even 100 hyphens per 90,000 words would be too many.

    1. Re:How many? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is some ambiguity but if we don't care very much, we can go ahead and make an assumption that is often pretty good. When somebody says over X, X is usually the closest round number smaller than the quantity of interest. So, "over 100" is likely to be somewhere between 100 and 200, and almost certainly less than 1000. Moreover, whenever somebody says "over X," I take it to mean that the number is at least X and for the purpose of the argument they're willing to stand by their position even if it were exactly X. Although this particular novel exceeded the threshold, Amazon is claiming that even 100 hyphens per 90,000 words would be too many.

      Unless it's a dating profile. In that world, I am "over 30".
      That detail that I'm also collecting Social Security can be left for a later conversation.

  24. What's next? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    Amazon will be telling authors to break their novels into chapters and paragraphs.

    1. Re:What's next? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      And after that, I bet they'll require a title. The bastards must be stopped.

    2. Re:What's next? by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Life doesn't happen in chapters — at least, not regular ones. Nor do movies. Homer didn't write in chapters. I can see what their purpose is in children's books ("I'll read to the end of the chapter, and then you must go to sleep") but I'm blessed if I know what function they serve in books for adults.
          -- Terry Pratchett

    3. Re:What's next? by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      One guy. Heinlein, Asimov. It's now two to one successful writers.

    4. Re:What's next? by dead_user · · Score: 2

      IMNSHO,
      Chapter breaks allow for a reader to be able to step away from the novel knowing they haven't left a cliffhanger on the next page. Think of it like a scene change in a movie. I can't stand just picking some random place to stop reading a book because I have to go. If I decide to quit reading in the middle of a chapter, I check to see how much is left. If it is just a page or two more, I'll finish the chapter.

      Paragraph breaks let my brain codify smaller chunks of data for parsing more efficiently than long run-on paragraphs. It just works better.

    5. Re:What's next? by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      I really don't care either way, I was just throwing the quote out there.

      However, I have to say that I have never had much of an issue reading a book without chapters. It's usually clear when there's a change of pace in the story. At most, you might have to scan the next line or so to confirm. If you have a long chapter anyway, there might be reasons you would find a stopping point before getting to the end. I guess I'd say that chapters don't really do any harm and some people like them but an author shouldn't feel obliged.

      Paragraphs, of course, are mandatory.

    6. Re:What's next? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Yes, even Finnegan's Wake had paragraphs. Of course one of them was, I think, three pages long. And a single sentence.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  25. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The only way Slashdot would publish a book is if Bennett Haselton wrote it.

  26. I suppose all Finnish language titles got banned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because hyphens are quite common in Finnish i suppose amazon nolonger sells any Finnish stories.

  27. Imagine what they think of a Lisp text by stox · · Score: 1

    Sorry, too many parens.

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
  28. I recently bought a book from Amazon... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 2
    ... that had too much use of the word "and," leading to an excessive amount of run-on sentences.

    .
    Maybe I should start hitting the Amazon reviews and flagging all the books whose grammar usage I find confusing.

    Let's see, this book uses strange and confusing Capitalization, making it difficult to read. Maybe Amazon should suppress it as well.

    1. Re:I recently bought a book from Amazon... by mrbester · · Score: 2

      "I bought this book of poetry in good faith based on recommendations. Has this 'e e cummings' never heard of capital letters? I demand a refund."

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
  29. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Haven't they already published several of his books?

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  30. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by gnupun · · Score: 1

    thats-too-expensive-let-the-cusomers-proof-read-it.

    Although, if amazon are taking in 30% of the sales, they do need to proof-read, since traditional publishers have been doing that for centuries.

  31. Book is Available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The book has been reformatted and is available again. Quit your bitching slashdot. Why do I waste my time here?

  32. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, your title is an (admittedly exaggerated) example of how hyphens can assist readability. The hyphens make clear that you are using a compound adjective. In fact, a common error in writing is omitting hyphens when they are necessary. For example, someone writing I saw a man eating alligator probably meant I saw a man-eating alligator .

  33. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly.

  34. Oh-dear by astro · · Score: 1

    I guess Burroughs, Céline and countless other authors need not apply.

  35. Re:How's Apple E-books looking now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple censors whatever the fuck they want and don't even give you the reasons.

    I hate you apple pushers so fucking much.

  36. Only Kindle store and DRM-free books by tepples · · Score: 1

    The Kindle can load its ebooks from anywhere.

    In that case, the market dynamic is more like Android, or like music on the iPod prior to iTunes Plus: supporting only one digital restrictions management platform as well as DRM-free works from anywhere.

    A lot of authors choose to use digital restrictions management so that they can sell more than one copy without having it be leaked to a mass infringement ring through an untraceable, judgment-proof member. The owner of an iPod can install DRM-free MP3 or M4A files from anywhere. But for nearly a decade after the iPod came out, the major record labels refused to sell DRM-free audio files over the Internet for fear of a leak to Napster or its successors (Gnutella, KaZaA, WinMX, and eDonkey2000), and iPod supported only the so-called FairPlay DRM platform used by iTunes. The owner of an Android device can install apps from anywhere (with "Unknown sources" turned on) with the APK file. But APK files lack DRM, so a lot of app developers publish their paid apps only through Google Play Store. And for the same reason, a lot of e-book authors publish their paid books only through DRM platforms. Can Kindle load e-books from any DRM platform, or does it support only Amazon's DRM platform?

