Slashdot Mirror


Comcast's Lobbyists Hand Out VIP Cards To Skip the Customer Service Wait

An anonymous reader writes: A lengthy story about how David Gregory lost his job hosting Meet the Press holds an interesting tidbit: Comcast's team of lobbyists regularly hands out VIP cards to influential (and influence-able) people in Washington that lets them bypass normal customer service and fast-track their support problems. "Its government-affairs team carried around 'We'll make it right' cards stamped with 'priority assistance' codes for fast-tracking help and handed them out to congressional staffers, journalists, and other influential Washingtonians who complained about their service. A Comcast spokeswoman says this practice isn't exclusive to DC; every Comcast employee receives the cards, which they can distribute to any customer with cable or internet trouble. Nevertheless, efforts like this one have surely helped Comcast boost its standing inside the Beltway and improve its chances of winning regulatory approval for its next big conquest: merging with the second-largest cable provider in the country, Time Warner Cable." (The David Gregory article is worth a look on it's own, too; it shows how Comcast's purchase of NBC has led to interference in NBC's attempts at real journalism.)

131 comments

  1. Right... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    So, according to the story, 'every employee' receives the cards, for distribution to 'any customer with cable or internet trouble'. Do remind me, then, of what advantage these cards have over the ordinary support apparatus (allegedly) handling customers who are having issues?

    Either the story is BS, and the cards are in fact better than being stuck in phone-drone hell; or the cards are BS, and nothing more than an informational tool to see what comcast employee ended up referring you to the same quagmire that everyone wanders through. Decisions, decisions.

    1. Re:Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You assume that every Comcast customer is personal friends with a Comcast employee? Why these cards are given to low ranking pawns I have no idea, but discrimination against customers based on their perceive influence should not be a surprising behavior from a company operating in an industry that is prone to "natural monopolies"(in a regulatory environment that hasn't taken significant anti-trust action since the 1990s).

    2. Re:Right... by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Microsoft used to give all customer facing employees 5 of these, too. Ingratiating.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    3. Re:Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're very limited and can only be used once.

    4. Re:Right... by Echo_Hotel · · Score: 0

      I'd never heard of those things when I was working comcast home networking support earlier this year so unless this is new since October or things were being sent to a completely different department than everybody else this is just total BS. The premium support that Comcast used to have was rolled into the standard package back in December 2013 so as far as I now everything that isn't business class escalates through the same chain, sure we used to give out the department phone# for quick access but it's hardly a secret.

    5. Re:Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You assume that every Comcast customer is personal friends with a Comcast employee? Why these cards are given to low ranking pawns I have no idea, but discrimination against customers based on their perceive influence should not be a surprising behavior from a company operating in an industry that is prone to "natural monopolies"(in a regulatory environment that hasn't taken significant anti-trust action since the 1990s).

      There is nothing natural about [city | county] granted monopolies.

    6. Re:Right... by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Not specifically - but any situation that requires per-customer infrastructure buildout or otherwise benefits from network effects or economies of scale will tend to naturally form a monopoly, even without government interference. And when deploying and maintaining such infrastructure requires digging up streets or hanging stuff on utility poles, the local populace (by way of government) has a vested interest in minimizing redundant infrastructure and the associated risks and inconveniences of maintenance. Which pretty much translates to accepting the inevitability of a monopoly, and at least strapping some regulations on them in th process. Of course regulatory capture tends to undermine those pretty quickly.

      Personally I think a better way to handle such natural monopolies might be to separate infrastructure from service: There's one power line company, one dataline company, one waterline company, etc. But all of them are prohibited from selling any services to customers - instead they can only rent customer access to service providers (probably at a flat rate, with mandatory service availability - that's the price of getting the monopoly). Slightly complicated for things like water and power where there's not really a 1:1 correspondence between source and sink, but flow metering is already in place, so really it's mostly a matter of just making sure the incoming water/power is meeting the required quality standards.

      That wouldn't totally fix the problem, but at least it would help avoid regulatory capture since you've got competing business interests lobbying different sides of the regulatory debate. Might be able to improve things even further by having the -line companies not actually own the infrastructure, instead being essentially a deployment and maintenance company hired by the government to service the infrastructure - not unlike road maintenance crews. Get too greedy and the city/county can just fire them and hire a replacement: the infrastructure belongs to the people. You'd probably have some tragedy of the commons issues there, but carefully incentivized contracts could probably keep that to a minimum, and it's not like the current situation is leading to companies falling all over themselves to properly maintain the infrastructure.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    7. Re:Right... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      The story is BS. All employees do not get the cards to hand out. I have several friends that still work at Comcast, and none of them have the cards or have heard of them before this story broke.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Verizon does not give out cards, they ask employees in all departments to make sure customer complaints get handled appropriately. Sometimes it is easiest to talk to a friend who is a verizon employee because you might get an unlisted phone number...

    9. Re:Right... by silfen · · Score: 1

      And when deploying and maintaining such infrastructure requires digging up streets or hanging stuff on utility poles, the local populace (by way of government) has a vested interest in minimizing redundant infrastructure and the associated risks and inconveniences of maintenance. ... That wouldn't totally fix the problem

      It wouldn't fix the problem because you are not correctly diagnosing the problem. The problem is not some weird tie between service and wires. The problem is that the people deciding about who can dig up the road in my neighborhood are, in fact, not the people actually affected by digging up the road in my neighborhood or who have to bear the monopoly pricing their artificial monopolies create. The real problem is that government isn't local enough, even at the city level, given the size modern cities have.

      People are increasingly dealing with this nonsense and failure of local government by simply moving to gated communities and/or using technology to circumvent dysfunctional monopolies. Of course, local governments then often impose mandatory purchasing of services residents don't need and want.

      As for the technical issues, there is little reason to impose one "___line" requirements, nor for government or holding companies to worry about what wires to put in. A more rational choice would be simply to manage space. Conduits and space on poles can simply be leased, and the leases are auctioned off every four years (if the lines are still good when a lease ends, companies can sell them to each other). Furthermore, if access through someone's backyard is easier, private property owners can sell easements.

    10. Re:Right... by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Well, I won't argue with you there - giving more power over regional decisions to individual city districts would probably help as well. But I can assure you that even in small towns regulatory capture results in... sub-optimal implementations.

      As for your conduit/pole renting scheme - that might work. But I suspect what would happen is that the existing monopolist would make clear that they'd be selling their deployed lines at more than the cost to deploy all new lines, severely disincentivizing any competing bids, especially when you consider that the city is unlikely to allow significant down time to deploy new lines.

      Private easements through people's back yards are probably a non-starter, especially for power - one of the reasons lines run down streets is because of ease of maintenance and relative safety in case of damage - a power line downed in the street is far less likely to start neighborhood threatening fires than one in your back yard. Underground conduit would be less of an issue though.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    11. Re: Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The two aren't exclusive. You could give some to every employee and still have the vast majority of customers never get one.

      Microsoft used to do a similar thing as people we old learn some one was an employee and ask questions. That employee may honestly not know or they may just be in a hurry (trying to walk into a movie) so they could provide a card which gave the person one free support incident.

    12. Re:Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably not BS, this is an old trick: GM used to do this all the time. By policy, GM executives had to drive GM shitboxes, and when their GM shitbox inevitably fucked up, the execs just dropped it off at a garage for set up for GM execs only and then they drove away in another, new, non-lemon shitbox. They never had to suffer the consequences of bad design and engineering, in fact, their cars were always fine, so "What's YOUR problem?"

