Slashdot Mirror


One In Five Developers Now Works On IoT Projects

dcblogs writes Evans Data Corp., which provides research and intelligence for the software development industry, said that of the estimated 19 million developers worldwide, 19% are now doing IoT-related work. A year ago, the first year IoT-specific data was collected, that figure was 17%. But when developers were asked whether they plan to work in IoT development over the next year, 44% of the respondents said they are planning to do so, said Michael Rasalan, director of research at Evans.

42 of 252 comments (clear)

  1. I'm 4 of 5 by heezer7 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I had to google IoT....

    1. Re:I'm 4 of 5 by dcollins117 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I had to google IoT....

      Me too. I had no idea that many people worked at Institutes of Technology.

    2. Re:I'm 4 of 5 by Smallpond · · Score: 5, Funny

      I had to google IoT....

      I just asked my toaster.

    3. Re:I'm 4 of 5 by psergiu · · Score: 3, Funny

      And the toaster told you it means Internet of Toasters, right ?

      --
      1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
    4. Re:I'm 4 of 5 by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Funny

      there isn't an IoTa of awareness

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    5. Re:I'm 4 of 5 by ATMAvatar · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Your toaster may be internet-enabled now, but my teapot has been internet-enabled for years. It even has its own HTTP status code (418)!

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    6. Re:I'm 4 of 5 by iggymanz · · Score: 4, Funny

      Holly: "Strike a light! I'm a genius again! I know everything! Metaphysics, philosophy, the purpose of being-everything! Ask me a question, any question, and I'll answer it."
      Talkie Toaster: "Any question?"
      Holly: "Yes."
      Talkie Toaster: "How to break the speed of light? How to marry quantum mechanics and classical physics? Any question at all, truly anything and you will answer?"
      Holly: "Yes."
      Talkie Toaster: "OK, here's my question: Would you like some toast?"
      Holly: "No, thank you. Now ask me another."
      Talkie Toaster: "Do you know anything about the use of chaos theory in predicting weather cycles?"
      Holly: "I know everything there is to know about chaos theory and predicting weather cycles"
      Talkie Toaster: "Oh, very well. Here's my second question: Would you like a crumpet?"
      Holly: "I'm a computer with an I.Q. of 12,000. You don't seem to understand; I know the meaning of the universe."
      Talkie Toaster: "That's not answering my question."
      Holly: [irritated] "No, I would not like a crumpet! Now ask me a sensible question, preferably one that isn't bread related."
      Talkie Toaster: "Very well. I have a third question. A sensible question. A question that will tax your new I.Q. to its very limits and stretch the sinews of you knowledge to bursting point."
      Holly: This is going to be about waffles, isn't it?"
      Talkie Toaster: Certainly not. And I resent the implication that I'm a one-dimensional, bread-obsessed electrical appliance."
      Holly: I apologise, toaster. What's the question?"
      Talkie Toaster: The question is this: Given that God is infinite, and that the universe is also infinite... would you like a toasted teacake?" --- Red Dwarf ep. "White Hole"

    7. Re:I'm 4 of 5 by jd2112 · · Score: 2

      I had to google IoT....

      Well, you could also have clicked on the link in TFA, for a change!

      You must be new here...

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    8. Re:I'm 4 of 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    9. Re:I'm 4 of 5 by DrXym · · Score: 2

      I doubt many programmers would know what IoT means because it's an acronym for utterly meaningless umbrella term.

    10. Re:I'm 4 of 5 by QRDeNameland · · Score: 2

      A good overlord never waffles.

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
  2. Computers are things. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Computers are things: Computers are on the internet: my code is on computers...

  3. lot of that going around by turkeydance · · Score: 2

    hope they get paid a lot of money.

  4. What's more irritating? by AdamStarks · · Score: 5, Informative

    The whole "Internet of Things" craze, or article summaries that presume everyone knows the acronym?

    1. Re:What's more irritating? by Harlequin80 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Internet of Things has actually managed to surpass my hatred of "The Cloud"

    2. Re:What's more irritating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Imagine giving devices, like data loggers and sensors, an IP address.

      CONGRAUTLAMALATIONS! YOU'VE INVENTED THE INTERNET OF THINGS.

      Seriously, that's all this bloody well is. Sensors communicating with IP. Possibly with some "big data"-style analysis tools.

