Slashdot Mirror


Staples To Buy Office Depot For $6.3 Billion

An anonymous reader writes: Today Staples announced plans to buy Office Depot in a deal worth $6.3 billion. This is a huge consolidation within the office supply industry. Office Depot and OfficeMax were the second- and third-biggest suppliers when they merged in 2013. Adding those to the enormity of Staples would effectively bring the U.S. under a single office supply chain. "The move is expected to draw scrutiny from the Federal Trade Commission, though regulators have been increasingly willing to approve retail mergers in light of burgeoning e-commerce competition. ... This isn't the first time Staples has tried to buy Office Depot. In 1997, the FTC derailed Staples' acquisition of its rival as anticompetitive. By 2013, though, the agency's view had shifted. When the FTC allowed Office Depot to buy OfficeMax, it said the advent of online retailing ensured competition in the market for office supplies. Consumers today also rely more heavily on big-box chains such as Wal-Mart Stores Inc. for office products, the commission said."

105 comments

  1. No problem getting this merger passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    They'll just push the Easy Button and it will fly through the FTC, right?

    1. Re:No problem getting this merger passed by q4Fry · · Score: 5, Funny

      New company slogan: The Only Button.

    2. Re:No problem getting this merger passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New company slogan: The Only Button.

      Push it.

    3. Re:No problem getting this merger passed by GTRacer · · Score: 2

      "A sign lit up saying, 'Please do not push this button again.'"

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    4. Re:No problem getting this merger passed by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      The fact that according to OP the FTC has "changed its position" has no bearing on whether FTC should change its position. Monopoly is monopoly, and there is nothing in society or the economy that has changed that makes it any less bad today than it ever was.

    5. Re:No problem getting this merger passed by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Monopoly or no monopoly, larger corporations have proven to be very unhealthy for society, democracy and the economy. There should really be a limit upon how large they get. Seriously, governments should be considering strangling wall street to death in favour of rebuilding main street.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    6. Re:No problem getting this merger passed by avgjoe62 · · Score: 1

      Push it real good.

      Obligatory YouTube Link

      --

      How come Slashdot never gets Slashdotted?

    7. Re:No problem getting this merger passed by unitron · · Score: 1

      What monopoly?

      The monopoly happens when Staples, Office Depot, and Office Max banded together still aren't strong enough to survive the onslaughts of Wal-Mart/Sam's and Costco on the B&M side and Amazon (and maybe a little Quill) on the web side, and now there are 3 more empty buildings in town to keep company the places that used to be local hardware stores and lumberyards before Lowe's and Home Depot came to town.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    8. Re:No problem getting this merger passed by nhat11 · · Score: 1

      Eh does anyone even read the article? lol

    9. Re:No problem getting this merger passed by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      The monopoly happens when Staples, Office Depot, and Office Max banded together still aren't strong enough to survive the onslaughts of Wal-Mart/Sam's and Costco on the B&M side

      2 of your 3 examples are not even retail stores.

      And I'm not going to boo-hoo competition from Amazon or Quill. Montgomery Ward and Sears became mail-order powerhouses more than 150 years ago. Nothing has changed except for the way in which the catalogs are delivered and payments are made. Everything else is still THE SAME.

  2. Great by evil+crash · · Score: 1

    There go the prices on toner and paper.

    --
    "Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job."-THG
    1. Re:Great by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How so? There is a lot of competition in this space. In the Northeast you are probably familiar with WB Mason, which does not use the retail store model. If you are a consumer, Walmart sells toner for most home printers (and obviously paper as well). For businesses, there are plenty of "Dunder Mifflins" out there. Costco, Sam's Club, etc. And then there is the explosion of internet-only office supply companies.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:Great by darkmeridian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I am a small business owner, and I have to say that this is not the case. The Internet is the great equalizer. I can buy toner and paper online from NewEgg, Amazon, Costco, W.B. Mason, or Walmart. If Staples decided to jack up the prices, then I'd simply order somewhere else. I don't like splitting up my vendors, either. If I order toner and paper from one company, then I'm usually going to take my coffee and other stationery business somewhere else. The vendors all know this so they're always trying to use paper as a loss-leader to get your business on the other items.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    3. Re: Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You still use paper and toner? That's cute.