      This technique is a perfect way to hide problems from those who matter, either inside or outside a company. Why would Senators and other VIPs believe Comcast service is as totally broken as we know it to be since they never get the bad service? Instead they just assume other people are malcontents and fools...

    13. Re:Right... by IcyWolfy · · Score: 1

      These cards have been around for at least the last 4 years.
      They get mailed out to your home address.
      Employees only, not contractors.

      The cards are for residential support (business is separate)
      The cards give a gateway-blocked phone number that requests your card ID.
      And then dumps you into tier 2; Usually into Res-Internet.

    14. Re:Right... by IcyWolfy · · Score: 1

      Full Time Employees only, not contractors.

    15. Re:Right... by silfen · · Score: 1

      As for your conduit/pole renting scheme - that might work. But I suspect what would happen is that the existing monopolist would make clear that they'd be selling their deployed lines at more than the cost to deploy all new lines, severely disincentivizing any competing bids

      No, obviously that's not how it should work. The way it should work is that if someone gets outbid, they are responsible for removing their wires unless someone takes them on.

      Private easements through people's back yards are probably a non-starter, especially for power - one of the reasons lines run down streets is because of ease of maintenance and relative safety in case of damage - a power line downed in the street is far less likely to start neighborhood threatening fires than one in your back yard. Underground conduit would be less of an issue though.

      I have power running through my backyard. Easements for underground cables are common.

    16. Re:Right... by thunderclap · · Score: 1

      Actually the root problem is most people don't own property. Those that do don't understand the rights that come with owning that piece of land.

    17. Re: Right... by therealobsideus · · Score: 1

      I worked for Comcast at one point, and everyone gets the cards (only a limited number) and you do go to a higher support agent when calling in.

    18. Re: Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure it's "every employee [not hired through contracting firms or outsourcing agencies]"

    19. Re:Right... by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      "Personally I think a better way to handle such natural monopolies might be to separate infrastructure from service: There's one power line company, one dataline company, one waterline company, etc"

      As long as FRAND-type rules are enforced, this does work. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      This was effectively forcibly spun out of the incumbent telco(*)(**) after 2 decades of predatory/monopolist behaviour and effectively transformed New Zealand out of the "Hostile telecommunications environment" that's put off business activity for years (foreign companies wouldn't invest in NZ if they needed big infrastructure and local ones would move out of the country once they got to any decent size)

      One of the first effects has been that access to all the ducts in the ground are now being leased out to cable companies and telcos which in the past were direct competitors to the incumbent and therefore refused access. You can get dark fibre now too, which was previously impossible.

      The result has been a minor revolution in the New Zealand market. Service is now what matters, not who has the loudest voice or shiniest adverts.

      If you analyse the USA market, AT&T has almost completed reassembling itself, minus that pesky "universal service" obligation and managed to cement a tighter monopoly on lineside while they were at it. It takes regulators with some cajones to break this trend.

      (*) When the incumbent was turned into a state-run company (previously a govt department) it was split into 7 regional operating companies and 1 mobile company, baby-bell style. Within 24 months of them being sold off to Ameritech+Bell Atlantic it had reassembled itself Borg-style and proceeded to rape/pillage on price and access for 20 years, even after the Bells quit their shareholding.

      (**) The incumbent was forced to provide LLU and given targets to hit. They didn't and were clearly dragging their feet. After divesting the lines company, those LLU targets were hit extremely quickly because the new company didn't just provide LLU, it actively went out and sought LLU customers - and THAT is the lesson to be taken home about the difference between forcing the incumbent to provide LLU (even as a separate business unit) and cleaving the lines side off into its own separate company without shared management.

    20. Re:Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to consider the volume of calls arriving in queue every minute, then compare with the number of cards printed, and the smaller number of cards actually given out.

      I imagine it's pretty easy to hand out thousands of these cards, tens of thousands even, and still provide 'priority' assistance. It's still only a fraction of a percent of customers, so it's unnoticeable to the vast majority (99+%) of people stuck in phone hell. Especially when you consider Comcast is able to provide priority assistance by removing resources from 'regular' assistance.

      Sucka.

    21. Re:Right... by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      As a Kiwi myself, I feel pretty good about our telecommunications infrastructure when I compare it to the US, and I've been trying to explain the concepts of what's been going on in NZ to Americans since I got here. It's rare to find people here who understand that it is in fact a good thing (AT&T, Verizon, Comcast etc would actually have to compete for your business!!) and the counter-arguments are always about profits (HOW WOULD $COMPANY MAKE ANY MONEY!?) or "incentive to upgrade" -- whatever that's supposed to mean. Then I get pointed at things like Akamai's quarterly SOTI report or rankings on Ookla with silly comparisons like "at least we're better than Mongolia" or something.

      They just don't get that maintaining/upgrading the infrastructure is the sole job of the infrastructure company, and that it would be prudent for that infrastructure company to keep up with the technology. They just don't get that since NZers now have 30 or 40 retail ISPs to choose from, irrespective of their address, it's difficult for ISPs to abuse their customers the same way customers get abused in the US, and we can get prices similar to or sometimes cheaper than services in the US and far far superior quality of service without all the gimmicks and special offers of only $20 per month (which then jumps to like $80 per month after some period of time) and not to mention the difficulty of actually finding the damn price on the ISP's website in the first place (which will be advertised exclusive of taxes and local fees, of course).

      That being said, there is a VISP market in the US, but it's a bitch: the difference in price between wholesale and retail is often miniscule or even negative (eg wholesale account costs VISP $50/month while the customer can get it direct for $45 or something stupid like that), so I'm not completely certain how well it works.

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
  2. Gregory was just not interesting on the show by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    And it's not like NBC killed the show. They just changed hosts.

    I don't see how that amounts to Comcast wrecking NBC's ability to do real news.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:Gregory was just not interesting on the show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it's not like NBC killed the show. They just changed hosts.

      I don't see how that amounts to Comcast wrecking NBC's ability to do real news.

      Gregory is a great host and a wonderful person. It was extremely unfair to replace him. No matter, he will move on to bigger and better things.

    2. Re:Gregory was just not interesting on the show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doubt it, unless he goes to the UK or another country. The US is fed up with DNC shills who lie on the news, or bury stories. Piers Morgan found that out, now Gregory found this out. The "mainstream media" news is not mainstream, it is extremists views shared only by a small minority. They want to be the majority, but have failed at their job so horribly over the last 10 years they have lost their audience and are not likely to get them back.

      Perhaps if he spent more time explaining how the ATF is responsible for the killing of HUNDREDS of Mexicans instead of committing firearm felonies on TV to promote an anti-gun stance he might have some credibility. But when you bury a story because it doesn't fit your narrative, you fail as a news anchor and deserve to lose your job.

    3. Re:Gregory was just not interesting on the show by Immerman · · Score: 0

      I agree. I can't wait for Fox News to be taken off the air.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    4. Re:Gregory was just not interesting on the show by MrNJ · · Score: 1

      It's not ON the air, genius. Unlike NBC and such.

      --
      I don't respond to or upvote ACs
    5. Re:Gregory was just not interesting on the show by silfen · · Score: 1

      I agree. I can't wait for Fox News to be taken off the air.

      Your inner fascist is showing: you don't like it, it needs "to be taken off the air".

