Slashdot Mirror


Ancient Planes and Other Claims Spark Controversy at Indian Science Congress

An anonymous reader writes A paper presented at the 102nd Indian Science Congress on Sunday claims that Indians had mastered aviation thousands of years before the Wright brothers. India's science and technology minister Mr. Harsh Vardhan who was present at the conference claimed that ancient Indian mathematicians discovered the Pythagorean theorem but that the Greeks got the credit. These startling claims come just a few days after prime minister Narendra Modi had called Lord Ganesha who is part elephant and part human, a product of ancient India's knowledge of plastic surgery.

381 comments

  1. ...and... by Charliemopps · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...and the best part is they have Nukes!

    1. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's so ghee

    2. Re:...and... by Rei · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's an interesting phenomenon and you see the same thing in Russian science. There are an awful lot of brilliant scientists in both India and Russia doing amazing things. But it's like there's no filter. The unadulterated garbage rises just as much to the top as the actual great scientific work. I can't help but wonder if it's related to the same sort of corruption and patronage systems that you see a lot in the business and political world as well.

      It's also interesting that even on things that they innovate on (and there have been a lot), you don't see much commercialization actually within their respective countries. You see a lot more when they leave and move to Europe or the US or whatnot.

      --
      If you play a Ke$ha song backwards, you hear messages from Satan. Even worse, if you play it forwards you hear Ke$ha.
    3. Re:...and... by EmeraldBot · · Score: 2

      ...and the best part is they have Nukes!

      "Our words are backed with NUCLEAR WEAPONS!" - Ghandi

      --
      "Set a man a fire, he'll be warm for the rest of the night. Set a man afire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
    4. Re:...and... by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's an interesting phenomenon and you see the same thing in Russian science. There are an awful lot of brilliant scientists in both India and Russia doing amazing things. But it's like there's no filter. The unadulterated garbage rises just as much to the top as the actual great scientific work.

      It's a good thing this sort of quackery is limited to India and Russia. I'd be pretty embarrassed if we had some of our people claiming that the world was only a few thousand years old, that climate change doesn't exist, and that we didn't evolve over time but were all designed by a supernatural entity.

    5. Re:...and... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      In the US, we just let politicians do that for us.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    6. Re:...and... by war4peace · · Score: 2, Informative

      +1 funny.
      For those who didn't understand, oblig. reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G...

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    7. Re:...and... by Bongo · · Score: 0, Troll

      You Americans have plenty to feel embarrassed about. Questioning a dodgy paradigm isn't one of them.

    8. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So does the United States, a federation that believes in angels and that god is on its side, and which requires school children to recite a pledge of allegiance every day. Half the population doesn't even believe in evolution! ...and the best part is they have Nukes!

      And how is India different?

    9. Re:...and... by CRCulver · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's a good thing this sort of quackery is limited to India and Russia. I'd be pretty embarrassed if we had some of our people claiming that the world was only a few thousand years old, that climate change doesn't exist, and that we didn't evolve over time but were all designed by a supernatural entity.

      These two situations are not comparable. Yes, the United States has Creationists and such, but they tend to move in their own circles, and even in academia they are found at private Christian universities. In India and Russia however, one tends to see a lot of quackery coming from state-run universities. This is probably facilitated by stronger job security (against much lower salaries) for certain faculty, combined with lower barriers to publication.

    10. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So I have (ok had) a Russian friend. He's still a coworker, but I don't talk to him anymore.

      He was talking to me, and since my background is a bit outside of the normal background for a programmer (did Biological research) he eventually guided me to a (didn't know it at the time) hoax finding in South America. I worked on the background information until I found out that not only was it a hoax, but in light of prosecution the perpetrator decided to recant and show how he manufactured the fake items.

      His stance is that the recanting was done by coercion and that some of the items (which are now so popular you can buy them at the airport) are probably legitimate (admitting that some of them are probably fake as the man manufactured one for a television program).

      I still can't follow his logic; but, it doesn't bode well for (what I assume is) the common Russian understanding of Science. Sure, their best is probably not subject to believing in a hoax after it is fully debunked; but, one would hope that a person trained in mathematics (computer science) would be a bit better than an ardent believer in an established hoax.

      After mending hurt feelings, and making up with him, I eventually heard him ramble on about the recent Russian military action. He believes that the Russians were justified in invading; because, that country isn't really a country anyway, it's just Russian soil. He couldn't keep his temper while discussing it (and it quickly spilled over into some USA hatred).

      Now I say "Hi" to him and make sure my path through the offices don't coincide with his for any length of time. Life is too short to get a bunch of bullshit lodged in your head.

    11. Re:...and... by AqD · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And how is India different?

      In India idiots are recognized as idiots.

    12. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If India hadn't developed nukes, Pakistan and China would have done major incursions into Indian territory by now. In fact the USA has indirectly helped Pakistan finance its nuke program over the years. if India had not developed nukes, Pakistan and China would have been in a position to completely invade and take over India any time they pleased. This would NOT have been a good thing for India, or the world, especially USA, because unlike India, the nations of Pakistan and China are not democracies. One is a country held to ransom by fanatic violent religious terrorists and the other is a crazy lying corrupt fascist pseudo-communist country.

    13. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly so do Americans and you put Christian fundies in charge of them. Mr Pot Meet Mr kettle

    14. Re:...and... by nucrash · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or claiming that water fluoridation causes sterilization or vaccination causes autism or GMOs are killing us.

      Liberal and Conservative sides can both be equally anti-science.

      --
      Place something witty here
    15. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Half the population doesn't understand Evolution; and, might have some doubts it is fully correct. However, the number that "don't believe" is actually much smaller. The problem is that we tend to bias our polling over such topics quite badly; because, the polling is typically done by religious institutions. This leads to questions like "Considering that Scientists can't figure out whether carrots give you cancer or not, do you trust them to know that evolution is 100% right? Do you believe that a monkey can eventually give birth to a person? Any reasonable answer to such questions is then recast into a dis-belief in evolution.

    16. Re:...and... by pastafazou · · Score: 1, Troll

      Your comment won't be popular here. Slashdot is a haven for leftist ideology. Calling them out on their hypocrisy will only get you modded down.

    17. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every country has crackpots, crazies, and people who are quite smart but just learned things the wrong way. That is not the issue being brought up by the post you replied to. Some places, the crazy stuff gets presenting and almost endorsed to some level by other non-crazy scientists.

      You do have to be careful how you interpret such material being present at different events though. A lot of conferences will let just about anyone in as long as their material is in the vaguest sense on topic and they pay the fee, especially when there is no proceedings (e.g. some of the larger physics conferences). So some crackpots do show up (while others claiming they were kicked out or banned are full of it when they name those specific conferences..). However, it is a different story when you see such people giving invited talks, where they were specifically requested to present their stuff as part of a showcase what the conference thinks is leading and important research. I've seen this happen at some larger conferences abroad. It's happened a couple times at smaller conferences in the US that I've been to, but seemed more like less formal settings where an older, formerly prominent scientist gets invited and they go way off topic because they've delved into other topics when they retired.

      There is also a difference in attitude how such talks are handled. Just about everywhere you'll find some people rolling their eyes. But in some places, there will be a lot of generic support for fellow researchers regardless of their work, and afew people will bug you if you politely asked a damning question. Whereas in most western contexts, people only get upset with your questions if they waste time, e.g. show you didn't pay attention to the talk, or you drag them out when you should just talk to the person afterwards instead of in front of everyone. In the former cases, it is like there is a solidarity amongst people that who's region had a hard time pulling itself up by the bootstraps to get where they are today in the shadow of other more prosperous regions. It is an understandable reaction, but sometimes goes too far. The only place I've really noticed that kind of attitude and blind support in the US is among some of the crackpots, where someone with a reasonable idea that conflicts with observations in a subtle way will defend and promote fellow crackpots, including those with downright delusional theories, as if underdogs need to stick together and are all equally insightful.

    18. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So does the United States, a federation that believes in angels and that god is on its side, and which requires school children to recite a pledge of allegiance every day. Half the population doesn't even believe in evolution! ...and the best part is they have Nukes!

      Maybe it depends on the state but we stopped reciting the pledge in Illinois sometime around Middle School (around '95 or a so.) Dunno how it is today.

    19. Re:...and... by arkenian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's a good thing this sort of quackery is limited to India and Russia. I'd be pretty embarrassed if we had some of our people claiming that the world was only a few thousand years old, that climate change doesn't exist, and that we didn't evolve over time but were all designed by a supernatural entity.

      These two situations are not comparable. Yes, the United States has Creationists and such, but they tend to move in their own circles, and even in academia they are found at private Christian universities. In India and Russia however, one tends to see a lot of quackery coming from state-run universities. This is probably facilitated by stronger job security (against much lower salaries) for certain faculty, combined with lower barriers to publication.

      To some extent. But the claims on ancient indian technology are religious-based as well, in most respects. And what an indian government official says is not necessarily a shared opinion of the actual academics. As a side note, my recollection is that the pythagorean theorem being first discovered in India actually has some credibility, the rest of the examples are utter garbage of course.

    20. Re:...and... by operagost · · Score: 1

      We're not hearing it from our heads of state and supposed scientific leaders, are we?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    21. Re:...and... by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...and the best part is they have Nukes!

      Which according to The History Channel were also invented in India thousands of years ago!

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    22. Re:...and... by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Slashdot is haven for people who prefer an evidence based approach, and despise you idiots who need to boil everything down to "left" and "right" since both sides of the spectrum as seen by the US are full of hypocrisy.

      If you blindly think the left is all good or the right is all good ... you're a fucking moron who is driven by ideology and not intellect.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    23. Re:...and... by operagost · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, I assume this means that the prime minister and Minister of Science have already been removed from office?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    24. Re:...and... by LWATCDR · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And landed men on the moon, sent the first probes to Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. Invented the transistor and IC, created Unix and C and managed to turn Japan in to democratic nation and kept Europe for burning to the the ground...
      And we have nukes.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    25. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Funny, but if I recall the original water fluoridation conspiracies came from John Bircher types who said it was a plot by Communists to mind-control Americans. And I think you'll find many anti-vaxers & anti GMO people these days are Conservative homeschool sorts.

    26. Re:...and... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Yes, the Indians have it wrong. We all know that earth is only 6000 years old, and that ginish was simply one of the dinosaurs that man used to play with in the garden of eden.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    27. Re:...and... by operagost · · Score: 3, Informative

      We don't require children to recite the pledge of allegiance, belief in angels is not part of our system of government, and the motto on our currency is "In God We Trust", not "God is on Our Side".

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    28. Re:...and... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      along with the new prime minister.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    29. Re:...and... by TWX · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It also seems like our American politicians that land on the side of the quackery don't actually believe it most of the time, they're using a population that's too stupid to see that their patron only wants their votes. The politician almost always stops short of fully committing to the quackery cause.

      These reports make it clear that many politicians in other countries either are much less cautious, or actually do support these crazy notions.

      Granted, we could just be seeing the crazy part, as crap rises to the top and makes for good press, regardless of how fringe it is.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    30. Re:...and... by CaptainDork · · Score: 0

      The only interesting part of your comment is your concern about being modded down.

      Why?

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    31. Re:...and... by TWX · · Score: 2

      Or claiming that water fluoridation causes sterilization or vaccination causes autism or GMOs are killing us.

      Keep your fluoridated water away from my precious bodily fluids...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    32. Re:...and... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Actually, Paki nukes came only after Indian nukes. But, I agree that without them, India would be in trouble from both China and possibly, Pakistan.

      However, what started India down the path of building a nuke was NOT China or Pakistan. It was Nixon, who threatened India with nukes if they do not stop interfering with East Pakistan. He flat out told them that we have a nuke on the enterprize right off their shore and would use it unless they stopped. That man was such an ass.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    33. Re:...and... by peragrin · · Score: 0

      Right several states require creationism to be taught next to evolution. And there is a whole museum to prove their facts.

      If we get another republican president expect such things to be pushed during the 2016 ballots too.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    34. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man for a moment I took you seriously.

    35. Re:...and... by rgmoore · · Score: 2, Informative

      We're not hearing it from our head of state right now, but our previous head of state was a fundamentalist evangelical who was perfectly happy to ignore climate change, endorse intelligent design, and generally ignore any science that gave him answers he didn't want to hear. Of course that was in no way limited to science questions. He was also more than happy to ignore reports from the intelligence community that he didn't want to hear and fabricate evidence to support policies like invading Iraq.

      --

      There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

    36. Re:...and... by SecurityGuy · · Score: 1

      So does the United States, a federation that believes in angels and that god is on its side

      The US is composed of 300 million people, some of which believe that.

      ...and which requires school children to recite a pledge of allegiance every day

      No they don't. When I was a kid, pretty much everybody recited it in elementary (primary) school, but by high school (the last 4 years) it was soundly ignored by pretty much everyone.

    37. Re:...and... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      Fortunately, the right-wing component of the antiscience movement has no history of actually stopping progress. No creationist has ever filed a lawsuit halting work on vital energy infrastructure, for example. The anti-fluoridationist right had a moment in the early Fifties, but to get votes against fluoridation to stick in modern times, the anti-fuoridationists had to switch sides and ally with the left, as recently happened in Oregon.

    38. Re:...and... by cayenne8 · · Score: 3

      Damn...what are they smoking over there in India these days?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    39. Re:...and... by mwvdlee · · Score: 0

      Quackery like christianity and even unpopular superstitions like mormonism?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    40. Re:...and... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, the Indians have it wrong

      It isn't "the Indians", it is a fringe group of kooks at the top of the BJP. The BJP is the KKK of India, and Narendra Modi is their David Duke. It says something about the sickness of Indian society that he is also the country's prime minister.

    41. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Mixing GMOs with water fluaridation and vaccination hysteria shows you have no idea what the problems is about GMOs.

      The main objection to GMOs isn't that they kill humans directly.
      The IP problems surounding GMOs should be enough for slashdot types to reject them.
      Also most GMOs are simply more resistent to pesticides. So more GMOs => more poison in food production.
      Another argument is, that GMOs have genes inserted that no plant ever could acquire naturally. So we simply have no idea what in the long term will happen with these GMO strains. Most probably nothing, but when the entire food production is at stake, I would be carful.

    42. Re:...and... by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      The main problem here is thinking that the political spectrum is one-dimensional.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    43. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      but, one would hope that a person trained in mathematics (computer science) would be a bit better than an ardent believer in an established hoax.

      I see a lot of cold emailed crackpot stuff that is sent to the whole physics department I work at. A large number of the people pushing such things have engineering and/or computer science backgrounds. Having a math background helps some think they have all the tools needed to re-invent physics (typically forgetting the other tool: observations). Also, to some degree having such a background used to make it more likely someone knew how to make use of the internet, which helps with the self-publishing and finding things that will reenforce fringe beliefs. But that has been changing as now nearly everyone can make a webpage, etc.

      Regardless, to some degree a bit of knowledge is needed before even knowing what to propose new ideas for, and knowledge in one field can boost confidence in other fields. Every so often even a well experienced and accomplished scientist will go off the deep end in a field unrelated to their previous experience. Then similar situations result, where coworkers will try to steer clear of discussing anything that will give them a tangent to launch off of.

    44. Re:...and... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      "Conservative types" tend not to care terribly about issues like food quality or about the political consequences of allowing the corn equivalent of Microsoft. In either case, they will be all for allowing "job creators" to completely run amok.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    45. Re:...and... by rossdee · · Score: 1

      "...and the best part is they have Nukes!

        Which according to The History Channel were also invented in India thousands of years ago!"

      No, it was the aliens that invented them, and the flying machines and stuff, and the indians thought they were gods...

