Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Launches Outlook For Android and iOS

An anonymous reader writes Microsoft today launched Outlook for Android and iOS. The former is available (in preview) for download now on Google Play and the latter will arrive on Apple's App Store later today. The pitch is simple: Outlook will let you manage your work and personal email on your phone and tablet as efficiently as you do on your computer. The app also offers calendar features, attachment integration (with OneDrive, Dropbox, Google Drive, Box, and iCloud), along with customizable swipes and actions so you can tailor it to how you specifically use email.

175 comments

  1. Big by ThorGod · · Score: 3, Informative

    Honestly I can't think of this as being anything but big. Companies live and die by outlook email still (enough of them anyway). So many of those executives don't even need a machine past email really...

    --
    PS: I don't reply to ACs.
    1. Re:Big by Chrisq · · Score: 2

      Honestly I can't think of this as being anything but big. Companies live and die by outlook email still (enough of them anyway). So many of those executives don't even need a machine past email really...

      I'm sure it will be big on corporate phones, but most individual users get everything the need from the built-in apps

    2. Re:Big by crbowman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yawn, the mail, calendar and contacts apps on my iPhone already work pretty well with the change server at work. Every now and then they stop syncing but I simply turn off the syncing of those 3 items and then turn it back on (I don't even have to delete the account info just flip 3 switches). Wait a few minutes till the phone sucks down the data again and I'm off. It's not outlook that's indispensable, it's Word, PowerPoint and Excel. Why would I pay for Outlook, the only thing I really miss is the ability to set my out of office messages from the phone. Filters are another things missing, but that's something that's complicated enough that the once every year I set one up I would just do it from my laptop. Am I gonna switch apps for that? Nope.

    3. Re:Big by arth1 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'm sure it will be big on corporate phones, but most individual users get everything the need from the built-in apps

      Not for much longer. The "mail" app in Android is going away, as they want you to use GMail.
      If you want e-mail that doesn't pass through or is stored on Google's server, to be gleaned by ad machines and three letter agencies, or if your mail server isn't available from Internet, you will have to use a 3rd party client.
      I hate how Outlook mangles e-mails, but still, it beats the alternative of e-mail that's stored and read outside my control.

    4. Re:Big by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people manage e-mail by categories, which is not available on the built-in apps.

    5. Re:Big by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Pay?

    6. Re:Big by crypticedge · · Score: 1

      I just pulled it up on my android phone, and it clearly says it's for office 365 only. This appears it won't function with exchange in a corp environment as it stands.

    7. Re:Big by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      They just unified the front ends for mail into the GMail app.

      I use Exchange through the GMail front end now. Means I don't have to fiddle about running multiple apps and switching between windows.

      Likewise you can add IMAP servers, etc.

    8. Re: Big by rickb928 · · Score: 0

      It's called Google Inbox, and it Sorts. Based. On. Categories.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    9. Re: Big by robbyb20 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Google inbox sorts my exchange email now?! Cool!

    10. Re: Big by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a web version feature. And that's not Exchange.

    11. Re: Big by EvilSurfinCow · · Score: 2

      You should check again. I was looking at this a few days ago and saw the same thing. Heard about it being released today and checked again and that line was no longer there. Regardless I installed it and it works with my work exchange account. Removed it though since it does not have sync schedules like the native client.

    12. Re:Big by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it will be great to get the experience of 30 seconds of hourglass every time you click on an e-mail on your phone.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    13. Re: Big by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Google inbox sorts my exchange email now?! Cool!

      Well you could get it to read from exchange

    14. Re:Big by Holi · · Score: 1

      Scroll down the play store a little bit more and you will see the actual Outlook app, not the O365 app.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    15. Re:Big by unixisc · · Score: 1

      One great thing about Outlook is the ability to recall mails. Will that be available in the tablet versions?

    16. Re:Big by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      One great thing about Outlook is the ability to recall mails. Will that be available in the tablet versions?

      I've never come across that but it does have a terrific function that sends a message saying so-and-so would like to recall that email. It's the best way I know to convince everyone that there must have been something in the email that was worth reading.

    17. Re:Big by lexman098 · · Score: 1

      No they live and die by Outlook on the PC interfacing with an Exchange sever. I've been able to get my email from Exchange on my Android phone for years now. I don't see any reason to use Outlook for Android. Just another non-system app.

    18. Re:Big by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      Why would this be a big deal at all? I get all my corporate Outlook email through my Samsung mail client without any problem. It even plays nice with contacts and calendar/reminders. It's way more stable than Outlook on my laptop, too. HATE Outlook 2013.

    19. Re:Big by unixisc · · Score: 1

      You're cooked if they do open that, but if the recipient is logged on to Outlook at the time that the mail gets to him, but hasn't seen or opened it, then the recall works, the mail gets deleted at the recipient's end, and no damage is done. As for content, sometimes messages may have been badly written or missed something critical: it doesn't imply that it was a secret waiting to be discovered.

    20. Re: Big by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google inbox sorts my exchange email now?! Cool!

      Well you could get it to read from exchange

      And get fired from your company for violating their IT corporate policy...which pretty much every mid to large sized company has.

    21. Re:Big by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Outlook ios one of the most buggy and crappy email softwares out there. Why let it poison android and OS X? M$ is poison. Everything M@ produces or even touches in any way is poison.

    22. Re: Big by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      if your compdoor fired you because you accessed their Exchange server on your phone, they are doing it wrong.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    23. Re: Big by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      It's on my phone as an app, and Exchange wasn't specified.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    24. Re:Big by jrumney · · Score: 1

      One great thing about Outlook is the ability to recall mails

      ????. One idiotic thing about Outlook is it gives non-technical cow-orkers the illusion that you can recall mails. Personally I get a bit sick of my mailbox being full of duplicate emails and recall notices because someone wanted to fix a trivial spelling mistake.

