Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: What Tech Companies Won't Be Around In 10 Years?

An anonymous reader writes: It's interesting to look back a decade and see how the tech industry has changed. The mobile phone giants of 10 years ago have all struggled to compete with the smartphone newcomers. Meanwhile, the game console landscape is almost exactly the same. I'm sure few of us predicted Apple's rebirth over the past decade, and many of us thought Microsoft would have fallen a lot further by now. With that in mind, let's make some predictions. What companies aren't going to make it another 10 years? Are Facebook, Twitter, and the other social networking behemoths going to fade as quickly as they arose? What about the heralds of the so-called 'sharing economy,' like Uber? Are IBM and Oracle going to hang on? Along the same lines, what companies do you think will definitely stick around for another decade or more? Post your predictions for all to see. I'll buy you a beer in 10 years if you're right.

8 of 332 comments (clear)

  1. Ten years? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It takes a long time for a big company to die and many can reinvent themselves. Look at the origins of Nokia and Nintendo - neither was exactly a tech company when they started. Companies like Microsoft, Apple, and Google are big enough to survive ten year of terrible decisions by management (Microsoft already has!) without much pain. The companies that tend to die are ones where some disruptive technology changes their market completely and they don't adapt. SGI was a good example: some of their engineers proposed building a cheaper graphics accelerator for the mass market and they decided not to build them because they'd cannibalise the graphics workstation market. Those engineers left and formed nVidia, and now a graphics workstation is just a commodity PC with a high-end nVidia card in it. SGI had the opportunity to lead a shift in the market and decided not to take it. Those are hard to predict, because they typically rely on advances in manufacturing that suddenly make something economically viable that wasn't previously. Often these things are gradual (in the nVidia/SGI case, the reduction in fabrication costs until it became feasible to make a mass-market GPU) and aren't obvious until a watershed has passed.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    1. Re:Ten years? by mwvdlee · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you're afraid creating a new product will cannibalise your current market, some other company will create the product and cannibalise your market for you.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  2. IBM is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    IBM management have turned the company into a financial engineering behemoth, buying their own shares at low interest rates to prop up share prices so management get bonuses, sacking engineering staff, lowering customer service. They're history.

    1. Re:IBM is dead by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      IBM is like toenail fungus . . . it never really completely goes away.

      They used to sell hardware . . . now they sell services.

      In the future, the name IBM will still be around, but I don't know what they will be selling then.

      They don't know yet either.

      One of my predictions for 2015 is that IBM's CEO Ginni Rometty will get the golden parachute.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:IBM is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yet IBM is still hiring and working there is comfortable: work is easy, plenty of benefits, and you get paid well.

      hum... paid well? As someone who works there, this is not really the case. IBM has indeed turned into a perfect example of how not to be in tech. Aside from specific research areas IBM has struggled, not meeting deadlines, outsourcing without caring for quality on the deliver, not to mention that is just got caught up on its own compulsion to control results that you have projects that get delayed and even axed due to poor internal auditing reviews. Feedback is an area where IBM struggles the most: There is no communication accross the board, salaries are quite low (maybe that can be different on US, but everywhere else it is lagging behind). It is indeed comfortable to work there as infrastructure is rather good on some things, but the truth is that I have to agree that I don't think IBM is going away, what they will be doing in 10 years is anyone's guess, but since they have sold pretty much anything they could, there is no way of knowing where we'll be

  3. 10 Years Can Be A Long Time by msobkow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ten years can be a long time if you've got the cash and a "core business" to eek out existence on. As long as there is a need for new mainframes for the banking industry, IBM will be around. I think they're going to shrink a lot, though.

    Oracle isn't going anywhere. They're too entrenched.

    Apple's market will shrink rather than grow, primarily due to their failure to really innovate. Let's face it, they've been tweaking and fiddling for over five years now rather than coming out with anything new or earth shattering. But they've got the cash to buy an entire nation (or two), so they'll still be around.

    The same goes for Microsoft. They've got sufficient cash and resources to hang on for a long time, even if their core markets are shrinking. Let's face it -- basic business functionality will always be needed, even if it isn't glamourous and exciting. They'll continue to lose market share to tablets and smell phones in the consumer markets, and will re-focus on their core business of serving business customers.

    Uber, Lyft, and the like are going to encounter some rude shocks from the courts in the near future, and their business models will be declared illegal. It's already happening in a lot of districts.

    Google Plus will finally get the axe in 2-3 years, but Google itself will continue along it's merry way.

    Twitter will shrink dramatically or disappear entirely as the video capabilities of higher bandwidth and newer/denser technologies make written dialogue even more irrelevant than it is today.

    Facebook will still be around, and bigger than ever. They've made a couple of smart investments, and if those play out, they're going to grow their market substantially with them (especially on the VR front -- think virtual meetings, markets, and presentations.)

    The real shock is going to be the death of the PC. With the advent of higher resolution virtual displays and augmented reality glasses, the need for a physical screen will finally wane and the PC will be replaced by a bluetooth keyboard and mouse talking to that virtual hardware.

    The cloud bubble will finally burst wide open when the US tries to pull the same shit on corporate data that they're doing with email and Microsoft right now. The near violent rejection of US policies by the world that results will cause several corporations to leave the US just to survive, and Bush 47 will be left to wonder what happened to the empire and practice his fiddle.

    Lenovo will continue to grow, while HP/Compaq shrinks due to their abysmal build quality and lack of innovation.

    Samsung will level off as the market for Android devices becomes saturated, but with their product range, they'll still be a healthy company.

    Keep an eye on Chinese companies, as their currency takes over more and more of the international markets from the US dollar and it becomes more and more convenient to deal directly with the Chinese.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:10 Years Can Be A Long Time by CraigCruden · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have to disagree with your analysis. Phone and tablet is more of a consumption device or a multi-media menu system, but it is not going to displace the computer - just give more options (computer is more of a work instrument - i.e. creation rather than consumption). The reduction of prices since I started using personal computers (my first one bought by my father was an IBM PC DOS 1.1 machine for $6,400 which included a 20% discount (2 floppy drive, electrohome cga monitor and a crappy dot matrix). Now with the lower prices, I have an iphone, tablet, and personal computer all for a fraction of the price. Each serves a purpose. I don't really want a device to try to be all things to all people and do nothing great. I do want my devices to work together seamlessly (cloud is the first step). I find a tablet works great for reading, some browsing and watching videos and maybe menu entry -- but it would kill me to have to sit in front of one trying work with it. I sit far enough away from the computer that having a touch interface is a hassle. You can make an operating system that is the same for all devices (if they are powerful enough) but the user interfaces should not all be the same since you don't use them all the same way. That is why Microsoft has had such problems with adoption with Windows 8. If I want lots of functionality and a large screen - I will use my computer -- not a tablet.

    2. Re:10 Years Can Be A Long Time by Tom · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The real shock is going to be the death of the PC.

      Again? Didn't it already die two dozen times? Oh wait, those were all predictions that didn't come true.

      Keep an eye on Chinese companies,

      mod parent +1 insightful just for that sentence. The stupid assumption that will ruin most of the predictions I've read so far is that US companies will continue to dominate the tech industry. But real innovation out of the USA has become scarce. Uber and crap are not innovators, they're basically the Internet equivalent of software patents - you take something that's been known for centuries and add "with a computer program" to it, voila, new patent. Same with most US-based "revolutionary" startups. Take something old and boring, add "over the Internet" to it, voila, investor capital.

      Meanwhile, in Asia a thousand companies have been working on evolutionary progress quietly for a decade. Such evolutionary progress is very often the predecessor to revolutionary advances, as it reaches a critical mass.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org