Slashdot Mirror


Georgia State Univ. Art Project Causes 2nd Evacuation & Bomb Squad Call

McGruber writes The same Georgia State University art project responsible for Monday's shutdown of Atlanta's Downtown Connector (Interstates 75 & 85), caused authorities in the south Fulton County, Georgia town of Hapeville to evacuate businesses and call in a bomb squad Tuesday.

According to Georgia State University spokesman Don Hale, the devices are pinhole camera being used in a solargraphy project to track the rising and setting of the sun over a three-month period. "Students were instructed to take their cameras home and to place them in locations that would provide interesting scenes with bright sunlight," Hale said. "The locations were selected by the students."

It was up to each of the 18 students in the class to find a spot for their own project, the university said. The university was made aware of the art project Tuesday morning and, through its police department, immediately informed the Atlanta Police Department, Hale said.

101 comments

  1. Scaredy cats! by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    And too funny to watch these people trip all over themselves like Keystone Cops.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  2. "Solargraphy" by magsol · · Score: 1

    The cameras were actually there to capture the lulz.

    --
    "I'd just like to emphasise that taking a million years isn't a metaphor here..." -Rich Bradshaw
  3. ROTFL!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh! This is more than I hoped for! All of you panicking like little girls!

    And the hate most Americans feel towards Muslims!

    I will finally get my war between Islam and the West!

    I'm waiting here in Hell!

    --Osama Bin Laden's Ghost

    1. Re:ROTFL!!! by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      This is more than I hoped for! All of you panicking like little girls!

      And that's what this art project was really about, it's not some solarlalalography thing, it's a performance art piece that reminds society how effective terrorism has been in the US.

  4. mooninites by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

    welcome to Boston...

    1. Re:mooninites by TWX · · Score: 2

      As stupid as the Boston thing was, this is even dumber if these 'cameras' are what I think they are.

      If a solar-path pinhole camera is designed right then it has no moving parts once it's assembled and the film is loaded. It literally just lets light in through a pinhole, so it can track bright things like the sun based on where the little bit of light through the pinhole strikes the flim as the planet rotates.

      At least the Boston thing had wires and power. This is literally a box with a hole in it.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re:mooninites by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      If this camera is anything like the last one, it looks an awful lot like the sort of outsized firecracker that a teenager with access to a few pounds of blackpowder would make.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  5. Unauthorized Suspicous-Looking Art in Public Place by jtara · · Score: 2

    "Students were instructed to take their cameras home and to place them in locations that would provide interesting scenes with bright sunlight,"

    What part of "home" did these students not understand?

    Although I think most of us would not think that placing the cameras in a public place for art's sake is some horrible offense, it might be a violation of privacy, and it is certainly not prudent in a terrorism-obsessed world.

    It should have been done with some sort of official approval, and placed with some kind of sign. Perhaps a simple: "What is this? It's part of an art project. For the sake of art, please do not disturb! Go to this website to find out more: [Insert URL here]

    Of course, that would probably take months of rigmarole to get approved.

    I've seen similar signs on weather stations, wildlife projects, "what's happening to the bees" projects, etc. Here around San Diego, we often come across stuff like this along the beach. (Measuring sand erosion, wildlife, etc.)

  6. I think its pretty clear who the winner is. by nimbius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Congratulations Georgia. In the face of the 21st century where we support the troops, these colours dont run, and freedom is championed above all else you've just shit all over the idea that we in any sense emerged triumphantly from 9/11. You've marched lock-step, just as any terrorist would hope his actions would inspire you to, to the beat of their drum and not reason so ive got an idea.

    If every time someone sees a box, or a can, or a light bright sitting on the street we're gong to evacuate a city and lock down schools, then lets cut the "freedom and liberty" crap. If every time we get on a plane we have to be stripsearched by xray booths and patted down for even a pittance of liquid, lets stop saying we never negotiate with terrorists and start commending ourselves for doing just what they want. If I cant make a call, or send an email, or surf the internet or even drive car without the NSA and ubiquitous plate readers tracking my every move, then lets be frank about it and recycle the statue of liberty into something more useful like tear gas grenades or battery chargers for tazers.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:I think its pretty clear who the winner is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the common man in the US is living in a constant state of confusion, ignorance, hatered, and fear.

