Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Is There a Modern IP Webcam That Lets the User Control the Output?

First time accepted submitter Tronster writes Owners of a local shop have a menu that changes daily and wanted an IP webcam to update an image on their web-site. After a frustrating 2 hours of a "Hikvision" refusing to behave, I threw in the towel and looked for a better camera to recommend. The biggest issue today is that the new webcams that come out don't support FTP, they all support sending images/video direct to a "private cloud" (e.g., Simplicam, Dropcam, etc...). Google has been no help; all the sites are either outdated in terms of ranking or the most recent ones recommend a Foscam. They previously tried one of these and it's image quality was too poor. While security systems and home automation has been discussed recently, I haven't found any recent discussions on webcams that give a user control of where the content is sent. Does anyone in the Slashdot community have recommendations, reputable sites that are up-to-date in rankings, and/or hacks to have control over some of these newer cameras?

263 comments

  1. Really? by jawtheshark · · Score: 5, Insightful
    First of all, why not simply upload a PDF with the new menu every day? That is easy, and scriptable. (For example, copy finished menu in any format in a folder. This folder is polled occasionaly for new content, if new content is there, eventually convert (doc, docx, odt to pdf), and upload to FTP server. Done.)

    Second, you could just take a stock webcam, attach it to an RPi, let it make a picture, let's say every 15 minutes and upload it to the desired FTP server. 100% scriptable.

    Personally, I think this idea is ripe for abuse. Somebody is going to draw penises on the menu and it will be there on the site for all to see. Overthink your workflow instead of doing this.

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    1. Re:Really? by gatkinso · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, I was going to draw breasts. Clearly your level of perversion is of a far baser nature than mine.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    2. Re:Really? by frisket · · Score: 2

      Even better, have them type in the menu to whatever they use to create their PDF (presumably they do actually print menus to give to diners :-) but then turn that input into HTML and put it on the web.

      In any case, WTF do restaurants insist on publishing their menus as poxy goddessawful PDFs anyway? This is just pandering to the designer's pitiful little ego. If you want me to come dine, give me something I can READ, damn you.

    3. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You do realize that they are talking probably about chalk-on-a-board menus right? I'm sure the poster would have been smart enough to upload a PDF if there was any to begin with.

    4. Re:Really? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, I'm going to draw breasts.

      ( . )( . )

    5. Re:Really? by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 2

      I was going to say he had a harder view of reality... I too would vote for titties. In fact, depending on camera location and angle they might arrange for some lady to flash the camera every once and awhile*!
      *plausible deniability not included

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    6. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to suggest a raspberry pi as well. The RPi camera seems to have pretty good resolution although I've only taken one or two pictures with it.

    7. Re:Really? by Immerman · · Score: 3

      Actually the conversion between a free-form pagesetting layout and HTML is non-trivial - unless the printed menu is utterly simplistic there's likely to be a fair amount of work necessary to convert it to a non-hideous HTML document. So, since HTML is unacceptable due to increased costs your options are basically a bitmapped image, or something vector-based that can be zoomed. Which basically means either PDF or SVG, and an awful lot of software doesn't have decent SVG exporting, while there are plugins that allow any program to print to PDF, assuming they don't support exporting PDF natively.

      Moreover, the summary specifically says "shop", not restraunt. So there's a fair chance that their menu is in fact hand-drawn on a black/whiteboard without any printed copies. I know lots of bars and cafes that do that - printing out new menus every day wastes a LOT of paper.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    8. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's "once in a while", friend. You're welcome.

    9. Re:Really? by gatkinso · · Score: 4, Funny

      That is the breast post I have seen in a long time.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    10. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those look more like moobs than breasts. Try ( o Y o )

    11. Re:Really? by Tronster · · Score: 4, Informative

      First of all, why not simply upload a PDF with the new menu every day?...

      ...another task is the exact situation they want to avoid and see technology as a solution.

      For those comments about defacing; it's not a small menu off to the side, or in front of the shop, it's a 6 foot tall menu board in the main area (it's an ice-cream shop) which is already updated daily (or a few times a day if they run out of a flavor and cross over to their next batch, etc...) Once a camera is in place, showing the menu online is something they just don't have to worry about any more - updating the menu board updates its on the web.

    12. Re: Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Today's special : Pepperoni Nipples

    13. Re:Really? by jafiwam · · Score: 2

      This situation is what Facebook is for.

      Make a bunch of links in the site, state, "Click for daily specials" and link to Facebook.

      And, for you whankers that are going to claim "I don't use Facebook", a business can make it so the profile is completely public so no account is needed.

    14. Re: Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Using FB without an account is still using FB.

    15. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or they can do what the questioner wanted and have it automatically update via camera and not have to fart about with Facebook .

    16. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a viewer still has to enable facebook scripts...

      F FB.

    17. Re:Really? by melchoir55 · · Score: 1

      The pdf (IMO it shouldn't even do pdf, but should create an html page.) should be an automatic result of wherever they update their menu. There should be no extra steps from their point of view. If you mean the extra step of having to create the workflow process which does it, you're doing that anyway by writing crazy ad-hoc webcam software.

    18. Re:Really? by jandrese · · Score: 1

      How complicated are you making these menus? Is it more than Entree Name, Description, and Price? Seems like exactly the sort of thing that you could whip up in 10 minutes with a little HTML generation and a style sheet. You can add some graphics and play with the fonts to pretty it up, but ultimately a menu is just a tabulated list--something HTML was designed from the start to display.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    19. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a tabulated list--something HTML was designed from the start to display.

      Actually, HTML didn't have any support for tables initially. IIRC, the table tag didn't officially become part of HTML until HTML 3.2 in the mid-90s sometime....

    20. Re:Really? by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Right - On most menu's its the graphics, borders, headers, fonts, etc. that cause problems with HMTL export. Could you position them within an HTML table? Sure, sort of, up to a point But that requires that you design your menu based on the limitations of HTML - and why the %$#@! would you want to do that for anything that wasn't being designed primarily for the web? It's *painful*, straight page-setting software is *far* more flexible. And does your page-setting program offer an HTML export function that doesn't suck? Umm, probably not - at best it probably requires you to limit yourself to the tiny subset of HTML-friendly layout tools.

      Meanwhile a "bad" export is likely to be little better than a bulleted list. informationally complete perhaps, but absolutely horrible as a piece of advertising material to be posted on your website for the world to see. After all the point of posting your menu online is not just as a convenience for your regulars, but to attract new customers as well. And a bad HTML export screams "we're a bunch of lazy schmucks who can't even be bothered to post a menu that conveys the atmosphere and personae we try to have our establishment project."

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    21. Re:Really? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      And, for you whankers that are going to claim "I don't use Facebook", a business can make it so the profile is completely public so no account is needed.

      Wankers isn't spelled with a H. Also, stop trying to be logical with hipsters, if they used facebook's public profiles it would be too mainstream for them.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    22. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to the pdf route which screams "we're a bunch of jumped up twats that care more about making sure you see our pretty menu than actually informing you of what we fucking serve".

    23. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sooo, you're proposing they install some sort of giant digitized chalk board instead? Perhaps you've simply somehow missed the whole point: The menu is written by hand on a giant board. There is no automatic result of where they update their menu, that's what the webcam IS FOR.

    24. Re:Really? by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 1

      How does Facebook make this any better than having it listed on a website? Sure you can click a link to go to another website, or you can just show it inline as an image on the page the is currently being viewed. Is anyone really going to want to spam themselves by having the daily menu coming up in their Facebook feed everyday?

    25. Re:Really? by rpresser · · Score: 1

      Your credibility was completely lost when you typed menu's.

    26. Re:Really? by Tronster · · Score: 1

      This is a good idea; they actually do this already. They want to take it to the next level... hence a Slashdot question. 8)

    27. Re:Really? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      The simple (and reasonably inexpensive) thing to do here would be to have a display system, with a large LCD TV. Then update the two (LCD and site) from the same data. It's not perfect, but will be just as 'useable' by the shop.

      There are three local bars using this approach for their beers, and a hamburger shop (which has a decidedly static menu). One of the bars went to this approach (from multiple 5'x5' chalk boards on multiple floors) because they had too many beers which changed entirely too often - they'd often be altering the board several times an evening.

      (That said, I prefer the chalkboard, but this does address the irritation of the problem you have.)

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    28. Re:Really? by aiht · · Score: 1

      Your credibility was completely lost when you typed menu's.

      Given the general high quality writing of the post, I think Immerman knows full well that plurals don't usually require apostrophes.
      I'm guessing that you are not aware of the usage where certain words ending in vowels have an added apostrophe to emphasise that the "s" isn't part of the root word.
      It's rarely used for words these days, but is still common for symbols and non-word constructions ("count the &'s", "mind your P's and Q's").

      As an example of why this can still be very useful for words, though: there are two pages on Wikipedia about people named "Peni".
      How would you refer to both of them as a group?

    29. Re:Really? by Locutus · · Score: 1

      what about a low end( by todays standard ) digital camera like a Cannon which can have installed new firmware on the SD card for timed pictures and use one of those wifi enabled SD cards?

      CHDK is the firmware:
      http://lifehacker.com/387380/turn-your-point-and-shoot-into-a-super-camera

      SD WiFi card(Eyefi):
      http://www.eyefi.com/

      if EyeFi won't let you send to your own web server then just put a script on your web server to go get the latest picture from the EyeFi site.

      That should cover it except for some kind of mount which would have to hang from the ceiling and could have a standard tripod screw mount on it. Heck, CDHK probably lets you flip the picture so you can just suspend a tripod from the ceiling with the camera attached. You'll also want to find a compatible Cannon camera which can take external power.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    30. Re:Really? by Bugamn · · Score: 1

      I guess they must be a bunch of dicks.

    31. Re:Really? by CaptQuark · · Score: 1

      The extra apostrophe actually belongs to the "its" that follows. He just typed it too early.

      ~~

    32. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right - On most menu's its the graphics, borders, headers, fonts, etc. that cause problems with HMTL export.

      How do they taste?

      If I ordered something from a menu that's just an UL (unordered list) with a bunch of LI (list items), would I be able to taste the difference?

      Somehow, I get the feeling that the money spent on a graphical designer to design graphics, borders, headers and fonts, etc, would be better spent on a chef.

    33. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From my comment above:

      Now, that still doesn't explain why Mr./Ms. Restaurant manager can't type it up after the chef writes it on the chalkboard so it can be put online. Seems like a personnel problem more than a technology problem. The owner needs to give management a daily task or find new management that can type and do their job, daily!

      Sorry, even if it changes a few times a day, it doesn't need to change online immediately, but it should be some person's task to do it. Do they deliver? Do they do online pre-orders? With ice cream being the product, I would think neither, so why does the website have to change immediately? Again, this is a personnel issue, either management/owner is crazy or lazy.