    25. Re:Big by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Mail from third party servers doesn't pass through Google's servers to be visible in the GMail app. If it did, it would also be accessible from Inbox. All they did was added the IMAP/POP3 backend to GMail so the interface can be unified.

    26. Re:Big by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why would I pay for Outlook [on my iPhone]..."

      You wouldn't - it's free.

  2. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Exchange on my built-in email on my iPhone has worked better than Outlook on my desktop since I first tried it in October of 2007. Exchange on iPhones works very well. What advantage could they possibly offer?

    1. Re: Why? by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      Is the Exchange client on Android possibly horrid? I've only used the regular stock IMAP client, but that was never very good, lagging behind the GMail app severely in terms of both features and polish. Maybe Android is the main reason?

      Also, I'm sure Microsoft would prefer their branding on any Exchange clients, just to stay in the execs' heads every time they check their e-mail... it's built in retroactive marketing that keeps their clients locked in.

    2. Re:Why? by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      I find the built in iPhone app lacking.. I'm willing to try any app that has Exchange support to see if it's better.

    3. Re:Why? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Agree with the assessment of the iPhone. It's not needed. Android OTOH this is a godsend!!! I can't emphasize that enough. I've had to help many clients with all their various Android make/models; a few of them won't support Office365 without downloading a 3rd party mail client. iPhones? I never had problem unless public DNS records are missing or invalid (such as autodiscover SRV record for example).

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    4. Re: Why? by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 2

      Exchange client on Android isn't horrible.

      This is because the ability of other apps to integrate with Exchange is getting too good.

      Just like if you understand the World of Warcraft protocols you can make your own WoW server, if you understand how to integrate with Exchange well, you could build a server that mimics it.

      That would be the end of a big cash cow for MS. Better that they have an Outlook app on platforms that they don't want to push than give up the revenue stream of Windows Server and Exchange Client Access Licenses. Once they have Outlook available for everything, they can subtly break the protocols for everything else, and when people complain, they can just point at the Outlook app.

    5. Re:Why? by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1

      The name "Microsoft" on the app.

      --
      "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
    6. Re:Why? by unixisc · · Score: 1
      Also on my Lumia, the built-in mail does Exchange really well. And Outlook doesn't come as a part of Office here. So, from the Outlook features that one would find useful at work:

      Meetings/Appointments - the Calendar app in WP8 does that really well

      Tasks/Notes - handled adequately w/ OneNote

      Mail - current mail in WP8 good for Exchange, Outlook.com, Yahoo! Mail, GMail, IBM Notes Traveller, iCloud, and other accounts

      Only thing - if one is in the habit in Outlook of following Franklin Covey methods of copying email to other functional folders like tasks or appointments, that's the only place where WP's mail falls short. Not otherwise.

    7. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > built in retroactive marketing

      That's one thing Microsoft gets. I like the term mindshare. Novell used to work perfectly, but no one ever thought about them. It just worked. I managed about four dozen Novell 3.11 servers and the vast majority of them had years of uptime when we shut them down. I think one hit four years! We replaced all of them with Windows NT, and it performed much worse despite being on hardware was typically five years newer. We charged per hour so Windows NT was very profitable for us, but it was bad for our customers. Of course our customers constantly thought about Windows NT, because they had to.

      There was even a story here about a Novell server that was shutdown that had sixteen years of uptime:

      http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/13/03/31/1230255/netware-312-server-taken-down-after-16-years-of-continuous-duty

      Sixteen months for a Windows server is a pipe dream much less 16 years!

    8. Re: Why? by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      Exchange client on Android isn't horrible.

      This is because the ability of other apps to integrate with Exchange is getting too good.

      DavMail is a nice little bit of software that allows just about anything to talk to Exchange. I have it on my computer at work so I can use Thunderbird (and Lightning) instead of Outlook. It sits in the system tray, only popping up a notification when a newer version is available. While I've not tried running it on a server so that multiple people can use it, my understanding is that you can do that with it as well.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    9. Re: Why? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      I believe the GP is essentially talking about the opposite situation.

      That is: regardless of how happy you are with the Outlook client (I mostly like it FWIW), the underlying feature set, which is implemented server side, is very, very, good, and cannot be easily replicated by open standards - though they are getting better. (At the very minimum, filters still have to be implemented client side. Leaving that aside though, Exchange server is a one-stop-shop for all groupwary things, and there's a stunning amount of ignorance in the FOSS developer community when it comes to figuring out why that's important.)

      Exchange's protocols are documented and Microsoft licenses them (including a one-off license to Google which is why there's an Exchange client in Mail.apk); the GP is suggesting though that this is probably not to Microsoft's long term benefit. The GP is suggesting Microsoft is building high quality supported clients so it can, ultimately, break the Exchange protocols in the longer term so that once the FOSS people wise up and build a good Exchange clone, they can't advertise, as a feature, that the server works with the clients everyone uses already.

      I... don't necessarily agree, FWIW. Partly I disagree because the documented protocols are not the protocols the official clients use anyway, so a working Exchange clone would be using undocumented protocols to support the official Outlook clients anyway, but mostly I disagree because Microsoft shouldn't care much - it's licensing the protocol for clients, there's no reason why it couldn't use the same licensing to restrict or extract money from third party servers too.

      In the mean time, may I repeat my call to the FOSS community to learn a little more about the subject. In particular, can you please learn about LDAP. Clue: if you don't understand why LDAP is relevant here, and think I'm talking about address books or something similar, you definitely haven't read enough about it.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  3. M$FT ON LINUX ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    VICTORY !

    1. Re:M$FT ON LINUX ! by war4peace · · Score: 1

      That's his personal opinion.
      Also, what does "I won" means? What would he win? being recognized? Already happened. A war? I didn't think there was a war going on (except within certain people's minds). Some competition? What was the competition about?