    2. Re:I think its pretty clear who the winner is. by jklovanc · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If every time someone sees a box, or a can, or a light bright sitting on the street we're gong to evacuate a city and lock down schools, then lets cut the "freedom and liberty" crap.

      Exaggerate much? They closed down one street for a short period of time. Get over it.

    3. Re:I think its pretty clear who the winner is. by chronoglass · · Score: 1

      Sorry, 9/11 has nothing to do with this.. as much as the "watershed moment of our generation" should be blamed for.. treating a potential explosive device like this is SOP for every bomb squad.. ever... This one didn't look exactly like the other one, it had 2 pipes strapped to it with wires sticking out of it.

      but hey, let's stick to the fear answer. it's working great so far.

    4. Re:I think its pretty clear who the winner is. by OzPeter · · Score: 5, Informative

      This one didn't look exactly like the other one, it had 2 pipes strapped to it with wires sticking out of it.

      but hey, let's stick to the fear answer. it's working great so far.

      Bzzz.. Wrong. The camera did not have 2 pipes strapped to it, with wires sticking out. The camera was strapped to two metal conduits that were conveniently poking out of the bridge itself and were the remains of where something like a light pole had been removed. You can see all of this in the image in TFA.

      But really? Pipes with wires coming out of them as being indicative of a bomb is as bad a hollywood device as Adam West running around with a black object with "Bomb" painted on the side.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    5. Re:I think its pretty clear who the winner is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      One street? A short period of time? This had half of Atlanta stuck in a traffic snarl for hours.

    6. Re:I think its pretty clear who the winner is. by JeffAtl · · Score: 2

      This is a different incident.

    7. Re:I think its pretty clear who the winner is. by jythie · · Score: 2

      Look at the bright side, if they had been in Boston instead the students would have been arrested for placing 'hoax devices' and have police talking about how lucky the people were that they were not simply shot.

    8. Re:I think its pretty clear who the winner is. by kogut · · Score: 2

      Pipes with wires coming out of them as being indicative of a bomb is as bad a hollywood device as Adam West running around with a black object with "Bomb" painted on the side.

      Yet that's exactly what a lot of actual IEDs look like.

    9. Re:I think its pretty clear who the winner is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IEDs look like stuff, spot stuff, shut down the city.

      Very logical.

    10. Re:I think its pretty clear who the winner is. by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Yes, hidden IEDs. Not ones placed out in the open in public places.

    11. Re:I think its pretty clear who the winner is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes they're in open public places. Boston, for example.

    12. Re:I think its pretty clear who the winner is. by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      That happens every weekday evening anyway...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  7. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...make up your own scenario, here, but under what (if any) circumstances would it be appropriate to notify local law enforcement of anything. When responding, please don't use your typical slashdot-minded bullshit of, "OMG, it's just a guy with a camera," or something else. Actually try to describe a scenario, other than one where tens, hundreds, or thousands of people have already been killed, where it would actually be acceptable for a citizen to "say something".

    Note: I don't expect any substantive answers.

    1. Re:So... by chronoglass · · Score: 1

      mind your own business and take another bridge.. not my problem, terrorists don't win if I don't play THEIR game.

    2. Re:So... by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      There are many scenarios that would be appropriate to notify law enforcement.

      Seeing a person in a ski mask going in to a bank.

      Seeing a neighbour's house being broken into.

      Seeing a person being dragged into a car.

      Seeing a car weave all over the road.

      Law enforcement is not the enemy.

    3. Re:So... by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      I don't have a sense of how big this thing was. If it was small does it really warrant this scared of a response? If you are making bombs out of cheap material like coke cans, can are you really going to have a substance THAT concentrated to that it would really cause damage?

    4. Re:So... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Okay, a coke can holds 12 oz. of Coke. Which is about 0.36 liters. TNT has a density of 1.65, so a coke can could hold around 600 grams of TNT.