    34. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A local pizza place (with a menu that doesn't change too often) offers their menu on the website, but also allows you to download two PDF versions of it. One is just like the menu they give you at the restaurant, with a nice design and photographs of the food and what now, in black background with white letters and a nice little red/white stripe going around the page and oh the design. The other is what they call "printer friendly", which is just the names of the pizzas (because it's that kind of place), the ingredients/description and the prices, black text on white background, no pictures and very little else except for their logo and a few other minor details, all black on white.

    35. Re: Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys, lame. Just answer the question. It's reflective of technology which won't allow for enough personal control. Modern webcams are a pain in the ass, kind of like you guys.

      For the poster, try python and opencv, there's plenty of example code out there that will let you save a frame to file.

    36. Re:Really? by Tronster · · Score: 1

      The ice-cream shop is small, "mom and pop" shop; the owner is the manager.
      Your inference is off, they are not crazy and most definitely not lazy; in fact the opposite which is why they are pursuing this endeavor.

    37. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How often is the board partially obstructed?

      I mean if the picture on the internet is ~~~~~~~ ice cream ~~~~~~ ed ice cream and ~~~~~~~~kle ice cream. (where ~~~~~~~~ is some patron/workers body) its not going to help anyone.

    38. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These will do it.
      They can store images internally or on a server via FTP (assuming that is what you want). They can also do even more, obviously. They are even optionally weather-proof.
      https://pro.sony.com/bbsc/ssr/cat-camerasptz/cat-standarddefinition/

      On the other hand, maybe you could have a digital menu instead and have the update happen on a computer instead of with chalk (or white board or whatever). Then you can have the document displayed on the digital display and the web site at the same time. You could also incorporate various innovations later to this (pictures of the ice cream scoops, video advertisements of products, etc).

    39. Re:Really? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that they should rework their entire business to make it easier for their web site. Nevermind the fact that they have these menus printed and that's the primary concern. The printed work is already done in a PDF export and they're either posting that as-is or running it through an optimizer to reduce the file size.

      Even if it's primarily tabular work, you are dealing with a physical page. One entry or deletion from the menu will affect the positioning of everything else if you want the finished page to look "filled in" and proportionally laid out. That's a more artistic than technical concern and much easier with the likes of Adobe Illustrator than a Perl script.

    40. Re:Really? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      No, it screams that they've already done the work to make their printed menu. Just posting that file as is or size-reduced is the simplest option with the least amount of work.

    41. Re: Really? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Then the site developer can use Facebook's Graph API to pull the recent post back into the site's content, while the restaurant owner gets to benefit from Facebook's free mobile client to post the photos with.

      Yes, even that is "using FB" but there comes a point that you just have to get over yourself.

    42. Re:Really? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Because taking a picture and posting it to a web site is actually a lot more technically complicated for a lot of people compared to using the FB app on their phones.

      Then again, I would script their site to make their web site pull that data back onto their own web site. There's no reason a business should put more important information on FB than on their own web site.

    43. Re:Really? by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the defense, it's nice to see that not everybody equates carelessness and idiocy. I certainly like your explanation better than "I have an itchy apostrophe finger that likes to mess with things when I'm not paying close enough attention"

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    44. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saved this comment off to "read" it later.

    45. Re: Really? by Meski · · Score: 1

      Reminds me - at one point I was going down to the local, and asked colleagues what they were after, on requested a carton of Nippy's Apple Juice, when I got there, I asked for Appy's Nipple Juice. Red face time.

    46. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes that would increase the restaurants turnover untold

    47. Re: Really? by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      I take it that Appy was not 'appy with your request?

    48. Re: Really? by Meski · · Score: 1

      Ladies behind the counter weren't. Although it was long ago enough that it did get laughed off.

  2. Is it too hard... by Lordfly · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ..to snap a photo of the menu with their smart phone and upload it to a website every day? Most restaurants around here do that.

    --
    hookers and grits.
    1. Re:Is it too hard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iSpy.

      Google it, I bet you can get it to do what you want with nearly any camera. Its Freeware, might be opensouce.

    2. Re:Is it too hard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heck, post the photo to Twitter, and you can embed your latest one in your website.

    3. Re:Is it too hard... by Megane · · Score: 5, Funny

      They should put the menu on a wooden table, take a picture with a film camera, scan the photograph on a flatbed scanner, then post that picture on their website.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    4. Re:Is it too hard... by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      That is the most painful web-related thing I've ever had to read.

    5. Re: Is it too hard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, last step is kinda futuristic. The Internet will never have enough user base to matter. Best thing is to print the image after you scan it and mail it to people overnight.

    6. Re:Is it too hard... by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 4, Funny

      The ' obligatory ' XKCD http://xkcd.com/763/

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    7. Re:Is it too hard... by Tronster · · Score: 1

      You're right, it's not too difficult to take a photo and upload it everyday.
      What's easier than that? Having to take no photo or upload at all because it's all happening automatically.

    8. Re: Is it too hard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fail. You left out several steps:

      - print the scan using a dot-matrix printer with a dried-out ribbon;
      - fax it to a friend;
      - have your friend send it back, using a mojo (call the 1970s and ask for a couple);
      - ask your 7-year-old niece to render an interpretation of it with the crayon set you gave her for her birthday;
      - scan it again;
      - post it on a website with seizure-inducing flash animations rendered in retina-burning neons;
      - profit!

    9. Re:Is it too hard... by mrex · · Score: 1

      Lets do the math.

      Snapping a photo, saving it off, uploading it, etc. Lets assume the person is really efficient, and figure 5 minutes per day, every day.

      Thanks to xkcd, I already know that's six full days every five years. And not workdays, full 24 hour days! In other words, that's more than 26 hours of staff time each year for the lifetime of your restaurant. Since the job will require administrative access to the website, it'll need to be performed by someone with some responsibility, so lets figure $15.00/hr. Now you're right around $500 a year, and that's if it only takes five minutes a day.

      So yes, it is too hard. Several daily manual steps that cost your business $500 each year, which could be eliminated with a one time investment in $100 of technology.

    10. Re:Is it too hard... by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      The ' obligatory ' XKCD http://xkcd.com/763/

      Thanks for posting that. I thought everyone had overlooked that step... 8-)

    11. Re: Is it too hard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir , are high on dog feces

  3. Motion by dargaud · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Use any webcam or USB connected camera and 'motion' a Linux FOSS tool that lets you program picture taking any which way you want.

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
    1. Re:Motion by anagama · · Score: 2

      Came here to suggest this. Besides doing a static image, you can also use it as a motion detector so that at night, if there is a break-in, there's a chance of getting a snapshot of the robbers.

      Here's a link: http://www.lavrsen.dk/foswiki/...

      This looks interesting: https://medium.com/@Cvrsor/how...

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    2. Re:Motion by NEDHead · · Score: 1

      Seriously? What are the chances a thief is going to stand next to the menu board to see what yesterday's dinner special was?

    3. Re:Motion by anagama · · Score: 1

      re-aim the camera at closing time to aim at the door. What's so hard about that?

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    4. Re:Motion by Trogre · · Score: 1

      At some point down the track, someone will forget to do it. That's what.

      Have two cameras.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    5. Re:Motion by NEDHead · · Score: 1

      I really need to remember to use my "HUMOR" hashtag

    6. Re:Motion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need a permit to install a permanent camera (surveillance).

    7. Re:Motion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most computers will hold 2-3 of the popular video capture boards. They are all BrookTree chips sets, BT-848 to BT-878 last I looked.

      I buy WinTV-GO cards from overstock.com for $15 each and they work great. The cameras are another matter, but, used indoors with plenty of light, should be doable for $50-75 or so.

    8. Re:Motion by DriveDog · · Score: 1

      Gee whiz. Just put the menu on the inside of the door.

  4. Why even use a webcam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It will just look bad an unprofessional. Write the menu on a computer, if you need photos use a digital camera!

    1. Re:Why even use a webcam? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 3, Informative

      If I were to guess, the menu changes daily and is written on something like a chalkboard or whiteboard. They could print it, but the handwriting gives it a homestyle artistic "flare" that the restaurant wants to maintain:

      My thought then would be something like this: Get a tablet or smartphone with a wacom stylus (e.g. Galaxy Note 10) and a big TV (say 55", get a used one on CL for about $400 or so.)

      Hand write the menu on the tablet (you can use different color writing and background as you desire) and save the image file to a place that uploads it to a computer that is connected to the TV at the restaurant (which is in portrait orientation) and to the website.

      Has an added benefit of making it easily readable by the visually impaired, and it looks neat (you can also have it mounted up high somewhere, which might be impractical for a chalkboard/whiteboard.)

      I'd imagine you could spend less than $800 on this total setup.

    2. Re:Why even use a webcam? by Xolotl · · Score: 2

      Which is $800 more than the existing chalkboard, requires power, and will fail/have to be replaced within a few years. And chalkboards can be quite high up, all you need is a stepladder or a chair once a day.

    3. Re:Why even use a webcam? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      They can't take a photo of the chalkboard and post it? This seems like a problem from the 90's.

    4. Re:Why even use a webcam? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Umm...assuming 8 hours a day of running time, a TV like that would cost about $30 per year in electricity if it was a really shitty one. The average ones are about $20 a year, and the LED backlit ones would be about $13 a year. The computer could be either less or more, depending on chosen components.

      Anyways the guy is already talking about spending money, and already bought a hikvision camera, which start at around $175 for JUST the camera, not even including the POE equipment and servers that it will send images to. I really doubt $800 is a big deal for such a project.

      This is also a similar setup to what I've seen other restaurants do (although without the tablet, they use something like MS paint with a mouse, which can work well if you're good at it.)

      Not only that but it isn't likely to fail. I've owned all of about 8 different LCD based TV's over the last decade, and not one of them has failed. Granted I've sold most of them, but the oldest one I have is 9 years old and still works fine.

    5. Re:Why even use a webcam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      flare != flair

    6. Re:Why even use a webcam? by Xolotl · · Score: 1

      Fair enough.

    7. Re:Why even use a webcam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This.. completely ignores 99% of the problems associated with using TV's as Menu's in restaurants.