    3. Re:What's more irritating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think I was the dork who invented the term. I said it accidentally to my boss who repeated it to sever of his bosses. Then they started using it at M2M conferences....

      It is just remote sampling of data. Pumping it thru some wireless service. Then acting on it at the server level in some way.

      Thats it.

      They got *very* excited one day when I added in remote control of stuff. I had to as that was the only way to get some controller to cough up its data. They then started speculating on webs of things and 'Internets of things' all talking to each other.

      They started making the remote ends 'smart' and talking to each other. When they are missing the whole point that they should be stupid sensors hovering up as much data as you can and let the backend server take care of it.

      They ended up with 500-1500 dollar controllers and projects that never end. One dude took my whole set of code and rewrote it. Not because it needed it. But because it didnt exactly match his style guide. Even though I had one. It didnt match his. 2 years later he had the exact same thing as I did with no new features and no customers (they got bored and found someone else to do the remote sensing). That group could have owned large segments of the market (they were 2 years ahead of everyone). Now they have nothing as everyone caught up very quickly.

    4. Re:What's more irritating? by arth1 · · Score: 2

      Internet of Things has actually managed to surpass my hatred of "The Cloud"

      Both will end up as roadkills on the information superhighway...

    5. Re:What's more irritating? by istartedi · · Score: 2

      Internet of Things has actually managed to surpass my hatred of "The Cloud"

      You need to put the two together... for synergy.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    6. Re:What's more irritating? by Harlequin80 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was actually thinking about leveraging the parallel symmetries that exist between the paradigm shifting next generation technology that is the INTERNET of THINGS and the once in a generational market disrupting future shaping technology now known as The Cloud to achieve never before seen levels of synergy, segment alignment and leading edge thought processes, allowing us to disrupt old world dinosaur markets and take us into the new age of Big Data.

  5. FUCK YOU WHAT THE FUCK IS IOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    JESUSFUCKING CHRIST

    1. Re:FUCK YOU WHAT THE FUCK IS IOT by thegarbz · · Score: 5, Informative

      http://lmgtfy.com/?q=iot

      Smart, but if we're going to substitute the jobs of editors with Google then maybe we should go all out. Instead we're paying useless editors who don't actually do their job and circumventing it through a tongue in cheek website that provides you with a Google search.

      Also I'm in China you insensitive clod. Can you Bing it for me instead?

  6. Here we go again. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    With almost half of all developers thinking of switching to working on the IoT next year, I smell yet another bubble. IoT mania will be the new App mania.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    1. Re:Here we go again. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      With almost half of all developers thinking of switching to working on the IoT next year ...

      No, half of the "developers" said they were working on IoT in a survey they had to complete to get a free magazine subscription. There is no reason whatsoever to believe the results of that survey have any connection to reality, or that the people taking the survey were even developers.

  7. Reasons why I don't like the Internet of Things. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here's a list of reasons why I don't like the Internet of Things:

    1) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I sleep.

    2) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I pee.

    3) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I make kaka.

    4) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I pleasure myself.

    5) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I wash my body in the shower.

    6) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I relax in the tub.

    7) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I brush my teeth.

    8) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I make passionate love to my wife.

    9) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I brush my hair.

    10) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I read a book.

    11) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I read Slashdot.

    12) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I bake cake.

    13) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I put in my contact lenses.

    14) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I get ready to play golf.

    15) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I do my laundry.

    16) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I think about rugby.

    17) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I tie my shoes.

    18) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I celebrate the 4th of July.

    19) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I water my flowers.

    20) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I eat ham.

    21) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I use my stapler to staple documents.

    22) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I chew bubble gum.

    23) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I check the oil in my car.

    24) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I look for my TV remote.

    25) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I blow my nose.

    26) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I rearrange my stamp collection.

    27) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I listen to the Backstreet Boys.

    28) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I do my calisthenics.

    29) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I search for a paper clip.

    30) Internet of Things devices could send information about me to advertisers.

    31) Internet of Things devices could let advertisers use the data unsuspectingly collected about me while I sleep.

    32) Internet of Things devices could let advertisers use the data unsuspectingly collected about me while I pee.

    33) Internet of Things devices could let advertisers use the data unsuspectingly collected about me while I make kaka.

    34) Internet of Things devices could let advertisers use the data unsuspectingly collected about me while I pleasure myself.

    35) Internet of Things devices could let advertisers use the data unsuspectingly collected about me while I wash my body in the shower.

    36) Internet of Things devices could let advertisers use the data unsuspectingly collected about me while I relax in the tub.

    37) Internet of Things devices could let advertisers use the data unsuspectingly collected about me while I brush my teeth.

    38) Internet of Things devices could let advertisers use the data unsuspectingly collected about me while I make passionate love to my wife.

    39) Internet of Things devices could let advertisers use the data unsuspectingly collected about me while I brush my hair.

    40) Internet of Things devices could let advertisers use the data unsuspectingly collected about me while I read a book.

    41) Internet of Things devices could let advertisers use the data unsuspectingly collected about me while I read Slashdot.

    42) Internet of Things devices could let advertisers use the data unsuspectingly collected about me while I bake cake.

    43) Internet of Things devices could let advertisers use the data unsuspectingly coll

  8. Bad Site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The site requires you to register in order to read their articles. Don't both clicking the link. There's the free text:

    By Patrick Thibodeau
    Computerworld | Jan 28, 2015 9:45 AM PT

    One-in-five developers now works on IoT projects
    There are signs of explosive growth in Internet of Things development, and savings are being better defined

    By 2020, professional kitchens, restaurants and other large food providers will be using appliances with sensors and scanners. They will track inventory and provide real-time ordering linked to pricing. Sensors and cameras will be embedded in ovens, refrigerators and even pans and will do things such as track temperatures and ensure food isn't overcooked or spoiled.

    This "connected kitchen," as Gartner imagines and defines it, will contribute in five years at least 15% in savings in the food and beverage industry.

    Building a connected kitchen, and all the other things the Internet of Things (IoT) is promising to deliver, will take a lot of development work. There are signs that this development is beginning to happen.

  9. Re:Reasons why I don't like the Internet of Things by Gaygirlie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Pretty much all of those apply to a modern cellphone.

  10. Working on it right now by greg1104 · · Score: 3, Funny

    [gsmith@thing1 ~]$ ping thing2

    1. Re:Working on it right now by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 3, Funny

      that's nothing. I have a bit of the IoG (internet of ghosts) working:

      % ping elvis
      elvis is alive

      see! I told you!!

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  11. Re:Or maybe by Smallpond · · Score: 2

    Not the same. Embedded development was mostly about reducing cost by replacing custom mechanical and electronic devices with microprocessors and software. IoT is about taking inexpensive things and adding features in order to boost revenue, and also to create new revenue streams by collecting and selling personal data.

  12. Yes, the IoT is coming... by tlambert · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, the IoT is coming... as soon as IPv6 is fully deployed with stateless autoconfiguration so we'll have network addresses for all the things.

    I hear both Verizon and Comcast are really happy about the idea of offering routable addresses for everyone, without finding some way to monetize it.

  13. Wow by Idou · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's aIoT.

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  14. Re:Or maybe by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 3, Informative

    yup, not the same thing. IoT also is known as m2m or machine to machine. it tends to be sensor-based machines sending, then some analysis back-end (server) crunching thru the numbers (recently, realtime processing) and possibly sending back control signals ('turn this thing off', 'lower that value there').

    embedded is just a part of that.

    (I just got off a gig that was IoT related, fwiw)

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  15. Marketing Dipshits Do That On Purpose by TrollstonButterbeans · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Marketing types love acronyms because ...

    1) You don't know what it is, therefore they have the power because you have to ask them WTF they are talking about.

    2) It presents an opportunity to explain what it is.

    3) A new acronym is an exciting new concept!!! New word!

    4) The feel of knowing something and being able to talk about something and no one else understanding the private conversation.

    5) And some people respond to "magic letters" as being the easy secret they have been waiting for. Agile, ERP, CRM, URANUS, etc.

    (In all fairness, if your job is to sell and promote something corporatey, you do need to have methods for getting attention and engaging people. But it seems like there was a Dilbert cartoon on this.)

    --
    Priest: "Universe from nothing, no laws of physics, sped up time"+ huge discrepancies. Creationism? No. Big Bang Theory
  16. 1 in 5 uses of statistics are b***shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I call shenanigans.

    There is no way that 20% of all developers are doing IoT, unless you define IoT to include all mobile app development or any device that has the ability to talk over any kind of comms channel (eg local bluetooth connection from device to diagnostic tool or a wireless keyboard for a tablet etc).

    1. Re:1 in 5 uses of statistics are b***shit by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      Looks like it was a study by Gartner (can't be 100% sure, with the article behind a wall).
      And we know why Gartner makes up statistics: because real research is hard and doesn't pay well.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  17. Babel of IoT of many things by Mirar · · Score: 2

    It's just a pity that all ioT talks different languages. If only there were a secure, simple protocol so that they could talk to each other...

    SMNP would have worked, but it completely stupid in its ambition to be a superstandard....

  18. Re:It's an unecesary label for small things by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 2

    IoT, IoT, IoT, IoT.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  19. Re:Reasons why I don't like the Internet of Things by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 2

    I agree to some extent. The cellphone is the critical part, but the rest of it is definitely a nice bonus. I bought my first smartphone also rather late in the game, a little over two years ago, because my $20 flip phone finally died.

    Look at the benefits a powerful mobile computer gives you. It's a built-in navigation computer. You can actually research and look up who you want to call, say, if your car breaks down (better than simply dialing information). If your internet at home goes down, you can navigate to your ISP's website and get tech help numbers (this happened to me). And of course, it's a great entertainment platform - I can watch videos, read a book, or play a game anytime I'm forced to wait around. For many people, their phone can probably now replace even their home PC.

    Having a smartphone doesn't turn you into an asshole. There were plenty of those that existed long before those devices were invented. If they're not interested in engaging humanity around them, I probably didn't want to talk with them in the first place. I actually don't use my phone a whole lot, but I love the additional security and functionality it gives me when I can make use of it.

    --
    Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  20. Re:Reasons why I don't like the Internet of Things by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 2

    Pretty much all of those apply to a modern cellphone.

    A cellphone phone is a thing and it's usually connected to the internet. An internet of things no less.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  21. You Don't Need A Minicomputer... by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You don't need a minicomputer to call 911. You don't need a minicomputer to text your wife that you're running late. You might be surprised what a smartphone is useful for though.

    I've had a smartphone for about six months now, and before that I didn't really think I needed one. Now I know I don't need one, and right now I don't even have cell service, but I have found a number of uses for it anyway. I've used mine as a flashlight, a level, as a compass, and to check my pulse. They make you wish you had a real camera, thus fueling the economy, and they will do in a pinch if you need photographic evidence of something. It makes a great guitar or instrument tuner. It will translate text on a billboard. It saves paper for grocery lists. And there are about a half million things that any networked, powerful computing device would be useful for: games, alarm clock, programming, et cetera.

    However, I think I have an even better example. I came home for the holidays to Valdez, Alaska in 2011. As undoubtedly nobody knows, Valdez is by far the snowiest city in America with about 325 inches (8.25 m) of snow in a given year. That year was an extraordinary year for snow. By late January 350 inches lay on the ground, and this in a place where snow showers in May were not unheard of. Boats sank. Buildings collapsed. Everyone who could was shoveling. After the second time I cleared our roof the snow pile reached the second-story windows on every side of the house. This became a slight problem at about the same time when the heating fuel started to get low — the (chest-high) fill pipe for the house was now buried three times its height in snow. You'd think that these sort of permanent-house-features would be easier to find in this sort of situation. I spent about three days digging for the damn thing, but then remembered something a friend had mentioned: the magnetometers in smartphones can be used as metal detectors. I tromped in, borrowed my mom's cell, and found the pipe almost immediately. I'd come within a few inches of it, but then been digging in the wrong direction. It wasn't exactly a life or death situation, but it was pretty dire, and it was pretty much the only tool available that could have helped in that situation.

    I get your point that smartphones enable some people to be rather conspicuously vapid, but I'm not sure that they wouldn't be just as irritating with some other toy. I do think it's wrong to disdain the tool because of the users. I'm glad you don't need one. I'm glad I had one when I needed it. I'm pretty okay with having one now, even if I don't use it much. Most especially I'm glad that my mom doesn't live in a place that gets thirty feet of snow in a year. However, if you do happen to visit that terrible place, I highly suggest you bring a smartphone. You never know when it might come in handy.

    --
    Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
  22. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion