Slashdot Mirror
Being Pestered By Drones? Buy a Drone-Hunting Drone
schwit1 writes, "Are paparazzi flying drones over your garden to snap you sunbathing? You may need the Rapere, the drone-hunting drone which uses 'tangle-lines' to quickly down its prey."
From The Telegraph's article: It has been designed to be faster and more agile than other drones to ensure that they can't escape - partly by limiting flight time and therefore reducing weight.
“Having worked in the UAS industry for years, we've collectively never come across any bogus use of drones. However it's inevitable that will happen, and for people such as celebrities, where there is profit to be made in illegally invading their privacy, there should be an option to thwart it,” the group say on their website.
This seems more efficient than going after those pesky paparazzi drones with fighting kites (video), but it should also inspire some skepticism: CNET notes that the team behind it is anonymous, and that "Rapere works in a lab setting, however there aren't any photos or videos of the killer drone in action. The website instead has only a slideshow of the concept."
There was that old sf story by Robert Silverberg, I think, that went like this: They made automated police drones (they weren't called drones back then) that prevented any violent crime from happening. Unfortunately they had learning circuits and decided even killing animals for food or harvesting crops was violent crime, and the society ended up starving. The solution was to create a new kind of drone to kill the existing drones - but this also had learning circuits and it decided it had to kill everyone.
Looks pretty realistic these days. Anyone remember the name of the story, and the author if i got it wrong?
I apologize for the lack of a signature.
How big a market is this "defensive" drone problem? Seems more likely the market is bullies chasing down innocent drones
Gently reply
Just to play devils advocate for a few seconds, wouldn't it be cool to have a small canon to launch something like a fishing-line "hairy ball" at the drone, which would jam the moving parts, but if it hit a human would just bounce off them?
Like bullet-powered guns are meant to kill people, but good luck hitting a drone that is moving quickly.
we've collectively never come across any bogus use of drones
"Intelligence" is the ability to ignore what you find inconvenient, I guess.
Put 4 big helium ballons and place nylon wires between them. Operates 24h a day and is cheap.
Worst. Name. Ever.
It's inevitable, someone will strap a nailbomb to a drone and do something and then all drones large enough to carry an explosive will be strictly regulated. It's only a matter of time.
Unless the knowledge of a peeping tom is annoying, then high flying drones wouldn't be much of a nuisance. For low flying drones:
http://hackedgadgets.com/2008/12/29/diy-net-gun/
Being Pestered By Drone-Hunting Drones? Buy a Drone-Hunting Drone-Hunting Drone.
Or use Drone-Hunt evading scanning and sensing technology.
Come on people! We work in IT! Surely we can come up with a better name.
Oh.
More like Vapore.
A solution in search of a drone, in search of a problem
(too long to fit in the subject line)
Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
Assuming this was actually a problem, a spring-loaded net gun would be a cheaper, easier, unregulated solution to the whole problem. You don't need much of a net, either - just some monofilament to tangle the drones' rotors.
I'm waiting for the integrated home air defense package complete with radar and surface to drone missiles.
The drone war has!
An easyer solution and way more fun :-):
Hawk vs. Drone: 1 - 0
We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
Neighbour's greenhouse smashed by falling illegal drone (over my or neighbour's land), downed by my legal drone (over my land, possibly on autopilot). Who's liable?
Help build the anti-software-patent wiki
You guys are going about this all wrong. Combine a targeting system with a decent laser and you can blind the camera and kill the drone at the same time. No need for dueling drones. Just make sure your system can tell the difference in a passenger aircraft or helicopter and a drone... It could go badly if you manage to punch holes in a police helicopter.
"Having worked in the UAS industry for years, we've collectively never come across any bogus use of drones."
If blowing up children and unidentified (who cares if they are innocent or not) folks who just happens to be in the area is not bogus, what's the problem with somebody taking pictures?
What a bunch of ethically challenged folk.
I thought this article was going to mention the General Atomics MQ-1 Predator drone.
Integrity First
Service before self
Excellence in all we do
Just like grabbing a paparazzi camera and smashing it on the ground is illegal, using a counter-drone to destroy a (potentially) legally operated mini-UAV is going to be illegal. I guess if you are in the middle of your ranch and they are clearly trespassing you might be OK.
Begun, the drone wars have.
Model rocketry Surface to Air Missiles are next, it seems.
Uh, Linux geek since 1999.
FFS /. stop wasting my time.
Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
I'm looking forward to live broadcasts of "Drone Wars Above Beverly Hills" (as celebrity and paparazzi drones are battling it out)!
Most drones operate using either 2.4 or 5.8Ghz frequencies for control. Seems like downing a drone just requires a RF jammer with a directional antenna. I suppose that the targeted drone can still get up again once you stop jamming it, so that's a difference compared to the fighting drone.
I also suppose this wouldn't block drones that were set to operate autonomously.
And let the lawsuits commence. Are we taking bet on which Hollywood rag will be the first to post nude images take with RC choppers with cameras?Im betting not only actors and famous people will the only ones raped by the eyes in the sky.
Jack of all trades,master of none
drone operators would only need to glue razorblades on the tips of the rotors
Which would Only affect the entry aerodynamic stability of the craft, making it just as likely it would slit the operators throat on launch as it would be to slice through anything, or be controllable at all...
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
I feel like this needs a complete Dr. Seuss treatment.
http://www.progressiveengineer.com/profiles/maynardHill.htm
Transatlantic and intercontinental.
I think there was an episode that covered this exact line of thought.
12-gauge shotgun with modified choke ought to take out the plastic birds
if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
Creating drones to fight other drones. Read Robert Sheckley's "Watchbird".
...is some MS Paint doodles and a domain name? No wonder CES was filled with so much garbage this year.
The second you disable another drone in flight you become liable for any damage it does coming down. If someone gets injured or something gets damaged the owner of the attack drone in on the hook. It could also be considered destruction of private property if what the drone was doing was legal.
You, because it was your actions that caused the damage, even if it was "on autopilot".