      - Consumer TV's are not rated to be on for 12+ hours at a time (who runs a restaurant that's only open 8 hours!?) Many businesses position their menu's to be visible from outside the premise, This will LIKELY mean the unit is left on for extreme hours )many even leaving it on 24/7, though this is going to be highly dependant on the business.
      - Consumer units do not have a warranty that covers commercial use. Any repairs / faults will not be covered. (this is generally pretty lax; if you don't TELL the place you bought it from what it was for, most won't ask. If the use is not covered by the warranty, it becomes a tricky issue for accounting these days.
      - Digital Signage can lead to copyright problems (drawing a copyrighted character is a derivative work, copy/pasting becomes questionable)
      - Service time may be terrible depending on the location
      - Wall mounting a TV may be a pain in the ass (Chalk boards are mounted at the extreme edges/corners; tv's are mounted in a small center point)
      - Any form of electronics (especially a consumer TV mounted close to a ceiling) can pose an additional fire risk; Though the chance of this is low these days, many insurance companies will likely look down on the addition of a TV. (this does not even try to look at the fact that most cheap IP cameras are constructed TERRIBLY and likely pose a HIGHER fire risk.. but the insurance industry views them as a "good thing to have" and overlooks this.. anyways..)

      This doesn't even begin to cover the "SHOULD a business use a TV as a sign?" issue. Personally, I would not be attending a maw-and-paw diner after they put a TV up on the wall. The Chalkboard/Whiteboard adds a nice personal touch.

      ALL this said; taking a picture of the board and putting it up online seems like the best idea to me. Though I know a lot of small businesses that open with one staff member, and this is going to further increase the workload of one person. Automating this with a webcam should be pretty simple.

      OP: pick up a raspberry pi with a camera add-on, put it in a case, and script away. Should take less than a few hours to get installed + totally working; and cost $200 (if you REALLY go all out with features + a nice case / etc)

    8. Re:Why even use a webcam? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Photography was invented in the early 1800's, the blackboard was invented earlier than that and the first postal service dates from around 4415 years ago.

      So this seems more like a problem for the 1800's, unless you were talking about posting the photo on the line.

    9. Re:Why even use a webcam? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Flair, as in:

      Joanna: You know what, Stan, if you want me to wear 37 pieces of flair, like your pretty boy over there, Brian, why don't you just make the minimum 37 pieces of flair?
      Stan, Chotchkie's Manager: Well, I thought I remembered you saying that you wanted to express yourself.
      Joanna: Yeah. You know what, yeah, I do. I do want to express myself, okay. And I don't need 37 pieces of flair to do it.
      [flips off Stan]

    10. Re:Why even use a webcam? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Surely the best idea is to continue to use the marker board, and type the freaking menu into the website. That way it will be easy to read for everyone, especially those with poor vision (through larger fonts), no vision (through screen readers), or using mobile devices (probably the most likely device someone would use for finding a restaurant, actually. Definitely the most likely device someone would use from within the restaurant if they don't have a good view of the board).

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    11. Re:Why even use a webcam? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      They could print it, but the handwriting gives it a homestyle artistic "flare" that the restaurant wants to maintain:

      "Flare" vs. "flair".

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    12. Re:Why even use a webcam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gigantic TVs in a restaurant that is not a sports bar are *hideous*. This is a horrible idea! Please nobody do this! :-o

    13. Re:Why even use a webcam? by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      This takes time and is prone to forgetting. It also requires keyboard space somewhere unlikely to wind up covered with product. That counter space is _expensive_, every foot not in use for real service is lost to profit.

    14. Re:Why even use a webcam? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 2

      Consumer TV's are not rated to be on for 12+ hours at a time

      And yet it will work fine anyways. Remember that 9 year old LCD TV I mentioned? Yeah well it's been on practically 24/7, and it was a no-name generic bought refurbished at best buy.

      - Digital Signage can lead to copyright problems (drawing a copyrighted character is a derivative work, copy/pasting becomes questionable)

      The exact same thing applies to a chalk board. Honestly it sounds like you're arguing just to argue.

      You're just hair splitter. Off with ya.

    15. Re:Why even use a webcam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Thank you for handling that for me. My eyelid was twitching.

    16. Re:Why even use a webcam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consumer TV's are not rated to be on for 12+ hours at a time

      And yet it will work fine anyways. Remember that 9 year old LCD TV I mentioned? Yeah well it's been on practically 24/7, and it was a no-name generic bought refurbished at best buy.

      ...the other poster is right. It will burn out the LCD TV. I had a similar era, *brand name* TV that I pressed into service as a wall-mounted business platform dashboard in the office. It had image persistence within a month and died in under a year.

      One good anecdote deserves another.

    17. Re:Why even use a webcam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I completely agree, I will say it's better than the "use a SmartBoard!" idea some other sperglord tendered.

    18. Re:Why even use a webcam? by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to mention how well (or how poorly) lcds work in bright sunlight...

    19. Re: Why even use a webcam? by jd2112 · · Score: 1

      Flare if you put J.J. Abrams in charge of the web site.

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    20. Re: Why even use a webcam? by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      Or me. Because I have my matches right here.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    21. Re:Why even use a webcam? by UnderCoverPenguin · · Score: 1

      Personally, I would not be attending a maw-and-paw diner

      Neither would I, but my cats would probably love it.

      --
      Don't try to out wierd me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you, free with my breakfast cereal. --Zaphod Beeblebr
  5. Because by koan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You're looking for a "webcam", stop looking for a "webcam" and you will find what you want.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    1. Re:Because by Immerman · · Score: 1

      This, absolutley this, I'd mod you up if I had the points. A webcam is specifically designed for streaming video, usually at horrible low resolution that would make a menu unreadable.

      What the questioner really wants is just an easy way to snap a single photo with a decent digital camera and upload it to the website, preferably without requiring any technical knowledge on the part of the photographer. I'm sure there's a smartphone app to do that, probably several.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    2. Re:Because by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're looking for a "webcam", stop looking for a "webcam" and you will find what you want.

      Bingo. These festures are easily found on most modern IP security cameras. And the bonus is they can be configured remotely after initial setup. Mobotix is the high end brand, Axis is high quality....and lower end brands may fit the bill as well.

    3. Re:Because by Tronster · · Score: 1

      Immerman: If you know of an App, please pass on the word. The key is that it needs to be triggered if there is motion (when the board is updated).

      koan: I thought of a iPhone or Android that could do the trick but would need to find a piece of software that can activate with motion, and FTP the image up to a site. Webcams are essentially build for this, with both video and images. The problem is, the older ones have horrible resolution. The newer webcams look great (720p, 1080p, good sensors, etc...) but are all working on a model where you have to pay to access the feed from their "private cloud". So I hear you say "webcam" is the problem... great I agree... but what do you offer as a solution?

    4. Re:Because by Tronster · · Score: 1

      This is fantastic; hadn't come across Mobotix or Axis.
      Will check them out. Thank you.

    5. Re:Because by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Mobotix has its own web server right on the camera. I'm sure others do but I'm not familiar. Mobotix is a awesome camera, great quality, but $$$$$$$.

    6. Re:Because by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel that you have not explained one critical point -- Why does it need be triggered by motion? Do we have to assume that you go to extraordinary technical lengths, to have a motion activated (presumably time-delayed, to account for the person updating the menu to finish, and then also able to recognize that there isn't a squirrel in the photo moving, or a person coming by to look at the menu, etc....), but that the people updating the menu are so technically incompentant that they cannot even pickup a cell phone and press a single button?

    7. Re:Because by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      Try VivoTek as well, they make some nice 5MP units with good optical zoom - meaning you can mount the camera a good distance away and zoom into the menu board.

      We used to run mobotix exclusively, and their cameras are now in the low to mid-range in performance, but still high-end in price.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    8. Re: Because by LocalH · · Score: 1

      Motion detection is a horrible idea. It just needs to be set to snap pics as often as they normally change the menu (or have it be triggered manually in a simple, push-button fashion).

      --
      FC Closer
    9. Re:Because by Tronster · · Score: 1

      That is a good question...
      It doesn't have to be trigger by motion; that is just a likely scenario when the menu board is updated. It could also upload a new photo every so many minutes/hours ... the trick would be to pick an interval that is frequent enough to be up-to-date but not so frequent that they much through their allocated bandwidth for the month from the frequent uploads.

    10. Re:Because by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have to be trigger by motion; that is just a likely scenario when the menu board is updated. It could also upload a new photo every so many minutes/hours ... the trick would be to pick an interval that is frequent enough to be up-to-date but not so frequent that they much through their allocated bandwidth for the month from the frequent uploads.

      Motion is also likely if someone or something gets in the way between the menu board and the camera. Depending on the location of the menu board it may be common or not.

      But even overhead menuboards have the chance someone will have some fun and deliberately trigger it by waving in front of it so the menu is obscured.

      One restaurant I know uses facebook and twitter to do their menu updates - when they update the menuboards, they then tweet and post the change as well so their followers can get notified automatically.

      Might be a simpler solution and makes the social networking account more "active" and up to date.

  6. Pie by CurryCamel · · Score: 3, Informative

    Finally, a proper use case for the Raspberry Pi. And in its natural habitat at that!

    1. Re:Pie by OldGoatDJ · · Score: 1

      Raspberry Pi!! Cheap ( $100), easy, good Raspberry Pi Camera, FTP, scripting, Even can be done with wifi and remote management.

    2. Re:Pie by unrtst · · Score: 5, Informative

      Agreed! However, I've read this far and have not seen anyone actually answer his direct question.

      So: D-Link DCS-930L:
      * about $30
      * wired or wireless network
      * IP camera
      * 640x480 (may be low-ish, but should be enough for a menu if properly framed in the FoV)
      * FTP client support

      If it was me, I'd just have them write the menu twice:
      1. on chalkboard
      2. on a form that updates the webpage (or just in a markdown doc and have that uploaded; or in something else and have them export to pdf and upload; etc)

      They're already having someone write it by hand on a chalkboard whenever it changes. That takes WAY more time than writing by hand on paper, and both take longer than typing.

      If they *really* need the fully automated chalkboard-to-web solution, then the Raspberry Pi is a perfect solution. You could also use any old or new mini pc (zotac zbox; asus eee box; chrombox; etc) + any camera or webcam you want. Install linux and "motion". Have motion upload new images when the image changes, or use a cron job to schedule it (ex. if they turn the lights off at night, you probably don't want motion to upload a black snapshot). You could also combine the two - enable motion during the day and disable it at night via cron but use it to decide when to upload.

      Maybe this is "too much work". As others have pointed out, there's more than one way to skin this cat. Cheapest and most readily available and very simple would be to have them take the picture with their phone and upload it. This could be tweaked an any number of ways as needed. For example:
      a) write a mini app to do this. This would hide the file renaming, ftp settings, etc, and it's just be a button to take a picture and a button to say "ok, upload that". Writing apps is like that is REALLY easy.
      b) save the photos to dropbox or upload to twitter etc. Then, server side, script it to find the most recent when displaying the menu.
      c) Just tell them how and write that on a piece of paper for them to follow: take picture; save it; go into ftp app; select it; rename it to "menu.jpg"; click upload

    3. Re:Pie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The OP is asking the wrong forum.

      Let's reverse the situation: ./ user: "I can't cook pasta with my new electric stove. It always comes out mushy, not al dente".
      The shop/cafe owner: Duh, it's easy, just [insert response typical on any comment in this post]...

