FBI Access To NSA Surveillance Data Expands In Recent Years

itwbennett writes The FBI's access to email and other data collected from overseas targets in the NSA's Prism program has been growing since 2008, according to a 2012 U.S. Department of Justice inspector general's report declassified last Friday by the DOJ in response to a Freedom of Information Act request by the New York Times. Here are some of the milestones mentioned in the report: In 2008, the FBI began reviewing email accounts targeted by the NSA through the Prism program. In October 2009, the FBI requested that information collected under the Prism program be 'dual routed' to both the NSA and the FBI so that the FBI 'could retain this data for analysis and dissemination in intelligence reports.' And in April 2012, the FBI began nominating email addresses and phone numbers that the NSA should target in it surveillance program, according to the document.

Comments

Scope creep ...

[gstoddart]

As usual, we get the scope creep beyond what they told us it would be used for.

I think at this point we can safely conclude the FBI and the NSA (and every other TLA) are actively fighting against the rights of people, as well as undermining the law.

They're more than happy to become the total surveillance state.

And what's really pathetic is people seem to think this is OK.

Papers please, comrade. But don't think for a minute we're not listening.

Stasi

[fremsley471]

I have complete confidence that my phone calls, email and web traffic are all 100% monitored and have been for sometime. Now the people who used to try and refute this accusation and call you a tinfoil hat wearer, just shout "Barbarians at the gate".

The next game has started. It's your devices' outputs they now want. If Orwell could have imagined the ubiquity of networked cameras and microphones, he'd never have had to invent the telescreen. If you've nothing to hide...

Yes, "overseas targets" my ass

[Rujiel]

Americans' web access often involves several hops abroad. Your reassurances of safeguards are undermined by every new news story indicating the NSA has broken its own rules countless times when spying on Americans. You sound like a shill.

hmmm

[Charliemopps]

What happened in 2008 that allowed them to change their policies?

Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

Re:hmmm

[Charliemopps]

If I remember, didn't Obama run on a platform that included implementing the recommendations of the 9/11 Commission? The same 9/11 Commission that concluded the attacks happened because the FBI and the various intelligence agencies weren't talking to each other and sharing information?

Watch and learn: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

And there's nothing inherently bad about that.

Yes there is. Go read the constitution. It's spelled out very plainly there. There is no ambiguity.

The problem isn't that the agencies are sharing information, it's that they're sharing information that's outside their lane. And that occurs not because they're sharing information, but because they're outside their lanes to begin with. I'd much rather have agencies that are focused on not sifting through every American's data, than ones that do that but don't share it with each other.

You've no idea how this works do you? They are collecting everything so that should a crime happen, they can retroactively comb though everything you've ever done to find evidence against you. It's like the local police placed cameras in your home and then said it wasn't a search because they wont look at the tapes unless there's a crime. But in reality, they really are looking at the tapes, but that's beyond the scope of this conversation.

But know this: This really is the nightmare scenario of 1984. There is direct and solid documented proof that they are doing exactly what all the conspiracy nuts were terrified of. It's not myth, its real. The only difference is, our government has not yet used this insane power to subvert the publics interest that we know of. But remember, at no time in human history has a government ever refused to exercise dictitorial power. It's only a matter of time until we elect the next Nixon or Stalin... and that person will use the NSA powers to make you wish this was just some sort of joke. But it's not. You should be horrified that your government feels it's Legal to do this.

The land of the free

[msobkow]

Freedom to be surveilled.

Freedom to be arrested.

Freedom to be jailed.

Re:FBI also does counter intelligence

[Vitriol Angst]

Yeah, I notice how many foreign agents and bankers the FBI gets.

I'd like for once the FBI not to arrest someone from Green Peace, a protestor with Occupy Wall Street, a group of homeless men who had an FBI handler who put them up to it.

Eric Holder could take the Fed Chairman and the heads of Goldman Sachs and prosecute them for all sorts of crimes -- anyone paying attention will know about the abuse that one company has made. Why is this not happening?

There is nothing "legit" going on -- merely agencies preserving the status quo and a government owned by the people who they have to borrow from to get into office.

Abolish them both.

[jcr]

The FBI and the NSA routinely commit felonies by the billions.

When an entire organization violates the oath of office that all of its employees must swear to, it can't be fixed.

-jcr

Re:"Overseas" Targets?

[zlives]

nah we just call hops in chicago,LA, NY... "seas" and once data travels over "seas" its good to go.