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    2. Re:M$FT ON LINUX ! by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      That's his personal opinion.

      So it must be right!

      Also, what does "I won" means? What would he win?

      He won a competition that he decided he was having. Now he gets to feel smug. That's its own reward.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re: M$FT ON LINUX ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's anything like the iOS version, then it's a shell arround OWA. Been using rhat clie t for a while on office 365. Why no landscape mode?

    4. Re:M$FT ON LINUX ! by war4peace · · Score: 1

      So... if I'm going to start drawing a sun on a piece of paper, I could say "If there's a sunrise, I won!" and be right. And smug about it.
      Fair enough, lemme get started immediately!

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  4. M$FT ON LINUX ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "If Microsoft ever does applications for Linux it means I've won."

    Linus Torvalds

  5. What's the point? by Johnny+Loves+Linux · · Score: 1

    What niche need does this app fill? If you're using Gmail, don't you already have access to your e-mail, calendar, whatever from any Android device and/or desktop? I'm trying to understand what's the point of this app? I'm a Linux user for example. What does this product give me that I don't already have for free on any platform? I don't use Windows so why should I (or anyone else for that matter) care? What's the killer app here?

    1. Re:What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exchange accounts most likely

    2. Re:What's the point? by bhcompy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Blackberry is all but dead in the corporate space. This leaves a hole that iPhone and Android are filling. Microsoft recognizes that Windows Phone isn't going to fill that gap, so they're finally moving their branding into those environments because of that. I'll assume that advanced features are/will be available that make it worthwhile to deploy the application in a corporate environment over the stock applications. The attachment integration with web based services already gives it a leg up on iPhone's Mail application. Not that I'm expecting it based on what's announced, I'd be very happy if there was a way to give it network folder integration within the network where Exchange is located.

    3. Re:What's the point? by madak3 · · Score: 0

      You've obviously have no idéa what Exchange is, and how (unfortunally) well used it is on corprations. Mail is more than SMTP & IMAP

    4. Re: What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also amazon is coming out with their outlook/iOS/android compatible workmail.

    5. Re:What's the point? by tysonedwards · · Score: 1

      All of your emails in one app. Gmail, IMAP and MAPI are presently in different apps.

      --
      Thirty four characters live here.
    6. Re:What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a non-Windows user presumably you're on some variation of U/Linux. I thought you chaps were all about choice!

    7. Re:What's the point? by DerPflanz · · Score: 1

      Not quite, with Google Apps for Business (perhaps also with normal gmail), you can POP your "normal" mail to your GMail environment. I have it all in one convenient location, including calendaring with non-business users. Also, the ICS invites work across platforms.

      --
      -- The Internet is a too slow way of doing things, you'd never do without it.
    8. Re:What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      | What niche need does this app fill?

      The one that prevents the large companies from switching to a different cloud-based email & calendaring vendor, because they have nice apps for the iPhone.

    9. Re:What's the point? by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "I'm a Linux user ... I don't use Windows so why should I *or anyone else* care?"

      Anyone else?
      Christ, did you read what you just wrote? Most people, by far, are not Linux users. You don't care, fine, it's not for you.
      Many, many people use office and would also like to use it on their iPad and Android tablets. For them this is good news.

    10. Re:What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No idea about MAPI, but the Lollipop Gmail app now does external IMAP too, as far as I am aware.

    11. Re:What's the point? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      What niche need does this app fill? If you're using Gmail, don't you already have access to your e-mail, calendar, whatever from any Android device and/or desktop?

      Yes, and so does Google, NSA, FBI, CIA, DHS, and many others. I prefer for others not to have access to my (or my company's) e-mail, calendar and whatever, but to connect directly to the e-mail, calendar and whatever server that's controlled by me (or my company).

      And even if the three letter agencies don't take an interest, when we discuss our building a better mousetrap in e-mails and meeting schedules, I'd prefer it if we didn't get bombarded with ads for pest control.

    12. Re:What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me rewrite the questions Does linux users benefit from this app, and how do non linux users benefit?

      It all depends on whether the company you work for have an echange server or not. If so, it might be good if you are a andoid or ios user. Linux on the desktop are not applicable, nor any other desktop system. Since the built in email app on android is horrible (imo), I have great expectation.

    13. Re:What's the point? by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      All of your emails in one app. Gmail, IMAP and MAPI are presently in different apps.

      Not on my devices. One email program handles multiple email clients.

      Now if I could just persuade the built-in Gmail listener not to pop up a redundant gmail notification alongside that apps notification...

    14. Re:What's the point? by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Delayed e-mail sending. Proper display of embedded MS objects (excel tables, PPT slides, etc). Seamless integration with calendar (yes, I will attend this meeting, it automatically synchronizes with calendar from e-mail). Proper contact lists (with attributes), integrated with corporate DBs. Embedded HTML signatures.
      These are just off the top of my head.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    15. Re:What's the point? by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      The GMail app now lets you add servers for other protocols as separate accounts that get managed in the same app.

    16. Re:What's the point? by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      There must be an option for this, because it's set when you install the Inbox app, which offers to suppress your GMail notifiers (otherwise, same problem, two pings for everything).

    17. Re:What's the point? by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      the default client for iPhone (mail, contacts, calendar) has supported the exchange protocol for many years now. This is all build-in. Ironically, SMTP is just for hotmail (which didn't support anything else as of last year)

    18. Re:What's the point? by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      The iPhone already have nice native apps that have the additional advantage of being build-in.

    19. Re: What's the point? by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      The plan where I work is to roll out first IOS and then Android apps to securely run corporate email, calendar, etc (?) Over the VPN. Then kill the BES servers.

      Security is a very big deal here. That's why the mobile apps are taking so long to be finished. BES is no longer worth the money, and we all want to use our own phone anyways.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    20. Re: What's the point? by msk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why anyone would want to let corporate tendrils into one's personal phone is hard, very hard, to fathom.