      Jokes aside, the mydlink 9xx cameras are great middle ground. HD video, latency is pretty good for live view, works in any browser, and does either ftp or email images -- with or without motion capture. And the mydlink cloud, though no as secure as I'd like, it pretty easy to use.

    4. Re:Pie by CurryCamel · · Score: 1

      Informative? Informative 4??
      I was aiming fror a Troll with positive rating. Or Funny in the worst case.

  7. RasPi + Camera module by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd go with a Raspberry Pi (35$), either with a camera module or a no-infrared module; a small shell script will do, google for it!

    1. Re:RasPi + Camera module by pcjunky · · Score: 1

      You can get 5+ megapixel camera for PI from MCM Electronics for $25.

    2. Re:RasPi + Camera module by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Or they can just use the camera in one of the smartphones that someone in the restaurant already owns?

  8. Sharx by hawkeyeMI · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Sharx brand cameras are expensive (~$280) but have many great capabilities built in, including dumping to a NAS and motion alerts with emailed snapshots. I've run them in some capacity for over five years with no trouble. My only complaint other than price is that the UI is not always very self-explanatory, and they refuse to post PDF manuals on their site, so don't lose the (extensive) paper manual.

    --
    Error 404 - Sig Not Found
    1. Re:Sharx by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

      My only complaint other than price is that the UI is not always very self-explanatory, and they refuse to post PDF manuals on their site, so don't lose the (extensive) paper manual.

      Or, you know, take pictures of it...

  9. Axis Q6034 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Axis,

    Don't buy the cheap shitty ones Q6034 is a nice model that will upload via FTP on a schedule.

  10. RTSP by Elbarfo · · Score: 1

    There are several tools which allow you to put an RTSP stream on a webpage using VLC and other tools. The Hikvision camera you have will support that.

  11. Try this by Karmashock · · Score: 3, Informative

    WB350F

    It is a regular pocket camera that can connect to wifi and email photos. It might work for you. Have the people pick the camera up, take a picture of the menu, press the email button, and then have the website poll the email account every 10 minutes for a picture sent by the address associated with the camera.

    A little messy but I think that is the way to go. It does require people pick the camera up and do that every day. But is that a problem?

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:Try this by Tronster · · Score: 2

      Thank you. May not work as the existing camera mounts are from the ceiling; not easily accessible... still worth checking out; perhaps there is a hack.

    2. Re:Try this by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      The only other option is a high resolution webcam. Any highres webcam is fine. Then you can download some software on to a computer that is connected to the webcam to poll the webcam every 10 minutes or whenever you want it polled... and then upload the picture right to your webserver.

      That would work too.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    3. Re:Try this by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      no problem

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    4. Re:Try this by dkman · · Score: 1

      I have a Panasonic similar to this one
      I was able to figure out the link that would essentially give me the picture the camera sees right now (ie, take a picture mode). Then I wrote a c# program to grab that photo, compare that to the prior image and save it with a time stamp if it was sufficiently different. That "compare" part was never fully fleshed out so I just saved everything. I think I had it going every 15 seconds so it chewed up some disk space. But I digress.

      If you can grab the current picture from the web cam you can roll your own "grab the picture, upload to site" script. Both of those should need credentials, so their are security implications. I believe my cam had it in the URL like an FTP user@host configuration. It also had a PTZ (pan,tilt,zoom) control via web page. So getting the right angle from the mount may be easier with that.

      --
      I refuse to sign
  12. BYOC - Build Your Own Camera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://github.com/sgjava/byoc then you can use SCP or something other transport.

  13. How about an old Android phone? by DeBaas · · Score: 1

    Since you don't like the quality of Foscam, how about an old Android phone? I own a Foscam and had no problems with the quality, so I assume you want a higher resolution. Any old or cheap Android phone will likely have a high enough resolution. Combine that with something like autocam and write a small script that ftps the picture (have never tried autocam so I'm not sure if it is OK...). The phone will have wifi etc. all build in. You might needs some creativity to mount it to a wall.

    --
    ---
    1. Re:How about an old Android phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Virgin virginity detector detected.

    2. Re:How about an old Android phone? by Tronster · · Score: 1

      Thank you, this is definitely an option.

  14. Got a leftover cellphone? by larwe · · Score: 1

    Mount it where you need your "webcam". There are free webcam apps for Android (and probably for iOS - none, that are any use anyway, for Windows Phone). As long as you don't need PTZ, these are actually really good. You can port forward through your router and remote control them too - turn flash off and on, etc. And they do support uploading JPEGs. I have an old Galaxy S3 keeping an eye on my back yard.

  15. IP accessible camera still. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use many ip cameras at work and all of them allow you to access their current image as a still at (for example) 192.168.1.175/image

    But, it would need to be a real camera, not a dinky webcam or drop cam-like thing. We use cameras from Arecont Vision but any commercial grade security camera from Sony or Axis has a similar feature.

  16. Blue Iris software supports FTP and your camera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blue Iris software along with you HK camera supports FTP to anywhere (and a bunch of other stuff).

  17. Axis M-1004W by drachenfyre · · Score: 1

    The Axis M-1004W supports an FTP location as the recipient for an event. An event can be scheduled for a specific time of day. It supports 720p resolution.

    If you want anything higher then 1024p, you're probably no longer looking for a webcam.

  18. Why not try a Raspberry Pi and Camera module by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You would have a Linux box with full control and full HD!

  19. Doing it backwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously what they need to do is buy a display to project their menu with. That way they can upload the menu electronically and have the display update from that.

    Joking aside it is not uncommon to do so, had I wanted to be absurd or at least more geeky I could had suggested a cnc chalkboard like this guy built: http://vimeo.com/38425565

  20. D-Link DCS-933L by Known+Nutter · · Score: 1
    --
    Beware of the Leopard.
    1. Re:D-Link DCS-933L by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      +1 in regards to the D-Link cameras. They are easy to set up and are able to upload to an FTP server.

      If you need a higher resolution than 640 x 480, then you can look into the DCS-2132L, which is around $135 on amazon, but will give you a resolution of up to 1024x768, and also has a wider field of view than the DCS-933L 53.8 (DCS-2132L) vs 45.3 (DCS-933L), which will allow you to place the camera closer to the menu. Keep in mind that these cameras do not have a zoom feature, so you will need to take the field of view and the ideal camera location into consideration when choosing which one will work best for your needs.

    2. Re:D-Link DCS-933L by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Just spend $3 on an ebay webcam from a laptop, rig up a USB cable, and use an IP Webcam program.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    3. Re:D-Link DCS-933L by Tronster · · Score: 1

      Know Nutter: Thanks for the link.
      Anon: Thanks for the notice on the resolution... there may be a DLink solution; the one KN mentioned is a bit low (640x480) but I see there are some at 720p which may do the trick if they go in this direction.

  21. Not Hard to Find by BenFranske · · Score: 2

    Even my $20 basic D-Link (DCS-930L) IP enabled camera has FTP upload capability. I'm pretty sure the very similar TP-Link one does as well. These are not really as hard to find as the OP suggests. If you spend a few minutes looking at most of the companies that have been doing cameras for more than a couple of years you'll find plenty with FTP upload capability. Just stay away from the overpriced ones with clever names e.g. "Dropcam" and stick to something more basic. If you do want to spend some money and get a much better camera go for a commercial one like an Axis.

  22. foscam/loftek by Jmstuckman · · Score: 1

    All Foscam/Loftek cameras I've played with allow for the image to simply be retrieved as a JPEG from the camera by accessing an HTTP URL with a username/password in the query string. (Sometimes in a streaming/server-push manner, but I assume there's a way to change or work around that)

    From your question, I don't quite understand what you're trying to do with FTP, but Foscam/Loftek+wget should give you the flexibility you need. (Before buying, I recommend consulting the Zoneminder wiki/forums, as cameras that aren't flexible with their content don't work with Zoneminder either.)

    1. Re:foscam/loftek by Tronster · · Score: 1

      The end goal is to have a web-page that displays the image; FTP is just a way of getting the image to the page.
      The Foscam they tried did have FTP build in but image quality wasn't up to snuff.

      Thank you for mentioning the Zoneminder wiki/forums; that seems to be a good source of information from people having utilized the equipment they talk about.

  23. Not webcam by Livius · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I've seen restaurants use photos of the menu taken from a phone or even a serious camera, and it looks amateur. Webcam is unlikely to look better no matter what you do.

    If this menu is done daily and looks professional in the restaurant, it should be professionally done on the website, such as a PDF. If the menu is just a chalk board that someone updates by hand, possibly several times a day, then a photo should be fine, but even then you should take a proper photograph from close up and upload it.

    1. Re:Not webcam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this why so many programmers are bad?

      The OP asked a bad question because they were using the wrong keywords. You end up criticising their business ethic and workflow?

    2. Re:Not webcam by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      It's an ice cream shop. If it's like my favorite ice cream shop, that menu can change 3 times in one hour as the ice cream as ice cream is used up and new ice cream taken out for use, or as some of their dozens of flavors run out near the end of the business day.

    3. Re:Not webcam by Livius · · Score: 1

      business ethic and workflow

      Maybe look up those words.

    4. Re:Not webcam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder when it became relevant to know which flavors are available before you got to the icecream place. I just want an icecream.

  24. RaspberryPi by hodet · · Score: 1

    This would dead simple with a raspberrypi and pi camera module. Cron takes a still shot (raspistill -o filename.jpg) every 5 or 10 minutes. Rsync over ssh to your website via cron every 5 or 10 minutes. Create a nice looking webpage that displays the image. Since the image name never changes your web page is updated as soon as the new jpg is uploaded.

  25. I stopped reading at FTP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously? Plaintext passwords in 2015? What could possibly go wrong?

  26. Why a camera? by cmorgan503 · · Score: 2

    It sounds like the owner is writing a menu on a daily basis, and may be updating the menu during the course of business. Webcams has crappy resolutions, digital cameras tends to get "lost", more so when more than 1 person is using it. So, why a camera? My work has one of those digital whiteboards (yes, I know they're more expensive than a webcam), but I imagine it's possible to write once and then pressing a button, a snapshot of what is written on the whiteboard gets uploaded to the proper place?

  27. Mobotix M25 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mobotix cameras are all I use at work. Excellent image quality with FTP uploading, although a little pricey (~$800).

    1. Re:Mobotix M25 by homesteader · · Score: 1

      We used mobotix to do scheduled 5 minute uploads to an ftp site. Worked well. Their software stinks, but the hardware is very reliable and the software on camera is also reliable. You can set up multiple action profiles triggered on timers, motion or dry contact input.