    6. Re:Gregory was just not interesting on the show by Immerman · · Score: 1

      No, I'm just following ACs lead - if we should fire newscasters for burying a story because it doesn't fit their narrative, then what should we do to "news" stations that knowingly lie to their viewers on a regular basis, and have even successfully argued in court that FCC policies against intentionally lying in the news are only non-binding "guidelines"?

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    7. Re:Gregory was just not interesting on the show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CBS, NBC, and ABC have a far worse record and its provable. Just because you don't like facts doesn't change reality.

      Anyways, the FCC regulates CBS, NBC, and ABC but has no say whatsoever over Fox News on cable. So not sure what you mean about FCC policies they had to argue against in court. I did find this snopes thing which you might be referring to which says your claim is false.

      So not only are you wrong, you are wrong at every possible level and you probably knowingly lied to try and make your point. Like I said before, if a liberal makes a claim, look it up and find the lie. It usually takes less than 5 minutes.

    8. Re:Gregory was just not interesting on the show by Immerman · · Score: 2

      Perhaps I'm out of touch - last time I watched broadcast TV Fox News was one of the major players.

      And did I say anything about the relative merits of other "news" stations? I simply chose the station that I suspected was one of AC's preffered disinformation channels.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    9. Re:Gregory was just not interesting on the show by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      The distinction the AC is trying to make that you seem to be missing is:

      Broadcast runs over radio waves
      Cable runs over a coax cable from a cable company.

      Fox and CNN are cable news, ABC, CBS and NBC are broadcast news. The two categories are regulated in a different manner, for instance, cursing and nudity are banned things on broadcast, but are allowed on cable (at least certain classes of cable, which is where HBO, Cinimax, etc comes from).

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    10. Re:Gregory was just not interesting on the show by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      On another note, Fox news only has a lying issue in the opinion section, which is because it allows people to spout off whatever opinion they have. The opinion section even allows liberals to speak! This is why they were able to get out of the lawsuit, as the person who said something provably untrue was speaking their own opinion, and it was made clear that it was opinion at the time.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    11. Re:Gregory was just not interesting on the show by silfen · · Score: 1

      No, I'm just following ACs lead - if we should fire newscasters for burying a story

      Who is this "we" you are talking about? You don't get to "fire newscasters" (unless you own the TV station) nor do I. You get to choose not to watch them, that's all.

      then what should we do to "news" stations that knowingly lie to their viewers on a regular basis,

      Same thing: you can choose not to watch it, that's all you, I, or "we" get to do.

      and have even successfully argued in court that FCC policies against intentionally lying in the news are only non-binding "guidelines"

      Good! The government has no business determining what constitutes a lie and what constitutes truth in the media.

  3. Bloody Innovative by skegg · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Disgusting, but very innovative way to generate a reality-distortion field around their true customer service.

    1. Re:Bloody Innovative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The airlines are way ahead of Comcast. They've maintained lists of important people they want to keep happy since time immemorial. Their systems automatically flag VIPs' reservations so employees know to give influential people special treatment.

      Slashdot protip: If you want airlines to stop treating you like an animal, change your name to a famous person's name.

    2. Re:Bloody Innovative by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 4, Funny

      We can call it the "Comcast Support Fast-Lane"

    3. Re:Bloody Innovative by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      The real customers are the big wigs. The average subscriber are just income source.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:Bloody Innovative by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Notably Hollywood people, lest one appear on a talk show and casually drop the terrible service they received on airline X, costing the company millions.

      There was a pregnant woman in Detroit who, while boarding a plane, was shoved violently aside by such an airline goon, striving to get to the Hollywood person aboard already to serve them. As it turns out, the pregnant woman happened to be a columnist for the Detroit Free Press.

      It didn't go so well for the airline.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    5. Re:Bloody Innovative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for that. We all know there are some that automatically skip to the head of the line/que in many aspects of life, and it would not surprise me even in this mundane way as well. The other day while getting a $.05/gallon discount on gas because of some promotion I thought, in fact, just what IS the price of gasoline? For most, likely the price on the placard. But for many it may be much, much lower, maybe even free. In the old cash and credit card society days this would be (more) difficult to implement. On a further faniciful thought, when expensive flying cars come along and necessary highways are relegated to the poor and the trucks, will only the poor pay for it? Who will pay for all the newfound traffic control and airport "upgrades"? The point is, this is a trend, and going to get much worse - I wonder if everything will be tiered.

  4. Ob XKCD by plover · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I hope the secret code is 'shibboleet'.

    --
    John
    1. Re:Ob XKCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's wonderful, what's a "shibboleet"?

    2. Re:Ob XKCD by ihtoit · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Andrews & Arnold Ltd (also known as AAISP) is an Internet service provider based in Bracknell in the United Kingdom founded in 1997 and launched in 1998, primarily serving businesses and "technical" home users.

      In 2009 the company was judged the best niche provider in the Thinkbroadband Customer Service Awards, based on customer ratings and again in 2010.

      The company's owner, Adrian Kennard (RevK), stated in a blog post that as of October 2010 the company is "XKCD/806" compliant, referring to XKCD comic number 806. This means that technical support callers who say the code word "shibboleet" will be transferred to a technical support representative who knows at least two programming languages, and presumably can offer more useful advice than a standard tech support script.
      Andrews & Arnold is one of the rare ISPs in the United Kingdom to provide IPv6 to home customers, for free.

      Andrews & Arnold are strong advocates of not censoring Internet connections. Adrian Kennard has several blog postings discussing why Internet censorship as discussed in the UK is not workable, providing background for AAISP's decision.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    3. Re:Ob XKCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this explains the word and why: http://www.csmonitor.com/Innov...

    4. Re:Ob XKCD by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      "Andrews & Arnold Ltd". Sounds more like a haberdasher than an ISP. I love it! Companies seem to be struggling to come up with good names; the trend here is to use a common word with a Q or Z added somewhere, or they just pick a vaguely Latin sounding but fully anonymous and forgettable name. Nothing wrong with just using the names of the founders.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    5. Re:Ob XKCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    6. Re:Ob XKCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, that the advert, and self-selecting customer survey awards are worthless.

      Now let's look at the home service: 100GB download / £25 month. That's pathetic.

    7. Re:Ob XKCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you want cheap bandwidth and shit service, you can go to BT or whoever. Fuck off.

    8. Re:Ob XKCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You needed the explanation? You need to get out more.

    9. Re:Ob XKCD by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I wish I could use A&A, but unfortunately they are stuck with BT's crappy network which doesn't work where I live.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re:Ob XKCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They also use TalkTalk's network. A&A are ridiculously expensive on bandwidth charges.

    11. Re:Ob XKCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's wonderful, what's a "shibboleet"?

      Just say "shibboleth" out loud while on the phone to the rep. If you pronounce it right, you get good service. If not, you obviously aren't deserving of good service.

      If you're seriously asking, AC, it was a word whose pronunciation varied subtly between two neighboring cultures. Not like "axe/ask" for African-Americans or "rike/like" for Japanese/English, more like "roof/roof" (which can be pronounced "rooooph" or "rough" depending on where your parents grew up, regardless of their ethnicity.) An online equivalent would be that if I snark about Natalie Portman and hot grits, and you make a remark about petrification, we can know that we're both Slashdotters.

    12. Re:Ob XKCD by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      A&A are extremely good, but they're also expensive (I move 3-4TB/month).

      If anyone actually needed to say shibboleet to them I'd be extremely surprised.

  5. Microsoft has free support cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As a consultant you get a couple of free paid solution cards every quarter if you ask for them and regular employees could if they know who to ask. Support cards are common with all big lumbering evil companies and is actually pretty non-evil. Now the fact they have a special line to provide 'better' service is kind of evil, but having called them about 5 times with a 20+minute wait and incredibly painful slow explanations of the obvious to correct billing with escalations and 2 times to cancel with escalations. It makes sense that they have a team that actually helps instead of trying to get you to accept being over billed or not to cancel.

    1. Re:Microsoft has free support cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So they basically admit that their support system sucks donkey balls and that they have the ability to fix it. But they don't want to. At least not for everybody. So they just do it for some people. Nice! Why does these companies still exist again?

    2. Re:Microsoft has free support cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regular employees used to get them during orientation five years ago. Not sure if that's still the case.

    3. Re:Microsoft has free support cards by DrXym · · Score: 2

      I bet lots of companies do it - sign up for their most expensive credit card, or phone plan, or cable package and the number you call prioritizes you in the queue. The reason of course is simple - they care more about keeping the cash cows happy more than the scum signed up on the basic package.

    4. Re:Microsoft has free support cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a consultant you get a couple of free paid solution cards every quarter if you ask for them and regular employees could if they know who to ask. Support cards are common with all big lumbering evil companies and is actually pretty non-evil. Now the fact they have a special line to provide 'better' service is kind of evil, but having called them about 5 times with a 20+minute wait and incredibly painful slow explanations of the obvious to correct billing with escalations and 2 times to cancel with escalations. It makes sense that they have a team that actually helps instead of trying to get you to accept being over billed or not to cancel.

      That's really something. I've never seen anyone actually go to Microsoft for support, except maybe to read articles that hint at the problem. It's funny, I always get crap from management about Linux not have any support, yet when something goes wrong with a Windows server or workstation, that same manage doesn't seem to mind taking the advice of a 14 year-old blogger who asks him to change registry settings. Nope. Never seen a problem anyone call Microsoft. They must because bug fixes happen. But I've not seen it first hand.

    5. Re:Microsoft has free support cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they *really* need the support, Microsoft has their Premiere Support and other enterprise offerings. If you want good, authoritative investigations and answers to your problems, it is available for a non-trivial price. My current employer has one. You even get an account manager who will find the right people for you if the initial callback is not terribly helpful.

      I suspect the people you refer to are simply looking for the cheapest fix, which means dime-a-dozen MCPs spending half their time on google. Some businesses can get away with that level of support.

    6. Re:Microsoft has free support cards by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      Well yeah, in a case like that, I kind of would expect better service depending on the circumstances.

      The same doesn't got for every product/service, of course, but if the product/service I'm buying specifically offers me a higher level of service than the average joe, I should damn well get it.

      For example, I would be a bit miffed if an AAA classic member got priority (or better benefits) than me as an AAA premier tier - after all, I paid for premier for a reason, damnit. Similarly, if I talk business class or dedicated Internet over residential, that probably comes with some form of elevated level of customer service, so why shouldn't I get priority if that's what I'm paying for?

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
  6. isn't that the taste of the internet fast lane? by crispytwo · · Score: 2

    You get service if you have a card, otherwise you are to use the oh-so-helpful forums.
    Oh wait, you have to have working internet before you can get there! Better hope you have a card!

    1. Re:isn't that the taste of the internet fast lane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of a Userfriendly.org comic.

      Greg he help desk took a customer call
      Customer lost the email password.

      Greg emailed it to the customer.. ;-)

  7. Also committed various gun felonies on TV too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    He was never prosecuted, because he is anti-gun. However, he possessed a high capacity magazine in DC. Doing it on TV he should have been arrested immediately after and maybe allowed to negotiate a low jail term and fine. However, he was never even charged much less prosecuted. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/08/david-gregory-prosecution-magazine-clip-angry-response_n_2648295.html.

    1. Re:Also committed various gun felonies on TV too by khallow · · Score: 1

      Doing it on TV he should have been arrested immediately after and maybe allowed to negotiate a low jail term and fine.

      Against a well-funded defense? More likely, the law would have been ruled unconstitutional.

    2. Re:Also committed various gun felonies on TV too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I watch the President of the United States wave a bag of crack cocaine he asked his underlings to buy for home so he could show it on TV. That's a pretty serious crime, but no one even questioned if he should have been removed from office.

    3. Re:Also committed various gun felonies on TV too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That bag of crack explained a lot of the nonsense passing for policy that floated out of that White House for a while afterwards...

  8. All legal, too. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    The cards may also be used to fast track money from Comcast's other customers straight into the pockets of the politician.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  9. Tex Cobb VIP card says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ben Dover

  10. Card hmmmm by EuclideanSilence · · Score: 1

    Has anyone gotten a card that keeps your internet connection running without interruptions and at advertised capacity? I'd also like a card that makes them lower their prices to the level that they would be at if they weren't selling a monopoly utility. Thanks~~

    1. Re:Card hmmmm by EuclideanSilence · · Score: 2

      Hmm, actually I may have though of one. Maybe this card will do it?

  11. I Read it on the IntardWebz.... by jvp · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...and therefore, it must be true.

    Yes, every employee is given these cards, but no they do nothing to "fast track" support. What they do is help a customer get more help and final resolution to issues that they typical tier 1 and 2 tech support can't help with. It is an admission that their tech support sucks, but it's not some special pass to get a customer something they don't otherwise deserve. Nor are they used for bribery purposes.

    Basically, the original story is full of shit. But that's not terribly surprising around here, sometimes.

    For the record, I'm a former Comcast employee and am not in any way defending their practices.

    --
    Jason Van Patten
    1. Re:I Read it on the IntardWebz.... by NicBenjamin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If used properly they should probably be given to newish customers who have a difficult problem the front-line support guys will need to escalate to Tier 2 anyway. But these ones were being handed out to important people solely because those people are important, so I'd say they're by definition being used for "bribery purposes."

      The bribe here isn't in the fact that Rep. Jackass and Sen. Blowhard have actually been given something great normal people don't have access to, it's that Jackass and Blowhard think they've been given access to something great normal people don't have. That's a hell of an ego boost, and it'll make those two guys a lot more sympathetic to the guy who handed them the card. In many ways it's the ideal bribe -- in monetary terms it's worth virtually nothing (maybe $10), but it's recipients probably think it's worth a lot because they think it will allow them to totally bypass the most hated customer service system in the country.

    2. Re:I Read it on the IntardWebz.... by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      > What they do is help a customer get more help and final resolution to issues that they typical tier 1 and 2 tech support can't help with.

      Since the Tier 1 and Tier 2 guys are are typically useless, this is, in fact, fast tracking support calls. Once it hists the Tier 1 or Tier 2, they're not going to bounce it back down to Tier 1 to walk through all the menus of irrelvavant support questions again.

      I'm afraid the idea. that starting out with the Tier 3 support personnel is not fast tracking such a support call is disingenuous.

    3. Re:I Read it on the IntardWebz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is an admission that their tech support sucks,.

      This.

      Anyone who is paying for internet service and that's just about everyone should be able to expect that it just works. If it's not working, it's usually a problem on the ISP's end. The people I have spoken to never seem to have a clue what to do other than tell you to reboot everything. Yeah, I already did that before I called you because I knew that would be the first thing you tell me to do. It didn't help.