    1. Re:Only Kindle store and DRM-free books by omnichad · · Score: 1

      But for nearly a decade after the iPod came out, the major record labels refused to sell DRM-free audio files over the Internet for fear of a leak to Napster or its successors

      Which was even more ridiculous, since they were already selling easily-ripped, drm-free physical CDs.

    2. Re:Only Kindle store and DRM-free books by tepples · · Score: 1

      Instead of DRM, physical CDs had the counterbalancing drawback of having to buy all the filler.

    3. Re:Only Kindle store and DRM-free books by omnichad · · Score: 1

      If you buy music from an artist, the album is an integrated work of art.

    4. Re:Only Kindle store and DRM-free books by tepples · · Score: 1

      Then why has radio overwhelmingly chosen not to play an album straight through?

  37. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by Oligonicella · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's self-publishing. No, they don't need to proof read.

  38. Amazon was being dumb by clovis · · Score: 4, Informative

    Looks like Amazon was being dumb.
    The problem was not too many hyphens, but rather that there were no hyphens. He had used the minus sign and that breaks some text-speech readers.
    Graeme has already fixed it.

    This is Graeme's blog telling the story, the problem, and the fix.
    https://graemereynolds.wordpre...

    1. Re:Amazon was being dumb by tshawkins · · Score: 1

      Yes and thier math is a little strange, Average paperback page is 400 words, which puts 90,000 word novel about 225 pages. They say that it had 100 hyphenated words, which is only one occurance every 2-3 pages, which does not sound excessive at all.

    2. Re:Amazon was being dumb by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be easier to reprogram a few text-to-speech readers to look for both hyphens and dashes based on context, instead of forcing the rest of the world to distinguish between two visually nearly-identical symbols? Do the readers also break when I type things like Quebec, resume, creme brulee, etc. without their accent marks?

    3. Re:Amazon was being dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume text-to-speech readers would always pronounce "resume" as the English verb.

    4. Re:Amazon was being dumb by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be easier to reprogram a few text-to-speech readers to look for both hyphens and dashes based on context,

      No, it wouldn't. Grammatical analysis is still a non-trivial task, as many of the syntactic rules are only applicable with certain words or classes of words -- ie there is no rule of "correct" syntax that can be determined without understanding the semantics. Without knowing the meaning and usage of two nouns, it would be impossible to computationally determine whether "woogoobloo–boobleell" should be correctly rendered "woogoobloo-boobleell" or "woogoobloo – boobleell". It's a task you could not do on a portable ebook reader on the fly. You might be able to manage a 75-90% accuracy on a cloud server model, but that's not efficient.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    5. Re:Amazon was being dumb by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      A basic syntactic analysis would probably identify it as a noun and pronounce it as intended (if it was used in a sentence) -- just as it would distinguish between the verb "record" and the noun "record".

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    6. Re:Amazon was being dumb by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Yeah, a rate of 1.1 hyphenated words per thousand isn't excessive at all. I grepped my own fiction writing, and determined that I average about four hyphenated words per thousand in fiction, or almost two per average printed page by your metric. One every 2.25 pages is nothing. :-)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  39. Re:How many? "Over 100"? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    Probably OVER 9000!!!

  40. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 4, Funny

    The difference between the two being particularly notable as someone who lives in Florida... the former is most often a native and the latter most often a tourist.

    --
    A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
  41. Could be worse. by Richy_T · · Score: 3, Funny

    Could have been a proctology book rejected for too many colons.

  42. They still sell Heideger's being-in-time by Saysys · · Score: 1

    They still sell Heideger's being-in-time : and his entire philosophical shtick is using hyphens!

  43. Too many notes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your work is ingenious. It's quality work. And there are simply too many notes, that's all. Just cut a few, and it will be perfect.

  44. That's not the whole story by Nate+the+greatest · · Score: 1

    It turns out that he did have a formatting issue in the ebook: http://the-digital-reader.com/... The author coded the ebook by hand and used minus signs in place of hyphens. While that would look okay when you read the ebook, a TTS engine would have issues.

  45. Alogrithms by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    So what if it turned out one of the character names was hyphenated?

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:Alogrithms by Tim+the+Gecko · · Score: 1

      Hurrah pour Robur-le-Conquérant ! s’écria une voix ironique.

      Robur-le-Conqérant by Jules Verne has over 1000 hyphens.

  46. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by Count+Fenring · · Score: 2

    Most man-eating alligators are natives... their food, on the other hand...

  47. Dammit! by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2

    There goes my book in morse code!

    --
    That is all.
  48. While we're on the subject... by ggraham412 · · Score: 2

    Not handling hyphens, minus signs or whatever: it doesn't surprise me in the least.

    Why don't eBook publishers use a typesetting system based on TeX or LaTeX? Good grief. I was formatting complex mathematical formulas and pretty printing them to Postscript and PDF before the lot of you were born. And not just text with mere hyphens.