      Looks like the D25 is more like $600

  28. Reiterate: Raspberry Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's already been said, but again Raspberry Pi for complete control. :)

  29. Editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why won't you edit?

  30. Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.ubnt.com/products/#all/surveillance

    1. Re:Yes by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised I didn't see UBNT earlier. You can install the (free) software on some el-cheapo VPS (assuming they don't have one for their website already) and the web interface isn't bad.

      I seem to remember the system can save an image periodically, which will be at (probably) decent enough resolution for it to be readable on a website. You could probably even use some of the other suggestions above, like having a cron job email the image to (for example) a mailing list, Twitter, Instagram, Facebook or all of the above.

      At around $100 a piece, you could even buy a 3-pack and use the other 2 for a basic surveillance system, since each camera is independently manageable (just remember that in most states you'll have to post a visible notice). For a fairly cheap, fairly simple, fairly easy to automate system, it's (probably) good enough to warrant a look.

      If the parent wasn't AC, I might even mod you up.

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
  31. Which Foscam? by Xolotl · · Score: 4, Informative

    Saying "they tried a Foscam but the quality was too poor" is like saying "they tried food but didn't like it". Which one? Foscam make dozens of models up to at least 960p (I haven't checked their range recently), I find it hard to believe they won't work for this (or at least any worse than the other manufacturers' cameras).

  32. Just implemeted something similar... by Zott · · Score: 1

    I never really looked at this stuff previously, but got to pick up on a project that had been started already. The installers used cameras from AXIS; I'm reasonably impressed by them so far.

    It sounds like you're thinking the camera should "push" and you're asking why the end-user can't control "where to". The unit that I have (M1114) gives you the ability to "pull" - this might be a better fit to your needs. Yes, a bit trickier than something that self-publishes, but much more control.

    (The big issue here was this is being used for surveillance, and there were many choices for server software, most of which were Windows-based - I'll put in a plug for 'motion', a package that we're running on Ubuntu and has been pretty flawless for what we needed. People here were impressed by the result of both the software and the hardware.)

    Don't give up, there are good industrial-grade IP camera solutions out there!

    --
    K. M. Peterson Boston inbox@kmpeterson.com
  33. Evocam FTW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get an old Mac, install Evocam on it, and go wild. It works with dozens of cameras and will do whatever you want to do with it.
    Check it out:

    http://www.evological.com/evocam.html

  34. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  35. UniFi Video Camera by nickovs · · Score: 1

    Ubiquiti Networks make some decent cameras with a whole bunch of decent features including fetching a snapshot with an HTTP request. They are designed to send their video output to their DVR software (which is actively supported on Linux) but in practice if all you need is to access still images over HTTP and video over RTSP then you can set up the control software on your laptop, fire it up once to configure the camera and then switch it off and the camera will continue to run without the DVR.

    Of course, as other posters have pointed out, the right answer is to brew your own with a Raspberry Pi and a Pi Camera.

    --
    If intelligent life is too complex to evolve on its own, who designed God?
  36. Yes, D-Link IP WebCams Can Do This by ChrisBrown1 · · Score: 1

    On the current D-Link webcams available from BestBuy (e.g. DCS-2132LB1, DCS-5222LB1) besides their "Cloud" you can configure them to upload to FTP, CIFS, Email, and SD. The setting is done through Setup -> Event Setup. Add an FTP server and event to Periodic and Trigger, for instance, once per minute.

  37. StarDot Technologies webcams run Linux by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    StarDot Technologies webcams run Linux. I have root access for my camera, and I have modified the various shell scripts in the camera to send images where I want them to be sent. In my camera FTP is supported.

  38. AFAIK no there isn't, not for a good price BUT by DesertNomad · · Score: 1

    I like your concept - it's very personal way to deliver the chalkboarded menu to the patrons who can't be there but can't be for whatever reason.

    From the camera PoV, I ran into a very similar situation as you. I wanted to grab a shot of the sky every minute, and upload it to Wunderground. I wanted a super-high-resolution image, and a camera that would work well at night. I wanted CCD. I wanted a variety of lenses.I wanted CHEAP. So, on eBay, I found what turned out to be an excellent image quality security IP cam from manufactured by someone called H264DVR. 1920x1280 px. HQ Sony 0.4" CCD. 4, 8 and 12 mm lenses. Had all those useless (at least to me) modes on motion, zones, loss of video, etc. Had tons of tweakation for video parameters (agc, low light, shutter speed, etc). Was in a waterproof outdoor assembly with a big array of IR LEDs for illumination. Was $69 apiece with a lens of your choice, and additional lenses were $7. Took a gamble with 1 and with 8 mm lens.

    Arrived. tried it out. Quality of live video astonishingly good for $70. On tripod and aimed at Orion rising, could see easily mag 8 stars in field. Array sensitivity looked very good, and could manually adjust many of the necessary parameters to make a good image. For grabbing a still, spent a few days beating my head against it. Looking on line, found some info on ways typical people and software get images from live IP streams. One was using rstp commands.
    Went back to chinese vendor, discovered (with some back and forth) that camera had a completely unmentioned rtsp:// command which was in a format completely different from what the industry uses.

    Found software called IP Time Lapse (written by Mike McCormick up in Hew Hampshire) which was rough around the edges but showed some promise in the trial demo of it. Worked with him until we got the camera working well with the software. IPTL uses ffmpeg so I imagine that it could be done by others.
    In your case, find the rtsp;// command for grabbing a stream or grabbing a single image. Once you have your single image, you've got what you need!

    Good luck.

    1. Re:AFAIK no there isn't, not for a good price BUT by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      Ive searched Ebay, and cant find the brand of camera your talking about. Are you sure that is the brand and not the seller name?

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  39. Gee doc, that sounds complicated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how about just let the owners take a picture with their smartphone and email it. Have a script to poll the inbox for a new mail, get the jpg and upload it to your webserver and delete the email. Have some logic for a failsafe operation.

    You are overcomplicating a simple thing. Welcome to /.

  40. Canon Powershot + CHDK + RPi by toygeek · · Score: 1

    CHDK loaded on a cheap used canon powershot camera, connected to a RPi via USB. CHDK script to take a picture hourly at your desired resolution, ptp it to the rpi, which you write a small cron job to sftp/rsync/ftp to the server with the correct filename. $200, heck, $100 if you shop around (Saw a Canon A530 on ebay for $15!) and some time doing the setup. Non-trivial time, mind you- but it'll do exactly what you want with a fantastic picture quality.

    1. Re:Canon Powershot + CHDK + RPi by Locutus · · Score: 1

      that's what I was thinking except for the rPi, use a WiFi enabled SD card like EyeFi to offload the pictures. The rPi might be cheaper but would require a bit more geekery but with the added ability to do more. The WiFi SD solution should be just a bit of server code to pull in the pictures. There would have to be a network and WiFi already there.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  41. The Motion App by MissNoItAll · · Score: 1

    I would look at the motion app which has a range of timed and scene change options for image capture and output. I use a web camera connected to a Raspberry Pi in conjunction with cron tasks linked to simple scripts and the dropbox applications interface to auto upload camera scenes where scene changes have been detected. Motion has an easy to use configure file and can perform change based or timed image capture. Motion allows the camera choice to determine the upper limit on image quality but other software options that set output format and compression levels, if you select them, could degrade this quality. This solution separates image file generation and capture (Camera/Motion S/W) from image transmission (script file coding) which I believe is the best architecture to work with. Everything of importance is then determined by you and not the packaged app you pick.

  42. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Restaurants are notorious for bad website design and not updating their websites with their menus very often.
    While I applaud this restaurant's impulse to actually keep their on-line menus up to date (really, I would patronize them solely for that reason if I knew who they were and they were nearby) I stand with everyone else who says, "For God's sake, snap a picture every time you write on the board and put it on-line."

  43. How about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scan it in. Sounds like you'll get the resolution you're looking for that way.

  44. Hikvision and "Why are you doing it that way" by mjensen · · Score: 1

    HikVision are not my favorite camera to use and prefer Axis or a ton of others, but they all do the same job.

    What is with needing FTP?

    You should have the corporate site web page that pulls up an image from the HikVision IP camera. That camera is password protected and will only pay attention to the web site or your programming IP address. Could do live feed or update on whatever schedule you want.

    It sounds like the main chef wants to hand-write the menu and doesn't want to do it any other way, and you are compensating for it.

  45. Dahau Cameras by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Dahau 3200S can be had fro as little as $130, does 1080p and has ftp upload built directly into the camera

  46. Please not PDF. A picture's not good either. by jddj · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Restaurant sites are what usability pros show onscreen when they want to get a belly laugh from the audience.

    The reason is that restaurants are focused on looks before usability. This leads them to use pictures of text, PDFs, and the hated Flash.

    Those technologies range from poor to complete fail when it comes to searchability, mobile adaptability, accessibility, and ability to select and copy/paste text.

    Please, use HTML text instead. It's not hard to format it beautifully with CSS, and you'll be helping patrons find you, paste the address into their contacts or GPS, share favorite stuff with friends, and get a dollar out of their hands and into yours.

    1. Re:Please not PDF. A picture's not good either. by davester666 · · Score: 1

      It also makes the site more difficult/expense to keep up to date [referring to using picts/pdfs/flash for content].

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    2. Re:Please not PDF. A picture's not good either. by firewood · · Score: 1

      Restaurant sites are what usability pros show onscreen when they want to get a belly laugh from the audience.

      The reason is that restaurants are focused on looks before usability. This leads them to use pictures of text, PDFs, and the hated Flash.

      Those technologies range from poor to complete fail when it comes to searchability, mobile adaptability, accessibility, and ability to select and copy/paste text.

      So instead the site designer creates a solution supposedly more far more "usable", and rides off into the sunset with a new slide for her presentation. But since no one actually working at the restaurant day-to-day is computer savy or has any time for keyboarding stuff while cooking or waiting on tables, the menu gets way out of date (until some waiter's kid who knows how to use the computer comes by), and the highly usable accessible searchable search result returns a bogus menu from last month.

      With a camera feed, the cooks hurriedly wipes 3-eyed fish off the board with his sleeve after throwing the last one on the grill, and no blind person walks over to order one. She calls first.

    3. Re:Please not PDF. A picture's not good either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ABSOLUTELY agree 100% with the comments posted by jddj.

    4. Re: Please not PDF. A picture's not good either. by jddj · · Score: 1

      Somebody likely typed the menu.

      Strikes me that a quick web form to copy I paste the text is a lot less elaborate than maintaining a webcam for the purpose. But that's just me.

      Good usability pros don't "ride off into the sunset" before testing to make sure the solution works well for all stakeholders, including those who must maintain the content without help.

    5. Re:Please not PDF. A picture's not good either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps a decent ocr program could do this.

    6. Re: Please not PDF. A picture's not good either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebody likely typed the menu.

