Slashdot Mirror


Regular Exercise Not Enough To Make Up For Sitting All Day

An anonymous reader writes: Toronto researchers have found the amount of time a person sits during the day is associated with a higher risk of disease and death, regardless of regular exercise. The paper, published Monday in the Annals of Internal Medicine (abstract), found that prolonged sedentary behavior was associated with a 15 to 20 per cent higher risk of death from any cause; a 15 to 20 per cent higher risk of heart disease, death from heart disease, cancer, death from cancer; and as much as a 90 per cent increased risk of developing diabetes, said Alter. And that was after adjusting for the effects of regular exercise. ... Engaging in 30 to 60 minutes of moderate to vigorous daily exercise does not mean it's OK to then "sit on your rear" for the rest of the day.

13 of 348 comments (clear)

  1. Excellent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    So there is no reason to regularly exercise any more!

    1. Re:Excellent! by bhagwad · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, nice try by whoever wrote the report. I have no intention whatsoever of ungluing my ass from my seat. A 15% higher risk is a trivial price to pay for a lifetime of luxury and decadence.

  2. We'll get paid a risk premium now, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Considering how dangerous that desk job is...

  3. "15 to 20 per cent higher risk of death by wiredog · · Score: 3, Funny

    from any cause"

    Isn't the risk of death from any cause 100%? At least for us mortals?

  4. is sleeping for 8 hours straight as bad? by kenj123 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm going to set my alarm clock to go off every hour at night so I can take a 5 minute walk. i'll live forever.

    1. Re:is sleeping for 8 hours straight as bad? by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm going to set my alarm clock to go off every hour at night so I can take a 5 minute walk. i'll live forever.

      Congratulations! When's your wife due?

  5. Re:Cause, or effect? by Culture20 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Are sedentary people more likely to die, or are people more likely to die sedentary?

    Dead people are more likely to be sedentary.

  6. Re:Limited power to change working situation... by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 5, Funny

    You can get up and take a five minute smoke break every 30 minutes.
    Sitting on your ass all day sounds so bad, taking up smoking might actually be a net-win.

  7. Re: higher risk of death by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just want to know how sitting on my ass all day increases my chance of being eaten by a shark by 15 to 20 percent.

    You don't stand a chance against a Land Shark if you're sitting down.

  8. Simple solutions by nickname100 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Just get Obama to mandate that no one is allowed to exercise and no one should walk by taking short breaks at work.

    Then you will see an immediate change in all of the U.S with droves of people running to the gym

  9. Re: higher risk of death by MisterSquid · · Score: 3, Funny

    I just want to know how sitting on my ass all day increases my chance of being eaten by a shark by 15 to 20 percent.

    You don't stand a chance against a Land Shark if you're sitting down.

    Plumber

    I didn't ask for a plumber. Who is it?

    Telegram

    --
    blog
  10. Being Alive Shown to be Deadly. by McFly777 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Being Alive Shown to be Deadly.

    After several years of exhaustive research, scientists have found that the greatest single contributor to death is being alive. "In 100% of the cases, the subjects death was preceded by a period of being alive," said one researcher. Even after eliminating other potential contributors, such as accidental death, suicide, etc. and adjusting for the age of the subject, the statistics remain strong. "If you are alive today, then you may die tomorrow."

    With the rise of Obamacare, these findings could become even more vital, due to the potential effect that such details could have on the total cost of the program. "I think the insurance industry has known this for years, and has been keeping it away from public knowledge," said one official under condition of anonymity. One possibility would be to establish initiatives to curb the spread of being alive. "By reducing the number of people who are alive, we could significantly decrease the number of deaths, regardless of cause. This could amount to trillions of dollars in government savings, but I am not sure if the general public would be willing to give up on such a well established habit," he continued.

    --

    McFly777
    - - -
    "What do people mean when they say the computer went down on them?" -Marilyn Pittman
  11. Correlation by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 4, Funny

    You're saying that correlation is a leading cause of causation?