    21. Re:What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Blackberry is all but dead in the corporate space"

      You are confused and need to rest.

    22. Re: What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I guess you wrote your own OS for your phone. Otherwise it's way, way, way to late for your worries.

    23. Re:What's the point? by acoustix · · Score: 1

      the default client for iPhone (mail, contacts, calendar) has supported the exchange protocol for many years now.

      No, they have supported ActiveSync which is different from MAPI. They are not the same protocol.

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    24. Re: What's the point? by acoustix · · Score: 1

      The plan where I work is to roll out first IOS and then Android apps to securely run corporate email, calendar, etc (?) Over the VPN. Then kill the BES servers.

      Security is a very big deal here. That's why the mobile apps are taking so long to be finished. BES is no longer worth the money, and we all want to use our own phone anyways.

      Then use BES10 or BES12. It can create secure containers in iOS and Android that completely separates sensitive company data from the rest of the device - just like BB does. It's perfect for BYOD.

      I'm not sure that allowing the devices to VPN into the corporate network is a good idea. I'm not sure how you would control access without some sort of mobile management software like BES12 or other alternatives.

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    25. Re:What's the point? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      And even if the three letter agencies don't take an interest, when we discuss our building a better mousetrap in e-mails and meeting schedules, I'd prefer it if we didn't get bombarded with ads for pest control.

      You think that's bad? Ever since our last project went bad, and I said we were screwed, I got all sorts of condom ads!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    26. Re: What's the point? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Because BYOD is totally hip, you dinosaur!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    27. Re:What's the point? by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      I don't use Windows so why should I (or anyone else for that matter) care?

      I had no idea that only your opinion mattered! Please tell me what I should think about everything!

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    28. Re: What's the point? by div_2n · · Score: 1

      Because many corporations will not let you access corporate data (including email) outside of maybe a web front-end without having some kind of say in how your device behaves (example: screen lock settings).

      This means if you want native application access while on the go for convenience, you have two options:

      1. Carry two phones (personal and corporate)
      2. Let "corporate tendrils" onto your personal.

      It's worth pointing out that many corporations will provide a financial stipend to use your personal because that saves them money. Depending on your carrier and the size of the stipend, it could just about pay your monthly bill.

    29. Re: What's the point? by msk · · Score: 1

      I carry two phones. If they want me to have a phone, they'll supply it.

    30. Re: What's the point? by div_2n · · Score: 2

      Fine. But you said it was hard for you to fathom. Convenience and money are the reasons people take the other route. That's hard to understand?

    31. Re: What's the point? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Didn't get you. I too carry 2 phones. One of them - my employer doesn't get to know about, much less access: it's only for family. The other is something I freely use for work, provided the employer doesn't supply a phone. So far, I haven't been in the BYOD situation, but if I were, that'd be the phone that would be used. If the company apps don't work w/ it (it being the Lumia), they'd have to provide a phone.

    32. Re:What's the point? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      The biggest one for me - the ability to RECALL mails!!! I've done that a few times at work

    33. Re:What's the point? by war4peace · · Score: 1

      I'm using delayed e-mail sending. 10 minutes by default for any e-mail, manual send date/time for some. That way, if I forget to add an attachment, I can go to outbox, edit the message and resend.

      E-mail recalling depends on server-side settings, an admin can set up the server to disallow that.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    34. Re: What's the point? by msk · · Score: 1

      What's hard to understand is allowing that camel's nose under the tent of my phone's paltry security. If I could run the work phone environment totally virtualized and protect the rest of the phone from it, I would consider it.

    35. Re: What's the point? by ezelkow1 · · Score: 1

      The good thing about this outlook app, it must interface differently than adding an exchange account in ios or android through the normal means. This app does not require any sort of locking on your end or allow your company to erase your device. I just swapped out all my email clients on my nexus5 and ipad for the outlook app first because of that, but also IMHO it works so much better then the ios mail or gmail integration

    36. Re: What's the point? by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Then come to work here. That's our plan.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    37. Re: What's the point? by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      BES 1x doesn't do our corporate apps.

      The corporate VPN already does secure connections fine. Just a new client.

      And people want tablets that are not worth trying to shoehorn into BES.

      Oh, and it's all cheaper.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    38. Re: What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with this is that they can wipe your personal device. Newer phones only allow corporate data and the account to be wiped, but still....

    39. Re:What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's under Apps, Gmail, uncheck notifications.

    40. Re: What's the point? by acoustix · · Score: 1

      BES 1x doesn't do our corporate apps.

      The corporate VPN already does secure connections fine. Just a new client.

      And people want tablets that are not worth trying to shoehorn into BES.

      Oh, and it's all cheaper.

      I don't think you've checked. BES12 covers tablets just fine. I haven't tried to push apps yet, but I have heard that they are working to expand that area for iOS and Android.

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    41. Re: What's the point? by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Even if they had push apps, the value proposition isn't there any more.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    42. Re:What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to tell you this, but if you think that email from ANY provider is secure, then I hope you don't rely on that assumption.

      SMTP relies on known relays to deliver email. (It uses DNS lookups for the relay's MX record. The wikipedia for SMTP is actually quite good on this process: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/ind...)

      This means that every relay in between an email's source and destination will have a copy of it in memory, and is just as susceptible to as any other email service provider.

      So unless you are using some other form of security, (private key, internal mail server with a VPN, etc.), you should not expect that ANYTHING you send in an email is private.

      Hell, anyone on the chain between source and destination of ANY public network link, with physical access to that link, can snoop in on your traffic.

      Not to mention information leakage though other means. (Using your example: An engineering level employee using a web browser to look up the specs on the suggested parts, can have that look up associated with your company and sold to the highest bidder, who then attempts to determine what your company's interest in those parts may be.)