      Strikes me that a quick web form to copy I paste the text is a lot less elaborate than maintaining a webcam for the purpose. But that's just me.

      Good usability pros don't "ride off into the sunset" before testing to make sure the solution works well for all stakeholders, including those who must maintain the content without help.

      You (and others) are making the assumption that the menu is typed to begin with. If it changes every day and they need to take a picture of it, it very well could be written on a chalkboard above the service counter. I have been to restaurants like this.

      Now, that still doesn't explain why Mr./Ms. Restaurant manager can't type it up after the chef writes it on the chalkboard so it can be put online. Seems like a personnel problem more than a technology problem. The owner needs to give management a daily task or find new management that can type and do their job, daily!

  47. who says "web-site" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's like saying "data base."

    I doubt your technical expertise.

  48. modern...ftp? by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

    you want a "modern" camera that will "support FTP?" No modern *anything* should. And seriously, what the hell sort of process is this that you'd do this this way? If the menu changed, then someone typed the new one. Instead of saving as a doc, save as a pdf - boom, there's your pdf. You seem to be making a convoluted process just to bill them 10x as much as they could pay, to create a complicated pathway which will be expensive and non-intuitive to maintain. Is this a job security thing?

    1. Re:modern...ftp? by synaptik · · Score: 1

      And what if this is one of those chalkboard menus, and they are wanting to recreate that vibe on their website?

      --
      HSJ$$*&#^!#+++ATH0
      NO CARRIER
    2. Re:modern...ftp? by dotwhynot · · Score: 1

      And what if this is one of those chalkboard menus, and they are wanting to recreate that vibe on their website?

      Smartphone picture to twitter or instagram and website include of latest post.

    3. Re:modern...ftp? by RoverDaddy · · Score: 1

      A lot of people have mentioned this, and I think the proper reply is: If this is they way the restaurant management is thinking, then they are misusing the web, not understanding what the customer really needs/wants, and are not going to be successful.

      As somebody else said up above, restaurant web sites are often terrible because they value form over substance. My favorite sites have a PDF of the menu, or an HTML menu available. The menu on the web site should be accurate, up to date, readable, accessible (to the blind for instance) and searchable. These are the proper priorities. Having it look like handwritten text on a chalkboard? Not so much.

      If you -are- using a chalkboard inside the restaurant, is retyping the menu onto a device for upload to your website more work? Of course it is. Too bad.

      --
      RETURN without GOSUB in line 1050
  49. The nineties called by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    The nineties called.
    They want their coffee-cam back.

  50. Trendnet TV-IP862IC by goodmanj · · Score: 1

    I've got a couple TrendNet TV-IP862IC. They support 720p H.264 video, and speak FTP and (crucially for my application) Samba.

    Caught me a burglar with 'em: he came in, poked around, noticed the camera and ripped it out of the wall, but not before the camera sent his picture to the SMB fileserver hidden in a closet. Police recognized him, picked him up, and he confessed to a string of burglaries to support his heroin habit.

    1. Re:Trendnet TV-IP862IC by Tronster · · Score: 1

      Thank you; had not heard of this brand before.
      The TV-IP562WI may do the trick.

  51. Quality too poor? Lightening ok? by houghi · · Score: 1

    I would look first at the camera that you want. Let the store take a picture and upload that to the website. I bet the quality will still be too poor, depending on how large the board is they write it on.

    A chalkboard or whiteboard is a differnt medium then a website. Much will also depend on the lighting of when the image is taken. The handwriting of the person who wrote it and so on.

    I often am unable to read the board when I am in a restaurant.
    Again, these are two differnt mediums and I am not sure if it would mix with a website.

    If I were to do it, I would buy the best webcam that works under Linux and have a small device take the images by the OS, not by the camera. That way you can SFTP it to wherever you like after doing whatever you want with it. ImageMagick can crop it and do whatever else you would need to the images.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:Quality too poor? Lightening ok? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, just wanted to say that my initial reaction was to snark at your abuse of English, but then I realized that based on the skill level you exhibited you're probably not a native speaker.

      So, I wanted to congratulate you for learning a new language and I encourage you to continue to learn. It's "lighting" and "media", BTW.

  52. Haven't gone thru comments yet by karnal · · Score: 1

    What about something that I've thought about? Using a cheapie Android phone (i.e. pay as you go, can get an LG Fuel - rootable - for $10 on sale from time to time). Obviously only if you're really into digging into coding if you want absolute security, but I'm sure there's something out there perhaps pre-packaged in an app to do what you want. I've thought of this as a sort of hacked-together security system for home just to upload video of anyone coming and going from the house. And yes, I know it's not really security - but honestly, I'll defer to a monitored service if I want the "security" portion.

    --
    Karnal
  53. New and Modern, Baah Humbug... by NReitzel · · Score: 1

    Axis webcams permit loading a single jpeg, using one of several tools, none of which include their super fancy "look at the webcam" web app.

    For example, using the *nix command "curl" gives you a jpeg of what's currently being watched, presto, no grief, no complications.

    What you -do- with the jpeg is very much up to you.

    I run multiple cameras looking out of my residence, and stuff them into motion jpeg files on a terabyte disk. I use a cron file to change files on an hourly basis, and with the number of cameras I have, I have on hand about four weeks of video coverage. I'm using an atom processor, and the whole affair was cheap and very easy to maintain.

    --

    Don't take life too seriously; it isn't permanent.

  54. Axis makes a ton of them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Axiscam. http://www.axis.com/

  55. Can you google? by houghi · · Score: 1

    I just tried google and found D-Linkthat has an FTP client and http+https So you could let the website access the camera for updates. Bit of scripting should solve it.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  56. MJPG-streamer, USB cam, and a Raspberry Pi. by AJWM · · Score: 1

    That's all you need. If you want a better quality image than a cheap USB webcam, use the Raspberry Pi camera, but a $5 USB cam works just fine if you don't need a high frame rate -- and if you're just pointing the thing at a menu, you only need one frame a day ;). The software is FOSS, and works just fine on the r-pi. I use such a setup to monitor my 3D printer from elsewhere in the house. If you need fine-grained control over who connects, well the Raspberry's running linux, so go nuts.

    Although that seems ridiculous overkill for a relatively static menu.

    --
    -- Alastair
  57. yes, webcams, ugly ugly webcams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes webcams. Those little devices that are really cheap and give you an absolutely ugly picture, or those that cost several hundred dollars and give you an absolutely ugly picture. My monitors are fairly cheap, and default to 1920x1080 (standard HD). The standard el-cheapo web cam I have provides a stunning-ly grainy 320x200 picture, and there are times when there are more colors than black and white (you should all remember that black is a color and white is a color). There is no auto-focus in this camera, no ability to deal with extremely bright or dim light. It was quite cheap, but you can spend hundreds more and basically get the same quality. Shy of going out and getting a GoPro(tm), I can't really recommend anything.

  58. Chinese Foscam Clone, $40 including s&h by pepsikid · · Score: 1

    Right on to the submitter, screw cameras that only work with a subscription, or a smartphone, or whatever.

    http://tinyurl.com/dealexcelcam14

    This is a pan/tilt camera with no zoom. I've bought 5 of these, and I'm very happy with them. I'm trying to get the neighborhood interested in buying these, so we can have a central website to run a "virtual neighborhood watch" out of, and also have pooled offsite recordings.

    They have an embedded web server, and come with basic multi-cam watching/recording s/w for windows. Smartphone app that seems to be cloud-dependent(haven't used that myself). You can retrieve still images and video streams from URLs. Embed the image in your own web page and control all of the functions by clicking buttons/links to shoot command URLs at it. Camera FTP's images upon motion detection. Connect to it with Ethernet or WIFI. With a custom profile, they work with Zoneminder Linux surveillance s/w. Has remote camera and speaker you can use as a baby monitor, or like an intercom. Pretty good night vision, including infra-LEDs. They're meant for indoors, but I've had 3 of them outside for over a year, under the roof eaves, and they're still going strong with the occasional lens cleaning.

    Only two complaints: they're really picky about voltages (5v), so Power Over Ethernet isn't stable. Mainly because the motors slurp a lot more power than the camera/networking. Secondly: they all come configured with THE SAME WIRELESS MAC ADDRESS, so you need to use an included configuration utility to fix that, and the Chinglish utility is a biotch to figure out.

    1. Re:Chinese Foscam Clone, $40 including s&h by pepsikid · · Score: 1

      "remote MICROPHONE and speaker" heh

  59. webcam, uvccapture, cron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    # photograph the menu at 9AM
    0 9 * * * uvccapture -otodaysmenu.jpg

    What other human-elimination task would you like today?

  60. Script it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use any networked computer at the local site to pull the JPG image from the camera, e.g. using WGET.
    Then upload to the server. If it works, add a cron job (applies to Linux).

  61. Foscam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look into foscam....

    I use those for home Security. They support ftpîand various other protocols.

  62. Not thinking it through. by westlake · · Score: 1

    If I were to guess, the menu changes daily and is written on something like a chalkboard or whiteboard. They could print it, but the handwriting gives it a homestyle artistic "flare" that the restaurant wants to maintain.

    Marketing 101

    The home style look you mention requires the use of real chalk and a real chalkboard. What a restaurant in this class needs is a discreet unattended webcam that can post live changes to the menu to its website.

    Fail this and you might as well go back to flipping burgers at McD's.

  63. Most IP cameras by localroger · · Score: 1

    Any IP camera that provides a URL to return the current still frame as a JPEG can be easily used for this. Write a script to grab the screenshot periodically and stick it in the directory where the web server can find it, or the script can proceed to FTP it to its rightful destination.

    --
    Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
    1. Re:Most IP cameras by Tronster · · Score: 1

      An interesting approach but it has some issues for this situation:
      1) The potential web camera is on a LAN with an IP that isn't web visible
      2) The idea is not to have to dedicate any other computers to get the image up
      3) The shop does not have a static IP address

      All of these are addressable, but if the camera can push the image out, rather than someone reach in to pull it from the camera, it seems to be a much easier task.
      (Or it would be if the Hikvision FTP was working as claimed in the manual.)

    2. Re:Most IP cameras by Locutus · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the IP cams which use someones cloud for the images have such a URL for getting the current or latest JPEG image? If they do then you could use such a cam since it would be pushing out the images. BTW, once a cam pushes out an image, there is a TCP/IP connection between the camera and service server so they can command the camera to do things without initially knowing your cameras IP or having to come into your network from 'outside'.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  64. List of beer at a bar changes every half hour? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's pretty common at beer bars to change a chalkboard menu every time a keg runs out and a new one comes on. In a busy place with 20+ taps, this can happen every half hour. I think some camera that uploads a new photo every minute or so is an awesome way to handle this.

  65. This is what GPIO was built for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of the professional IP cameras I have make this a dead simple task. Choose a decent camera from a vendor such as Axis, Pelco, Sony, Toshiba etc with external GPIO. Almost all of those cameras include 1 input and 1 output (relay). You can easily connect a push button switch ie. doorbell button and define a macro when the button is pressed FTP the image over to a specific webserver. The external inputs and outputs can be setup to do anything you want using macros saved in the camera, if there is motion turn on a light etc, or trigger an alarm system. If you stick with Axis products they have an open Linux system so can be customized further if you have those skills.

  66. Dericam IP Video cameras do this by atrimtab · · Score: 1

    Available at Amazon, eBay, etc. starting around $70. These IP cameras will email or ftp still images at 640x480 or you can "pull ftp" motion sensed videos at 720p. Dericam cameras are Linux based and "hackable" because the administrator password let you overwrite flash memory. They are also easy to unbrick *if* you mess up.

    This example is a indoor Pan-Tilt camera: http://www.amazon.com/Dericam-...

    They do have some bugs, like all these Asian made IP Cameras seem to regardless of price, but unlike almost all the others you can work or hack around them.

    --
    Facebook is billions of individual "Skinner Boxes." And if you use it you are the pigeon!
  67. Modern IP Webcams, anyone? Anyone?? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I came here to learn about Modern IP Webcams.

    There is no need for a debate about how to run a restaurant.

  68. Axis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Axis cameras FTP out of the Box

  69. Alternative by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 2

    Instead of having a camera taking a picture of a chalkboard every X minutes all the time and uploading the pictures to a website how about replacing the chalkboard with a monitor that shows the menu from the website. Then change the menu on the website to look like a chalkboard. When the chef or manager wants to update the menu they use the computer in the office to change the file and upload the changes to the website. The display in the restaurant would get updated (it could poll the web server every minute or ten) automatically. Plus the menu becomes more accessible to those with disabilities.

    1. Re:Alternative by westlake · · Score: 1

      how about replacing the chalkboard with a monitor

      The monitor is for Burger King.

      The chalkboard the hometown bar and grill or the upmarket tavern

      Trust me on this.

      I live in a border town which has been successfully cultivating a low-tech exterior to satisfy the tourist trade for 190 years.

    2. Re:Alternative by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      The camera hanging from the ceiling like the submitter wants to have kind of takes away from the low tech feeling from scene.

  70. Maybe answer the question? by ourlovecanlastforeve · · Score: 1

    Is anyone going to answer the fucking question instead of shitpicking over the phrasing and implementation?

    1. Re:Maybe answer the question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Is anyone going to answer the fucking question instead of shitpicking over the phrasing and implementation?

      I am not. But if I had mod points, you would get them. I am sick and tired of people deciding they would rather peacock by answering a question no one asked than to actually help out the person asking the question.

  71. Consider Sharx Security cameras by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sharx Security cameras have excellent video quality and allow you to send images via FTP to any location that you choose. www.sharxsecurity.com

  72. Black Swift, iSPY or curl based grabbing script by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have several options:
    1. Get this board, attach your WebCam to it and write couple of bash lines
    http://beta.slashdot.org/submission/4169167/black-swift---coin-sized-board-powered-by-32-bit-mips-cpu-at-400mhz-running-open for managing your FTP uploads.
    2. Install iSpy from http://www.ispyconnect.com/ it has FTP support
    3. I prefer D-Link cameras, just look at this list of models here http://www.ispyconnect.com/man.aspx?n=D+Link you need one which able to deliver just a JPEG frame on request.

  73. Webcam in the restaurant by tepples · · Score: 2

    I came here to learn about Modern IP Webcams.

    There is no need for a debate about how to run a restaurant.

    Unless, perhaps, you need a Modern IP Webcam to collect evidence of food mishandling in the kitchen or (in the case of fast food) violence at the counter.

  74. Simple use YAWCAM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have used YAWCAM many times. It has many options to output still and videos.

  75. If you must have a WEB CAM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get a used android phone. Download Tasker or AutoRemote. If you use Tasker, you can have the photo taken and sent where you want based on some event. If you have an android phone yourself, you can remote control the slave phone to take the phone when you desire. PHONES with cameras and wifi are cheap to do what you are wanting. Just leave the slave phone mounted where you need it to be to take the picture.

    I am with the guy that said to use HTTP and forego the picture taking. There is much more value to your operation in the end if you leverage it properly.

    It's your karma,

    Bob

  76. Y-Cam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Y-Cams can FTP (and a lot more), and have a robust documented interface. They are a UK company and don't have great US distribution, but there are several distributors and their products are well built and well supported. They are a bit more expensive, but you get what you pay for.

  77. hey, op, this us 100% a scripting issue and nor a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You really aren't doing yourself any favors by being sassy to people offering answers/clarification to your poorly phrased question.

    You need a picture of your HANDWRITTEN chalkboard menu to update daily, yes? Okay.

    But your camera will only upload to dropbox. Okay.

    It took me 30 seconds on the google to see examples of command-line curl to dropbox. So you'll have a cron script on your webserver to retrieve that image daily. Or a button on the admin page of your server to grab the day's image.

    Oh, but the image is named 'randddommnNNNaaa.jpg' on dropbox, but I need it to be 'todays menu.gif' on our website. That's pretty trivially scriptable too.

    If the last 2 paragraphs don't make sense to you, you need to hire someone to do this task.

    What you don't need is a special camera that specially posts stuff direct to your wen server.

  78. pull, not push? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have a website. Is it purely static or is there any method of scripting like Bash, PHP etc? Can DDNS overcome the dynamic IP problem? Can you open connectivity in to the camera from the webserver?

  79. Axis cameras by flashpaul · · Score: 0

    Axis IP cameras support FTP , they are expensive though As for hikvision you should be able to grab an image via http They have an SDK available If you can't find it let me know and I will check , I also thought they supported FTP But that may only be on alarm

  80. Use a Video server by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

    For this sort of thing I'd go to ebay and search on "video server." These things usually support NTSC and PAL cameras and provide them IP/web connection and motion capture with FTP and Email. The advantage of these is you're not stuck with the el-cheapo built-in cameras most IP cams have. You can get a hi-rez (>=600 line) starlight cam using a Sony Effio chip or similar for probably less than $100 (also on ebay) and get good nighttime vision and great daytime color with decent resolution as well. It's not HD, but it gives you options you won't have with an integrated IP cam unit AND it's relatively cheap. Generally you can use wget to grab stills from these, as there's usually a still grab URL. And many have motion detection FTP features as well, that can auto-upload an image to a website based on the alarm trigger, which by the way you could do with a button as most have external alarm NO/NC switch terminal inputs that will trigger the capture.

  81. Yes, but not low grade crap. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    You have to pay about $450 for the camera. AXIS work great for this.
    tell your customer to stop being a cheap bastard and spend the money on the real deal.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  82. Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the F#$%. I'm using IP cameras for almost 10 years and ALL of them have AT LEAST the ability to send images to FTP server. Mobotix and Axis are briliant, but really a total overkill for the purpose. Vivotek, Y-cam, Acti, D-link, Linksys, Trendnet, LevelOne, just name it. Of course I can't give any oppinion on cheep chinese crap.

  83. Y-Cam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Googling "ftp camera" turned up many candidates. The second one (after CameraFTP, which isn't what you want) had the context string "All Y-cam cameras have the ability to send timed or alert trigged images through an FTP server".

    Amazon lists about 1500 hits for Y-Cam. The first couple of pages show cameras up to 1080p and in the $100-$300 range, many with wall and ceiling mounts. This one [ http://www.amazon.com/Y-cam-Surveillance-Weatherproof-compatible-detection/dp/B00I4PJKGI ] should be overkill.

  84. Open Source Camera Firmware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recall there being an open-source project to replace the firmware in webcams. What happened to it?

    1. Re:Open Source Camera Firmware? by Tronster · · Score: 1

      I recall there being an open-source project to replace the firmware in webcams. What happened to it?

      Would love to know if anyone has follow up on this.

  85. Video, not pictures. by briester · · Score: 1

    You want a 2d grid of pixels on a website to change over time. That means you're making a video, not snapping pictures. It's just a video with a low frame rate. Like 1 frame/week. But it's STILL a video.

    So feed your webcam, ANY cam, to VLC or some other streaming package; set your encoder to mpeg 2, P-frame only (I.e. a series of standard jpgs); and point your website at it. Done.

  86. TrendNet TV-IP862IC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TrendNet has a good reputation across the board, availability is broad at brick and mortar and thru Amazon and other places. 3 yr warranty and comes in 1280x720 with very low light support. FTP is a supported protocol. Some tweaking may be needed, but at least you can. CMOS sensor means it will handle low light well.

  87. Plug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pull the plug

  88. find any network cams that support RTSP access :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Subject says it all find any network cams that support RTSP access :)

    and / or a LOT of the supercheap boards like the IP9000 support .jpg access for stills

                      have fun
                      anon
    ps wireshark is your friend when discovering how vendor supplied software calls for and authenticates to the RTSP Stream..

  89. Axis by backtick · · Score: 1

    I don't know your exact budget as it's not detailed but Axis has made quality webcams for >15 years (I've got a 2100 from ~2000 and it's still running fine) and they support ftp uploading. The small M10s are dirt cheap, but work well. Check out http://www.axis.com/products/m... to see. If you want something fancier look at their higher priced offerings with better features. I don't work there, own stock, resell them, etc, but I've had great luck with their cameras for a really long time.

  90. Axis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Grab an axis camera or encoder. You can grab screen shots via wget ( http get), or an api.

  91. tried 2 new csms todayand they both worked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Turned on ftp on an empire and grandstream ip cameras and both upload via ftp.

    Google ip or ip security cam vs web cam.

  92. Wrong system by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

    Use a cell phone camera and take a photo and post that if you think the digital menu is the way to go.

    That said, Foscam allows good old fashioned ftp uploads if you really want a webcam.

    --
    - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  93. Astak Mole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've used this camera in the past. It has a ton of options, even an FTP option when motion is detected. This could be easily made to upload a static image that should start updating when someone begins to change the menu and stop when they are done.

  94. Stop looking for video cameras and go with a still by gmiller123456 · · Score: 1

    Video cameras all have very low resolution compared to a still camera, so don't try to use a video camera to get a good quality still photo. Almost all still cameras today support Picture Transfer Protocol (PTP). If there's already a computer on the site, it's as simple as plugging it in and loading some free software. If not, you can add one or something like a Raspberry Pi if you're comfortable with that sort of thing. There are also things like the Eye-Fi cards that use WiFi to transfer files automatically. There's probably a dozen other ways to solve it too, I think you've just locked yourself into the idea of using a video camera for no good reason, and that's why you haven't been able to find an acceptable solution.