    Is there something I'm missing, or are eBooks a major step backwards in formatting? Really. I can't tell you how many computer science and mathematics eBooks I've returned to Amazon or B&N because of the sh***y formatting of code and math formulas. Not just when eBooks first came out, but on and on, year after year, and it doesn't get better. It strikes me as the laziness of corporations.

    1. Re:While we're on the subject... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there a common eReader that can grok TeX or LaTeX directly?

    2. Re:While we're on the subject... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eBooks are intended for reflowable rendering on screens of varying sizes and aspect ratios, with different font settings. Typesetting and fixed-layout formats such as PDF are the complete opposite of that intention.

    3. Re:While we're on the subject... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a Javascript implementation of the Tex hyphenation algorithm that seems to work pretty well. Too bad the Kindle reader doesn't support any use of Javascript. Heck, I for one would be happy just to get support for Opentype features like small caps and lining figures, but I don't think that's going to happen anytime soon. And using Latex or MathML for math? On the Kindle? Hahahahahahaha.

      I've been in print production for over twenty years and now do ebook production, and yes, in many ways, ebooks are a big step backward. There are some advantages, but much is taken away.

    4. Re:While we're on the subject... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      LaTeX is absolutely better but the learning curve is a bit of a hike. Especially if you've never used a terminal.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:While we're on the subject... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not handling hyphens, minus signs or whatever: it doesn't surprise me in the least.

      Why don't eBook publishers use a typesetting system based on TeX or LaTeX? Good grief. I was formatting complex mathematical formulas and pretty printing them to Postscript and PDF before the lot of you were born. ...

      Umm, no

      Now YOU get of of MY lawn.

      And stop yelling at the clouds.

    6. Re:While we're on the subject... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ePub standard includes MathML for typesetting math, but as yet only a few readers support it. Kindle doesn't and Adobe Digital Editions (the basis of the Nook reader) is very poor. iBooks is not too bad, and Calibre incorporates MathJax. MathJax can also deal with LaTex, but it is Javascript and some readers (Kindle, etc.) do not support that. There are javascript implementations of the Tex hyphenation edition, but, see above,

      The money in ebooks is in romance and genre novels. Amazon et al do not care about more academic stuff or serious nonfiction. They are not going to make a big effort to make things like math, tables, etc., work well on their platforms.

    7. Re:While we're on the subject... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lyx

    8. Re:While we're on the subject... by dgatwood · · Score: 2

      Why don't eBook publishers use a typesetting system based on TeX or LaTeX?

      Let me count the reasons.

      • Books in electronic form must be reflowable, to accommodate variations in device size, and to accommodate rotation. What this means is that page numbers can change continuously. If I rotate a reader from portrait to landscape mode, then flip to the next page, then rotate it back into portrait orientation, there's no guarantee that the page boundaries are the same as they were in portrait orientation previously. So imagine having to run LaTeX on your entire document more than once per second, with a page offset, rendering only a subset of the content.
      • Books in electronic form require the ability to reliably link between documents. Good luck with that in LaTeX, much less in a hypothetical reflowing LaTeX.
      • LaTeX's font handling and Unicode glyph handling are dreadfully subpar even in XeLaTeX. Line breaks around em dashes and en dashes are as broken as they were in OS 9, requiring use of \hspace{0.001pt} after them if you want LaTeX to wrap correctly.
      • LaTeX is, IMO, terrible for anything that involves even basic custom formatting. I've used it for fiction book publishing. I have over 2,400 lines of custom LaTeX macros to prove it. By contrast, even when working around the quirks of multiple EPUB readers, I have only about 1,000 lines of simple CSS that gives almost exactly the same results as those 2,400 lines of seriously complex macro code in LaTeX. To be fair, there's a bit of Perl content translation code that replaces a little bit of macro code, so the difference isn't quite as extreme as it sounds, but it's a lot easier to do math computation in Perl than in LaTeX macro code, and a good chunk of that math was only required because LaTeX lacks some fairly basic formatting functionality, such as an equivalent for the CSS min-width property. LaTeX is positively primitive when compared with HTML and CSS, IMO.
      • LaTeX is a write-only language. Like Tom Christenson said about Perl, nothing can parse LaTeX other than LaTeX. It is basically impossible to properly translate LaTeX into any other form, which makes it a terrible source language. Most people writing content want to write once and reuse in different formats, so you're better off starting in a proper semantic markup language like XML. And if you're starting from XML, it's easy to spit out HTML. It is butt ugly to spit out LaTeX. Been there, done that. I have almost 800 lines of custom XSL on top of the existing DocBook2XML code to prove it.

      There are probably many more reasons I could think of if I took the time, but that's just what comes to mind off the top of my head. Knowing what I know now, if I had to do my latest project over again, I would have written a custom typesetter in JavaScript that runs in a custom WebKit-based app. It would have been faster, and I would have had more control. I can't even imagine trying to use LaTeX in an eBook reader. It would be like printing a book using a million Chinese workers with quill pens.