    4. Re: Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is great. Office depot is shit. Why not merge? Both co's have the same shitty toner/ink programs. Whereas Office Max will give you on the spot in-store credit. Besides that small but very irritating point, who really gaf where the office crap comes from because it's all chinese stuff to fucking begin with. It's not like business owners are demanding american made dongles much less pen and paper. And again, this will in no particular way effect online storefronts who, as well, get their stuff from the same fucking supplier - china.

    5. Re:Great by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      If you planned ahead you bought that online already. Far better prices on paper and toner Via Amazon plus I dont have to carry it. The fedex guy does.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:Great by jbengt · · Score: 1

      I wonder which of the stores in my neighborhood is going to close, the Office Max, or the Staples about a half a mile away?

    7. Re:Great by afidel · · Score: 1

      Amazon with Prime is another serious competitor.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    8. Re:Great by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Amazon in the past ten years has changed a lot of retail. Prime is ten years old now.

      I can get printer ink delivered either the next day, or the day after for less than the cost of Staples, and there is no order min.

      So a $15 ink cart shows up just when I need it.

    9. Re: Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where at I also have a max and staples

  3. So, Staples Is Evil? by Press2ToContinue · · Score: 2

    enormity
    inôrmd/
    noun
    1.
    the great or extreme scale, seriousness, or extent of something perceived as bad or morally wrong.
    "a thorough search disclosed the full enormity of the crime"
    2.
    a grave crime or sin.
    "the enormities of the regime"
    synonyms: wickedness, evil, vileness, baseness, depravity

    --
    Sent from my ENIAC
    1. Re:So, Staples Is Evil? by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      If you had clicked the "show more" button you would have gotten to:

      enormity
      inôrmd/
      noun
      noun: enormity; plural noun: enormities
      1.
      the great or extreme scale, seriousness, or extent of something perceived as bad or morally wrong.
      "a thorough search disclosed the full enormity of the crime"
      (in neutral use) the large size or scale of something.
      "I began to get a sense of the enormity of the task"
      synonyms: immensity, hugeness; More

    2. Re:So, Staples Is Evil? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Typically "enormous" appears to be used in the sense of "very large", and "enormity" in the sense of "very evil". I rarely see "enormity" used to mean "great size".

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  4. *presses merge button* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was easy.

  5. Next RadioShack by Luthair · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is anyone else surprised Staples isn't bankrupt? No one ever goes there and the only time I hear about Staples is when a deal site mentions yet another category is on clearance.

    1. Re:Next RadioShack by suprcvic · · Score: 1

      I'm not surprised. I'm sure they make most of their money on government and corporate contracts. Here in Georgia, at one time, they had the contract to supply the government with office supplies.

    2. Re:Next RadioShack by Primate+Pete · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As I recollect, Staples does huge business with small and medium companies, mostly on a delivery basis. Having been in their stores, I doubt walk-in customers are a large part of their revenue. One potential outcome here would be for Staples to close its retail locations (they suck) so that that the better-stocked Office Depot can handle individual/walk-in customers while the Staples brand focuses on the B2B market via internet & delivery.

      That said, I don't have a good feeling about the decrease in the number of office supplies stores near my home, which WILL decrease my options.

    3. Re:Next RadioShack by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Is anyone else surprised Staples isn't bankrupt?

      I am surprised. I predicted their demise when they bought the naming rights to the "Staples Center" sports arena in Los Angeles. Wasting capital on such frivolities is often a sign of impending doom.

    4. Re:Next RadioShack by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      I was going to say the same thing about our local Office Depot. I go in there maybe once every 1-2 years, and it's always just about empty. And I f it wasn't for their UPS desk, I bet 80% of that already sparse customer base would not be there.

      I've got nothing against this particular company, but I think time has passed them by.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    5. Re:Next RadioShack by bws111 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Apparently 'no one' bought $22.7B worth of stuff last year, with EBITDA of $1.46B.

    6. Re:Next RadioShack by netsavior · · Score: 5, Informative

      A Staples store is a warehouse for their office supply delivery business. The retail presence is more there for brand awareness and a showcase.

      To contrast, Radio Shack is a cellphone kiosk that once sold electronics.

      This is about like wondering how Bank of America can stay in business if nobody uses safety deposit boxes anymore.

    7. Re:Next RadioShack by Burdell · · Score: 1

      I think Staples vs. Office Depot/Office Max retail locations is similar to Home Depot vs. Lowes. In some areas, one is better, while in others, a different one is better.

      Where I live, Staples has multiple locations that are clean, organized, well-stocked, and always have customers. They have copy/printing services, UPS shipping, etc. There's only one Office Depot location, which is dirty, in a way oversized space (so when you walk in the front door, there's about 30 feet of empty space before you get to the registers and then merchandise), always disorganized and sold out of what you want. Individuals, teachers, small business people, etc. all go to Staples; the only reason to go to Office Depot is if you are in a hurry and you are by their store.

    8. Re:Next RadioShack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh. I assumed it was named after Mavis.

    9. Re:Next RadioShack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They make the easy techs sell very over priced stuff and can them if they can't sell.

    10. Re:Next RadioShack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I'll grant you the importance of geographic variation, combined with randomness. In my area, the Office Depot is more or less like a warehouse, dusty and dark in the corners.

      The Staples is well lit, but everything is dirty and worn, the lights are kept bright to discourage thieves (I think), and the floors are worn through the linoleum to the brown substrate. The staff is barely awake, but trying to keep an eye on the customers, mostly so that they can hide in the back fast enough to avoid being bothered. It feels like a 7-11 at 3 a.m., but it feels like that during daytime hours.

      I don't like either store, but I do think they supply enough competition to make each other keep up the appearance of trying. With that gone, both stores will be subterranean hellscapes with pallets of post-it notes, packages of gray-brown printer paper, and Hannah Montana notebooks blocking the aisles.

    11. Re:Next RadioShack by LMariachi · · Score: 1

      I think people go there but they don’t spend time browsing. They know they just need printer ink and a ream of paper, and they need them today. There's not much in the way of entertainment or impulse items to distract shoppers and extend their visit time.

      (Personally I enjoy browsing office supplies -- something about the orderly arrangement of useful objects is pleasing to me -- but that's probably not entirely normal.)

  6. Their buying clout alone should end this deal. by operator_error · · Score: 1

    No way should any company of that size and market share have such buying clout with the supply chain to which they are distributing. And that says nothing even of the consumer perspective.

    1. Re:Their buying clout alone should end this deal. by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Except that this isn't the 1990s anymore. You can get supplies from all sorts of online distributors and Walmart (of course). There is still competition. Better competition, in fact. We just have the perception that there is this thing called an "Office Supply Store" and that owning all of those means that office supplies are now under a monopoly. The reality is that a specialized brick and mortar supply store like that is a concept that is no longer the most cost effective means of getting office supplies. They are a breed that needs to consolidate significantly in order to comfortably inhabit a smaller, much more specialized niche than it used to.

    2. Re:Their buying clout alone should end this deal. by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      This shouldn't be a problem with Staples would be competing with other big freaking businesses. Costco, Amazon, Newegg, and Walmart are all competitors with Staples for office supplies. If Staples decided to jack up the price, then consumers wouldn't wait to move their business. And if Staples wanted to play hardball with their vendors, then the vendors would simply take their business to other outlets. I buy lots of paper, toner, and K-Cups. Hammermill, Brother, and Keurig aren't going to get pushed around by anyone.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    3. Re:Their buying clout alone should end this deal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can, but most of the items they sell aren't expensive enough to justify buying online due to the cost of shipping them. Sure, if you're needing toner or ink that's probably expensive enough that buying online is a reasonable option. But, if you just need a couple packages of paper, are you really going to order that online?

      Also, what about those times when you genuinely have to have it today? Allowing one chain to dominate the brick and mortar operation is just asking to take advantage of people that need the supplies today rather than the customary mark up for having a retail presence.

      Not to mention the convenience of returning it if it doesn't work properly.

      Online is great, but it's hardly a substitute for competition in the physical retail outlet space.

    4. Re:Their buying clout alone should end this deal. by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      Hammermill, Brother, and Keurig aren't going to get pushed around by anyone.

      Don't be so sure. Those UPC barcodes on everything came from Wal-Mart's foisting them off on anyone who even dreamed of seeing their products in the Walton stores.

      There's a lawnmower manufacturer who balked, because they didn't want their quality standards watered down by fiat just so they could be an Everyday Low Price in the Wal-Mart garden shop, but a lot of companies aren't so devoted.

    5. Re:Their buying clout alone should end this deal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously? You're talking about a store that occupies a tiny niche of the same market as WalMart (just to drop a name) and you think there needs to be some kind of anti-trust action against this merger? That would be like Subaru buying out Saab and GM filing an anti-trust petition.

    6. Re:Their buying clout alone should end this deal. by skelly33 · · Score: 1

      This merger doesn't alarm me because I don't see anything special about Staples or OfficeMax. I am constantly going into my local OfficeMax with unreasonably high hopes and finding myself disappointed with their selection. I can get everything in that store at my local K-Mart, Target, BestBuy, Costco, or any of a dozen other local small businesses. Near as I can tell, they only thing they offer is the convenience of not having to hit 2-3 of those other stores because they have everything you're looking for under the one roof.

    7. Re:Their buying clout alone should end this deal. by ilparatzo · · Score: 1

      "But, if you just need a couple packages of paper, are you really going to order that online?"

      The brick and mortar stores can't stay in business because of the occasional need to pick something up like that same day, especially when there is competition from own market AND from the likes of Walmart. Most businesses, the bread and butter of their revenues, are getting deliveries in bulk. Stores like Walmart, Target and similar can often cover the one time needs of stuff that may run out. It would probably be more profitable for a place like Staples to allow you to stop by their distribution warehouse in an emergency, or just allow same-day for a premium or X number of same day "emergency" drop offs as part of a contract.

      With continued competition, these stores are going to get worse and worse and they eat away at each other while both are getting needled by the mega-store chains. I'd rather have one store that is maybe more expensive (I doubt it though, given the other secondary competition they face both physical and online) and has a decent selection, then two stores that are tiny and worthless.

    8. Re:Their buying clout alone should end this deal. by michaelwigle · · Score: 1

      Again, that's where competition comes in. I'll plug my agency's online store http://www.cincysight.com./ Prices equal to or better than Office Depot and Staples with no shipping charges, packages typically arrive within 2-3 business days of the order (admittedly not same day convenience), and returns are very easy (and during business hours you can call to talk to a person about your order). Now, I'm not saying I'm in favor or against the merger. I don't really care either way. But there really is more competition out there than folks think. It's just hard to stand out in the mass of online retailers.

    9. Re:Their buying clout alone should end this deal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sheer amount of ink, and toner that staples purchases is at least double that of any of your mentioned vendors. I'd be willing to bet that Staples can get better pricing than Amazon with a lower admin cost than the likes of amazon.

  7. New name: Staples Depot, Office Staples by JoeyRox · · Score: 5, Funny

    Or my favorite, "Antique Supply Store"

    1. Re:New name: Staples Depot, Office Staples by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the input. Seriously, very insightful. I'm almost gobsmacked by this post.

    2. Re: New name: Staples Depot, Office Staples by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would much prefer "Chinese Office Store".
      Fucking Retard

    3. Re:New name: Staples Depot, Office Staples by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dipshit.

  8. what? by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    How can you buy something that isn't a thing anymore? Office Depot and OfficeMax merged. Did they only buy half the newly merged company? Did they cancel the merger? Is Staples buying both companies?

    1. Re:what? by bws111 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Huh? They merged. The new company is called Office Depot. Office Max no longer exists. What is so hard to understand?

    2. Re:what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Office Max still exists as a brand name owned by Office Depot. They never rebranded or changed the signage on the Office Max locations in my area.

      Interestingly, they kept most of the Office Max locations in this area because the Office Depot locations were in old, run-down failed-big-box-store locations with bad traffic patterns and poor maintenance. The Office Max locations here were mostly in the shiny new shopping plazas. They never bothered to rebrand any of them, and their seasonal sales floor signage still says Office Max.

      I attribute this mostly to how people will still say "Office Depot... Max... Depot... Whatever" when referring to those stores. They were basically interchangeable. Staples will have to rebrand. Especially since they have exactly ZERO stores in this area.

    3. Re:what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever seen any of the other inane ramblings that slashmydots has put out there? He's easily among the most dimwitted of all Slashdot commentators.

    4. Re:what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At my home town, we have an Office Depot, Staples, and OfficeMax. Yes, the OfficeMax sign still says OfficeMax, so do all their name tags. It's like asking why it's so hard for people to get that Kroger owns all the name stores they do.

  9. Just a theory by Andrio · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think if someone were to create a simulation model of a truly free market with no regulation, and seed it with hundreds (thousands) of little businesses to start with, given enough time, you'll end up single monopoly that controls every industry, service, and product.

    --
    The Internet King? I wonder if he could provide faster nudity.
    1. Re:Just a theory by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      I think if someone were to create a simulation model of a truly free market with no regulation, and seed it with hundreds (thousands) of little businesses to start with, given enough time, you'll end up single monopoly that controls every industry, service, and product.

      Generally speaking, that is correct - the end game for a completely free market is monopoly.

      Though, in the retail sector, I'm fairly certain there's plenty of competition in office supplies. Sure for walk-in business there's Staples and Office Depot, but few people do walk-in to get office supplies (mostly just home businesses). Everyone else orders from a catalog or online, and it doesn't matter if the truck says Staples, Amazon, Costco, Home Depot, Ikea or others. If you need 20 desks, you order 20 desks and a truck comes by with 20 desks. Rarely do people go to a supply store and order 20 desks that way.

      Most walk-in traffic for Staples is usually for their print center or to grab emergency supplies - the office is out of paper and you need a ream of 8.5x11 stat. (But even then, those kinds of sundry supplies are carried by lots of stores).

      In the B2B world, Staples is not your only choice for office supplies. Maybe if you walk into the store, but most businesses phone or online order their supplies. It's quicker, easier and often cheaper because someone doesn't have to run out to the store at full salary.

    2. Re: Just a theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Capitalistism actually end up with oligopolies , ie a small number of very large companies. There are economies of scale that pressure companies to consolidate, that can keep competition pressure low. Mom and pop cannot compete with the diversity of products at a Walmart.

      But, it takes the government to introduce monopolies, where competition is legally restricted, like utilities. This is where you get the fascist/ crony capitalists that use the gov to prevent competition altogether.

    3. Re:Just a theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sim Capitalism? I would love that game!

    4. Re:Just a theory by RabidReindeer · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think if someone were to create a simulation model of a truly free market with no regulation, and seed it with hundreds (thousands) of little businesses to start with, given enough time, you'll end up single monopoly that controls every industry, service, and product.

      It seems to depend on what the business is. If a business is capital-intensive, commodity-based and can benefit from economies of scale chances are that, yes, a positive feedback loop will be established and, as the old maxim goes, "nothing succeeds like success".

      On the other hand, not all businesses are driven solely on price. Multiple big players exist in such things as fast food and pizza joints, but within the big chains, I'll avoid MacDonalds and hit Burger King because to me McD's milkshakes taste like library paste. And the local neighborhood pizzaria beats Papa John's 20 ways from Sunday. Because what they're selling is a commodity only in broad terms.

      There exist also Natural Monopolies where it's essentially a Buyer's or Seller's Market. A classic example is a product that requires laying down underground cables to individual residences. It's simply not tolerable to have 37 different companies rooting around in the dirt all the time, so the "last mile" belongs to a chosen few.

      Stuff like this is why auto-quacking that The Market Solves Everything makes one look like an idiot. There are so many exceptions even before the big mean government steps in. In fact, a true Free Market is a pretty rare (and often short-lived) bird.

    5. Re:Just a theory by retroworks · · Score: 1

      If by "no regulation" you mean people do whatever they want (hire professional assassins, etc.), then that might be true, I guess, for commodities markets. You'd have to study the cocaine distribution or heroin distribution "cartels". But in that scenario the corporation itself would have no control against internal theft etc., you may not ever know who's in charge, even civil law would be in question, and you would wind up with chaos (like ISIS or the drug trade).

      If you are just postulating a "rigged" system where some laws are enforced, but not antitrust or restraint of trade laws, I think we been there, done that. The two remedies to it were antitrust law (including civil lawsuits), and international trade (see what happens to USSR auto monopolies when they have to compete with Toyota or Volkswagon.

      --
      Gently reply
    6. Re:Just a theory by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      That's every game of Monopoly ever played.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    7. Re:Just a theory by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      We have that. It's called "Monopoly."

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    8. Re:Just a theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most walk-in traffic for Staples is usually for their print center or to grab emergency supplies - the office is out of paper and you need a ream of 8.5x11 stat. (But even then, those kinds of sundry supplies are carried by lots of stores).

      You obviously don't have kids or, at least, haven't had to buy their school supplies. The local Staples/Office DepotMax is a madhouse around here just before school starts.

  10. Crap by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

    Well, there goes the last decent brick'n'mortar office store, who had previously merged with Office Max. Staples only carries the most base of common office supplies, their inventory was never as diverse as Office Depot. Everytime I looked for something a little different , like Frixion pens, or the Pilot Plumix, when they first came out, there was no sign of them at Staples - "Yeah, we got that" ?? No, no you don't. But the other two always did. Now it's game over, and yet another monopoly has formed.
    RIP Sherman Act.

    --

    Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    1. Re:Crap by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 1

      There's this awesome invention called "the internet", where you can find exactly what you're looking for and purchase it without ever having to go into a store. It works especially well for times you're looking for specific products instead of just browsing. There's even a great deal of competition and independent sellers that help keep prices down.

    2. Re:Crap by jbengt · · Score: 1

      So, last Sunday, when I needed a new mouse, I could have ordered it online and begun to work within the 15 minutes it took me to pick one up at the local Office Max?

    3. Re: Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The OP was talking about specialty pens, not something mission critical like a mouse.

    4. Re:Crap by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Nooo... really? When did that come out?
      That's why I often resort to Amazon. But since I have a Staples less than 2 miles from my house, it would be nice if they carried more than 2 brands of pen or whatever.. and I wouldn't have to wait for it.. and pay shipping as well. Same with Home Depot too, Lowes carries all the little odds and ends I can never find at a Home Depot.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    5. Re:Crap by jmac_the_man · · Score: 1

      Maybe from a touchscreen device?

    6. Re:Crap by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      No, actually, I'd probably go to Target if my mouse broke. They don't have everything Office * has, but they have most of the stuff I'd need in sooner than two or three business days.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  11. Doesn't matter to me in the least by paiute · · Score: 4, Funny

    I get all my office supplies by stealing them from work.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:Doesn't matter to me in the least by barureddy · · Score: 2

      I get all my office supplies by stealing them from work.

      Chances are your office buys its supplies from Staples.

    2. Re:Doesn't matter to me in the least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get all my office supplies by stealing them from work.

      Chances are your office buys its supplies from Staples.

      The office steals its supplies from headquarters. It's thieves all the way down.

    3. Re:Doesn't matter to me in the least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it is regional or the fact there is no Office Depot or Staples with in ~2 hours drive of here, but most companies I do business here seem to use Quill.com as the primary place for office supplies. Costco would be the second and Amazon running third.

      I don't see this merger changing much of anything....at least around here.

    4. Re:Doesn't matter to me in the least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a how-to manual: http://www.amazon.com/Build-Better-Stealing-Office-Supplies/dp/0836217578

  12. What has this got to do with tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So a report about an outdated bricks and mortar retail chain buying another outdated bricks and mortar retail chain that both specialise in selling outdated products for the outdated paper office makes it onto slashdot?

    This is like the antithesis of 'news for nerds'.

    1. Re: What has this got to do with tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I happen to like Staples and I don't really care who they merge with. I like 'em because they're half a block from me. Other than that, any business owner ahead of the game, has their shit delivered and shops online from the cheapist supplier he can call. And he does this without even having to get out of his chair.

  13. and thus a new wal mart is born by nimbius · · Score: 4, Funny

    Imagine of you will a 224,000 square foot shangri la of office. An entire area devoted to a sea of elderly men browsing ink jet printers, remarking on how great a deal theyre getting, and haggling the price of toner cartridges. their revalry interrupted twice daily by the passing of a thunderous freight-train of 13 year olds wheeling through the store on castered office seating. Imagine a copier the size of a two story house that still cant manage to fax correctly. In one long aisle, a veritable modern art museum of van goghs who have tested billions of different markers and pens in search for the one true biro. Picture a moutain of paper manned by khaki clad teenage sherpas who will guide the worthy to the perfect gloss of 8x11 in a 12 man expedition, using the bodies of the dead to guide their way. This new realm of office will succor a distant memory of office stores of yore with its array of overly lit fluorescent display stands and vallies of fake laptops and monitors perched upon particle board desks assembled by a small factory of hung-over college kids. and when at long last you think it can offer no more, this store will offer the most pointless of all selections of office treats and candies in 600 pound bulk tyvek totes that can conveniently be stacked onto any customers shopping fork truck. This office store will be visible for miles from the thick rolling smoke emenating from the innumerable propped doors featuring a staff of thousands competing in a veritable olympic competition of cigarette consumption as they all collectively 'burn one' while having told a customer they will search a 'back room' that does not exist for a product that cannot be sold.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:and thus a new wal mart is born by Drethon · · Score: 1

      Was I supposed to hear that as a Futurama "The Scary Door"?

    2. Re:and thus a new wal mart is born by asylumx · · Score: 1

      I immediately went to the image of Costco from Idiocracy.

  14. 3 companies became 2... by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    Then 2 became 1.
    And finally 1 goes to 0.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  15. arc supplies more commonly available? by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

    Hopefully this means I won't have to drive as far to get my Arc refills.

    --

    *sigh* back to work...
  16. Re:Obama's Administration LOVES monopolies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, at a time when unemployment is at its lowest for years. Stay in your dreamworld of Fox News.

  17. box o'chains by chilenexus · · Score: 1

    "Consumers today also rely more heavily on big-box chains" Aren't Staples and Office Depot included in the definition "big-box chains"?

  18. It'd be ironic if... by afaiktoit · · Score: 1

    when staples went to check out office depot was no longer in stock.

  19. I clicked the More button and got... by Press2ToContinue · · Score: 1

    outrageousness, monstrousness, hideousness, heinousness, horror, atrocity; villainy, cruelty, inhumanity, mercilessness, brutality, savagery, viciousness.

    Wiktionary states: Enormity is frequently used as a synonym for "enormousness," rather than "great wickedness." This is frequently considered an error; the words have different roots in French, and radically different accepted meanings

    As far as I can tell, the vernacular usage of enormity to which you refer is a rather recent addition to the definition, and first came into usage during the media coverage of Bush Jr's lavish inauguration, during which reporters referred to the "enormity" of the proceedings.

    An adjective has rarely been abused in so fitting a way as that.

    The media has repeated that usage slavishly since then.

    --
    Sent from my ENIAC
    1. Re:I clicked the More button and got... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wiktionary states: Enormity is frequently used as a synonym for "enormousness," rather than "great wickedness." This is frequently considered an error;

      Real dictionaries list both meanings.

      the words have different roots in French, and radically different accepted meanings

      Yes, but they have the same root in Latin

      As far as I can tell, the vernacular usage of enormity to which you refer is a rather recent addition to the definition, and first came into usage during the media coverage of Bush Jr's lavish inauguration

      Well, then you can't tell shit, because that usage has been around since the 18th century

    2. Re:I clicked the More button and got... by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      As far as I can tell, the vernacular usage of enormity to which you refer is a rather recent addition to the definition, and first came into usage during the media coverage of Bush Jr's lavish inauguration, during which reporters referred to the "enormity" of the proceedings.

      Perhaps you might just try a basic internet search and you might find out how wrong you are.

      Your "incorrect" usage was first recorded in the late 1700s and in recent decades constitutes roughly 75% of all occurrences of the word. This prescriptivist battle was likely lost more than a half-century ago. Heck, I remember Obama using the "wrong" meaning (i.e., hugeness) in his inaugural address.

      I only use the word to mean a "great evil," but pretending that it only means that or that the "hugeness" thing is a recent phenomenon is just living in denial of the facts... Which happens to most people who nit-pick grammar. I long ago realized all I can do is police my own usage, and the rest of the world is likely ignorant of these distinctions... Worse, many of these distinctions never occurred in natural language anyway but were made up by some silly person in the 1800s (though not the present case of "enormity").

  20. Re:Obama's Administration LOVES monopolies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It turns out that you're an insane wingnut, desperately in need of psychiatric help.

  21. New slogan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Office Depot, office max? We got that"

  22. Re:Great? by bigpat · · Score: 1

    I'm usually strongly against anything that reduces competition, but Staples and Office Depot merging seems like a shrug off in this market. Neither seems like a business on the upswing nor are there big barriers to entry for selling the types of products they sell. If anything I would be concerned that the merger costs and failure to integrate the businesses alone are going to kill both companies and reduce competition in that way.

  23. Destroy the Competition by Zalbik · · Score: 0

    That was easy!

  24. So now Office Depot = Office Max = Staples... by patniemeyer · · Score: 0

    I did not realize until just now that Office Depot and Office Max had merged (or were always the same to begin with).
    So we are left with one major office outlet... Does competition work in any industry anymore?

    Pat

    1. Re:So now Office Depot = Office Max = Staples... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      "In a dog-eat-dog world, you eventually end up with one very fat dog" - Don't remember who said it, read it on a forum.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  25. New Motto by MagickalMyst · · Score: 1

    "That was sleazy."

    --
    Political correctness is really just herd psychology pushed by insecure people who desperately seek social conformity.
  26. Re:Obama's Administration LOVES monopolies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Real unemployment is as high as it has been since the Carter administration. Maybe you should stop sucking Chris Matthews' cock and look at real, honest numbers for a change.

  27. Of course it will be approved by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    Have we seen any mergers refused in the past 10+ years? At this point if Microsoft wanted to merge with Sony and then buy out Apple I wouldn't expect refusals of any of that either.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Of course it will be approved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Outright refused I cannot think of any. But The T-Mobile AT&T merger, and the current Comcast/TWC mergers come to mind as ones that are troubled. The AT&T one was troubled enough that AT&T walked away before it was able to be blocked. Comcast is doing their best to try getting the TWC merger through but it hasn't succeeded yet.

      I think they prefer to make things problematic enough that the companies end up backing away so they don't have to out right block the mergers.

  28. Re:Obama's Administration LOVES monopolies by afidel · · Score: 1

    Hmm, labor force participation rate is about where it was at the end of Regan's first term, but if you drill into the details you'd see that most of the hit is to 16-24 year olds, and it's largely been because the 55+ rate is higher than it's been in 40+ years, basically the boomers won't retire so there's little room at the bottom. The boomers refusing to retire wouldn't be a problem in an expanding economy, but in one that went through a hundred year recession followed by a rather flat recovery it's going to have some significant impacts.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  29. Anybody else remember RICHH? by pLnCrZy · · Score: 1

    There's this annoying ad for Staples office supply store on
    tv. I call up directory assistance, get their number, and give
    'em a buzz.

              "Hello, is this Staples?"
              "Yes it is. How may I help you."
              Too eager to please.
              "I was just wondering how you came up with the name of the
    store. I mean, you sell staples, right?"
              "Yes we do. We're the one-stop off--"
              "Yes, I'm sure you are, but tell me. John Wanamaker's. Do
    they sell wanamakers?"
              "Well, I--"
              "Do you even know what a wanamaker is?"
              "I think--"
              "No, of course you don't. What do you make? Minimum? Less?
    Christ, you sound young, had your first period yet?"
              "Exc--"
              "Use tampons or pads? You know if you use tampons, no guy'll
    believe you're a virgin. Then you'll get a reputation and you'll
    never get married. And--"
              "I don't--"
              "Excuse me. I digressed. Now tell me, you sell file cabinets,
    right?"
              "Yes we do."
              "And you sell those little mail trays you put on your desk
    that say 'In' and 'Out', right?"
              "Yes we do. We're the one-stop--"
              But you don't call yourself 'File cabinets', right? I mean,
    that's a pretty stupid name. And you sure as hell don't call
    yourself 'Those little mail trays you put on your desk that say
    "In" and "Out"', right? I mean, that name really sucks."
              "Why, why are--"
              "All right, follow me here. What does a supermarket sell?"
              "F-food."
              "Good. Shit, you should earn more than minimum. Christ, I
    could have my old man put you on the payroll down here. . .Shit,
    what was I--oh yeah, food, right? But does the supermarket call
    itself 'Food'? Noooo. It's called a supermarket."
              "I-I didn't--"
              "Listen, I'd love to stay and talk to you longer, but I gotta
    go do something to my dog. You understand."
              "Waaahhhhh. . ."
              So it wasn't such a bad day after all.

    RICHH

    ---- From the RICHH Archives (http://www.lunabase.org/~faber/RICHH/)

  30. Fuck You Bain and Romney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you Bain

  31. Office Depot Corruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Office depot got caught in a deceptive overcharging scheme to gov't contracts, paid back millions on purpose, don't believe it ..look it up. Most corrupt company in history. !! In fact CEO Steve Oddland quit when confronted...