      I'm not a networking expert, but I find it hard to believe that they can't tell when part of Comcast's network just goes down.

      And when a Comcast employee comes to my home and tells me "I just came from a customer with the same problem and it's happening at my house too" it's obvious that they are fucking us up the ass. I don't blame the tech support or the people who come out to my house to research problems. Their hands are tied. They can't do shit other than make sure all the wires are hooked up and your modem wasn't pissed on by the cat or something.

    4. Re:I Read it on the IntardWebz.... by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      "Once it hists the Tier 1 or Tier 2, they're not going to bounce it back down to Tier 1 to walk through all the menus of irrelvavant support questions again."

      I can think of (and have experienced) outfits where they do just that.

    5. Re:I Read it on the IntardWebz.... by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry for the typos, my hands are acting up. I'm afraid that "Once it hits the Tier 2 or Tier 3, they're not going to bounce it back down to Tier 1 to walk through all the the irrelevant support questions again" was what I meant to say.

      I'm a bit surprised you've encountered Tier 2 or Tier 3 who bounce it back. The approach I tend to use, and which I encourage others to use, is that "when it hits Tier 2, bring the Tier 1 staffperson over and train them", or have them help rewrite the scripted responses to get a script that covers the edge cases. And ideally, if it hits Tier 3, they do the same thing with the tier 2 staff.

      I'll also note that I'm working with smaller groups than Comcast's customer support center, but the technique works very well for improving the responses, and spreading knowledge downstream and upstream about common problems and their workable solutions. The cross-training is invaluable.

    6. Re:I Read it on the IntardWebz.... by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      "I'm a bit surprised you've encountered Tier 2 or Tier 3 who bounce it back."

      The ISPs in question are all UK-based:

      Talktalk
      British Telecom
      Orange.

      Unsurprisingly they're the ISPs with the largest advertising budgets AND bottom of customer satisfaction stakes.

      Whilst the UK has LLU, the reality is that the "big 7" ISPs are all awful and people aren't really aware there are alternatives.

      Additionally they've been heavily sold ISP-based email addreses which act as "lockin" devices. They don't seem to realise they can trivially setup a freemail account and direct all their friends to that.

    7. Re:I Read it on the IntardWebz.... by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Oh, my. I can see where British IT can have its own special influence on any sampling of customer service policies. I'm afraid the movie "Brazil" is particularly meaningful to those of us who've worked with British Telecom as partners or as clients.

  12. It's great! by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 2

    Important people get preferential treatment all the time. I've got a nice chunk of change stored at my bank. Ever since I put it there, my customer service calls have been diverted directly to Executive Customer Service. I don't even have to do anything. My phone number is linked to my account so my calls go straight there, picked up by Frank or Veronica in Texas before the third ring. I rarely need to call them but it's nice not to sit in a queue like a schmuck listening to hold music warble in and out.

    And what's the deal with hold music? Why is it always distorted and fading in and out? Shouldn't we be able to fix that by now?

    1. Re:It's great! by wbr1 · · Score: 2

      It is distorted and fading in and out because somewhere (perhaps multiple somewheres) along its path it is being compressed with a lossy compression designed for human vocal ranges and not muzak. When the system was mostly analog, this did not happen, however high and low frequencies were cut, resulting in a tin-cannish sound if you listened for it.

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    2. Re:It's great! by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      I know the difference between compression and sound disappearing then coming back. And compression doesn't create warbly flanging effects. :rolleyes:

    3. Re:It's great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know the difference between compression and sound disappearing then coming back. And compression doesn't create warbly flanging effects. :rolleyes:

      Apparently you don't, since that's what it is. "lossy compression designed for human vocal ranges and not muzak" not fucking mp3.

    4. Re:It's great! by wbr1 · · Score: 1

      This is not your run of the mill ogg or mp3 codec. These codecs are typically VBR (variable bit rate), this means that the level of compression varies based on what the codec and network conditions dictate. If you swing the bitrate enough you WILL hear changes in volume and quality that sound like a flanging effect.
      http://www.voiceage.com/Audio-...
      http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/...
      You can :rolleyes: when you know more than just bb smiley code. Until then, hand in your geek creds please.

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
  13. To hide the bad service regular people get? by Roodvlees · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So they know their service is crappy. But instead of improving it, which would require actual work, they hide it from the people who make decisions. Every person that accepts one of these cards and does not put it online for public use is corrupt. But I guess being corrupt is normal in the US.

    --
    Thank you, Bradley Manning, Edward Snowden and so many others, for courageously defending humanity, my freedom and more!
    1. Re:To hide the bad service regular people get? by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So they know their service is crappy. But instead of improving it, which would require actual work, they hide it from the people who make decisions. Every person that accepts one of these cards and does not put it online for public use is corrupt. But I guess being corrupt is normal in the US.

      I spent 10-15 hair-pulling minutes yesterday with my 71 year old stepfather (whom I otherwise love dearly) as I, well, let me start from the beginning.

      He called and said "We've broken flash on both Macs and can't watch youtube videos now. I've installed it twice on your mom's Mac but it didn't help."

      So, I explained that 1) they didn't break anything, flash quits working automatically when it's outdated and waits for you to update it and 2) he didn't "install" it, he merely downloaded it and these two actions are not the same thing.

      He apparently couldn't figure out where to download it from and I didn't want him to wander to some web site that would purport to give him flash while giving him something else so I sent him the official link from Adobe. So he went to that link.

      I did, too, just so I would know what he would see. I asked if it popped up the box about downloading flash and he assured me that it didn't. He started getting frustrated around this point. (Note that it actually had downloaded and he hadn't paid attention to what he clicked). It was here that he claimed that his only option was to pay $9.99/month for "something called PS and LR - I have no idea what that is" (it's "Photoshop and Light Room" for those wondering).

      I'll spare you some pain and just say that he finally found the download, which is in some popup thing on the dock at the bottom. He couldn't figure out how to open it and claimed that when he clicked it it wouldn't do anything. I tried to get him to drag it to the desktop but it finally just opened. I doubt he clicked on it the first 10 times he claimed that he did.

      Now, at this point he is looking at the installer for the easiest piece of software in the world to install. He cannot proceed as there is no option to proceed. I ask him to tell me what he sees and (it's different than mine - no idea why - maybe because I have Yosemite) he says something about some license and there's a quit button. Oh, wait, there's an install button but it's black and I can't use it. So he clicks "quit" and says "well, it went away and isn't doing anything".

      I asked him what he did and he said "I clicked the quit button, I couldn't do anything else and that doesn't seem to be doing anything".

      I convince him to open it back up. I tell him there has to be something else to click. Then he says "there's a bunch of stuff!". I ask him if the browser is open and he replies "well, I don't know but there's a bunch of stuff." I suspect that he's clicked on the license stuff and it's showing it in a browser and he then begins reading the section headings for the license. I tell him "you're in the browser, you need to close it" but he's frustrated and pissed at this point so he begins talking louder over me as he continues to read section headings and then starts to tell me the url. I tell him again "you're in the browser and need to close it" and he finally listens and closes it.

      At this point my blood pressure is "high over dangerous". He's back at the window where he can only quit. I ask him "isn't there a box to check to say you've agreed to their license?" and he finally says "oh, yeah" and clicks it and then "I can click install now". I actually expect it to not work but he clicks it and it works.

      I cannot get my 10 minutes back.