      Basically, rule of thumb: If it's too sensitive to be seen by the world, you should not use anything with remote communication ability when dealing with that subject. (At the very least not without extensive protections you construct.)

    43. Re: What's the point? by acoustix · · Score: 1

      Even if they had push apps, the value proposition isn't there any more.

      You could be right about the value, but in my job security trumps a small difference in value. I choose not to allow VPN to BYOD devices. I also chose to containerize business apps/email that cannot interact with the personal space on the device.

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    44. Re:What's the point? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      1: I run my own mail server.
      2: My friends run their own mail servers.
      3: Mail servers today support encryption.

      When a friend in sends me e-mail, there are no extra relays in-between. Their mail server contacts my mail server, establishes an SSL/TLS connection, and the mail goes.
      I then fetch it from my server through pop3s or read it on the server.

      There are a few vulnerable points here, but none of them are what you list.
      - Someone could hijack a DNS server that the sender relies on, adding MX records pointing to a rogue server.
      - Someone could man-in-the-middle, intercepting and substituting DNS server traffic real time to do the same.
      - Someone could man-in-the-middle insert a mail server intercepting port 25 and 587, pretending to be the recipient mail server.
      - Someone could arrest my friend and beat the living crap out of him.
      - Or me.

      But all in all, the majority of private e-mail I receive never lives in plaintext except at the end points, which are in our own control. I.e. we won't get caught in a dragnet where everything on an ISP's server is diverted and stored, or where a Big Mail Provider provides copies of everything. That's reassuring to me.
      Even if it, like anything else, is not 100% safe, it does mean that anyone reading my e-mail will only do so if deliberately targeting me.

      And the US government has shown is that they're perfectly willing to do large scale surveillance, intercepting communications of everyone. The prudent thing to do is not to swim in the seas they trawl.

      tl;dr: Don't use servers you don't trust.

    45. Re:What's the point? by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      Ok, but both work with an exchange server, right?

  6. Wasn't worth the time to download. by mmell · · Score: 3, Informative
    Seriously, there are way better clients out there. I use Touchdown by Nitrodesk for Exhcange for my work email - a truly robust and mature client, that. When Microsoft bought Touchdown, I thought for sure that would be the basis for their Android Outlook client. Sadly, Microsoft Outlook for Android looks very generic (a good thing I suppose - a consistent look and feel with the stock Android email client); that plain vanilla appearance is exquisitely matched by the client's plain vanilla lack of configurability and functionality. This app looks like a programmer's first effort at an email client.

    On a positive note, the application did install and run correctly, and appeared to offer support for several popular mail servers (Yahoo and Outlook among others, as well as IMAP and Exchange support).

    1. Re:Wasn't worth the time to download. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Calling touchdown robust and mature is laughable. That is the biggest pile of non-integratable garbage I have ever used.

      Native Email, or if higher security is needed, MobileIron Email+ are both FAR FAR superior solutions to the joke that is nitrodesk touchdown.

      Touchdowns interface is absolutely ugly and horrible, anything but user friendly, and does not behave or utilize android-specific functionality at all. It feels like a generic app shoehorned into working on whatever version it is installed on, integrating with nothing, shitting all over everything with poor ui/ux, and completely murdering battery life.

      No thanks.

    2. Re:Wasn't worth the time to download. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've also had to use nitrodesk touchdown in a corporate setting and I too loathed the application. Those claims are so outlandish, I have to ask, do you work for nitrodesk perhaps?

    3. Re:Wasn't worth the time to download. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For an Android app, it's pricey, but I like Nine. Works well, and you can move the corporate exchange security policies to the application, instead of the phone.

    4. Re:Wasn't worth the time to download. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It looks like Symantec bought NitroDesk, not Microsoft. See http://www.nitrodesk.com/About.html

    5. Re:Wasn't worth the time to download. by mmell · · Score: 1

      You're right. That explains why M$'s client sucks so hard.

  7. Well, that was fast. by caferace · · Score: 2

    First an investment in Cyanogen in the morning, then Outlook for Android in the evening. All in a days work. Maybe they'll buy XDA Dev tomorrow.

    1. Re:Well, that was fast. by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 0
  8. great Progress! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It won't be long before our asses are owned by all major companies in the field at the same time, while only using one device.
    If that isn't progress I do not know what is.

  9. Good Grief! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Said Charlie to Linus.

  10. Google could bring back Apps Sync by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    Awhile back Google started asking money for Google Apps Sync for Microsoft Outlook®. I think I speak for many when I say that this is a neat gimmick I could have continued using to sync my Outlook Calendar at work with my private Gmail Calendar. For Google that was one way to reduce MS' influence on Android by penetrating Outlook and make corporate users see alternatives. Alas, Google decided to make peanuts and the regular user stopped using Apps Sync for MS. I guess that now MS Outlook on Android considered by my employer for making workers more productive whilst using their own device. Security on Outlook for Android should be interesting.

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    1. Re:Google could bring back Apps Sync by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Awhile back Google started asking money for Google Apps Sync for Microsoft Outlook®.

      Around the same time they started asking for money to host a small domain.

      Although they dragged their heels for upwards of a year to getting it to officially work with Click-to-Run editions of office too (which is what most computers come preloaded with these days.)

      I'm glad this is here though; I heard Google was discontinuing their mail app (which I've been happy with - one of the few google apps I currently use) and pushing everything into their gmail app... which i HATE with a passion. So I've been anticipating selecting a new mail client when my S5 gets the next update.

      So I definitely will be looking at the microsoft mail client. Although there's several smaller players in the mobile email client space as well... and I don't know much about any of them either... yet.

  11. Secure? by TallGuy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    See http://www.theregister.co.uk/2... for some perspective...

    The iOS Outlook app uses a cloud to download your email (including attachments should you choose to want to see it). This may or may not be what you (or your employer) want. I know I won't be using it.