      "Ancient Aliens" new episodes on the H2 channel, with expert opinion from Eric Von Daniken
       

    46. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few comments:

      1) The first claim is a paper that likely wasn't subject to significant peer review. The author is not a scientist or archaeologist, he's a flight instructor who works for the Indian Science Conference, a government ministry.

      2) The other two claims, the plastic surgery one and the Pythagorean theorem one, are by the Prime Minister and his subordinate, the Science and Technology Minister, both government officials.

      Not a single claim made by a scientist in India; all bureaucrats. It would stand to logic that this is mostly government propaganda likely designed not for foreign consumption but local consumption, considering the rather large uneducated voting populace in India.

    47. Re:...and... by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      those are mostly the views of republican suburban housewives bro.

    48. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get off my internet, you foreigner.

    49. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I expect outrageous claims from crackpot and crazies but it really is sad to see the prime minister of the worlds largest democracy and his minister of science come up with stupid claims. These aren't some low level politicians but people who directly influence policies for 18% of the worlds population.

    50. Re:...and... by geantvert · · Score: 1

      Another potential issue is horizontal gene transfer, that is the ability for genes to be transfered to other species.
      In practice, that means that some of those pesticide resistant genes may eventually end up in plants that are supposed to be killed by pesticides.

    51. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And of course invented this internet/world wide web thingy all the USA bashers love to utilize to facilitate their USA bashing...

    52. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Half the population doesn't understand Evolution; and, might have some doubts it is fully correct. However, the number that "don't believe" is actually much smaller. The problem is that we tend to bias our polling over such topics quite badly

      Here is the Gallup poll most frequently cited, in which some 40%+ say "God created humans in their present form," which would seem to preclude the idea that we evolved.

      Of course, there are a number of ways you can believe animals evolved but humans are somehow "special" and exempt from non-guided evolution, but the poll doesn't distinguish between human evolution and the rest of biology.

    53. Re:...and... by Rei · · Score: 1

      Part of the problem is that they grew up in an environment where conspiracy is bloody everywhere. I mean, basic, readily-disprovable facts proclaimed daily as truth. Widespread, practically daily use of actors to portray fictional stories in the media. Secret reporting on neighbors - both truthfuly and as lies. Made up charges as a common way to get inconvenient people out of the way. Etc. How can a person grow up in such an environment and *not* end up as a conspiracy theorist?

      --
      If you play a Ke$ha song backwards, you hear messages from Satan. Even worse, if you play it forwards you hear Ke$ha.
    54. Re:...and... by Rei · · Score: 1

      Also: I thought it was pretty obvious that I was talking about the scientific community, not the general public.

      --
      If you play a Ke$ha song backwards, you hear messages from Satan. Even worse, if you play it forwards you hear Ke$ha.
    55. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't think you can really compare the BJP to the KKK. More the Tea Party: mainstream religious fanatics with no real understanding of the consequences of their ideologically-motivated policies.

      If you think there aren't plenty of evolution deniers in the US government, well, you haven't talked to too many people in the DoD or DHS.

      (Yes, there are left-wing ideologues in the US, too, but they are very marginalized; remember that there is only ONE mainstream socialist in the US Congress, Senator Bernie Sanders, and even he is self-described as an "independent," despite the Eugene Debs photo in his office).

    56. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Since the History channel was invented in India 3000 BCE, they are a bias source.

    57. Re: ...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the right wing in the US about our scientific advancement of animal brain transplantation: http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=oAPGHf0n7x4

    58. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's an interesting phenomenon and you see the same thing in Russian science.

      And the Russians also have nuclear wessels.

    59. Re:...and... by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      I cannot help but wonder if when they read this stuff that it allows themselves to release their muscle tension, while in a western bathroom.

    60. Re:...and... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      There are damned few scientists in the West who claim those things. In fact, even the very tiny number of scientists who reject major branches of research, like Frank Spencer and Michael Behe, only do so in books, op-ed pieces and other similar anti-science venues.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    61. Re:...and... by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There is a strong vein of Hindu nationalism which intrudes on a number of fields. One particular area of research where this sort of Hindu jingoism pops in is in Indo-European linguistics. While the overwhelming majority of researchers into Proto-Indo-European believe the PIE urheimat is either in Eastern Europe or possibly Anatolia, there are a number of Indian linguists who insist, despite every evidence that the Indo-Iranian languages arrived relatively late in the subcontinent, that Proto-Indo-European's origins are in or near India.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    62. Re:...and... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      You're kidding, right? THe bulk of posters here appear to be Libertarians who believe having a duly elected legislative branch taxing them is somehow theft.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    63. Re:...and... by deadweight · · Score: 1

      Nixon was going to start a nuclear war over freaking "East Pakistan"? Link please!

    64. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats Manmade Global Warming that many people (including some important meteoroloists who certainly DIDNT agree with "the debate is over" Algore the Scientifc Moron) DONT see as a viable theory (rather as an alarmist leftist power play based on VERY dodgy and dishonest pseudo-scienced endorsed by alot of politically biased unqualified academics). Climate change theory? Which one. Its not a theory that climate can change and the causes are many (and mans actions is usually the least in effect). You might wanna get off you ignorancehorse and research the real science about sun activity being a primary source of 'climate change' instead of listening to the kneejerks.

    65. Re:...and... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      I make no claim about the veracity of this link. Or this one. Or even this one.

      But googling for "nixon enterprise nukes india", those are the first 3 results.

      Do I find it implausible that America threw around some weight to bully someone into doing something they wanted for their own ends?

      Not even a little.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    66. Re:...and... by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      Or claiming that water fluoridation causes sterilization or vaccination causes autism or GMOs are killing us.

      Liberal and Conservative sides can both be equally anti-science.

      Agreed, but self-reporting research by Monsanto and Dow Chemical isn't science.

    67. Re:...and... by TWX · · Score: 2

      No, quackery like "orthodox innovation" fundamentalism, where one essentially creates a new belief while claiming that the new belief is actually an old one. Kind of like how everyone harkens back to the 1950s, where the girls were virtuous, the boys were all healthy, athletic, and strong, and the kids ate their vegetables and listened to their parents that were faithful to each other. In reality, I expect that people in the 1950s were a lot like they are today, just with less technology to make for more leisure time.

      Then you have politicians that flirt with separatist fringe groups in Texas and in Alaska, simply to get their votes, with absolutely no intention of succession.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    68. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonsense, the BJP is not any where near the KKK of India.
      Narendra Modi is not David Duke.

      The VHP is the KKK of India. They handle the BJP's dirty work when necessary.
      Or if you prefer Shiv Sena and Bal Thackeray fill the role of KKK.

      BJP, is very nationalist but its not the equivalent of the KKK.
      Although, it is nice seeing someone trying to bring in some sense accuracy to xenophobic discussions. So +1!

    69. Re:...and... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Empires rise and fall. At least America will be known for these accomplishments long after we're gone.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    70. Re:...and... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      I don't think you can really compare the BJP to the KKK. More the Tea Party

      The BJP is a murderous hate group. They have killed hundreds of people. The Tea Party has killed no one.

    71. Re:...and... by Gavagai80 · · Score: 0

      Heh. If only your rose-colored view of slashdot were correct.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    72. Re:...and... by swb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How can a person grow up in such an environment and *not* end up as a conspiracy theorist?

      I have a boss who is a Russian (his father was an officer in the Red Army, and I'd guess that party membership went along with that) and it's often amazing how his "management style" often ends up feeling like a parody of life in the communist party. "Meetings" which often ended up being long-winded droning about a bunch of topics, management-by-decree, and when he screwed something up at a client it was amazing how he would go into truth-suppression mode, outright lying and in one case, fabricating "evidence" to deny his involvement in problem.

      As maddening as his management "style" was, he was a decent human being and often quite flexible and generous on a one-on-one basis. I just couldn't help but think his entire life had been exposed to both the weird thinking of the Red Army (which is probably not that much weirder than any Army) AND life in the community party and he just didn't know any different. He ultimately hired another guy (native-born American, with more management experience) who took over most of his employee-facing management.

      Another friend I related this to had a Russian friend who ran his own company. When I related my story to her she said "Of course it's because he's Russian. My friend figured that out after he had several employees quit and figured out you can't manage Americans like Russians; he hired someone to manage people and it got so much better."

    73. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This article give additional weight to what you mention:

      http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/01/putin-russia-tv-113960.html?ml=m_u1_1

    74. Re:...and... by sudon't · · Score: 1

      ...and the best part is they have Nukes!

      So does the US. On that note, I am glad it's not only the US that has this problem of people trying to inject mythology into history and science. I get tired of being the World's laughing stock.

      Haha, everybody look at stupid India!

      --
      -- sudon't

      Air-ride Equipped

    75. Re:...and... by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      India was considered communist-aligned, so the USA was frequently antagonistic.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    76. Re:...and... by sudon't · · Score: 2

      Excuse me, we are laughing at India right now.

      --
      -- sudon't

      Air-ride Equipped

    77. Re:...and... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      That's my point. Sweeping generalizations based on the perceived stupidity of a number, even a majority of citizens is not a reasonable criteria for judging a country or the merits of it having nukes.

      Whoever modded me flamebait obviously didn't get that, I'll try to be less subtle next time.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    78. Re:...and... by sudon't · · Score: 1

      Maybe it depends on the state but we stopped reciting the pledge in Illinois sometime around Middle School (around '95 or a so.) Dunno how it is today.

      Grade school kids are still forced to do it. Which never ceases to blow my mind. They didn't have middle school when I was a kid, (late sixties, early seventies), so I was subjected to this McCarthyite indoctrination through the eighth grade. I don't know if middle schoolers are made to do this in other states.

      --
      -- sudon't

      Air-ride Equipped

    79. Re:...and... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Russia has a long history of crackpot science and alternative history, at times state-promoted.

      Soviet period (but still popular in some circles):

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Modern period:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T...
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      There is even an organization that basically hosts all the crackpots under the same roof, with official-sounding credentials etc (along with some genuine scientists that they've duped into joining, who give the lists some credibility):

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    80. Re:...and... by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      GMOs are killing us.

      That ship has sailed. Today's quacks are all about the deadly inflammation caused by HFCS and gluten.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    81. Re: ...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is theft when it's used to line the pockets of the wealthy without providing services in proportion to the amount taken. There are many abuses of power at all levels. Right now we have just enough halfway decent leaders to keep the house of cards from falling. All it takes are a few more good ones or a few more bad ones and we could be heading into a new golden age or the darkest of days. If we peons lead the way by demanding honesty, integrity and personal responsibility in ourselves and in out leaders then I think we'll be alright.

    82. Re: ...and... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      You could, oh I dunno, vote for someone else.

      At the end of the day, Congress, whatever the ethics of its members, is a directly elected body. Perhaps if more Americans bothered to vote, they might get better results.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    83. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems that Left-Right is meaning less and less, and the principal axis is shifting towards

      1. Government == Pure Evil, Business == Pure Good (libertarian-republican-anarchists)

      2. Everything Else

    84. Re:...and... by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      "Conservative types" tend not to care terribly about issues like food quality or about the political consequences of allowing the corn equivalent of Microsoft. In either case, they will be all for allowing "job creators" to completely run amok.

      Funny since it's primarily the agricultural lobby, environmentalists, and liberal dems pushing corn-based ethanol. Most in the US don't want it - especially since it is raising prices on anything that uses other corn derivatives.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    85. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee... I wonder who's payroll you're on.

      Didn't the Indians do their blast test before the other brown guys? And isn't the BJP (India's ruling party) a bunch of right wing facist fanatics?

      Sounds like a case of the pot calling the kettle brown.

    86. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and... Canada helped supply the bomb, indirectly, to both India and Pakistan by giving them research notes and reactors and assuming that both would be honourable and never use them for nefarious purposes...

    87. Re:...and... by the+gnat · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find many anti-vaxers & anti GMO people these days are Conservative homeschool sorts.

      Sadly, no. I live an a notoriously lefty enclave and the level of anti-GMO (or anti-nuclear, or anti-cell phone radiation, etc.) sentiment is much higher here than in most of the US. I find it marginally more tolerable than creationism (which is almost entirely a right-wing phenomenon), but only because I especially despise the overtly anti-intellectual goal of indoctrinating children with creation myths.

    88. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your argument is worse than the quackery it is ranting about.
      Here is why.
      These quack papers on ancient Indian aviation were written by some retired pilot not Indian *scientists*.
      But oh, why let the truth get in the way of a great opportunity for a racist rant against Indian culture, huh?

    89. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, but self-reporting research by Monsanto and Dow Chemical isn't science.

      Says another anti-science dingbat.

      Science is a method. Valid science is still valid when it comes from Monsanto or Dow. But anti-science idiots like you are too stupid to understand that.

    90. Re:...and... by CRCulver · · Score: 3, Interesting

      These quack papers on ancient Indian aviation were written by some retired pilot not Indian *scientists*.

      I work in a field in which Hindutva fundamentalists are a prominent presence. Papers making the same claims of early Indian aviation and advanced weaponry, published by actual faculty at Indian universities, are a common sight.

    91. Re:...and... by the+gnat · · Score: 4, Informative

      My favorite part about working with a Russian scientist: In the original Star Trek series, Chekhov often makes comments claiming specific discoveries or cultural artifacts as Russian - "discovered by famous Russian astronomer" or "old Russian fairy tale: if shoe fits, wear it". It's sort of a running joke, I assume related to the fact that 20th century Russian science tended to be totally cut off from the rest of the world. The really funny thing: THEY ACTUALLY DO THIS. And not just about historical discoveries either. I left a perfectly good job in large part because of this kind of crap.

    92. Re:...and... by skam240 · · Score: 1

      Oh look, it got modded up to 5 while you got modded to 0 and labeled troll. Accurate grading on all fronts!

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    93. Re:...and... by PsiCTO · · Score: 1

      herbicide?

    94. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my experience, by the late seventies and early eighties, it wasn't forced upon grade school kids. They would ask all of the kids to do it, but if you could give any reason why you wouldn't do it, they left it alone (i.e., if you had some reason you didn't want to beyond just being lazy and could string some words together to state such). Kids that were being lazy were told to do so, and sometimes they double checked things with the parents to make sure the parents did actually want the kids to do it. It mostly came down to teachers if anything, as some were control freaks about everything, while most had their priorities elsewhere.

    95. Re: ...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No it's not. The scientific process include reproducibility which cannot be considered proven with a single corporate coalition behind all the results.

    96. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is even an organization that basically hosts all the crackpots under the same roof, with official-sounding credentials etc (along with some genuine scientists that they've duped into joining, who give the lists some credibility):

      I've seen similar things in the West, although more so with journals providing "peer reviewed" publishing for crackpots. They will also get a mix of other papers, typically from other countries that don't speak English and from the writing might not be quite aware of what they are publishing to. The other papers tend to be pretty mundane, but solid results, like properties of some particular mineral, material, or semiconductor under some common conditions. Then there are papers, sometimes published by the same small set of authors every quarter, that go on about pet theories and physics via numerology, etc. Considering the spam I see from obscure for profit journals, I wouldn't be surprised if they spam with what looks like an invited publication and get a few that didn't check carefully what types of articles are in the journal.

    97. Re:...and... by SoftwareArtist · · Score: 1

      None of those is a liberal position. How many Democrats in congress can you name who endorse any of them? In contrast, a large number of Republicans in congress have explicitly and publicly rejected climate change and/or evolution. Those are mainstream positions within the party.

      --
      "I'm too busy to research this and form an educated opinion, but I do have time to tell everyone my uninformed opinion."
    98. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a brief summary of the "real science" for you. I'd start with the 'basic' tab if I were you, based on your frothing-at-the-mouth tone.

      http://www.skepticalscience.com/solar-activity-sunspots-global-warming-basic.htm

    99. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you didn't describe your boss well, but your description sounds makes him sound like an archetype of a rather common type of manager, not so much Russian. This is to the point it could come out of some Dilbert (not necessarily the PHB when made dumb) or other office humor stereotyping management as such. It doesn't help that people with such personalities can rise to management easily in various environments, or pull off financially successful businesses as owner even if their product is not so successful.