      What math and CS book publishers should be doing is formatting formulas using LaTeX and converting the PDFs to SVG images. That should give you nicely formatted formulas whose text is still searchable. The rest of the content should be HTML, just like any other eBook. It isn't rocket science; the publishers you've dealt with just don't care about those books enough to do the job correctly. :-)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    9. Re:While we're on the subject... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On some readers (again, Kindle) SVG support is only slightly better than MathML support.

    10. Re:While we're on the subject... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Going on a limb with this, but part of the degeneration of typesetting standards in eBooks likely has much to do with the prevalence of terrible web design. Most of your target audience is used to dealing with crap, so it sets the bar quite low for yet another release of content to the Internet.

      Thus the trend is likely to continue, IMHO.

    11. Re:While we're on the subject... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      So that the ereader can be quickly and cheaply based on a modified Webkit engine

    12. Re:While we're on the subject... by ggraham412 · · Score: 1

      These are good points, thanks for elucidating.

    13. Re:While we're on the subject... by Mryll · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if still exists, but Scientific Word was a pretty good front end for it many years back.

    14. Re:While we're on the subject... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for Scientific Word, but the attempts at front ends that I've used before have all been moderately difficult to understand didn't already have a latex mindset.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    15. Re:While we're on the subject... by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Unless you mean the old e-ink Kindles (pre-KF8), that runs contrary to my experience. All the modern Kindle readers are based on WebKit, and WebKit's SVG support is generally very solid. What problems are you seeing?

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    16. Re: While we're on the subject... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oddly, the kindle will display svg, it won't do tap and scale with them. which I consider a defect. iBooks will do it. this is a problem with maps and charts with text labels. just because it's webkit doesn't mean features are properly implemented.

  49. If only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only they would do the same for parentheses.

  50. amazon = Nazi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    censorship is bad as well as abusing workers.

    the workers in germany need to strike till they get what they want.

  51. So what's next by atouk · · Score: 1

    Amazon decided to pull a book because of punctuation. I guess next time it sentence structure, or maybe using certain words too many times. And words in sentences lead to ideas, so any ideas that Amazon feels affects the reader in a negative manner should also be blocked. From punctuation, to language, to the author's thoughts and intents of putting word to paper, once Amazon starts to believe that it is the arbiter of what is good, or allowable to it's readers, then authors and readers should decide that maybe Amazon isn't what's best for them.

    1. Re:So what's next by itsdapead · · Score: 1

      Amazon decided to pull a book because of punctuation.

      No, as a dozen people have posted before you, they decided to pull a book because of a technical typesetting error (Unicode minus signs in place of hyphens) that would screw up page formatting (hyphens are significant to text-wrapping and auto-hyphenation algorithms) and text-to-speech (or should I say 'textminustominusspeech'?)

      I guess next time it sentence structure, or maybe using certain words too many times.

      That's exactly what a decent copy editor would look at (as well as knowing when to use an m-dash, a minus sign or a hyphen) and would be a valuable service to self-publishing authors. Bring it on.

      And words in sentences lead to ideas,

      ...and words in sentences communicate ideas more effectively when they are properly spelled, punctuated and typeset. That doesn't affect the message.

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  52. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

    I thought, they preferred, commas, that have, no logical reason, to be, there.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  53. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

    That's what I meant. Posting too early in the morning...

    --
    A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
  54. Re: from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this de by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The book was professionally edited. It's by a British author using British english. While some of the hyphens could have been removed they were not grammatically incorrect. The problem seems to be that Amazon does not recognise British grammar and punctuation differences.

  55. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by Enry · · Score: 5, Informative

    In traditional book publishing, the author gets about 5% of the list. The publisher sells the book to a retailer for 50% of the list price and the author typically get about 10% of what the publisher sells it for. At least that's what it was in my case. So getting 70% on a self-published book isn't a bad deal. Though editors are still important.

  56. Cormac McCarthy by kruach+aum · · Score: 1

    Waiting for amazon to ban Blood Meridian for shitty interpunction.

  57. Illiterate Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, yet another confirmation that almost no one at Amazon understands books. A mere 100+ hyphenated words in a 90,000 word novel sounds almost spartan. Quite a few new words start off hyphenated, such as e-mail. And it's proper practice to hyphenate certain pairs of adjectives, such as 'Ice-age tribes.' I edit scientific books, and they're filled with such pairs.

    This also illustrates Amazon control freaky attitude. Although they provide little of the useful services offered by publisher and editors, Amazon does step in from time to time and, in some really stupid way, and play the role of a publisher or editor. When it comes to authors, Amazon is like Comcast. Its basic attitude is "We're smart, you're stupid, so do as we say."

    Amazon can be so stupid, it's easy to suspect that'd stop the sale of Ernst Hemingway if some reader complained that his sentences were too short.

    I just checked the iBookstore, Smashwords and B&N's Nook store. None are carrying Graeme Reynolds's ebook. That is a major, major blunder. Amazon did change their mind. His book is available again from them. But he'd have been wiser to have it available from multiple retailers. Don't put all your eggs in one basket, least of all control-obsessed Amazon.

    He may, as the article claims, not have know the different uses of dashes. That could explain why what few hyphens he has, some say, look like the much large M-dashes. Here's are the basic rules.

    Hyphen is the key on your keyboard. Use it for hyphenated words either to combine two into one joined word (Ice-age tribes) or to wrap a word at the end of a line.

    N-dash. There'll be a special key sequence for this. It's a dash the width of the letter N, hence the name. Use this for a range of values, such as "you will find that discussed on pages 37Ã"43."

    M-dash. This is the really long one, one as long as a capital M is wide. Use it, typically in pairs, to set off text more vividly than with commas. Example: "TomÃ"and this is his most obvious faultÃ"is a liar pure and simple."

    Glad to hear his book is available again.

    --Michael W. Perry, co-author of Lily's Ride

  58. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 5, Funny

    I imagine #they'd totally $freak at a @book about &perl.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  59. it wasn't about text-to-speech by epine · · Score: 2

    From Hyphen Hate? When Amazon went to war against punctuation

    A ridiculous number of people have gotten caught up in the whole âoehe used a minus sign instead of an ascii hyphen! The bastardâ controversy that has followed this thread around and has spilled over into any number of internet message boards. First of all, let me be clear. The issue was not with my use of a minus sign. The issue Amazon had was that someone had complained about hyphenation. Second, I have since gone back and checked the original file on the Kindle text-to-speech app and it renders fine. No issues. [my emph.]

    <acerbic>
    These days 75% of all Slashdot posts seem to involve drilling down to get the original story straight. Tell me, when did a mass-confusion clusterfuck become the new nerd foreplay? Kindle typography, meet declining Slashdot editorial standards. You've got more in common than you think.
    </acerbic>

  60. Missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since Graeme posted about the problems with Amazon, everyone on the internet seems to have an opinion. The arguments range from the book not having been proofread to bad use of punctuation to bad formatting. Let me clear a few things up.
    Yes, the use of a minus sign rather than a hyphen was incorrect (and has now been corrected), but Amazon made it clear in their email that they had removed the book from sale because of 'hyphenated words' so their system recognised the minus sign as a hyphen.
    The book was not a self-published piece of work by someone who had no clue what they were doing. Graeme Reynolds is a professional and the book went through a rigorous editing process. There have been over 100 5* reviews in the 18 months it has been on sale and this is the first time anyone has complained about the grammar or punctuation.
    The use of hyphens was correct. This may sound odd to some of you, but it was. Graeme Reynolds is a British author writing in British English and his books are set in Britain. While some of the hyphens can be removed without changing the meaning of the words, they are all correct in British English. Amazon wanted the removal of all hyphens which would make the book unreadable.
    The reason Graeme Reynolds publicly voiced his anger at their decision was because Amazon were essentially removing the book because of the writing style rather than an issue with incorrect grammar or punctuation, and that they based their decision on a reader's complaint rather than investigating first. What happens next time when someone complains that a writer has placed commas at the top of the letters rather than the bottom? Do we then have to remove apostrophes so we don't confuse people?

  61. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by ClickOnThis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The hyphens make clear that you are using a compound adjective. In fact, a common error in writing is omitting hyphens when they are necessary. For example, someone writing I saw a man eating alligator probably meant I saw a man-eating alligator .

    This, this and this.

    Awhile ago, we saw a story on this site about a chocolate printer. Of course this was actually a chocolate-printer, a device that prints using chocolate. However, without the hyphen, it refers to a printer that is made out of chocolate. Without the hyphen, what are we to make of The Chocolate Lover's Cookbook?

    Hyphens are also important when one needs to disambiguate between compound adjectives and compound nouns. What's a high school building? A building that's a high school (a high-school building) or a school building that is high (a high school-building)?

    Hyphens are just another example of how we treat punctuation marks as though they were boogers, something to be expunged and discarded, kept away from ourselves and others. But without them, we cannot distinguish a panda bear who eats shoots and leaves from a mob hit-man who eats, shoots and leaves.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  62. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

    Do tourists not eat alligators? Don't they sell it in restaurants.

    I know they didn't have it on the menu at Disney.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  63. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by macs4all · · Score: 1

    I-know-it's-their-imprint-and-all-;-but-sheesh!-Talk-about-your-grammar-nazis...

  64. orly? by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    You know, a C# textbook I got on Amazon really did have too many { and ; in it.

  65. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by Skylinux · · Score: 1

    actually.We.Are.More.Into.Dots.Around.Here

    --
    Everyone who buys Wild Hunt will receive 16 specially prepared DLCs absolutely for free, regardless of platform.
  66. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by macs4all · · Score: 1

    Hyphens are just another example of how we treat punctuation marks as though they were boogers, something to be expunged and discarded, kept away from ourselves and others. But without them, we cannot distinguish a panda bear who eats shoots and leaves from a mob hit-man who eats, shoots and leaves.

    This.

    I cannot count how many times I have been excoriated in these very pages for my "excessive" use of quotation-marks.

    I then feel compelled to "defend" myself, citing the grammatical rules that show all the alternate uses of same.

    Fortunately, that usually shuts up those people.

  67. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by xaotikdesigns · · Score: 1

    They are a distribution and a print on demand service, not a publisher.

    --
    XDInd
  68. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by macs4all · · Score: 2

    I imagine #they'd totally $freak at a @book about &perl.

    Or even better, APL.

  69. Re: from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this d by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Maybe they had a lot of characters with hyphenated names? Or exotic locales?

    This is why we can't let Amazon become a virtual monopoly on books... Because they have ZERO obligation to inform the public of their ditto risk decisions. Flagging an upcoming book for "too many hyphens" is pretty severe censorship of the worst kind... AUTOMATED.

  70. -but- by rossdee · · Score: 1

    I get the Mpls Star-Tribune via Kindle subscription, and usually read it on my phone.
    Quite often articles in said journal are messed up when I read them, with all the long words coming out hyp-hen-ated.

  71. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by ClickOnThis · · Score: 2

    I imagine #they'd totally $freak at a @book about &perl.

    Or even better, APL.

    Or Brainfuck, more politely known as B****fuck.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  72. FYI: definition of an en-dash by NotPeteMcCabe · · Score: 1
    There are three kinds of "dashes" commonly used. A hyphen is what you have on your keyboard next to the zero. This is used for hyphenating words (who knew?) and for compound adjectives (a man-eating alligator). An en-dash got its name because it is the width of the block of type used for the letter "n" in the same font. Em-dash was named for the width of the block of type for an "m".

    The en-dash is primarily used for both a minus sign and to indicate ranges in numbers (from 2–3 days). The em-dash is used as a kind of parenthesis (I am saying—not for the first time—that I am mad).

    On a Mac you make an en-dash with option-hyphen, and an em-dash with option-shift-hyphen. I haven't used a PC for this kind of work in at least 10 years, but I do recall that entering en- and em-dashes was a hassle.

  73. This could be a problem .... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... for my upcoming book, "Programming with Brainfuck".

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  74. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

    They do sometimes but generally alligators tend to eat (stupid) tourists.

    --
    A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
  75. Others to suppress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess they should surpress Tolstoy's "War and Peace" for having too many words... Or Seus's "The Cat In The Hat" for too much silliness. Get real Amazon! You are NOT supposed to be the arbiter of good literary taste or form! You are supposed to sell books that the public wants to read!

  76. Re: from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this de by rochrist · · Score: 1

    I expect it's an artifact of the coversion to e-book. I've seen it a lot in self-published books. Cases where words that shouldn't be hyphenated are and it's very obvious when it happens. That's the only reason I can see for this happening.

  77. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

    Which tastes more like chicken? Human or Alligator?

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  78. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by Immerman · · Score: 4, Informative

    Spoken language contains many variations of timing and inflection that clarify such things. Punctuation exists specifically to impart a rough approximation of those subtleties to the comparatively crude written language.

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  79. Single complaint? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then, on 12 December, Reynolds got an email from the internet retailer, which had apparently received a complaint from a reader

    So let me get this straight, A SINGLE COMPLAINT got this guys novel pulled!?! Who was the person that complained anyway CEO of Amazon?

    1. Re:Single complaint? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's THE CUSTOMER who is always right!

    2. Re:Single complaint? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's THE CUSTOMER who is always right!

      If that one customer wants their money back, you give it to them. You don't prevent other customers from purchasing it and forming their own opinion.

  80. You know what else impacts readability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "This,

    * A comma between subject and predicate

    apparently 'significantly impacts the readability of your book' and, as a result, 'We

    * Capitalizing a word after a comma

    have suppressed the book because of the combined impact to customers.'"

  81. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Flooding their market with junk books devalues the market as a whole.

  82. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Or why nobody understands what "chicken fried steak" is, but might very well understand what chicken-fried steak is.

  83. Amazon is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is next? Banning Ulysses from Joyce because the sentences are too long?

  84. Re:f-o-x-t-r-o-t-u-n-i-f-o-r-m-c-h-a-r-l-i-e-k-i-l by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You hurt my brain.

  85. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

    Sorry, that hyphen does nothing. What on Earth is one of those when it's at home?!?

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  86. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by narcc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    without them, we cannot distinguish a panda bear who eats shoots and leaves from a mob hit-man who eats, shoots and leaves.

    No Oxford comma? Mod parent down!

  87. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by narcc · · Score: 3, Funny

    It probably has a better chance than my book: Whitespace by example

  88. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by omnichad · · Score: 1

    What on Earth is one of those when it's at home?!?

    Cannot parse.

  89. Emily Dickenson? by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    Does Amazon sell collections of Emily Dickenson poetry? She was mad into the humble hyphen.

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  90. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

    My "Brainfuck for Dummies" book will have a lot of buggy sample code now that Amazon has decided I can only make 1 decrement per 10000 instructions. So I have to implement Brainfuck unit tests... and I just finished the chapter on how to write the code delinter and the JIT compiler!

  91. Re: from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this de by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > pompous ignorami
    I bet that isn't even the correct Latin declination.

  92. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Judging that you're not American, "Chicken-fried steak" is a tenderized steak, breaded and fried in the manner that "fried chicken" is done. Common usage/writing leaves out the hyphen (even on restaurant menus), so it's unclear that it's a compound adjective. As a result, people assume that it contains chicken or have no idea what to expect.

  93. Great... by vomitology · · Score: 1

    There goes my idea to self-publish "The Complete Works of Edgar Allan Poe in Morse Code".

    --
    ~Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit, but Wisdom is knowing not to put it in a fruit salad.
  94. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

    So, schnitzel then?

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  95. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Different breading, but similar idea.

  96. Morse Code? by marciot · · Score: 1

    Shoot. There goes my idea of self-publishing a book written entirely in morse code.

  97. Tolkien used *way* more hyphens by Scryer · · Score: 1

    I just did a quick cat / tr / grep / wc on Lord of the Rings, and got:

    Fellowship of the Rings: 1361 hyphenated words out of 178,672
    The Two Towers: 1047 of 154,403
    Return of the King: 829 of 135,285

    This guy gets kicked to the curb for 100 hyphens out of 90,000 words? Pooh. It's a matter of style.

  98. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

    Oxford commas are optional, and recommended when they improve clarity. In this case, the one after "eats" is enough. Besides, I was quoting the title of the well-known book.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  99. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by gnupun · · Score: 1

    And you think proof reading is the only difference between a amazon digital book and a traditionally published book? A paper book publisher does cover design, has a printing press to print books and ships books to distributors and retailers. Those are the main reasons for the small cut for the author. Digital books have no printing and transportation costs. Plus, the paper book author had no choice but to get what tiny income he could because there was no practical way to sell books without a publisher. With the internet, you don't need any publisher, not even amazon.

    Simply hosting a few MB file (the book) and processing a credit card payment is not enough to justify charging 30%. The need to proof read too. Apple checks (proof reads) apps before they are published in the app store.

  100. And don't get me started on "Stupid Quotes"... by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

    ...which is what they should be called.

    --

    I'm not repeating myself
    I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
  101. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We'll never know what happened last weekend to little Robert: he either helped his uncle, jack, off a horse or he helped his uncle jack off a horse.

  102. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

    It's not difficult to parse the syntax, even if you can't grasp the semantic meaning.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  103. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by omnichad · · Score: 1

    One of what? Why does it have a home?

  104. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by Enry · · Score: 1

    And you think proof reading is the only difference between a amazon digital book and a traditionally published book?

    Don't put words in my mouth. I handled the cover design for my books, though the publisher did offer to do it and did convert it into a format that was better suited for a book cover. I wrote technical books, so the publisher also paid for technical assessments to make sure I wasn't wrong along with the editing. Those are very valuable services.

    Simply hosting a few MB file (the book) and processing a credit card payment is not enough to justify charging 30%.

    But hosting a few dead trees in a warehouse is worth 50% of a book? Amazon is the 300lb gorilla in book sales, so they'll charge what they think they can get away with. If another vendor comes along and gets the name recognition that Amazon has and only takes 20%, then Amazon may change their ways.

    Don't get me wrong, I think it's great that authors have lots of options to get their work out. But the choice is they either get about 5% and have a huge infrastructure behind them to help get their work out, promoted, and looking nice, or doing most of it themselves and getting 70% and hope they have an underground hit that lots of people buy.

  105. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Oxford comma is so twentieth century.

    (And yet I love it so)

  106. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, but you can improve the clarity of the spoken language by also including punctuation. Victor Borge provided us with a fine guide to phonetic punctuation. http://community.eflclassroom.com/video/victor-borge-phonetic-punctuation

  107. Reminds me of the Dragonriders of Pern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have all those names with apostrophes in them.
    Damn annoying to read.

  108. Hyphen hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    100 hyphens out of 90,000 words???? Are you freaking kidding me?????

  109. A reverend from Mississippi by Gallomimia · · Score: 1

    Sounds to me like they've gotten a call from a now infamous Reverend from Mississippi who called a now infamous radio station regarding the foul language, despite the warnings preceding it, contained within a now infamous record of spoken word by the now infamous George Carlin.
    It's no different. First it was radio broadcast, then it was Television broadcast, now it's cable and satellite, video games have ratings and restrictions too. Here comes books, and finally, the internet.
    Then there will be nothing at all to stop the Ministry of Truth. Beware the thought police!
    We now interrupt this post for the daily two-minutes-hate.

    --
    Sadly, a Libertarian cannot force his views on another, and freedom cannot spread as does the cancer known as religion.
  110. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

    A) A chicken-fried steak. What is one of those? (Now answered.)
    B) The "when it's at home" is just a turn of phrase used to emphasise cluelessness. At least where I'm from.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  111. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by omnichad · · Score: 1

    To someone unfamiliar with that idiom, it sounds like someone who isn't fluent in English. Now that I know what it means, I just think it's weird to hear that phrase used for a non-person entity.

  112. Re: from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this de by athenaprime · · Score: 1

    Your response is predicated on the assumption that the Amazon Algorithms operate in a logic-based environment. This has not been proven to be the case. Amazon can remove books and other items from its store arbitrarily, and according to no logic known to humankind. It does the same to reviews of books and other products. I've gotten ebooks (from major publishers, I might add) with artifacts of conversion that were far more egregious than hyphens (leftover XML code, LaTeX symbols, etc.) from Amazon. Some books will feature complaints about formatting or editing in dozens of reviews and Amazon does nothing, while others, like this one, will be pulled for unsubstantiated customer complaints, or worse--customer complaints about an entirely different book! The almighty algorithms are great 90% of the time, but humans do still need to oversee.