    1. Re:Secure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "uses a cloud to download"

      What does that even mean?

    2. Re:Secure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NSA = cloud download, indexing and archive service :p

    3. Re:Secure? by TallGuy · · Score: 2

      The iOS Outlook app outsources the server communication to an external server; this server communicates with your exchange server and stores all the data on that external server (in the Cloud). If you decide to want to see an attachment, the external server downloads and archives/keeps the attachment in the Cloud.

      Read the article I linked for more information.

    4. Re:Secure? by ThinkWeak · · Score: 1

      I read the article. Does it use the Office365 servers or something else?

  12. Attachments? by sys64764 · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know if this Outlook email client is able to view & download attachments that are part of a meeting in the calendar?

  13. This new slashdot sucks ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And Slashdot launches the beta in disguise of today's slashdot.org. The sales pitch could be "Now with 100% more white space, bigger fonts and double the scrolling and page loads needed." I just wonder, if we will get a rest of Skypefied UI soon, where the comments are in bubbles (blue text in blue background) and where bubble width is restricted to maximize the amount of scrolling needed.

    1. Re:This new slashdot sucks ass by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I haven't looked at beta in a while... does it still have the pointless generic stock photos on every story?

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  14. No ActiveSync by Andtalath · · Score: 1

    I hoped they would allow activesync with this.

    But, nope.

    This is kinda important since ActiveSync support has been removed in Android 5.0.

    Nine is one of the few clients that support it.

    1. Re:No ActiveSync by Geeky · · Score: 1

      The gmail app now supports Exchange accounts, and I'm assuming that's via ActiveSync?

      In any case, this news is confusing because there's been an Outlook app for Android for a long time. It's awful, but it does exist for outlook.com accounts - I assume the new one is different, but the name is confusing.

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
  15. Re:MSFT ON BSD! by Thanshin · · Score: 2

    Calling Android "Linux" is absurd.

    ... Because Android has no sentience and won't understand why you're calling it names?

    I can't find another way to make sense of your comment.

  16. Re:MSFT ON BSD! by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    I knew some pedant would come to write the "Android is not Linux" comment.

  17. storing my email credentials on an USA server by NoZart · · Score: 1

    yeah, not gonna happen.

    1. Re:storing my email credentials on an USA server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But your Googl, Apple or Microsoft phone has already "backed up" your WIFI credentials to the same country. Microsoft even sneaked this insanity to desktop Windows'.

    2. Re:storing my email credentials on an USA server by NoZart · · Score: 1

      good point. I always set those to "not back up", but i guess in reality it doesn't matter. Exchange credentials are a step closer to damage than WiFi, though...

  18. truly a sign of the appocalypse by kesuki · · Score: 1

    outlook? the germy infection vector for millions finally on android and ios? clearly seal number 4 http://madearth.net/index.php/doomsday/seven-doors/signs

  19. iOS for Outlook breaks your company security .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    “We provide a service that indexes and accelerates delivery of your email to your device. That means that our service retrieves your incoming and outgoing email messages and securely pushes them to the app on your device"

  20. Will it have the preview pane? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Will it have a preview pane that will execute all the macros in the email, fetch all the attachments and render them on screen on just a mouse over the subject line? Will it also disobey the native sandboxes in android and introduce "internet zone" "safe zone" "home zone" "vpn zone" "super trustworthy microsoft zone" etc? Great! Just what the world has been waiting for.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Will it have the preview pane? by plankrwf · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, they already have some nice features:
      http://www.tomshardware.com/ne...

      Kind regards,
      Roel

  21. Is it really new? by jjhues7676 · · Score: 1

    I have had an Outlook app on my Android phone for a couple of years. It also synced with my calendar.

    1. Re:Is it really new? by Quarters · · Score: 2

      No, and yes.

      It is Acompli, rebranded, but it's not the OWA app to which you are probably referring.

  22. Re:MSFT ON BSD! by Ogi_UnixNut · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you really want to be pedantic. Android is Linux, but it isn't GNU/Linux. Android uses the Linux kernel, but had its own userspace structure on top of it, which is not compatible with GNU/Linux (hence you have to specifically (re)write apps to run on Android).

    I guess it should be called Android/Linux, and the "normal" Linux we know on our PC's is GNU/Linux. The one time where there is a real-world reason for having these things spelt out in full (there used to be a large argument about naming conventions of Linux a few years ago. Whether it was important to have the "GNU" bit at the front).

  23. Re:MSFT ON BSD! by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

    Android is running Linux, just like your latest Ubuntu release. You know Linux is the kernel, right?

  24. Certificate Based Login by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    âUntil Android or Outlook on Android support certificate based authentication, it won't do much for me.

    From the application FAQ:
    Does your app support cert auth / certificate based authentication?
    If your Exchange server currently requires cert auth / certificate-based authentication, that is not currently something that we support.

  25. public folders by beefoot · · Score: 1

    I have used built-in and other mail clients on android. For the most part they are OK for emails. Contacts / Calendar works relatively well though I much prefer my personal contacts are totally separated from my work contacts. However, when comes to public folders, which my company makes use of, would be a god send if outlook client on android supports it.

  26. Quoting fixed? by Teun · · Score: 1
    One of the worst deficiencies of Outlook is it's lack of proper quoting rules.

    And why would you answer before the question?

    All together, Outlook is a corporate comms tool, not a mail client.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    1. Re:Quoting fixed? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      And why would you answer before the question?

      This battle has been lost, and you will now need a threaded email app.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Quoting fixed? by Quarters · · Score: 1

      Because.

      And why would you answer before the question?