      Imagine that over and over and over and over again for 8 hours.

      It doesn't make sense for Comcast to put experienced tech support people on the front lines because dealing with crap like that doesn't require a lot of knowledge. Comcast has a pretty good monitoring system and they know when their stuff isn't working 99% of the time. Most of their calls are probably

    2. Re:To hide the bad service regular people get? by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

      He called and said "We've broken flash on both Macs and can't watch youtube videos now. I've installed it twice on your mom's Mac but it didn't help."

      Could be a lot worse. I emailed my mom a screenshot and she replied, "How did you do that?" I wrote back saying, "I have a Mac and don't know how to do it on a PC like you have, but if you Google 'windows screenshot' you'll find something that will tell you." Two days later I get a call: "I did what you said and now my computer runs slow and has all these strange windows and icons everywhere and my email doesn't work." "What did you do, mom?" "I Googled what you said. Then one of those sites told me my computer had a virus and I clicked a button to clean it."

      This was my mom so I helped her, but this is a good example of why I'd rather have burning bamboo shoved underneath my fingernails than work tier 1 tech support.

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
  14. Story is BS. Make it Right cards aren't that big. by IcyWolfy · · Score: 5, Informative

    The story is BS.
    Every employee at Comcast gets 3 cards a year.
    The idea is that if you see or hear someone who's having a problem, you can give them a card and they get a better experience.

    The number on the card is a single use number. Thus, once used, it's tied to a specific account/issue, and can never be used again.
    Second, it's only good for Residential services (Business services have separate support numbers and staff)
    Third, it only bypasses Tier 1 customer support (newly hired users, who are still trying to figure out all the tools, and the problems,; once you're competent enough on enough systems, you can be promoted to Tier 2.)
    Thus, if you want the same situation, call in to comcast, and immediate ask to speak to their supervision or a Tier 2 rep; or simply BS that your call was dropped while the issue was being escalated, etc.

    Fourth, only a small number of employees actually use the cards. There was a drive to try to convince staff to jus give them out to anybody with a problem; even to friends of friends, or to strangers on the train talking about comcast. Just get them out there.

    As the cards are basically tied into the Residential Support system, it doesn't help with Retentions, Service Cancellation, or other non Technical issues with your service. Not sure about billing.

    I know when I was at Comcast, I didn't use my cards on friends. Someone complained on twitter about their comcast service, I gave them one of my cards. I gave one to a women I met on a flight; and the last I just lost.

    Friends I would direct to call and tell them which keywords to use about their problem so that custrep can find the issue and fix it. (since they're basicaly just using a search engine to try to find out which of the 100,000s of issues your symtoms could match to; which leads to basically hundreds of questions to try to narrow it down, if they haven't experienced your particual problem before)

  15. Right... by nbauman · · Score: 2

    Verizon in NYC had a similar help line escalation.

    When I moved to a new apartment, and switched my phone, it didn't work and they couldn't get it working for a month. (Probably because they were trying to get rid of their land lines in favor of fiber optic, so they let their twisted pair maintenance crew decline.)

    I was dealing with the usual tech support hell (on hold for half an hour, transferred call and dropped, supervisors who promised to return my call and never did, etc.).

    Finally I called somebody by mistake in Staten Island who gave me the number of the "President's hot line". I called them up, got somebody who was actually helpful, made some calls for me, and got it working again. (Apparently their digital switches were malprogrammed. Give me the old solenoids back.)

    A while later I was having trouble again so I called the President's hot line again. It wasn't working any more.

    (Pro tip: When I really got fed up, I called my state assemblyman, Dick Gottfried, on the theory that Verizon is regulated by and accountable to the State. One of his staffers called Verizon, and straightened it out, even though it was Friday evening before the weekend.

    So maybe that's the kind of thing that was going on with Comcast. If the service is federally regulated, your congressman should be able to call them up in your behalf and hold them accountable. And they can do it for themselves. I don't think it's outrageous for a politician to get that favor as long as they use it for their constituents too.)

    * * *
    I like copper wire. So sue me.

  16. The cards they do nothing by ourlovecanlastforeve · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hi, former Comcast support representative here.

    Those cards do nothing, they're just placebos.

    You dial the support number and punch in the code, and the switch drops you right into the same queue with everyone else.

    At the call center we called them "idiot cards" because you'd have to be one to think they were any benefit to you.

    We usually handed them out ironically to the least deserving customers.

    1. Re:The cards they do nothing by wbr1 · · Score: 2

      The cards may do nothing, but they ARE a placebo. And being used to influence the idiots who have the power to stop abusive and monopolistic behavior. Therefore they DO have a use, and not a good one.

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    2. Re:The cards they do nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, former Comcast support representative here.

      Those cards do nothing, they're just placebos.

      You dial the support number and punch in the code, and the switch drops you right into the same queue with everyone else.

      At the call center we called them "idiot cards" because you'd have to be one to think they were any benefit to you.

      We usually handed them out ironically to the least deserving customers.

      I liked Dell's approach better. You had to go through the usual phone menu Hell to get to support, but once there, they'd give you a direct 800 number so if you needed frequent assistance you could bypass the menu nonsense.

      That was when support meant Round Rock, though. Before they thought they could offshore it all.

    3. Re:The cards they do nothing by McGruber · · Score: 1

      At the call center we called them "idiot cards" because you'd have to be one to think they were any benefit to you.

      "Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress; but I repeat myself." - Mark Twain

  17. same card? by kqc7011 · · Score: 1

    We need to see if there is any difference between the cards that are given to regular workers to hand out and the cards that the government-affairs team hands out. No difference, no problem. Difference, problem.

    --
    Passionately Indifferent
  18. Politics as usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To me it looks like politics as usual and just proves neither Democrat's or Republican's have a exclusive on being in the pockets of big business. Anyone who is dumb enough to actually think government changes because their political party favorite is in office is not looking at what just happened with the last recession.
    Wall Street and banks totally crushed and yet they are all doing fine today. Even Fannie and Freddie talk about another teaser low down payment again which brought us into the last housing bubble. Gee, do we ever learn? Yet, has anyone in government even made a real effort to help main street? Nope, and the reason is simple. Main street does not have lobbyists or special interest groups feeding the politicians and most politicians go into offices not to service the public. But to create a elitist stature while in office to live happily ever after. The true example of this is simply that government is broken except when business wants something.
    Comcast wants to grow, and so while government makes them jump through a few hoops, they eventually will get what they want. Not, for the benefit of consumers as many politicians will argue. But at the benefit of business of which politicians are indebted too.

  19. Re:Story is BS. Make it Right cards aren't that bi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This also makes this community look really uninformed. The first sight of anything about Comcast and people just start saying random bullshit. Now when the lobbyists are presented with material that's anti Time Warner/Comcast merger, they just say, "see look, they're all emotional knee-jerks".

  20. Re:Story is BS. Make it Right cards aren't that bi by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    Many companies do this kind of thing, which leads me to a question for you. Are you sure there wasn't a separate tier, one that not every employee got cards for? My own company does this to us...we outsourced our IT a few years back, and now if you call and tell them you're from a certain location, you get your hand held, and a blow job, while your machine is fixed.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  21. Re:Joke by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

    There's no such thing as "too soon" for a joke, but you can bet your ass there's such a thing as "too shit".

  22. It's true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Everyone has them. And anyone can receive them. A friend got one after he had 3 technicians come to his house to diagnose a weak TV signal. My company got one after our first call for a modem that was dropping packets. There's no conspiracy here. It's actually Comcast trying to do something nice.

  23. No they are not by morgauxo · · Score: 1

    The cards are not handed out to EVERY Comcast employee. I used to be one, my wife is one and I know several. Never seen a card.

  24. Re:Story is BS. Make it Right cards aren't that bi by tom.rake · · Score: 1

    Perception counts a lot in politics. The big deal is IF the Comcast lobby staff handed out more than the "3 cards a year" with intent to influence. Said another way Comcast is calling the majority of it's customers peons.

  25. Would one of these cards... by Bruinwar · · Score: 1

    Would one of these cards fix my billing errors? We just changed our service to a better & cheaper plan holding the "change to another provider club" over their head. It helps a little but we still pay too much IMO. They came in with the new X1 boxes with a new DVR & gateway & all installed by a typical cable guy. Internet lasted a few hours & started failing. I figured it was a bad box, went to a center & changed it out to a non-X1 gateway & it worked. 6 days later a new tech comes & adds a amplifier so the X1 box would work. Long story longer, they charged us for the installation & service call.

    After a long talk with the CS guy, they promise to fix it on the next statement. Yeah OK, yep heard that before. Fucking Comcrap! My very long history of problems with them could fill a notebook. My current alternative is Uverse.... oh god no.

    The new X1 UI? Comcrap finally updated their UI that was pretty much the same since the 1980s. It's shit, nothing like intuitive, but it's an improvement. I don't know who they get to design these things but they might wanna run it by some focus groups now & then to see how usable it is.

    --
    SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT
  26. Re:Story is BS. Make it Right cards aren't that bi by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    you get your hand held, and a blow job, while your machine is fixed

    Wow, where do I get one of those cards?

    My machine would constantly be broken. ;-)

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  27. Monkeyboy should have never been the host by cat_jesus · · Score: 2

    Monkeyboy(David Gregory) was a horrible host of Meet the Press. Chuck Todd isn't an improvement. The entire show is just a group handjob.

  28. Re:Story is BS. Make it Right cards aren't that bi by T.E.D. · · Score: 2

    I honestly don't see your clarification as any better. If people are encouraged to hand those cards out sort of as a perk for knowing someone who works there, what exactly is that saying about your company's Tier 1 service? If not having to go through that layer is a special favor, then clearly even the company is acknowledging that it is an unpleasant experience for the poor sucke--er--customers stuck using it.

  29. Re:Story is BS. Make it Right cards aren't that bi by Bigbutt · · Score: 2

    You wouldn't like it. Sometimes the guys don't shave. :D

    [John]

    --
    Shit better not happen!
  30. What's to review? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article says the FCC and FTC are reviewing the proposed merger to decide what to do.

    What's to review?

    Just say no.

    ps, The card thing is a good story, because it amplifies the idea that there is a disconnect between inside and outside the beltway.
    Even if the card story is a hoax, the disconnect is pretty real.
    Hopefully, the FCC and FTC will be a little more connected with their decision.
    It's really hard to see how the merger can be a good thing.

  31. An ISP Fast lane you say? by grilled-cheese · · Score: 1

    So what you're saying is that an ISP is creating a "fast lane". I'm sure that this is for everyone's benefit, and will continue to encourage them to increase their overall support capacity while ignoring the monetization/influence effects it might have.

  32. Re:Story is BS. Make it Right cards aren't that bi by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

    The entire premise is wrong. Why should some customers have a secret handshake that grants them reasonable levels of customer service? Why can't everyone get this level of service? Or, more to the point, why doesn't everyone get this level of service?

    --
    -
  33. Kabletown Klutzes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We shouldn't have been trusting NBC journalism when GE owned them. Why start now?

  34. Re:Story is BS. Make it Right cards aren't that bi by whoever57 · · Score: 1

    The story is BS. Every employee at Comcast gets 3 cards a year. The idea is that if you see or hear someone who's having a problem, you can give them a card and they get a better experience.

    You assume that there is only one type of card. Perhaps certain employees get a different type of card, to be given only to political influencers.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  35. Sounds like BT Executive Level Complains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the UK, the main telco (BT) has truly hopeless customer service (call centres on the other side of the world, usual run around). But... If you mail a complaint to the CEO, it skips the whole process and gets you the Executive Level Complaints team - totally separate from normal customer service, with more power and immediate results. But the normal customer service path will NEVER pass you on to these people - only complaining to the CEO directly does it. Having a friend at a national paper helps too (the criteria for getting that level of service effectively includes "chance of really bad PR if we don't sort it out").

  36. Re:Story is BS. Make it Right cards aren't that bi by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2

    This also makes this community look really uninformed. The first sight of anything about Comcast and people just start saying random bullshit.

    It's my understanding - I heard this from a guy that had a roommate who worked in a Comcast call center - that once a week, they have a "motivational" meeting where fresh babies are sacrificed and eaten.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  37. Re:Story is BS. Make it Right cards aren't that bi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >why doesn't everyone get this level of service

    Comcast would have to spend more on tech support so they'd make less money and NOW WE CAN'T HAVE THAT, CAN WE?

    Are you really that naive?

  38. Re:Story is BS. Make it Right cards aren't that bi by schnell · · Score: 1

    Or, more to the point, why doesn't everyone get this level of service?

    Not to defend Comcast here, because they do have shitty customer service generally. But the state of customer service is what it is because people generally aren't willing to pay for more. Better service = hiring more reps and/or building better customer service tools = more costs which will be passed on to the customer. Sure, they could be Good Guys and decide to spend more on customer care and not increase your bill to do it - but honestly what consumer services company out there ever does that?

    You can get better customer service... you just have to pay for it. Try signing up for a business class service, and you'll see a world of difference. But, again, you have to be willing to pay for it. It's just like with airlines - everyone complains about the crappy seats and paying for soda. But you can get nice seats and free booze on the plane... but you have to pay for a first class ticket. The vast majority of us (myself included) say we want better service but we refuse to put our money where our mouths are and pay for it.

    --
    "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
  39. Re:Story is BS. Make it Right cards aren't that bi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As Employees, we get mixed CS support.
    Anything dealing with services cannot be handled by customer support, and must be routed through your Department's Gratis Services.
    If there's anything wrong-wrong with it, at the Engineering level, you send emails to the appropriate Engineering team to have them take a look.
    At the average-worker level, you can usually create your own ticket for escalation.
    If you don't have access; you call CS, and they usually escalate it to Tier 2.
    Either way, Employee's don't often use the Make It Right cards.

  40. Comcast's Cards are Corruption by MtnDeusExMachina · · Score: 2

    To reiterate Roodvlees' point, the giving of the cards and the receiving of the cards is corruption. It may not be obvious what the dollar value is immediately, but if you count up the time saved by the politically-connected recipients when they get expedited service, then it almost certainly would exceed Federal standards for gifts.

  41. Re:Story is BS. Make it Right cards aren't that bi by IcyWolfy · · Score: 2

    Tier one service is adequate for 70-80% of the people calling in.
    of the above calls, the issue is resolved in one call for 95% of the time.
    It's the deeper problems that require Engineering Insight, or learning customer state, or escalating to what's effectively Tier 5 support, to escalate to Engineers that cause issues. (tier 2 and above get logged; and increase in weight; usually driving bug-fixes and Engineering time)

    The issue is more that no-one has figureud out a way to actually enable good Customer Support.
    This is an ongoing problem and there is no good solution in the wild yet.