      A 105 HE shell runs about 2200 grams of TNT, so this "coke can bomb" would have had about 1/4 the bang of a 105 howitzer shell, with next to no shrapnel.

      For the required car analogy, the coke can bomb (if it had existed) would have been about as powerful as a Prius at 125 mph running into whatever. Given that the "whatever" in this case was the side of a bridge, damage to the bridge would have been minimal, though it probably would have scared the crap out of any driver nearby at the time....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    5. Re:So... by jythie · · Score: 2

      Law enforcement is complaining that the university did not notify them, so the issue is not the appropriateness of people calling law enforcement when they see something, but of expectations of informing the police before they do things.

      I imagine if the school did contact them first, they would either have been told 'why are you telling us this?' or 'don't place the cameras, it is politcally safer for us to simpy nix it'.

    6. Re:So... by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      OK, Here is a real life example. I belong to the SCA. We sometimes have combat practices in public parks. We inform the local police that it is occurring so that any reports of "fighting with swords" can be explained. We sometimes even get police officers coming down to watch.

      By the way rapier combat can look like real fighting.

    7. Re:So... by kogut · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I imagine if the school did contact them first, they would either have been told 'why are you telling us this?' or 'don't place the cameras, it is politcally safer for us to simpy nix it'.

      Just n=1, but I did this exact same thing in grad school (except it was engineering, not art). We contacted the City to ask permission. The City thanked us for asking, and actually allocated City resources to help us install the cameras. That was ~15 years ago, and the University-owned cameras are still in operation as an educational resource in studying traffic patterns.

    8. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many 9mm charges would it be? A 9mm pistol round can certainly kill someone.

      Oh yeah, it's not like Atlanta has any experience with bombs.

    9. Re:So... by jythie · · Score: 1

      If I had not already commented, I would mod you up ^_^

      My personal experiences with police have generally been similar to the later, with anything outside the norm being simplier to deny than them taking any thought/risk, but mileage will of course vary.

    10. Re:So... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Rapier combat is real fighting. You just hold your blows, blunt your tips, and keep score - used to be it would end with someone bleeding out on the ground.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    11. Re:So... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      9mms don't just explode (unless it's a Glock). It's a hot fast burn and the gas pressure pushes the bullet. Nothing like what happens with an explosion.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    12. Re:So... by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      Sorry If I offended. I meant real as in two people actually trying to cause real damage to each other.

      It still holds that it is a good idea to tell the local police that you are going to do it in a public place.

    13. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, modern rapier 'combat' is *sport* fighting. There's a rather significant difference. (The largest being that injuries are treated as something to be avoided, rather than the *goal*.)

    14. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 9mm pistol round outside of the chamber of a firearm will throw the bullet a few dozen feet, and throw a tiny bit of brass shrapnel a few yards. The most likely injury, should someone be hit by any of it, would be a bruise. In fact, entire pallets of pistol or rifle ammunition, when set on fire, can be safely dealt with by fire fighters at a distance of 10 *feet* or less without risk of injury.

      The simple fact of the matter is that bombs require a pressure vessel of some sort. The casing of a firearm cartridge is too weak to provide that. A soda can is even weaker than that. Crimson Avenger is right. Packed full of TNT, that soda can would have made a lot of noise, but not much else.

  8. correction: suspicious by jtara · · Score: 1

    Before some persnickety spelling pundit calls me on it: "suspicious", not "suspicous". And because /. doesn't allow editing posts after they are posted.

  9. well... by chronoglass · · Score: 4, Insightful

    my first thought was, after they knew about the first one.. having a second cause problems is a bit stupid.. then of course they leave out that this second student strapped two metal pipes to the side with wires sticking out of em "for stability".. and I realize just how stupid people really can be..

    yeah I made this art project that looks exactly like a uhaul truck and "parked" it in front of a federal building in oklahoma.. seriously, why'd you arrest me?!

  10. smells like a bomb to me by turkeydance · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "...the device, in addition to having a 12-ounce can wrapped in duct tape, also included two ¾-inch steel pipes with four electrical wires protruding from the top."

    1. Re:smells like a bomb to me by OzPeter · · Score: 4, Informative

      "...the device, in addition to having a 12-ounce can wrapped in duct tape, also included two ¾-inch steel pipes with four electrical wires protruding from the top."

      From looking at the picture in TFA, it looks like the pinhole camera was duct-taped to the remains of a light pole on the bridge. You can make out an old baseplate, and the 3/4 inch steel pipes are just the conduit cemented into the bridge itself in order to protect the wires - that were cut off and left when the light was removed.

      You can see this sort of shit anywhere there is decaying infrastructure, as it takes more money to properly clean up after something is removed.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  11. Re:Unauthorized Suspicous-Looking Art in Public Pl by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's the disproportionate response that the problem.

    Asking people to label their things with "This is not a bomb" is the equivalent of the evil bit. Completely pointless.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  12. As a resident of Midtown... by dontbemad · · Score: 1

    ...I was glad that I took MARTA that day!

  13. I think it's pretty obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The terrorists won. There cause was to incite irrational fear and they have done their job superbly. Good night America, it was fun while it lasted.

    1. Re:I think it's pretty obvious by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      After the rally in France, CNN had an idiot congresscritter on (R after the name, of course). He made a backhanded remark about how "people with signs" won't stop groups like ISIS. He wanted more bombers to go bomb the hell out of them. And the subtext here is, of course, is that he wanted more fear. He's also entirely wrong.

      I think the reaction in France is 100% correct and it's exactly the opposite, of course, of what we do here. The whole point of ISIS wanting the attacks in France was so the public would be upset and fear. Instead they organized a rally that was a huge middle finger in the faces of the attackers. They held a rally that was a huge target and said we aren't going to change our way of life for your assholes.

      Of course in the US we just allow it to be used by the fearmongers that want to control us and the corporate entities that want to make money on the war goods.

    2. Re:I think it's pretty obvious by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      The only people inspiring fear among the public are the ones calling out bomb squads to blow things up while they tell people how dangerous every bush and soda can is. Everybody must be afraid all the time or they might just realize how ridiculous they are behaving.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
  14. You have no clue what you are talking about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...which isn't surprising.

    So, when is it okay for someone to notify law enforcement of a bag, or object, or anything else that is out of place?

    Never, because we're "America"?

    Or is it better to be oblivious because any possible terrorist attacks are sure to have smaller death rates than drink driving, driving without seatbelts, household accidents, or any other random issues you can insert here that don't have anything to do with an ideological enemy (for WHATEVER reason) actively seeking to kill anyone who happens to be a US citizen?

    1. Re:You have no clue what you are talking about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it is in fact better to ignore the threat of terrorism. Call it "being oblivious" if you like, but given the minuscule risks there is no point in spending money or time or effort to try and prevent something that's five times less likely than being struck by lightning.

  15. Home of the Brave (tm) by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Georgians saw their shadow, six more decades of Jim Crow.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  16. Critical Infrastructure! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How can a university have the audacity to assign students the project of photographing such critical infrastructure like the Sun? Surely, federal or state laws prohibit photographing things like nuclear power plants, dams, electrical distribution nodes, etc. and would apply in this case? If everyone is allowed to do what they want with the Sun and there are no regulations or policies in place to determine how the Sun is used, viewed or stared directly at, how will we ever win the Global War On (or Of) Terror??!!

  17. Edited version of terrorism handbook now on sale by OzPeter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The revised edition now has a section on how to cause mass panic and bring an entire city to a standstill. It reads something like this:

    Go to Walmart
    Buy a 12 pack of Coke and a role of duct tape
    Drink the coke
    Duct tape the empty cans to a series of public infrastructures (EG all the bridges surrounding a specific area)
    Call 911 and report seeing more than one suspicious objects.

    Bonus marks
        1) scrawl some arabic looking words to the outside of each installation
        2) Fill the cans with talcum powder

    This should be good for paralyzing a city for at least a complete day

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  18. GA State definitely has the creme students! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GA State definitely has the creme of the crop students!

    1. Re:GA State definitely has the creme students! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up, you insensitive clod. My girlfriend/sister goes to GA state.