      The personality of coworkers from communist eastern Europe and USSR that I've had didn't have much in common, other than they were usually easily annoyed or angered by American hyperbole about politicians being socialists or communists.

    100. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Science has proven intelligent design. It's not possible to bootstrap life. And don't bother with posts about evolution. That's adaptive mutation you are referring to.

    101. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The BJP is a murderous hate group. They have killed hundreds of people. The Tea Party has killed no one.

      But the Republicans have killed hundreds of thousands of people. So we can compare BJP to the republicans expect about three orders of magnitude milder.

    102. Re:...and... by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      At least they have a minister for science, here in Australia one of the first things our new PM did was to get rid of the position "minister of science" in his new cabinet, a position that has been supported by both sides for over 75yrs. He has spent the last year or so defunding institutions such as the CSIRO, in his ideology science is subservient to industry, in particular the mining industry, which is why he merged the science ministry into the industry portfolio, decommissioned the climate commission and rolled back the "carbon tax".

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    103. Re:...and... by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      In 1960's Australia people were expected to stand for "God save the queen" at the cinema. A B/W picture of the Queen would come on the screen just before the movie, the anthem would start playing, and the audience would all stand up in silence

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    104. Re:...and... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It's a product of nationalism as well. Remember Lysenkoism in Russia, which partially was due to Stalin's approval, but there was also a very strong component of being a science invented in the USSR and not in the decadent western world. National pride. In India there's a Hindu nationalist party in power and they seem to be pushing their agenda, as in "invented here, not there".

    105. Re:...and... by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      And landed men on the moon, sent the first probes to Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. Invented the transistor and IC, created Unix and C and managed to turn Japan in to democratic nation and kept Europe for burning to the the ground...
      And we have nukes.

      The United States is a "melting pot" consisting of all (?) nationalities and religions. The BBS Commentary series "The Planets" shows a lot of interviews of what it was like getting to the Moon; many interviews were people of obvious past India nationalities, be it their families moved to the United States or they became US citizens.

      While the United States has a lot to be proud of, it has taken many previous "foreigners" to help it happen.

    106. Re:...and... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Of course if we're going with the myth, everyone in the early American colonies were Puritans and the masses of debtors and criminals shipped here never existed. Of course in Victorian England everyone was upper class as well and totally chaste. And everyone today in Europe is a totally devoted left wing atheist liberal. Nope, class distinctions don't exist or at least can be conveniently ignored.

    107. Re:...and... by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      I still can't follow his logic; but, it doesn't bode well for (what I assume is) the common Russian understanding of Science.

      Replace "Russian" with "80% of humanity" and you'd be closer to the mark. The average person has barely enough critical thinking skills to get by in life. They'll believe anything that makes the world into a simpler place so that they can have the delusion of understanding it all.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    108. Re:...and... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      There are several museums to creationism.

      Presidents for the most part tend to be pushed towards the center as a result of being forced to govern rather than campaign. Even if the opposition claims that they're the most conservative/liberal president that ever existed. Reagan and Dubya were not nearly as hardcore conservative as the popular mythology claims, and certainly far less conservative than the modern Reagan worshippers are. Similarly, Clinton basically reinvented the middle of the road democrat. So if we get another Republican president it's not likely to be from the deranged segment without completely fracturing the party.

      My guess is that it will be a Bush v. Clinton election, which is kind of sad since a country this size should be able to find qualified candidates without relying upon pedigrees like we were some old world aristocracy.

    109. Re:...and... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Hmm, Slashdot always felt more lower-case libertarian than anything else. Which of course, to the conservatives feels too liberal, and to the liberals feels too conservative.

    110. Re:...and... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Politics has always been about Us versus Them. We first have to know what our side believes in before we know what we believe in. Some countries like to put nuances on it though, as in Our Coalition versus Their Coalition. Other countries simplify it to Us versus those in prison because they didn't vote for Us.

    111. Re:...and... by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 1

      Agreed, but self-reporting research by Merck and Pfizer isn't science.

      The corporate conspiracy card doesn't make sense when anti-vaxxers use it, and it doesn't hold water here either. There is plenty of evidence demonstrating the safety and benefits of genetically engineered crops which have been published by independent sources. That the GMO denialists choose to ignore that or act as if big bad Monsanto somehow controls every single thing that goes against their ideology is their own self-made problem.

    112. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Essentially, every country does this - roundabout the time they start to think of themselves as an imperial power.

      The Chinese went through a spate of it about 15-20 years ago. You might recall a flurry of stories out of China about how their ancient scientists invented submarines and aircraft, discovered America, built steam engines, and a bunch of other hooey. Not coincidentally, at the same time we learned of a huge trove of hitherto-obscure scientifically-significant resources, such as dinosaur fossils, located in China. (Remember the velociraptor? Guess where it lived, and when it became popular?)

      Children raised in America learn a lot about what great Americans did and invented, and how important everything about America is. There's even a whole religion (Mormonism) whose entire raison d'etre is to port Christianity into a New World-centric mythos. Children raised in Britain learn about British achievements and discoveries. Children raised in France... and so on.

      What this story tells us is two things. First, that the BJP is starting to turn its attention outwards; it's not actually trying to build an empire yet, but it's laying the groundwork. Second, that some of its members have an inferiority complex about their culture, and feel the need to beef it up with some "science" achievements.

    113. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...state-run universities...

      That's the key phrase. Individualism is the the only antidote to mass insanity and servitude.

    114. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...Bush v. Clinton...

      Both are repellant scions of so called "dynasties" who shit on the majority while pandering to different packs of idiots.
      I stand with Rand.

    115. Re:...and... by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 2

      Mixing GMOs with water fluaridation and vaccination hysteria shows you have no idea what the problems is about GMOs.

      Plant scientist here. It absolutely is.

      The main objection to GMOs isn't that they kill humans directly.

      You're lying, You're not just ignorant, you're actively lying right now. Google the term 'GMO' and you will find tons of such claims very quickly. Hell, Jeffery Smith, one of the most notable anti-GMO activists, claims that GMOs promote AIDS. Acting as if the opposition is not claiming all sorts of bogus health scares is patently deceptive.

      The IP problems surounding GMOs should be enough for slashdot types to reject them.

      What IP problems? The fact that they receive a patent for a certain amount of years? You know, exactly like conventionally bred crops which have no such controversy. Yes, plenty of conventionally bred crops are patented so I guess you oppose conventional breeding too, otherwise you are being pretty selective in your logic. Patents that expire, like Monsanto's first GE soybean patent does in a few months? Or are you referring to the often claimed but completely false myth that Monsanto goes around suing small farmers if they get cross pollinated by GE pollen? Because if so, you don't have a leg to stand on. So tell me, what exactly is wrong with the IP issues surrounding GE crops, and what is your proposed fair alternative?

      Also most GMOs are simply more resistent to pesticides. So more GMOs => more poison in food production.

      This right here is my big problem with the anti-GMO thing. You drop people who know bugger all about agriculture into a topic they don't understand and you get these sorts of misconceptions. Yes, some GE crops are resistant to certain herbicides (the other main type which you conveniently neglected to mention is insect resistant ones which require less insecticides). Sounds bad, I agree, but only because you have been dropped in the middle of a story you haven't been following from the beginning. Okay, you use more of one type of herbicide, like glyphosate or glufosinate, but you can use better weed management practices (like no till farming, which conserves soil nutrients and reduces runoff problems) and you use less of harsher herbicides like atrazine. I'd call that a win. Do you have abetter weed management solution?

      Another argument is, that GMOs have genes inserted that no plant ever could acquire naturally. So we simply have no idea what in the long term will happen with these GMO strains. Most probably nothing, but when the entire food production is at stake, I would be carful.

      An appeal to nature followed by an appeal to ignorance. I hope that's all I need to say about that. You could just as easily make the same claim about vaccines, wifi, fluoride, or damn near anything, and be just as wrong and for the same reasons. Also, you neglect to mention the very careful regulations these things already go through. How about you provide a good reason to suspect GE crops of being potentially intrinsically dangerous, rather than just saying that because I can't all-knowingly prove a negative that your point therefore has merit.

      I hope I've demonstrated why the anti-GMO nonsense is exactly like the anti-vaccine nonsense.

    116. Re: ...and... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      First off, you obviously do not know what east Pakistan was, so I am guessing that you are a fellow american. Google for it Then google for 'Nixon threatens India with nukes over east Pakistan'. Would he have gone to war? Very doubtful. But he let ghandi know that he had parked multiple nukes offshore. Was it a direct threat? Well considering that we had just used 2 of them roughly 25 years earlier...

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    117. Re:...and... by BoogieChile · · Score: 1

      > ...the United States has Creationists and such, but they tend to move in their own circles, and even in academia they are found at private Christian universities...

      ...And in government...

    118. Re:...and... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Then you have politicians that flirt with separatist fringe groups in Texas and in Alaska, simply to get their votes, with absolutely no intention of succession.

      You mean "secession".

      They need to encourage separatist groups in Florida, and get that state to secede. We'd be better off without FloridaMan.

    119. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you blindly think the left is all good or the right is all good ... you're a fucking moron who is driven by ideology and not intellect.

      You ought to define the terms ("left", "right") or not take them seriously, i.e., acknowledge their lack of utility (too relative, too much historical baggage, sketchy and imprecise). Your F-bomb suggests a failure in your chain of logic. One can define the terms in a manner in which that is true (all good/all bad), but there will never be agreement on the usage of the terms with a polarized stalemate.

      The wise course of action is to use words with clearer meanings. I shouldn't have to explain this, but my 'fucking moron' detector went off.

    120. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Which nation is that? Not any of the 102 that signed and ratified the Outer Space Treaty forbidding making claims of the moon, including the US, UK and Russia who signed it two years before man landed on the moon, and probably not the other 26 countries to sign the treaty but not yet ratifying it.

    121. Re:...and... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Whoosh
      I wish that we had a sarcasm tag.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    122. Re:...and... by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 1

      Another potential issue is horizontal gene transfer, that is the ability for genes to be transfered to other species.

      Which has absolutely nothing to do with genetic engineering. HGT happens, indeed it does, it's how we get things like pea aphids with fungus genes and sea slugs with algae genes, but it happens at an extremely small rate, and there is nothing particularly exceptional about a transgene that makes is any more or less to be transferred in such manner. That is a completely nonsensical line of thought that somehow HGT implies we should not use genetically engineered crops.

      In practice, that means that some of those pesticide resistant genes may eventually end up in plants that are supposed to be killed by pesticides.

      In theory, yes, it is possible that an herbicide resistance gene could jump to a weed species. In practice, that's not really a concern. The selection of herbicide resistant weed mutants is a very real and very serious problem, but that is a problem older than genetic engineering, does not occur via horizontal gene transfer, is not a problem intrinstic to GE crops but rather is due to poor resistance management strategies and over reliance (which is not the same as over use) on one mode of action of herbicide, and let me remind you, it is a problem because it threatens the benefits that those herbicide resistant crops already provide. Anti-GMO groups would have you believe that herbicide resistant crops are without benefit while simultaneously saying that herbicide resistant weeds which lessen the benefits of herbicide tolerant GMOs are these world ending 'superweeds'. In other words, they're bad because they have no benefits at all and they're bad because their benefits are diminishing. Talk about having your cake and eating it too.

    123. Re: ...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this racist because the people involved are not white? I'm not seeing the racial connection.

    124. Re: ...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey remember when this thread was about the article? GG slashdot.

    125. Re:...and... by slimshady76 · · Score: 1

      Not in the Continental US, but their support has surely brought enough murders to Irak, Afghanistan, Iran, Palestine...

    126. Re:...and... by That_Dan_Guy · · Score: 1

      Nationalism.

      Every country wants to be the center of the universe and the source of all things that matter. The bigger the country, the more this sort of nationalism gets claimed.

    127. Re: ...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giorgio_A._Tsoukalos......need I say more.

    128. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fascinating.

      More information here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_Aryans

    129. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you mad? Or are you a christian jealot?

    130. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and how many lies the world is told about american "scientists" discovered or invented all kinds of things, when actually it was invented by either Russian scientist or somebody else.
      Perfect example the table of elements. It was invented by a Russian scientist Dmitry Mendeleyev. But americans never and nowhere mention his name.
      Another famous 18th c. Russian scientist, Mikhail Lomonosov. Anybody in US knows him, or credited his name with many discoveries he made ? NO.
      He discovered athmosphere on Venus, freezing of Mercury...and much more.
      Another american lie and making up fairy tale stories about american part in WWII. This is a very dirty lie and shameless crap.
      When Russian Army was fighting germans in Europe for three years, loosing over 20 Million soldiers, america was presenting their army as "heroic", fighting germany (WHAT ??????...where ????). Hollywood was making bunch of filthy crap movies about their "heroic" army. American army ???
      American army was playing games with japanese and loosing them. Was it so important to be in pacific. ??? Crap no. America was funding nazi germany in 1930 thru 1940 and during the war, hoping it will destroy russia. And when they realized that russian army marching all the way to Berlin, then they decided to make a deeeeday movie, loosing thousands of soldiers for nothing. Today america is trying again to destroy Russia. It will backfire as usual. And many people will pay for that.

    131. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your friend is an idiot and moron. He/she know nothing.
      You're saying that no american born managers don't do like he does ??? Gi'me a break....
      It's BULLSHIT!
      America managers do exactly the same, that's why american economy in big shit.
      Only american born managers do exactly the same but in different dirty style, not open like russian manager does.

    132. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, pretty sure your point was to troll.

    133. Re: ...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone has their charlatans. Refer to the recent article in WSJ about science proving the existence of God. In a cesspool, shit rises to the top.

    134. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perfect example the table of elements. It was invented by a Russian scientist Dmitry Mendeleyev. But americans never and nowhere mention his name.

      If that is the perfect example, then who do Americans claim invented the periodic table? Every textbook and science course I had back to grade school said it was Mendeleyev. His story even ends up on TV programs because there is enough of a story behind how he did it to make it more interesting than a name drop. The names that don't get mention are the French, German, and English chemist (and a geologist) who had earlier ideas of a periodic table and even went as far as predicting some elements as missing, because they didn't have as much clout as Mendeleyev to overcome opponents to their ideas.

      Another famous 18th c. Russian scientist, Mikhail Lomonosov. Anybody in US knows him, or credited his name with many discoveries he made ? NO. He discovered athmosphere on Venus, freezing of Mercury...and much more.

      And how often is any person credited with planetary science discoveries short of discovering a new planet or large moon? Or for discovering something mundane like the physical properties of a particular element? His work on the organic nature of things like amber and peat gets him credit in geology where that was a bigger deal.

      making up fairy tale stories ... Hollywood

      Yeah, that is what Hollywood does, makes up stories for entertainment. Americans are taught that when they are small children, but I guess you're just realizing it now. You might want to notice how that happens in every country, with most German movies being fairy tales about Germans, and most Russian movies being fairy tales about Russians. Then you can worry about learning the dates and timing of events during WW2...

    135. Re:...and... by Triklyn · · Score: 1

      ... is it possible for an entire country to troll me?

      this fucking feels like an onion article.

    136. Re:...and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you believe the ancient indian texts, they had them 7000 years go too. And they even used them!

  2. Upper or lower case zero? by rmdingler · · Score: 1
    Given the Indians grasp of all things internet,

    it is not at all surprising that innovations by the many have stolen from them been.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:Upper or lower case zero? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Master Yoda? Is that you?

