Slashdot Mirror


The Downside of Connected Healthcare: Cyberchondria

MollsEisley writes: Like hypochondria, cyberchondria is simply a more elegant way of saying "it's all in your head" — only in this case the people self-diagnosing are using tenuous data gleaned from the Internet and our ever-connected gadgets to support their hypotheses. Virtually everyone who has put the Microsoft Band through its paces has come away with the claim that its heart rate monitor is simply bad. ... The Moto 360’s heart rate monitor doesn’t fare much better, and in only the most perfect, motionless conditions will it provide anything close to an accurate reading. These are horribly inaccurate health tools, yet they are used as bullet points for would-be buyers to cling to. ... Even WebMD—the service that has given so many cyberchondriacs the fuel to continue guessing—has a note on every single one of its countless pages that states the site “does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.” And yet, that’s the one and only thing most people use WebMD for.

79 comments

  1. In recent study... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A recent medical study showed that frequent masturbation can actually reduce a man's chances of developing prostate cancer, as well as numerous other illnesses.

    After doing a self diagnosis I've discovered I'm going to live forever.

    1. Re: In recent study... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Switching to Geico could save you 15% or more on car insurance. Make hard working Geico customers pay for that Toyota you claimed was totaled.

    2. Re: In recent study... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice meme :^)

    3. Re: In recent study... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You still pay for Obamacare. It's just like any other health insurance.

    4. Re: In recent study... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no that is the old system where the ER covers all and for the stuff they don't do the Jail / prison takes up the slack.

  2. The downside of having too much time in hands by ruir · · Score: 1

    making up new words, and doing studies for what we take for granted.

    1. Re:The downside of having too much time in hands by jonnythan · · Score: 2

      No, it really is kind of a big deal. WebMD is for-profit and largely funded by advertisers such as pharmaceutical companies. The site uses clickbait-style headlines to drive page views and actively preys on fear.

      http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02...
      http://www.washingtontimes.com...

  3. Self-diagnosis by ciascu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Surely hyperchondria will always find a way, the internet just makes it more efficient? In fairness to WebMD, what something is intended for and what people choose to use it for can be very different - I'd say, up to a reasonable point, if WebMD is fulfilling its primary purpose for which it was created, people need to take responsibility for the risks they take in depending on it while ignoring the advice to defer to a clinician, whether there's five of them or five hundred thousand. If they can't understand that responsibility, the problem is with the education system, not the internet.

    Somebody recently pointed out that if you Google "chest pain" you could end up thinking it was harmless and you should just ignore it. They evidently hadn't tried Googling it. I continue to see ads on the TV saying, "please use your common sense if you have cold or flu symptoms to decide whether you have a serious risk, as going to your GP or A&E blocks services for others", and not "if you think you have a brain tumour, stay at home", so it seems internet self-diagnosis may not even be the primary issue. At what percentage do the few serious cases, who wouldn't have otherwise bothered going to a doctor, outweigh the number of Cyberchondriacs enabled by the same process?

    1. Re:Self-diagnosis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You didn't mention the actual condition (apart from the joint hypermobility syndrome) but the fact that you said it is genetic defect affecting collagen makes me think the condition is Ehlers Danlos Syndrome.

      As someone who has been in a similar situation for all of my 26 years of life, and also managed to self diagnose after a lot of research, I can completely understand this. I too did not know that it wasn't normal to be in chronic pain all the time until a few years ago... the search for a reason began. It wasn't until my own research led me to joint hypermobility syndrome, and then onto Ehlers Danlos, that anyone even bothered to pay attention. Almost all of my joints bend backwards, my skin is super stretchy and I have many other related symptoms (that in and of themselves do not seem to point to something larger... until you connect the dots)

      I have sat in countless Drs offices and explained my symptoms, and been told it was all normal. It wasn't until about a year ago that I actually told a GP to google Ehlers Danlos and check off my symptoms against the lists described on various websites. Sure enough... he sent me to a specialist straight away, and, just like your wife, it turns out there actually was something wrong.... Ehlers Danlos Syndrome.

      Since then I have started exploring treatment options, some of which are helpful, others not so much. I also will probably be in the situation where I have to apply for disability while I try to stabilise my condition and get myself back on my feet and figure out my long term plan, but like your wife, atleast now I know what to do and what not to do.

      It is reassuring to know I am not the only one in this situation, and I am glad to hear of the positive outcome you have had when dealing with such horrible problems. I feel for your wife and the pain and suffering she has endured over the years but I am filled with hope that she is now coping with her condition and leading a much better life.

      Thank you for your post. After a day filled with specialist appointments (a few of which I had to explain my condition to) it is good to know that there is light at the end of the tunnel, and that you, like me, found self diagnosis to be useful in what is a very rare and obscure condition (that many Drs have not even heard of).

      All the best and thank you to you both, from another 'bendy' individual

    2. Re:Self-diagnosis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry just realised you said ex-wife*

    3. Re:Self-diagnosis by chooks · · Score: 1

      Hmmm...we covered Ehler-Danlos and collagen synthesis disorders the first year of med school (might have even been in the first couple of months).

      Glad to hear you finally got a diagnosis.

      --
      -- The Genesis project? What's that?
    4. Re:Self-diagnosis by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You make an important point about not realizing that symptoms are abnormal and thus are actually symptoms of something.

      I suffered from arthritis all my life, but wasn't diagnosed until my late 20s. It explained a lot, and was a huge weight off. Before then I just assumed it hurt everyone to do certain things, but they just kept quiet about it like I did. Aching was normal when sitting still for five minutes, right? Sounds stupid now but when you don't know any better...

      I feel like there should be some way that doctors can diagnose this kind of thing. No-one even tries though. No-one bothers to ask people who are not complaining about how they feel to see if any of it is abnormal.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Self-diagnosis by ledow · · Score: 1

      Awareness of all the related conditions is growing. I work in schools and I've spoken to several school nurses who have each said "Oh, yes, I've got a couple of kids on my books with that condition, I know what that is".