    2. Re:GA State definitely has the creme students! by jeek · · Score: 4, Funny

      She's your girlfriend AND your sister? What part of GA are you from?

      --
      If you want to be seen, stand up. If you want to be heard, speak up. If you want to be respected, sit down and shut up.
    3. Re:GA State definitely has the creme students! by houghi · · Score: 1

      She's your girlfriend AND your sister? What part of GA are you from?

      Well, it happened a long long time ago in a galaxy far far away. Please don't judge me.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  19. sick society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    “Fear is the path to the dark side. Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering.”

    - Yoda

  20. Re:Unauthorized Suspicous-Looking Art in Public Pl by smooth+wombat · · Score: 5, Informative

    and placed with some kind of sign.

    They were. The linked story doesn't say it but this one does. Specifically:

    Photos of other cameras show them attached to trees, fences and windows around the city. Some include notes that identify the soda can as a "Georgia State Art Project." Some instruct passersby to "Please do not take down!"

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  21. Re:Unauthorized Suspicous-Looking Art in Public Pl by khallow · · Score: 1

    Hi, this is a bomb with the evil bit set to off. So no worries!

  22. Part 2 by jklovanc · · Score: 1

    Get charged with filling false police reports.
    Get sued for the costs incurred by those false reports.

    1. Re:Part 2 by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      Get charged with filling false police reports.
      Get sued for the costs incurred by those false reports.

      What sort of terrorist are you if you don't have an exit strategy that avoids being identified by the authorities?

      And if you are a terrorist, then false police reports and being sued are the least of your worries.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    2. Re:Part 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Extra bonus marks: do this 3 or 4 times (anonymously, of course). Get the police sick and tired of your pranks.

      *Then* and only then, actually put a bomb somewhere.

      (Posting anonymously for obvious reason. Also, please don't actually do this.)

    3. Re:Part 2 by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      What sort of terrorist are you if you don't have an exit strategy that avoids being identified by the authorities?

      Wait ... isn't the "exit strategy" dying, becoming a martyr, and collecting your 72 virgins?

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re:Part 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Call 911 and report seeing more than one suspicious objects." ...
      "Get charged with filling false police reports."

      Um, no.

  23. Re:Unauthorized Suspicous-Looking Art in Public Pl by jythie · · Score: 1

    Generally what one does when they place sensors or such in public spaces is you include a name and contact number so people can verify the device. Usually works.

  24. Losers by jtara · · Score: 1

    Losers:

    - GoPro

    - Duck Tape

    - Any hope for the future of handwriting, or even hand-printing

    1. Re:Losers by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      - Pinhole camera + film

      - Duct tape

      - Novel way of looking at the world that will impact how they approach the rest of their life (especially with two so far being blown up as threats).

  25. 16 to go... by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

    Unless the rest of the students were less imaginative and kept their cameras on private property.

  26. Re:Unauthorized Suspicous-Looking Art in Public Pl by fustakrakich · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...not prudent in a terrorism-obsessed world.

    I believe you should remain focused on the obsession and leave the kids alone. Deal with that before you get an ulcer or something. The panicky reaction only gives incentive to do more of the same. Like it or not, it's good entertainment.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  27. Re:Unauthorized Suspicous-Looking Art in Public Pl by OzPeter · · Score: 1

    Some include notes that identify the soda can as a "Georgia State Art Project." Some instruct passersby to "Please do not take down!"

    Because only non-bombs have signs that say they are innocuous.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  28. teacher failed it on common sense by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    This teacher should have told the students to label their instruments, with contact information, so the police could verify that you're not some disaffected madbomber type person before they blow up your camera.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  29. Re:Unauthorized Suspicous-Looking Art in Public Pl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, the anti-science muslim fanatics have tried to bomb me a few times. That doesn't look signfincantly unlike one of the IEDs I've seen. A note with a phone number and the class website would have been a very, very good idea.

  30. Life Intimates Art by DrunkenTerror · · Score: 1

    Just think what would have to happen if everyone were to actually do what the idiot security thespians want us to do and "if we see something, say something." Every discarded tin can along a roadway, every ungarded box sitting on the grass. Choke them to death on their own system.

    Make it a game. How many suspicious packages can YOU call in today?

    "Oh, no ma'am. I'm not calling in a bomb threat. I thought I saw a suspicious package."

  31. Real Life Grand Theft Auto? by thebes · · Score: 1

    Those are just the hidden packages!

  32. The signs... by jtara · · Score: 1

    Based on the appearance of those signs, the police should have immediately rounded-up all of the five-year-olds in the area.

    Some of them had signs. Some of them didn't. And I doubt anyone was crawling-around under bridges looking for the signs. Of course, police would have seen the signs once they investigated. Or maybe their bomb-sniffing robot might have.

    Did the police over-react? I dunno. You'd have to be there. I wasn't.

    It remains that placing the objects was begging the response. It was stupid.

    If I were a conspiracy theorist, I'd say perhaps it was a test - by officials or by nefarious interests - to see how alert the public is. Now we know: the public is alert!

  33. Perspective by WinstonWolfIT · · Score: 1

    Outside the window near me I can see the Lyndt store in Sydney that just yesterday has started to be repaired from the hostage killing by a nutjob. In crowded places, near infrastructure, IEDs (whether E means Educational, Entertaining or Explosive) are no longer an option. I'm certain the residents of Boston and Atlanta largely agree.

  34. At this point... by NoKaOi · · Score: 1

    Regardless of whether you think police are overreacting, at this point it seems like it would be wise for the school to tell their students either to collect their boxes or contact the police in the jurisdiction where they placed them to let them know where they are and what they look like (at which point the cops would probably tell them to get rid of them). Seems like having to collect them and place them somewhere else would be better than getting your project blown up.

  35. maybe deal with it like in Soviet Russia by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    Prohibit activities like art projects unless they are blessed by the State and Ministry. Geez, I miss 20th century America.

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
  36. The police blew up my homework. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in my day, we blamed it on the dog.

  37. Re:Unauthorized Suspicous-Looking Art in Public Pl by sandytaru · · Score: 1

    And where should these students place them if they live in the dorms? Not everyone lives in a house with a back yard when they're in college.

    --
    Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
  38. Re:Unauthorized Suspicous-Looking Art in Public Pl by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

    And how does this prevent a bomber getting a burner phone, leaving a fake name and the burner phone contact number and verifying that they're the fake identity when called?

    Any security procedure needs to be not trivially worked around by the persons the security measure is trying to prevent doing their evil deeds. If you can't pass that test, don't bother and accept that it probably won't happen and a bit of risk is the cost of a free society.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  39. Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From CNN:

    "Police are working with the school to remove all the cameras, the university release said."

    Hmm. Google photographer's bill of rights. Photography is protected (in the USA) under the US Constitution as free speech. Bascially, you have the right to take photographs. If you are not on public property the owner can say, 'you can't do that here,' and ask you to leave.Same with public buildings. So, this is photography. Does leaving your camera in a public location, with or without duct-tape change anything? Normally, leaving something out in public space, that does not rise to a significant level (like suing someone for $1) wouldn't be an issue. What if the camera is on private property, with or without duct tape?
    Here's a thought. Just like people have proposed black lists and white lists of internet site access, are we heading toward a society that says only pre-approved, white listed behavior is allowed? Which will probably only a small percent of all the things people do or want to do.

  40. How Does a Pin-Hole Camera ... by wisnoskij · · Score: 2

    How does a pin-hole camera even look like a bomb? It should not even be close to big enough to be a worry. You need something like like the size of a mid sized tablet, minimum to have any decent explosive power. Think of a bullet, it has about the power of a punch, and is far bigger that most cameras nowadays. Saying that, I have since seen that camera's they have used, and they really really do look like bombs. with big enough payloads to make quite a dent.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    1. Re:How Does a Pin-Hole Camera ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pinhole cameras can be surprisingly large.

      Largest in the world
      Industrial wheelie bins
      And many other sizes

      Size, shape and construction doesn't matter. A pinhole camera can look like a bomb, a bomb can look like a pinhole camera.

      If you want to deploy such things in public, then the scheme needs publicity and the co-operation of public bodies. Otherwise, the official response (in this case) is largely correct.

    2. Re:How Does a Pin-Hole Camera ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Presumably, the art department could have obtained permission from the university to allow the art students to place the cameras on university property with signage indicating what the cameras were. Alternately, the students could have obtained permission to place the cameras on private property. To place the cameras on public property without permission with or without signage results in exactly the response seen in the interest of public safety.

  41. Re:Unauthorized Suspicous-Looking Art in Public Pl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will remember the next time I plant a real bomb that a little sign saying 'This is not a bomb, its a camera' will keep it from being detected longer.

    To the humorless filter that picked this up, its satire, roll with it.

  42. Once burned. by westlake · · Score: 1

    The Centennial Olympic Park bombing was a terrorist bomb attack on the Centennial Olympic Park in Atlanta, Georgia, on July 27 during the 1996 Summer Olympics. The blast claimed 1 life and injured 111 people, while another person died of a heart attack. It was the first of four bombings committed by Eric Robert Rudolph.

    Centennial Olympic Park bombing

    The truth is that bags, parcels, jugs, cans, and such which don't look quite look quite right or don't seem to belong here are immediately and rightfully suspect.

    Second guessing the 911 caller is a waste of time.

    What the geek needs to do is start thinking about how his toys, gadgets, hoaxes, stunts and science projects out-of-doors will be perceived by others ---

    who won't be so quick to assume that a real life bomber thinks like a geek and plays by his rules.

    1. Re:Once burned. by Phil+Urich · · Score: 1

      A single data point doesn't turn an irrational fear into a rational, respectable one. We can still demand more sense and an actual understanding of the risks from the authorities, instead of a fear or public panic based one. As many have pointed out, more people die on average per hour from vehicular accidents in America than have died from terrorism since 2001-09-11. I know we aren't ever going to get a proportional response to such things from authorities, media, or the public, but is being at most within a few orders of magnitude really too much to ask?

      --
      I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!
  43. Recall if you will by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    the Mooninite thing in Boston several years ago. I see that people and cops haven't evolved since then and still regularly report items that are normal as suspicious and the cops dutifully rush in and blow them up.

    1. Re:Recall if you will by Phil+Urich · · Score: 1

      Evolved since then? If anything we've devolved, and shall continue to do so. Fear-based policy and actions have a way of reinforcing themselves.

      --
      I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!
    2. Re:Recall if you will by hey! · · Score: 1

      It'd help if people put their name and telephone number on their hack's chassis.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  44. Re:Unauthorized Suspicous-Looking Art in Public Pl by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    What part of "home" did these students not understand?

    Taking something home and using it exclusively at home are two different things. I would never construe someone saying "take something home" to mean that I need to use it there, only that I cannot use it at the place from which I'm asked to remove it.

    Then there's the question if home is even suitable for the assignment. There were criteria for this such as being able to see the sun. Maybe home is an apartment facing south at lower latitudes. But in any case we had plenty of "take home" assignments and "homework" which involved going out somewhere. So I'm going to assume the only person who doesn't understand the comment is you.

  45. Better terrorism handbook now on sale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... bring an entire city to a standstill.

    Go to Walmart
    Buy a 12 pack of Coke, vinyl gloves and a role of duct tape
    Put on the gloves. Drink the coke.
    Duct tape the empty cans to a series of public infrastructures (EG all the bridges surrounding a specific area)
    Call 911 from a payphoneand report seeing suspicious objects. If required, hang-up after 90 seconds.

    Bonus marks
            1) scrawl some arabic looking words to the outside of each installation
            2) Fill the cans with a mixture of almond flour and white play-dough

  46. Being lefty in the dark... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't RTFA, but...

    The university was made aware of the art project Tuesday morning and, through its police department, immediately informed the Atlanta Police Department

    Funny wording... "the left hand was made aware of the right hand, and though its nerves immediately informed the brain of the impending clap" moment?

  47. Re:Unauthorized Suspicous-Looking Art in Public Pl by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

    And how does this prevent a bomber getting a burner phone, leaving a fake name and the burner phone contact number and verifying that they're the fake identity when called?

    It wouldn't but what it would do is prevent people from panicing for no reason. If a bomber was smart, they would do exactly this
    if they needed to leave a bomb in a public place for a long period of time. But why exactly would a bomber need to do this?
    The bomber really only needs enough time to get to a safe distance.

    For leaving an object in a public place, the steps are 1) ask permission and 2) write your name and number on it. It's been that
    way for years and no, this doesn't leave a giant gap in security because despite what people want to believe it's really easy
    to find a lot of people all in one place and blow them up but luckily it's also an extremely rare event when someone wants to do
    it so you're still thousands of time more likely to die in a car accident.

  48. Stupid fuck's lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the number of bombings Atlanta has had, the Stupid fuckers are lucky they didn't get shot while planting their device and the case would never even go to court.

    "I saw this guy planting a suspicious object on the bridge, and considering Atlanta's history of bombings I shot him figuring it had to be a bomb and he was probably armed as well."

    DA: "Sounds close enough to Stand Your Ground to me. No charges, and thank you for your diligence citizen."

    1. Re:Stupid fuck's lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the number of bombings Atlanta has had, the Stupid fuckers are lucky they didn't get shot while planting their device and the case would never even go to court.

      "I saw this guy planting a suspicious object on the bridge, and considering Atlanta's history of bombings I shot him figuring it had to be a bomb and he was probably armed as well."

      DA: "Sounds close enough to Stand Your Ground to me. No charges, and thank you for your diligence citizen."

      Frightened little girls are braver than you.

  49. No money for infrastructure, need to fight terror! by Phil+Urich · · Score: 1

    From looking at the picture in TFA, it looks like the pinhole camera was duct-taped to the remains of a light pole on the bridge. You can make out an old baseplate, and the 3/4 inch steel pipes are just the conduit cemented into the bridge itself in order to protect the wires - that were cut off and left when the light was removed. You can see this sort of shit anywhere there is decaying infrastructure, as it takes more money to properly clean up after something is removed.

    What, you expect us to spend money to maintain our infrastructure? No way, we're already all tapped out with all the money we need to spend to defend against terrorism! Why, just this week there were two objects that kindof maybe sortof looked like bombs in Georgia! We can't afford to spend money on repairs or even proper dismantling when the fear^H^H^H^H threat of terrorism is hanging over our heads!

    --
    I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!
  50. Re:Unauthorized Suspicous-Looking Art in Public Pl by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

    Although I think most of us would not think that placing the cameras in a public place for art's sake is some horrible offense, it might be a violation of privacy, and it is certainly not prudent in a terrorism-obsessed world.

    Then why the fuck are there all these cameras in public places? And no, I'm not talking about an art project...

  51. Not Hapeville, Hapless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A pipe with wires.... its a bomb its a bomb! This is why you can't do electronics in public. People see wires and everything is a bomb. If you grabbed the cops cell phone and smashed it to the ground 1) you would be arrested and 2) you could shout at the top of your lungs "its a bomb! its a bomb!" (just before they tackle you to the ground). Seriously, if you are building a camera, disguise it to look like a public garbage can and the cops and nutters who like to shout "its a bomb its a bomb" will be assuaged. Likewise, if you are a terrorist, make your bomb look like a garbage can or like its part of the bridge, and you can leave it up for months without anyone batting an eye.

  52. Re:Unauthorized Suspicous-Looking Art in Public Pl by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

    I've lived in a society that really did have a terrorism obsession, and let me tell you - what you are experiencing today is not it.

    You don't know what it is to be truly obsessed with security until you lived in Northern Ireland in the 1970s and 80s.

  53. Re:Unauthorized Suspicous-Looking Art in Public Pl by asdfj · · Score: 1

    For a current example of getting the tone of terrorism response very right, look at Israel's airports. Their security screening consists of highly trained psychological profilers asking a series of questions in the customs line, instead of the strip-half-naked-and-funnel-through-these-xray-tubes approach that we have.
    While they also have armed soldiers walking around, the whole process is so much quicker than any American airport's security procedures that it's almost disorienting. Of course the volume/size is very different, but most rational people would argue that Israel deals with much more threats per capita.