    2. Re:Upper or lower case zero? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best Doctor I ever had was Indian, in America no less. Hang your Hat on that. And who's to say Ancient peoples didn't play around with some kind of wind-up type full-size planes?. They had plenty of time to do so and plenty of time for all that info to be lost.

  3. The indians also have mastered the art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Of making dense posts in the Internet and in technical forums. I have left too many technical forums because there is no patience for the multitude of posts "I don't know how to this simple task, poor of me, do my job for me"

    1. Re:The indians also have mastered the art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I made a heat transfer calculation webapp some years back for a undergrad research project. After the first several emails from Chinese and Indian grad students asking for my source code because it could help them with their own projects I stopped even bothering to read questions about the program.

    2. Re:The indians also have mastered the art by msauve · · Score: 0

      I have left too many technical forums because there is no patience for the multitude of posts "I don't know how to this simple task, poor of me, do my job for me"

      You do know that you're screwing up everyone's tech support by doing that, don't you? How else is that call center agent going to answer a technical question, unless they can in turn outsource it to the Internet?

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    3. Re:The indians also have mastered the art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They also have an amusing way of expressing themselves sometimes. I don't mean their accent. A few years ago, I attended a presentation by an Indian guy about some software testing infrastructure. It was your run-of-the-mill, boring presentation, that was putting the audience to sleep. And then, all of a sudden, the fellow, in all earnestness, comes up with the following gem: "And the results are copacetic." I and most of the audience winced, suddenly brought up to life. But ever since I haven't forgotten the meaning of that word, which I had to look up immediately after the presentation.

    4. Re:The indians also have mastered the art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I manage a team of 8 offshore developers. This is pretty much my entire work week, aside from cringing at the blasphemy I find in my pull requests.

    5. Re:The indians also have mastered the art by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Can you explain what's wrong with the word to a non-native English speaker? I haven't ever seen it before, but looking at its dictionary definition, it seems to be a legitimate word in that context.

    6. Re:The indians also have mastered the art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You stupid ignorant Western fool with your head in your arse.
      Indian engineers from even the so-called low quality colleges are now starting great companies right out of college. It is just a matter of time before we superpower the shit out of your lazy American nerds before you can say 'and they have nukes!'. You and your stupid racist memes.

      Go ahead, mod my truthful rant as troll.

    7. Re:The indians also have mastered the art by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      It is just a matter of time before we superpower the shit out of your lazy American nerds

      Hey, no fair! I'm not an American nerd, it's just discrimination if I miss out on getting my shit superpowered out by you!

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    8. Re:The indians also have mastered the art by BradleyUffner · · Score: 2

      Can you explain what's wrong with the word to a non-native English speaker? I haven't ever seen it before, but looking at its dictionary definition, it seems to be a legitimate word in that context.

      It's very out of place. It's like seeing a text message from your 85 year old grandmother saying "YOLO!"

    9. Re:The indians also have mastered the art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its an informal bit of slang. I guess the post you are asking about just felt that informal slang was out of place in a presentation. I think it wasn't that big a deal.

    10. Re:The indians also have mastered the art by Garfong · · Score: 1

      To expand on the other reply: It's out of place for a technical discussion because it's a very uncommonly used word -- at least I didn't know the meaning before I looked it up. Whereas in a technical discussion you tend to keep vocabulary reasonably straight forward (I think I heard Grade 9 level once) since the goal is to express technical information clearly, not impress your listeners with flowery vocabulary.

    11. Re:The indians also have mastered the art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Copacetic is a fairly common word. It's not particularly flowery language.
      It was out of place because the style of conversation in which you would use the word copacetic does not match a technical presentation.

      copacetic is used when you want to explain that everthing is 'A-Ok' and there are no 'problems'.
      If after a fight with someone you said, 'its ok, we are copacetic' that would be a typical usage.
      So to say a program, is 'copacetic' is a bit of a stretch and certainly not a technical measure.
      Its more often used a lot like 'were cool', or, "all ops running smoothly, so everything is copacetic".

      Would you say, "when the program finishes the results are all cool"?

    12. Re:The indians also have mastered the art by As_I_Please · · Score: 1

      "Copacetic" is a perfectly fine word. It's just very rarely used. A native speaker would only use it to show off that they know the word. Other examples: peripatetic and callipygian.

  4. Why do they have that red dot on their heads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To make them easier to find for a laser guided drone strike!

  5. Plastic surgery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Elephant in the room...

  6. hysterical by Cardoor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    lord ganesha proof of plastic surgery?? rarely do i found abject ignorance so funny. but this is gold!!

    1. Re:hysterical by NotDrWho · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm just wondering if anyone has actually verified that "Mr. Harsh Vardhan" isn't actually Sacha Baron Cohen in disguise.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    2. Re:hysterical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lord ganesha proof of plastic surgery?? rarely do i found abject ignorance so funny. but this is gold!!

      I know right? Especially when it's REALLY proof of their prior advanced genetic engineering. Plastic surgery my ass...

    3. Re:hysterical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lord Ganesha mistakes the letters "BS" in an ancient text thinking it stood for "Bygone Science".
      Actually "BS" stood for "Bull Shit".
      He couldn't really be a serious, is he trying to be a stand-up comic ?

    4. Re:hysterical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You only say that because Lord Ganesha's "after" pics showing off his lovely breast implants, are suppressed by the media.

    5. Re:hysterical by Charliemopps · · Score: 2, Insightful

      lord ganesha proof of plastic surgery?? rarely do i found abject ignorance so funny. but this is gold!!

      It is not that crazy if you actually think about it for long...
      In India, people with severe facial deformities are often revered as profits or some such:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Now, I don't know about intentionally making yourself look like an Elephant with plastic surgery... but there are certainly many cases of people ending up with a natural resemblance to having the head of an elephant. It is not beyond the realm of possibility that at some time in the very distant past that a cult popped up around someone with a deformity like this and it just so happened his ideas caught on and turned into modern Hinduism.

      If I get re-incarnated into a fly, I'll do my best to retract this statement.

    6. Re:hysterical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is worse? To believe that actually exists some deity with an elephant face on a human body, or to believe that some ancient form of plastic surgery has gone awry? Many forms of body modification is done long before science or modern medicine.

      Mind you, in my country there's more people who believe that a man was born out of a virgin than that the mankind has managed to land on the moon. People, as a general rule, are idiot.

    7. Re:hysterical by Cardoor · · Score: 1

      representations of deities as men with animal parts are deliberate attempts to communicate messages in a language/medium which a normal person can receive - albeit perhaps at a level initially somewhat unconscious. a modest exploration of of myth and symbology should make this clear.

    8. Re:hysterical by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      If he next says his favorite game is "throw the muslim down the well" we'll know for sure.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    9. Re:hysterical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was probably some rich prince who suffered from elephantitis!

    10. Re:hysterical by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Another theory is that the ancient Egyptians were a bunch of furrys.

    11. Re:hysterical by GNious · · Score: 1

      In India, people with severe facial deformities are often revered as profits

      Not sure if typo ...

    12. Re:hysterical by Cardoor · · Score: 1

      rule 34 of the ancient world.. if you can think it.. there's a hieroglyph of it

  7. Greeks by Extremus · · Score: 5, Funny

    The greeks got the credit, but lost them some years ago due to economic difficulties. The common wisdom now is that the Pythagorean theorem have been discovered by an anonymous hedge fund.

    1. Re:Greeks by NotDrWho · · Score: 4, Funny

      I understand that Northrop Grumman recently acquired the patents to the Pythagorean theorem after a ruling from a federal judge in the eastern district of Texas--after promising said judge a chance to fly a B-2 bomber all by his very self and a 2-scoop ice cream cone afterwards if he was a good boy.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    2. Re:Greeks by geantvert · · Score: 1

      And using the new official value of PI=3, Alabama scientists just discovered that the Pythagorean theorem could be simplified to c = a + b

    3. Re:Greeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, bad-mouth Alabama mathematicians all you want to. But they're doing cutting edge work down there. They've already issued a groundbreaking proof that c + b = trucker.

    4. Re:Greeks by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      Alabama scientists just discovered that the Pythagorean theorem could be simplified to c = a + b

      Surely scientists in Manhattan would have discovered that :)

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    5. Re:Greeks by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      The sad thing is that you could actually get a patent on the Pythagorean theorem approved if you reformulate it in a circuitous way.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    6. Re:Greeks by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Have some shameless self-promotion... might finally have found someone who can figure out how to play this: http://birds-are-nice.me/VoroW...

    7. Re: Greeks by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      Given the existence of Rocket City Alabama was perhaps not the best choice for denigration. In fact, any of the surrounding states would have been better examples.

  8. Coming soon to another episode of Ancient Aliens by gewalker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And the ancient planes also had the ability to fly between planets too. Don't think that these claims will stand up to review.

    Ancient peoples were just as smart as us, but you need time to build the necessary tech. base in order to make advanced equipment so that you can discover advanced scientific theories and engineering disciplines.

  9. If they were so smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they were so smart, then why did they forget all of these important advancements?

    1. Re:If they were so smart by NotDrWho · · Score: 2

      The evil white colonial devil must have MADE them forget, obviously!

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  10. IMPOSSIBLE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They couldn't have invented the airplane 7000 years ago... the earth is only 6000 years old!

    Though had they invented it at the beginning of time then it does explain how they could survive Noah's flood.

  11. As an Indian; knew this was inevitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Indian politics has a long history of using pseudo science to sway the gullible. Many years ago, we had a veteran politician getting farmers to agitate against dams claiming that the dams removed the electricity from the water, so when it reached the fields it did not have any electricity left. The lack of electricity was affecting the quality of the crops.
    The creationist museum here in the US where I currently stay is the US version of the same thing. The use of "common sense" and "the written word of God" to counter empirical, evidence driven hard science.
    The problem as I see it is that in the name of defending religion, we are required to unquestioningly suspend all argument and reason when reading religious texts. It is a very short step to suspend all argument and reason when listening to the people who hold themselves as defenders of these texts.

    1. Re:As an Indian; knew this was inevitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Religion is not the problem. Fundamentalists of any stripe are.

    2. Re:As an Indian; knew this was inevitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Many years ago, we had a veteran politician getting farmers to agitate against dams claiming that the dams removed the electricity from the water, so when it reached the fields it did not have any electricity left. The lack of electricity was affecting the quality of the crops.

      Did they try using Brawndo? It's got the electrolytes that plants crave.

    3. Re:As an Indian; knew this was inevitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I can tell you as a Christian, I have not seen anything in science which is disputed by the Bible."

      Please quote experiments that prove what's in the book is true.

    4. Re:As an Indian; knew this was inevitable by bobbied · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would refine that a bit further. It's not just Fundamentalists, but Fundamentalists who refuse to accept that others may hold differing opinions, and further, those Fundamentalists who believe it is justified to use force to change the opinions of others.

      I consider myself a fundamentalist, but I do not believe it is my job to force anyone into accepting my views, and I would defend your right to hold positions I consider incorrect.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    5. Re:As an Indian; knew this was inevitable by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

      I disagree... I can't speak for India, but here in the US people really do believe this stuff. Not only that, but many of the politicians we have in office are true believers and again truly believe this stuff. It's not always just some cynical attempt to manipulate people (though in some cases it is.)

      This is why there should be a firm separation of Church and state. Religion is by defiance something that rejects evidence and relies solely on faith. As such, anyone can come along, reject all reasonable arguments and declare that they have faith that their own opinion on the matter is fact because God says so. You may be able to run your spiritual life that way, but not your physical one.

    6. Re:As an Indian; knew this was inevitable by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      And that is why we need to defend our right to question, challenge and where necessary mock and ridicule religion. Let people believe and preach what they want, but don't ask us to respect or defend it, tolerance is sufficient. Yet more and more people feel they need to, or are forced to tiptoe around issues sensitive to religion. Especially here in Europe where there's a much weaker tradition of free speech and an unholy alliance between muslims noisily demanding respect and christians silently nodding their approval.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    7. Re:As an Indian; knew this was inevitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can tell you as a Christian, I have not seen anything in science which is disputed by the Bible.

      As an example, Joshua 10:13 describes an event that, if literally true, would have invoked forces that would have scoured land based life from the earth. I have yet to hear what the common metaphorical reading of that text is.

      The Bible doesn't so much dispute science, as ignore principles we've since discovered, outright. The ancient authors of the text may not have known what they were implying, but our modern day proponents certainly should, and that stabs to the heart of what the GP is saying.

      Finally, I'll just say that getting your knowledge of God from Hollywood, media, politicians, or what a "friend" told you, is not a very scientific approach in itself. Maybe something like Lee Strobel's "The Case for Christ" would be a good place to start.

      No, not Strobel. He's a pastor and author, but not a scientist. If one insists on a scientific view of the Bible, that's no more 'scientific' than 'Hollywood, media, politicians, or what a "friend" told you'.

      The Bible is better studied in a historical rather than a scientific context, anyway.

    8. Re:As an Indian; knew this was inevitable by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      "Many years ago, we had a veteran politician getting farmers to agitate against dams claiming that the dams removed the electricity from the water, so when it reached the fields it did not have any electricity left. The lack of electricity was affecting the quality of the crops."

      Send that politician to Europe. He could make Chancellor in Germany with ease.

    9. Re:As an Indian; knew this was inevitable by geantvert · · Score: 1

      Your comment would be more appropriate if he add written "I have not seen anything in the Bible which is disputed by science."

      Anyways, the bible has been used for ages as a source of arguments against science. The most famous are of course
          - Evolution can't be true because all animals and men were created by gods in 7 days.
          - The universe is not older than 6000 years because the bible gives a detailed chronology since Adam.
          - PI=3 because "And he [Hiram] made a molten sea, ten cubits from the one rim to the other it was round all about, and...a line of thirty cubits did compass it round about....And it was an hand breadth thick...." — First Kings, chapter 7, verses 23 and 26.

      I suspect that the last one was never really used as an argument for PI=3 but it is so fun :-)

      Every few months I spend a few hours browsing through creationist web sites. This can be both very funny and depressing.

    10. Re:As an Indian; knew this was inevitable by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      I can tell you as a Christian, I have not seen anything in science which is disputed by the Bible.

      How about not being able to stop the rotation of the Earth in a non-destructive manner?

    11. Re:As an Indian; knew this was inevitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tolerance is sufficient

      Quite. The problem is - and I hate to go ahead and - like everyone else on Slashdot - boil this down to left vs. right, but...

      We have no actual tolerance in US society. Tolerance has mutated merely into a byword for, "Don't you dare hurt anybody's feelings!"

      So, you've got the left butthurt whenever someone blurts out, "lol u have a penis, ur a dood".

      You've got the right butthurt whenever someone blurts out, "ur sky daddy buggers alter boys".

      And everyone seems happy to insist it's okay to verbally abuse one group but not another (with which groups are okay to bash and which are not being the only real difference), while ignoring the fact that nowhere in our Constitution or Bill of Rights is there a Right to Remain Unoffended. Granted, it might fall under the all powers clause, but I'd argue the First takes precedence as it's explicit.

      In closing, Hitler did nothing wrong, except believe the Earth was created by dinosaurs ten thousand years ago. U mad homofags?

    12. Re:As an Indian; knew this was inevitable by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      The problem with the Pi=3 thing is that a cubit isn't an exact measure, and is not meant to be taken as an exact. The rest of the arguments are people misunderstanding stories as being stories, not fact. The creation myth actually appears multiple times in the bible, all a bit different, so if you want to take the bible as fact, which one is the fact?

      The pope himself has said that evolution is right, it doesn't disagree with the Catholic religion.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    13. Re:As an Indian; knew this was inevitable by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Except that Christianity as a whole does not make those claims. Only subset of Christianity. In particular the literalist interpretations of the Bible that assume 7 days is equal to the modern 168 hours for example. And yes, the last one has been used as an argument before.

      There are groups that trust the King James Bible version over newer translations, but that doesn't mean all of Christianity agrees with them. On the other hand we have Christian founded and run colleges who do a very good job at education and a good job at science.

  12. Indians Should Follow Microsoft Model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of claiming they created works that others got "credit" for, they should "revise and extend" like Microsoft does, then claim they "made major important improvements" to those "old works".

  13. I'm scared. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We may poke lots of fun at this (and I do from time to time), but watching fundamentalists right and left (Christian fundamentalists in the USA and elsewhere, neoliberal fundamentalists, Islamic fundamentalists, Hindu fundamentalists, whatnot) doing their version of "science" has me very scared.

    We're heading towards dark times, it seems.

    1. Re: I'm scared. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right on, brother.

    2. Re:I'm scared. by the+gnat · · Score: 1

      Why is this necessarily any worse than in the past? In the 20th century, countries run by insane fundamentalist cults managed to make some very impressive technological advances that could easily have been used to enslave the world if they'd happened a few years earlier. The fact that these cults weren't technically "religious" is irrelevant - they were driven by absolute conviction, blind faith, and messianic pretensions, and willing to use any amount of violence to propagate their worldview. Remarkably, the planet survived.

      (The encouraging aspect of this is that both cults had some wholly unscientific blind spots that helped cripple them in the long term - for instance, the denigration of certain areas of physics as "Jewish Physics", and the mass exodus of Jewish scientists from 1930s Germany, which were among the many reasons that the US had nukes before Germany did.)

  14. Miscategorized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is labeled "Science" but was miscategorized. It should be under "It's funny. Laugh."

  15. The number 0 is attributed to India... by cardpuncher · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... but I guess a paper entitled "Indians Invented Nothing" might not be selected for presentation.

  16. Are you sure this isn't... by DavidHumus · · Score: 2

    ...the Indian "Science" Conference ?

  17. If they were so smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, documentation is legendary in Indian code.

    The inventions were obviously self documenting

  18. Science? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sort of disgusted this wasn't filed under humor where it belongs.

  19. Next thing you know... by Sprite_tm · · Score: 1

    ...they're going to dig for copper cabling that's thousands of years old, to prove they had a phone network before everyone else. When they don't find any, they'll conclude the only reason for that can be that they moved to mobile phones even back then!

    1. Re:Next thing you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They invented telepathy. Smart phones are primitive modern constructions.

    2. Re:Next thing you know... by TwoUtes · · Score: 2

      No, they had long since pulled up the copper and replaced it with glass fiber, which has since turned back to sand.

    3. Re:Next thing you know... by MiniMike · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...they're going to dig for copper cabling that's thousands of years old,

      I have some Verizon cables in my neighborhood that seem like they might qualify.

  20. Did ancient Indians invent racism too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because that caste system is still going strong today.

    1. Re: Did ancient Indians invent racism too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember, there is a line of reasoning that the social chasimr is much older. Even the beginning of the bible tells of castes. Clean and unclean. Referring to humans and animals. But not in reference to beasts of the forest, the early accounts of the babalonians tell of slaves of this master, showing it was common then. All societies had those who because of their "badness" were deemed rulers of the world. Now they just have to lie and cheat to do it. And, why is it allowed to happen? If the world rose up against them, the 1%?

  21. Who cares. by Rizgar · · Score: 1

    People have be fighting over algebra for centuries, it's old we get it. What have you done for me lately!

    1. Re:Who cares. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What have you done for me lately!

      (male voice) My name is Peggy, how may I assist you today? Have you tried turning it off and back on?

    2. Re:Who cares. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't ask what they have done for you... ask what you can do for India!

  22. Re:Coming soon to another episode of Ancient Alien by war4peace · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's also proven that ancient people mastered the art of wireless communication. The lack of wire traces is definite proof.

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  23. kim jong il science advisor by hagnat · · Score: 2

    so, after kim jong il died his science advisor was hired by the indians
    so, what's next ? unicorns or yeti's ?

    --
    "life is a joke, and someone is laughing at me"
    1. Re:kim jong il science advisor by mandark1967 · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's "Yeticorns", you insensitive clod! You should know they invented gene-splicing thousands of years before anyone else.

      --
      Sig Follows: "Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." -- Mark Twain
    2. Re:kim jong il science advisor by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Googling confirms it!. Yes, stuffed animals of a "Yeticorn" do exist.

      Ok, enough Internet for me today.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  24. And ? by aepervius · · Score: 2

    I mean other countries had president which believed in an apocalyptic religion (revelation) or that atheist should not given the right to vote. Being from outside, the apocalyptic believer make me far more fear than the plane-to-other-planet Veda believer.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  25. ..take the poo to the loo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://blogs.unicef.org/2014/04/25/one-billion-people-still-cant-take-poo-to-the-loo/

  26. Give it a rest by msobkow · · Score: 0

    Ok. Indian culture has been around a long time. We get that.

    But outrageous claims like this just make them look like attention seeking IDIOTS.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  27. Re: Coming soon to another episode of Ancient Alie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never seen gold in a quartz crystal, almost wireline. Hehh!.almost snorted my coffee.

  28. Not equivalent by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    Well to be fair, I could buy the Pythagorean Theorem thing, that could have been discovered and forgotten, only to be dug up later. But the aviation claim is ridiculous, especially when one reads the rest of the claim where the vehicles could visit other planets.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    1. Re:Not equivalent by wisnoskij · · Score: 0

      Actually, I would buy both (except for the other planet thing). Asia was about a thousand years ahead of the rest of the word. They invented most of the math before the West reinvented it. I would even go so far as to say, I am fairly confident that some Asian, long before the Write brothers, had a decent working flying machine. But at the time before all these other inventions, it would of simply been a curiosity and plaything, with no real use, so would of been quickly forgotten. There are very few things that were not first invented in Asia, how many of those happened in India, I would not hazard a guess.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    2. Re:Not equivalent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is one thing if they maybe developed gliders or balloons, as that had been done long before Write brothers in a few places. But powered, heavier than air flight requires quite an advance in engine and/or material knowledge to produce something strong and light enough to work. If they had the power supply to accomplish that, they should have been able to use it elsewhere without much thought and there would have been an industrial revolution of some sort, or at least a drastic change in warfare.

    3. Re:Not equivalent by Jhon · · Score: 1

      " I am fairly confident that some Asian, long before the Write brothers, had a decent working flying machine."

      And it wouldn't matter if they had. The Wright brothers are the fathers of modern aviation. Period. It doesn't matter that the Vikings may have "discovered" the Americas centuries before Columbus -- or the Chinese centuries before that. What matters is who "discovered" it last and in a way where the discovery "stuck".

    4. Re:Not equivalent by SecurityGuy · · Score: 1

      There's a rather vast gulf between saying such a thing COULD happen because Asia had advanced math before the West, and presenting evidence that such a thing actually did happen.

      It's Wright, by the way. Sounds the same as write, but it's spelled differently.

    5. Re:Not equivalent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wright Brothers.

    6. Re:Not equivalent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is why when the primitive westerners came with their inferior technology, the east easily repelled them....wait.

    7. Re:Not equivalent by sudon't · · Score: 1

      ...it would of simply been a curiosity and plaything, with no real use, so would of been quickly forgotten.

      Nothing that can be turned to the purpose of killing people has ever been forgotten. A flying apparatus would be big news at any point in history. Obviously, without an engine of some sort, the best you could achieve would be a glider of some sort.

      --
      -- sudon't

      Air-ride Equipped

    8. Re:Not equivalent by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Well did the wright brothers not use pedaling power? but yes, either way the glider comes first.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    9. Re:Not equivalent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their first powered flight was with an custom internal combustion engine, in particular one that was relatively lightweight for it time and not something that would have been possible many years earlier than that (short of someone developing and learning several decades of work themselves). Human powered flight was not until about 50 years ago, involved considerable advances in materials to make things light enough, required a very fit athlete to use, and couldn't carry any thing beyond the pilot.

  29. Re:Coming soon to another episode of Ancient Alien by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

    It's also proven that ancient people mastered the art of wireless communication. /blockquote.

    And so they did. Those big signal fires didn't have much bandwidth, but they still worked pretty well.

  30. Re:Coming soon to another episode of Ancient Alien by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the ancient planes also had the ability to fly between planets too. Don't think that these claims will stand up to review.

    Oh I'm sure all of this actually happened. If ancient philosophers smoked the right substances they probably did visit other worlds.

  31. The usual populism from India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SInce the Indian government has historically been unable to provide basic services (running water, electricity, sanitation) to a large percentage of its citizens (a percentage which is now equivalent to more than 500 million people) it is resorting to the oldest page in the book: cheap populism based on unsubstantiated notions.

  32. Reality vs nonsense by JavaBear · · Score: 1

    The more reality diminishes the realm of nonsense, the more subscribers to nonsense will fight back with increasingly extraordinary claims, demanding they be taken at face value.

    1. Re:Reality vs nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it's the seriousness of the charge that matters.

  33. Et Tu? by rmdingler · · Score: 1
    Yoda! Clearly Ganesha minus two arms and a trunk.

    Another Western plagiarism of Indian prior art.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:Et Tu? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only an incompetent plagiarist would forget the arms and trunk.
      Another proof of the incompetent West!

    2. Re:Et Tu? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Avatar is an Indian term, the director of star wars and Avatar was deeply influenced by Indian civilisation. Yoda = Yodha = warrior in Sanskrit/Hindi. Amercians just know how to plagiarize without understanding anything

  34. Citation needed by bytesex · · Score: 0

    Article seems like a bunch of selective quoting in order to make someone look bad. An anecdote by a speaker, a confused musing by some scientist, and all of a sudden we have faux science created by unabashed nationalism. Right.

    --
    Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    1. Re:Citation needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am an Indian. The prime minister said that in no uncertain terms and its on record. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NeIWu1NLuzE

  35. I'm Feeling deflated by /. readership racism by mrthoughtful · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nearly every comment on this article deviates from 'really bad peer reviews' into racist bigotry. Shame on you lot.

    --
    This comment was written with the intention to opt out of advertising.
    1. Re:I'm Feeling deflated by /. readership racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone remember the episode of Equinox in the UK about twenty years ago about the Indian Rationalists Association? Was quite a memorable show because a) It was brilliant with them taking on fake gurus etc. and b) Their initials IRA were the same as our not so friendly Irish Republican terrorist group.

    2. Re:I'm Feeling deflated by /. readership racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a difference between "This negative trait is correlated with this race." and "This negative trait is caused by this race.". So far, I haven't seen any comments that fall clearly into the second category.

    3. Re:I'm Feeling deflated by /. readership racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to Slashdot.org! Please enjoy your stay!

    4. Re:I'm Feeling deflated by /. readership racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You sound Indian.

    5. Re:I'm Feeling deflated by /. readership racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Indian coworkers explained to me that wild conspiracy theories are common in the mainstream press and that it is just part of their culture. They don't necessarily believe it to be true.

    6. Re:I'm Feeling deflated by /. readership racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    7. Re:I'm Feeling deflated by /. readership racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nearly every comment on this article deviates from 'really bad peer reviews' into racist bigotry. Shame on you lot.

      You are painting the label of racist bigots on all of slashdot with a broad brush. I believe there is a word for that sort of behavior right inside your post.

    8. Re:I'm Feeling deflated by /. readership racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      weasel words. "nearly every"? c'mon. please point out the racism and provide
      some numbers, or it's just bullshit.

    9. Re:I'm Feeling deflated by /. readership racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're only allowed to have fun at the expense of one specific demographic these days: Caucasian, Christian, heterosexual males. Everyone else is too downtrodden already.

    10. Re:I'm Feeling deflated by /. readership racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot was always a haven for embittered sexless basement dwelling pasty-white nerds with a hilarious ignorance of society and the world and always ready to blame their ills on some third world shit-hole of a country.

    11. Re:I'm Feeling deflated by /. readership racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a third world cesspool, it has nothing to do with race.

      Have you read any news from India in the last couple years that isn't about their negative impact to our unemployment rate or gang rape including organized groups targeting tourists to kidnap and rape? Lovely country.

  36. Re:Coming soon to another episode of Ancient Alien by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being Light years ahead they used FTL communications. We just haven't got up to speed with them yet.

  37. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    North Carolina to reissue license plates. We're now "Second In Flight".

    1. Re:In other news... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 3, Informative

      I was wondering when NC would stop promoting cowardice on its license plates.

  38. Don't forget the British royal family by Vintermann · · Score: 4, Funny

    The British royal family. They all live in the same family house together - Indian. All work in the family business - Indian. All have arranged marriages - Indian. They all have sons; daughters no good - Indian. Children live with their parents until they are married - Indian!

    Except Prince Charles. He's African.

    --
    xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    1. Re:Don't forget the British royal family by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, theyre just Germans

  39. troll by pastafazou · · Score: 0

    nt

  40. Re:Coming soon to another episode of Ancient Alien by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

    Or, you know, talking.

  41. Heck of a country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mastered aviation. Good. And geometry, evn better. Now if they could only master indoor plumbing they'd be a heck of a country.

    1. Re:Heck of a country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they did 5000 years ago
      http://www.sewerhistory.org/gr...
      then forgot about it as not important

  42. Re:Coming soon to another episode of Ancient Alien by war4peace · · Score: 1

    "A shoutout to my buddy Prakash!"

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  43. Re:Actually... by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

    Nuclear war that destroyed a civilization would probably leave some kind of trace, as would a civilization that advanced. The burden of proof would lie with those making such an outrageous claim.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  44. I, for one, welcome our new vedic overlords by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 1

    Especially that new exhaust system.

  45. Re:Coming soon to another episode of Ancient Alien by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the ancient planes also had the ability to fly between planets too. Don't think that these claims will stand up to review.

    I call BS! It's been proven that Xenu, Overlord of the Galactic Confederacy, brought billions of his people in an old, beat up DC-8 to Earth, over 75 million years ago, just to blow them up with a nuke while they were strapped to a volcano. Ask your body Thetans, they'll tell you it's true!

  46. science outmatch joke by hagnat · · Score: 2

    this reminds me of a joke...
    scientists around the world were trying to figure out which was the most advanced in the past
    so, the french dig a deep hole and found some copper string, and claimed that they had invented the telephone 1000 years ago
    the english dug an even deeper hole and found some glass shards, and claimed that they had invented fiberglass wires 2000 years ago
    the portuguese dug an absurdly deep hole, and found NOTHING

    so they claimed that they invented wireless cellphone 6000 years ago

    --
    "life is a joke, and someone is laughing at me"
  47. Re:Coming soon to another episode of Ancient Alien by Richy_T · · Score: 1

    And let's not forget the clacks.

  48. LOL by WindBourne · · Score: 1, Informative

    There are plenty of you right wing idiots here joining right up with the left wing idiots.
    No wonder America is in such horrible shape.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:LOL by ilparatzo · · Score: 2

      Idiocy spans all political parties, countries, religions, scientific circles and humanity as a whole. One man's genius is another man's idiot. And today's genius may find that they are tomorrow's idiot and vice-versa.

      But I would argue that much of the problem is with the name calling (or idiot calling in this case) as much as anything else. When we wage our intellectual battles by calling each other names meant to degrade and or trivialize, we are just as much of an "idiot" as those who seek to harm.

  49. Sadly yes by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Look at how liberals hate nukes without a thought of how to deal with all of the waste.
    Likewise, they back the science on AGW (good), but then come up with solutions in which they tell the world's largest polluter to go ahead and double in size, while telling the ENTIRE WEST, which emits less than China does, to cut their emissions.

    And none of that speaks about how anti-science the GOP has become.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Sadly yes by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      the ENTIRE WEST, which emits less than China does

      West of where? China and the US emit roughly the same amount in total tonnage, the US alone emits 3-4X that of China on a per-capita basis. The west is almost single handedly responsible for the current excess in the atmosphere since both China and India did not have large carbon footprints until recent decades.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    2. Re:Sadly yes by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      ENTIRE WEST, which emits less than China does, to cut their emissions.
      That is wrong.
      China just overtook the USA as the biggest emitter less than a year ago.
      All western nations together emmit still far more than twice than China does. And then comes Russia and the rest of the developing world.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    3. Re:Sadly yes by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      LOL.
      America is less than 14%. China passed America clear back in 2006. Right now, China, with bad calculations, emits ~1/3 of the world's total emissions.
      With America being less than 14%, Europe at 13%, Japan at 3%, along with Canada, Australia and South Korea emit less than 31%.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    4. Re:Sadly yes by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Do you even bother reading the reports? The entire WEST is less than China, and that was in 2012.
      America: 5.10 billion tonnes:
      Europe 27: 4.01 billion tonnes:
      Japan: 1.26 billion tonnes:
      Canada: .53
      Australia: .36 billion tonnes
      And that adds up to 11,26 billion tonnes

      What is China in 2012? 9.86 billion tonnes.
      Note that the above was 2012. Each year since then, China has increased, while the west, except Japan and Germany, have decreased. China exceeded the west in 2013, and will do more so in 2014.

      And much better measure then per capita is emissions per GDP.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    5. Re:Sadly yes by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Strange, the news than China passed America (USA) was around 2011 or 2012 even, it was big news even here on /. But perhaps the "news about that" was late and came only 2012, at least it was very recent.
      Interesting read about 2014 ... https://germanwatch.org/en/dow... USA on rank 41 of the "best performing CO2 reduction countries" ...
      However I see now clear numbers are not easy to get: http://www.ucsusa.org/global_w... here it says China produced 27% of the worlds emissions in 2011 (USA 17%)!
      And here it says USA and China changed leadership 2006 (as you said): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G...
      Here it is even claimed that basically all nations (except the eU in total, no breakdown by country however) increased their CO2 output in the recent years: http://co2now.org/Current-CO2/... -- which I find hard to believe.
      Anyway, the USA still seem to be around 16% share of world wide CO2 production, not 14%, interesting read about various changes the recent years: http://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  50. How about this by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Can you imagine a country where the leaders preach that women have natural defenses against rape, having nukes? You wouldn't credit such a country with having electricity.

    It is not just cream that rices to the top.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  51. Re:Coming soon to another episode of Ancient Alien by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    It's also proven that ancient people mastered the art of wireless communication. The lack of wire traces is definite proof.

    - you make it sound as if all of it was just smoke and mirrors...

  52. Same, same, same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems that India has a Grand Old Party as well, complete with their storybooks and illusions of grandeur.

  53. the internet by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 0

    And they invented the Internet before Al Gore did, too!

  54. Yeah, right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the Irish invented civilization, drank a bunch of Guiness and forgot where they put it! Now, on to the show!

  55. Re:Coming soon to another episode of Ancient Alien by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    Actually, they were smarter than us, because there was no internet to easily spread dis- and misinformation so far and wide so quickly.

  56. original papers available translated to english by lkcl · · Score: 1, Funny

    here is an english translation of the papers: http://www.bibliotecapleyades....

    random moderators: BEFORE considering hitting "-1" please read the full text below.

    if you look up the papers they apparently had mercury-based plasma ion drives (which i hear NASA and the JPL have been researching for some time) as well as highly destructuve beam weapons (which i hope *nobody* in modern times has been researching). the papers are thousands of years old, and have been well-known for a considerable amount of time, mostly for the metallurgy as the papers go through absolutely every single detail required, from sourcing the materials to creating the crucibles and kilns, to making the garments needed to deal with altitude. there's a story on the internet that someone in india, during victorian times, actually recreated one of these machines, directly from the instructions. when the british heard about it they had it destroyed.

    doing a quick google search.... yes, this is the vedic "vimanas" being presented at this conference: it's actually nothing "new", it's just that peoples' reactions are... well, if one wants to put it charitably, it's just surrounded with an amazing amount of incredulity and disbelief, but if we are honest the better way to put it is that it is absolute pure arrogance to think that our current level of technology is the first and only peak of technological capability on the planet: it's just that we are far more connected now than we were before, so word of new discoveries tends to get around.

    that "incredulity" you can counteract by simply reviewing the documents for yourself. i recommend focussing on the sections covering the science that *has* been re-discovered since the techniques were lost, for example the mining and metallurgy sections. once you have at least verified that these sections correspond precisely with modern techniques, is it so hard a stretch of one's mind to consider that the other sections and instructions might be correct as well?

    1. Re:original papers available translated to english by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To some degree, I can accept "lost technology." A claim that the Indians had some metallurgical technique that was lost and rediscovered by Europeans? I can buy that. I'd still require proof, but I can accept that this might happen. Primitive glider-type airplanes developed by Indians thousands of years ago? This is getting more far fetched and requires more proof, but perhaps someone there made one glider that worked for one flight. Advanced planes with the capability for space-flight to other planets? Sorry, but I'm not buying it. If you want to prove this, you'll need a lot more than "it's written down in some text somewhere." (If written text counts as proof then a thousand years from now there will be proof that Americans had galaxy-wide space-flight capability in the 20th Century thanks to some sci-fi stories.)

      Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. Indians a thousand years ago having modern or even futuristic technology that was lost without a trace save for writing in one book (which might be open to interpretation) is *NOT* extraordinary proof.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    2. Re:original papers available translated to english by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Our lead emissions have left a trace in ice cores. As has our industrial production of CO2. We've got radar-trackable space junk in graveyard orbit that isn't going to go anywhere for millions of years. Our nuclear tests have left detectable traces of long-lived isotopes in ice cores too. If there had been any advanced industrial civilisation in the last hundred thousand years, we'd have found it.

    3. Re:original papers available translated to english by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there's a story on the internet that someone in india, during victorian times, actually recreated one of these machines, directly from the instructions. when the british heard about it they had it destroyed.

      And why hasn't anyone built any of these things since? Why doesn't any one build these now? If it were a matter of following instructions and someone did it on their own at one point a century or so ago, then it should be straightforward to crank out a prototype now.

    4. Re:original papers available translated to english by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
      No they don't.
      Any 'ordinary' proof is just enough!

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    5. Re:original papers available translated to english by lkcl · · Score: 1

      To some degree, I can accept "lost technology." A claim that the Indians had some metallurgical technique that was lost and rediscovered by Europeans? I can buy that. I'd still require proof, but I can accept that this might happen. Primitive glider-type airplanes developed by Indians thousands of years ago?

      honestly i have no idea if they had primitive glider-type planes: the surviving sanskrit texts don't describe such.

      Indians a thousand years ago having modern or even futuristic technology that was lost without a trace save for writing in one book (which might be open to interpretation) is *NOT* extraordinary proof.

      i didn't say "proof", i effectively said "*after* reading the sanskrit documents (or their available translations), make a judgement for yourself". about what you've written: think about this - how, in a country where there is no internet, no telephones, no long-distance communication of *any* kind, would there be any kind of "backup" record? we're lucky that even the vimanas documents survived.

      cast your mind back thousands of years. most people you know - most people you've *ever* known - are subsistence farmers. the stories you hear - which became legend - are of the "gods" battling in flying chariots. pretty incredible, huh? and yet there are people who come back from battles who tell you these amazing tales... ... how many of those people would have writing skills? or know about electricity? (or even care)

      now compare that situation to today. do you know about electricity? do you know about something called "chemistry"? of course you do, and you have something called "the internet" where you could even teach yourself about those things. ... but the people in power at the time? they would have had extraordinary wealth, and extraordinary power. they would have had scholars, and engineers and much more - and the important thing is that in order to keep the knowledge they learned from falling into the hands of their enemies, they would have kept that knowledge *secret*, wouldn't they? and that would be easy to do: have a bunch of guys with great memories whom you keep an eye on (you can always kill them if you get attacked, whereas books could be stolen).

      so it is not too hard to imagine that:

      a) there could be secretive development of scientific knowledge
      b) that knowledge could be kept from everyone outside of the immediate power base
      c) that it would be so unbelievably far advanced from the rest of the society that they would consider it to be "magic", and the people controlling it to be "gods".

      does that make any sense? and is there anything unreasonable or irrational about either a, b or c, given what we know about the history of india around that era?

      now, regarding the "interpretation" comment: again, i can only say read the texts yourself. make the interpretation yourself". if you don't have time to do that, and are still interested, find someone that you trust who has.

      one thing i did find fascinating about that link i sent: the sanskrit texts apparently describe pilot clothing and diet! the clothing is designed to be fire-proof as well as extremely warm, and the recommended diet is five (!) meals a day. the texts also describe knowledge of different layers to our atmosphere (five are given names). the author of the analysis at the link i sent says that he had asked an airforce pilot to review the text, and he mentions that it is well-known amongst pilots - especially combat ones - that the physical toll of combat aircraft is extremely high. modern medical professionals therefore recommend that combat pilots eat small very frequent meals,. it is also a taboo in military airforce circles to fly on an empty stomach.

      question. how would they know this? a simple "glider" in no way puts its pilot through signifncant physical stress. gliders simply do not reach the required altitude. and how would they know that there are different regions to our atmosphere unless someone had actually been up there?

      *think* - please, for goodness sake.

    6. Re:original papers available translated to english by lkcl · · Score: 1

      there's a story on the internet that someone in india, during victorian times, actually recreated one of these machines, directly from the instructions. when the british heard about it they had it destroyed.

      And why hasn't anyone built any of these things since? Why doesn't any one build these now? If it were a matter of following instructions and someone did it on their own at one point a century or so ago, then it should be straightforward to crank out a prototype now.

      thinking that through, there could be a series of compounded reasons why not, and we can summarise at the end with an analogy.

      firstly, the people who _did_ make these flying machines were the ruling class of india at the time. they had reputations as "living gods" (how if they could quotes fly quotes would the ordinary person believe otherwise?). in other words, they were incredibly wealthy. so they had access to thousands or tens of thousands of workers if they needed them, to go out and find the metals and other resources.

      secondly, fast-forwarding to our "modern" times, we have some texts - written in the context of science at the time - which are in sanskrit, and the context is lost. it takes a *lot* of research to work out the missing information that the original authors would have known. the classic funny story here is that the bible was written in hebrew and was translated to greek by someone who didn't *actually* understand the idiomatic hebrew of the time. so he made some hilarious "literal" translations - the eye of the needle is the most well-known one but there are many others that two famous religious scholars collaborated together to uncover, on the basis that neither of them tried to convert the other away from their respective religions :)

      thirdly, we have the "cranks and myths and conspiracy" brigade who like to make a hell of a lot of noise, increasing the probability that even rational people will steer clear of the entire area, *especially* if they are in a quotes renowned quotes scientific established career.

      lastly, that analogy. imagine that we are talking about... say... fighter jets, not ancient flying vehicles. let's imagine that you've _heard_ about fighter jets (never seen one). you might have access to the internet, but you've never seen a "fighter jet" go over your head, making an enormous amount of noise. but you heard on the internet that they exist. in the context of a remote country, isolated from the rest of the world, ask yourself the question "why hasn't anyone in *our* country built one of these fighter jets?".

      and that really helps hammer it home, that these projects are *expensive*.... even if people believe they are practical (not a complete fabrication, at all, thanks to the cranks, in the first place). i went through the list of materials (the metallurgy section): there are *sixty* types of alloys that need to be made!

      so, yeah, i can fully understand why it hasn't been done in today's modern society.

    7. Re:original papers available translated to english by lkcl · · Score: 1

      Our lead emissions have left a trace in ice cores. As has our industrial production of CO2. We've got radar-trackable space junk in graveyard orbit that isn't going to go anywhere for millions of years. Our nuclear tests have left detectable traces of long-lived isotopes in ice cores too. If there had been any advanced industrial civilisation in the last hundred thousand years, we'd have found it.

      where on earth did you get the impression that india was an advanced industrial civilisation thousands of years ago? have you read any of the legends - the mahabarata and so on? it was *backwards*! only the people in power had the kinds of unlimited wealth similar to governments and large corporations of today. and - as now - they keep things incredibly secret. the advantage that they had then over today is the total lack of communication. the people in power at the time were so far removed in terms of wealth and knowledge and resources that they were commonly viewed - quite literally - as living gods.

      so no, there *was* no advanced industrial civilisation in india. there were a few incredibly wealthy powerful people with access to machines, scared of letting the knowledge out of their hands of how those machines worked in case their enemies got hold of them (a situation not dissimilar to today...) and then there was everyone else, eking out medieval-style subsistence existence.

    8. Re:original papers available translated to english by ultranova · · Score: 1

      it is absolute pure arrogance to think that our current level of technology is the first and only peak of technological capability on the planet: it's just that we are far more connected now than we were before, so word of new discoveries tends to get around.

      We are better connected because of technology. Any ancient society more advanced than us would also had been even better connected than our current global one.

      that "incredulity" you can counteract by simply reviewing the documents for yourself. i recommend focussing on the sections covering the science that *has* been re-discovered since the techniques were lost, for example the mining and metallurgy sections. once you have at least verified that these sections correspond precisely with modern techniques, is it so hard a stretch of one's mind to consider that the other sections and instructions might be correct as well?

      Not hard at all. Since you have "absolutely every single detail required", simply run the experiment.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    9. Re:original papers available translated to english by ultranova · · Score: 1

      c) that it would be so unbelievably far advanced from the rest of the society that they would consider it to be "magic", and the people controlling it to be "gods".

      does that make any sense? and is there anything unreasonable or irrational about either a, b or c, given what we know about the history of india around that era?

      Option c is completely irrational. The difference between magic and technology is that you don't need an economy to have a wizard throw lighning bolts from his fingers, but you do need one to use an assault rifle. And as the level of technology grows, so does the number of specialized jobs required to use it. A city-state surrounded by barbarians wouldn't have the population to keep their flying chariot in the air, not if it was actually a fighter yet.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    10. Re:original papers available translated to english by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You go on about how expensive and difficult and time consuming it is, yet took the time previous to point out the claim it was at one point done by a Victorian-era person, from a time period with fewer resources and knowledge, and being able to do so from the texts. The social structure when the document was written is irrelevant, the comparison to fighter jets is irrelevant if the document is as complete as you suggested, and the impact on a science career doesn't matter for the large number of ingenious people outside of science careers who sink a lot of time in to pursuing pseudoscience. Especially on that last point, things either don't work as claimed, or you really have to have low credibility to not be able to convince pseudo-scientists to spend years and thousands of dollars on such projects.

    11. Re:original papers available translated to english by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Having knowledge about something and having technology are two different things (though the latter usually does rely on the former). An ancient people (Indian or from somewhere else) might have known that lightning was bolts of electricity and not The Great God Of Lightning smiting nonbelievers. However, developing the tools to turn knowledge of electricity into electrical power - even for one building (say, the ruler's palace) - wouldn't have been achievable by them. Not without leaving major traces.

      As for how they learned about the layers of the atmosphere? Maybe some of them climbed a few tall mountains and noticed that the air near the top was different than the air at the bottom. Their "atmosphere layers" might not be the same as our atmosphere layers. You don't need to travel into space to figure out atmosphere layers.

      Finally, I am thinking. And I think that it is much more likely that stories of the gods battling in flying chariots originated to explain why thunder booms than it is that an ancient society had advanced-style (or even early 20th century style) aircraft. What would they make the aircraft out of? Where would be the industry to support developing these planes? Is there any historical evidence of this? And no, one written account doesn't equal proof. Like I said in my original post, if it did then some early 20th century sci-fi could prove that we had spaceships in the early 1900s.

      All that is happening here is that the text is being cherry-picked and interpreted in *just* the right way to "prove" that ancient Indians were actually plane-building-space-travelers with plastic surgery skills far beyond ours. And yet, this technology - and all evidence of it - vanished save for this one book. The level of technology that these claims say the ancient Indians had is extraordinary. As such, it'll take more than passages from a book to convince me that they had anywhere near it.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    12. Re:original papers available translated to english by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you don't know what it means or that it would be better worded, "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary quality of evidence," so as to not get confused with other variations on the meaning of "proof." The extraordinary nature of the claim means it runs against large mounts of evidence for well established theories, and some you would need rather substantial new evidence to counterweight that.

    13. Re:original papers available translated to english by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Advanced planes with the capability for space-flight to other planets? Sorry, but I'm not buying it. If you want to prove this, you'll need a lot more than "it's written down in some text somewhere."

      Some people don't claim that ancient Indians had any such things. Instead, they claim that ancient alien visitors had these things, and that ancient Indians regarded them as gods.

      Farfetched, absolutely. But much less so that some of the crazy stuff we westerners believe. Over here in the US, a bunch of us actually believe that some guy in upstate New York was shown the location of golden plates by an angel, and these plates had a missing testament describing how Jesus came to the New World and met with a bunch of mesoamerican tribes, for which zero archeological evidence exists. They also believe that God lives on a planet near the star Kolob, and that if you're good in this lifetime, you'll become the god of some other planet. There's a whole bunch of people in Clearwater, Florida who believe that all our mental problems are caused by the disembodied souls of aliens brought here 175M years ago by Xenu of the Galactic Confederation, who brought them here on space-going DC-10s and blew them up in a volcano on Hawaii.

      Compared to that stuff, the idea that aliens with advanced technology visited this planet a few thousand years ago is actually quite reasonable. I'm not saying it's true or that there's any veracity to it, but before we make fun of it, maybe we should look at the crazy shit we believe first.

  57. Re:Coming soon to another episode of Ancient Alien by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Since when was TIME an issue for ancient people? Humanity is at least 10,000 years old, and modern science is less than 400 years old. There's been time for an entire technological civilization to rise, fall, and be for all practical purposes erased (e.g. the Atlantis legend). I'm not saying that happened, but it's a perfectly viable plot for a sci-fi novel or TV show. The only real problem is that modern science also sits on a technological base in which glass, iron, etc. all exist, and as far as we can tell these took a long time to be discovered using the trial-and-error (non-scientific) method. So really it's not the advanced equipment you need to worry about, it's the mundane things like the ability to grind a lens from glass you made.

  58. Goodness Gracious Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Goodness Gracious Me was an Indian sketch show on UK telly we grew up with... they had a character we called 'Everything is Indian' man. Check che-che-che-check it out

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ln5QgeCL1fs

  59. Now that they are the joke of the week... by nospam007 · · Score: 2

    ...some bad India jokes:

      I'm Gonna Jump

      In Mumbai, a man is going to jump off the building.
    Up rushes good Hindu cop to talk him down.
    Cop yells up to the man "Don't jump! Think of your father" Man replies "Haven't got a father; I'm going to jump."
    The cop goes through a list of relatives, mother, brothers, sister, etc. Each time man says "haven't got one; going to jump."
    Desperate the cop yells up "Don't jump! Think of Lord Krishna"
    Man replies "Who is that?"
    Cop yells "Jump, Muslim! You're blocking traffic!"

      Two Accountants

    One day two accountants, who were best friends, were walking together down the street.
    One was a Hindu and constantly berated the other for eating meat!
    After stopping for a hot dog, the Hindu erupted "Why do you eat meat?, Do you even know what's in that hot dog? You know, you are what you eat!"
    The American replied "I am what I eat, an uncontrollable vicious animal (beating his chest)"
    As they stepped off the curb a speeding car came around the corner and ran the Hindu over.
    The American called 911 and helped his injured friend as best he was able.
    The injured Hindu was taken to emergency at the hospital and rushed into surgery. After a long and agonizing wait, the doctor finally appeared.
    He told the uninjured American, "I have good news, and I have bad news. The good news is that your friend is going to pull through."
    "The bad news is that he's going to be a vegetable for the rest of his life."

      Currency Exchange
    A hindu man walked into the currency exchange in New York City with 5000 rupees and walked out with $100.
    The following week, he walked in with another 5000 rupees, and was handed $84.
    He asked the teller why he got less money that week than the previous week. The teller said, "Fluctuations."
    The hindu man stormed out, and just before slamming the door, turned around and shouted, "Fluc you Amelicans, too!"

  60. Re:Coming soon to another episode of Ancient Alien by meta-monkey · · Score: 2

    They had to discontinue use of the mobile version, though. Turns out signal fires kept in the pocket or held to one's ear emit harmful radiation.

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  61. I'm sure they had planes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see no reason that ancient Indians had planes, or lines, or angles.

  62. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OP mentions several ways in which his putative civilization did leave traces. The burden of proof lies with whoever wants to make a categorical statement of fact, and you're a lot closer to that than OP is. OP is just wondering out loud.

    "X would probably do Y" isn't a remotely scientific argument, by the way.

  63. Goodness gracious me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ln5QgeCL1fs

    'nuff said

  64. Babylonians had a proof of the Pythagorean Theorem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As did the ancient Chinese...if you see a square set within another square, creating an inner square and four congruent right triangles, in a mathematical treatise, it is extremely likely that you are looking at a relatively simple proof of the Pythagorean Theorem. This is especially true if you see the computation of the square root of 2 accurate to six decimal places in the cuneiform base-60 number system beside the figure, as depicted on clay tablets.

  65. Let the other party be listened to as well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Indeed, a lot of weird things exist in India.

    - Regions with really high radioactive background but with no compelling natural explanation. Ruins of ancient castles where the stone walls have thoroughly melted as if glass, at temperatures most likely higher than termite or oxy-acetylene

    - Rather detailed descriptions of tactical nuclear warfare in the vedas, including fallout and decontamination activity.

    - Descriptions of giant arrow throwers, which protect aginst vimanas or flying war chariots, but are so complex no less than 4 people in close cooperation can operate them.
    (Those passages bear eerie similarity to the SA-2 missiles that downed B-52s over Hanoi: they were so complex at least 4-5 people were needed to guide them. This was NOT because of the low level of automation-computerization available to the soviets, as it has been proven over and over that higher automated systems, e.g. BUK, TOR can be jammed deterministically by advanced enough pods. In contrast, man in the loop systems, like the SA-3 remain efficient after over 40 years in service and earthed an F-16, F-117 in 1999 and a jewish AGM-142 flying bomb a few weeks ago.)

    - There is a long-running rumor among the jews (the gem trading race) that those fabulous giant diamonds found nowhere else but India are artificial, rather than of natural origin. Many millenia ago, there was some advanced civilization in the Indus valley, who could make fist sized diamonds. We are decades, if not centuries from that level of sophistication.

    - Hinduism is the only major religion that never felt the need to exterminate the faith of her neighbours or the neighbours themselves. India is spiritually more advanced, maybe because they have already have their many major wars many millenia ago, thus having learnt what we learned only in WWI and WW2. (May I mention stories about the legendary King Ashoka and the secret anti-war society of the Nine Unknown Men, he founded?)

    - If you watch the recent prequel of Alien movie, the extraterrestrial "engineer" is seen reading ancient sanskrit there (tale of the horse and lamb or something like that). I think there is a deep-running understanding in the graeco-roman heritage that white people culture and the large majority of european languages can from northern India, the so-called aryans.

    1. Re:Let the other party be listened to as well. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Why is that modded funny?
      It should be +5 informative or even insightfull.

      Unfortunately it is true that unlike the Bible the old Veda scripts indeed read like a very good sciense fiction story with references to nukes, planes, bombardments and missiles.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:Let the other party be listened to as well. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Even by the standards of Slashdot's ACs, that is some high-grade bullshit. n wonder you haven't got the balls to put your name to a post like that.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  66. AMERICA.... FUCK YEAH ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Airplanes and Television invented by Americans.

  67. Re:Coming soon to another episode of Ancient Alien by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Smoke signals. The bps rate was terrible tho.

  68. Give it a rest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Due to European colonization and prior Mongol/Turkic conquests a lot of Indians have an inferiority complex. By making outrageous claims politicians can make gullible people feel good about themselves, their culture and their glorious 'technologically advanced' past. By doing so they divert attention from real issues.

  69. One inaccuracy stands out.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The claim:

    "Mr. Harsh Vardhan who was present at the conference claimed that ancient Indian mathematicians discovered the Pythagorean theorem"

    Actually the Mayans demonstrated usage of trigonometric principles before the Greeks, but since they are not still around to defend themselves.. We have Mr Vardhan's claim and Pythagorus.

  70. Re:...and... Egypt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It also happens in Egypt.

    The guide told us that the Pyramids were built by Arabs and this shows superiority of Muslims.

  71. You have never experienced Shakespeare by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 4, Funny

    Until you have read him in the original Hindi.

    1. Re:You have never experienced Shakespeare by Adeptus_Luminati · · Score: 1

      I think you mean Sanskrit. Have you heard Hindi these days? Having never studied it I already understand 20% of it, because 20% of it already is English. Don't believe me? Turn on the Hindi channel on your TV. Hindi is one of the most bastardized languages that I know of.

      --
      No trees were killed in the making of this post; however, many trillions of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.
    2. Re:You have never experienced Shakespeare by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      Hindi is one of the most bastardized languages that I know of.

      After English. :)

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    3. Re:You have never experienced Shakespeare by BobandMax · · Score: 1

      Ah, but that's how English works. Other languages have pretensions of purity. (see French)

      --

      "Computers are useless. They can only give you answers."
      -- Pablo Picasso
  72. A long-standing problem in subcontinent history. by goodmanj · · Score: 1

    This is really a historian problem, not a science problem. India and Pakistan have a long and difficult backstory with regard to nationalist historiography: following the overthrow of the British empire, they quite understandably had a bit of anti-Western sentiment and a re-appreciation of indigenous history and culture. Unfortunately this translated into some pretty jingoistic "we created everything" hypernationalism, which was most prominent in the '60s and '70s, but continues today.

    Case in point: I once wrote an essay in college on the science and math knowledge of the Indus Valley civilization circa 1800 BC. One of my sources claimed that these folks invented everything from relativity to calculus to quantum mechanics, but the best bit was an archaeologist who measured the ruins of a circular well, noticed that the ratio of its circumference to its diameter was about 3.1, and argued that this meant the Indus River folks knew the value of pi.

  73. Not new. See: Louis Farrakhan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Louis Farrakhan has been making such claims for DECADES, only in his case he claims all these things were once the product of blacks in Africa (show he calls "sun people") and that the "Ice People" (one of his nicer labels for whites) destroyed all the evidence when they colonized the continent (He has never been able to explain how those primitive white "ice people" in their wooden sailing ships concquered the high-tech, jet plane flying "sun people" of Africa)

    This seems to be a tactic of rabble rousers trying to build the self esteem of communities that have been backward for centuries due to tribalism, rejection of western education, rejection of free markets, etc (Farrakhan, for example, is NOT appealing to average black Americans but rather to his insular Black pseudo-Muslim cultists)

  74. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously because Nazis used their superior Nazi Science to travel back in time to ancient India with a V2. They even taught the locals superior Nazi Ideals like a racist caste system and mathematics. Ganesh's trunk is an obvious allegory for Hitler's thin mustache. Is there any other reason "bitte machen das enfordern" would be a common phrase in both German and Hindi?

  75. Hire Indian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember folks, with 18% of the world's population, 18% of the world's best developers, scientists and business leaders are in India!

  76. Re:Coming soon to another episode of Ancient Alien by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

    Ancient peoples were just as smart as us

    Not necessarily, considering their poor nutrition.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank
  77. Re: Coming soon to another episode of Ancient Alie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    10 000? Try 200 000.

  78. Sure, sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's just stipulate that Indians invented and discovered everything and were cheated of their deserved recognition by vile revisionists. Then, move on.

  79. I Guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess the History Channel has finally arrived in India, and Anciente Aliens is the #1 show.

  80. "structured water". by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Russian science has had this periodic fad of climaing extraordinary qualities of water like under certain conditions it becomes more healing, or retains a memory of enviroment it once previously was in. I saw this in the two "New Age" documentaries called "What The Bleep?" Part of this goes back to trying to prove the claim that blessed water in Russian Christianity has altered the physical properties of water into somethime more useful which science can detect. Part of this that even in accepted Western science water is fiendishly complicated with at least nine frozen phases, unusual hydrogen bond behavior, extreme solvency, and the like.

    1. Re:"structured water". by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      climaing extraordinary qualities of water like under certain conditions it becomes more healing, or retains a memory of environment it once previously was in

      You're talking about homeopathy, which was dreamt up by a German crackpot a couple of centuries ago. Sadly if you go to your local health food store, you will find the shelves full of bottled water labeled as homeopathic remedies.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    2. Re:"structured water". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he was probably talking about Polywater which became a big thing in USSR for a while, before literally becoming a textbook example of pathological science. Later on there is some overlap between polywater and homeopathy, but for the most part it was its own thing, making big headway into mainstream science in the 60s before people figured out what mistakes were being made.

  81. Wait a second, this sounds familiar... by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    Were the planes DC-8s, by any chance?

  82. Egypt had helicopters, submarines and spaceships by kbahey · · Score: 1

    As an Egyptian, I have to take issue with India claiming they were flying first. The Egyptians indeed had helicopters, submarines and spaceships thousands of years ago. And not in oral myth. We have real carvings on the temple of Abydos showing them clearly.

    Don't believe me? See for yourself.

    For the sarcastically challenged, they indeed look today live those vehicles, but the cause is recarving the new pharoah's name on top of the old one, hence this artifact.

    Mod this informative, not funny!

  83. Re:Coming soon to another episode of Ancient Alien by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

    Ancient peoples were just as smart as us

    This is highly debatable. Much of our "smarts" amounts to education, research, modern tools, and discoveries made over thousands of years. Standing on the shoulders of giants and all that. Even if you argue by smart you mean intelligence and thinking skills, you still have to consider nutrition and health both of which can have a huge impact on adult intelligence levels.

  84. Voting matters? by Chromium_One · · Score: 1

    You know, we really need to get rid of this first-past-the-post system for selecting representatives. At this point about all it's doing is insuring that we only ever see two viable candidates for far too many positions and people wind up holding their noses while voting for the least objectionable candidate... just voting 'someone else' tends to not be very effective. Consider the banking collapse in Iceland and how a bunch of jokers wound up winning elections there... and then wound up coming up with some viable (at least in the short term) solutions for the problems. Now consider how the holy fuck things would have to go sideways in the US for anything even remotely resembling that to happen above the city or county level. Seriously, NOBODY seems to want to take the risk that the Other Party Who Is At Least Marginally More Objectionable will win, so they refuse to vote for a candidate that might actually properly represent them and instead just vote for the slightly less objectionable candidate who seems to stand a chance. Yeah ... not viable to keep this up in the long term.

    --
    When you live in a sick society, just about everything you do is wrong.
  85. Re:Coming soon to another episode of Ancient Alien by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the ancient planes also had the ability to fly between planets too. Don't think that these claims will stand up to review.

    Ancient peoples were just as smart as us, but you need time to build the necessary tech. base in order to make advanced equipment so that you can discover advanced scientific theories and engineering disciplines.

    I believe that Church of Scientology will corroborate these findings.

  86. facts sets you free! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there is a new research of Vedic Science based on numerical axiom from 68 sutras which beyond all doubt establish what knowledge ancient civilization acquired in pre glacial era goes back to 33000 years with precision and consistency. New research has unite all spectrum of hidden/detectable domain of dynamic space comprise of elemental particles where space critical density 3.63115 E-25 kg/cum beyond whic detection is not possible due to merged vibrations as well as smallest interval 1.344E-51 . There is a perpetual rate of 2.96E+8 and observe don earth as 2.99E+8 m/s due to ratio of sun's radius to earth's orbital radius as 1.0108.....All prtical mass proton neutron etc derived from within the axiomatic domain is surprise among many new findings !one is in all humility request all scholar to explore & investigate facts provided in research based on axiomatic foundation is perhaps help open the door for new possibilities .Research can be freely explored at kapillavastu dot com

  87. Al Gore Protests India's Internet Invention Claim by FrodoOfTheShire · · Score: 1

    India claims their invention of messengers is a precursor to the modern internet, thus they invented it. Indignant Al Gore re-asserts his claim to inventing the internet.

  88. A Truly Modest Admission... by Baldrson · · Score: 1

    He forgot to mention, probably out of modesty, that the transistor, integrated circuit and the Internet were all invented in Bhrat Gaarjya as well.

  89. The Russians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    did it all first.

  90. Re:Egypt had helicopters, submarines and spaceship by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

    Thanks, was really interesting to see how fantastical-seeming (and authentic-seeming) findings can give way to rather more mundane explanations.

    --
    ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
  91. "facts" indeed by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 2

    That's a nice word salad you have there.

    --
    ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
  92. Ancient India DID Discover the Pythagorean Theorem by careysub · · Score: 1

    Seriously - this is not in dispute in any way. A statement of the theorem and proofs appear in both the Baudhayana Sulba Sutra and the Apastamba Sulba Sutra, and this has been known in the West for a couple of centuries at least.

    Whether Indians discovered it before Pythagoras is a different question, and the answer seems to be "most likely". The dating of the authorship of the aforementioned sutras is uncertain - the latest dates offered are after Pythagoras, but earlier dates (which seem stronger) push it one to three centuries before Pythagoras.

    I am surprised to see this being held up to ridicule here.

    --
    Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
  93. Justin Wilson by Dareth · · Score: 1

    Boy, cornbread are square, pi(e) are round!

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
    1. Re:Justin Wilson by dltaylor · · Score: 1

      Just repeating a VERY old joke. I first heard it back in the late 1950s.

  94. Modern Cavemen by Dareth · · Score: 1

    Cavemen were the first to have a wireless society. And even more, I hear they liked to go clubbing too.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  95. Pythagorean Theorem by dcollins · · Score: 2

    The thing about the Pythagorean Theorem is completely true and well-documented (by maybe one or two hundred years). Pretty sure it's in a sidebar to the college algebra text I teach out of.

    Wikipedia: "In India, the Baudhayana Sulba Sutra, the dates of which are given variously as between the 8th century BC and the 2nd century BC, contains a list of Pythagorean triples discovered algebraically, a statement of the Pythagorean theorem, and a geometrical proof of the Pythagorean theorem for an isosceles right triangle. The Apastamba Sulba Sutra (ca. 600 BC) contains a numerical proof of the general Pythagorean theorem, using an area computation. Van der Waerden believed that "it was certainly based on earlier traditions". Boyer (1991) thinks the elements found in the ulba-stram may be of Mesopotamian derivation.[67]... Pythagoras, whose dates are commonly given as 569–475 BC, used algebraic methods to construct Pythagorean triples..."

    [67] Carl Benjamin Boyer (1968). "China and India". A history of mathematics. Wiley. p. 229.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagorean_theorem#History

    There's all kinds of examples, maybe more often the case than not, that mathematical principles get named after someone other than the original discoverer. It doesn't even require "forgotten knowledge" or anything like that, just some kind of power relationship at play. In fact, Stigler's Law of Eponomy (named after Stephen Stigler, Distinguished Service Professor at the Department of Statistics of the University of Chicago) states, "No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." See also: Matthew Effect and Boyer's Law.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stigler%27s_law_of_eponymy

    Here's professor Richard Lipton writing on that particular subject:

    http://rjlipton.wordpress.com/2011/04/08/why-is-everything-named-after-gauss/ ... but obviously the other stuff mentioned at the conference is total looney-tunes.

    --
    We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    1. Re:Pythagorean Theorem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except the oldest know Hindu texts are COPIES dating no earlier than 800AD. So we do get to question whether the copies are accurate reproductions.

  96. Re:...and... you're a fucking moron who is driven by smarkham01 · · Score: 1

    Are you saying an ideologically driven, chaste moron is somehow prevented from blindly following one side or the other?

  97. listen/read skeptically by dltaylor · · Score: 2

    It's a very long distance from fanciful imagery in ancient texts (Ezekiel's wheel is a UFO, obviously, for example) to the historical existence of a nuclear war.

    Explanations for natural and/or artifical oddities have to be seriously sought before giving credence to theories developed by those looking to use seeming correlations to bolster possible fantasies. How many times has Nostradamus been proved "correct"? It is a human trait to look for correlations; if the first three times your tribe passed a rock outcropping it was attacked by a lion, maybe those who noticed the pattern survived to pass down the trait of observation. There is, to my knowlege, never been a seriously funded and staffed attempt to look for rational explanations for fear of offending the believers.

    We make artificial diamonds now; it's just not cost-effective compared to low-wage workers digging and dying in Africa.

    When's the last time Buddhists staged a jihad?

  98. When you think about it... by matbury · · Score: 2

    ...everyone's Indian really. Here's some examples from British sitcom, Goodness Gracious Me!: https://www.youtube.com/playli...

  99. and all western science is based on..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ancient indian bagavad ghita. There are claims that calculus was invented thousands of years ago by indians and when europeans started taking the ancient texts back to europe Libnitz and Newton among others decoded the texts and put the material in a more rigorous format. and "invented" calculus. Claims like these are ridiculous. Just like christians claiming the bible knew that the earth was round.

    1. Re:and all western science is based on..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did know the earth was round long before the biblical era. The Greeks even calculated its circumference surprisingly accurately.

      Do you really believe the fairy tale that up until Columbus, people thought they'd fall off the horizon? For that to be true, nobody in history until that point could have ever traveled more than 1 or 2 miles in their entire life, else they'd notice the horizon moves too.

  100. Yes, but evidence is required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    back it up. The only thing I know (heard and believe) about India is that they were the first to come up with plastic surgery. Specifically, reattaching things that are severed. The tale I was told is that India law led many a convict to pay the penalty of having something chopped off... but then they could go to the doc and have it sewn back on. Evidence is observable from very old bodies/remains.

    Where is the radioactive glass temple? Or any evidence of growing diamonds? Suspected ancient India-grown diamonds could be analyzed to see if the match the chemical signatures of dug up diamonds or synthetic.

  101. Still Indian? by nicoleb_x · · Score: 1

    I not sure, but I think my relatives from 7,000 years ago wouldn't be invited to dinner (if they could somehow be alive), just what would we have in common? If you're going to brag about your ancestors you should probably at least have met them.

    1. Re:Still Indian? by MikeSynnott · · Score: 1

      >> "just what would we have in common" ... ... Your command of English?

  102. Re:Coming soon to another episode of Ancient Alien by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Thousands of years? Modern technology is only a few hundred years old. All the Roman-era tech was lost after the fall of Rome, and western society didn't develop any real technology again until the Renaissance, and later the Industrial Revolution. We went from swords to landing on the Moon in less than 500 years.

  103. A fine example of the nonsense by g8oz · · Score: 1

    This is a great example of the self serving nationalist nonsense that has so much currency in India.

    Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Not generous misreading of religious texts.

    Re: Aliens - the indulgence by Hollywood of pet Aryan origin theories is not proof of anything. I can't believe I have to say that.

    P.S " jews (the gem trading race) "....that is a priceless phrase.

  104. This is why we NEED the Singularity by SentinelWolf627 · · Score: 1

    "Gort, Kla'atu verada nikto!"

  105. Hindu nationalist bullshit by Shadowolf7 · · Score: 1

    And this is yet another reason why I left Hinduism for Buddhism. The Indiots have failed to understand the sages so thoroughly that they have to resort to corrupting science like the Abrahamic religions.

  106. Lord Ganesh has a smartphone? by doccus · · Score: 1

    Betcha he's turned the speaker volume waay down..

  107. No, I said AVOID the colourful mushrooms, man! by MikeSynnott · · Score: 1

    "These startling claims come just a few days after prime minister Narendra Modi had called Lord Ganesha who is part elephant and part human, a product of ancient India's knowledge of plastic surgery." ... ... Christ! Is it any wonder many Asian countries have the death penalty for smuggling drugs in?!

  108. Re:Actually... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Nuclear war that destroyed a civilization would probably leave some kind of trace, as would a civilization that advanced.

    It would, but surely it could be long-buried. If this civilization is truly ancient, for instance more than 10k years old, and was destroyed that long ago, that's a long time for ruins to be covered up by natural and geological processes. We're still finding whole cities in the rain forest of Central America now which were previously thought to be legendary or were simply unknown, and that's from a civilization that only died out about 1500 years ago. As for timelines to develop technology, remember only 500 years ago we westerners were all living in wooden huts and burning each other at the stake for heresy; the Industrial Revolution only started less than 200 years ago. It's conceivable (though highly unlikely, thanks to the lack of physical evidence so far) that another technological civilization rose up > 10k years ago, but destroyed itself in nuclear warfare. 10k years is probably enough time for radioactive contamination to peter out to background levels and not be easily detectable, I should think. And who knows, maybe the timeline of these ancient writings is wrong: what if this stuff actually happened 20k or 30k years ago? Not much evidence would be left over from that long ago, unless you can manage to find a vimana in a deep cave somewhere.

    Now again, I'm not saying any of this is likely, only that it might be possible.

    The main problem I do have with all of this, however, is the lack of evidence. While that much time is a long time for things to be buried or weathered away, it seems like some of it should have survived somewhere. And if a civilization back then were as advanced as, say, our civilization circa 1945, it likely wouldn't have confined itself to the Indian subcontinent, it surely would have expanded far beyond that place, and pieces of its technology taken all over the planet.

  109. Re:Actually... by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

    Nuclear warfare and a society with that kind of tech would leave behind much more than civilization we've found so far, and India is the second most populous country in the world by a rather large margin, which would make it harder to hide something there than the Amazon. Also, in order for them to develop the kind of technology to have a nuclear state, they would need to have had advanced farming, and would have had to have had a bigger population than the rest of the world combined at that time to have the manpower to have developed such things. Occam's razor is screaming that this is just a bullshit theory that's been made up.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  110. Re:Actually... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Nuclear warfare and a society with that kind of tech would leave behind much more than civilization we've found so far

    That's what I'm thinking, but also remember, 10k years (or better yet, 20k or 30k) is a really long time; natural processes quickly erase signs of civilization.

    and India is the second most populous country in the world by a rather large margin, which would make it harder to hide something there than the Amazon.

    Not necessarily: if all the evidence is buried, it could still be there. India may be populated, but it's never (in the last thousand years at least) been a major center of economic activity or a world power, and has been a bit of a backwater. Here in industrialized western nations (US and EU), we regularly find stuff (especially in the EU) when we're building stuff and accidentally dig up something old. We just recently discovered the skeleton of Richard III in England for example. Many other important archeological discoveries have been made when, for instance, digging the foundation for a large building. India has only recently gotten a decent degree of industrialization; perhaps there's all kinds of things underground waiting to be discovered. Plus, in Europe the oldest technological stuff will only be 2k years old or so, except maybe for stone tools made by Neanderthals and the like. If there's 20k-year-old stuff in India, it might not be discovered until people do really deep digging for things.

    Also, in order for them to develop the kind of technology to have a nuclear state, they would need to have had advanced farming, and would have had to have had a bigger population than the rest of the world combined at that time to have the manpower to have developed such things.

    Probably true. The other problem I have is that not only should there have been artifacts in India, but elsewhere too, as such a civilization surely would have sent people and technological items around the world. They wouldn't have just flown their vimana around India and stayed away from everywhere else. But there's no evidence for any such technology, even though we have, for instance, found ancient stone tools from humans from before those times, and have found very ancient human bodies trapped in bogs.

  111. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what I'm thinking, but also remember, 10k years (or better yet, 20k or 30k) is a really long time; natural processes quickly erase signs of civilization

    There is a difference between a few large cities, and a large industrial civilization in terms of their impact, with the latter having a lot of global impacts that much harder to erase than a specific site. The example of nuclear warfare would leave deposits of material all over the world, some still radioactive after 10s of thousands of years, others messing with isotope ratios. In particular, isotope ratios are studied for a variety of dating methods, not just carbon dating, and are important indicators how plant life was doing, volcanic eruptions, and meteorite impacts, which can all involve very small changes. Tree ring, ice core, and sediment core records of the atmosphere go back a couple tens of thousands of years too.

  112. Re:Actually... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    How about this thought experiment? Forget the Indians for a moment, because you're right, a nuclear war probably should have left more evidence than that (any nuclear experts around?).

    We know that humans have been around for about 2 million years. We also know that humans can go from very primitive technology to nuclear weapons and airplanes in only 1000 years (imagine where we'd be now if the Roman Empire hadn't collapsed and all that technological progress lost, with 1000 years between then and the Enlightenment).

    Is it possible humans, somewhere, at some very distant time in the past (perhaps 1 million years ago), developed an advanced civilization and then destroyed themselves with nukes? Is 1M years sufficiently distant that several nuclear (or just atomic) detonations would be undetectable now, and for all other traces of that civilization to be gone?

    Just how far back do we have to go before a civilization is completely undetectable to us with our present technology and amount of digging we've done? How about non-humans? Would it have been possible for some race to have evolved and created such a civilization 100M or even 1 billion years ago? IIRC, Arthur C Clarke's book "Light of Other Days" actually has this as a plot point at the end.

  113. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ice core samples of the atmosphere go back currently about 800k years, with plans/efforts to push that back to about 1.5M years ago. A change on a similar timescale and amount as 1800-1900, maybe even 1800-1850 would be visible (so potentially the effects of something like the industrial revolution, before it reached a global spread). Nuclear testing also leaves a trace of Cl-36 in ice cores, which increased by almost three orders of magnitude in ice cores by the early 1960s from atmospheric testing. It does have a half-life of 300k years, but even after a million years, even considerably smaller atmospheric testing than done by the US and Russia would still produce a large change. Some of these things go further back in ocean sediment, although a bit noisier. U235-U238 ratios also can indicate if uranium was present in a nuclear reactor or enriched, and some evidence of a natural reactor can go back billions of years, and uranium from our use in testing and accidents gets spread around the globe in dust (although mixed with natural uranium as a result too).

  114. What next? by NewYork · · Score: 1

    Indian Science Congress will claim that it found cure to cancer thousands of years back

  115. Sheep herd mentality. by NewYork · · Score: 1

    India follows the "Sheep Herd" mentality.
    The whole country's economy is based on people getting into "Profitable" domains mostly following the success of a pioneer in the field.
    The most recent example of this ideology is the "Business Process Outsourcing" industry and Mars Exploration.
    New BPO units are propping up here and there at a dime a dozen leading to a quality deterioration in the final deliverable.
    This process will continue till a saturation level is reached and then they will wait till another "Killer" domain picks up momentum.
    Till then India will be in a so called "Calm Period" where nothing great and major takes place.

  116. Indians invented Rape by NewYork · · Score: 1
  117. Indians invented Racism by NewYork · · Score: 1
  118. Indians invented Shoplifting by NewYork · · Score: 1
  119. Indians invented Corruption by NewYork · · Score: 1
  120. Indians invented Slavery by NewYork · · Score: 1
  121. INDIA Invented First Aeroplane Must Watch.By Rajiv by Rajaram99 · · Score: 1