  113. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by athenaprime · · Score: 1

    Whereas "chicken fried steak" probably indicates that one is in possession of domestic fowl with culinary skills...

  114. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spoken language is also often misunderstood and needs to be clarified by the speaker, sometimes with a whiteboard or pictures to assist.

    If you are playing a game, and the rules state you need to choose between the following: pass, play, draw and discard. Does that mean you have to discard if you draw? Or not? How many piles do I have if I have one pile each for for my carrots, lettuce, macaroni and cheese? Three or four?

    Unless you specifically mean three, or you must discard after drawing, then PLEASE just use the oxford comma so people know what the heck you mean. There's a reason why serious style guides mandate this: it often significantly changes the meaning of the sentence.

  115. Re: from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this de by rochrist · · Score: 1

    You could be right. I'm certainly usually the first one in the Amazon sux line.

  116. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by Forever+Wondering · · Score: 1

    According to Merriam Webster, "hit man" should not be hyphenated ...

    --
    Like a good neighbor, fsck is there ...
  117. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

    According to Merriam Webster, "hit man" should not be hyphenated ...

    Alas, Merriam-Webster is part of the problem. A "hit-man" is an assassin, but a "hit man" is a man who has been hit.

    I confess that my opinion on hyphens has been influenced strongly by an article I read years ago, and for which I can no longer find a link. The author of that piece ranted in particular about irregularities in Merriam-Webster on the matter of hyphens. For example, "bee-eater", a beautiful bird whose diet includes stinging insects, becomes in Merriam-Webster a "bee eater", a bee who eats.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  118. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

    We'll never know what happened last weekend to little Robert: he either helped his uncle, jack, off a horse or he helped his uncle jack off a horse.

    And the horse has four legs and flies.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  119. Still missing the point . . . by hawk · · Score: 1

    It's not the hyphens.

    *ANYTHING* that cuts another vampire/zombie/werewolf book needs to be viewed as a goodthing . . .

    hawk

  120. Amazon "Suppresses" Book With Too Many Hyphens by janenichols · · Score: 1

    Hyphen, Most commonly used by every one. For a punctuation, Penalizing the book wasn't expected..

  121. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    Flooding their market with junk books devalues the market as a whole.

    If you're the sort of person who relies on the likes of Amazon (high volume, low-margin pile-it-high-and-sell-it-cheap merchants) as your personal arbiter of taste and relevance, then yes you'd devalue your market. However, by taking Amazon as a reviewer of books, you've already suspended your judgement to a high degree.

    A couple of weeks ago I was pointed to Amazon by a friend who'd written a new book (not, by about 10 books, his first publication, but I think his first with Amazon). Amazon would only admit to the existence of a Kindle version - which I might have considered if it were a manual or a text-based book. But for a book allegedly rich in my friend's generally excellent photography of his several month's travelling in Patagonia and southern South America, a screen simply isn't the appropriate format.

    So, eventually, Amazon, by pushing their Kindle version lost about £10 of trade in Kindle editions, and the ink-on-paper publishers got about £70 for the print editions (of the photo book, and the accompanying travelogue book) ; way to go, Amazon!

    The wife and I noted their efforts to force us off getting discs form Lovefilm and onto downloading shit off their website somewhere. Nope ; not interested ; account cancelled and a pits-on-polycarbonate account opened with a different provider. Oh dear. What a pity. How sad. Never. mind.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  122. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by pupsocket · · Score: 1

    The term "Oxford comma" exists only because the term "Chicago omission" would not indicate something visible. There was no such thing as an Oxford comma until the Chicago omission was invented. Omitting the comma creates a jarring inconsistency, results in unnecessary doubletakes, and fails to convey the cadences and inflections of the spoken sentence.

  123. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by Immerman · · Score: 1

    Ah, but state those rules out loud (assuming you are already confident as to what they are) and the comma or its lack will almost certainly be apparent in your speech, at least to an astute listener. Which is also the reason I use it sporadically in "and" conjunctions as well - in that case the alternatives are usually roughly equivalent, but may have subtly different implications. I write like I speak, and commas appear in the places where I pause to separate concepts. It may not always adhere to the formal rules, but is usually clearly comprehensible. I think.

    Which raises the question: how to write a sentence to proactively state that you do in fact mean for "draw and discard" to be a discrete concept?
    If I say "I have one pile each for for my carrots, lettuce, , macaroni and cheese.", does that clarify that I do in fact have three piles*? The english language would well benefit from an equivalent to mathematical parenthesis, or perhaps something somewhat more expressive. Conciseness in language is not something that should have to depend on the normal usage of language being concise - it never will be. For maximum utility and adoption it should be something where the various common permutations can be seamlessly dropped in to a casual conversation where conciseness is useful, before disappearing again into the rough-and-tumble realities of casual conversation.

    * Yes, I do consider .", to be the correct punctuation - how else would you unambiguously characterize the way that sentence should be read?

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  124. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

    *shrug* I'm sure you say plenty of stuff that would sound weird to me.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  125. Re:from the what-until-they-get-a-load-of-this dep by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

    Like chicken fried steak, for starters....

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'