    State 1: There are only a few visible symptoms, and end-customers usually have no idea what's going on.
    State 2: There are literally hundreds of systems internally that affect the customer
    State 3: For these 10-20 symptoms, there are 100,000s of possible problems.

    Problem 1: Hiring hundreds of call centre workers for $10/hr, many of whom have little technical background.
    Problem 2: Trying to teach these people everything about Engineering, IT, Infrastructure, Systems Architecture, Hardware, Interaction issues, Software Service Issues, Billing Systems, Switching Systems, etc.... and not quit becasue they now know more than most Engineers.
    PRoblem 3: Because Problem 2 never happens, how does the CS agent search for the solution for your particular problem?
          You state symptom 1, 2, and 3.
          CS does a search, there are 80,000 possible problems.
          CS asks you a question to try to limit.
          You perform, and answer.
          CS enters that in, there are now 50,000 possible problems.
          [repeat until there's a reasonable number]

    This leads to Problem 4: Users lie, or misinterpret. If they answer any question wrong, or perform an action incorrectly and give a unknowningly false response, that just filtered out their actual problem, and their problem will never get resolved on that call.

    Things like "reboot your modem" are good filters, as that eliminates thousands of possible issues if it causes no change. If you don't actually do this (depending on the problem, they would actually send reset signals, and then require you to reboot; many techincally competent people don't reboot when asked, and thus ) a problem which normally would be fixed with a reboot, isn't, simply because the end-user assumed becasue they rebooted before and it did nothing.

    Now, if anyone can design a system that allows unskilled end-users, to communicate their issues, and allow unskilled CS workers to search and find the solution, that would make millions.

    For people who ask "train them more" As a fully trained CS degree, Engineering degree, and Engineer at Comcast, I would say that I have no insight as to how hundreds of systems interact or data-relays function. Within my realm, there are thosands of things that can go wrong, thousands that should never happen (yet somehow do, possibly becaues of CS reps changing state on an account without realising the impact). I can fix many issues. But bceause I have this breadth of technical skill, understanding, and knowledge -- would I work CustSupport? No.

    If you want better Customer Support, figure out how to make it enticing for highly skilled, trained engineers to work phone jobs; and enough of them to support millions of customers.

  42. Re:Story is BS. Make it Right cards aren't that bi by IcyWolfy · · Score: 1

    Comcast is all about not making exceptions; it complicates business and handling.
    Top Engineering ands VPs are treated the same way as Call Center reps; at least when it comes to all the details of initial pay, vacation, benefits, cards, tools, etc.
    Now, the Skilled staff get additional items added on, but these are hacked in.
    To minimize internal costs, means getting everything onto the same systems, no special cases, and nothing un-audited.

    In our division, I have seen, usually near end of year when VPs and Execs send out an email asking "Does anyone have any extra Make It Right cards?" ... employees are usually more than happy to forfeit their cards to someone higher-ranked.

  43. Re:Story is BS. Make it Right cards aren't that bi by IcyWolfy · · Score: 1

    Needless to say, I'm not discounting that the lobbying arm of the company has added benefits, and have access to much more influential tools.
    But the Make It Right cards still relies on existing Customer Support infrastructure.
    There's no room in that particular system to allow for any real exceptions to give preferencial/better service.

    If you go to high in the support chain, your problem won't get solved because of triaging, and work-load, and now issues are being managed by Scrum and Project Managers; and thus you'll wait longer.
    If you go too low in the support chain, they may not have the experience or know how of how do figure out your issue.
    Hence the cards get you to tier 2. You bypass the easy-fixes (assuming you tried that once all ready), and thus Tier 2 can help you better and start assessing your issue.

    If you use the card, and didn't go through Tier 1 first; you'll basically get the same quality of service as the Tier 2 rep needs to basically do all the tier 1 work with you now. Only difference is that the Tier 2 rep has more experience and may have dealt with your particular issue before (which is also the case with Tier 1), and can bypass some questions due to insight.

  44. If I were a Comcast employee... by Antony+T+Curtis · · Score: 1

    If I were a Comcast or Verizon etc employee, I'd keep the priority cards for myself to use when I have a problem. I doubt they'd give most of their employees enough codes to handle all their comms problems.

    --
    No sig. Move along - nothing to see here.
  45. There are two classes of people by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    And if you don't have any VIP cards, then you know what class you are in.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:There are two classes of people by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      Real VIPs don't need cards. People know who they are already.

    2. Re:There are two classes of people by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Over the telephone?

      *ring*ring* This guy sounds exactly like Warren Buffett! I better solve his tech support problems right away.

      I'm in the middle class. I don't know who the VIPs are in my culture, and would not be able to identify them unless they all wore name badges. This is probably because I don't give a shit.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  46. Re:Story is BS. Make it Right cards aren't that bi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm already paying $70 a month for a measly 12 Mbps. I should get decent customer service. Fortunately, there usually isn't a problem, but when there is Century Link is fucking useless at customer service. A couple of weeks ago, I had to reboot their modem 10 times within 24 hours. They swore up and down that there was no problem on their end. Okay, maybe it's the modem I suggested. Very reluctantly they finally agreed to ship me a new modem, but by the time it got to me everything was working fine. So, I'm convinced they fixed something on their end.

    There's no way in hell I would go back to Comcast, but they would have set up a service call and/or shipped me a new modem without hesitation. The problem with Comcast though is you can expect to do that several times a year whereas Century Link has much less downtime. At least they do in my neighborhood.

    And they also bumped my speed up a bit after the last outage. The last speed test I did was nearly 47 Mbps although I really don't notice a difference, but it is annoying to realize that they have the bandwidth available, but are just being stingy with it. There are plenty of idiots out there willing to pay more without realizing that the websites they are accessing can't pour out content at the speeds their internet service can handle.

  47. They got all the caps you need! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh but they are haberdashers-- virtual haberdashers. With their service, one can acquire any number of hats from many online retailers. The core business, however, is to push their own line of quality fiber hats and caps with bands of various width. They even wrap it all up in nice little packets so transport is easier. The service is really top notch. When you synd a question, they acknowledge it promptly while keeping it in the proper frame and ensuring it is routed to the proper technician. They have rarely dropped any of my packets, even when long hauling it down to the local port. I've also been able to do a lot of networking while in their shop. Various people with popular rapport, are often there picking up their own packets or getting the biggest cap with the biggest band width available. I even met Princess Di there once. They suggested that she needed much faster transport and that she should avoid any kind of tunneling but due to her preferred discreet protocols, she declined their advice. Well, we see where that got her! Don't be like her, choose A&A Ltd TODAY!

  48. Re:Story is BS. Make it Right cards aren't that bi by thunderclap · · Score: 1

    So the blood orgy was friday's eh?

  49. Re:Story is BS. Make it Right cards aren't that bi by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

    I eat fresh baby chickens every morning.

  50. Re:Story is BS. Make it Right cards aren't that bi by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

    "But the state of customer service is what it is because people generally aren't willing to pay for more."

    Even if they're willing to pay more: In most locations the choices are Comcast or Comcast.

    That's no incentive to keep prices low OR to provide decent customer service. Monopolies naturally tend to "shaft the customer" attitudes.

    The irony is that PUCs - setup to prevent that kind of issue - are aiding and abetting this kind of thing.