      My wife's cousin (much younger than her) has also been diagnosed with EDS since and there are several "traits" of her mother and father that - now we're looking for them - look like she may have just been a bad combination of both their genes (both having pseudo-JHS/EDS conditions in their families of varying degrees of severity).

      She moved to a warmer climate, it improved. She got onto proper medication, it improved. She learned that it's not normal and stopped suffering it and got more careful, it improved. She still has bad days and, having been to residential weekends for sufferers of the various related conditions, she's nowhere near the worst sufferer from it any more.

      There's a story she likes to spread about one of her friends from one of the online support groups - her friend has much more serious, but quite variable, EDS and is eligible for a disabled parking badge. The friend parked at a supermarket in a disabled space, stumbled out of the car, and went to walk inside. An old woman passed and shouted "You don't look disabled!". The reply she got was "You don't look stupid, but appearances can be deceptive, can't they!".

      It can be that manageable, although it never quite goes away, that others won't realise you have it.

      Arthritis-specialists in the UK have leaflets available for the conditions, now, because it's so often mis-diagnosed under their specialism.

      My ex-wife and I have a daughter together, and she shows no symptoms. I think when you "mix" the genes with someone who's not got family histories of the conditions (which are often so minor they go unnoticed into the background of being "flexible" or "a dancer" or "a gymnast" or whatever), it doesn't necessarily travel down every time.

      But I think that we'll see increasing cases of this as the gene pools expand and mix, but hopefully resulting only in flexible people with watered-down versions of the condition, and not people in pain. And, for woman, being flexible of the bodily tissues is at least one bonus when it comes to childbirth!

    6. Re:Self-diagnosis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife has a similar condition, although not as severe, but combined with several others. A majority of doctors, up to recent years, have never helped her, or her conditions. She ended up getting a lucky break with a good visit, and once she had a seed of knowledge build from, proceeded to get herself educated. She now often brings more details to her appointments than some of her specialists, and uses them as sounding boards for her ideas as often as they provide new ones.

      The unfortunate truth is that, well, a lot like technology, the knowledge of the human body has grown far too broad for any one person to contain. No doctor you visit is going to be perfectly helpful right off the bat unless they are already an expert in your case. Most general doctors are not those experts, nor do they have long hours to spend on research for one patient at a time. I compare it a lot to the auto repair biz; the shops are too busy getting and completing work to know that your particular model usually has a faulty relay on the radiator fan, and if it starts to go the heat issues will start cracking at gaskets and seals. They just fix the oil leaks in front of them. If the patient can help the doctor do their job, and as the one with symptoms the patient is in the most key position to, it goes a long way.

      The upshot of any of this seems to be - quality information is key. If that comes from your doctor, or the internet, so be it. In the best situations one informs the other - the doctor will mention a term you can key off of in your research, you bring back more specifics that he can use to narrow a referral, that doctor knows the medications and the common pitfalls, from there you can find all the other people that have the same and all the details of what doesn't and does work for them. The highest quality of information are those details that *HELP*, and anything that doesn't help (doctor or website, and there's plenty of both that don't) needs to be set aside so that progress can be made elsewhere.

      You are your own science project, really. Make the most of it.

    7. Re:Self-diagnosis by u38cg · · Score: 2

      one bonus when it comes to childbirth!

      And nine months previously ^_^

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    8. Re:Self-diagnosis by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      "Ex-wife". So you helped her get back into life, and she rewarded you by bailing?

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  4. It's the "you can't sue us" escape clause. by SeaFox · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Even WebMD—the service that has given so many cyberchondriacs the fuel to continue guessing—has a note on every single one of its countless pages that states the site “does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.”

    Oh come now.
    The reason that line exists is obviously for legal liability, it isn't any sort of evidence of how accurate (or lack of) WebMD considers their own information.

    1. Re:It's the "you can't sue us" escape clause. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      While it's certainly useful from a liability standpoint, it also is there to recognize the simple fact that a list of conditions/symptoms is not, and could never be, a diagnosis.

    2. Re:It's the "you can't sue us" escape clause. by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's about the accuracy of their information. It's about your own "qualifications" to make a diagnosis based on a web page.

      Reading a web page doesn't make you an MD. And if you spend your time reading descriptions of medical symptoms, sooner or later you'll find something you think applies to you. It happens to med students.

      And then you go into your doctor screeching about how you have Snarfelitis and desperately need the medication you saw on TV to treat it which Astrazenica is hawking for you to go ask your doctor about.

      When people get their medical information from the internet and TV commercials ... they're bound to end up clueless people who think they have some catastrophic disease.

      Because the most mundane of symptoms can be blown out of proportion once you get paranoid about them.

      A small amount of knowledge with insufficient context and education can be dangerous.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:It's the "you can't sue us" escape clause. by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's about the accuracy of their information. It's about your own "qualifications" to make a diagnosis based on a web page.

      It's about the Medical Guilds wanting to retain control over our health.

      If anyone told you that you shouldn't try to work out what's wrong with your car, and you should have to go to a qualified mechanic to get a piece of paper that allows you to buy replacement parts, which may not even fix the problem your car really has, you'd think they were insane. So why do people accept the same nonsense when their own body is involved?

      The last couple of times my girlfriend had to go to the doctor, we already knew what the problem was from a quick Google search, we knew what treatment she needed, but she still had to go to the doctor so he could say, 'Lo! this is exactly what you thought it was' and sign a piece of paper so she could buy the drugs she knew she needed. What a colossal waste of time and money.

    4. Re:It's the "you can't sue us" escape clause. by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      What a colossal waste of time and money.

      And had the treatment you thought you needed not worked, you'd be complaining the doctor was incompetent because they listened to you rather than doing their own research.

      Quite obviously you're a programmer because you know everything and your work is never wrong.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  5. Privacy and freedom. by EzInKy · · Score: 2

    Those are the costs of "connected" healthcare. Humans are a hateful venfeful bunch and maybe those qualities served them well in the past by ridding themselves of the ill suited for humanhood, but today the homogenity these qualities aspire to will also lead to mankinds demise. Diversity is the key to survival, not "sameness".