  95. plenty of options by easyisle · · Score: 1

    I am a systems integrator and I can say there are plenty of cameras that upload to ftp and let you chose the file extension. You should be googling for "IP Camera ftp" instead of "IP webcam". You will need to provide the camera with power and a connection to the internet. Programming is done via web browser.

  96. Support standard protocols! by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    The biggest issue today is that the new webcams that come out don't support FTP, they all support sending images/video direct to a "private cloud" (e.g., Simplicam, Dropcam, etc...).

    This is becoming a problem in lots of commercial software. iPhoto can submit pictures to Facebook in one click, but can I give it an SFTP address? It doesn't support WebDAV, but it supports DropBox!? Applications that come with digital cameras are like this. So are email programs. What the heck happened?

    1. Re:Support standard protocols! by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      This is becoming a problem in lots of commercial software. iPhoto can submit pictures to Facebook in one click, but can I give it an SFTP address? It doesn't support WebDAV, but it supports DropBox!? Applications that come with digital cameras are like this. So are email programs. What the heck happened?

      Thinking like a techie and not a common user. The common user doesn't have SFTP. They have DropBox. So an app that lets you save/publish your photos to flickr, Google Photo, Amazon and Dropbox is far more useful than having to type mystersious gobbledegook into a command prompt to set up a server, or horrors, pay for a service (note that most of those services offer a free level of account? How many SFTP sites do that?)

      Even better, they just upload the pics and the sites figure out from metadata how to organize it and boom, it's on the web.

      Remember, these people want simple - and those services offer it. In fact, if you think about it a bit, those services often have embedding capability.

      So if you want to use a commercial solution, you'll have to settle for what COTS provides. If the thing supports DropBox, then link to DropBox already (I'm sure their pro plans support deep linking).

      Else just take a simple cheap webcam and do it yourself. A webcam, a rPi and a bit of coding ought to get you what you need easily.

    2. Re:Support standard protocols! by Tronster · · Score: 1

      "Else just take a simple cheap webcam and do it yourself. A webcam, a rPi and a bit of coding ought to get you what you need easily."
      This is the exact question I'm asking.... a good quality, (cheap if possible), webcam that can quickly be setup for this task of sending images to a server for a web-page to display. So far it doesn't look to exist.

      Making it easy for the common user to send something to dropbox is fine, I just agree with Mobydisk that there should be some support for more advanced standards, if a user decides to tread there (WebDAV, SFTP, etc...). And as for FTP, it seems the cameras that support it (e.g., Foscam, Hikvision, etc...) don't support SFTP or FTP-S, the all only support vanilla, insecure, FTP....but that's a different issue.

      I went into this thinking it could all be setup in no more than a few hours one afternoon; many of these solutions will take many days. (e.g., rPi is an interesting avenue, and may be something I'll jump into, as I've wanted an excuse to play with one, but it won't be "quick")

    3. Re:Support standard protocols! by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 1

      If the thing supports DropBox, then link to DropBox already (I'm sure their pro plans support deep linking).

      Or just monitor ~/Dropbox/uploadfolder from the web server. Is this really a problem of the camera or the website hosting/software setup?

    4. Re:Support standard protocols! by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      Thinking like a techie and not a common user. The common user doesn't have SFTP. They have DropBox...
      is far more useful than having to type mystersious gobbledegook into a command prompt to set up a server, or horrors, pay for a service (note that most of those services offer a free level of account? How many SFTP sites do that?)

      There is a big misunderstanding here. I'm not telling the user to setup an SFTP site. I'm telling DropBox, Facebook, Google Photo, and Amazon to support SFTP so that iPhoto and other client software can use standard protocols.

      To expand on what I mean: the state of being where everyone uses a proprietary protocol is making it harder on everyone. Having options for "DropBox" and "Picasa" saves the user from entering a URL. But it makes it harder in every other way. Users who choose a different service are locked-out completely. Programmers now have to write code for every service they want to interact with. Testers have to test all these different sites. That drives up the cost and complexity of software. etc. etc, this is all the regular arguments for using standard protocols.

      And we certainly could have it both ways if they just make SFTP an option in the list. Now the user enters in "myservice.com/~myusername." That really isn't showstopping complexity.

      Just imagine if email clients didn't support entering an SMTP/POP server address, but instead only gave you a fixed list of options for Comcast, Google, Microsoft, or Yahoo email. ugh! Let us make sure that day never comes!

      Your point about free services is interesting. I'm searching on that now.... hmmm... Dropbox actually does support SFTP. Wikipedia has a list of backup services, and some of those support SFTP too. Google Drive does not, and I see lots of people complaining about that for the same reason as the original submitter: people buying NAS boxes, copier/scanners, etc. that can't access Google Drive. There are various "adapters" out there that convert SFTP and other protocols to work over Google Drive, Amazon S3, etc. Interesting. But those forum posts I found were 3 years old, so clearly companies aren't adapting. That's a shame.

  97. Y-cam by Retron · · Score: 1

    A Y-Cam Bullet HD 1080 takes decent quality pictures and supports FTP, but it's quite expensive as it's marketed as a security camera. It also makes a good webcam for outdoor use, such as looking into an enclosure at a wolf centre...

  98. iSentry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://macdownload.informer.com/isentry/

    Use an old phone as your webcam.

  99. Sharx is not web based, sadly by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    Sharx cameras, as far as I know, use custom software. They are not web-based. This limits the machines and applications they can talk to (pretty severely, in fact.)

    I've been in the market for an outdoor 1080p camera that would go to the web (or start there) basically since the tech hinted it was possible; so far, it's all proprietary stuff. I've got an NTSC one that does it, and it's awesome, except, as I said, it's NTSC so basically it's blur city.

    Hopefully someone, someday, will realize there are a bunch of us out here who would buy weatherproof hires IP cameras with built-in web servers in a heartbeat. For less than thousands of dollars. It's hard to swallow that kind of price when you know you're looking at under $100 worth of hardware. That's if it's a pretty nice one.

    Heck, I can buy a dedicated DVR with *multiple* 1080p cameras, cables, and power supplies for less than a some of the "good" ones being discussed here. With a WEB interface. From a store that is known for overpricing everything is sight!

    All I want is one bloody outdoor camera to watch the neighborhood cats in our cat house. :)

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  100. OpenWRT+ UVC USB webcam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fswebcam @ OpenWRT, + UVC USB webcam + simple shell script and you are on track. Cheaper and with more control.

  101. ftp-capable software on a PC? by bobmon · · Score: 1

    What about some software such as yawcam? I'm no expert, but it does show a screenshot that offers a number of upload formats, including ftp. An old pc, a basic usb camera, and software like this might do what you want.

    --
    Has anyone seen my eucalyptus tree?
  102. Dlink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi there,

    Dlink makes security cameras that can upload to ftp or an email address.

  103. IP Camera by chipperdog · · Score: 1

    Cameras from Ubiquiti, Vivotek, Axis, and many others support retrieving the current image jpg through a http request to the camera..

  104. Making it more complex than it has to be by s13g3 · · Score: 1

    Cheap IP cam takes picture, stores to local HDD. Directory on local is sym-/hard-linked to directory (wherever it lives, via whatever standard methods are available depending on your configuration) to either the appropriate image path for the website, overwriting the previously existing image, OR, to a directory where the existence of a new/updated file will prompt an FTP transfer to the serverhost where the website lives.

    Many cameras, cheap or expensive, still fully support the saving of still images to a directory on a computer on the local network, regardless of whether the camera is hard-wired or wireless. Other tools and functionality will be present depending on OS for automating any further copies or FTP transfers that may be necessary.

    --
    "Inveniemus Viam Aut Faciemus" 'We will find a way... Or we will make one!' --Hannibal of Carthage
  105. Cheap smartphone by iamacat · · Score: 1

    It will have a much better camera than a high end commercial Webcam and, if there is no existing $0.99 app, you can easily write one to take photos/videos and upload them to a location of your choice. Bonus: can work without another Internet connection, or even provide a WiFi Hotspot to employees/customers while still functioning as a wwbcam.

  106. Or, alternately by phorm · · Score: 1

    Have it made up pretty on the webpage. Have the contents of the webpage displayed on some sort of display in the restaurant.

    I've seen this done before. You could easily edit the page with some of the WYSIWYG editors.

  107. Hikvision by onceuponatime · · Score: 1

    Actually, your hikvision will likely have very good quality. The 3MP ones have 2048x1536 resolution. However, don't use the hikvision to push the image to some place, instead use a simple script to pull a snapshot image from the Hikvision. Hikvision supports single snapshot image request and you could do with simply with a wget call I expect. A few lines of shell script and it's integrated into your menu system.

  108. Sighthound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Formerly vitamin D software.https://www.sighthound.com/

  109. if using windows, this is your solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i use iSpy to control multiple webcams and their output. ftp, youtube, all sorts of outputs available, all running in parallel (output to multiple!)

    http://www.ispyconnect.com/

    i can't describe how well this has worked for me. hope it suits you!

  110. backwards! by DriveDog · · Score: 1

    Just put a bunch of menus in the computer, have it randomly choose one each day to serve up on the internet, and make whatever it chooses.

  111. YAWCam by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

    I've been wildly successful using the small app YAWCam, see http://www.yawcam.com/ It is free to use and about the best and easiest software for webifying plain old USB web cams around. The downside is that you need some sort of Windows PC to go along with it. If that is not an option give the various Foscam wireless webcams a try, I have an older one that films away 24x7 monitoring my backyard. They have settings for specifying image upload to an FTP server without any of the cloud crap. These cameras are inexpensive, so heavy duty pan/tilt action might wear them out sooner than expected. In your (as well as in my) case the position will be static most of the time. These cameras also come with IR night vision if needed, but that can be disabled, which is what you want to do if you mount the camera inside looking out through a window. The IR light reflects in the window and makes the images useless. I have it set so that every three seconds and image is uploaded. On my FTP server I also run a script that dumps image files that are older than two days just to keep the amount of files manageable. In your case you should be fine with a much longer period. You may still need a script that fires as often to find the most recent file and rename it so that the web site can retain a static link. I don't remember if there is a means to set the file name in the camera config so that it constantly overwrites the old image. That said, the PDF route is way easier albeit less geeky, but definitely more reliable. The web cam idea is neat, but it is like using a cannon to shoot at sparrows.

  112. IP Camera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ICRealtime is probably going to be your best bet. they make DVR's and NVR's that allow FTP downloading.
    kindof pricey, but i install them all the time and it is quality products.

  113. EyeFi, Canon EOS +WFT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't seen them mentioned here: Any Point+Shoot or DSLR camera + a (suitable) EyeFi SD-Card, or a Canon EOS with WFT or a 70D or sx280, or maybe a Sony NEX with WiFi should be able to automatically upload images taken via WiFi+FTP or HTTP.