  27. _Especially_ for Linux Users by csrster · · Score: 1

    The "why is this relevant for Linux users" crowd are spectacularly missing the point. This is interesting to me precisely _because_ I'm a Linux user. If I were a Windows user, I'd already _have_ Outlook on my PC! But I'm a Linux user and I don't, which is awkward as my employer uses Exchange. So now at least I have the possibility of trying Outlook on my Android phone. Whether it will _actually_ make a difference to me depends on the details: I can already access my email and calendar on Android with a bunch of different clients. But some features of Outlook are missing from the apps I've tried - browsing colleagues' Calendars for one.

    1. Re:_Especially_ for Linux Users by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      If I were a Windows user, I'd already _have_ Outlook on my PC!

      As crazy as it is...a stock install of Windows doesn't support Exchange Email. A stock install of OS X does....

    2. Re:_Especially_ for Linux Users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing stopping them is they'd have to pay themselves their extravagant activesync licensing fees :-)

      Office is their cash cow.

      But seriously, I wonder what stops someone from making an open source and free as in freedom activesync desktop client?

  28. Re:Secure? No - it just got banned by my employer by drmaxx · · Score: 2

    My employer just prohibited the iOS outlook app and shut down the access to the exchange server. This behavior will change very soon - as many will follow. This violates any halfway decent safety protocol.

  29. Not Great by Virtucon · · Score: 1

    First, OWA only lets you link up with Exchange or Office365 accounts, no support for POP3/IMAP/SMTP.
    The Office apps want you to create an account.

    Just let me have the apps without all the fucking caveats, I'm already licensed for Office/Outlook/Visio/Project on multiple systems and shouldn't have to jump through these hurdles!

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    1. Re:Not Great by Quarters · · Score: 2

      This isn't about the OWA app. It's a full Outlook app. Actually, it's just the phenomenal Acompli email client rebranded, as Microsoft bought Acompli about six months ago. OWA is bad, as you have stated, but you're not looking at the correct (new) app.

    2. Re:Not Great by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      I'll go back and look in the package, both are Microsoft so go figure. More confusion.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    3. Re:Not Great by Holi · · Score: 1

      Not really, one is called OWA for Android the other is Microsoft Outlook Preview. Guess which one this article is about.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    4. Re:Not Great by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      unless it's bundled in the office suite it's not there, only OWA https://play.google.com/store/... As I indicated I'll go back and look again but the Office package for Android wants you to create a fucking account to use it. So it's back to the mantra of tying you to another fucking service account, which is not what I want to begin with. Microsoft should me talk to Exchange, IMAP, SMTP and POP3 like other Android mail clients without all the bullshit.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    5. Re:Not Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes it is, its linked in the summary.........
      https://play.google.com/store/...

    6. Re:Not Great by Quarters · · Score: 1

      There is no Office suite bundle. Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, and OneNote are all separate downloads on the Google Play store.

    7. Re: Not Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just checked myself and can't see all of them maybe the play store is blocking them or all the updates aren't there yet?

  30. Re:MSFT ON BSD! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    You mean we should say GNU/Android?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  31. Re:MSFT ON BSD! by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

    I bet you were a hit at parties in the late 80s when it came time to debate the relative merits of Captains Picard and Kirk. ;-)

    Seriously, though, you have a point.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  32. The same efficiency penalty as my desktop! by jlv · · Score: 1

    The pitch is simple: Outlook will let you manage your work and personal email on your phone and tablet as efficiently as you do on your computer.

    I don't think I want to take that same performance hit on my phone and tablet!

  33. my IT dept says: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yesterday Microsoft released a new application in the Apple and Android
    stores: "Outlook for iOS" and "Microsoft Outlook Preview".

    At this time, we STRONGLY advise you NOT to use this application, which we
    have already blocked on the central mail server.

    This application does not directly connect to our mail server. Instead, it
    routes your entire mail traffic over a group of proxy servers in the USA.
    This means that your login information (username & password) as well as
    other mail data are temporarily stored on these proxy servers. This action
    is described in the application's privacy guidelines, but they failed to
    explicitly inform you of this when you are configuring your mail account.

    If you have already installed this "app" and configured your mail account,
    please delete this "app" and change your password:
    [retracted]

    Additional information about this problem can be found under the following
    link:

    https://blog.winkelmeyer.com/2015/01/warning-microsofts-outlook-app-for-ios-
    breaks-your-company-security/

    1. Re:my IT dept says: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Additional information about this problem can be found under the following
      link:

      https://blog.winkelmeyer.com/2015/01/warning-microsofts-outlook-app-for-ios-
      breaks-your-company-security/

      I can't get to that link. It doesn't seem to work. Does it work for anyone else?

    2. Re: my IT dept says: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insiders call that "slashdotted"

    3. Re: my IT dept says: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insiders call that "slashdotted"

      I see what you did there.

  34. Re:MSFT ON BSD! by jlv · · Score: 1

    Mod this up, please!

  35. old Accompli app reskinned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The IT shop at my company has blocked the new Outlook app's access to our Exchange ActiveSync infrastructure while they suss out the security implications. Apparently the app caches your credentials which is a no-no. More here: https://blog.winkelmeyer.com/2015/01/warning-microsofts-outlook-app-for-ios-breaks-your-company-security/

    1. Re:old Accompli app reskinned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can we block access to just this one app on our Exchange servers? Inquiring minds want to know!!!

  36. People *want* MS vendor lock-in? by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    People actually want their information stored in Microsoft's proprietary format? I thought that was something done out of ignorance, or because you felt forced to do so.

    For me, Microsoft's proprietary formats have been a nightmare. I am glad to be rid of them.

    1. Re:People *want* MS vendor lock-in? by Yosho · · Score: 2

      People actually want their information stored in Microsoft's proprietary format? I thought that was something done out of ignorance, or because you felt forced to do so.

      No, and yes, that's right. I don't know that anybody has said, "Sweet, I love Outlook!" Rather, you use Outlook because you work for somewhere that uses an MS Exchange e-mail server whether you like it or not.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
  37. and they store your corp passwords in their cloud? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Awesome... that password I just gave the outlook app? its been stored in the cloud..