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
  6. I had either: The cold, The Flu or AIDS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WebMD once told me my sore throat and swollen lymph nodes was either a cold, the flu, or HIV.

    I had a good chuckle. I wonder if the service has gotten any better over the years....

    1. Re:I had either: The cold, The Flu or AIDS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I had Mono, my doctor told me pretty much that: Could be a cold, could be Flu, could be Mono - but it also could be HIV. And his bet seemed to be on HIV... Even after I told him that I never had anything close to intercourse, and did not share dirty needles :-)

  7. Early symptoms of many diseases... by EzInKy · · Score: 2

    ....are very similar, probably because the human body responds to different threats in similar manners. Self diagnosis is, at least today, the only way to busy bodies out of ones private business sadly.,

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
  8. Self-diagnosis by ledow · · Score: 5, Informative

    My ex-wife had a serious, debilitating condition that saw her in chronic pain and sometimes housebound.

    It was only when I met her and realised that there was something wrong that I asked her about it and she realised it WASN'T normal to be in constant pain, unable to walk. But there was more than that. The doctors had put her on painkillers, antidepressants, sleeping tablets, etc. to try to ease the symptoms but nobody had actually bothered to diagnose it.

    And there were odd things. Her joints were in constant pain but, when she wasn't hurting, she was able to do karate moves that Jean Claude Van Damme would be jealous of. She had an extreme range of movement. And when she was in pain, things like her knees and elbows would GO BACKWARDS, making it even more painful to do anything and making her unable to walk.

    We looked up the symptoms. The first batch of hits was Hypermobility Syndrome (now called Joint Hypermobility Syndrome). The list of things is gave as common side-effects and symptoms fit perfectly, as well as a number of things that until we read them we didn't think were related at all. It's a genetic defect in the way collagen is made, which gives so many odd and unrelated symptoms that it stands out by a mile.

    We printed everything off, went to the doctor. He was astounded. He'd never heard of it. He'd never realised she had the range of symptoms available to match it even if he had. He sent her immediately to a consultant specialist. In two minutes, and a simple joint-range test, he said "Yes, you have hypermobility". Within a month, she was able to claim disability. Within a couple of years, she was managing the condition and had enough support to return back to work and live a pretty normal life (even teaches karate). Because now she KNOWS what she has, she knows what to do and what not to do, and has constant, background medication of the right kind to combat the pain. At one point, she was going to be put on morphine to stop the pain because they just didn't know what it was.

    It was that easy. And it wouldn't have happened without a bit of Internet research. She'd suffered for nearly 30 years with it without any diagnosis (once she was told she might have arthritis - which is an extremely common misdiagnosis of hypermobility symptoms - but they excluded it because, well, she could move her joints more than anyone else!). And she'd had suffered at least several more if we hadn't bothered to check symptoms.

    Doctors aren't perfect. Don't just assume they are stupid, though. But only you know your symptoms, only you have the time and effort and impetus to find out what you have (especially if you live in a country where doctors get paid by the test, fucking disgusting), and only you are the one who will benefit if you find out what you have.

    The doctor was great, once he knew we were right. He was supportive and immediately helpful. He just didn't know about every condition on the planet. And although she has a diagnosis, there is no real prognosis - the condition never gets better, but at least you can manage it. The consultant basically diagnosed her and then that was it - there's nothing you can really do, medically, to "fix" it.

    So don't be a hyperchondriac and think you have everything. But if you're certain something's wrong, and you find something that matches, see what the differentials are and see if you can't get it eliminated. At the very least, if your doctors note that you asked about it and they said it "couldn't be" that thing, then you have something to go and push in their face when they turn out to be wrong. But more likely, they will try to appease you that it's NOT that thing, run a few tests, and therefore get you closer to a real diagnosis.

    Internet research isn't useless, if you have half a brain.

  9. Obligatory House MD reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    "Who needs med school when you've got wifi?"

  10. What other choice is there? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Physicians don't do diagnoses like they used to. They look at you, consider your condition for all of 5 seconds, and prescribe whatever will get you out of their hair. They don't diagnose, they don't think, they don't care. When I had my condition a couple of years ago, one of the doctors actually asked me what tests I wanted to run. I was like, what the fuck, how the fuck should I know? But that's how it is. So what is there to do? Do your own research on the internet and become your own pathologist. :( And unfortunately there are tons of spammer optimized-for-google pages out there for every medical condition in the world. They all have a few paragraphs of useless copy and tons of ads inline. Go to a forum? It's all the same, pages of questions and few answers. So you have to spend tons of time learning about your symptoms from the ground up, and then try to guess what you might have, and then go ask a doctor for those tests. Good luck diagnosing yourself, because doctors don't do that shit any more.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:What other choice is there? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's my gf's experience as well. Unfortunately her symptoms are somewhat generic and fit a wide range of conditions (MS, Parkinsons, epilepsy, spinal issues, stroke, the list goes on) so self-diagnosis is pretty useless, and since these cover several medical specialisms, each physician so far has said "It's probably [something that's not his specialism]". The last one said it's probably psychological. Great. "Luckily" the other day she had an attack right there in the neurologist's office, who was so shocked that at least they agreed to run a series of tests to start excluding some possibilities.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:What other choice is there? by houghi · · Score: 1

      Physicians don't do diagnoses like they used to.

      They do it a lot better then they used to. The fact is that they just do not know everything. There are so many symptoms that might lead to so many problems that is is just not possible.

      And most of the things will just go away by themself if you take a bit of rest. Further: many people lie when they are at the doctor and he takes that into account, even if YOU are telling the truth.

      When my aunt was born, the doctors told she would not become 6 weeks old. She became 115 and the oldest person in the world. (Opensourced her body for science). One docter later told me : she bacam that old not thanks to us [doctors], but despite us.

      And it is great to bash doctors, while remembering that they diagnose 99% correct is a lot harder. They are not magicians. You must accept that sometimes they just do not know, which is the best case, because then they can tell you to look elsewhere. Sometimes they misdiagnose.

      I was misdiagnosed for a few years. The doctor and myself thought I had weak ankles as I sprained them a lot. Now I know that was not the case. I had a gout attack each time.
      As it was in my ankle and none of any of the other issues related normally with gout, he did not see it.

      Some rest and it was over, so the sprained-ankle idea seemed to be good.

      At one point he asked if some medical students could see it and they came up with the identical wrong diagnosis. Luckily at that moment we already knew what it was and he could teach them something.

      So doctors still DO that shit and they do it better then ever as they also use the Intertubes to look things up (at least the many doctors I know.)

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    3. Re:What other choice is there? by NormalVisual · · Score: 2

      Physicians don't do diagnoses like they used to. They look at you, consider your condition for all of 5 seconds, and prescribe whatever will get you out of their hair.

      Until I moved a couple of years ago, I had a doctor that was the exact opposite. It wasn't unusual for him to spend half an hour going over things with me, and he also practiced what he preached - the guy was in his 60s, but didn't smoke and was ridiculously fit. He was also almost always behind on his appointment schedule, but I cut him a lot of slack because he actually did spend time with his patients and was truly interested in their health.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    4. Re:What other choice is there? by Charliemopps · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Physicians don't do diagnoses like they used to. They look at you, consider your condition for all of 5 seconds, and prescribe whatever will get you out of their hair. They don't diagnose, they don't think, they don't care. When I had my condition a couple of years ago, one of the doctors actually asked me what tests I wanted to run. I was like, what the fuck, how the fuck should I know? But that's how it is. So what is there to do? Do your own research on the internet and become your own pathologist. :( And unfortunately there are tons of spammer optimized-for-google pages out there for every medical condition in the world. They all have a few paragraphs of useless copy and tons of ads inline. Go to a forum? It's all the same, pages of questions and few answers. So you have to spend tons of time learning about your symptoms from the ground up, and then try to guess what you might have, and then go ask a doctor for those tests. Good luck diagnosing yourself, because doctors don't do that shit any more.

      You're right. It's because doctors have "Stats" now. Like they're DSL tech support reps. The HMO's got tired of the doctors ordering all that expensive "Treatment"

      Every time I go in I take in all my own literature, much to my doctors dismay who gets irritated and once even suggested that I had Hypochondria. I said, "Great, you finally made a diagnoses. Now treat me." Unsurprisingly he did not schedule a followup mental health appointment for me. When I got to the doctor I go well prepared like I'm about to file a lawsuit. You have to bully doctors into doing their jobs these days.

    5. Re:What other choice is there? by Jesrad · · Score: 1

      This has been my experience too, unfortunately. But, hey, at least your doctor straight-out asked you what tests you wanted. I had to argue with mine just to get to that point.

      For most of my life I’ve had episodes of tachycardia, intense nausea+vomiting, severe muscular weakness and dizziness happening seemingly randomly sometimes after physical exertion or exposition to cold. I’ve had an abnormally early puberty with almost absent secondary sexual characteristics. Also, at times my limbs become paralysed, unable to move at all except for breathing and talking, it usually happens after resting.

      The crises receded in my 20s when I became prediabetic and grew very fat, and came back with a vengeance after I followed a very low carb diet in my 30s, lost the extra weight and suppressed my HbA1c back to healthy level. In a few of those ‘new and improved’ crises I almost died, so I firmly committed to finding an explanation and possibly a cure. The occasional paralysis also came back.

      I went to my GP who prescribed a dozen blood tests, then some more, and then assumed it was all in my head somehow. After more arguing and disproving some of his false assumptions (mostly about my character and reactions to stress) he grudgingly dismissed me to an endocrinologist. I thought I was making progress at last.

      The endo swept most of the lab tests aside and just assumed that I was overdosing on vitamin D (which I only had been supplementing in the previous winter months). So I stopped all vitD and saw no improvement on the crises’ front.

      I talked about all this to a (rather unorthodox) psychotherapist, in case it really was in my head all along, and this guy suggested instead it might be some rare genetic disease at play. He then asked for a second opinion from a friend of his, a surgeon with a fondness for puzzles, who accused me of either being insane or of lying about my symptoms and lab results – because it all made no sense to him and he had no answer.

      I never held the medical profession in any special regard to begin with, to me they’ve always been highly-trained workers with heads full of precious, specific knowledge but with little wisdom to connect it all and make sense of it except in the most common clinical cases. But even if I had special consideration for them, I’d have certainly lost it after all this, because they’ve been right next to useless. All the useful data I got so far came from blood tests I had to pry from them with pointy words, all their proposed treatments failed, all their explanations conflicted with already present evidence. It’s like they have no curiosity at all, and little training in actual science – as in epistemology = the proper way of forming beliefs from objective reality.

      To think that there are millions of people like me, all with all kinds of rare diseases that all these doctors know little or nothing about, that the medical profession fails to help in the same way, is rather unnerving.

      To this date, and all on my own using the Internet, some dangerous self-experiments and my college training in science, I have finally figured out diet adjustments that really do work for me, preventing the crises and drastically reducing the frequency and severity of the paralysis episodes. It consists of avoiding a long list of food items, and gobbling salt by the gram nearly every day. I’ve had zero crisis since.

      The websites that actually helped me: support groups' forums for people with CAH and Addison's disease (neither I have though... mine might be pseudohypoaldosteronism type 1, except it’s unusually mild and with a late onset, and covers only half the symptoms), Wikipedia's trove of pages about steroidogenesis and associated disorders, and several obscure publications on PubMed about specificities of organ-specific aldosterone receptors and the genetics thereof.

      At this point the “proper” thing I should do is find a geneticist an

      --
      Maybe we deserve this world ?
    6. Re:What other choice is there? by Jesrad · · Score: 1

      My wife's GP was just like that, but France's socialized healthcare structure made life impossible for him so he moved to Switzerland :(

      --
      Maybe we deserve this world ?
    7. Re:What other choice is there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A doctor once told me "We don't find out what is wrong with you, we find out what isn't."

      Several years ago, I had a condition causing me problems that seemed to mystify the doctors. Test after test after test - many several times - going from doctor to doctor. I finally did some research on my own, and found something that might have been it. I contacted a doctor that was known for these cases, after a few minutes describing what was going on they asked me to send over my medical records. A few days later they called me back with an appointment date. I was correct - I had a rare condition. I could have been wrong, of course, and wasn't sure - but that's the thing. I said "I seem to fit the symptoms of this, and lots of tests have ruled out A, B, C, so maybe I have it - I'd like it if you could take a look at see what you think." I didn't call them up and say "I have this rare condition and you must see me because the internet says I have it." As others have said, it's about common sense. Chest pain? Oh look, that's a symptom of a a heart attack!.... or maybe you're just having some heartburn. In my case, I had six months of tests that had ruled out a large amount of common things. I don't blame the doctors - many of them had probably never heard of what I had, and they were doing exactly what they should have been doing, looking a the most common things that caused my issues and going down the list from there. The problem with the internet is, someone takes a symptom and finds the most horrible thing they can, reads horror stories about it, and suddenly think this one symptom means they have this really rare thing and won't listen to the professionals who want to do tests for common things first.

  11. The downside of one-sided propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    TFA is a naked propaganda from the medical profession

    They made up a new term by attaching "cyber" to one of their existing term to denote the 'foolishness' of their patients

    But on the other hand, the medical profession themselves never - and dare not to - tell the world how many patients they have killed, either due to mis-diagnose, or wrongly prescribe medicine to their patients

    I won't mention any other case other than one that happened to my dear old dad --- he has high blood pressure and every single day he has to take medicine to put his blood pressure back into the 'normal' range

    One time a doctor (not the same doctor, but another doctor) prescribed him another medicine (for what I forgot) and when he took that new medicine with his high blood pressure pills his blood pressure shot way up, to 200 over 160, or so

    Alarmed at that all the other members my family were about to rush him to the hospital, I gathered up all his medicine and ran a check online

    Long and behold, the new medication, as indicated by many online sites, can *NOT* be taken with the type of high blood pressure medicine that my dad was taking

    I asked him to stop taking that new medication, and within 8 hours his blood pressure dropped back to his 'normal' range (by only taking his usual high blood pressure medicine)

    Yet, the medical profession tried to imply that people like me who checked information online are 'cyber' whatever

    I rather be 'cyber' whatever than put my blind trust on anyone, especially those who could - intentionally or not, - prescribe me medication that can burst my arteries and veins

    1. Re:The downside of one-sided propaganda by Carewolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Woah there. Relax.

      Anything that promotes professionals over quacks and amateurs is a good thing. Considering the source of health information for most people comes from nonsense planted into the news media by quacks, I can't see anything negative in promoting talking to professionals.

    2. Re:The downside of one-sided propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Long and behold, the new medication, as indicated by many online sites, can *NOT* be taken with the type of high blood pressure medicine that my dad was taking

      And this is why I trust pharmacists more than doctors when it comes to prescriptions, and make sure they know *everything* I'm taking at the time, even if it's only ibuprofen.

    3. Re: The downside of one-sided propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, by your logic, anyone can read something on the Internet and replace a postgrad education.mim going to out and build a spaceship today. Or maybe go out and take a F22 for a spin. My feeling is that this sort of hubris means you have a union job doing some sort of recycling.

    4. Re:The downside of one-sided propaganda by jonnythan · · Score: 2

      No, it really is kind of a big deal. WebMD is for-profit and largely funded by advertisers such as pharmaceutical companies. The site uses clickbait-style headlines to drive page views and actively preys on fear.

      http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02...
      http://www.washingtontimes.com...

      (I replied to the wrong post above, sorry for the dupe)

    5. Re:The downside of one-sided propaganda by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 2

      My impression is that most physicians feel they have far too little time to investigate and think about patients' problems. In the U.S., I imagine that comes from a limited number of doctors, (proximately) from insurance companies.

      I'd wager that if doctors, especially GP's, had twice as much time per patient, a lot of your concerns would be alleviated.

    6. Re:The downside of one-sided propaganda by BigSlowTarget · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >I can't see anything negative in promoting talking to professionals.

      Thanks, that will be $70 for removing a splinter, $70 for a cold that can't be treated, $70 for a minor sprained ankle that you should just stay off of for a week or two. There are times for professionals and there are times that they simply aren't needed. If you don't have hundreds of dollars to spend listening to people tell you something is minor and to come back if it gets worse then you need to use sound judgement instead of running to the doctor with every boo boo. Sound judgement includes consulting reasonable information sources but it all to often seems they are paywalled, tort-terrorized into saying "just see a doctor" or blocked out by quackery websites.

      That doctor traffic also is why often you can't get an appointment to have someone look at a significant condition for a week and a half and why Americans go to the emergency room so often - where they can wait long periods before being treated for serious issues. That is the downside in promoting talking to professionals. There is no downside in shooting down quacks unless worse quacks take their place.

    7. Re:The downside of one-sided propaganda by LaurenCates · · Score: 1

      They made up a new term by attaching "cyber" to one of their existing term to denote the 'foolishness' of their patients

      I have a hard time taking anything titled with "cyber" in it seriously.

      Everytime I hear "cybersecurity" I keep thinking we're getting a call from several decades back and science fiction is looking for a lost prefix.

      --
      Some people don't believe in fairies. I don't believe in The Patriarchy.
    8. Re:The downside of one-sided propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks, that will be $70 for removing a splinter, $70 for a cold that can't be treated, $70 for a minor sprained ankle that you should just stay off of for a week or two.

      Don't go to the doctor if you have a cold. That is stupid. And two, get a health insurance, or move to a place where one is provided for you.

    9. Re:The downside of one-sided propaganda by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      The $70 for removing a splinter is a small price to pay to avoid sepsis. Of course, you don't get charged $70 unless you can't get the damned splinter out and the wound disinfected and bandaged yourself. Minor sprain? It's terrible how that might actually be a fracture. You might want to have that checked out. However, most people who can still walk on it get by fine with RICE - rest, ice, compression, and elevation. And a call to my doctor's office on these things tend to get that message from the care team given a call. Same with having a cold. The last thing the doctors' office wants is some germy asshole who doesn't need to be there running about giving everyone else his or her cold. And they will tell you to stay away unless there's actually a sign of secondary infection for which one might need antibiotics.

      I don't know what the medical profession ever did to you (other than charge you money - a separate topic which should be discussed elsewhere), but people are not overusing minor issues to visit doctors. In reality, in 1998 (first thing I found when I Googled "medical encounters annually US), there were less than ~4 medical encounters (counted as doctors' visits, ED visits, hospitalizations, nursing home admissions/discharges, and home care starts/discharges)/per person annually. The growth numbers since then don't show anything particularly interesting except for a minor spike when PPACA came out, because people who didn't have medical care before are getting it now.

      "Cyberchondria" isn't driving anything, but your straw man arguments about people flooding doctors' offices for minor issues are bullshit, too.

      --
      That is all.
    10. Re:The downside of one-sided propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a member of the Northern California Kaiser Permanente HMO. Some people complain about them because it can be difficult to get treatment for common stuff. And it can be. You have to call into their advice line in order to schedule a non-routine appointment. And most of the time the nurses and doctors on the advice line tell you that you don't need treatment. If you persist they'll schedule an appointment[1], but every Kaiser doctor I've interacted with is not a pushover when it comes to ordering or prescribing something he or she doesn't believe is necessary.

      Never have the nurses or doctors seemed less than professional, even when I've disagreed with them. But unlike every other healthcare group I've experience with, Kaiser doctors are clearly under very strict orders to _not_ order treatments that have not proven efficacious[2], and that includes not even scheduling an in-person appointment without good cause. OTOH, sometimes they heavily promote stuff, like breastfeeding, where the science is backtracking, even when it costs them extra money. (They employ a dedicated team to shame you for not breastfeeding--which is super annoying even when you're dead-set on breastfeeding.) And that's fine. They can be wrong as long as I know they're following good science as best they can.

      Anyhow, I guess my point is that obtaining advice from a professional does not require spending hundreds of dollars on an in-person visit with your primary physician or a specialist. Rather, healthcare providers need to provide more options, and patients needs to become better at and more accustomed to interacting with a team of professionals.

      [1] That is, if the doctors on-call with the advice-line nurses don't write a prescription on-line. Which they'll often do for cold and flu stuff--prescribe decongestants, analgesics, sleep aids, etc.

      [2] OTOH, Kaiser in-sources their lab work. It's so cheap for them that the doctors will order a blood test at the drop of a hat. Also, if you have diabetes they employ a large, dedicated team which will call you every week to track your blood sugar levels, make sure that you're testing properly, and berate you if you're not following their plan perfectly. (My wife had gestational diabetes.) At the end of the day it's all about minimizing their costs and maximizing their profits, but I think Kaiser proves that patient health can be the better for it. But it requires that doctors are placed in the feedback loop wrt monetary costs, which they are at Kaiser given that it's an HMO. It's worth point out that as regulated professionals doctors derive no benefit from the corporate veil, so they're always personally on the hook for bad corporate policy, which is a decent balance to administrative profit seeking. And Kaiser doctors are employed by a subsidiary which operates as a profit center, so it's not easy for the bean counters at the insurance subsidiaries to control doctor hiring practices, which means they can't easily arrange to hire only compliant and pliable doctors.

    11. Re:The downside of one-sided propaganda by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Thanks, that will be $70 for removing a splinter, $70 for a cold that can't be treated, $70 for a minor sprained ankle that you should just stay off of for a week or two.

      Thats more a problem with health care in the US being profit based.

      For me it's $0 to remove a splinter, $0 for a cold (I'll need a medical note for work if I'm going to be off for a few days) and $0 for a minor sprained ankle (to be fair, the doctor will give me some compression bandages for my $0).

      But we have a well regulated (gasp) medical system that isn't built for profit. We also dont have long wait times. If need be I can see a doctor in anything from a few minutes to a few hours at a walk in clinic. The longest I've ever waited at a walk-in clinic was 2.5 hours.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  12. Nothing freaking new by JockTroll · · Score: 0

    In the 1889 novel "Three Men in a Boat" by Jerome K. Jerome, the protagonist enters a library, gets some medical books and diagnoses himself to being afflicted by all ills known to mankind except the housemaid's knee. This makes the trope Older than Electric Lightning. Go away.

    --
    Geeks are so full of shit that "beating the crap out of them" takes a whole new meaning.
  13. Better WebMD than Wikipedia by bluegutang · · Score: 1

    At least WebMD doesn't have editors going around changing medical articles to make them more negative and pessimistic, while no more informative or accurate than before.

    It's like, The placebo effect is one of the most important contributors to patient recovery, so why are you TRYING to destroy it?

    1. Re:Better WebMD than Wikipedia by dmbasso · · Score: 1

      Uncross your arms
      Take and throw them to the cure
      Say, "I do believe."
      Uncross your arms now
      Take 'em to it
      Say, "I do believe
      I do believe."

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
  14. nothing new by bmimatt · · Score: 1

    Move on, nothing to see.
    Hypochondria is alive, well and getting stronger. Look how big pharma companies have been trading. Look at the slew of new "diseases" and the "disorders" that were not considered anything other than an expression of an energized growing human youth.

  15. Personally I use WebMD for Information by msobkow · · Score: 2

    Personally, I use WebMD for information about something after I or a friend have been diagnosed. I guess I'm not "most people." :P

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  16. New usage of article summary. by ttucker · · Score: 1

    Does this guy's summary seem like an editorial post?

  17. MS Band by SternisheFan · · Score: 2

    So Microsoft Band does not work reliably, glad others have paid to test that out, saves me from spending my money.

  18. Be involved with your health by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm baffled, how being more involved in your own health is a bad thing. Oh, internet bad! Obamacare bad? This is how it has always been, don't expect others to care more about your health than you do.

    1. Re:Be involved with your health by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      I'm baffled, how being more involved in your own health is a bad thing.

      Because if people didn't have to go to a doctor to tell them the obvious and prescribe the drugs they already know they need from five minutes on Google, doctors might not be able to buy another Porsche.

  19. Better than bogus and fraudulent medical bills... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, some of these tech gadgets are garbage but It's better than being thrown through a gauntlet of tests that are no way related to your alignment followed by being slapped with a $5000+ bill...

  20. ah yea... by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

    I've heard this and heard this. I say, SCREW DOCTORS. Oh... I'm making you do your job by looking things up on the internet. I'm sorry if I'm messing up your "Stats" by refusing to take the random pill you suggested this week and requested an actual exam.

    I've had a couple of health problems in my life that went on for years I went through doctor after doctor, pill after pill and no doctor went further than whatever the last drug rep to visit their office had suggested. In one case I had almost constant fatigue, I was falling asleep in the middle of the day, then would get manic, sweating profusely. They blew me off, told me it was "All in my head" sent me to a shrink... Then Finally my wife was watching Opra one day and that's when she had her Thyroid issues and went on T.V. to tell everyone to get theirs checked. Her symptoms were similar to some of mine so I went back to the doctor and asked "Have you ever checked my TSH?" It's a standard, rudimentary test for thyroid function that everyone should have checked once a year by most accounts. The doctor looked through my chart... nope! Sure enough I had Graves Disease. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G...
    Opra Winfery diagnosed me. I'd been through probably a dozen doctors and it was a talk show host. Even then, my regular doctor and a specialist refused to do anything.. at all... saying that even medication would mess up their testing! This went on for months. I switched doctors, the new doctor also refused and suggested that the HMO had procedures he had to follow. Eventually I ended up having a Thyroid Storm: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T...
    and ended up in the Emergency Room. They called an on-call Endocrinologist who was floored my levels were at what they were at and prescribed me medication and told me I needed to demand Radio-iodine treatment asap. I explained all the trouble I was having and he said "Once they get this ER bill I doubt you'll have any more trouble." He was right. I switched HMO's 2 months later.

    Doctors can burn in hell. They don't care about people, they care about keeping their HMO/PPO happy and making their bonuses. I could have died because of their incompetence and focus on their bottom line.

    1. Re:ah yea... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2

      Doctors these days are employees - just like you. Your boss tells you to "improve quality" (i.e., "financial quality") by increasing throughput, sticking to Bayesian most-probable/most cost-effective care pathways, and sticking to the script, you'll do it, if you value your job. Remember - just because a doctor doesn't diagnose you correctly (especially for low probability conditions) doesn't mean he's diagnosing everyone incorrectly. In fact, outliers happen.

      Sorry for your bad experience, but medicine is statistics/quant driven these days (just like everything else). The fact is that you did get a diagnosis and your doctors acknowledged that after you brought it to their attention. What more do you expect from a system that's chronically understaffed and seems to exist (like other systems in our country) to funnel ever-larger amounts of money into corporate coffers? Don't be pissed off at your overworked doctor - be pissed off at the corporations and hospitals that make sure there isn't time to do adequate diagnosis.

      --
      That is all.
  21. Of course you can take things too far... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    but I've always thought it was strange that people will spend days learning about, debugging, and fixing their car or computer, but if something is wrong with them they assume they can't learn about it and help themselves.

    1. Re:Of course you can take things too far... by Idarubicin · · Score: 1

      but I've always thought it was strange that people will spend days learning about, debugging, and fixing their car or computer...

      Who are these "people"? Sure, there are some who will do this - and this being Slashdot, we've probably got a population enriched in them - but if you take a random person with a car or computer problem, they will just ask (respectively) their local mechanic or teenager--in exactly the same way that many people approach their doctors.

      Yes, there exist people who will try to troubleshoot their cars, computers, or their own bodies. And there exist subsets within those groups who can are capable of doing so in a way that makes things better rather than worse. Most people aren't comfortable going beyond the most basic diagnostic steps in any of those three spheres, however. Putting gas in the car is their limit; checking the oil and topping up the washer fluid is something that happens at the dealership, and borrowing an OBD-II reader to interpret a Check Engine light is in the realm of black magic.

      Worse, there are also people who spend good money on magic grounding straps for their cars, insist on clicking on VIRUS WARNING links in spam emails, and who actually believe stuff that homeopathic practitioners tell them.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  22. that's butt covering by X0563511 · · Score: 1

    “does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment” is legal butt-covering, and shouldn't be taken as anything else.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  23. WebMD a starting point by jittles · · Score: 2

    Anytime I feel like there may be something wrong with me, I consult the symptom tracker on WebMD. Do I then go into my doctor and tell them that I have x, y, or z? No. I go in there and present my symptoms to my doctor and get their expert opinion and see whether it coincides with what I read online. I don't try and steer them in any particular direction. But when the doctor decides that I should be tested for z, I can have an intelligent conversation with him about what that actually means, and whether or not that is a useful course of action for me. Should these sites disappear because of hypochondriacs? No. They will just go to the library and check out books to self-diagnose their crazy diseases. You can't fix that sort of mental disorder by hiding information from people. Does it cause frustration for doctors? Absolutely. But the doctors should educate their patients on the appropriate use for these tools. None of the doctors I know have ever had a discussion with their patients about online medical resources. They just go home and huff and puff to their friends and family how they have to fight with WebMD empowered patients.

    1. Re:WebMD a starting point by Bigby · · Score: 1

      I do a similar thing these days. I lost my trust in doctors (which appear to be turning into the IT industry real fast...bad) one an emergency visit. I was having heart palpitations at seemingly random moments. When it happened on an airplane, it really freaked me out. So I went to a doctor as I was going to fly to Europe and didn't want it to happen again. They did an EKG and blood tests. They found nothing and said it must be anxiety. Anyone who knows me knows I am the least anxious person out there. And this didn't happen when I was actually anxious. I told that to the doctor, but his diagnosis stood. I don't know what the heck he prescribed. I never used it.

      No problems overseas for that whole week after it was happening nearly daily.

      After I got back, it was happening again. It was really bad when I was driving home one day after work. I thought about what I did that day that was WAY more than typical. I thought about how I drank like 60 oz of Coke Zero. I stopped drinking it for 2 weeks. No issues. Drank it again to see if it was an issue and had heart palpitations in about 12 hrs. So I looked at the ingredients, cross referenced the Internet for heart beat issues, and BAM. I found aspartame. I stopped drinking Coke Zero again and had no issues. Then I chewed some gum as a test and the symptoms came again.

      The next time I went to the doctor (swine flu), I told him that I found the palpitation issue and described everything I found. He appeared shocked. Maybe he took it to heart, but I don't know. Every time it happens now, I can look back at the last 24 hours for anything different that I ate. I always find aspartame. It now happens like once a year, which happens to be when someone puts that crap in brownies or something.

      For the record, no issues with other fake sugars.

    2. Re:WebMD a starting point by bhv · · Score: 1

      Seems inevitable to me that the number of those that will self-diagnose and even attempt self-remedy whenever possible is on the rise. High deductible plans are becoming the norm.

      I wonder how many are labeled as hypochondriacs who are really financially forced to make best guesses via whatever online resource(s) and experiment with homeopathic solutions? Yes there are plenty of true hypos out there, but besides those.....I wonder!

    3. Re:WebMD a starting point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Seems inevitable to me that the number of those that will self-diagnose and even attempt self-remedy whenever possible is on the rise"

      Why would you believe that? Until very, very recently in history most Americans didn't have access to a physician even if they wanted to see one. Billions of people around the world still don't. Diagnosing and treating your own ailments is one of the oldest human pastimes. As is just suffering through whatever you have and dying prematurely.

      All these websites where people exchange remedies and dish out diagnoses is just an extension of stuff they've been doing for millennia, and there's no reason to believe that they're doing it more today than before--the only difference is that all the chatter is archived and searchable.

      My money is on things being way better today than yesteryear, period. Even if there's a slight regression compared to a decade ago (which I don't buy either) because of the Internet, we're still living in a medical wonderland.

      Real hypochondriacs are few and far between. IMO, the problem with most people today is *not* that they're constantly fretting over stuff they read online. It's that they neglect preventive care and wait until they're severely sick before seeking attention, just like always. And it's only when they're severely sick do they cruise WebMD and other sites to collect enough information to annoy their doctor. So the annoyance factor may have gone up, but the substantive issues probably haven't changed, or if they have they've only gotten better--easier and more convenient access to real professionals.

  24. There's no such thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no such thing as "cyberchondria", just hypochondria with people that read the internet rather than books to fuel their suspicions. Let's please stop with the made-up-just-now-term-let's-see-if-it-sticks buzzword click-bait bullshit.

  25. Not new ... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    People have been using the interwebs to fuel hypochondria for at least a decade. Starting with WebMD and moving on.

    I was once told by someone that pretty much a huge chunk of med students develop it for a period ... because you suddenly start to know what every symptom might suggest and you start looking for it.

    It's called Medical Student's Disease, and sounds like it's been referenced for over 100 years.

    So, surprise. Having access to the medical descriptions of disease can make you paranoid.

    Only now it's digital and anybody can do it (and then go into their doctor with their own 'diagnosis').

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  26. Re:Better than bogus and fraudulent medical bills. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps most people can't afford the crushing medical bills and insurance payments.
    Example: Took friend to emergency clinic due to a fall.
    Just wanted to be sure nothing was broken.
    One nurse took blood pressure, asked questions. Took about 3 minutes.
    One tech took one xray. Took about 5 minutes.
    One doctor looked at xray and said, "nothing broken, if pain take some over-counter stuff, you can go home now" Took about 5 minutes.
    We waited around over two hours for that information.
    Bill arrived.
    Emergency clinic: 3,800 dollars
    xray dude: 500 dollars
    doctor: 500 dollars
    WTF ?
    Now I know where the crooks hang out !

  27. New Years resolution by koan · · Score: 1

    Lets all stop using the word "cyber" it's not the 90's mmmmm kay.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    1. Re:New Years resolution by steak · · Score: 1

      you mean I don't have to say www anymore?

  28. I'm famous ? by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

    Actually, that's not how I envisage the meaning of the term. I made it up for myself years ago to describe people who are essentially luddites, or otherwise stumped by and suspicious of technology, and always blame the system for their own clueless user mistakes. Like those who claim they must have a virus because they "mysteriously" have 17 folders called "New Folder" on their desktop.

    --

    Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  29. but, but, but.... by steak · · Score: 1

    morgellons

  30. A lot of doctor hate in the comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you or your loved one is in the ICU, I doubt you are going to be screaming "F the doctors, bring me a tablet so I can google this!"

  31. GPs vs Specialists by jasenj1 · · Score: 1

    I remember a scene from "The Love Boat" of all places. The ship's doctor, a GP, and another doctor, a specialist, were arguing.

    Specialist: "GPs know less and less about more and more until they know nothing about everything."

    GP retort: "Specialists know more and more about less and less until they know everything about nothing."

    This was a great example of the explosion of knowledge we've had in modern times. GPs can't keep up with everything we are learning, specialists focus their knowledge. As patients we are required to navigate this landscape.

  32. Sometimes the Internet saves lives by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    Like that one time a guy peed on his girlfriend's pregnancy test, got a positive result and posted a picture on Reddit.

    Someone pointed out it was a sign of testicular cancer and saved the dude's life.

  33. Incompetent doctors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had achilles tendonitis for three years. Three doctors and one physiotherapist were totally useless, and it was the internet that let me discover some research papers describing and evaluating a fairly simple eccentric exercise protocol that's used to treat this problem. If I didn't research this myself, I would probably still be hurting. (Several years later, my physiotherapist friend told me the other medical professionals were just idiots. That said, they are idiots with excellent reputations and reviews.) So if I have to contend with incompetent healthcare providers, I'm damn well going to second-guess them with my own research.