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/01/30/dev_finds_bleak_security_outlook_for_ios_app/

  38. Microsoft's strength - business software. by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    I'm no Microsoft fan, but for years I've been questioning their insistence on competing in "consumer" level stuff. Bing, tablets, phones - none are market leaders - they are too little too late. These non-business products are simply a distraction from Microsoft's core competencies.

    Their strength has been, and will always be, business. Their software is cheap-ish, and works well enough in those spaces. Sure, sharepoint is a turd, and there isn't a problem that can't be solved badly by excel and access - but businesses like that stuff.

    There is no shame with taking billions of business dollars to the bank.

  39. Meaning of "won"... by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

    "Linux has won" means that Microsoft has lost the ability to force you to use Windows - just because their apps required it. Linux doesn't need to be on a majority of desktops to have won in that sense. What has been "won" is your ability to use Linux without having to lose certain important functionality that was locked up in Microsoft monopolies.

    --
    Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    1. Re:Meaning of "won"... by war4peace · · Score: 1

      I might have missed the memo which enumerated all those thousands of mainstream games available for Linux starting day 1. Or the ability to use all Radeon-based GPUs at their full potential under Linux. Or SLI-/Crossfire-enabled video setups. Or the total lack of need to drop to terminal while using Linux on a day-to-day basis.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    2. Re:Meaning of "won"... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      'Linux' b.k.a. Android is one of the winners in the tablet and phone space - you do not need the capability to run Windows Phone apps on it. That's the Linux that Microsoft is developing Outlook for. On a desktop, Linux is nowhere near being a winner, and once Windows 10 is out, may never be, unless Microsoft gets another Ballmer like CEO who creates a longer living Windows 8. Or unless a whole bunch of hybrid devices based on ARM, rather than x64 CPUs, and running Android instead of Windows come into the market

  40. Linux vs Android by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Well, when people talk of Linux, they typically mean the Linux distros run on PCs or laptops - Ubuntu, Mint, Debian, Fedora, Mandriva, PCLinuxOS, blah blah blah. If they're talking about Google's custom made Linux for tablets or phones, they call it Android.

    It does make a difference, given that apps that one may normally run on, say Mint, such as LibreOffice, won't run on Android, unless specifically ported to that platform. Like a sibling post mentioned above, Android has its own userspace that's not compatible w/ GNU. Similarly, or rather more importantly, apps written for Android, such as in this case Outlook, won't run on your laptop w/ Mint on it. The only Linux that may run it is Google's own ChromeOS. It's just like one can't run OS-X apps on PCBSD.

    1. Re:Linux vs Android by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      You are now talking about the userspace and not the kernel (Linux). Even desktop Linux distros are not fully userspace-compatible with each other.

    2. Re:Linux vs Android by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Who is saying that including "GNU" makes a Linux installation "real"? There are many kinds of software stacks built upon Linux. Besides, a typical PC Linux distro is comprised of many, many other pieces than just the kernel and GNU software.

  41. Limited to Office365 by bobdehnhardt · · Score: 1

    The biggest downside (for me, at least) is that it's limited to accounts running on Office365 - if your company hasn't migrated, the app will not connect to your Exchange server.

    1. Re:Limited to Office365 by Murrdox · · Score: 1

      This isn't true. You're able to connect to the app on Exchange normally. This is a separate app from the 365 application. I was able to download it and authenticate to my company's Exchange without any issues and we do not have a 365 business license. For us, the issue is security as this is another avenue to access an employee's email which can be exploited.

  42. Re:MSFT ON BSD! by Ogi_UnixNut · · Score: 1

    Paaah, real nerds didn't get invited to parties :-) We just hung out on online chat for our entire lives, arguing! :-P

    Well, the result of this particular multi-year long argument was that "GNU" was dropped, and everyone (bar RMS) called it "Linux".

    I was always in the "GNU/Linux" camp, because the two projects, while complimentary, were not bound for eternity. You could just as easily have GNU/Hurd or GNU/kBSD, or as we have now, "Android/Linux".

    It is funny that it has taken this many years for the lack of distinction of what exactly people think "Linux" is to rear its head. The main argument of the opposing camp was that "Everyone knows what Linux is, no need to make it longer with GNU in front".

    As for Picard vs Kirk, I think resurrecting one ancient flamewar is enough for today :-)

  43. Re:MSFT ON BSD! by Ogi_UnixNut · · Score: 1

    Oh, and looky here, wiki has an article about it:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G...

  44. Re:MSFT ON BSD! by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

    The reply is to a Linus quote, and he would never have said GNU/Linux, he would just mean Linux, which Android is in spades.

    --
    - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  45. JAVA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's really a win for DalJava.

  46. How can we block this app? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been directed by my CIO to block this app immediately. We have already sent out company-wide notifications that this app is prohibited. How can we block access to this in our Exchange environment? We already allow access via ActiveSync to iOS, Android, BlackBerry and Windows devices. We will be implementing BES12 in the next few months which should be able to block access to it.

    Going forward we will monitor changes of this app to see if Microsoft can pull their head out of their ass. The design of this app is unacceptable right now. They literally break every company's security when it comes to blocking access to 3rd party storage, off side email storage, and storage of account credentials. I can't imagine that they consulted with any Fortune 500 companies either during design or testing.

    1. Re:How can we block this app? by acoustix · · Score: 1

      To block with activesync: "New-ActiveSyncDeviceAccessRule –QueryString 'Outlook for iOS and Android' –Characteristic DeviceModel –AccessLevel Block"

      To quarantine: "New-ActiveSyncDeviceAccessRule –QueryString 'Outlook for iOS and Android' –Characteristic DeviceModel –AccessLevel Quarantine"

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson